Network DEA efficiency in input–output models: With an application to OECD countries

We undertake network efficiency analysis within an input–output model that allows us to assess potential technical efficiency gains by comparing technologies corresponding to different economies. Input–output tables represent a network where different sectoral nodes use primary inputs (endowments) to produce intermediate input and outputs (according to sectoral technologies), and satisfy final demand (preferences). Within the input–output framework it is possible to optimize primary inputs allocation, intermediate production and final demand production by way of non-parametric data envelopment analysis (DEA) techniques. DEA allows us to model the different subtechnologies corresponding to alternative production processes, to assess efficient resource allocation among them, and to determine potential output gains if inefficiencies were dealt with. The proposed model optimizes the underlying multi-stage technologies that the input–output system comprises identifying the best practice economies. The model is applied to a set of OECD countries.     

具有非期望产出的混联网络DEA模型

数据包络分析(DEA)是评价系统相对有效性的分析方法,网络DEA模型在评价企业的经济效益、管理效益等实际问题中有着广泛的应用.在网络DEA模型的基础上考虑非期望产出要素,提出了具有非期望产出的混联网络DEA模型.研究了新模型的系统弱DEA有效与各子阶段弱DEA有效之间的关系,找到了无效决策单元的无效阶段,通过有针对性的改进能够提高系统的整体效率.最后通过数值算例验证了模型的可行性.     

An epsilon-based measure of efficiency in DEA – A third pole of technical efficiency

In DEA, we have two measures of technical efficiency with different characteristics: radial and non-radial. In this paper we compile them into a composite model called “epsilon-based measure (EBM).” For this purpose we introduce two parameters which connect radial and non-radial models. These two parameters are obtained from the newly defined affinity index between inputs or outputs along with principal component analysis on the affinity matrix. Thus, EBM takes into account diversity of input/output data and their relative importance for measuring technical efficiency.     

样本评价DEA模型的灵敏度分析

利用样本评价DEA模型的有效性理论,对决策单元的有效性进行灵敏度分析,给出了当移动因子d保持不变时,样本单元和决策单元的输入或输出变化后,决策单元的有效性保持不变的充分条件和必要条件,此外还给出了使决策单元的有效性保持不变的移动因子d的精确变化范围,最后通过实例表明了该灵敏度分析方法的可行性.     

Evaluating public school district performance via DEA gain functions

Existing measures of input allocative efficiency may be biased when estimated via data envelopment analysis (DEA) because of the possibility of slack in the constraints defining the reference technology. In this paper we derive a new measure of input allocative efficiency and compare it to existing measures. We measure efficiency by comparing the actual outputs of a decision-making unit relative to Koopmans’ efficient subset of the direct and indirect output possibility sets. We estimate the existing measures and our new measure of input allocative efficiency for a sample of public school districts operating in Texas.     

Cost allocation and convex data envelopment

This paper considers allocation rules. First, we demonstrate that costs allocated by the Aumann–Shapley and the Friedman–Moulin cost allocation rules are easy to determine in practice using convex envelopment of registered cost data and parametric programming. Second, from the linear programming problems involved it becomes clear that the allocation rules, technically speaking, allocate the non-zero value of the dual variable for a convexity constraint on to the output vector. Hence, the allocation rules can also be used to allocate inefficiencies in non-parametric efficiency measurement models such as Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). The convexity constraint of the BCC model introduces a non-zero slack in the objective function of the multiplier problem and we show that the cost allocation rules discussed in this paper can be used as candidates to allocate this slack value on to the input (or output) variables and hence enable a full allocation of the inefficiency on to the input (or output) variables as in the CCR model.     

Decomposition of technical and scale efficiencies in two-stage production systems

Conventional data envelopment analysis (DEA) models are used to measure the technical and scale efficiencies of a system when it is considered as a whole unit. This paper extends the efficiency measurement to two-stage systems where each stage has one process and all the outputs from the first process become the inputs of the second. An input-oriented DEA model for the first process is developed to separate the process efficiency into the input technical and scale efficiencies, and an output-oriented model is developed for the second process to separate the process efficiency into the output technical and scale efficiencies. Combining the two models, the system efficiency is expressed as the product of the overall technical and scale efficiencies, where the overall technical and scale efficiencies are the products of the corresponding efficiencies of the two processes, respectively. The detailed decomposition allows the sources of inefficiency to be identified.     

