分散式固相萃取净化-气相色谱-质谱联用测定土壤中的邻苯二甲酸酯

建立了土壤中18种邻苯二甲酸酯类内分泌干扰物的微波提取-分散式固相萃取净化-GC/MS分析方法.10 g土壤样品经20 mL二氯甲烷和丙酮混合溶剂微波提取后,以丙酮为置换溶剂并浓缩至1.5 mL.浓缩液中加入0.2 g C18吸附剂,振摇3 min后离心10 min(8000 r/min),取1.0 mL上层清液经正己烷置换后用气相色谱-质谱联用分析,并通过基质标准加入校准曲线补偿邻苯二甲酸酯的基体效应.净化所需时间少于20 min.净化后土壤萃取液的基质去除率达到72.7%.方法线性范围7.5～750 μg/kg,相关系数大于0.998; 6次土壤样品测定值的RSD在5.5%～12.1%之间; 加标土壤样品测定值RSD在7.3%～19.4%之间; 平均回收率在94.4%～114.6%之间; 检出限为1.2～4.3 μg/kg.     

Determination of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons in aerosol by solid-phase extraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrum

The optimum procedures for clean up aerosols in silica solid-phase extraction (SPE) cartridge prior to the analysis of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) by gas chromatography–mass spectrum (GC–MS) in selected ion monitoring detection mode have been investigated. The silica SPE cartridge is activated by dichloromethane and hexane, and then dried up by vacuum in SPE instrument for about 5 min. The sample volume loaded on the cartridge is 3 ml and after loading the sample the cartridge was dried in vacuum for 5 min. The PAHs were eluted from the cartridge by 3 ml 20% dichloromethane in hexane. The flow-rate of sample loading and eluting was controlled in about 1 ml min⁻¹. The aerosols collected on the campus of Beijing Normal University from August 2001 to July 2002 have been processed with these optimum procedures and 16 EPA priority pollution PAHs in the aerosols have been quantitatively determined.     

Naphthalene,a polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon,in the fish samples from the Bangsai river of Bangladesh by gas chromatograph–mass spectrometry

Naphthalene, a polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH), was detected and quantified in the selected varieties of fishes collected from the Bangsai river, one of the contaminated rivers located at Savar near the Dhaka Export Processing Zone (DEPZ), Bangladesh, during the period October 2009. Naphthalene, a carcinogenic compound, was analyzed by GC–MS as it was in the mixture of dichloromethane–hexane (1:1) crude extract of the flesh of fish samples collected from the aforesaid river. A suitable and reliable procedure for the extraction of naphthalene from the fish sample has been developed. A multi-layer clean-up (silica gel) column was used, followed by glass fiber filter (GFF) paper to eliminate the interfering organic compounds as well as the lipids and fat. It was observed that PAHs deposition on the samples takes place in different morphological parts of the biological materials. The PAH, naphthalene, was found in almost all of the fish samples and the concentration of which was in the range 0.030–1.004 μg/g. Recovery studies with fortified samples indicated that the recovery efficiency for naphthalene was about 79.14%. This concentration is within the range of values reported for other comparable regions of the world.     

A cost effective,sensitive, and environmentally friendly sample preparation method for determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in solid samples

A simple, cost effective, and yet sensitive sample preparation technique was investigated for determining Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in solid samples. The method comprises ultrasonic extraction, Stir Bar Sorptive Extraction (SBSE), and thermal desorption–gas chromatography–mass spectrometry to increase analytical capacity in laboratories. This method required no clean-up, satisfied PAHs recovery, and significantly advances cost performance over conventional extraction methods, such as Soxhlet and Microwave Assisted Extraction (MAE). This study evaluated three operational parameters for ultrasonic extraction: solvent composition, extraction time, and sample load. A standard material, SRM 1649 a (urban dust), was used as the solid sample matrix, and 12 priority PAHs on the US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) list were analyzed. Combination of non-polar and polar solvents ameliorated extraction efficiency. Acetone/hexane mixtures of 2:3 and 1:1 (v/v) gave the most satisfactory results: recoveries ranged from 63.3% to 122%. Single composition solvents (methanol, hexane, and dichloromethane) showed fewer recoveries. Comparing 20 min with 60 min sonication, longer sonication diminished extraction efficiencies in general. Furthermore, sample load became a critical factor in certain solvent systems, particularly MeOH. MAE was also compared to the ultrasonic extraction, and results determined that the 20-min ultrasonic extraction using acetone/hexane (2:3, v/v) was as potent as MAE. The SBSE method using 20 mL of 30% alcohol-fortified solution rendered a limit of detection ranging from 1.7 to 32 ng L⁻¹ and a limit of quantitation ranging from 5.8 to 110 ng L⁻¹ for the 16 US EPA PAHs.     

