Mechanistic aspects of hydrosilylation catalyzed by (ArN=)Mo(H)(Cl)(PMe3)3

The reaction of (ArN=)MoCl(2)(PMe(3))(3) (Ar = 2,6-diisopropylphenyl) with L-Selectride gives the hydrido-chloride complex (ArN=)Mo(H)(Cl)(PMe(3))(3) (2). Complex 2 was found to catalyze the hydrosilylation of carbonyls and nitriles as well as the dehydrogenative silylation of alcohols and water. Compound 2 does not show any productive reaction with PhSiH(3); however, a slow H/D exchange and formation of (ArN=)Mo(D)(Cl)(PMe(3))(3) (2(D)) was observed upon addition of PhSiD(3). Reactivity of 2 toward organic substrates was studied. Stoichiometric reactions of 2 with benzaldehyde and cyclohexanone start with dissociation of the trans-to-hydride PMe(3) ligand followed by coordination and insertion of carbonyls into the Mo-H bond to form alkoxy derivatives (ArN=)Mo(Cl)(OR)(PMe(2))L(2) (3: R = OCH(2)Ph, L(2) = 2 PMe(3); 5: R = OCH(2)Ph, L(2) = η(2)-PhC(O)H; 6: R = OCy, L(2) = 2 PMe(3)). The latter species reacts with PhSiH(3) to furnish the corresponding silyl ethers and to recover the hydride 2. An analogous mechanism was suggested for the dehydrogenative ethanolysis with PhSiH(3), with the key intermediate being the ethoxy complex (ArN=)Mo(Cl)(OEt)(PMe(3))(3) (7). In the case of hydrosilylation of acetophenone, a D-labeling experiment, i.e., a reaction of 2 with acetophenone and PhSiD(3) in the 1:1:1 ratio, suggests an alternative mechanism that does not involve the intermediacy of an alkoxy complex. In this particular case, the reaction presumably proceeds via Lewis acid catalysis. Similar to the case of benzaldehyde, treatment of 2 with styrene gives trans-(ArN=)Mo(H)(η(2)-CH(2)═CHPh)(PMe(3))(2) (8). Complex 8 slowly decomposes via the release of ethylbenzene, indicating only a slow insertion of styrene ligand into the Mo-H bond of 8.     

Catalytic and stoichiometric reactivity of β-silylamido agostic complex of Mo: intermediacy of a silanimine complex and applications to multicomponent coupling

The reaction of complex (ArN═)(2)Mo(PMe(3))(3) (Ar = 2,6-diisopropylphenyl) with PhSiH(3) gives the β-agostic NSi-H···M silyamido complex (ArN═)Mo(SiH(2)Ph)(PMe(3))(η(3)-ArN-SiHPh-H) (3) as the first product. 3 decomposes in the mother liquor to a mixture of hydride compounds, including complex {η(3)-SiH(Ph)-N(Ar)-SiHPh-H···}MoH(3)(PMe(3))(3) characterized by NMR. Compound 3 was obtained on preparative scale by reacting (ArN═)(2)Mo(PMe(3))(3) with 2 equiv of PhSiH(3) under N(2) purging and characterized by multinuclear NMR, IR, and X-ray diffraction. Analogous reaction of (Ar'N═)(2)Mo(PMe(3))(3) (Ar' = 2,6-dimethylphenyl) with PhSiH(3) affords the nonagostic silylamido derivative (Ar'N═)Mo(SiH(2)Ph)(PMe(3))(2)(NAr'{SiH(2)Ph}) (5) as the first product. 5 decomposes in the mother liquor to a mixture of {η(3)-PhHSi-N(Ar')-SiHPh-H···}MoH(3)(PMe(3))(3), (Ar'N═)Mo(H)(2)(PMe(3))(2)(η(2)-Ar'N═SiHPh), and other hydride species. Catalytic and stoichiometric reactivity of 3 was studied. Complex 3 undergoes exchange with its minor diastereomer 3' by an agostic bond-opening/closing mechanism. It also exchanges the classical silyl group with free silane by an associative mechanism which most likely includes dissociation of the Si-H agostic bond followed by the rate-determining silane σ-bond metathesis. However, labeling experiments suggest the possibility of an alternative (minor) pathway in this exchange including a silanimine intermediate. 3 was found to catalyze dehydrogenative coupling of silane, hydrosilylation of carbonyls and nitriles, and dehydrogenative silylation of alcohols and amines. Stoichiometric reactions of 3 with nitriles proceed via intermediate formation of η(2)-adducts (ArN═)Mo(PMe(3))(η(2)-ArN═SiHPh)(η(2)-N≡CR), followed by an unusual Si-N coupling to give (ArN═)Mo(PMe(3))(κ(2)-NAr-SiHPh-C(R)═N-). Reactions of 3 with carbonyls lead to η(2)-carbonyl adducts (ArN═)(2)Mo(O═CRR')(PMe(3)) which were independently prepared by reactions of (ArN═)(2)Mo(PMe(3))(3) with the corresponding carbonyl O═CRR'. In the case of reaction with benzaldehyde, the silanimine adduct (ArN═)Mo(PMe(3))(η(2)-ArN═SiHPh)(η(2)-O═CHPh) was observed by NMR. Reactions of complex 3 with olefins lead to products of Si(ag)-C coupling, (ArN═)Mo(Et)(PMe(3))(η(3)-NAr-SiHPh-CH═CH(2)) (17) and (ArN═)Mo(H)(PMe(3))(η(3)-NAr-SiHPh-CH═CHPh), for ethylene and styrene, respectively. The hydride complex (ArN═)Mo(H)(PMe(3))(η(3)-NAr-SiHPh-CH═CH(2)) was obtained from 17 by hydrogenation and reaction with PhSiH(3). Mechanistic studies of the latter process revealed an unusual dependence of the rate constant on phosphine concentration, which was explained by competition of two reaction pathways. Reaction of 17 with PhSiH(3) in the presence of BPh(3) leads to agostic complex (ArN═)Mo(SiH(2)Ph)(η(3)-NAr-Si(Et)Ph-H)(η(2)-CH(2)═CH(2)) (24) having the Et substituent at the agostic silicon. Mechanistic studies show that the Et group stems from hydrogenation of the vinyl substituent by silane. Reaction of 24 with PMe(3) gives the agostic complex (ArN═)Mo(SiH(2)Ph)(PMe(3))(η(3)-NAr-Si(Et)Ph-H), which slowly reacts with PhSiH(3) to furnish silylamide 3 and the hydrosilylation product PhEtSiH(2). A mechanism involving silane attack on the imido ligand was proposed to explain this transformation.     

