Phase reconstruction from magnitude of band-limited multidimensional signals

In this paper, the problem of phase reconstruction from magnitude of multidimensional band-limited functions is considered. It is shown that any irreducible band-limited function f(z₁…,z_n), z_i ? $\text{C}$, i=1, …, n, is uniquely determined from the magnitude of f(x₁…,x_n): | f(x₁…,x_n)|, x_i ? $\text{R}$, i=1,…, n, except for (1) linear shifts: ^{i(α1z1+…+α_n2n+β}), β, α_i?$\text{R}$, i=1,…, n; and (2) conjugation: $\text{f}{}^1\text{(z}{}_1{}^1\text{,…,z}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^1\text{)}$.     

On moment conditions for normed sums of independent variables and martingale differences

Let X₁, X₂,… be a sequence of i.i.d. random variables and S_n their partial sums. Necessary and sufficient conditions are given for $\text{{n}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>?1</mtext><mtext>q</mtext>}}\text{S}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{}}{}^{\mathrm{\propto }}{}_1$ to have uniformly bounded pth moments, 0<p<q?2.Some of the results are generalized to martingle differences.     

A new inequality for symmetric functions

Let x_i ≥ 0, y_i ≥ 0 for i = 1,…, n; and let a_j(x) be the elementary symmetric function of n variables given by a_j(x) = ∑_{1 ≤ ii < … <ij ≤ n}x_ii … x_ij. Define the partical ordering x <y if a_j(x) ≤ a_j(y), j = 1,… n. We show that $\text{x}\text{\$}\text{?}\text{y ? x}{}^{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{\$}\text{?}\text{y}{}^{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{, 0}\text{\$}\text{?}\text{α ≤ 1}$, where {x^α}_i = x^α_i. We also give a necessary and sufficient condition on a function f(t) such that x <y ? f(x) <f(y). Both results depend crucially on the following: If x <y there exists a piecewise differentiable path z(t), with z_i(t) ≥ 0, such that z(0) = x, z(1) = y, and z(s) <z(t) if 0 ≤ s ≤ t ≤ 1.     

A queueing model and a set of orthogonal polynomials

A single serving queueing model is studied where potential customers are discouraged at the rate λ_n = λqⁿ, 0 < q < 1, n is the queue length. The serving rate is μ_n = μ(1 ? qⁿ), n = 0, 1,…. The spectral function is computed and the corresponding set of orthogonal polynomials is studied in detail. The slightly more general model with $\text{λ}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{=}\text{λq}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{(1 + bq}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{)}\text{, μ}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{=}\text{μ(1 ? q}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{)}\text{(1 + bq}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{)}$ and the analogous orthogonal polynomials are also investigated. In both cases a method developed by Pollaczek is used which has been used very successfully to study new sets of orthogonal polynomials by Askey and Ismail.     

Measuring flatness in linear spaces

Let L be a finite-dimensional normed linear space and let M be a compact subset of L lying on one side of a hyperplane through 0. A measure of flatness for M is the number $\text{D(M) =}\text{inf}\text{{}\text{sup}\text{f(x)}\text{f(y)}\text{: x, y ? M}}$, where the infimum is over all f in $\text{L}{}^1$ which are positive on M. Thus D(M) = 1 if M is flat, but otherwise D(M) > 1. On the other hand, let E(M) be a second measure on M defined as follows: If M is linearly independent, E(M) = 1. If M is linearly dependent, then (1) let Z be a minimal, linearly dependent subset of M; (2) partition Z into mutually exclusive subsets U = {u₁, …, u_p} and V = {v₁, …, v_q} such that there exist positive coefficients a_i and b_i for which Σ_{i = 1}^pa_iu_i = Σ_{i = 1}^qb_iv_i; (3) let $\text{r =}\text{max}\text{{}\text{Σ}{}_{\mathrm{i\; =\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{Σ}{}_{\mathrm{i\; =\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{q}}\text{b}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{,}\text{Σ}{}_{\mathrm{i\; =\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{b}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{Σ}{}_{\mathrm{i\; =\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{q}}\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{}}$; (4) let E(M) be the supremum of all ratios r which can be formed by steps (1), (2) and (3). The main result of this paper is that these two measures are the same: D(M) = E(M). This result is then used to obtain results concerning the Banach distance-coefficient between an arbitrary finite-dimensional normed linear space and Hilbert space.     

