Optimization of a single-drop microextraction procedure for the determination of organophosphorus pesticides in water and fruit juice with gas chromatography-flame photometric detection

A single-drop microextraction (SDME) procedure was developed for the analysis of organophosphorus pesticides (OPPs) in water and fruit juice by gas chromatography (GC) with flame photometric detection (GC-FPD). The significant parameters affecting the SDME performance such as selection of microextraction solvent, solvent volume, extraction time, stirring rate, sample pH and temperature, and ionic strength were studied and optimized. Two types of SDME mode, static and cycle-flow SDME, were evaluated. The static SDME procedure provided more sensitive analysis of the target analytes. Therefore, static SDME with tributyl phosphate (TBP) as internal standard was selected for the real sample analysis. The limits of detection (LODs) in water for the six studied compounds were between 0.21 and 0.56 ng/mL with the relative standard deviations ranging from 1.7 to 10.0%. Linear response data was obtained in the concentration range of 0.5-50 ng/mL (except for dichlorvos 1.0-50 ng/mL) with correlation coefficients from 0.9995 to 0.9999. Environmental water sample collected from East Lake and fruit juice samples were successfully analyzed using the proposed method, but none of the analytes in both lake water and fruit juice were detected. The recoveries for the spiked water and juice samples were from 77.7 to 113.6%. Compared with the conventional methods, the proposed method enabled a rapid and simple determination of organophosphorus pesticides in water and fruit juice with minimal solvent consumption and a higher concentration capability.     

Development and applications of single-drop microextraction for pesticide residue analysis: A review

Single-drop microextraction (SDME) has become more popular than other microextraction techniques because it is simple, cost-effective, easy to operate and nearly solvent-free. The technique has been employed successfully for trace analysis in environmental, biomedical and food applications. In view of the increasingly stringent regulatory limits for many pesticides, which are below the LOD of the existing instruments, SDME may provide a cost-effective solution for reducing the LOD of pesticides. The present review focuses on recent development in SDME technique, and its application coupled with various analytical techniques, such as GC-MS, GC and HPLC for pesticide residue analysis in different matrices. The advantages, limitations and outlook on the future of SDME technique for its wider applications are also discussed.     

Single-drop microextraction as a powerful pretreatment tool for capillary electrophoresis: A review

Single drop microextraction (SDME) is a convenient and powerful preconcentration and sample cleanup method for capillary electrophoresis (CE). In SDME, analytes are typically extracted from a sample donor solution into an acceptor drop hanging at the inlet tip of a capillary. The enriched drop is then introduced to the capillary for CE analysis. Since the volume of the acceptor drop can be as small as a few nanoliters, the consumption of solvents can be minimized and the preconcentration effect is enhanced. In addition, by covering the acceptor phase with an organic layer or by using an organic acceptor phase, inorganic ions such as salts in the sample solution can be blocked from entering the acceptor phase, providing desalting effects. Here, we describe the basic principles and instrumentation for SDME and its coupling with CE. We also review recent developments and applications of SDME-CE.     

Cloud point extraction as a sample enrichment technique for capillary electrophoresis–An overview

Abstract

Cloud point extraction (CPE) is a simple, inexpensive and green sample enrichment technique for different analytes in different matrices. In this technique surfactant solution is used at concentration above critical micelle concentration to extract the analytes from various matrices. Capillary electrophoresis (CE) and family of related techniques have emerged as powerful analytical techniques for pharmaceutical, biomedical, food and environmental analysis. In this review we have described the applications of CPE coupling with CE.     

Developments in single-drop microextraction

Single-drop microextraction (SDME) has become a very popular liquid-phase microextraction technique because it is inexpensive, easy to operate and nearly solvent-free. Essentially, SDME combines extraction (and conceivably, cleanup) and concentration in a minimum number of steps, and thereafter, direct extract introduction into an analytical system. In this review, in order to encourage further development of SDME, we focus on its recent developments in its various guises. Its applications when used in combination with different analytical techniques, such as gas chromatography, high-performance liquid chromatography, inductively-coupled plasma mass spectrometry, capillary electrophoresis, mass spectrometry and electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry, are summarized. SDME does have some limitations, and these are also discussed as well. Finally, an outlook on the future of the technique is given.     

Solid-phase microextraction versus single-drop microextraction for the analysis of nitroaromatic explosives in water samples.

This paper compares solid-phase microextraction (SPME) with a recently developed extraction method called single-drop microextraction (SDME) for the analysis of nitroaromatic explosives in water samples. The two techniques are examined in terms of procedure, chromatographic analysis and method performance. All practical considerations for both techniques are also reviewed. SPME requires dedicated apparatus and is relatively expensive, as the fiber's lifetime is limited. However, it has the advantages over SDME that it can be easily used for headspace analysis and has lower detection limits for all the target analytes. SDME requires more elaborate manual operations, thus affecting linearity and precision.     