Solid-Phase Extraction and LC with Fluorescence Detection for Analysis of PAHs in Rainwater

The efficiency of extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from rainwater by solid-phase extraction (SPE) with three different types of cartridge, and analysis by high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection, are discussed in this paper. Three cartridges were investigated but only one was suitable. After equilibration in a desiccator for 65–80 h or in ambient air for 90–100 h the SPE cartridges were activated with 5 mL dichloromethane then 5 mL 2-propanol. The volume of sample passed through the cartridges was 50 mL; after loading of the sample the cartridges were dried under vacuum for approximately 20 min by application of a pressure of 15 mbar to the SPE manifold. The PAHs were eluted with 5 mL dichloromethane–hexane, 50:50 (v/v). The flow rate used for conditioning, sample loading, and elution was 2.5 mL min⁻¹, achieved by application of a pressure of 6 mbar. For analysis of PAHs in rainwater, recovery was between 67 and 99%, the relative standard deviation varied between 2 and 5%, and the detection limits of the method were less than 16.9 ng L⁻¹ for several PAHs. These optimum conditions were used for analysis of rainwater collected between June 2002 and May 2003 at two sites in Alsace (eastern France) and 17 PAHs were quantitatively determined. Concentrations varied between 1.6 and 968.1 ng L⁻¹.     

In-house validation of an improved sample extraction and clean-up method for GC determination of isomers of nervonic acid in meat products

An improved extraction and clean-up method for determination of brain-specific fatty acids, in particular lignoceric acid (C24:0) and the cis/ trans isomers of nervonic acid (15 c-t C24:1), in meat products has been developed. The method is based on isolation of the polar lipids of interest from the bulk lipids by solid-phase extraction. The fatty acids, derivatised to their fatty acid methyl esters, are quantified by GC in a DB5 column. Fresh meat samples were extracted by using a mixture of n-butanol:hexane (1:9) as solvent. The extract was loaded in a silica gel cartridge column previously equilibrated with hexane. The first fraction containing the major part of the fat was eluted with hexane while acetone and methanol allowed the elution of fatty acids bound to polar moieties such as nervonic and lignoceric acids. This second fraction containing the analyte was methylated and injected into the GC for quantification after addition octacosane (C(28)) as internal standard.     

Improved Method for the Determination of Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-dioxins and Dibenzofurans (PCDD/Fs) in Sanitary Napkins

Abstract

An improved method was developed for determining highly toxic 2,3,7,8-substituted polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzo-p-furans (PCDD/Fs) in sanitary napkins. Samples were extracted by Soxhlet (50% dichloromethane/hexane) and sonication (hexane), and a multi-layer silica column was used for clean-up after acetone precipitation to separate the superabsorbent polymers. Improved separation efficiency of PCDD/Fs from sanitary napkins with a high level of superabsorbent polymers was achieved using the acetone precipitation method. Hexane was then applied as an alternative solvent to remove residual interfering substances including sticky components contained on sanitary napkins via alumina column chromatography in the second clean-up step. Recoveries approached 100% with an average relative standard deviation of less than 15%, and recoveries of internal standards were from 70.5 to 114.8% and 0.6 to 13.6% for the two extraction methods. The mean method detection limit was 0.075–0.968?pg/g for Soxhlet extraction and 0.0032–0.091?pg/g for sonication extraction. The established method meets the quality criteria for the screening of dioxins stated in EU Regulations 589/2014 and 709/2014, and therefore provides a suitable alternative for the determination of dioxins in sanitary napkins containing superabsorbent polymers.     

