Reaction of 1-(dimethylsilyl)-2-silylbenzene with platinum(0) phosphine complex: Isolation and characterization of the Si3-Pt-H complex

Reaction of two equivalents of 1,2-C₆H₄(SiMe₂H)(SiH₃) with Pt(depe)(PEt₃)₂ (depe = Et₂PCH₂CH₂PEt₂) in toluene at room temperature afforded two novel isomeric {1,2-C₆H₄ -(SiMe₂H)(SiH₂)}{1,2-C₆H₄(SiMe₂)(SiH₂)}(H)Pt^IV (depe) complexes 1 and 2 in 5:1 ratio among eight possible isomers. Complex 1 is one of the few examples of tris(silyl)(hydrido)platinum(IV) complexes structurally characterized by single crystal X-ray analysis. The structure of complex 1 was unambiguously determined by multinuclear NMR and single crystal X-ray analysis.     

1,2- and 1,7-Dicarba-closo-dodecarborane(12)platinum(II) complexes formed through metal—carbon σ bonds: cis- and trans-monohydrido derivatives

New neutral platinum(II) monohydridocarborane complexes of general formula cis- and trans-L₂PtH(σ-carb), where L = (C₂H₅)₃P, (C₆H₅)₃P, (C₆H₅)₂(CH₃)P, (C₆H₅)(CH₃)₂P and carb = 2-R-1,2- or 7-R-1,7-B₁₀C₂H₁₀^? (R = H, CH₃, C₆H₅), have been prepared. The configurations of the complexes obtained have been assigned by ¹H NMR spectroscopy. The _cis-monohydridocarborane complexes here reported are the first examples of neutral _cis-monohydrido derivates of platinum(II) containing platinum—carbon σ bonds. ¹H NMR chemical shifts and coupling constants of the prepared complexes are also reported, and used in a tentative evaluation of the _trans-influence of the carbonage ligands.     

Unusual Structure,Fluxionality, and Reaction Mechanism of Carbonyl Hydrosilylation by Silyl Hydride Complex [(ArN)Mo(H)(SiH2Ph)(PMe3)3]

The reactions of bis(borohydride) complexes [(RN?)Mo(BH₄)₂(PMe₃)₂] ( 4 : R=2,6‐Me₂C₆H₃; 5 : R=2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃) with hydrosilanes afford new silyl hydride derivatives [(RN?)Mo(H)(SiR′₃)(PMe₃)₃] ( 3 : R=Ar, R′₃=H₂Ph; 8 : R=Ar′, R′₃=H₂Ph; 9 : R=Ar, R′₃=(OEt)₃; 10 : R=Ar, R′₃=HMePh). These compounds can also be conveniently prepared by reacting [(RN?)Mo(H)(Cl)(PMe₃)₃] with one equivalent of LiBH₄ in the presence of a silane. Complex 3 undergoes intramolecular and intermolecular phosphine exchange, as well as exchange between the silyl ligand and the free silane. Kinetic and DFT studies show that the intermolecular phosphine exchange occurs through the predissociation of a PMe₃ group, which, surprisingly, is facilitated by the silane. The intramolecular exchange proceeds through a new non‐Bailar‐twist pathway. The silyl/silane exchange proceeds through an unusual Mo^VI intermediate, [(ArN?)Mo(H)₂(SiH₂Ph)₂(PMe₃)₂] ( 19 ). Complex 3 was found to be the catalyst of a variety of hydrosilylation reactions of carbonyl compounds (aldehydes and ketones) and nitriles, as well as of silane alcoholysis. Stoichiometric mechanistic studies of the hydrosilylation of acetone, supported by DFT calculations, suggest the operation of an unexpected mechanism, in that the silyl ligand of compound 3 plays an unusual role as a spectator ligand. The addition of acetone to compound 3 leads to the formation of [trans‐(ArN)Mo(OiPr)(SiH₂Ph)(PMe₃)₂] ( 18 ). This latter species does not undergo the elimination of a Si? O group (which corresponds to the conventional Ojima′s mechanism of hydrosilylation). Rather, complex 18 undergoes unusual reversible β‐CH activation of the isopropoxy ligand. In the hydrosilylation of benzaldehyde, the reaction proceeds through the formation of a new intermediate bis(benzaldehyde) adduct, [(ArN?)Mo(η²‐PhC(O)H)₂(PMe₃)], which reacts further with hydrosilane through a η¹‐silane complex, as studied by DFT calculations.     