Enumeration of pairs of permutations

Let π = (a₁, a₂, …, a_n), ? = (b₁, b₂, …, b_n) be two permutations of $\text{Z}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{= {1, 2, …, n}}$. A rise of π is pair a_i, a_i+1 with a_i < a_i+1; a fall is a pair a_i, a_i+1 with a_i > a_i+1. Thus, for i = 1, 2, …, n ? 1, the two pairs a_i, a_i+1; b_i, b_i+1 are either both rises, both falls, the first a rise and the second a fall or the first a fall and the second a rise. These possibilities are denoted by RR, FF, RF, FR. The paper is concerned with the enumeration of pairs π, p with a given number of RR, FF, RF, FR. In particular if ω_n denotes the number of pairs with RR forbidden, it is proved that $\text{∑}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}{}_0\text{ω}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{z}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{n!n!}\text{=}\text{1}\text{?(z)}$, $\text{?(z) = ∑}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}{}_0\text{(-1)}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{z}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{n!n!}$. More precisely if ω(n, k) denotes the number of pairs π, p with exactly k occurences of RR(or FF, RF, FR) then $\text{1 + ∑}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}{}_{\mathrm{n=1}}\text{z}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{n!n!}$$\text{∑}{}^{\mathrm{n?1}}{}_{\mathrm{k=0}}\text{ω(n, k)x}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{=}\text{(1 ? x)}\text{(?(z(1 ? x)) ? x)}$.     

Analytic inequalities with applications to special functions

Sharp inequalities are derived for certain (polynomial-like) functions of the real variables p_i (i = 1(1)σ) by interpreting p_i as the probabilities that various switches be thrown in certain directions. Parameters m_v in the inequalities are at first taken to be integers; later the inequalities are established when m_v are arbitrary real numbers. The side condition ∑p_i = 1 occurs throughout analysis, so there are many corollaries. Examples of the inequalities established are

$\text{∑}\text{i=1}\text{σ}\text{(1?p}{}_{\mathrm{i}}{}^{\mathrm{m}}\text{)}{}^{\mathrm{m}}\text{>K?1,}$

valid ifm>1

$\text{∑}\text{j=0}\text{r}\text{n}\text{j}\text{p}{}^{\mathrm{jm}}\text{(1?p}{}^{\mathrm{m}}\text{)}{}^{\mathrm{m?j}}\text{+}\text{1?}\text{∑}\text{j=0}\text{r}\text{n}\text{j}\text{p}{}^{\mathrm{j}}\text{(1?p?s)}{}^{\mathrm{n?j}}{}^{\mathrm{m}}\text{> 1+s}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>max</mtext><mtext>[m,n]</mtext>}}$

valid if m > 1, n > r + 1, 0 < p, s, p + s ? 1, and also valid if $\text{0 < m < 1, 0 < n < r + 1 (1 ? x)}{}^{\mathrm{u}}\text{+ x}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>u</mtext>}}\text{< 1,}\text{if}\text{1}\text{2}\text{< x < 1, u > 1}$. (1.03)     

Decomposable bilinear numerical radii

Let A be an n-square normal matrix over $\text{C}$, and Q_{m, n} be the set of strictly increasing integer sequences of length m chosen from 1,…, n. For α,β∈Q_{m, n} denote by A[α|β] the submatrix obtained from A by using rows numbered α and columns numbered β. For k∈{0,1,…,m} write z.sfnc;α∩β|=k if there exists a rearrangement of 1,…,m, say i₁,…,i_k, i_k+1,…,i_m, such that α(i_j)=β(i_j), j=1,…,k, and {α(i_k+1),…,α(i_m)};∩{β(i_k+1),…,β(i_m)}=ø. Let

be the group of n-square unitary matrices. Define the nonnegative number

$\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{(A)=}\text{max}\text{U∈}\textcolor{red}{}\text{|}\text{det}\text{(U}{}^1\text{AU) [α|β]|}$

, where |α∩β|=k. Theorem 1 establishes a bound for ?_k(A), 0?k<m?1, in terms of a classical variational inequality due to Fermat. Let A be positive semidefinite Hermitian, n?2m. Theorem 2 leads to an interlacing inequality which, in the case n=4, m=2, resolves in the affirmative the conjecture that

$\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{m}}\text{(A)??}{}_{\mathrm{m?1}}\text{(A)????}{}_0\text{(A)}$

.     

