Equipment qualification and its application to conductivity measuring systems

It is only possible to obtain analytical results that are suitable for their intended purpose if the equipment used is capable of producing measurements of the required quality. To ensure that this requirement is met, analysts should define the performance criteria required from the instruments, ensure that only suitable instruments are selected for analytical measurements, and confirm that these instruments continue to meet these criteria for their entire operational life. This process should be conducted on a formal, documented basis, known as equipment qualification. In addition to describing the key elements of equipment qualification for all analytical instruments, this paper gives specific guidance on its application to conductivity systems that has never previously appeared in the literature. The benefits of performing equipment qualification are highlighted and guidance is given on the selection of control standards and why the equipment vendor performing stages of equipment qualification can be of benefit to the user. The relationship between equipment qualification and method validation is discussed, including how these activities play a major role in determining the quality control measures that should be applied to routine analysis.     

气相色谱仪验证要点

介绍分析仪器验证的基本概念和主要内容。总结了气相色谱仪验证中设计确认、安装确认、运行确认和性能确认的验证过程和要点,详细介绍了验证内容、具体项目、参考指标、参与人员、时间频次和要点等内容,指出了气相色谱仪验证需要注意的问题,提出了气相色谱仪验证工作的改进建议,为气相色谱仪器验证提供技术参考。     

The development and application of guidance on equipment qualification of analytical instruments

 This paper describes the development of guidance for the equipment qualification (EQ) of analytical instruments. EQ is a formal process that provides documented evidence that an instrument is fit for its intended purpose and kept in a state of maintenance and calibration consistent with its use.     

Qualification and validation of software and computer systems in laboratories

 Installation and operational qualification are important steps in the overall validation and qualification process for software and computer systems. This article guides users of such systems step by step through the installation and operational qualification procedures. It provides guidelines on what should be tested and documented during installation prior to routine use. The author also presents procedures for the qualification of software using chromatographic data systems and a network server for central archiving as examples. Received: 31 October 1997 · Accepted: 25 November 1997     

Assessment of parameters for simulation of thermal ageing of materials in nuclear power plants using DSC

Summary Simulation of thermal ageing is an important part of qualification of materials designed for the use in nuclear power plants (NPP). According to standards, the simulation of long-term service thermal ageing is performed isothermally at elevated temperature using Arrhenius methodology. The samples or equipment are aged in thermal chamber, to bring them to the same state as after long-term service time. To proceed a reliable simulation, the testing parameters should be taken very carefully and the accelerator factors should not be too high. The testing temperature and time and the activation energy are the most important parameters. Determination of these factors and the limitations of their use in practice are discussed.     

The use of uncertainty estimates of test results in comparisons with acceptance limits

When a test is performed in order to qualify a material or a product for a certain use, the result is generally compared with an acceptance limit. The test result has an uncertainty which should be estimated and stated (e.g. in accordance with GUM). Very often this is not the case. Further, discussions often arise on the issue of how the uncertainty shall be considered in relationship to the acceptance limit. The intention of this note is to describe, in simple terms, the statistical background and to give some recommendations. In short, there are two clean-cut, extreme situations. The first case is when the uncertainty of the testing procedure is the dominating factor. Here it is found that the estimates of single laboratories cannot, generally, be used for comparisons with acceptance limits. One should have standardised, well-verified estimates based on comprehensive investigations of the method. It can also be concluded that comparisons between test results and acceptance limits have to be made with regard to the actual circumstances, as, e.g. how the acceptance limit is related to the risk. In the second case, the variation in the property of the material or product dominates and the uncertainty of the testing procedure is negligible. When the results are non-quantitative (go – no go), statistical methods can be used to estimate the risk taken with a certain sampling and acceptance strategy that a certain proportion of the batch to be delivered does not qualify. This should be considered more often in standardisation of product test methods. When the results are quantitative, a statistical analysis should be performed and the uncertainty should be compared with the acceptance limit as before, from the actual circumstances. When effects of testing uncertainty and product variation are comparable a sound treatment requires extensive experimental work. No short cuts can be made without loss of confidence! Received: 17 August 2001 Accepted: 21 March 2002     

Validation of analytical methods involved in dissolution assays: Acceptance limits and decision methodologies

Dissolution tests are key elements to ensure continuing product quality and performance. The ultimate goal of these tests is to assure consistent product quality within a defined set of specification criteria. Validation of an analytical method aimed at assessing the dissolution profile of products or at verifying pharmacopoeias compliance should demonstrate that this analytical method is able to correctly declare two dissolution profiles as similar or drug products as compliant with respect to their specifications. It is essential to ensure that these analytical methods are fit for their purpose. Method validation is aimed at providing this guarantee. However, even in the ICHQ2 guideline there is no information explaining how to decide whether the method under validation is valid for its final purpose or not. Are the entire validation criterion needed to ensure that a Quality Control (QC) analytical method for dissolution test is valid? What acceptance limits should be set on these criteria? How to decide about method's validity? These are the questions that this work aims at answering. Focus is made to comply with the current implementation of the Quality by Design (QbD) principles in the pharmaceutical industry in order to allow to correctly defining the Analytical Target Profile (ATP) of analytical methods involved in dissolution tests. Analytical method validation is then the natural demonstration that the developed methods are fit for their intended purpose and is not any more the inconsiderate checklist validation approach still generally performed to complete the filing required to obtain product marketing authorization.     