Reactivity of [Mo(NHNRPh)(NNRPh)(acac)X2] (R=Ph,Me; X=Br,I) toward tertiary phosphines

The reactivity of mixed [organohydrazido(1-)][organohydrazido(2-)]molybdenum(VI) complexes [Mo(NHNRPh)(NNRPh)(acac)X₂] {R?=?Ph, X?=?Br (1); R?=?Ph, X?=?I (2) and R?=?Me; X?=?I (3)} with tertiary phosphines as PPh₃, PMePh₂ and PMe₂Ph are examined. The syntheses of [Mo(NNPh₂)₂Br₂(PPh₃)] (4), [Mo(NNPh₂)₂Br₂(PMePh₂)₂] (5), [Mo(NNPh₂)₂Br₂(PMe₂Ph)₂] (6), [Mo(NNPh₂)₂(acac)I(PPh₃)] (7), [Mo(NNPh₂)₂(acac)(PMePh₂)₂]⁺I^? (8) and [Mo(NNMePh)₂(acac)(PMePh₂)₂]⁺I^? (9) are reported. All complexes were characterized by elemental analysis, UV-visible, IR, ¹H and ³¹P{H} NMR spectroscopy.     

Syntheses of Molybdenum and Tungsten Imido Alkylidene Complexes that Contain a Bidentate Oxo/Thiolato Ligand

3,3′,5,5′-Tetra-tert-butyl-2′-sulfanyl[1,1′-biphenyl]-2-ol (H₂[^tBu₄OS]) was prepared in 24 % yield overall from the analogous biphenol using standard techniques. Addition of H₂[^tBu₄OS] to Mo(NAr)(CHCMe₂Ph)(2,5-dimethylpyrrolide)₂ led to formation of Mo(NAr)(CHCMe₂Ph)[^tBu₄OS], which was trapped with PMe₃ to give Mo(NAr)(CHCMe₂Ph)[^tBu₄OS](PMe₃) ( 1 (PMe₃)). An X-ray crystallographic study of 1 (PMe₃) revealed that two structurally distinct square pyramidal molecules are present in which the alkylidene ligand occupies the apical position in each. Both 1 (PMe₃)_A and 1 (PMe₃)_B are disordered. Mo(NAd)(CHCMe₂Ph)(^tBu₄OS)(PMe₃) ( 2 (PMe₃); Ad=1-adamantyl) and W(NAr)(CHCMe₂Ph)(^tBu₄OS)(PMe₃) ( 3 (PMe₃)) were prepared using analogous approaches. 1 (PMe₃) reacts with ethylene (1 atm) in benzene within 45 minutes to give an ethylene complex Mo(NAr)(^tBu₄OS)(C₂H₄) ( 4 ) that is isolable and relatively stable toward loss of ethylene below 60 °C. An X-ray study shows that the bond distances and angles for the ethylene ligand in 4 are like those found for bisalkoxide ethylene complexes of the same general type. Complex 1 (PMe₃) in the presence of one equivalent of B(C₆F₅)₃ catalyzes the homocoupling of 1-decene, allyltrimethylsilane, and allylboronic acid pinacol ester at ambient temperature. 1 (PMe₃), 2 (PMe₃), and 3 (PMe₃) all catalyze the ROMP of rac-endo,exo-5,6-dicarbomethoxynorbornene (rac-DCMNBE) in the presence of B(C₆F₅)₃, but the polyDCMNBE that is formed has a random structure.     