Extension de quelques theoremes sur les densites de series d'elements de n a des series de sous-ensembles finis de n

For a sequence A = {A_k} of finite subsets of N we introduce: $\text{δ(A) =}\text{inf}{}_{\mathrm{m?n}}\text{A(m)}\text{2}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$, $\text{d(A) =}\text{lim inf}{}_{\mathrm{n\to \infty }}\text{A(n)}\text{2}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$, where A(m) is the number of subsets A_k ? {1, 2, …, m}.The collection of all subsets of {1, …, n} together with the operation $\text{a ∪ b, (a ∩ b), (a 1 b = a ∪ b ? a ∩ b)}$ constitutes a finite semi-group N^∪ (semi-group N^∩) (group $\text{N}{}^1$). For N^∪, N^∩ we prove analogues of the Erdös-Landau theorem: δ(A+B) ? δ(A)(1+(2λ)^?1(1?δ(A>))), where B is a base of N of the average order λ. We prove for $\text{N}{}^{\mathrm{\cup }}\text{, N}{}^{\mathrm{\cap }}\text{, N}{}^1$ analogues of Schnirelmann's theorem (that δ(A) + δ(B) > 1 implies δ(A + B) = 1) and the inequalities λ ? 2h, where h is the order of the base.We introduce the concept of divisibility of subsets: a|b if b is a continuation of a. We prove an analog of the Davenport-Erdös theorem: if d(A) > 0, then there exists an infinite sequence {A_kr}, where A_kr | A_kr+1 for r = 1, 2, …. In Section 6 we consider for $\text{N∪, N∩, N1}$ analogues of Rohrbach inequality: $\text{2n}\text{? g(n) ? 2}\text{n}$, where g(n) = min k over the subsets {a₁ < … < a_k} ? {0, 1, 2, …, n}, such that every m? {0, 1, 2, …, n} can be expressed as m = a_i + a_j.Pour une série A = {A_k} de sous-ensembles finis de N on introduit les densités: $\text{δ(A) =}\text{inf}{}_{\mathrm{m?n}}\text{A(m)}\text{2}{}^{\mathrm{m}}$, $\text{d(A) =}\text{lim inf}{}_{\mathrm{n\to \infty }}\text{A(n)}\text{2}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$ où A(m) est le nombre d'ensembles A_k ? {1, 2, …, m}. L'ensemble de toutes les parties de {1, 2, …, n} devient, pour les opérations $\text{a ∪ b, a ∩ b, a 1 b = a ∪ b ? a ∩ b}$, un semi-groupe fini N^∪, N^∩ ou un groupe N¹ respectivement. Pour N^∪, N^∩ on démontre l'analogue du théorème de Erdös-Landau: δ(A + B) ? δ(A)(1 + (2λ)^?1(1?δ(A))), où B est une base de N d'ordre moyen λ. On démontre pour $\text{N}{}^{\mathrm{\cup }}\text{, N}{}^{\mathrm{\cap }}\text{, N}{}^1$ l'analogue du théorème de Schnirelmann (si δ(A) + δ(B) > 1, alors δ(A + B) = 1) et les inégalités λ ? 2h, où h est l'ordre de base. On introduit le rapport de divisibilité des enembles: a|b, si b est une continuation de a. On démontre l'analogue du théorème de Davenport-Erdös: si d(A) > 0, alors il existe une sous-série infinie {A_kr}, où A_kr|A_kr+1, pour r = 1, 2, … . Dans le Paragraphe 6 on envisage pour N^∪, $\text{N}{}^{\mathrm{\cap }}\text{, N}{}^1$ les analogues de l'inégalité de Rohrbach: $\text{2n}\text{? g(n) ? 2}\text{n}$, où g(n) = min k pour les ensembles {a₁ < … < a_k} ? {0, 1, 2, …, n} tels que pour tout m? {0, 1, 2, …, n} on a m = a_i + a_j.     

