On the number of components in 2-factors of claw-free graphs

In this paper, we prove that if a claw-free graph G with minimum degree δ?4 has no maximal clique of two vertices, then G has a 2-factor with at most (|G|-1)/4 components. This upper bound is best possible. Additionally, we give a family of claw-free graphs with minimum degree δ?4 in which every 2-factor contains more than n/δ components.     

Super-connected edge transitive graphs

A graph G is said to be super-connected if any minimum cut of G isolates a vertex. In a previous work due to the second author of this note, super-connected graphs which are both vertex transitive and edge transitive are characterized. In this note, we generalize the characterization to edge transitive graphs which are not necessarily vertex transitive, showing that the only irreducible edge transitive graphs which are not super-connected are the cycles C_n(n?6) and the line graph of the 3-cube, where irreducible means the graph has no vertices with the same neighbor set. Furthermore, we give some sufficient conditions for reducible edge transitive graphs to be super-connected.     

Power domination in graphs

The problem of monitoring an electric power system by placing as few measurement devices in the system as possible is closely related to the well-known domination problem in graphs. In 1998, Haynes et al. considered the graph theoretical representation of this problem as a variation of the domination problem. They defined a set S to be a power dominating set of a graph if every vertex and every edge in the system is monitored by the set S (following a set of rules for power system monitoring). The power domination number γ_P(G) of a graph G is the minimum cardinality of a power dominating set of G. In this paper, we present upper bounds on the power domination number for a connected graph with at least three vertices and a connected claw-free cubic graph in terms of their order. The extremal graphs attaining the upper bounds are also characterized.     

Graphoidal bipartite graphs

A graphoidal cover of a graph G is a collection ψ of (not necessarily open) paths inG such that every path in ψ has at least two vertices, every vertex ofG is an internal vertex of at most one path in ψ and every edge of G is in exactly one path in ψ. Let Ω (ψ) denote the intersection graph of ψ. A graph G is said to be graphoidal if there exists a graphH and a graphoidal cover ψof H such that G is isomorphic to Ω(ψ). In this paper we study the properties of graphoidal graphs and obtain a forbidden subgraph characterisation of bipartite graphoidal graphs.     

Total domination stable graphs upon edge addition

A set S of vertices in a graph G is a total dominating set if every vertex of G is adjacent to some vertex in S. The minimum cardinality of a total dominating set of G is the total domination number of G. A graph is total domination edge addition stable if the addition of an arbitrary edge has no effect on the total domination number. In this paper, we characterize total domination edge addition stable graphs. We determine a sharp upper bound on the total domination number of total domination edge addition stable graphs, and we determine which combinations of order and total domination number are attainable. We finish this work with an investigation of claw-free total domination edge addition stable graphs.     

Hamiltonicity and pancyclicity of cartesian products of graphs

The cartesian product of a graph G with K₂ is called a prism over G. We extend known conditions for hamiltonicity and pancyclicity of the prism over a graph G to the cartesian product of G with paths, cycles, cliques and general graphs. In particular we give results involving cubic graphs and almost claw-free graphs.We also prove the following: Let G and H be two connected graphs. Let both G and H have a 2-factor. If Δ(G)≤g^′(H) and Δ(H)≤g^′(G) (we denote by g^′(F) the length of a shortest cycle in a 2-factor of a graph F taken over all 2-factorization of F), then G□H is hamiltonian.     

Vertex pancyclicity in quasi-claw-free graphs

A graph G is called quasi-claw-free if for any two vertices x and y with distance two there exists a vertex u∈N(x)∩N(y) such that N[u]⊆N[x]∪N[y]. This concept is a natural extension of the classical claw-free graphs. In this paper, we present two sufficient conditions for vertex pancyclicity in quasi-claw-free graphs, namely, quasilocally connected and almost locally connected graphs. Our results include some well-known results on claw-free graphs as special cases. We also give an affirmative answer to a problem proposed by Ainouche.     

Almost claw-free graphs

We say that G is almost claw-free if the vertices that are centers of induced claws (K_1,3) in G are independent and their neighborhoods are 2-dominated. Clearly, every claw-free graph is almost claw-free. It is shown that (i) every even connected almost claw-free graph has a perfect matching and (ii) every nontrivial locally connected K_1,4-free almost claw-free graph is fully cycle extendable.     