Synthesis and characterization of aluminum(III) and tin(II) complexes supported by diiminophosphinate ligands and their application in ring‐opening polymerization catalysis of ε‐caprolactone

A series of Al(III) and Sn(II) diiminophosphinate complexes have been synthesized. Reaction of Ph(ArCH₂)P(?NBu^t)NHBu^t (Ar = Ph, 3 ; Ar = 8‐quinolyl, 4 ) with AlR₃ (R = Me, Et) gave aluminum complexes [R₂Al{(NBu^t)₂P(Ph)(CH₂Ar)}] (R = Me, Ar = Ph, 5 ; R = Me, Ar = 8‐quinolyl, 6 ; R = Et, Ar = Ph, 7 ; R = Et, Ar = quinolyl, 8 ). Lithiated 3 and 4 were treated with SnCl₂ to afford tin(II) complexes [ClSn{(NBu^t)₂P(Ph)(CH₂Ar)}] (Ar = Ph, 9 ; Ar = 8‐quinolyl, 10 ). Complex 9 was converted to [(Me₃Si)₂NSn{(NBu^t)₂P(Ph)(CH₂Ph)}] ( 11 ) by treatment with LiN(SiMe₃)₂. Complex 11 was also obtained by reaction of 3 with [Sn{N(SiMe₃)₂}₂]. Complex 9 reacted with [LiOC₆H₄Bu^t‐4] to yield [4‐Bu^tC₆H₄OSn{(NBu^t)₂P(Ph)(CH₂Ph)}] ( 12 ). Compounds 3–12 were characterized by NMR spectroscopy and elemental analysis. The structures of complexes 6 , 10 , and 11 were further characterized by single crystal X‐ray diffraction techniques. The catalytic activity of complexes 5–8 , 11 , and 12 toward the ring‐opening polymerization of ε‐caprolactone (CL) was studied. In the presence of BzOH, the complexes catalyzed the ring‐opening polymerization of ε‐CL in the activity order of 5 > 7 ≈ 8 > 6 ? 11 > 12 , giving polymers with narrow molecular weight distributions. The kinetic studies showed a first‐order dependency on the monomer concentration in each case. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 44: 4621–4631, 2006     

Diimido‐, Imido(oxo)‐, Dioxo‐ und Imido(alkyliden)‐Halbsandwich‐Verbindungen über selektive Hydrolyse und α—H‐Abstraktion an Organylkomplexen des sechswertigen Molybdäns und Wolframs

Diimido, Imido Oxo, Dioxo, and Imido Alkylidene Halfsandwich Compounds via Selective Hydrolysis and α—H Abstraction in Molybdenum(VI) and Tungsten(VI) Organyl Complexes Organometal imides [(η⁵‐C₅R₅)M(NR′)₂Ph] (M = Mo, W, R = H, Me, R′ = Mes, tBu) 4 — 8 can be prepared by reaction of halfsandwich complexes [(η⁵‐C₅R₅)M(NR′)₂Cl] with phenyl lithium in good yields. Starting from phenyl complexes 4 — 8 as well as from previously described methyl compounds [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)M(NtBu)₂Me] (M = Mo, W), reactions with aqueous HCl lead to imido(oxo) methyl and phenyl complexes [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)M(NtBu)(O)(R)] M = Mo, R = Me ( 9 ), Ph ( 10 ); M = W, R = Ph ( 11 ) and dioxo complexes [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)M(O)₂(CH₃)] M = Mo ( 12 ), M = W ( 13 ). Hydrolysis of organometal imides with conservation of M‐C σ and π bonds is in fact an attractive synthetic alternative for the synthesis of organometal oxides with respect to known strategies based on the oxidative decarbonylation of low valent alkyl CO and NO complexes. In a similar manner, protolysis of [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)W(NtBu)₂(CH₃)] and [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)Mo(NtBu)₂(CH₃)] by HCl gas leads to [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)W(NtBu)Cl₂(CH₃)] 14 und [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)Mo(NtBu)Cl₂(CH₃)] 15 with conservation of the M‐C bonds. The inert character of the relatively non‐polar M‐C σ bonds with respect to protolysis offers a strategy for the synthesis of methyl chloro complexes not accessible by partial methylation of [(η⁵‐C₅R₅)M(NR′)Cl₃] with MeLi. As pure substances only trimethyl compounds [(η⁵‐C₅R₅)M(NtBu)(CH₃)₃] 16 ‐ 18 , M = Mo, W, R = H, Me, are isolated. Imido(benzylidene) complexes [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)M(NtBu)(CHPh)(CH₂Ph)] M = Mo ( 19 ), W ( 20 ) are generated by alkylation of [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)M(NtBu)Cl₃] with PhCH₂MgCl via α‐H abstraction. Based on nmr data a trend of decreasing donor capability of the ligands [NtBu]^2— > [O]^2— > [CHR]^2— ? 2 [CH₃]^— > 2 [Cl]^— emerges.     