Synthesis and Analysis of the Structure,Diffusion and Cytotoxicity of Heterocyclic Platinum(IV) Complexes

We have developed six dihydroxidoplatinum(IV) compounds with cytotoxic potential. Each derived from active platinum(II) species, these complexes consist of a heterocyclic ligand (H_L) and ancillary ligand (A_L) in the form [Pt(H_L)(A_L)(OH)₂]²⁺, where H_L is a methyl‐functionalised variant of 1,10‐phenanthroline and A_L is the S,S or R,R isomer of 1,2‐diaminocyclohexane. NMR characterisation and X‐ray diffraction studies clearly confirmed the coordination geometry of the octahedral platinum(IV) complexes. The self‐stacking of these complexes was determined using pulsed gradient stimulated echo nuclear magnetic resonance. The self‐association behaviour of square planar platinum(II) complexes is largely dependent on concentration, whereas platinum(IV) complexes do not aggregate under the same conditions, possibly due to the presence of axial ligands. The cytotoxicity of the most active complex, exhibited in several cell lines, has been retained in the platinum(IV) form.     

Crystal structure and DFT calculations of Cp2NbH(SiIMe2)(SiFMe2): an asymmetric bis(silyl) niobocene hydride complex

An asymmetric bis(silyl) niobocene hydride complex, namely, bis(η⁵-cyclopentadienyl)(fluorodimethylsilyl)hydrido(iododimethylsilyl)niobium, [Nb(C₅H₅)₂(C₂H₆FSi)(C₂H₆ISi)H] or Cp₂NbH(SiIMe₂)(SiFMe₂), has been studied to determine the effect of the silyl ligand on the position of the hydride attached to the Nb atom. It has been shown that when a Group 17 atom is substituted onto one of the silyl ligands, there is a greater interaction between the hydride and this ligand, as demonstrated by a shorter Si…H distance. In the present work, we have investigated the effect when the silyl ligands are substituted by different Group 17 atoms. We present here the structure and DFT calculations of Cp₂NbH(SiIMe₂)(SiFMe₂), showing that the position of the hydride is located between the two silyl ligands. The results from our investigation show that the hydride is closer to the silyl ligand that is substituted by fluorine.     

(n‐Butyl­di­phenyl­phosphine)­di­chloro(η6‐p‐cymeme)­ruthenium(II)

The title ruthenium complex, [RuCl₂(C₁₀H₁₄)(C₁₆H₁₉P)], contains a monodentate (C₄H₉)PPh₂ ligand coordinated by the P atom. Coordination about the metal centre is completed by a η⁶‐p‐cymene ligand and two Cl atoms.     

Activation of 1, 2‐Dihydrodisilanes at Platinum(0) Phosphine Complexes: Syntheses and Structures of Bissilyl Platinum(II) Complexes

The bissilyl complexes 3 – 6 were synthesized by reactions of the platinum(0) complexes [Pt(η²‐C₂H₄)(diphos)] ( 1 : diphos = dppe; 2 : diphos = dcpe) with the disilanes 1, 1,2, 2‐tetramethyldisilane and 1, 1,2, 2‐tetraphenyldisilane via Si–Si bond activation. The molecular structures of 4 and 5 in the solid state are reported. The reaction of 2 with HPh₂SiSiPh₂H led to the immediate formation of the hydrido disilanyl complex [Pt(H)(SiPh₂SiPh₂H)(dcpe)] ( 7 ), which converts slowly into the bissilyl complex [Pt(SiHPh₂)₂(dcpe)] ( 6 ). The latter was reported before to be a η²‐disilene complex.     