Practical guidelines for reporting results in single- and multi-component analytical calibration: A tutorial

Practical guidelines for reporting analytical calibration results are provided. General topics, such as the number of reported significant figures and the optimization of analytical procedures, affect all calibration scenarios. In the specific case of single-component or univariate calibration, relevant issues discussed in the present Tutorial include: (1) how linearity can be assessed, (2) how to correctly estimate the limits of detection and quantitation, (2) when and how standard addition should be employed, (3) how to apply recovery studies for evaluating accuracy and precision, and (4) how average prediction errors can be compared for different analytical methodologies. For multi-component calibration procedures based on multivariate data, pertinent subjects here included are the choice of algorithms, the estimation of analytical figures of merit (detection capabilities, sensitivity, selectivity), the use of non-linear models, the consideration of the model regression coefficients for variable selection, and the application of certain mathematical pre-processing procedures such as smoothing.     

How instrument manufactures help with accreditation and ISO certification

 To help users of laboratory instrumentation to obtain laboratory accreditation and International Organization of Standardization certification, instrument manufactures should develop a comprehensive compliance programme for their products that includes product features, documentation and services for equipment validation and qualification. Received: 5 October 1998 · Accepted: 20 October 1998     

Correction procedures in electron probe microanalysis of bulk samples

In recent years many of the advances in quantitative microprobe analysis have come from the improved ability to model the complex physics in the computer. This has enabled the accuracy of normal bulk analysis to be improved-right down to the very light elements as far as boron-and has extended the technique to the analysis of multiple thin films and layered samples. It has also allowed the user to shortcut the use of standards, though at the cost of somewhat reduced accuracy. Thus the analyst has come to rely more and more on correction procedures of increasing complexity, yet at the same time must understand their limitations. It is likely that in future the computer itself will be able to accumulate the best practice of expert users, advising the newcomer how these procedures can be best applied and where they are most likely to be in error.     

Small camera as a handheld colorimetric tool in the analytical chemistry

Recently, there is an effort to introduce new types of analytical procedures and handheld assays to provide simple and reliable equipment for the field and household analyses. Development of diagnostic tools for self-diagnosis is another challenge in analytical chemistry. Digital cameras are widely available and cheap, hence they could be the sensor platform for construction of analytical and diagnostic methods. In general, good availability of cameras integrated into smartphones can be easily converted into an analytical tool. This review relates to the use of digital camera in analytical chemistry and there are introduced the facts how digital data can be processed and what the limits of digital photography are. Recent papers in this issue and discussion of development in camera based assays is also provided here.     

Quality assurance and instrumentation

 The quality process for commercial analytical equipment starts with the selection of the vendor. It is recommended that vendors be selected who are recognized as having quality processes in place for instrument design, development, manufacturing, testing, service, and support, for example, ISO 9001 registration. When the instrument arrives in the laboratory, the installation process should follow well-documented procedures. This includes a visual inspection that the instrument is not damaged and checking that the instrument, documentation and accessories such as cables and tubings are complete. Before the instrument is used it should be verified that it meets functional and performance specification. During operation the instruments should be periodically inspected and tested, verified to meet performance, and calibrated. The instrument should be labeled with the calibration status, indicating the dates of the last successful and the next performance verification and calibration. Defective instruments should be removed from the testing area or should at least be labeled as being "out of order." Received 23 August 1995 Accepted 6 September 1995     

Analytical instrument qualification in capillary electrophoresis

Capillary electrophoresis (CE) is a well-established and frequently used technique in the pharmaceutical industry. Therefore an appropriate analytical instrument qualification (AIQ) is required for quality assurance. AIQ forms the basis of a quality management followed by analytical method validation, system suitability tests (SSTs) and quality control checks. Two parts of the AIQ, namely the operational qualification (OQ) and the performance qualification (PQ) are of particular interest in the daily routine of the laboratory. A new concept for OQ and PQ was developed to assure the correct function of a CE system. The significance of each parameter, possible test methods as well as acceptance criteria will be presented and discussed in detail. Especially temperature adjustment by the cooling system and the voltage supply must be tested for accurate and precise operation. The detector noise, wavelength accuracy and detector linearity have to be checked as well. Finally, the injection linearity, accuracy and precision need to be qualified. The proposed set of qualification procedures is easy to implement and was already tested on five CE instruments from three different manufacturers. A time- and cost-saving continuous PQ was derived, using results from method-specific SSTs and some additional experiments. This holistic concept continuously surveys the most relevant parameters, hence assuring the suitability of the used instruments and decreasing their downtimes.     

