Koordinativ ungesättigte Dirutheniumkomplexe: Synthese und Kristallstrukturen von [Ru2(CO)3L(μ‐η1 : η2‐C≡CPh)(μ‐PtBu2)(μ‐Ph2PCH2PPh2)] (L = CO,PnBu3)

Coordinatively Unsaturated Diruthenium Complexes: Synthesis and X‐ray Crystal Structures of [Ru₂(CO)₃L(μ‐η¹ : η²‐C≡CPh)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂)] (L = CO, PⁿBu₃) [Ru₂(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 1 ) reacts with several phosphines (L) in refluxing toluene under substitution of one carbonyl ligand and yields the compounds [Ru₂(CO)₃L(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] (L = PⁿBu₃, 2 a ; L = PCy₂H, 2 b ; L = dppm‐P, 2 c ; dppm = Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂). The reactivity of 1 as well as the activated complexes 2 a – c towards phenylethyne was studied. Thus 1 , 2 a and 2 b , respectively, react with PhC≡CH in refluxing toluene with elimination of dihydrogen to the acetylide‐bridged complexes [Ru₂(CO)₄(μ‐η¹ : η²‐C≡CPh)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 3 ) and [Ru₂(CO)₃L(μ‐η¹ : η²‐C≡CPh)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 4 a and 4 b ). The molecular structures of 3 and 4 a were determined by crystal structure analyses.     

Koordinativ ungesättigte Dirutheniumkomplexe: Synthese und Kristallstrukturen von [Ru2(CO)n(μ‐H)(μ‐PtBu2)(μ‐Ph2PCH2PPh2)] (n = 4; 5) und [Ru2(CO)4(μ‐CH2)(μ‐H)(μ‐PtBu2)(μ‐Ph2PCH2PPh2)]

Coordinatively Unsaturated Diruthenium Complexes: Synthesis and X‐ray Crystal Structures of [Ru₂(CO)_n(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂)] (n = 4; 5) and [Ru₂(CO)₄(μ‐CH₂)(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂)] The reaction of [Ru₂(μ‐CO)(CO)₅(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(^tBu₂PH)] ( 2 ) with dppm yields the dinuclear species [Ru₂(μ‐CO)(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 3 ) (dppm = Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂). Under thermal or photolytic conditions 3 loses very easily one carbonyl ligand and affords the corresponding electronically and coordinatively unsaturated complex [Ru₂(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 4 ). 4 is also obtainable by an one‐pot synthesis from [Ru₃(CO)₁₂], an excess of ^tBu₂PH and stoichiometric amounts of dppm via the formation of [Ru₂(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(^tBu₂PH)₂] ( 1 ). 4 exhibits a Ru–Ru double bond which could be confirmed by addition of methylene to the dimetallacyclopropane [Ru₂(CO)₄(μ‐CH₂)(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 5 ). The molecular structures of 3 , 4 and 5 were determined by X‐ray crystal structure analyses.     

[Fe2(μsb‐CO)(CO)3(NO)(μ‐PtBu2)(μ‐Ph2PCH2PPh2)]: Synthese,Kristallstruktur und Koordinationsisomerie

[Fe₂(μ_sb‐CO)(CO)₃(NO)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂)]: Synthesis, X‐ray Crystal Structure and Isomerization Na[Fe₂(μ‐CO)(CO)₆(μ‐P^tBu₂)] ( 1 ) reacts with [NO][BF₄] at —60 °C in THF to the nitrosyl complex [Fe₂(CO)₆(NO)(μ‐P^tBu₂)] ( 2 ). The subsequent reaction of 2 with phosphanes (L) under mild conditions affords the complexes [Fe₂(CO)₅(NO)L(μ‐P^tBu₂)], L = PPh₃, ( 3a ); η‐dppm (dppm = Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂), ( 3b ). In this case the phosphane substitutes one carbonyl ligand at the iron tetracarbonyl fragment in 2 , which was confirmed by the X‐ray crystal structure analysis of 3a . In solution 3b loses one CO ligand very easily to give dppm as bridging ligand on the Fe‐Fe bond. The thus formed compound [Fe₂(CO)₄(NO)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 4 ) occurs in solution in different solvents and over a wide temperature range as a mixture of the two isomers [Fe₂(μ_sb‐CO)(CO)₃(NO)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 4a ) and [Fe₂(CO)₄(μ‐NO)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 4b ). 4a was unambiguously characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray structure analysis while 4b was confirmed both by NMR investigations in solution as well as by means of DFT calculations. Furthermore, the spontaneous reaction of [Fe₂(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 5 ) with NO at —60 °C in toluene yields a complicated mixture of products containing [Fe₂(μ‐CO)(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 6 ) as main product beside the isomers 4a and 4b occuring in very low yields.     

