Polysulfonylamines. CXX. Bis(tetrahydrothiophene‐S)gold(I) benzene‐1,2‐disulfonimidate

Both ions of the title compound, [Au(C₄H₈S)₂](C₆H₄NO₄S₂), display crystallographic twofold symmetry. The Au atom exhibits linear coordination, with Au—S = 2.2948 (14) Å and S—Au—S = 178.47 (9)°. The crystal packing consists of layers of anions connected by C—H?O hydrogen bonds; the cations occupy cavities in these layers and the ions are linked by Au?N contacts of 3.009 (7) Å. Further C—H?O interactions connect the layers.     

(Azulene‐1,3‐diyl)‐bis(nitronyl nitroxide) and (Azulene‐1,3‐diyl)‐bis(iminonitroxide) and Their Copper Complexes

In contrast to diradicals connected by alternant hydrocarbons, only a few studies on those connected by nonalternant hydrocarbons have been reported. The syntheses, structures, and magnetic properties of azulene‐1,3‐diyl linked bis(nitronyl nitroxide) (NN₂Az) and bis(iminonitroxide) (IN₂Az) diradicals and their Cu(hfac)₂ (hfac=hexafluoroacetylacetonate) complexes were investigated. NN₂Az was shown to have an intramolecular ferromagnetic interaction with J _obs/k _B=+10.0 K (H =−2J S ₁ ⋅S ₂) between (nitronyl nitroxide) spins, whereas IN₂Az was estimated to have a much weaker intramolecular magnetic interaction. The reactions of NN₂Az and IN₂Az with Cu(hfac)₂ gave a 1:2 [{Cu(hfac)₂}₂(NN₂Az)] complex and a 1:1 [Cu(hfac)₂(IN₂Az)] ⋅ C₆H₁₂ complex, respectively. [{Cu(hfac)₂}₂(NN₂Az)] showed strong intramolecular antiferromagnetic interactions (J _1‐Cu‐R/k _B≈−800 K, J _2‐Cu‐R/k _B≈−500 K) between the Cu^II spins and the coordinating NN spins, whereas [Cu(hfac)₂(IN₂Az)] exhibited a ferromagnetic exchange interaction (J _obs‐Cu‐R/k _B=+114 K) between the Cu^II spin and the imino‐coordinated iminonitroxide spin.     

trans‐Cyano(6‐methyl‐1,4,8,11‐tetraazacyclotetradecan‐6‐amine)cobalt(III) bis(perchlorate) hydrate and trans‐hydroxo(6‐methyl‐1,4,8,11‐tetraazacyclotetradecan‐6‐amine)cobalt(III) bis(perchlorate)

The crystal structures of a pair of closely related macrocyclic cyano‐ and hydroxopenta­amine­cobalt(III) complexes, as their perchlorate salts, are reported. Although the two complexes, [Co(CN)(C₁₁H₂₇N₅)](ClO₄)₂·H₂O and [Co(OH)(C₁₁H₂₇N₅)](ClO₄)₂, exhibit similar conformations, significant differences in the Co—N bond lengths arise from the influence of the sixth ligand (cyano as opposed to hydroxo). The ensuing hydrogen‐bonding patterns are also distinctly different. Disorder in the perchlorate anions was clearly resolved and this was rationalized on the basis of distinct hydrogen‐bonding motifs involving the anion O atoms and the N—H and O—H donors.     

Synthesis by ATRP of poly(ethylene‐co‐butylene)‐block‐polystyrene,poly(ethylene‐co‐butylene)‐block‐poly(4‐acetoxystyrene) and its hydrolysis product poly(ethylene‐co‐butylene)‐block‐poly(hydroxystyrene)

Diblock copolymers of poly(ethylene‐co‐butylene) and polystyrene or poly(4‐acetoxystyrene) are synthesized by atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) using a 2‐bromopropionic ester macroinitiator prepared from commercial monohydroxyl functional narrow dispersity hydrogenated polybutadiene (Kraton Liquid Polymer, L‐1203). ATRP carried out in bulk and in xylene solution with cuprous bromide and two different complexing agents 2,2′‐bipyridine (bipy) and 1,1,4,7,10,10‐hexamethyltriethylenetetraamine (HMTETA) yielded well‐defined diblock copolymers with polydispersities around 1,3. The diblock copolymer with poly(4‐acetoxystyrene) was hydrolyzed to the corresponding poly(4‐hydroxystyrene) sequence.     