Limiting distributions of two random sequences

For fixed p (0 ≤ p ≤ 1), let {L₀, R₀} = {0, 1} and X₁ be a uniform random variable over {L₀, R₀}. With probability p let {L₁, R₁} = {L₀, X₁} or = {X₁, R₀} according as $\text{X}{}_1\text{≥}\text{1}\text{2}\text{(L}{}_0\text{+ R}{}_0\text{)}\text{or}\text{<}\text{1}\text{2}\text{(L}{}_0\text{+ R}{}_0\text{)}$; with probability 1 ? p let {L₁, R₁} = {X₁, R₀} or = {L₀, X₁} according as $\text{X}{}_1\text{≥}\text{1}\text{2}\text{(L}{}_0\text{+ R}{}_0\text{)}\text{or}\text{<}\text{1}\text{2}\text{(L}{}_0\text{+ R}{}_0\text{)}$, and let X₂ be a uniform random variable over {L₁, R₁}. For n ≥ 2, with probability p let {L_n, R_n} = {L_{n ? 1}, X_n} or = {X_n, R_{n ? 1}} according as $\text{X}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{≥}\text{1}\text{2}\text{(L}{}_{\mathrm{n\; ?\; 1}}\text{+ R}{}_{\mathrm{n\; ?\; 1}}\text{)}\text{or}\text{<}\text{1}\text{2}\text{(L}{}_{\mathrm{n\; ?\; 1}}\text{+ R}{}_{\mathrm{n\; ?\; 1}}\text{)}$, with probability 1 ? p let {L_n, R_n} = {X_n, R_{n ? 1}} or = {L_{n ? 1}, X_n} according as $\text{X}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{≥}\text{1}\text{2}\text{(L}{}_{\mathrm{n\; ?\; 1}}\text{+ R}{}_{\mathrm{n\; ?\; 1}}\text{)}\text{or}\text{<}\text{1}\text{2}\text{(L}{}_{\mathrm{n\; ?\; 1}}\text{+ R}{}_{\mathrm{n\; ?\; 1}}\text{)}$, and let X_{n + 1} be a uniform random variable over {L_n, R_n}. By this iterated procedure, a random sequence {X_n}_{n ≥ 1} is constructed, and it is easy to see that X_n converges to a random variable Y_p (say) almost surely as n → ∞. Then what is the distribution of Y_p? It is shown that the Beta, (2, 2) distribution is the distribution of Y₁; that is, the probability density function of Y₁ is g(y) = 6y(1 ? y) I_0,1(y). It is also shown that the distribution of Y₀ is not a known distribution but has some interesting properties (convexity and differentiability).     

Two-parameter Turan inequalities for ultraspherical and Laguerre polynomials

It is known that the classical orthogonal polynomials satisfy inequalities of the form U_n²(x) ? U_{n + 1}(x) U_{n ? 1}(x) > 0 when x lies in the spectral interval. These are called Turan inequalities. In this paper we will prove a generalized Turan inequality for ultraspherical and Laguerre polynomials. Specifically if P_n^λ(x) and L_n^α(x) are the ultraspherical and Laguerre polynomials and $\text{F}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^{\mathrm{\lambda }}\text{(x) =}\text{P}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^{\mathrm{\lambda }}\text{(x)}\text{P}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^{\mathrm{\lambda }}\text{(1)}\text{, G}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{(x) =}\text{L}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{(x)}\text{L}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{(0)}\text{,}\text{then}\text{F}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{(x) F}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^{\mathrm{\beta }}\text{(x) ? F}{}_{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{(x) F}{}_{\mathrm{n\; ?\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{\beta }}\text{(x) > 0, ? 1 < x < 1, ?}\text{1}\text{2}\text{< α ? β ? α + 1}\text{and}\text{G}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{(x) G}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^{\mathrm{\beta }}\text{(x) ? G}{}_{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{(x) G}{}_{\mathrm{n\; ?\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{\beta }}\text{(x) > 0, x > 0, 0 < α ? β ? α + 1}$. We also prove the inequality $\text{(n + 1) F}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{(x) F}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^{\mathrm{\beta }}\text{(x) ? nF}{}_{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{(x) F}{}_{\mathrm{n\; ?\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{\beta }}\text{(x) > A}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{[F}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{(x)]}{}^2\text{, ?1 < x < 1, ?}\text{1}\text{2}\text{< α ? β < α + 1,}\text{where}\text{A}{}_{\mathrm{n}}$ is a positive constant depending on α and β.     