Hydrogen‐bonded chains in three cis‐dichloridoplatinum(II) complexes bearing piperidine and amine ligands

The crystal structures of cis‐dichlorido(ethylamine‐κN)(piperidine‐κN)platinum(II), [PtCl₂(C₂H₇N)(C₅H₁₁N)], (I), cis‐dichlorido(3‐methoxyaniline‐κN)(piperidine‐κN)platinum(II), [PtCl₂(C₅H₁₁N)(C₇H₉NO)], (II), and cis‐dichlorido(piperidine‐κN)(quinoline‐κN)platinum(II), [PtCl₂(C₅H₁₁N)(C₉H₇N)], (III), have been determined at 100 K in order to verify the influence of the nonpiperidine ligand on the geometry and crystal packing. The crystal packing is characterized by N—H...Cl hydrogen bonding, resulting in the formation of chains of molecules connected in a head‐to‐tail fashion. Hydrogen‐bonding interactions play a major role in the packing of (I), where the chains further aggregate into planes, but less so in the case of (II) and (III), where π–π stacking interactions are of greater importance.     

μ‐1,2‐Bis(4‐pyridyl)ethene‐κ2N:N′‐bis(tetraaqua­{4‐[2‐(4‐pyridinio)­ethenyl]pyridine‐κN}cobalt(II)) hexaaqua­cobalt(II) tetrakis(sulfate) octahydrate

The title compound, [Co₂(C₁₂H₁₁N₂)₂(C₁₂H₁₀N₂)(H₂O)₈][Co(H₂O)₆](SO₄)₄·8H₂O, consists of bis(4‐pyridyl)ethenedicobalt(II) cations, hexaaqua­cobalt cations, sulfate anions and water solvent molecules that are linked by hydrogen bonds into a network structure. In the hexaaquacobalt cation, the six water molecules are coordinated in an octahedral geometry to the Co atom, which lies on an inversion centre. The other cation is a 1,2‐bis(4‐pyridyl)ethene‐bridged centrosymmetric dimer, consisting of protonated 1,2‐bis(4‐pyridyl)­ethene cations, a bridging 1,2‐bis(4‐pyridyl)ethene ligand and tetraaqua­cobalt cations. Each Co atom is six‐coordinated by four water molecules and two N atoms from a protonated 1,2‐bis(4‐pyridyl)ethene cation and the bridging 1,2‐bis(4‐pyridyl)­ethene ligand, and the geometry around each Co atom is octahedral.     

Ta(CNDipp)6: An Isocyanide Analogue of Hexacarbonyltantalum(0)

Hexakis(2,6‐diisopropylphenylisocyanide)tantalum is the first isocyanide analogue of the highly unstable Ta(CO)₆ and represents the only well‐defined zerovalent tantalum complex to be prepared by conventional laboratory methods. Two prior examples of homoleptic Ta⁰ complexes are known, Ta(benzene)₂ and Ta(dmpe)₃, dmpe=1,2‐bis(dimethylphosphano)ethane, but these have only been accessed via ligand co‐condensation with tantalum vapor in a sophisticated metal‐atom reactor. Consistent with its 17‐electron nature, Ta(CNDipp)₆ undergoes facile one‐electron oxidation, reduction, or disproportionation reactions. In this sense, it qualitatively resembles V(CO)₆, the only paramagnetic homoleptic metal carbonyl isolable under ambient conditions.     

Aqua­bis(3‐meth­oxy‐2‐pyridonato)­(2,2′:6′,2′′‐terpyridine)ruthenium(II)–acetonitrile–water (1/1/1)

The title compound, [Ru(C₆H₆NO₂)₂(C₁₅H₁₁N₃)(H₂O)]·CH₃CN·H₂O, is a transfer hydrogenation catalyst supported by nitro­gen‐donor ligands. This octa­hedral Ru^II complex features rare monodentate coordination of 3‐meth­oxy‐2‐pyridonate ligands and inter­ligand S(6)S(6) hydrogen bonding. Comparison of the title complex with a structural analog with unsubstituted 2‐pyridonate ligands reveals subtle differences in the orientation of the ligand planes.     

