基于DEA和SFA的我国商业银行效率研究

本文利用板块数据,分别采用非参数前沿法中的DEA法和参数前沿法中的SFA法对我国十四家商业银行1997-2001期间的综合效率进行了测度,在此基础上对两种方法测度出的银行效率值排序进行了相关分析和一致性检验,结果表明两种方法测度出的银行效率在数值上有显著差异,但在是效率排序上具有很好的一致性。     

The measurement of returns to scale under a simultaneous occurrence of multiple solutions in a reference set and a supporting hyperplane

This research theoretically explores the measurement of RTS (Returns to Scale) under a possible occurrence of multiple solutions in DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis). In this study, the occurrence of multiple solutions is classified into Type I and Type II. Type I is an occurrence of multiple solutions in a reference set. Type II is an occurrence of multiple solutions on a supporting hyperplane passing on the reference set. Both Types I and II are very well known among DEA researchers, but previous research has not sufficiently explored a simultaneous occurrence of Type I and Type II in the RTS measurement. The two types of multiple solutions influence a degree of RTS in the DEA measurement. Such a quantitative issue on RTS is examined from the perspective of the Type I and Type II problems. To deal with such difficulties, a new linear programming approach is proposed to identify all efficient DMUs (Decision Making Units) that consist of a reference set, even if multiple solutions occur on the reference set. Based upon the research result, we can identify when multiple solutions of Type I and/or Type II occur on the RTS measurement and how to deal with such difficulties. Our research result makes it possible to measure a degree of scale economies (RTS) under the simultaneous occurrence of Type I and Type II.     

基于SFA与DEA模型的创新型城市科技创新效率实证研究

分别运用SFA模型和DEA模型对10个样本城市2001-2010年的科技创新效率进行定量测度,并对两种方法测度出的创新型城市科技创新效率值排序进行相关分析和一致性检验.结果表明两种方法测度出的创新型城市科技创新效率在数值上有显著差异,但在效率排序上具有很好的一致性.     

A semi-oriented radial measure for measuring the efficiency of decision making units with negative data,using DEA

Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is a nonparametric method for measuring the efficiency of a set of decision making units such as firms or public sector agencies, first introduced into the operational research and management science literature by Charnes, Cooper, and Rhodes (CCR) [Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Rhodes, E., 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research 2, 429–444]. The original DEA models were applicable only to technologies characterized by positive inputs/outputs. In subsequent literature there have been various approaches to enable DEA to deal with negative data.     

Assessing the cost-effectiveness of university academic recruitment and promotion policies,

This paper develops an approach for higher education institutions to assess the economic efficiency of their recruitment and promotion practices concerning academic staff. Research output potential is a key criterion in most academic appointments. Generally, there is a long lead time between the conduct of research and its ultimate value in the form of disseminated knowledge. This means higher education institutions usually reward financially staff on the prospect of research output, albeit on the basis of research outputs achieved up to the point of recruitment or discretionary salary rise (e.g. through promotion). We propose a Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) model which can be used retrospectively to set salary costs against corresponding research outputs achieved as a measure of the financial efficacy of past recruitment and promotion practices. The analysis can identify potential issues with those practices and lead to improvements for the future.     

Data envelopment analysis application in sustainability: The origins,development and future directions

Sustainable development and sustainability assessment have been of great interest to both academe and practitioners in the past decades. In this study, we review the literature on data envelopment analysis (DEA) applications in sustainability using citation-based approaches. A directional network is constructed based on citation relationships among DEA papers published in journals indexed by the Web of Science database from 1996 to March 2016. We first draw the citation chronological graph to present a complete picture of literature development trajectory since 1996. Then we identify the local main DEA development paths in sustainability research by assigning an importance index, namely search path count (SPC), to each link in the citation network. The local main path suggests that the current key route of DEA applications in sustainability focus on the environmental sustainability. Through the Kamada–Kawai layout algorithm, we find four research clusters in the literature including corporate sustainability assessment, regional sustainability assessment, sustainability composite indicator construction, and sustainability performance analysis. For each of the clusters, we further identify the key articles based on citation network and local citation scores, demonstrate the developmental trajectory of the literature, and suggest future research directions.     

A survey of data envelopment analysis in energy and environmental studies

Data envelopment analysis has gained great popularity in energy and environmental (E&E) modeling in recent years. In this paper, we present a literature survey on the application of data envelopment analysis (DEA) to E&E studies. We begin with an introduction to the most widely used DEA techniques, which is followed by a classification of 100 publications in this field. The main features observed are summarized. Issues related to the selection of DEA models in E&E studies are discussed.     

Scaling units via the canonical correlation analysis in the DEA context

This paper deals with the evaluation of decision making units which have multiple inputs and outputs. A new method (CCA/DEA) is developed where the Canonical Correlation Analysis (CCA) is utilized to provide a full rank scaling for all the units rather than a categorical classification (for efficient and inefficient units) as done by the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). The CCA/DEA approach is an attempt to bridge the gap between the frontier approach of DEA and the average tendencies of statistics (econometrics). Nonparametric statistical tests are employed to validate the consistency between the classification from the DEA and the postclassification that was generated by the CCA/DEA.     