DFT study on mechanism of carbonyl hydrosilylation catalyzed by high-valent molybdenum (IV) hydrides

Density functional theory (DFT) calculations have been employed to investigate hydrosilylation of carbonyl compounds catalyzed by three high-valent molybdenum (VI) hydrides: Mo(NAr)H(Cp)(PMe₃) (1A), Mo(NAr)H(PMe₃)₃ (1B), and Mo(NAr)H (Tp)(PMe₃) (Tp?=?tris(pyrazolyl) borate) (1C). Three independent mechanisms have been explored. The first mechanism is “carbonyl insertion pathway”, in which the carbonyls insert into Mo?H bond to give a metal alkoxide complex. The second mechanism is the “ionic hydrosilylation pathway”, in which the carbonyls nucleophilically attacks η¹-silane molybdenum adduct. The third mechanism is [2 + 2] addition mechanism which was proposed to be favorable for the high-valent di-oxo molybdenum complex MoO₂Cl₂ catalyzing the hydrosilylation. Our studies have identified the “carbonyl insertion pathway” to be the preferable pathway for three molybdenum hydrides catalyzing hydrosilylation of carbonyls. For Mo(NAr)H (Tp)(PMe₃) (Tp?=?tris(pyrazolyl) borate), the proposed nonhydride mechanism experimentally is calculated to be more than 32.6?kcal/mol higher than the “carbonyl insertion pathway”. Our calculation results have derived meaningful mechanistic insights for the high-valent transition metal complexes catalyzing the reduction reaction.     

Hydrido-silyl complexes,Part VIII. Photochemical reaction of [Fe(CO)3H(PR′3)SiR3] with silanes,HSiR3: Influence of PR′3 and SiR3 on formation and structures of bis-silyl complexes [Fe(CO)3(PR′3)(SiR3)2]

Summary Upon u.v. irradiation of [Fe(CO)₄(PR ₃ )] with HSiR₃ (HSiR₃ = HSiMePh₂, PR₃ = PPh₃; HSiR₃ = HSiMe₂Cl, PR₃ = PPh₃ or PMe₂Ph; HSiR₃ = HSiMeCl₂, PR₃ = PPh₃, PMePh₂, PMe₂Ph or PMe₃; HSiR₃ = HSiCl₃, PR₃ = PPh₃, PMePh₂, PMe₂Ph, PMe₃ or PBu ₃ ⁿ ) the corresponding hydridosilyl complexes [Fe(CO)₃H(PR₃)SiR₃] are formed. The complexes have themer configuration with acis disposition of the hydride and the silyl ligands. Prolonged irradiation with an excess of silane results in the formation of bis-silyl complexes [Fe(CO)₃(PR₃)(SiR₃)₂], if electron density at the metal is not too high. Thus, [Fe(CO)₃H(PPh₃)SiMePh₂] and [Fe(CO)₃-H(PMe₂Ph)SiMe₂Cl] can be obtained but not the corresponding bis-silyl complexes. Most bis-silyl complexes are obtained asmer-isomers with acis-arrangement of the silyl ligands. Only for [Fe(CO)₃(PR₃)(SiCl₃)₂] with small phosphine ligands (PR₃ = PMe₃ or PMe₂Ph) is thefac-isomer formed.Part VII of this series, ref. (1).     