Arithmetic in generalized Artin-Schreier extensions of k(x)

If k is a perfect field of characteristic p ≠ 0 and k(x) is the rational function field over k, it is possible to construct cyclic extensions K_n over k(x) such that [K : k(x)] = pⁿ using the concept of Witt vectors. This is accomplished in the following way; if [β₁, β₂,…, β_n] is a Witt vector over k(x) = K₀, then the Witt equation $\text{y}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{?}\text{y}\text{= β}$ generates a tower of extensions through $\text{K}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{= K}{}_{\mathrm{i?1}}\text{(}\text{y}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{)}$ where $\text{y}\text{= [}\text{y}{}_1\text{,}\text{y}{}_2\text{,…,}\text{y}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{]}$. In this paper, it is shown that there exists an alternate method of generating this tower which lends itself better for further constructions in K_n. This alternate generation has the form K_i = K_i?1(y_i); y_i^p ? y_i = B_i, where, as a divisor in K_i?1, B_i has the form . In this form q is prime to Πp_j^λ_j and each λ_j is positive and prime to p. As an application of this, the alternate generation is used to construct a lower-triangular form of the Hasse-Witt matrix of such a field K_n over an algebraically closed field of constants.     

A canonical decomposition of the probability measure of sets of isotropic random points in Rn

The probability measure of X = (x₀,…, x_r), where x₀,…, x_r are independent isotropic random points in $\text{R}$ⁿ (1 ≤ r ≤ n ? 1) with absolutely continuous distributions is, for a certain class of distributions of X, expressed as a product measure involving as factors the joint probability measure of (ω, ?), the probability measure of p, and the probability measure of $\text{Y}{}^1\text{= (y}{}_0{}^1\text{,…, y}{}_{\mathrm{r}}{}^1\text{)}$. Here ω is the r-subspace parallel to the r-flat η determined by X, ? is a unit vector in ω^⊥ with ‘initial’ point at the origin [ω^⊥ is the (n ? r)-subspace orthocomplementary to ω], p is the norm of the vector z from the origin to the orthogonal projection of the origin on η, and $\text{y}{}_{\mathrm{i}}{}^1\text{=}\text{(x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{? z)}\text{α(p}{}^2\text{)}$, where α is a scale factor determined by p. The probability measure for ω is the unique probability measure on the Grassmann manifold of r-subspaces in $\text{R}$ⁿ invariant under the group of rotations in $\text{R}$ⁿ, while the conditional probability measure of ? given ω is uniform on the boundary of the unit (n ? r)-ball in ω^⊥ with centre at the origin. The decomposition allows the evaluation of the moments, for a suitable class of distributions of X, of the r-volume of the simplicial convex hull of {x₀,…, x_r} for 1 ≤ r ≤ n.     

Orthogonal polynomials on the negative multinomial distribution

Orthogonal polynomials on the multivariate negative binomial distribution,

$\text{(1 + Θ)}{}^{\mathrm{?\alpha ?x}}\text{(}\text{π}\text{j=0}\text{p}\text{Θ}{}_{\mathrm{j}}{}^{\mathrm{x}}\text{j}\text{x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{!}\text{)}\text{Γ(α + x)}\text{Γ(α)}$

where α > 0, Θ₁ > 0, x = ΣΘ_i, x₀, x₁, …, x_p = 0,1, … are constructed and their properties studied.     

Asymptotic independence of distributions of normalized order statistics of the underlying probability measure

Let n denote the sample size, and let r_i ∈ {1,…,n} fulfill the conditions r_i ? r_i?1 ≥ 5 for i = 1,…,k. It is proved that the joint normalized distribution of the order statistics Z_ri:n, i = 1,…,k, is independent of the underlying probability measure up to a remainder term of order $\text{O((}\text{k}\text{n}\text{)}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{)}$. A counterexample shows that, as far as central order statistics are concerned, this remainder term is not of the order $\text{O((}\text{k}\text{n}\text{)}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{)}$ if r_i ? r_i?1 = 1 for i = 2,…,k.     