Determination of Chlorophenols in Wastewater with Methyl Chloroformate Derivatization,Solid Phase Extraction,and Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry

The determination of chlorophenols in wastewater with methyl chloroformate derivatization, solid phase extraction, and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry is reported. In order to employ this combined solid phase derivative extraction method, quantitative extraction was performed by the introduction of 100 mL of sample in 1.0 mol L^?1 sodium hydroxide into a column containing 500 mg of packed resin at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. The chlorophenols were retained and derivatized quantitatively in the column by the introduction of 0.25 mL of methyl chloroformate. The derivatized analytes were eluted with 5.0 mL of hexane before the effluent was dried under a stream of nitrogen. The dried solution was diluted to a volume of 50 µL with hexane followed by analysis by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. The preconcentration parameters were optimized and under these conditions: limits of detection from 0.010 to 0.423 µg L^?1, a preconcentration factor of 2500, and precision values from 4.8 to 7.7% as the relative standard deviation were obtained. The method was employed for the analysis of water samples and the recoveries of the analytes were between 76 and 103%.     

Optimization of matrix solid-phase dispersion conditions for UV filters determination in biota samples

A low solvent consumption method for the determination of eight ultraviolet (UV) filters, displaying low to medium polarities, in freeze-dried samples of marine bivalves and fish is proposed. Matrix solid-phase dispersion (MSPD) and gas chromatography with mass spectrometry (GC-MS) were used as sample preparation and determination techniques, respectively. This work describes the influence of several parameters (type and amount of dispersant and clean-up sorbents, as well as elution solvent) on the yield and the selectivity of the MSPD extraction. Under optimized conditions, samples (0.5?g) were ground with 2?g of Florisil in a mortar with a pestle and transferred into a polypropylene syringe, which contained 1?g of C18 as clean-up sorbent. Analytes were eluted with 5?mL of acetonitrile. This extract was concentrated to dryness, re-constituted with 1?mL of ethyl acetate and injected in the GC-MS system without any further clean-up. The global average recoveries, measured for three different biota samples, spiked at three different levels (between 50 and 1000?ng?g^?1), ranged from 80% to 101% with associated standard deviations below 10%. The inter-day precision of the method varied from 4% to 15% and the achieved LOQs (defined for a signal to noise ratio of 10) ranged from 4 to 28?ng?g^?1, referred to the freeze-dried matrix. Octocrylene (OCR) was found in some samples of fish and mussels at concentrations between 15 and 20?ng?g^?1, referred to dry mass.     

Dispersive solid-phase extraction clean up combined with Soxhlet extraction for the determination of 16 PAHs in soil samples by GC-MS

Dichloromethane soil samples extracts were prepared using Soxhlet extraction technique, and after clean-up step, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of 16 priority polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) was carried out. A comparison of dispersive solid-phase extraction (dSPE) and column chromatography (cC), as clean-up techniques, was evaluated. Six different sorbents (silica, diatomaceous earth, primary–secondary amine, C18, clinoptilolite and florisil) were tested as dispersive clean-up sorbents versus activated silica and alumina for cC. Best results for three concentration levels among dSPE were obtained using diatomaceous earth, with recovery values in the range of 75–112% for 13 of 16 analysed compounds, while cC recoveries were in the range of 75–111% for all analysed PAHs. Analysis of 12 soil samples from urban area of Ni? (Serbia) singled out acenaphthene as the most abundant compound.     

Analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in pine needles by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry: comparison of different extraction and clean-up procedures

Three extraction methodologies (Soxhlet, ultrasonic and pressurized liquid extraction) and several clean-up procedures (Florisil, silica and alumina in cartridges or glass column format) were tested and compared to extract 16 US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from Pinus pinea L. needles. Quantification was done by gas chromatography with mass spectrometry, by internal standard method using five deuterated PAH surrogate standards. Among the several extraction and clean-up procedures tested, ultrasonic extraction followed by alumina cartridge clean-up was the preferred method, yielding recoveries between 72 and 100% and limits of detection between 0.22 and 0.71 ng/g dry weight. The performance of the method was tested to determine PAHs in naturally contaminated samples.     

Extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from smoked fish using pressurized liquid extraction with integrated fat removal

Quantification of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in smoked fish products often requires multiple clean-up steps to remove fat and other compounds that may interfere with the chemical analysis. We present a novel pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) method that integrates exhaustive extraction with fat retention in one single analytical step. The PLE parameters: type of fat retainer, flush volume, solvent composition, fat-to-fat retainer ratio (FFR), and the dimensions of the extraction cells were the most important factors for obtaining fat-free extracts with high recoveries of PAHs. A 100 mL extraction cell filled with 18 g activated silica gel, dichloromethane:hexane (15:85, v/v) as extraction solvent, FFR of 0.025 and 100% flush volume was the best analytical setup for integrated extraction and fat retention.The one-step procedure provided a more rapid and cost-efficient alternative with minimization of waste generation compared to the standard reference method that is based on a multi-step procedure. Furthermore, the analytical quality of the two methods are comparable, while the new integrated approach for extraction and cleanup is less prone to analytical errors (random and systematic) because of fewer analytical steps.     