On Switching to H‐Free Graphs

In this article, we study the problem of deciding if, for a fixed graph H, a given graph is switching equivalent to an H‐free graph. Polynomial‐time algorithms are known for H having at most three vertices or isomorphic to P₄. We show that for H isomorphic to a claw, the problem is polynomial, too. On the other hand, we give infinitely many graphs H such that the problem is NP‐complete, thus solving an open problem [Kratochvíl, Ne?et?il and Zýka, Ann Discrete Math 51 (1992)]. Further, we give a characterization of graphs switching equivalent to a K_{1, 2}‐free graph by ten forbidden‐induced subgraphs, each having five vertices. We also give the forbidden‐induced subgraphs for graphs switching equivalent to a forest of bounded vertex degrees.     

Well-covered graphs and factors

A maximum independent set of vertices in a graph is a set of pairwise nonadjacent vertices of largest cardinality α. Plummer [Some covering concepts in graphs, J. Combin. Theory 8 (1970) 91-98] defined a graph to be well-covered, if every independent set is contained in a maximum independent set of G. Every well-covered graph G without isolated vertices has a perfect [1,2]-factor F_G, i.e. a spanning subgraph such that each component is 1-regular or 2-regular. Here, we characterize all well-covered graphs G satisfying α(G)=α(F_G) for some perfect [1,2]-factor F_G. This class contains all well-covered graphs G without isolated vertices of order n with α?(n-1)/2, and in particular all very well-covered graphs.     

Hamiltonian Cycles in Almost Claw-Free Graphs

 Some known results on claw-free graphs are generalized to the larger class of almost claw-free graphs. In this paper, we prove the following two results and conjecture that every 5-connected almost claw-free graph is hamiltonian. (1). Every 2-connected almost claw-free graph G∉J on n≤ 4 δ vertices is hamiltonian, where J is the set of all graphs defined as follows: any graph G in J can be decomposed into three disjoint connected subgraphs G ₁, G ₂ and G ₃ such that E _G (G _i , G _j ) = {u _i , u _j , v _i v _j } for i≠j and i,j = 1, 2, 3 (where u _i ≠v _i ∈V(G _i ) for i = 1, 2, 3). Moreover the bound 4δ is best possible, thereby fully generalizing several previous results. (2). Every 3-connected almost claw-free graph on at most 5δ−5 vertices is hamiltonian, hereby fully generalizing the corresponding result on claw-free graphs. Received: September 21, 1998 Final version received: August 18, 1999     

An edge-deletion problem for locally finite graphs

For each positive integer n, let T_n be the tree in which exactly one vertex has degree n and all the other vertices have degree n + 1. A graph G is called stable if its edge set is nonempty and if deleting an arbitrary edge of G there is always a component of the residue graph which is isomorphic to G. The question whether there are locally finite stable graphs that are not isomorphic to one of the graphs T_n is answered affirmatively by constructing an uncountable family of pairwise nonisomorphic, locally finite, stable graphs. Further, the following results are proved: (1) Among the locally finite trees containing no subdivision of T₂, the oneway infinite path T₁ is the only stable graph. (2) Among the locally finite graphs containing no two-way infinite path, T₁ is also the only stable graph.     

A new characterization of HH-free graphs

We show that a graph G has no houses and no holes if and only if for every connected induced subgraph H of G and every vertex in H, either the vertex is adjacent to all the other vertices in H, or it forms a 2-pair of H with some other vertex in H. As a consequence, there is a simple linear time algorithm to find a 2-pair in HH-free graphs. We also note that the class of Meyniel graphs admits an analogous characterization.     

Bounds on total domination in claw-free cubic graphs

A set S of vertices in a graph G is a total dominating set, denoted by TDS, of G if every vertex of G is adjacent to some vertex in S (other than itself). The minimum cardinality of a TDS of G is the total domination number of G, denoted by γ_t(G). If G does not contain K_1,3 as an induced subgraph, then G is said to be claw-free. It is shown in [D. Archdeacon, J. Ellis-Monaghan, D. Fischer, D. Froncek, P.C.B. Lam, S. Seager, B. Wei, R. Yuster, Some remarks on domination, J. Graph Theory 46 (2004) 207-210.] that if G is a graph of order n with minimum degree at least three, then γ_t(G)?n/2. Two infinite families of connected cubic graphs with total domination number one-half their orders are constructed in [O. Favaron, M.A. Henning, C.M. Mynhardt, J. Puech, Total domination in graphs with minimum degree three, J. Graph Theory 34(1) (2000) 9-19.] which shows that this bound of n/2 is sharp. However, every graph in these two families, except for K₄ and a cubic graph of order eight, contains a claw. It is therefore a natural question to ask whether this upper bound of n/2 can be improved if we restrict G to be a connected cubic claw-free graph of order at least 10. In this paper, we answer this question in the affirmative. We prove that if G is a connected claw-free cubic graph of order n?10, then γ_t(G)?5n/11.     