Determination of phenols in water samples by single-drop microextraction followed by in-syringe derivatization and gas chromatography-mass spectrometric detection

Trace analysis of phenolic compounds in water was performed by coupling single-drop microextraction (SDME) with in-syringe derivatization of the analytes and GC-MS analysis. The analytes were extracted from a 3ml sample solution using 2.5microl of hexyl acetate. After extraction, derivatization was carried out in syringe barrel using 0.5microl of N,O-bis(trimethylsilyl)acetamide. The influence of derivatizing reagent volume, derivatization time and temperature on the yield of the in-syringe silylation was investigated. Derivatization reaction is completed in 5min at 50 degrees C. Experimental SDME parameters, such as selection of organic solvent, sample pH, addition of salt, extraction time and temperature of extraction were studied. Analytical parameters, such as enrichment factor, precision, linearity and detection limits were also determined. The limits of detection were in the range of 4-61ng/l (S/N=3). The relative standard deviations obtained were between 4.8 and 12% (n=5).     

Multiple headspace single-drop micro-extraction for quantitative determination of lactide in thermally-oxidized polylactide

Single-drop micro-extraction (SDME), an emerging micro-extraction technique, was combined with multiple headspace (MHS) extraction to allow quantitative determination of lactide in thermally-oxidized polylactide. Different solvents, drop sizes and extraction times were tested to obtain best extraction efficiency and the method was further developed to obtain a linear regression plot for the multiple extractions. The combination of SDME and MHS extraction offered several advantages over traditional liquid-solid and headspace extraction techniques. No concentration step was needed and loss of volatiles was prevented as the ageing and extraction were performed in a closed system. Matrix effects, that disturb the quantitation of analytes in solid samples, were removed by the multiple headspace extraction.     

Double sample preconcentration by in‐line coupled large volume single drop microextraction and sweeping in capillary electrophoresis

Single drop microextraction (SDME) is a convenient and powerful preconcentration method for CE before injection. By simple combination of sample‐handling sequences without modification of the CE apparatus, a drop of an aqueous acceptor phase covered with a thin organic layer was formed at the tip of a capillary; 10 min SDME of fluorescein and 6‐carboxyfluorescein from a donor phase of pH 1 to an acceptor phase of pH 9 provided 110‐fold enrichments without stirring the donor phase. To improve the concentration effect further, SDME was coupled with an on‐line (after injection) sample preconcentration method, sweeping, in which analytes in a long sample zone are accumulated at the boundary of a pseudostationary phase penetrating into the sample zone. It is thus necessary to inject a sample of much larger volume than that of a drop in typical SDME. A Teflon sleeve over the capillary inlet allowed a large volume drop to be held stably during extraction. By in‐line coupling 10 min SDME and sweeping of a 30 nL sample using a cationic surfactant dodecyltrimethylammonium, enrichment factors of the double preconcentration were increased up to 32 000.     

Simple and commercial readily-available approach for the direct use of ionic liquid-based single-drop microextraction prior to gas chromatography: Determination of chlorobenzenes in real water samples as model analytical application

A simple and commercial readily-available approach that enables the direct use of ionic liquid (IL)-based single-drop microextraction (SDME) prior to gas chromatography (GC) is presented. The approach is based on thermal desorption (TD) of the analytes from the IL droplet to the GC system, by using a robust and commercially-available thermodesorption system. For this purpose, a two-glass-tube concentrically disposed system was designed. The inner tube is a laboratory-cut Pyrex tube (20 mm length) that houses the ionic liquid droplet from the SDME process, and the outer tube is a commercially-available TD glass tube (187 mm length) commonly employed for stir-bar sorptive extractions (SBSE). In this way, the proposed device prevents IL from entering the GC system, as this could dirty the inlet or even block the column. The determination of 10 chlorobenzenes in water samples by GC coupled with mass spectrometric (MS) detection has been chosen as model analytical application, showing the feasibility of the proposed approach. The SDME process consists of a 5 μL droplet of 1-hexyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate ([C₆MIM][PF₆]) suspended in the headspace (HS) of a 10 mL stirred sample. After extracting for 37 min at room temperature, the IL droplet is directly placed into the small inner tube, which is placed into the TD tube. The whole device is placed inside the TD unit, where desorption of the analytes is performed at 240 °C for 5 min with a helium flow rate of 100 mL min⁻¹. The analytical figures of merit of the proposed IL-(HS)-SDME-TD-GC–MS approach are very suitable for the determination of chlorobenzenes at ultratrace levels, with relative standard deviation values ranging between 2% and 17%, and limits of detection ranging between 1 and 4 ng L⁻¹, showing the potential offered by the IL-based SDME process with GC.     