Matrix solid-phase dispersion on column clean-up/pre-concentration as a novel approach for fast isolation of abuse drugs from human hair

A simple and fast sample pre-treatment method based on matrix solid-phase dispersion (MSPD) for isolating cocaine, benzoylecgonine (BZE), codeine, morphine and 6-monoacethylmorphine (6-MAM) from human hair has been developed. The MSPD approach consisted of using alumina (1.80 g) as a dispersing agent and 0.6 M hydrochloric acid (4 mL) as an extracting solvent. For a fixed hair sample mass of 0.050 g, the alumina mass to sample mass ratio obtained was 36. A previously conditioned Oasis HLB cartridge (2 mL methanol, plus 2 mL ultrapure water, plus 1 mL of 0.2 M/0.2 M sodium hydroxide/boric acid buffer solution at pH 9.2) was attached to the end of the MSPD syringe for on column clean-up of the hydrochloric acid extract and for transferring the target compounds to a suitable solvent for gas chromatography (GC) analysis. Therefore, the adsorbed analytes were directly eluted from the Oasis HLB cartridges with 2 mL of 2% acetic acid in methanol before concentration by N₂ stream evaporation and dry extract derivatization with N-methyl-tert-butylsilyltrifluoroacetamide (BSTFA) and chlorotrimethylsilane (TMCS). The optimization/evaluation of all the factors affecting the MSPD and on column clean-up procedures has led to a fast sample treatment, and analytes extraction and pre-concentration can be finished in approximately 30 min. The developed method has been applied to eight hair samples from poli-drug abusers and measured analyte concentrations have been found to be statistically similar (95% confidence interval) to those obtained after a conventional enzymatic hydrolysis method (Pronase E).     

Evaluation and optimization of extraction and clean-up methods for the analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in peat samples

The analysis of PAH in peat samples is complicated by the high content of organic matter in peat which affects both extraction efficiency and analytical quality. Therefore, we evaluated the efficiencies of three extraction methods (accelerated solvent extraction (ASE), fluidized bed extraction, ultrasonic extraction) and several clean-up techniques in order to find the best set of methods. ASE proved to be the best extraction method. For clean-up, a procedure using aluminium oxide and silica gel showed the highest efficiency, whereas a method originally developed for soil samples failed to remove the peat matrix satisfactorily. With the optimized extraction and clean-up procedure, 170 samples from Canadian bogs were analysed for PAH. With overall recovery rates between 69?±?14 and 89?±?16% and an inaccuracy of ≤20%, the optimized method was a well suitable tool for the analysis of PAH in peat samples.     

Polyurethane foam chips combined with liquid chromatography in the determination of unmetabolized polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons excreted in human urine

A method suitable for the determination of unmetabolized polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) excreted at trace levels (ng/L) in human urine for the monitoring of exposure of the general population to PAH contamination was developed. PAHs were determined, after enrichment by solid-phase extraction on polyurethane foam (PUF) chips, by HPLC with fluorescence detection. Different parameters affecting analyte extraction to the PUF, including urine salting-out and organic additives, and optimization of conditions for clean-up and desorption have been investigated. Optimized conditions were 40 mL acidified urine sample, added with magnesium sulfate, tetrahydrofuran and a 2 cm3 PUF chip, and extracted by shaking at 30 rpm for 1 h at ambient temperature. Desorption was performed, after a clean-up step with diluted sodium hydroxide, using a small amount of diethyl ether. The recovery of PAH congeners from spiked urines was >90% in the 2-100 ng/L range; the detection limit was 0.1-0.5 ng/L, depending on the considered PAH congener; day-to-day precision, at 50 ng/L native PAH content, was CV = 10-20%. The proposed technique provides a simple, economical and effective procedure for the determination of trace amounts of unmetabolized PAHs excreted in human urine spot samples.     