A variant of radial measure capable of dealing with negative inputs and outputs in data envelopment analysis

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a linear programming methodology to evaluate the relative technical efficiency for each member of a set of peer decision making units (DMUs) with multiple inputs and multiple outputs. It has been widely used to measure performance in many areas. A weakness of the traditional DEA model is that it cannot deal with negative input or output values. There have been many studies exploring this issue, and various approaches have been proposed.     

A new proposed model of restricted data envelopment analysis by correlation coefficients

The concept of efficiency in data envelopment analysis (DEA) is defined as weighted sum of outputs/weighted sum of inputs. In order to calculate the maximum efficiency score, each decision making unit (DMU)’s inputs and outputs are assigned to different weights. Hence, the classical DEA allows the weight flexibility. Therefore, even if they are important, the inputs or outputs of some DMUs can be assigned zero (0) weights. Thus, these inputs or outputs are neglected in the evaluation. Also, some DMUs may be defined as efficient even if they are inefficient. This situation leads to unrealistic results. Also to eliminate the problem of weight flexibility, weight restrictions are made in DEA. In our study, we proposed a new model which has not been published in the literature. We describe it as the restricted data envelopment analysis ((ARIII(COR))) model with correlation coefficients. The aim for developing this new model, is to take into account the relations between variables using correlation coefficients. Also, these relations were added as constraints to the CCR and BCC models. For this purpose, the correlation coefficients were used in the restrictions of input–output each one alone and their combination together. Inputs and outputs are related to the degree of correlation between each other in the production. Previous studies did not take into account the relationship between inputs/outputs variables. So, only with expert opinions or an objective method, weight restrictions have been made. In our study, the weights for input and output variables were determined, according to the correlations between input and output variables. The proposed new method is different from other methods in the literature, because the efficiency scores were calculated at the level of correlations between the input and/or output variables.     

Incorporating performance measures with target levels in data envelopment analysis

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a technique for evaluating relative efficiencies of peer decision making units (DMUs) which have multiple performance measures. These performance measures have to be classified as either inputs or outputs in DEA. DEA assumes that higher output levels and/or lower input levels indicate better performance. This study is motivated by the fact that there are performance measures (or factors) that cannot be classified as an input or output, because they have target levels with which all DMUs strive to achieve in order to attain the best practice, and any deviations from the target levels are not desirable and may indicate inefficiency. We show how such performance measures with target levels can be incorporated in DEA. We formulate a new production possibility set by extending the standard DEA production possibility set under variable returns-to-scale assumption based on a set of axiomatic properties postulated to suit the case of targeted factors. We develop three efficiency measures by extending the standard radial, slacks-based, and Nerlove–Luenberger measures. We illustrate the proposed model and efficiency measures by applying them to the efficiency evaluation of 36 US universities.     

A study of the relationship between competitiveness and technological innovation capability based on DEA models

Researchers and managers have been searching for appropriate methods to explore the relationship between technological innovation capability and competitiveness in recent years. This study attempts to find a systematic quantitative methodology to tackle this problem. In a recent survey covering 182 industrial innovative firms in China, the traditional data envelopment analysis (DEA) model was employed to analyze the data collected. The research results show that only 16% of the enterprises operate on the best-practice frontier and there are some inconsistencies between organizational innovation capability and competitiveness in many enterprises. Decreasing returns to scale were found among about 70% of the inefficient enterprises and increasing returns to scale were found among the remaining 30% of the inefficient enterprises. Thus the internal innovation harmonizing process in these enterprises is considerably inefficient. Based on the restricted ranges of the input/output factors, a multi-objective DEA projection model has also been developed in this study to provide a benchmark for auditing competitiveness. Research results further indicate that there is still much room for enterprises to improve competitiveness in situations of confining score ranges of technological innovation capability and competitiveness.     

A generalized model for weight restrictions in data envelopment analysis

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is designed to maximize the efficiency of a given decision-making unit (DMU) relative to all other DMUs by the choice of a set of input and output weights. One strength of the original models is the absence of any need of a priori information about the process of transforming inputs into outputs. However, in the practical application of DEA models, this strength has also become a weakness. Incorporation of process knowledge is more a norm than an exception in practice, and typically involves placing constraints on the input and/or output weights. New DEA formulations have evolved to address this issue. However, existing formulations for weight restrictions may underestimate relative efficiency or even render a problem infeasible. A new model formulation is introduced to address this issue. This formulation represents a significant improvement over existing DEA models by providing a generalized, comprehensive treatment for weight restrictions.     