Tank-Ring Factors in Supereulerian Claw-Free Graphs

A graph G has a tank-ring factor F if F is a connected spanning subgraph with all vertices of degree 2 or 4 that consists of one cycle C and disjoint triangles attaching to exactly one vertex of C such that every component of G ? C contains exactly two vertices. In this paper, we show the following results. (1) Every supereulerian claw-free graph G with 1-hourglass property contains a tank-ring factor. (2) Every supereulerian claw-free graph with 2-hourglass property is Hamiltonian.     

Claw-free graphs. III. Circular interval graphs

Construct a graph as follows. Take a circle, and a collection of intervals from it, no three of which have union the entire circle; take a finite set of points V from the circle; and make a graph with vertex set V in which two vertices are adjacent if they both belong to one of the intervals. Such graphs are “long circular interval graphs,” and they form an important subclass of the class of all claw-free graphs. In this paper we characterize them by excluded induced subgraphs. This is a step towards the main goal of this series, to find a structural characterization of all claw-free graphs.This paper also gives an analysis of the connected claw-free graphs G with a clique the deletion of which disconnects G into two parts both with at least two vertices.     

Cube intersection concepts in median graphs

In this paper, we study different classes of intersection graphs of maximal hypercubes of median graphs. For a median graph G and k≥0, the intersection graph Q_k(G) is defined as the graph whose vertices are maximal hypercubes (by inclusion) in G, and two vertices H_x and H_y in Q_k(G) are adjacent whenever the intersection H_x∩H_y contains a subgraph isomorphic to Q_k. Characterizations of clique-graphs in terms of these intersection concepts when k>0, are presented. Furthermore, we introduce the so-called maximal 2-intersection graph of maximal hypercubes of a median graph G, denoted , whose vertices are maximal hypercubes of G, and two vertices are adjacent if the intersection of the corresponding hypercubes is not a proper subcube of some intersection of two maximal hypercubes. We show that a graph H is diamond-free if and only if there exists a median graph G such that H is isomorphic to . We also study convergence of median graphs to the one-vertex graph with respect to all these operations.     

Total domination in claw-free graphs with minimum degree 2

A set S of vertices in a graph G is a total dominating set (TDS) of G if every vertex of G is adjacent to some vertex in S. The minimum cardinality of a TDS of G is the total domination number of G, denoted by γ_t(G). A graph is claw-free if it does not contain K_1,3 as an induced subgraph. It is known [M.A. Henning, Graphs with large total domination number, J. Graph Theory 35(1) (2000) 21-45] that if G is a connected graph of order n with minimum degree at least two and G∉{C₃,C₅, C₆, C₁₀}, then γ_t(G)?4n/7. In this paper, we show that this upper bound can be improved if G is restricted to be a claw-free graph. We show that every connected claw-free graph G of order n and minimum degree at least two satisfies γ_t(G)?(n+2)/2 and we characterize those graphs for which γ_t(G)=⌊(n+2)/2⌋.     

Graph minors. I. Excluding a forest

The path-width of a graph is the minimum value ofk such that the graph can be obtained from a sequence of graphsG₁,…,G_r each of which has at mostk + 1 vertices, by identifying some vertices ofG_i pairwise with some ofG_i+1 (1 ≤ i < r). For every forestH it is proved that there is a numberk such that every graph with no minor isomorphic toH has path-width?k. This, together with results of other papers, yields a “good” algorithm to test for the presence of any fixed forest as a minor, and implies that ifP is any property of graphs such that some forest does not have propertyP, then the set of minor-minimal graphs without propertyP is finite.     

Finite common coverings of pairs of regular graphs

The graph G is a covering of the graph H if there exists a (projection) map p from the vertex set of G to the vertex set of H which induces a one-to-one correspondence between the vertices adjacent to v in G and the vertices adjacent to p(v) in H, for every vertex v of G. We show that for any two finite regular graphs G and H of the same degree, there exists a finite graph K that is simultaneously a covering both of G and H. The proof uses only Hall's theorem on 1-factors in regular bipartite graphs.