Multisyringe Flow Injection Potentialities for Hyphenation with Different Types of Separation Techniques

The advantages of combining flow techniques with separation techniques are noteworthy. Flow-based methods are excellent tools for automating analytical procedures owing to their speed of analysis, reagent and sample saving ability, versatility, and inexpensive equipment. However, flow-based methods alone do not allow the separation of several analytes in a mixture. On the other hand, separation techniques (viz., chromatographic separations, capillary electrophoresis), widely used in analytical research due to high selectivity, require more expensive instrumentation. Thus, the combination of both techniques achieved the required selectivity with a more versatile, automated and, in some cases, low-cost methodology.

Multisyringe flow injection evidences interesting features with the utilization of the aforementioned combination of methods. Its potential for hyphenation with different separation techniques have been recently explored and are depicted in the present paper.     

Recent developments in sample preparation techniques for chromatography analysis of traditional Chinese medicines

Traditional Chinese medicines (TCMs) have a long history dating back thousands of years. Recently, there has been increasing interest worldwide in the use of TCMs for the prevention and treatment of various illnesses. In China, a large number of analytical tools, especially chromatographic techniques have been used to analyze the constituents of TCMs in order to control their quality and discover new bioactive compounds. In this paper, recent developments in sample preparation techniques for the extraction, clean-up, and concentration of analytes from TCMs are compared. These techniques include headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME), headspace liquid-phase microextraction (HS-LPME), microwave-assisted extraction (MAE), supercritical-fluid extraction (SFE), pressurized-liquid extraction (PLE), and microwave distillation (MD).     

Application of new approaches to liquid-phase microextraction for the determination of emerging pollutants

Liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) has been widely used as a pre-treatment technique for separation and preconcentration of organic analytes from aqueous samples. Nevertheless, this technique has several drawbacks, mainly in the use of large volumes of solvents, making LLE an expensive, environmentally-unfriendly technique.Miniaturized methodologies [e.g., liquid-phase microextraction (LPME)] have arisen in the search for alternatives to conventional LLE, using negligible volumes of extracting solvents and reducing the number of steps in the procedure. Developments have led to different approaches to LPME, namely single-drop microextraction (SDME), hollow-fiber LPME (HF-LPME), dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) and solidified floating organic drop microextraction (SFODME).This overview focuses on the application of these microextraction techniques to the analysis of emerging pollutants.     

In-line coupling of two-phase single drop microextraction and large volume stacking using an electroosmotic flow pump in nonaqueous capillary electrophoresis

In order to improve the concentration sensitivity of capillary electrophoresis (CE), two sample preconcentration techniques, single drop microextraction (SDME) and large volume stacking using an electroosmotic flow pump (LVSEP), were coupled in-line in a commercial CE instrument. By simple programming of liquid handling sequences, a pentanol drop was prepared at the tip of a fused silica capillary over which a Teflon tube had been sleeved to serve as a hydrophobic support. After extraction of the analytes from an aqueous donor solution into the drop, the entire capillary column was filled with enriched pentanol extract. LVSEP, in which the sample matrix is automatically removed by the EOF, was then carried out using a methanolic run buffer. The overall enrichment factors for the analytes pentachlorophenol (PCP), 3-bromobenzoic acid (3-BBA), and 4-iodobenzoic acid (4-IBA), from a combination of 30 min SDME and LVSEP on a 27 cm capillary, were about 7000, even without agitation of the donor solution. The resulting limits of detection for PCP, 3-BBA, and 4-IBA were 0.7, 0.3 and 0.7 nM, respectively. Since no modification of the existing CE instrument is necessary and a bare capillary is used for LVSEP, this scheme can be adapted quite easily for many CE applications that require high concentration sensitivity.     

Determination of carbamates and organophosphorus pesticides by SDME–GC in natural water

Water contamination due to the wide variety of pesticides used in agriculture practices is a global environmental pollution problem. Analytical methods with low quantification limits are necessary. The application of a new extraction technique, solvent drop microextraction (SDME), followed by gas chromatography with a nitrogen-phosphorus detector, was assessed for determining carbamates and organophosphorus pesticides in natural water. Experimental parameters which control the performance of SDME such as selection of microextraction solvent, optimization of organic drop volume, effects of sample stirring, salt addition, and, finally, sorption time profiles were studied. Once SDME was optimized, analytical parameters such as linearity (r ²>0.99), precision (<13%), and detection limits (0.2 to 5 μg/L), plus matrix effects were evaluated (no matrix effects were found). SDME is a dynamic technique able to extract pesticides from water in 14 min; the use of organic solvents and water samples for SDME is negligible compared to other extraction techniques.     