Additive DEA based on MCDA with imprecise information

This work exploits links between Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA), with decision making units (DMUs) playing the role of decision alternatives. A novel perspective is suggested on the use of the additive DEA model in order to overcome some of its shortcomings, using concepts from multiattribute utility models with imprecise information. The underlying idea is to convert input and output factors into utility functions that are aggregated using a weighted sum (additive model of multiattribute utility theory), and then let each DMU choose the weights associated with these functions that minimize the difference of utility to the best DMU. The resulting additive DEA model with oriented projections has a clear rationale for its efficiency measures, and allows meaningful introduction of constraints on factor weights.     

Maintaining the Regular Ultra Passum Law in data envelopment analysis

The variable returns to scale data envelopment analysis (DEA) model is developed with a maintained hypothesis of convexity in input–output space. This hypothesis is not consistent with standard microeconomic production theory that posits an S-shape for the production frontier, i.e. for production technologies that obey the Regular Ultra Passum Law. Consequently, measures of technical efficiency assuming convexity are biased downward. In this paper, we provide a more general DEA model that allows the S-shape.     

The law of one price in data envelopment analysis: Restricting weight flexibility across firms

The Law of One Price (LoOP) states that all firms face the same prices for their inputs and outputs under market equilibrium. Taken here as a normative condition for ‘efficiency prices’, this law has powerful implications for productive efficiency analysis, which have remained unexploited thus far. This paper shows how LoOP-based weight restrictions can be incorporated in Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). Utilizing the relation between industry-level and firm-level cost efficiency measures, we propose to apply a set of input prices that is common for all firms and that maximizes the cost efficiency of the industry. Our framework allows for firm-specific output weights and for variable returns-to-scale, and preserves the linear programming structure of the standard DEA. We apply the proposed methodology to the evaluation of the research efficiency of economics departments of Dutch Universities. This application shows that the methodology is computationally tractable for practical efficiency analysis, and that it helps in deepening the DEA analysis.     

基于相关性分析与DEA模型的寿险公司效率分析

选取国内较有影响力的八家寿险公司作为研究对象,提出了基于相关性分析的DEA组合评价方法,该方法综合了相关性分析和DEA两种方法的优点.利用相关性分析的方法设计出评价寿险公司经营效率的投入和产出指标.然后综合运用DEA模型对这八家公司的经营效率进行研究,分析影响效率有效性的因素.     

Pro-efficiency: Data speak more than technical efficiency

In this study, we demonstrate a new method of addressing efficiency in situations in which only the input and output data are available, while evaluating efficiency more accurately than is possible via the ordinary data envelopment analysis (DEA). Technical efficiency is important, but management always desires information regarding the profit aspects of performance. In practice, however, the precise price data are frequently unavailable. Is it possible to approximate profit efficiency in the absence of price information? We develop a simple and usable approach, a linear programming model, for the evaluation of profit efficiency. Our approach implies technical efficiency in DEA and gives rise to the upper bound of profit efficiency, referred to as pro-efficiency. We also report a successful application of our method to a securities company, in which a comparison of the actual profit data and the pro-efficiency measures of the company’s branches demonstrates a significant correlation.     

在DEA中有关输出与输入的比值的模型的探讨

对以决策单元的输出与输入的比值为目标函数的多目标规划模型,证明了有关它与(弱)DEA有效(C2R)关系的三个定理.     

Cost efficiency and scale economies in general dental practices in the US: a non-parametric and parametric analysis of Colorado data

This paper uses both the non-parametric method of data envelopment analysis (DEA) and the econometric method of stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) to study the production technology and cost efficiency of the US dental care industry using practice level data. The American Dental Association 2006 survey data for a number of general dental practices in the state of Colorado in the US are used for the empirical analysis. The findings suggest that the cost efficiency score is between 0.79 and 0.87, on average, and the cost inefficiency is mostly due to allocative rather than technical inefficiency. The optimal output level for a dental practice to fully exploit the economies of scale is estimated to be at $1.68 million. Average cost at this level of output is 50.6 cents for each dollar of gross billing generated. The DEA and SFA approaches provide generally consistent results.     

Prior-Ratio-Analysis procedure to improve data envelopment analysis for performance measurement

This paper proposes the use of a Prior-Ratio-Analysis procedure, analysing output/input ratio indicators, allowing the improvement in efficiency measurement by means of data envelopment analysis (DEA) methodology. This prior analysis is based on the existence of a relationship of individual ratio in the firms to DEA efficiency scores. Use of the proposed procedure allows (i) detection of efficient units whose efficiency could be overestimated and (ii) identification of certain inputs/outputs enhancing particular behaviours. Accordingly, the DEA efficiency analysis could be improved with a major understanding about the factors determining the unit efficiency, and with a measure as a true indicator for discriminating between units, and for ranking them.