Koordinativ ungesättigte Dirutheniumkomplexe: Synthese und Kristallstrukturen von [Ru2(CO)4(μ‐H)(μ‐S)(μ‐PtBu2)(μ‐Ph2PCH2PPh2)] und [Ru2(CO)4(μ‐X)(μ‐PtBu2)(μ‐Ph2PCH2PPh2)] (X = Cl,S2CH)

Coordinatively Unsaturated Diruthenium Complexes: Synthesis and X‐Ray Crystal Structures of [Ru₂(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐S)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂)], [Ru₂(CO)₄(μ‐X)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂)] (X = Cl, S₂CH) [Ru₂(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 1 ) reacts in benzene with elemental sulfur to the addition product [Ru₂(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐S)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 2 ) (dppm = Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂). 2 is also obtained by reaction of 1 with ethylene sulfide. The reaction of 1 with carbon disulfide yields with insertion of the CS₂ into the Ru₂(μ‐H) bridge the dithioformato complex [Ru₂(CO)₄(μ‐S₂CH)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 3 ). Furthermore, 1 reacts with [NO][BF₄] to the complex salt [Ru₂(CO)₄(μ‐NO)(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)][BF₄] ( 4 ), and reaction of 1 with CCl₄ or CHCl₃ affords spontaneously [Ru₂(CO)₄(μ‐Cl)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 5 ) in nearly quantitative yield. The molecular structures of 2 , 3 and 5 were confirmed by crystal structure analyses.     

Koordinativ ungesättigte Dieisenkomplexe: Synthese und Kristallstrukturen von [Fe2(CO)4(μ‐H)(μ‐PtBu2)(μ‐Ph2PCH2PPh2)] und [Fe2(CO)4(μ‐CH2)(μ‐H)(μ‐PtBu2)(μ‐Ph2PCH2PPh2)]

Coordinatively Unsaturated Diiron Complexes: Synthesis and Crystal Structures of [Fe₂(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂)] and [Fe₂(CO)₄(μ‐CH₂)(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂)] [Fe₂(μ‐CO)(CO)₆(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)] ( 1 ) reacts spontaneously with dppm (dppm = Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂) to give [Fe₂(μ‐CO)(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 2 c ). By thermolysis or photolysis, 2 c loses very easily one carbonyl ligand and yields the corresponding electronically and coordinatively unsaturated complex [Fe₂(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 3 ). 3 exhibits a Fe–Fe double bond which could be confirmed by the addition of methylene to the corresponding dimetallacyclopropane [Fe₂(CO)₄(μ‐CH₂)(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 4 ). The reaction of 1 with dppe (Ph₂PC₂H₄PPh₂) affords [Fe₂(μ‐CO)(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppe)] ( 5 ). In contrast to the thermolysis of 2 c , yielding 3 , the heating of 5 in toluene leads rapidly to complete decomposition. The reaction of 1 with PPh₃ yields [Fe₂(CO)₆(H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(PPh₃)] ( 6 a ), while with ^tBu₂PH the compound [Fe₂(μ‐CO)(CO)₅(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(^tBu₂PH)] ( 6 b ) is formed. The thermolysis of 6 b affords [Fe₂(CO)₅(μ‐P^tBu₂)₂] and the degradation products [Fe(CO)₃(^tBu₂PH)₂] and [Fe(CO)₄(^tBu₂PH)]. The molecular structures of 3 , 4 and 6 b were determined by X‐ray crystal structure analyses.     

