Q-universal varieties of bounded lattices

A quasivariety K of algebraic systems of finite type is said to be Q-universal if, for any quasivariety M of finite type, L(M) is a homomorphic image of a sublattice of L(K), where L(M) and L(K) are the lattices of quasivarieties contained in M and K, respectively.? It is known that, for every variety K of (0, 1)-lattices, if K contains a finite nondistributive simple (0, 1)-lattice, then K is Q-universal, see [3]. The opposite implication is obviously true within varieties of modular (0, 1)-lattices. This paper shows that in general the opposite implication is not true. A family (A _i : i < 2ω) of locally finite varieties of (0, 1)-lattices is exhibited each of which contains no simple non-distributive (0, 1)-lattice and each of which is Q-universal. Received July 19, 2001; accepted in final form July 11, 2002.     

2-Normalization of lattices

Let τ be a type of algebras. A valuation of terms of type τ is a function v assigning to each term t of type τ a value v(t) ⩾ 0. For k ⩾ 1, an identity s ≈ t of type τ is said to be k-normal (with respect to valuation v) if either s = t or both s and t have value ⩾ k. Taking k = 1 with respect to the usual depth valuation of terms gives the well-known property of normality of identities. A variety is called k-normal (with respect to the valuation v) if all its identities are k-normal. For any variety V, there is a least k-normal variety N _k (V) containing V, namely the variety determined by the set of all k-normal identities of V. The concept of k-normalization was introduced by K. Denecke and S. L. Wismath in their paper (Algebra Univers., 50, 2003, pp.107–128) and an algebraic characterization of the elements of N _k (V) in terms of the algebras in V was given in (Algebra Univers., 51, 2004, pp. 395–409). In this paper we study the algebras of the variety N ₂(V) where V is the type (2, 2) variety L of lattices and our valuation is the usual depth valuation of terms. We introduce a construction called the 3-level inflation of a lattice, and use the order-theoretic properties of lattices to show that the variety N ₂(L) is precisely the class of all 3-level inflations of lattices. We also produce a finite equational basis for the variety N ₂(L). This research was supported by Research Project MSM6198959214 of the Czech Government and by NSERC of Canada.     

Varieties generated by lattices of breadth two

Some relations between the classB of lattices of breadth at most two and its subclassD of dismantlable lattices, as well as the lattice varietiesV (B) andV (D) generated byV (D) andV (D), respectively, are studied in this paper. For finite join-semidistributive lattices, the two concepts of dismantlability and breadth at most two coincide. There are infinitely many lattice varieties between the varietiesV (D) andV (B), none of them is finitely based.     

The generalized Füredi conjecture holds for finite linear lattices

We say that a rank-unimodal poset P has rapidly decreasing rank numbers, or the RDR property, if above (resp. below) the largest ranks of P, the size of each level is at most half of the previous (resp. next) one. We show that a finite rank-unimodal, rank-symmetric, normalized matching, RDR poset of width w has a partition into w chains such that the sizes of the chains are one of two consecutive integers. In particular, there exists a partition of the linear lattices L_n(q) (subspaces of an n-dimensional vector space over a finite field, ordered by inclusion) into chains such that the number of chains is the width of L_n(q) and the sizes of the chains are one of two consecutive integers.     

Singularities of Toric Varieties Associated with Finite Distributive Lattices

With each finite lattice L we associate a projectively embedded scheme V(L); as Hibi has shown, the lattice D is distributive if and only if V(D) is irreducible, in which case it is a toric variety. We first apply Birkhoff's structure theorem for finite distributive lattices to show that the orbit decomposition of V(D) gives a lattice isomorphic to the lattice of contractions of the bounded poset of join-irreducibles of D. Then we describe the singular locus of V(D) by applying some general theory of toric varieties to the fan dual to the order polytope of P: V(D) is nonsingular along an orbit closure if and only if each fibre of the corresponding contraction is a tree. Finally, we examine the local rings and associated graded rings of orbit closures in V(D). This leads to a second (self-contained) proof that the singular locus is as described, and a similar combinatorial criterion for the normal link of an orbit closure to be irreducible.     

Commuting Derivations and Automorphisms of Certain Nilpotent Lie Algebras Over Commutative Rings

Let L be a finite-dimensional complex simple Lie algebra, L _? be the ?-span of a Chevalley basis of L, and L _R  = R ?_? L _? be a Chevalley algebra of type L over a commutative ring R. Let 𝒩(R) be the nilpotent subalgebra of L _R spanned by the root vectors associated with positive roots. A map ? of 𝒩(R) is called commuting if [?(x), x] = 0 for all x ∈ 𝒩(R). In this article, we prove that under some conditions for R, if Φ is not of type A ₂, then a derivation (resp., an automorphism) of 𝒩(R) is commuting if and only if it is a central derivation (resp., automorphism), and if Φ is of type A ₂, then a derivation (resp., an automorphism) of 𝒩(R) is commuting if and only if it is a sum (resp., a product) of a graded diagonal derivation (resp., automorphism) and a central derivation (resp., automorphism).     