Evaluation of Several Molybdenum and Ruthenium Catalysts for the Metathesis Homocoupling of 3‐Methyl‐1‐Butene

We synthesized Mo(NC ₆F₅)(CHCM e₂Ph)(TPPO )(PP hMe₂)Cl (TPPO = 2,3,5,6‐tetraphenylphenoxide), Mo(NC ₆F₅)(CHCM e₂Ph)(TTBTO )(PP hMe₂)Cl (TTBTO = 2,6‐di(3′,5′‐di‐tert‐butylphenyl)phenoxide), and Mo(NC ₆F₅)(CHCM e₂Ph)(TPPO )(PP hMe₂)(CF ₃Pyr) (CF ₃Pyr = 3,4‐bistrifluoromethylpyrrolide), in order to evaluate them as catalysts for the homocoupling of 3‐methyl‐1‐butene. They were compared with Mo(NC ₆F₅)(CHCM e₂Ph)(HMTO )(PP hMe₂)Cl (HMTO = 2,6‐dimesitylphenoxide), Mo(NC ₆F₅)(CHCM e₂Ph)(HIPTO )(PP hMe₂)Cl (HIPTO = 2,6‐di(2′,4′,6′‐triisopropylphenyl)phenoxide), and several other Mo and Ru catalysts. In the best cases turnover numbers (TON s) of 400 – 700 were observed for the homocoupling of 3‐methyl‐1‐butene in a closed vessel (ethylene not removed).     

Basische metalle : XXXVI. Die synthese stabiler hydrido(olefin)rhodium-komplexe und von[C5H5Rh(PMe3)(η3-CH3CHC6H5)]PF6

The complexes C₅H₅Rh(PMe₃)C₂H₃R′ (R′  H, Me, Ph) and C₅H₅Rh(PR₃)C₂H₄(PR₃  PMe₂Ph, PPrⁱ₃) are prepared by reaction of[PMe₃(C₂H₃R/t')RhCl]₂ or [PR₃(C₂H₄)RhCl]₂ and TlC₅H₅, respectively. They react with HBF₄ in ether/propionic anhydride to form the BF₄ salts of the hydrido(olefin)rhodium cations [C₅H₅RhH(C₂H₃R′)PR₃]⁺(R  Me; R′  H, Me and R  Prⁱ; R′  H). From C₅H₅Rh(PMe₃)C₂H₃Ph and CF₃COOH/NH₄PF₆ the η³-benzyl complex [C₅H₅Rh(PMe₃)(η³-CH₃CHC₆H₅)]PF₆ is obtained. The reversibility of the protonation reactions is demonstrated by temperature-dependent NMR spectra and by deuteration experiments. The complexes C₅H₅Rh(PMe₃)C₂H₃R′ (R′  H, Ph) and C₅H₅Rh(PMe₂Ph)C₂H₄ react with CH₃I in ether to give the salts [C₅H₅RhCH₃(C₂H₃R′)PR₃]I which in THF or CH₃NO₂ yield the neutral compounds C₅H₅RhCH₃(PR₃)I.     

Insertion Reactions of [ReH(CO)5–n(PMe3)n] Complexes (n = 2–4) with aldehydes,CO2, and activated acetylenes

The complexes of the type [ReH(CO)_5–n(PMe₃)_n] (n = 4, 3) were reacted with aldehydes, CO₂, and RC?CCOOMe (R = H, Me) to establish a phosphine-substitutional effect on the reactivity of the Re–H bond. In the series 1–3 , benzaldehyde showed conversion with only 3 to afford a (benzyloxy)carbonyltetrakis(trimethylphosphine)rhenium complex 4 . Pyridine-2-carbaldehyde allowed reaction with all hydrides 1–3 . With 1 and 2 , the same dicarbonyl[(pyridin-2-yl)methoxy-O, N]bis(trimethylphosphine)rhenium 5b was formed with the intermediacy of a [(pyridin-2-yl)methoxy-O]-ligated species and extrusion of CO or PMe₃, respectively. The analogous conversion of 3 afforded the carbonyl[(pyridin-2-yl)methoxy-O,N]tris(trimethylphosphine)rhenium ( 1 ) 7b . While 1 did not react with CO₂, 2 and 3 yielded under relatively mild conditions the formato-ligated [Re(HCO₂)(CO)(L)(PMe₃)₃] species ( 8 (L = CO) and 9 (L = PMe₃)). Methyl propiolate and methyl butynoate were transformed, in the presence of 1 , to [Re{C(CO₂Me)?CHR}(CO)₃(PMe₃)₂] systems ( 10a (R = H), and 10b (R = Me)), with prevailing α-metallation and trans-insertion stereochemistry. Similarly, HC≡CCO₂Me afforded with 2 and 3 , the α-metallation products [Re{C(CO₂Me)?CH₂}(CO)(L)(PMe₃)₃] 11 (L = CO) and 12 (L = PMe₃). The methyl butyonate insertion into 2 resulted in formation of a mixture of the (Z)- and (E)-isomers of [Re{C(CO₂Me)?CHMe} (CO)₂(PMe₃)₃] ( 13a , b ). In the case of the conversion of 3 with MeC?CCO₂Me, a Re–H cis-addition product [Re{(E)-C(CO₂Me)?CHMe}(CO)(PMe₃)₄] ( 14 ) was selectively obtained. Complex 11 was characterized by an X-ray crystal-structure analysis.     