Aktivierung von Schwefelkohlenstoff an Trirutheniumclustern: Synthese und Kristallstruktur von [Ru3(CO)4(μ‐PCy2)2(μ‐Ph2PCH2PPh2)(μ3‐S){μ3‐η2‐CSC(S)S}]

Activation of Carbon Disulfide on Triruthenium Clusters: Synthesis and X‐Ray Crystal Structure Analysis of [Ru₃(CO)₄(μ‐PCy₂)₂(μ‐Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂)(μ₃‐S){μ₃‐η²‐CSC(S)S}] [Ru₃(CO)₄(μ‐H)₃(μ‐PCy₂)₃(μ‐dppm)] ( 2 ) (dppm = Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂) reacts with CS₂ at room temperature and yields the open 50 valence electron cluster [Ru₃(CO)₄(μ‐PCy₂)₂(μ‐dppm)(μ₃‐S){μ₃‐η²‐CSC(S)S}] ( 3 ) containing the unusual μ₃‐η²‐C₂S₃ mercaptocarbyne ligand. Compound 3 was characterized by single crystal X‐ray structure analysis.     

Aktivierung von Schwefelkohlenstoff an Trirutheniumclustern: Synthese und Kristallstruktur von [Ru3(CO)5(μ‐H)2(μ‐PCy2)(μ‐Ph2PCH2PPh2){μ‐η2‐PCy2C(S)}(μ3‐S)] und [Ru3(CO)5(CS)(μ‐H)(μ‐PtBu2)(μ‐PCy2)2(μ3‐S)]

Activation of Carbon Disulfide on Triruthenium Clusters: Synthesis and X‐Ray Crystal Structure Analysis of [Ru₃(CO)₅(μ‐H)₂(μ‐PCy₂)(μ‐Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂){μ‐η²‐PCy₂C(S)}(μ₃‐S)] and [Ru₃(CO)₅(CS)(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐PCy₂)₂(μ₃‐S)] [Ru₃(CO)₆(μ‐H)₂(μ‐PCy₂)₂(μ‐dppm)] ( 1 ) (dppm = Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂) reacts under mild conditions with CS₂ and yields by oxidative decarbonylation and insertion of CS into one phosphido bridge the opened 50 VE‐cluster [Ru₃(CO)₅(μ‐H)₂(μ‐PCy₂)(μ‐dppm){μ‐η²‐PCy₂C(S)}(μ₃‐S)] ( 2 ) with only two M–M bonds. The compound 2 crystallizes in the triclinic space group P 1 with a = 19.093(3), b = 12.2883(12), c = 20.098(3) Å; α = 84.65(3), β = 77.21(3), γ = 81.87(3)° and V = 2790.7(11) ų. The reaction of [Ru₃(CO)₇(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐PCy₂)₂] ( 3 ) with CS₂ in refluxing toluene affords the 50 VE‐cluster [Ru₃(CO)₅(CS)(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐PCy₂)₂(μ₃‐S)] ( 4 ). The compound cristallizes in the monoclinic space group P 2₁/a with a = 19.093(3), b = 12.2883(12), c = 20.098(3) Å; β = 104.223(16)° and V = 4570.9(10) ų. Although in the solid state structure one elongated Ru–Ru bond has been found the complex 4 can be considered by means of the ³¹P‐NMR data as an electron‐rich metal cluster.     