Ergodic theorems for contractions in Orlicz-Kantorovich lattices

We obtain some versions of ergodic theorems for positive contractions in the Orlicz-Kantorovich lattices L _M (m) associated with a measure m taking values in the algebra of measurable real functions. The proof is carried out by representing L _M (m) as measurable bundles of classical Orlicz function spaces.     

Transversally bounded lattices

A problem stemming from a boundedness question for torsion modules and its translation into ideal lattices is explored in the setting of abstract lattices. Call a complete lattice L transversally bounded (resp., uniformly transversally bounded) if for all families (X _i)_iIof nonempty subsets of L with the property that {x _iiI}<1 for all choices of x _iX _i, almost all of the sets X _ihave join smaller than 1 (resp., _jJ X _jhas join smaller than 1 for some cofinite subset J of I). It is shown that the lattices which are transversally bounded, but not uniformly so, correspond to certain ultrafilters with peculiar boundedness properties similar to those studied by Ramsey. The prototypical candidates of the two types of lattices which one is led to construct from ultrafilters (in particular the lattices arising from what will be called Ramsey systems) appear to be of interest beyond the questions at stake.     

On the spectrum of a discrete Laplacian on ℤ with finitely supported potential

We study spectral properties of the discrete Laplacian L?=??Δ?+?V on ? with finitely supported potential V. We give sufficient and necessary conditions for L to satisfy that the number of negative (resp. positive) eigenvalues is equal to one of the points x on which V(x) is negative (resp. positive). In addition, we prove that L has at least one discrete eigenvalue. If ∑ _x∈? V(x)?=?0, then L has both negative and positive discrete eigenvalues.     

Embedding and unsolvability theorems for modular lattices

LetR be a nontrivial ring with 1 and δ a cardinal. Let,L(R, δ) denote the lattice of submodules of a free unitaryR-module on δ generators. Let ? be the variety of modular lattices. A lattice isR-representable if embeddable in the lattice of submodules of someR-module; ?(R) denotes the quasivariety of allR-representable lattices. Let ω denote aleph-null, and let a (m, n) presentation havem generators andn relations,m, n≤ω. THEOREM. There exists a (5, 1) modular lattice presentation having a recursively unsolvable word problem for any quasivarietyV,V ? ?, such thatL(R, ω) is inV. THEOREM. IfL is a denumerable sublattice ofL(R, δ), then it is embeddable in some sublatticeK ofL(R,δ^*) having five generators, where δ^*=δ for infinite δ and δ^*=4δ(m+1) if δ is finite andL has a set ofm generators. THEOREM. The free ?(R)-lattice on ω generators is embeddable in the free ?(R)-lattice on five generators. THEOREM. IfL has an (m, n), ?(R)-presentation for denumerablem and finiten, thenL is embeddable in someK having a (5, 1) ?(R)-presentation.     

Reducible classes of finite lattices

In this paper we study a notion of reducibility in finite lattices. An element x of a (finite) lattice L satisfying certain properties is deletable if L-x is a lattice satisfying the same properties. A class of lattices is reducible if each lattice of this class admits (at least) one deletable element (equivalently if one can go from any lattice in this class to the trivial lattice by a sequence of lattices of the class obtained by deleting one element in each step). First we characterize the deletable elements in a pseudocomplemented lattice what allows to prove that the class of pseudocomplemented lattices is reducible. Then we characterize the deletable elements in semimodular, modular and distributive lattices what allows to prove that the classes of semimodular and locally distributive lattices are reducible. In conclusion the notion of reducibility for a class of lattices is compared with some other notions like the notion of order variety.     

Congruence properties of lattices of quasivarieties

The congruence properties close to being lower boundedness in the sense of McKenzie are treated. In particular, the affirmative answer is obtained to a known question as to whether finite lattices of quasivarieties are lower bounded in the case where quasivarieties are congruence-Noetherian and locally finite. Namely, we state that for every congruence-Noetherian or finitely generated locally finite quasivariety K, the lattice L_q(K) possesses the Day-Pudlak-Tuma property. But if a quasivariety is locally finite without the condition of being finitely generated), that lattice satisfies only the Pudlak-Tuma property. Translated fromAlgebra i Logika, Vol. 36, No. 6, pp. 605–620, Noember, 1997.     