Further studies on organonickel compounds: the synthesis of some new alkyl-, acyl- and cyclopentadienyl-derivatives and the crystal structure of trans-[Ni(CH2SiMe3)2(PMe3)2]

The complex [NiCl₂(PMe₃)₂] reacts with one equivalent of mg(CH₂CMe₃)Cl to yield the monoalkyl derivative trans-[Ni(CH₂CMe₃)Cl(PMe₃)₂], which can be carbonylated at room temperature and pressure to afford the acyl [Ni(COCH₂CMe₃)Cl(PMe₃)₂]. Other related alkyl and acyl complexes of composition [Ni(R)(NCS)(PMe₃)₂] (R = CH₂CMe₃, COCH₂CMe₃) and [Ni(R)(η-C₅H₅)L] (L = PMe₃, R = CH₂CMe₃, COCH₂CMe₃; L = PPh₃, R = CH₂CMe₂Ph) have been similarly prepared. Dialkyl derivatives [NiR₂(dmpe)] (R = CH₂SiMe₃, CH₂CMe₂Ph; dmpe = 1,2-bis(dimethylphosphine)ethane, Me₂PCH₂ CH₂PMe₂) have been obtained by phosphine replacement of the labile pyridine and NNN′N′-tetramethylethylenediamine ligands in the corresponding [Ni(CH₂SiMe₃)₂(py)₂] and [Ni(CH₂CMe₂Ph)₂(tmen)] complexes. A single-crystal X-ray determination carried out on the previously reported trimethylphosphine derivative [Ni(CH₂SiMe₃)₂(PMe₃)₂] shows the complex belongs to the orthorhombic space group Pbcn, with a = 14.345(4), b = 12.656(3), c = 12.815(3) Å, Z = 4 and R 0.077 for 535 independent observed reflections. The phosphine ligands occupy mutually trans positions P-Ni-P 146.9(3)° in a distorted square-planar arrangement.     

Synthesis,Structure, and Reactivity of Hydridoiridium Complexes Bearing a Pincer‐Type PSiP Ligand

A series of iridium tetrahydride complexes [Ir(H)₄(PSiP‐R)] bearing a tridentate pincer‐type bis(phosphino)silyl ligand ([{2‐(R₂P)C₆H₄}₂MeSi]⁻, PSiP‐R, R=Cy, iPr, or tBu) were synthesized by the reduction of [IrCl(H)(PSiP‐R)] with Me₄N ⋅ BH₄ under argon. The same reaction under a nitrogen atmosphere afforded a rare example of thermally stable iridium(III)–dinitrogen complexes, [Ir(H)₂(N₂)(PSiP‐R)]. Two isomeric dinitrogen complexes were produced, in which the PSiP ligand coordinated to the iridium center in meridional and facial orientations, respectively. Attempted substitution of the dinitrogen ligand in [Ir(H)₂(N₂)(PSiP‐Cy)] with PMe₃ required heating at 150 °C to give the expected [Ir(H)₂(PMe₃)(PSiP‐Cy)] and a trigonal bipyramidal iridium(I)–dinitrogen complex, [Ir(N₂)(PMe₃)(PSiP‐Cy)]. The reaction of [Ir(H)₄(PSiP‐Cy)] with three equivalents of 2‐norbornene (nbe) in benzene afforded [Ir^I(nbe)(PSiP‐Cy)] in a high yield, while a similar reaction of [Ir(H)₄(PSiP‐R)] with an excess of 3,3‐dimethylbutene (tbe) in benzene gave the C H bond activation product, [Ir^III(H)(Ph)(PSiP‐R)], in high yield. The oxidative addition of benzene is reversible; heating [Ir^III(H)(Ph)(PSiP‐Cy)] in the presence of PPh₃ in benzene resulted in reductive elimination of benzene, coordination of PPh₃, and activation of the C H bond of one aromatic ring in PPh₃. [Ir^III(H)(Ph)(PSiP‐R)] catalyzed a direct borylation reaction of the benzene C H bond with bis(pinacolato)diboron. Molecular structures of most of the new complexes in this study were determined by a single‐crystal X‐ray analysis.     