Syntheses and Structures of trans-bis(Alkenylacetylide) Ruthenium Complexes

A series of ruthenium alkenylacetylide complexes trans-[Ru{C≡CC(=CH₂)R}Cl(dppe)₂] (R=Ph ( 1 a ), ^cC₄H₃S ( 1 b ), 4-MeS-C₆H₄ ( 1 c ), 3,3-dimethyl-2,3-dihydrobenzo[b]thiophene (DMBT) ( 1 d )) or trans-[Ru{C≡C-^cC₆H₉}Cl(dppe)₂] ( 1 e ) were allowed to react with the corresponding propargylic alcohol HC≡CC(Me)R(OH) (R=Ph ( A ), ^cC₄H₃S ( B ), 4-MeS-C₆H₄ ( C ), DMBT ( D ) or HC≡C-^cC₆H₁₀(OH) ( E ) in the presence of TlBF₄ and DBU to presumably give alkenylacetylide/allenylidene intermediates trans-[Ru{C≡CC(=CH₂)R}{C=C=C(Me)}(dppe)₂]PF₆ ([ 2 ]PF₆). These complexes were not isolated but deprotonated to give the isolable bis(alkenylacetylide) complexes trans-[Ru{C≡CC(=CH₂)R}₂(dppe)₂] (R=Ph ( 3 a ), ^cC₄H₃S ( 3 b ), 4-MeS-C₆H₄ ( 3 c ), DMBT ( 3 d )) and trans-[Ru{C≡C-^cC₆H₉}₂(dppe)₂] ( 3 e ). Analogous reactions of trans-[Ru(CH₃)₂(dmpe)₂], featuring the more electron-donating 1,2-bis(dimethylphosphino)ethane (dmpe) ancillary ligands, with the propargylic alcohols A or C and NH₄PF₆ in methanol allowed isolation of the intermediate mixed alkenylacetylide/allenylidene complexes trans-[Ru{C≡CC(=CH₂)R}{C=C=C(Me)}(dmpe)₂]PF₆ (R=Ph ([ 4 a ]PF₆), 4-MeS-C₆H₄ ([ 4 c ]PF₆). Deprotonation of [ 4 a ]PF₆ or [ 4 c ]PF₆ gave the symmetric bis(alkenylacetylide) complexes trans-[Ru{C≡CC(=CH₂)R}₂(dmpe)₂] (R=Ph ( 5 a ), 4-MeS-C₆H₄ ( 5 c )), the first of their kind containing the dmpe ancillary ligand sphere. Attempts to isolate bis(allenylidene) complexes [Ru{C=C=C(Me)R}₂(PP)₂]²⁺ (PP=dppe, dmpe) from treatment of the bis(alkenylacetylide) species 3 or 5 with HBF₄ ⋅ Et₂O were ultimately unsuccessful.     

Platinum trans‐Bis(borirene) Complexes Displaying Coplanarity and Communication Across a Platinum Metal Center

Ambient‐temperature photolysis of the aminoborylene complex [(OC)₅Cr?B?N(SiMe₃)₂] in the presence of a series of trans‐bis(alkynyl)platinum(II) precursors of the type trans‐[Pt(CCAr)₂(PEt₃)₂] (Ar=Ph, p‐C₆H₄OMe, and p‐C₆H₄CF₃) successfully leads to twofold transfer of the borylene moiety [ : B?N(SiMe₃)₂] onto the alkyne functionalities. The alkynyl precursors and resultant bis(borirene)platinum(II) complexes formed are of the type trans‐[Pt(B{?N(SiMe₃)₂}C?CAr)₂(PEt₃)₂] (Ar=Ph, p‐C₆H₄OMe, and p‐C₆H₄CF₃). These species have all been successfully characterized by NMR, IR, and UV/Vis spectroscopy as well as by elemental analysis. Single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction has verified that these trans‐bis(borirene)platinum(II) complexes display coplanarity between the twin three‐membered rings across the platinum core in the solid state and stand as the first examples of coplanar conformations of twin borirene systems. These complexes were modeled using density functional theory (DFT), providing information helpful in determining the ability of the transition metal core to interact with each individual borirene ring system and allowing for the observed coplanarity of these rings in the solid state. This proposed transition metal interaction with the twin borirene systems is manifested in the electronic characterization of these borirene species, which display divergent photophysical UV/Vis spectroscopic profiles compared to a previously published mono(borirene)platinum(II) complex.     