Order affine completeness of lattices with Boolean congruence lattices

This paper grew out from attempts to determine which modular lattices of finite height are locally order affine complete. A surprising discovery was that one can go quite far without assuming the modularity itself. The only thing which matters is that the congruence lattice is finite Boolean. The local order affine completeness problem of such lattices L easily reduces to the case when L is a subdirect product of two simple lattices L ₁ and L ₂. Our main result claims that such a lattice is locally order affine complete iff L ₁ and L ₂ are tolerance trivial and one of the following three cases occurs:

Radicals in pseudocomplemented lattices

For a pseudocomplemented latticeL, we prove that the filter D_n(L), 1n<, generated by then-strongly dense elements is contained in everyn-normal filter. Hence, D_n(L)=G_n(L)=Rad_n (L), where G_n(L) is the intersection of all n-normal filters, and Rad_n (L) is the intersection of alln-normal prime filters. Moreover, we prove that a prime filterP is n-normal iff D_n(L)=P. Consequently, for , we have D_n(L)=G_n(L)=Rad_n (L) and therefore iff Rad_n(L)={1} (or iff G_n(L)={1}).Considering the skeleton S(L) ofL, a complete clarification of the relationship between filters ofL and S(L) is given by studying th correspondence FFS(L).We state that D(L) (and that D₁(L), if is an irredundant intersection of maximal filters (resp. of *-maximal filters) iff S(L) is finite.Finally, for we state that the least *-congruence for which is that one generated by D_n(L).Presented by B. Jónsson.Research supported by the I.N.I:C, (Centro de Algebra da Universidade de Lisboa).     

Embedding of Jordan Copairs into Lie Coalgebras

Let (V, Δ) be a Jordan copair over a field Φ and let V? be its dual pair. Then there exists a Lie coalgebra (L ^c (V), Δ _L ) whose dual algebra (L ^c (V))? is the Kantor–Koecher–Tits construction for the pair V?. If Φ is a field of characteristic other than 2 or 3 then the Lie coalgebra (L ^c (J), Δ _L ) is locally finite-dimensional. As a corollary we derive that Jordan copairs over fields of characteristic other than 2 or 3 are locally finite-dimensional.     

On a problem involving bounded epimorphisms of lattices

A latticeL satisfies thebounded epimorphism condition if wheneverM is a lattce and ϕ:M →L is a bounded epimorphism, there exists a homomorphismι:L →M such that ιϕ=id _L . we show that the class of finite lattices satisfying the bounded epimorphism condition is properly contained in the class of finite lattices satisfying Whitman's condition (W). We also introduce a property defined for finite lattices that is sufficient to imply the bounded epimorphism condition. Presented by B. Jónsson.     

Strictly locally order affine complete lattices

We call a latticeL strictly locally order-affine complete if, given a finite subsemilatticeS ofL ⁿ, every functionf: S L which preserves congruences and order, is a polynomial function. The main results are the following: (1) all relatively complemented lattices are strictly locally order-affine complete; (2) a finite modular lattice is strictly locally order-affine complete if and only if it is relatively complemented. These results extend and generalize the earlier results of D. Dorninger [2] and R. Wille [9, 10].     

Hyperidentities of lattices and semilattices

Following W. Taylor we define a hyperidentity ∈ to be formally the same as an identity (e.g.,F(G(x, y, z), G(x, y, z))=G(x, y, z)). However, a varietyV is said to satisfy a hyperidentity ∈, if whenever the operation symbols of ∈ are replaced by any choice of polynomials (appropriate forV) of the same arity as the corresponding operation symbols of ∈, then the resulting identity holds inV in the usual sense. For example, if a varietyV of type <2,2> with operation symbols ∨ and ∧ satisfies the hyperidentity given above, then substituting the polynomial (x∨y)∨z for the symbolG, and the polynomialx∧y forF, we see thatV must in particular satisfy the identity ((x∨y)∨z)∧((x∨y)∨z)=((x∨y)∨z). The set of all hyperidentities satisfied by a varietyV, will be denoted byH(V). We shall letH ^m (V) be the set of all hyperidentities hoiding inV with operation symbols of arity at mostm, andH _n (V) will denote the set of all hyperidentities ofV with at mostn distinct variables. In this paper we shall show that ifV is a nontrivial variety of lattices or the variety of all semilattices, then for any integersm andn, there exists a hyperidentity ∈ such that ∈ holds inV, and ∈ is not a consequence ofH ^m (V)∪H _n (V). From this it is deduced that the hyperidentities ofV are not finitely based, partly soling a problem of Taylor [7, Problem 3]. The research of the author was supported by NSERC of Canada. Presented by W. Taylor.