Comparative performance of extraction strategies for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in peats

The assessment of historical trends in atmospheric deposition of organic contaminants by using peat samples has been reported on several occasions because these samples represent an almost ideal medium for recording temporal changes in organic contaminant deposition rates. The determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in peat samples is complicated due to the high content of organic matter in peat, which affects both extraction efficiency and analytical quality. A rapid and simple method is proposed for the determination of 10 US Environmental Protection Agency indicator PAHs in complex matrices such as peat. This article reviews and addresses the most relevant analytical methods for determining PAHs in peat. We discuss and critically evaluate three different extraction procedures, such as ultrasound-assisted solvent extraction (UASE), shaking and pressurized liquid extraction (PLE). Clean-up of extracts was performed by solid-phase extraction using silica cartridges. Detection of the selected PAHs was carried out by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with fluorescence detection for determination. Optimization of the variables affecting extraction by the selected extraction techniques was conducted, concluding that the UASE extraction method using hexane:dichloromethane (80:20) as extractant was robust enough to determine the selected PAHs in peat samples with estimated quantification limits between 0.050 and 3.5 μg/kg depending on the PAH. UASE did not demand sophisticated equipment and long extraction times. PLE involved sophisticated equipment and showed important variations in the results. The method proposed was applied to the determination of PAHs in peat samples from Xistral Mountains (Galicia, Spain).     

加速溶剂萃取-气相色谱-质谱法测定固体废物中酚类化合物

提出了气相色谱-质谱法测定固体废物中12种酚类化合物残留量的方法。样品以丙酮-二氯甲烷(2+3)混合液为萃取剂,经加速溶剂萃取仪提取后,在K-D浓缩装置上浓缩至1 mL,经硅胶柱净化后,用丙酮-二氯甲烷(1+9)混合液淋洗后再经K-D浓缩至1 mL,通过HP-5 MS石英毛细管色谱柱(30 m×0.25 mm,0.25μm)分离,采用电子轰击离子源选择离子监测模式进行质谱测定。12种酚类化合物的检出限(3S/N)在9.60～18.5μg.kg-1之间。以空白土壤样品为基体进行回收试验,测得回收率在74.7%～108.4%之间,测定值的相对标准偏差(n=7)均小于7.5%。     

Determination of Chlorophenols and Alkylphenols in Water and Juice by Solid Phase Derivative Extraction and Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry

A solid phase derivative extraction method using acetic anhydride was developed for the determination of chlorophenols and alkylphenols in water and fruit juice by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS). The quantitative extraction was performed by passing 100 mL of sample prepared in 0.1 mol L^?1 sodium hydroxide through a column packed with 500 mg of a strong anion-exchange resin at a flow rate of 0.75 mL min^?1. The retained phenols were quantitatively derivatized in the column by the introduction of 0.25 mL of acetic anhydride. The derivatized phenols were eluted with 3.0 mL of hexane and the effluent was dried under nitrogen. The final volume was diluted to fifty microliters with hexane and analyzed by GC–MS. Under the optimum conditions, preconcentration factors of 2000, limits of detection between 0.005 and 1.796 µg L^?1, and relative standard deviations of 2.1% to 6.7% were obtained. The method was successfully applied to wastewater and fruit juice and the recoveries of phenols were between 76% and 111%.     

Determination of 21 organochlorine pesticides in tree leaves using solid-phase extraction clean-up cartridges

A method to determine 21 organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) in tree leaves [chestnut (Castanea sativa), hazel (Corylus avellana), oak (Quercus robur) and walnut tree (Juglans regia)] based on microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) followed by solid-phase extraction (SPE) clean-up is described. After extraction with hexane:acetone (50:50), four different sorbents (Florisil, tandem Florisil + alumina, silica and ENVI-Carb) were assayed for the clean-up step. Pesticides were eluted with 5 mL of hexane:ethyl acetate (80:20) and determined by gas chromatography and electron capture detection (GC-ECD). Carbon was the sorbent, which provided colourless eluates and chromatograms with less interferent compounds. Analytical recoveries obtained were ca. 100% for all the studied pesticides with this sorbent.     

Facile preparation of nano-g-C3N4/UiO-66-NH2 composite as sorbent for high-efficient extraction and preconcentration of food colorants prior to HPLC analysis

In this work,the nano-g-C₃N₄/Ui O-66-NH₂composite was prepared by one-step solvothermal method.The as-prepared composite was characterized by scanning electron microscopy,Brunner-Emmet-Teller measurement,energy dispersive spectrometer,X-ray diffraction,and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy.By using nano-g-C₃N₄/Ui O-66-NH₂composite as sorbent,a dispersive solid-phase extraction coupled with high-performance liquid chromatogra...