Room-temperature C–H activation of the phosphino-ketone Ph2PCH2C(O)Ph leading to an iridium(III) complex with a hybrid phosphino-enolate ligand

The reaction of [Ir(cod)(μ-Cl)]₂ (cod = 1,5-cyclooctadiene) with 2 equiv of the ketophosphine Ph₂PCH₂C(O)Ph in the presence of TlPF₆ afforded the hydrido, phosphino-enolate Ir(III) complex [IrH(cod){Ph₂PCH···C(···O)Ph,κP,κO}{Ph₂PCH₂C(O)Ph,κP}]PF₆ (4), which results from the room temperature activation of a C–H bond from the PCH₂ moiety. The distorted octahedral coordination environment around the metal centre in 4 contains the cod ligand, the P atom of the monodentate ketophosphine and the P,O donor atoms of a chelating phosphino-enolate ligand acting as a 3-electron donor. The hydride ligand was located on the difference Fourier map obtained by single-crystal X-ray diffraction studies and is trans to the enolate oxygen and cis to the two, mutually cis P atoms. The reaction of this complex with NaH in THF led to the isolation of the Ir(I) complex [Ir(cod){Ph₂PCH···C(···O)Ph,κP,κO}{Ph₂PCH₂C(O)Ph,κP}] (5). The penta-coordination environment around the metal centre in 5 includes the cod ligand, one 3-electron donor P,O chelating phosphino-enolate ligand and a P-bound Ph₂PCH₂C(O)Ph ligand containing an uncoordinated ketone function. The structures of 4·CH₂Cl₂ and 5·C₇H₈ have been determined by X-ray diffraction analysis.     

Heterodinukleare Komplexe: Synthese und Kristallstrukturen von [RuRh(μ‐CO)(CO)4(μ‐PtBu2)(tBu2PH)], [RuRh(μ‐CO)(CO)3(μ‐PtBu2)(μ‐Ph2PCH2PPh2)] und [CoRh(CO)4(μ‐H)(μ‐PtBu2)(tBu2PH)]

Heterobinuclear Complexes: Synthesis and X‐ray Crystal Structures of [RuRh(μ‐CO)(CO)₄(μ‐P^tBu₂)(^tBu₂PH)], [RuRh(μ‐CO)(CO)₃(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂)], and [CoRh(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(^tBu₂PH)] [Ru₃Rh(CO)₇(μ₃‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)₂(^tBu₂PH)(μ‐Cl)₂] ( 2 ) yields by cluster degradation under CO pressure as main product the heterobinuclear complex [RuRh(μ‐CO)(CO)₄(μ‐P^tBu₂)(^tBu₂PH)] ( 4 ). The compound crystallizes in the orthorhombic space group Pcab with a = 15.6802(15), b = 28.953(3), c = 11.8419(19) Å and V = 5376.2(11) ų. The reaction of 4 with dppm (Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂) in THF at room temperature affords in good yields [RuRh(μ‐CO)(CO)₃(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 7 ). 7 crystallizes in the triclinic space group P 1 with a = 9.7503(19), b = 13.399(3), c = 15.823(3) Å and V = 1854.6 ų. Moreover single crystals of [CoRh(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(^tBu₂PH)] ( 9 ) could be obtained and the single‐crystal X‐ray structure analysis revealed that 9 crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2₁/a with a = 11.611(2), b = 13.333(2), c = 18.186(3) Å and V = 2693.0(8) ų.     

Chloridobis[2‐(diphenylphosphanyl)ethanamine‐κ2P,N](triphenylphosphane‐κP)ruthenium(II) chloride toluene monosolvate

The aminophosphane ligand 1‐amino‐2‐(diphenylphosphanyl)ethane [Ph₂P(CH₂)₂NH₂] reacts with dichloridotris(triphenylphosphane)ruthenium(II), [RuCl₂(PPh₃)₃], to form chloridobis[2‐(diphenylphosphanyl)ethanamine‐κ²P,N](triphenylphosphane‐κP)ruthenium(II) chloride toluene monosolvate, [RuCl(C₁₈H₁₅P)(C₁₄H₁₆NP)₂]Cl·C₇H₈ or [RuCl(PPh₃){Ph₂P(CH₂)₂NH₂}₂]Cl·C₇H₈. The asymmetric unit of the monoclinic unit cell contains two molecules of the Ru^II cation, two chloride anions and two toluene molecules. The Ru^II cation is octahedrally coordinated by two chelating Ph₂P(CH₂)₂NH₂ ligands, a triphenylphosphane (PPh₃) ligand and a chloride ligand. The three P atoms are meridionally coordinated, with the Ph₂P– groups from the ligands being trans. The two –NH₂ groups are cis, as are the chloride and PPh₃ ligands. This chiral stereochemistry of the [RuCl(PPh₃){Ph₂P(CH₂)₂NH₂}₂]⁺ cation is unique in ruthenium–aminophosphane chemistry.     