Alkaline and enzymatic degradation of L‐lactide copolymers. II. Crystallized films of poly(L‐lactide‐co‐D‐lactide) and poly(L‐lactide) with similar crystallinities

Films of poly(L ‐lactide‐co‐D ‐lactide) [P(LLA‐DLA); 95/5] and poly(L ‐lactide) [i.e., poly(L ‐lactide acid) (PLLA)] were prepared by crystallization from the melt, and a comparative study of the crystallization effects on the alkaline and proteinase K catalyzed hydrolysis of the films was carried out. The hydrolyzed films were investigated with gravimetry, differential scanning calorimetry, polarimetry, and gel permeation chromatography, and the results were compared with those reported for amorphous‐made specimens. The alkaline hydrolyzability of the P(LLA‐DLA) (95/5) and PLLA films was determined solely by the initial crystallinity (X_c) and was not affected by the content of the incorporated D ‐lactide (DLA) unit in the polymer chain; this was in marked contrast to the fact that the enzymatic hydrolyzability depended on not only the initial X_c value but also the DLA unit content. The alkaline hydrolysis rate of the P(LLA‐DLA) (95/5) and PLLA films and the enzymatic hydrolysis rate (R_EH) of the P(LLA‐DLA) (95/5) films decreased linearly as the initial X_c value increased. This meant that the hydrolyzability of the restricted amorphous regions was very similar to that of the free amorphous regions. In contrast, R_EH of the PLLA films decreased nonlinearly with the initial X_c value, and this nonlinear dependence was caused by the fact that in the PLLA films the restricted amorphous regions were much more hydrolysis‐resistant than the free amorphous regions. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 43: 1064‐1075, 2005     

Undecacarbonyl(methylcyclopentadienyl)‐tetrahedro‐triiridiummolybdenum,undecacarbonyl(tetramethylcyclopentadienyl)‐tetrahedro‐triiridiummolybdenum and undecacarbonyl(pentamethylcyclopentadienyl)‐tetrahedro‐triiridiummolybdenum

The three title compounds tri‐μ‐carbonyl‐1:2κ²C;1:3κ²C;2:3κ²C‐octacarbonyl‐1κC,2κ²C,3κ²C,4κ³C‐η⁵‐methylcyclopentadienyl‐tetrahedro‐triiridiummolybdenum(3 Ir—Ir)(3 Ir—Mo), tri‐μ‐carbonyl‐1:2κ²C;1:3κ²C;2:3κ²C‐octacarbonyl‐1κC,2κ²C,3κ²C,4κ³C‐η⁵‐tetramethylcyclopentadienyl‐tetrahedro‐triiridiummolybdenum(3 Ir—Ir)(3 Ir—Mo) and tri‐μ‐carbonyl‐1:2κ²C;1:3κ²C;2:3κ²C‐octacarbonyl‐1κC,2κ²C,3κ²C,4κ³C‐η⁵‐pentamethylcyclopentadienyl‐tetrahedro‐triiridiummolybdenum(3 Ir—Ir)(3 Ir—Mo), [MoIr₃(η⁵‐C₅H_5?nMe_n)(μ‐CO)₃(CO)₈], where n = 1, 4 or 5, have a pseudo­tetrahedral MoIr₃ core geometry, with a η⁵‐C₅H_5?nMe_n group ligating the Mo atom, bridging carbonyls spanning the edges of an MoIr₂ face, and eight terminally bound carbonyls.     