Zinc(II) and Nickel(II) Complexes Based on Schiff Base Ligands: Synthesis,Crystal Structure,Luminescent and Magnetic Properties

Three new phenolate oxygen bridged transition metal complexes [Zn₃(HL¹)₃(μ₃‐CH₃O)]·(ClO₄)₂(H₂O)₃ ( 1 ), [Ni₂(HL¹)₂(μ_1,1‐N₃)(o‐vanillin)]·H₂O ( 2 ), [Ni₃(HL²)₂(PhCOO)₂(PhCOOH)₂(EtOH)₂] ( 3 ) have been synthesized by metal ions and potentially multidentate Schiff base ligands (H₂L¹ = 2‐((1‐hydroxy‐2‐methylpropan‐2‐ylimino) methyl)‐6‐methoxyphenol; H₃L² = (E)‐1‐((2‐hydroxy‐3‐methoxy‐benzylidene)amino)ethane‐1,2‐diol). All the three complexes 1 , 2 , and 3 have been characterized by elemental analysis, FT‐IR spectroscopy, and single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction studies. Crystal structures reveal that complex 1 is a trinuclear incomplete cubane‐like zinc cluster whereas complex 2 is a dinuclear nickel complex bridged by azide, and compound 3 is a trinuclear nickel complex. The luminescent property for complex 1 and magnetic behaviors for complexes 2 and 3 have been investigated.     

Carbon—carbon formation at a diiron centre by intramolecular coupling of ethoxycarbyne and 1,2-diphenylethenyl ligands in Fe2(CO)6(μ-COC2H5)(μ-C(C6H5)C(C6H5)H). X-ray crystal structure of hexacarbonyl-μ-(1η2,2-diphenyl- 3-ethoxy-η3η1-allyl)-diiron

[Fe₂(CO)₆(μ-CO)(μ-C(C₆H₅)C(C₆H₅)H)]^? reacts with triethyloxonium tetrafluoroborate to yield Fe₂(CO)₆(μ-COC₂H₅)(μ-C(C₆H₅)C(C₆H₅)H). This compound is smoothly transformed at room temperature or more quickly in refluxing hexane into the title compound resulting from the coupling of the ethoxycarbyne and 1,2-diphenylethenyl bridges.     

Structural studies on platinum alkene complexes and precursors

A number of platinum complexes, precursors to alkene complexes (Pt₂Cl₄(PPh₃)₂ and cis-PtCl₂(CH₃CN)(PPh₃)), alkene complexes (cis-PtCl₂(C₂H₄)(PPh₃), cis-PtCl₂(C₃H₆)(PPh₃) and cis-PtCl₂(1-C₆H₁₂)(PPh₃)), the diamination product of a 1,3-butadiene platinum complex and the 1,2,3,4-tetramethylcyclobutadiene complex resulting from dimerization of 2-butyne have been synthesized, characterized and the structures determined by X-ray diffraction. The ethylene complex, cis-PtCl₂(C₂H₄)(PPh₃), has been a useful reagent for preparing other alkene complexes. Reaction of a bound butadiene complex with diethylamine yielded a diamination product with anti-Markovnikov stereochemistry. An attempt at binding cis-butyne to the metal center resulted in metal-assisted formation of 1,2,3,4-tetramethylcyclobutadiene with previously unreported geometry.     

Fast atom bombardment mass spectrometry of non-volatile organometallic compounds. Rhodium,iridium and platinum complexes containing a cumulene ligand

Fast atom bombardment (FAB) mass spectrometry has been used to examine a series of rhodium, iridium and platinum organimetallic complexes, in which a cumulene ligand is attached to the metal in either σ-or π-bonding fashion. The most intense ion formed in the rhodium and platinum series is the metal-bis(triphenylphosphine) ion, while the [Ir(P(C₆H₅)₃)₂CO]⁺ ion is most intense for the iridium series. The platinum complexes show the most intense molecular ion peaks (up to 35% relative intensity), while the rhodium complexes show the least intense molecular ion peaks. The primary fragmentations of all these complexes occur at the metal-ligand bonds. The cumulenic ligand is lost as an impact unit in all cases. The FAB mass spectra of Rh(P(C₆H₅)₃)₃Cl (Wilkinson's catalyst), Ir(P(C₆H₅)₃)₂COCl (Vaska's compound), Rh(P(C₆H₅)₃)₂COCl and Pt(P(C₆H₅)₃)₂(C₂H₄)–synthetic precursors or related compounds to the organometallic complexes examined here–are included for comparison.     