Ionic Platinum(II)–Imidobis(diphenylthiophosphinato) Complexes: Preparation,Structure, and Thermal Behavior

The PPh₂P(S)NHP(S)PPh₂ (dppaS₂) ligand reacts with the starting complexes PtCl₂(L-L) (L-L = Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂), (dppm), Ph₂PCH₂CH₂PPh₂ (dppe), Ph₂PCH₂CH₂CH₂PPh₂ (dppp), and NaClO₄·H₂O. Final products are monomeric complexes, and their formulas are [Pt(L-L)(dppaS₂-H)] [(L-L = dppm(1), dppe(2), dppp(3)]. All of these have been characterized by ¹H, ¹³C^,31{P¹H} NMR, FTIR, and elemental analysis. These complexes were also examined by TGA, DTA, and DSC analysis. Complexes 2 and 3 were crystallographically characterized.     

Preparation and Characterization of a Novel Palladium Complex: cis‐Dichloride(1,2‐bis(diphenylphosphino)vinyl‐P,P′,C)palladium(II)‐(bis(diphenylphosphino)methane‐P,P′)cobaltacarbonyl

A novel palladium complex 4, cis‐dichloride(1,2‐bis(diphenylphosphino)vinyl‐P,P′,C)palladium(II)‐(bis(diphenylphosphino)methane‐P,P′)cobaltacarbonyl, was obtained and characterized from the treatment of [(μ‐Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂)Co₂(CO)₄][(Ph₂PC≡CPPh₂)‐PdCl₂] 3 with hydrochloric acid. The framework of 4 can be regarded as a grouping of two metal‐containing fragments: ‐Co(CO)₂(dppm) and PdCl2(μ‐P,P‐Ph₂PCH=C(‐)PPh₂).     

P-C Bond Cleavage in Platinum Complexes Containing bis (Diphenylphosphino) Methane Promoted with a Phase-Transfer Catalyst

With a phase-transfer catalyst, Pt-dppm (dppm = Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂) complexes undergo basic hydrolysis, in which a dppm ligand is hydrolyzed to produce PPh₂Me and PPh₂OH (or PPh₂O). The ease of this hydrolysis reaction depends partly on the molecular charges of the metal complexes. Hydrolysis of neutral [Pt(dppm)(L-L)] (L-L = S₂CO², S₂P(O)(OEt)^2? and mnt = S₂C₂(CN)₂^2?) is slower than that of monocationic [Pt(dppm)(L′-L′)]Cl (L′-V = S₂CNEt₂-, (CH₂)₂S(O)Me and acetylacetonate) compounds. Among the neutral compounds, hydrolysis of [Pt(dppm)(mnt)] is more rapid than that of the other two. These results are rationalized according to the ease with which partial positive charges are induced on the dppm phosphorus atoms. The steric effect due to ligands trans to dppm also influences the rate of hydrolysis of Pt-dppm compounds. When trans ligands are Ph₂P(CH)₂PPh₂, Ph₂P(CH₂)₃PPh₂ and (Ph₂PO₂)H, no hydrolysis of dppm occurs. Hydrolysis of Pt-dppm compounds depends further on the concentrations of both the phase-transfer catalyst and OH^? ions. All these results are consistent with nucleophilic attack of OH^? on dppm phosphorus atoms to release strain in the Pt-dppm ring.     