Bis(tetra‐n‐butylammonium) (a redetermination at 150 K) and bis(tetraphenylarsonium) bis(1,3‐dithiole‐2‐thione‐4,5‐dithiolato)zinc(II) (at 300 K)

The title compounds are salts of the general form (Q⁺)₂[Zn(dmit)₂]^2?, where dmit corresponds to the ligand (C₃S₅)^? present in both and Q⁺ to the counter‐cations (ⁿBu₄N)⁺ [or C₁₆H₃₆N⁺] and (Ph₄As)⁺ [or C₂₄H₂₀As⁺], respectively. In the first case, Zn is in the 4e special positions of space group C2/c and hence the [Zn(dmit)₂]^2? dianion possesses twofold axial crystallographic symmetry. Including these, there are now 11 known examples of [Zn(dmit)₂]^2? or its analogues, with O replacing the exocyclic thione S, and [Zn(dmio)₂]^2? dianions in nine structures with various Q. Comparison of these reveals a remarkable variation in details of the conformation which the dianion may adopt in terms of Zn coordination, equivalence of the Zn—S bond lengths, displacement of Zn from the plane of the ligand and overall dianion shape.     

(2‐Methyl­quinolin‐8‐olato)­iron(III) and ‐copper(II) complexes

The crystal structures of tris(2‐methyl­quinolin‐8‐olato‐N,O)­iron(III), [Fe­(C₁₀­H₈­NO)₃], (I), and aqua­bis(2‐methyl­quinolin‐8‐olato‐N,O)­copper(II), [Cu­(C₁₀­H₈NO)₂­(H₂O)], (II), have been determined. Compound (I) has a distorted octahedral configuration, in which the central Fe atom is coordinated by three N atoms and three O atoms from three 2‐methylquinolin‐8‐olate ligands. The three Fe—O bond distances are in the range 1.934 (2)–1.947 (2) Å, while the three Fe—N bond distances range from 2.204 (2) to 2.405 (2) Å. In compound (II), the central Cu^II atom and H₂O group lie on the crystallographic twofold axis and the coordination geometry of the Cu^II atom is close to trigonal bipyramidal, with the three O atoms in the basal plane and the two N atoms in apical positions. The Cu—N bond length is 2.018 (5) Å. The Cu—O bond length in the basal positions is 1.991 (4) Å, while the Cu—O bond length in the apical position is 2.273 (6) Å. There is an intermolecular OW—H?O hydrogen bond which links the mol­ecules into a linear chain along the b axis.     

Hexakis(prop‐2‐enamide)copper(II) bis(perchlorate) and hexakis(prop‐2‐enamide)manganese(II) bis(perchlorate)

The structures of [Cu(AA)₆](ClO₄)₂, (I), and [Mn(AA)₆](ClO₄)₂, (II) (AA is acrylamide, also known as prop‐2‐enamide; C₃H₅NO), display both intra‐ and intermolecular N—H...O hydrogen bonding. A three‐dimensional network is propagated via the perchlorate counter‐ions. There are two crystallographically independent molecules in the copper complex, with the most significant difference between them being the conformation of one symmetry‐related pair of AA ligands which are in the unusual syn conformation. The copper complex exhibits syn/anti disorder of the =CH₂ group in one pair of symmetry‐related AA ligands. The Cu^II and Mn^II centres are both situated on centres of inversion. The copper complex cation has octahedral coordination geometry with typical Jahn–Teller distortions.     

meso‐Nitro‐ and meso‐Aminosubporphyrinatoboron(III)s and meso‐to‐meso Azosubporphyrinatoboron(III)s

meso‐Nitrosubporphyrinatoboron(III) was synthesized by nitration of meso‐free subporphyrin with AgNO₂/I₂. The subsequent reduction with a combination of NaBH₄ and Pd/C gave meso‐aminosubporphyrinatoboron(III). meso‐Nitro‐ and meso‐amino‐groups significantly influenced the electronic properties of subporphyrin, which has been confirmed by NMR and UV/Vis spectra, electrochemical analysis, and DFT calculations. Oxidation of meso‐aminosubporphyrinatoboron(III)s with PbO₂ cleanly gave meso‐to‐meso azosubporphyrinatoboron(III)s that exhibited almost coplanar conformations and large electronic interaction through the azo‐bridge.     