A divided difference inequality for n-convex functions

For a₍₁₎ ? a₍₂₎ ? ··· ? a_(n) ? 0, b₍₁₎ ? b₍₂₎ ? ··· ? b_(n) ? 0, the ordered values of a_i, b_i, i = 1, 2,…, n, m fixed, m ? n, and p ? 1 it is shown that

$\text{∑}\text{1}\text{n}\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{b}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{?}\text{∑}\text{1}\text{m}\text{a}{}^{\mathrm{p}}{}_{\mathrm{(i)}}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>p</mtext>}}\text{∑}\text{1}\text{m?k?1}\text{b}{}^{\mathrm{q}}{}_{\mathrm{(i)}}\text{+}\text{b}{}^{\mathrm{q}}{}_{\mathrm{[m?k]}}\text{(k+1)}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>q</mtext><mtext>p</mtext>}}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>q</mtext>}}$

where $\text{1}\text{p}\text{+}\text{1}\text{q}\text{= 1, b}{}_{\mathrm{[j]}}\text{= b}{}_{\mathrm{(j)}}\text{+ b}{}_{\mathrm{(j\; +\; 1)}}\text{+ ··· + b}{}_{\mathrm{(n)}}\text{,}\text{and}\text{k}$ is the integer such that $\text{b}{}_{\mathrm{(m\; ?\; k\; ?\; 1)}}\text{?}\text{b[m ? k]}\text{(k + 1)}$ and $\text{b}{}_{\mathrm{(m\; ?\; k)}}\text{<}\text{b}{}_{\mathrm{[m\; ?\; k\; +\; 1]}}\text{k}$. The inequality is shown to be sharp. When p < 1 and a_(i)'s are in increasing order then the inequality is reversed.     

On the closability of some positive definite symmetric differential forms on c0∞(ω)

Let $\text{S}$ be a Dirichlet form in $\text{L}{}^2\text{(Ω; m)}$, where Ω is an open subset of $\text{R}$ⁿ, n ? 2, and m a Radon measure on Ω; for each integer k with 1 ? k < n, let $\text{S}$_k be a Dirichlet form on some k-dimensional submanifold $\text{Ω}{}_{\mathrm{k}}$ of Ω. The paper is devoted to the study of the closability of the forms E with domain $\text{C}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(Ω)}$ and defined by: $\text{(?,g)=}$$\text{E}$$\text{(?, g)+}\text{∑}\text{i}\text{p}\text{=1}$$\text{E}$k_i where 1 ? k_p < ? < n, and where , g^k_i denote restrictions of ?, g in $\text{C}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(Ω)}$ to . Conditions are given for E to be closable if, for each i = 1,…, p, one has k_i = n ? i. Other conditions are given for E to be nonclosable if, for some i, k_i < n ? i.     

A remark on the tail probability of a distribution

Let {X_n}_n≥1 be a sequence of independent and identically distributed random variables. For each integer n ≥ 1 and positive constants r, t, and ?, let S_n = Σ_j=1ⁿX_j and $\text{E{N}{}_{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(r, t, ?)} = Σ}{}_{\mathrm{n=1}}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{n}{}^{\mathrm{r?2}}\text{P{|S}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{| > ?n}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>r</mtext><mtext>t</mtext>}}\text{}}$. In this paper, we prove that (1) lim_?→0+?^α(r?1)E{N_∞(r, t, ?)} = K(r, t) if E(X₁) = 0, Var(X₁) = 1, and E(| X₁ |^t) < ∞, where 2 ≤ t < 2r ≤ 2t, $\text{K(r, t) =}\text{{2}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>\alpha (r?1)</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{Γ(}\text{(1 + α(r ? 1))}\text{2}\text{)}}\text{{(r ? 1) Γ(}\text{1}\text{2}\text{)}}$, and $\text{α =}\text{2t}\text{(2r ? t)}$; (2) $\text{lim}{}_{\mathrm{?\to 0+}}\text{G(t, ?)}\text{H(t, ?)}\text{= 0}$ if 2 < t < 4, E(X₁) = 0, Var(X₁) > 0, and E(|X₁|^t) < ∞, where G(t, ?) = E{N_∞(t, t, ?)} = Σ_n=1^∞n^t?2P{| S_n | > ?n} → ∞ as ? → 0+ and $\text{H(t, ?) = E{N}{}_{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(t, t, ?)} = Σ}{}_{\mathrm{n=1}}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{n}{}^{\mathrm{t?2}}\text{P{| S}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{| > ?n}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>2</mtext><mtext>t</mtext>}}\text{} → ∞}\text{as}\text{? → 0+}$, i.e., H(t, ?) goes to infinity much faster than G(t, ?) as ? → 0+ if 2 < t < 4, E(X₁) = 0, Var(X₁) > 0, and E(| X₁ |^t) < ∞. Our results provide us with a much better and deeper understanding of the tail probability of a distribution.