Variable Bonding Modes of Pyrimidine‐2‐thione in PdII/PtII Complexes [M(η2‐N,S‐pymS)(η1‐S‐pymS)(PPh3)] and [M(η1‐S‐pymS)2(L‐L)] (L‐L = dppm,dppe)

Reactions of pyrimidine‐2‐thione (HpymS) with Pd^II/Pt^IV salts in the presence of triphenyl phosphine and bis(diphenylphosphino)alkanes, Ph₂P‐(CH₂)_m‐PPh₂ (m = 1, 2) have yielded two types of complexes, viz. a) [M(η²‐N, S‐ pymS)(η¹‐S‐ pymS)(PPh₃)] (M = Pd, 1 ; Pt, 2 ), and (b) [M(η¹‐S‐pymS)₂(L‐L)] {L‐L, M = dppm (m = 1) Pd, 3 ; Pt, 4 ; dppe (m = 2), Pd, 5 ; Pt, 6 }. Complexes have been characterized by elemental analysis (C, H, N), NMR spectroscopy (¹H, ¹³C, ³¹P), and single crystal X‐ray crystallography ( 1 , 2 , 4 , and 5 ). Complexes 1 and 2 have terminal η¹‐S and chelating η²‐N, S‐modes of pymS⁻, while other Pd/Pt complexes have only terminal η¹‐S modes. The solution state ³¹P NMR spectral data reveal dynamic equilibrium for the complexes 3 , 5 and 6 , whereas the complexes 1 , 2 and 4 are static in solution state.     

Reactions of Dienes with a Mo(0) Complex with Tetraphosphine Coligand [Mo(P4)(Ph2PCH2CH2PPh2)] (P4 = Meso‐o‐C6H4(PPhCH2CH2PPh2)2)

Reaction of tetraphosphine complex [Mo(κ⁴‐P4)(Ph₂PCH₂CH₂PPh₂)] (1; P4 = meso‐o‐C₆H₄‐(PPhCH₂CH₂PPh₂)₂) with E‐1,3‐pentadiene in toluene at 60 °C gave the η⁴‐diene complex [Mo(η⁴‐E‐1,3‐pentadiene)(κ⁴‐P4)] (2), which is present as a mixture of two isomers due to the orientation of the Me group in the diene ligand. Treatment of 1 with Z‐1,3‐pentadien also resulted in the formation of 2 as the sole product after heating the reaction mixture at 90 °C. Whereas the reaction of 1 with 1,3‐cyclohexadiene at 60 °C afforded the η⁴‐diene complex [Mo(η⁴‐cyclohexadiene)(κ⁴‐P4)] (6), that with cyclopentadiene led to the C‐H bond scission product [η⁵‐C₅H₅)MoH(κ³‐P4)] (7). Detailed structures were determined by X‐ray crystallography for 2, 6,and 7, and fluxional feature of 6 in solution was clarified based on the VT‐NMR studies.     

Neutral and cationic orthopalladated ( ) complexes ( = phenylazophenyl, dimethylbenzylamine, 8-methylquinoline, 2-methoxy-3-N,N-dimetrylaminopropyl)

By reacting [Pd( )(μ-Cl)]₂ with AgClO₄ in NCMe, the corresponding cationic complexes [Pd( )(NCMe)₂]ClO₄ ( = phenylazophenyl-C²,N¹; dimethylbenzylamine-C²,N; 8-methylquinoline-C⁸,N) can be obtained. Solutions containing the cations [Pd( )(S)₂]⁺ are obtained when the reaction is carried out in tetrahydrofuran or acetone (S). The treatment of these solutions with bidentate ligands (L—L) (Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂,Ph₂PNHPPh₂ or Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂CHC(O)Ph) gives the mononuclear [Pd( )(L3l)]ClO₄ complexes, with L3l acting as a chelate ligand. On the other hand [Pd( (μ-Cl)]₂ reacts with L3l (Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂, Ph₂PNHPPh₂) yielding [Pd( )Cl(L3l)] with L3l acting as monodentate. The reactions between [Pd( )(NCMe)₂]ClO₄ and 2,2′-bipyrimidyl give rise to the formation of the mononuclear [Pd( ) (bipym)]ClO₄ or binuclear [Pd₂( )₂(μ-bipym)](ClO₄)₂, [( )Pd(μ-bipym)Pd( )](ClO₄)₂ derivatives. Finally [Pd( )Cldppm] (dppm = Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂) react with NaH producing the neutral complexes [Pd( )(ddppm)] (ddppm = Ph₂PCHPPh₂) which by reaction with HCl lead again to the starting materials [Pd( )Cl(dppm)].     