trans‐Bis(thioacetato‐S)bis(triphenylphosphine‐P)nickel(II)

In the title compound, [Ni(C₂H₃OS)₂(C₁₈H₁₅P)₂], the Ni atom lies on an inversion centre and the tri­phenyl phosphine and thio­acetate ligands are bonded to the central Ni^II atom in a trans fashion, with Ni—S = 2.2020 (8) and Ni—P = 2.2528 (8) Å, and angle S—Ni—P = 92.47 (3)°.     

Hydrated hexacyanometallate(III) salts of triaqua(18‐crown‐6)lanthanoid(III) and tetraaqua(18‐crown‐6)lanthanoid(III) cations containing nine‐ and ten‐coordinate lanthanoids

Tetraaqua(18‐crown‐6)cerium(III) hexacyanoferrate(III) dihydrate, [Ce(C₁₂H₂₄O₆)(H₂O)₄][Fe(CN)₆]·2H₂O, and tetraaqua(18‐crown‐6)neodymium(III) hexacyanoferrate(III) dihydrate, [Nd(C₁₂H₂₄O₆)(H₂O)₄][Fe(CN)₆]·2H₂O, are isomorphous and isostructural in the C2/c space group, where the cations, which contain ten‐coordinate lanthanoid centres, lie across twofold rotation axes and the anions lie across inversion centres. In these compounds, an extensive series of O—H...O and O—H...N hydrogen bonds links the components into a continuous three‐dimensional framework. Triaqua(18‐crown‐6)lanthanoid(III) hexacyanoferrate(III) dihydrate, [Ln(C₁₂H₂₄O₆)(H₂O)₃][Fe(CN)₆]·2H₂O, where Ln = Sm, Eu, Gd or Tb, are all isomorphous and isostructural in the P space group, as are triaqua(18‐crown‐6)gadolinium(III) hexacyanochromate(III) dihydrate, [Gd(C₁₂H₂₄O₆)(H₂O)₃][Cr(CN)₆]·2H₂O, and triaqua(18‐crown‐6)gadolinium(III) hexacyanocobaltate(III) dihydrate, [Gd(C₁₂H₂₄O₆)(H₂O)₃][Co(CN)₆]·2H₂O. In these compounds, there are two independent anions, both lying across inversion centres, and the lanthanoid centres exhibit nine‐coordination; in the crystal structures, an extensive series of hydrogen bonds links the components into a three‐dimensional framework.     

Insertion von Rhodizonsäure in die Gallium‐Gallium‐ bzw. Indium‐Indium‐Bindungen von Digallan(4)‐ bzw. Diindan(4)‐Verbindungen

Insertion of Rhodizonic Acid into the Gallium‐Gallium and Indium‐Indium Bonds of Digallane(4) and Diindane(4) Compounds Rhodizonic acid (C₆O₆H₂, 5, 6‐dihydroxy‐5‐cyclohexene‐1, 2, 3, 4‐tetraone) did not react with tetrakis[bis(trimethylsilyl)methyl] digallane(4) ( 1 ) and the corresponding diindium compound ( 2 ) by the transfer of protons. Instead the acid was completely inserted into the element‐element bonds of the starting compounds and the gallium or indium atoms were oxidized from the oxidation state of +II to +III. In contrast to the free acid, the OH groups of the products are not attached to neighbouring carbon atoms, but occupy the 1, 4‐positions of the central six‐membered rings. Both dialkylgallium and dialkylindium groups of the products ( 3 (Ga) and 4 (In)) are coordinated by two oxygen atoms. They adopt opposite positions at the C₆O₆ molecular core.