Silylhydrazine und dimere N,N′‐Dilithium‐N,N′‐bis(silyl)hydrazide – Synthesen,Reaktionen, Isomerisierungen

Silylhydrazines and Dimeric N,N′‐Dilithium‐N,N′‐bis(silyl)hydrazides – Syntheses, Reactions, Isomerisations Di‐tert.‐butylchlorosilane reacts with dilithiated hydrazine in a molar ratio to give the N,N′‐bis(silyl)hydrazine, [(Me₃C)₂SiHNH]₂, ( 5 ). Isomeric tris(silyl)hydrazines, N‐difluorophenylsilyl‐N′,N′‐bis(dimethylphenylsilyl)hydrazine ( 7 ) and N‐difluorophenylsilyl‐N,N′‐bis(dimethylphenylsilyl)hydrazine ( 8 ) are formed in the reaction of N‐lithium‐N′‐N′‐bis(dimethylphenylsilyl)hydrazide and F₃SiPh. Isomeric bis(silyl)hydrazines, (Me₃C)₂SiFNHNHSiMe₂Ph ( 9 ) and (Me₃C)₂‐ SiF(PhMe₂Si)N–NH₂ ( 10 ) are the result of the reaction of di‐tert.‐butylfluorosilylhydrazine and ClSiMe₂Ph in the presence of Et₃N. Quantum chemical calculations for model compounds demonstrate the dyotropic course of the rearrangement. The monolithium derivative of 5 forms a N‐lithium‐N′,N′‐bis(silyl)hydrazide ( 11 ). The dilithium salts of 5 ( 13 ) and of the bis(tert.‐butyldiphenylsilyl)hydrazine ( 12 ) crystallize as dimers with formation of a central Li₄N₄ unit. The formation of 12 from 11 occurs via a N′ → N‐silyl group migration. Results of crystal structure analyses are reported.     

[CpR(OC)Mo(μ‐η2:2‐P2)2FeCpR′] als Edukt für heterobimetallische Zweikerncluster mit P2‐ und CnRnP4‐n‐Liganden (n = 1, 2)

[Cp^R(OC)Mo(μ‐η^2:2‐P₂)₂FeCp^R′] as Educt for Heterobimetallic Dinuclear Clusters with P₂ and C_nR_nP_4‐n Ligands (n = 1, 2) The cothermolysis of [Cp^R(OC)Mo(μ‐η^2:2‐P₂)₂FeCp^R′] ( 1 ) and tBuC≡P ( 2 ) as well as PhC≡CPh ( 3 ) affords the heterobimetallic triple‐decker like dinuclear clusters [(Cp'''Mo)(Cp*′Fe)(P₃CtBu)(P₂)] ( 4 ), Cp''' = C₅H₂tBu₃‐1,2,4, Cp*′ = C₅Me₄Et, and [(Cp*Mo)(Cp*Fe)(P₂C₂Ph₂)(P₂)] ( 5 ) with a bridging tri‐ and diphosphabutadiendiyl ligand. 4 and 5 have been characterized additionally by X‐ray crystallography.     

Synthesis,Structural Characterization and Reactivity of a Bis(phosphine)(silyl) Platinum(II) Complex

Treatment of 1,2‐C₆H₄(SiH₃)(SiH₃) ( 1 ) with Pt(dmpe)(PEt₃)₂ (dmpe=Me₂PCH₂CH₂PMe₂) in the ratio of 1:1 leads to the complex {1,2‐C₆H₄(SiH₂)(SiH₂)}Pt^II (dmpe) ( 2 ), which can react with proton organic reagent bearing hydroxy group with low steric hindrance to form a tetra‐alkoxy substituted silyl platinum(II) compound ( 3 ). Compounds 2 and 3 are the very rare examples of silyl transition‐metal complexes derived from this chelating hydrosilane ligand. To the best of our knowledge, there are only 6 examples of silyl metal complexes prepared from this ligand with such structural features registered in the Cambridge Structural Database, among them, only one silyl platinum(II) compound is presented. The structures of complexes 2 and 3 were unambiguously determined by multinuclear NMR spectroscopic studies and single crystal X‐ray analysis.     