The development and application of guidance on EQ of analytical instruments: High performance liquid chromatography

 This paper describes the development and application of guidance on EQ (EQ) of high performance liquid chromatography instruments. EQ is a formal process that provides documented evidence that an instrument is fit for its intended purpose and kept in a state of maintenance and calibration consistent with its use.     

Quality control in residual solvent analysis: the static headspace gas chromatographic method

 Residual solvent testing of raw materials and drug products constitutes part of a quality control programme. Static headspace gas chromatography (HS/GC) is suggested in current pharmacopoeias as a general tool for residual solvent testing. But the main obstacles to using HS/GC procedures are the absence of performance tests, suitable reference solvents and matrix standards, and reference methods. Harmonized regulations for residual solvent testing allow the use of a cumulative approach to estimate the residual solvent content in drug products. The supplier data may be appropriate. Therefore, in a quality control programme the main accent is put on the definition of specification limits (in accordance with toxicological data, and the influence of residual solvents on the physical properties and stability of the product) and supplier qualification. This paper focuses on two main problems linked to supplier qualification: system performance and matrix effect. HS/GC of a mixture containing solvents of different volatility and polarity is proposed as a performance test. The test can be done in three ways in accordance with the residual solvents characteristics, the test sample solubility and the specification levels required. The use of the test as a diagnostic tool is demonstrated and sources of uncertainty of the recovery determination are discussed. Received: 12 December 1998 · Accepted: 25 January 1999     

The reductionist paradox: are the laws of chemistry and physics sufficient for the discovery of new drugs?

Reductionism is alive and well in drug-discovery research. In that tradition, we continually improve experimental and computational methods for studying smaller and smaller aspects of biological systems. Although significant improvements continue to be made, are our efforts too narrowly focused? Suppose all error could be removed from these methods, would we then understand biological systems sufficiently well to design effective drugs? Currently, almost all drug research focuses on single targets. Should the process be expanded to include multiple targets? Recent efforts in this direction have lead to the emerging field of polypharmacology. This appears to be a move in the right direction, but how much polypharmacology is enough? As the complexity of the processes underlying polypharmacology increase will we be able to understand them and their inter-relationships? Is “new” mathematics unfamiliar in much of physics and chemistry research needed to accomplish this task? A number of these questions will be addressed in this paper, which focuses on issues and questions not answers to the drug-discovery conundrum.     

Validation and qualification: the fitness for purpose of mass spectrometry-based analytical methods and analytical systems

The context of validation for mass spectrometry (MS)-based methods is critically analysed. The focus is on the fitness for purpose depending on the task of the method. Information is given on commonly accepted procedures for the implementation and acceptance of analytical methods as ‘confirmatory methods’ according to EU criteria, and strategies for measurement. Attention is paid to the problem of matrix effects in the case of liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry-based procedures, since according to recent guidelines for bioanalytical method validations, there is a need to evaluate matrix effects during development and validation of LC-MS methods “to ensure that precision, selectivity and sensitivity will not be compromised”. Beneficial aspects of the qualification process to ensure the suitability of the MS analytical system are also evaluated and discussed.     

Instrumental validation in capillary electrophoresis and checkpoints for method validation

Capillary electrophoresis (CE) is increasingly being used in regulated and testing environments which demand validation. The design, development and production of CE instrumentation should be governed by qualifications which ensure the quality of the finished product. The vendor should therefore provide guidelines and procedures which assist the user in ensuring the adequate operation of the instrumentation and especially in designing installation qualification (IQ) and operational qualification/performance verification (OQ/PV) procedures. OQ/PV should test those functions of an instrument which directly affect the CE analysis, i.e. voltage, temperature, injection precision and detector function. In validation of CE methods care should be taken that those aspects which directly affect the precision of peak parameters are appreciated. The relationship between CE instrumentation, chemistry and validation parameters is discussed and guidelines are presented for definition of a CE method for submission to regulatory authorities.     

Status of radiation processing dosimetry

Several milestones have marked the field of radiation processing dosimetry since IMRP 7. Among them are the IAEA symposium on High Dose Dosimetry for Radiation Processing and the international Workshops on Dosimetry for Radiation Processing organized by the ASTM.

Several standards have been or are being published by the ASTM in this field, both on dosimetry procedures and on the proper use of specific dosimeter systems. Several individuals are involved in this international cooperation which contribute significantly to the broader understanding of the role of dosimetry in radiation processing.

The importance of dosimetry is emphasized in the standards on radiation sterilization which are currently drafted by the European standards organization CEN and by the international standards organization ISO. In both standards, dosimetry plays key roles in characterization of the facility, in qualification of the process and in routine process control.

As a function of the work on the standards, several issues are now receiving major attention. These include traceability and uncertainty limits of the dose measurements, calibration procedures, environmental influence and combination of influence factors such as dose rate and temperature.

The increased attention to these factors have increased the demands on existing dosimeter systems, and rather than new dosimeters, the latest years have seen improvements on established dosimeters.