Determination of the chloroacetanilide herbicides in waters using single-drop microextraction and gas chromatography

In this article, a new method using single-drop microextraction (SDME) and gas chromatography micro-electron capture detection (GC-μECD) for the determination of chloroacetanilide herbicides (alachlor, acetochlor, metolachlor, pretilachlor and butachlor) residues was developed. The effects of SDME parameters such as extraction solvent, stirring rate, ionic strength, microdrop volume and extraction time were optimized. The optimum experimental conditions found were: 1.6 μl toluene microdrop, 5 ml water sample, 400 rpm stirring rate, 15 min extraction time and no salt addition. Analytical parameters such as linearity, repeatability and limit of detection were also evaluated. The proposed method was proved to be a simple and rapid analytical procedure for chloroacetanilide herbicides in water with limits of detection 0.0002–0.114 μg/l. The relative recoveries range from 80% to 102% for all the target analytes, with the relative standard deviations varying from 3.9% to 11.7%.     

Role of molecularly imprinted polymers for selective determination of environmental pollutants--a review

The molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) are synthetic polymers possessing specific cavities designed for a target molecule. By a mechanism of molecular recognition, the MIPs are used as selective tools for the development of various analytical techniques such as liquid chromatography, capillary electrochromatography, solid-phase extraction (SPE), binding assays and biosensors. This review describes the application of MIPs to the determination of environmental pollutants in these different analytical approaches with a special emphasis on their potential as selective SPE sorbent for the selective extraction of target analytes from complex matrices.     

Miniaturized preconcentration methods based on liquid–liquid extraction and their application in inorganic ultratrace analysis and speciation: A review

Liquid–liquid extraction (LLE) is widely used as a pre-treatment technique for separation and preconcentration of both organic and inorganic analytes from aqueous samples. Nevertheless, it has several drawbacks, such as emulsion formation or the use of large volumes of solvents, which makes LLE expensive and labour intensive. Therefore, miniaturization of conventional liquid–liquid extraction is needed. The search for alternatives to the conventional LLE using negligible volumes of extractant and the minimum number of steps has driven the development of three new miniaturized methodologies, i.e. single-drop microextraction (SDME), hollow fibre liquid-phase microextraction (HF-LPME) and dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME). The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of these novel preconcentration approaches and their potential use in analytical labs involved in inorganic (ultra)trace analysis and speciation. Relevant applications to the determination of metal ions, metalloids, organometals and non-metals are included.     

Recent progress of online sample preconcentration techniques in microchip electrophoresis

Microchip electrophoresis (MCE) has been advanced remarkably by the applications of several separation modes and the integration with several chemical operations on a single planer substrate. MCE shows superior analytical performance, e.g., high-speed analysis, high resolution, low consumption of reagents, and so on, whereas low-concentration sensitivity is still one of the major problems. To overcome this drawback, various online sample preconcentration techniques have been developed in MCE over the past 15 years, which have successfully enhanced the detection sensitivity in MCE. This review highlights recent developments in online sample preconcentration in MCE categorized on the basis of "dynamic" and "static" methods. The dynamic techniques including field amplified stacking, ITP, sweeping, and focusing have been easily applied to MCE, which provide effective enrichments of various analytes. The static techniques such as SPE and filtration have also been combined with MCE. In the static techniques, extremely high preconcentration efficiency can be obtained, compared to the dynamic methods. This review provides comprehensive tables listing the applications and sensitivity enhancement factors of these preconcentration techniques employed in MCE.     

Fully automatic exposed and in‐syringe dynamic single‐drop microextraction with online agitation for the determination of polycyclic musks in surface waters of the Pearl River Estuary and South China Sea

An automatic exposed and in‐syringe dynamic single‐drop microextraction method (SDME) for the determination of five polycyclic musks in natural waters was developed using gas chromatography with mass spectrometry. Online agitation was first introduced to the automatic SDME with a magnetic mixer fixed to the bottom of the sample tray of the autosampler. A high enrichment factor (110 ～182) for the target analytes could be achieved after several parameters that affected the microextraction were optimized. The recoveries were between 84.9 and 119.5%, while the limit of detection ranged from 3.4 to 11 ng/L with relative standard deviation < 11.1% for the polycyclic musks. This new SDME mode is fully automatic with great convenience, high enrichment and good reproducibility, and no human intervention. The proposed method was, therefore, successfully applied to determine the polycyclic musks in 31 surface sea waters that were collected from the Pearl River Estuary and the South China Sea. Most polycyclic musks could be detected with the total concentrations ranging from 58.9 to 528.5 ng/L. By using spatial interpolation method of ordinary kriging, the most contaminated area was found near the cities of Dongguan and Guangzhou with local discharge via the major rivers.