Syntheses and Characterization of New Vinyl‐Borylene Complexes by the Hydroboration of Alkynes with [(μ3‐BH)(Cp*RuCO)2(μ‐CO)Fe(CO)3]

Room temperature photolysis of a triply‐bridged borylene complex, [(μ₃‐BH)(Cp*RuCO)₂(μ‐CO)Fe(CO)₃] ( 1 a ; Cp*=C₅Me₅), in the presence of a series of alkynes, 1,2‐diphenylethyne, 1‐phenyl‐1‐propyne, and 2‐butyne led to the isolation of unprecedented vinyl‐borylene complexes (Z)‐[(Cp*RuCO)₂(μ‐CO)B(CR)(CHR′)] ( 2 : R, R′=Ph; 3 : R=Me, R′=Ph; 4 : R, R′=Me). This reaction permits a hydroboration of alkyne through an anti ‐ Markovnikov addition. In stark contrast, in the presence of phenylacetylene, a metallacarborane, closo‐[1,2‐(Cp*Ru)₂(μ‐CO)₂{Fe₂(CO)₅}‐4‐Ph‐4,5‐C₂BH₂] ( 5 a) , is formed. A plausible mechanism has been proposed for the formation of vinyl‐borylene complexes, which is supported by density functional theory (DFT) methods. Furthermore, the calculated ¹¹B NMR chemical shifts accurately reflect the experimentally measured shifts. All the new compounds have been characterized in solution by mass spectrometry and IR, ¹H, ¹¹B, and ¹³C NMR spectroscopies and the structural types were unequivocally established by crystallographic analysis of 2 , 5 a , and 5 b .     

Substituted cyclopentadienyl ligands—10. Intramolecular steric interactions in [(η-C5H3(SiMe3)2)Mo(CO)2(L)I]

Reaction of C₅H₄(SiMe₃)₂ with Mo(CO)₆ yielded [(η⁵-C₅H₃(SiMe₃)₂)Mo(CO)₃]₂, which on addition of iodine gave [(η⁵-C₅H₃(SiMe₃)₂Mo(CO)₃I]. Carbonyl displacement by a range of ligands: [L  P(OMe)₃, P(OPrⁱ)₃,P(O-o-tol)₃, PMe₃, PMe₂Ph, PMePh₂, PPh₃, P(m-tol)₃] gave the new complexes [(η⁵-C₅H₃(SiMe₃)₂ MO(CO)₂(L)I]. For all the trans isomer was the dominant, if not exclusive, isomer formed in the reaction. An NOE spectral analysis of [(η⁵-C₅H₃(SiMe₃)₂)Mo(CO)₂(L)I] L  PMe₂Ph, P(OMe)₃] revealed that the L group resided on the sterically uncongested side of the cyclopentadienyl ligand and that the ligand did not access the congested side of the molecule. Quantification of this phenomenon [L  P(OMe)₃] was achieved by means of the vertex angle of overlap methodology. This methodology revealed a steric preference with the trans isomer (less congestion of CO than I with an SiMe₃ group) being the more stable isomer for L  P(OMe)₃.     

An unexpected mechanism of hydrosilylation by a silyl hydride complex of molybdenum

Carbonyl hydrosilylation catalyzed by (ArN)Mo(H)(SiH(2)Ph)(PMe(3))(3) (3) is unusual in that it does not involve the expected Si-O elimination from intermediate (ArN)Mo(SiH(2)Ph)(O(i)Pr)(PMe(3))(2) (7). Instead, 7 reversibly transfers β-CH hydrogen from the alkoxide ligand to metal.     

An Alternative Mechanistic Paradigm for the β‐Z Hydrosilylation of Terminal Alkynes: The Role of Acetone as a Silane Shuttle

The β‐Z selectivity in the hydrosilylation of terminal alkynes has been hitherto explained by introduction of isomerisation steps in classical mechanisms. DFT calculations and experimental observations on the system [M(I)₂{κ‐C,C,O,O‐(bis‐NHC)}]BF₄ (M=Ir ( 3 a ), Rh ( 3 b ); bis‐NHC=methylenebis(N‐2‐methoxyethyl)imidazole‐2‐ylidene) support a new mechanism, alternative to classical postulations, based on an outer‐sphere model. Heterolytic splitting of the silane molecule by the metal centre and acetone (solvent) affords a metal hydride and the oxocarbenium ion [R₃Si? O(CH₃)₂]⁺, which reacts with the corresponding alkyne in solution to give the silylation product [R₃Si? CH?C? R]⁺. Thus, acetone acts as a silane shuttle by transferring the silyl moiety from the silane to the alkyne. Finally, nucleophilic attack of the hydrido ligand over [R₃Si? CH?C? R]⁺ affords selectively the β‐(Z)‐vinylsilane. The β‐Z selectivity is explained on the grounds of the steric interaction between the silyl moiety and the ligand system resulting from the geometry of the approach that leads to β‐(E)‐vinylsilanes.