Platinum group metal functionalized phosphine complexes. Part 2. Phosphinoamide rhodium(I), iridium(I), palladium(II) and platinum(II) complexes

Summary Rhodium(I), iridium(I), palladium(II) and platinum(II) complexes of the phosphinoamide ligands, Ph₂PCH₂CONHR (R = H, HDPA; Me, MDPA; Ph, PDPA) were prepared and characterized by using conductivity data, i.r., ¹H and ³¹P(H) n.m.r. spectral data. Reaction of the ligands with MCl(PPh₃)₃ and MCl(CO)(PPh₃)₂ (M = Rh, Ir) in CH₂Cl₂ under reflux lead to the formation of MCl(PPh₃)₂ [Ph₂PCH₂C(O)NHR] and MCl(CO)(PPh₃)[Ph₂PCH₂–C(O)HNR] respectively. The reaction of either K₂MCl₄ or cis-MCl₂(PPh₃)₂ affords complexes of the type cis-MCl₂[Ph₂PCH₂C(O)NHR]₂ (M = Pd, Pt). A similar product results even from the reaction of phosphinoamides with cis-platin. Possible structures are proposed for the complexes based on their physicochemical data     

Synthesis,Reactivity, and Crystal Structure of the η2‐Thiocarbamoyl Palladium Complex [Pd(PPh3)2(η2‐SCNMe2)][PF6]

The η¹‐thiocarbamoyl palladium complexes [Pd(PPh₃)(η¹‐SCNMe₂)(η²‐S₂R)] (R = P(OEt)₂, 2 ; CNEt₂, 3 ) and trans‐[Pd(PPh₃)₂(η¹‐SCNMe₂)(η¹‐Spy)], 4 , (pyS: pyridine‐2‐thionate) are prepared by reacting the η²‐thiocarbamoyl palladium complex [Pd(PPh₃)₂(η²‐SCNMe₂)][PF₆], 1 with (EtO)₂PS₂NH₄, Et₂NCS₂Na, and pySK in methanol at room temperature, respectively. Treatment of 1 with dppm (dppm: bis(diphenylphosphino)methane) in dichloromethane at room temperature gives complex [Pd(PPh₃)(η¹‐SCNMe₂)(η²‐dppm)] [PF₆], 5 . All of the complexes are identified by spectroscopic methods and complex 1 is determined by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction.     

Crystallographic and spectroscopic studies of a luminescent binuclear copper(I) complex containing mixed-ligands

The luminescent binuclear copper(I) complex [Cu(dppm)(phen)]₂(NO₃)₂ · 6H₂O (dppm = Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂, phen = 1,10-phenanthroline) has been prepared and characterized by physicochemical and spectroscopic methods. The complex is photoluminescent at room temperature. Its X-ray crystal structure shows that dppm coordinates as a bridging ligand, and phen as a bidentate ligand to the copper(I) atoms of the tetrahedral structure.     

Halide Abstraction from Organic Solvents in Reactions of a Copper(I) Alkoxide: Synthesis and Crystal Structures of [Cu5(dppm)(dppm−)2(OtBu)Cl2] and [Cu3(dppm)3Br2][CuBr2]

The synthesis and structures of the two Cu^I halide complexes [Cu₅(dppm)(dppm^?)₂(O^tBu)Cl₂] and [Cu₃(dppm)₃Br₂][CuBr₂] (dppm = Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂, dppm^? = [Ph₂PCHPPh₂]^?) are reported. The compounds were obtained by treating reaction mixtures of [CuO^tBu] and dppm with dichloromethane or dibromomethane.