(η6‐Hexamethylbenzene)(mesidine)­ditriflatoruthenium(II)

The crystal structure of the title complex, (η⁶‐hexamethylbenzene)bis(trifluoromethanesulfonato‐O)(2,4,6‐trimethylanil­ine‐N)ruthenium(II), [Ru(CF₃O₃S)₂(C₁₂H₁₈)(C₉H₁₃N)], is described. The complex has the classic three‐legged piano‐stool structure with a planar arene 1.667 Å from the metal, two monodentate O‐bound tri­fluoro­methane­sulfonate ligands [Ru—O 2.169 (2) and 2.174 (2) Å] and one N‐bound mesidine ligand [Ru—N 2.198 (2) Å]. The Ru—N distance is relatively long and the average Ru—O distance is relatively short when compared with previously characterized Ru^II complexes.     

Bis(μ‐benzene‐1,2‐dicarboxylato)bis{aqua[2‐(2‐chloro‐6‐fluorophenyl)‐1H‐imidazo[4,5‐f][1,10]phenanthroline]cadmium(II)} and its zinc(II) analogue

In the isomorphous title compounds, [Cd₂(C₈H₄O₄)₂(C₁₉H₁₀ClFN₄)₂(H₂O)₂] and [Zn₂(C₈H₄O₄)₂(C₁₉H₁₀ClFN₄)₂(H₂O)₂], the Cd^II centre is seven‐coordinated by two N atoms from one [2‐(2‐chloro‐6‐fluorophenyl)‐1H‐imidazo[4,5‐f][1,10]phenanthroline (L) ligand, one water O atom and four carboxylate O atoms from two different benzene‐1,2‐dicarboxylate (1,2‐bdc) ligands in a distorted pentagonal–bipyramidal coordination, while the Zn^II centre is six‐coordinated by two N atoms from one L ligand, one water O atom and three carboxylate O atoms from two different 1,2‐bdc ligands in a distorted octahedral coordination. Each pair of adjacent metal centres is bridged by two 1,2‐bdc ligands to form a dimeric structure. In the dimer, each L ligand coordinates one metal centre. The dimer is centrosymmetric, with a crystallographic inversion centre midway between the two metal centres. The aromatic interactions lead the dimers to form a two‐dimensional supramolecular architecture. Finally, O—H...O and N—H...O hydrogen bonds reinforce the two‐dimensional structures of the two compounds.     

Asymmetric structure of cis‐[N‐(9‐anthracenylmethyl)‐1,2‐ethanediamine]dipyridineplatinum(II) dinitrate

Platinum antitumour agents, containing aromatic rings, which are used for targeting DNA in effective therapies for the treatment of cancer. We have synthesized the title metallocomplex with an aromatic ligand and determined its crystal structure. In many cases, complexes of platinum and other metals have a symmetrical structure. In contrast, the platinum(II) complex with pyridine and N‐(9‐anthracenylmethyl)‐1,2‐ethanediamine as ligands (systematic name: cis‐{N‐[(anthracen‐9‐yl)methyl]ethane‐1,2‐diamine‐κ²N ,N ′}bis(pyridine‐κN )platinum(II) dinitrate), [Pt(C₅H₅N)₂(C₁₇H₁₈N₂)](NO₃)₂, is asymmetric. Of the two pyridine ligands, only one is π‐stacked with anthracene, resulting in an asymmetric structure. Moreover, the angle of orientation of each pyridine ligand is variable. Further examination of the packing motif confirms an intermolecular edge‐to‐face interaction.