The impact of mismeasurement in performance benchmarking: A Monte Carlo comparison of SFA and DEA with different multi-period budgeting strategies

Performance-based budgeting has received increasing attention from public and for-profit organizations in an effort to achieve a fair and balanced allocation of funds among their individual producers or operating units for overall system optimization. Although existing frontier estimation models can be used to measure and rank the performance of each producer, few studies have addressed how the mismeasurement by frontier estimation models affects the budget allocation and system performance. There is therefore a need for analysis of the accuracy of performance assessments in performance-based budgeting. This paper reports the results of a Monte Carlo analysis in which measurement errors are introduced and the system throughput in various experimental scenarios is compared. Each scenario assumes a different multi-period budgeting strategy and production frontier estimation model; the frontier estimation models considered are stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) and data envelopment analysis (DEA). The main results are as follows: (1) the selection of a proper budgeting strategy and benchmark model can lead to substantial improvement in the system throughput; (2) a “peanut butter” strategy outperforms a discriminative strategy in the presence of relatively high measurement errors, but a discriminative strategy is preferred for small measurement errors; (3) frontier estimation models outperform models with randomly-generated ranks even in cases with relatively high measurement errors; (4) SFA outperforms DEA for small measurement errors, but DEA becomes increasingly favorable relative to SFA as the measurement errors increase.     

Comparing frontier methods for economic–environmental trade-off analysis

This paper uses a mechanistic frontier approach as a reference to evaluate the ability of conventional parametric (SFA) and non-parametric (DEA) frontier approaches for analyzing economic–environmental trade-offs. Conventional frontier approaches are environmentally adjusted through incorporating the materials balance principle. The analysis is worked out for the Flemish pig finishing case, which is both representative and didactic. Results show that, on average, SFA and DEA yield adequate economic–environmental trade-offs. Both methods are good estimators for technical efficiency. Cost allocative and environmental allocative efficiency scores are less robust, due to the well-known methodological advantages and disadvantages of SFA and DEA. For particular firms, SFA, DEA and the mechanistic approach may yield different economic–environmental trade-offs. One has therefore to be careful when using conventional frontier approaches for firm-specific decision support. The mechanistic approach allows for optimizing performances per average present finisher, which is the production unit in pig finishing. Conventional frontier methods do not allow for this optimization since the number of average present finishers varies along the production functions. Since the mechanistic production function is based on underlying growth, feed uptake and mortality functions, additional firm-specific indicators can also be calculated at each point of the production function.     

A cognitive analytics management framework to select input and output variables for data envelopment analysis modeling of performance efficiency of banks using random forest and entropy of information

The efficiency of banks has a critical role in development of sound financial systems of countries. Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) has witnessed an increase in popularity for modeling the performance efficiency of banks. Such efficiency depends on the appropriate selection of input and output variables. In literature, no agreement exists on the selection of relevant variables. The disagreement has been an on-going debate among academic experts, and no diagnostic tools exist to identify variable misspecifications. A cognitive analytics management framework is proposed using three processes to address misspecifications. The cognitive process conducts an extensive review to identify the most common set of variables. The analytics process integrates a random forest method; a simulation method with a DEA measurement feedback; and Shannon Entropy to select the best DEA model and its relevant variables. Finally, a management process discusses the managerial insights to manage performance and impacts. A sample of data is collected on 303 top-world banks for the periods 2013 to 2015 from 49 countries. The experimental simulation results identified the best DEA model along with its associated variables, and addressed the misclassification of the total deposits. The paper concludes with the limitations and future research directions.

     

A classification of DEA models when the internal structure of the Decision Making Units is considered

We classify the contributions of DEA literature assessing Decision Making Units (DMUs) whose internal structure is known. Starting from an elementary framework, we define the main research areas as shared flow, multilevel and network models, depending on the assumptions they are subject to. For each model category, the principal mathematical formulations are introduced along with their main variants, extensions and applications. We also discuss the results of aggregating efficiency measures and of considering DMUs as submitted to a central authority that imposes constraints or targets on them. A common feature among the several models is that the efficiency evaluation of the DMU depends on the efficiency values of its subunits thereby increasing the discrimination power of DEA methodology with respect to the black box approach.     

A comparison of chance-constrained DEA and stochastic frontier analysis: bank efficiency in Taiwan

We employed both chance-constrained data envelopment analysis (CCDEA) and stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) to measure the technical efficiency of 39 banks in Taiwan. Estimated results show that there are significant differences in efficiency scores between chance-constrained DEA and stochastic frontier production function. The advanced setting of the chance-constrained mechanism of DEA does not change the instinctive differences between DEA and SFA approaches. We further find that the ownership variable is still a significant variable to explain the technical efficiency in Taiwan, irrespective of whether a DEA, CCDEA or SFA approach is used.     

Using DEA to assess NATO burden-sharing

As the member making many of the most visible contributions to NATO, the USA has often claimed that they shoulder the heaviest ‘burden’ in maintaining the objectives of the alliance. This claim has been backed by research which has concentrated on contributions such as defence expenditure and benefits such as protection from external threats. However, modern alliances entail the exchange of multiple forms of alliance benefits and liabilities and therefore the study of ‘burden-sharing’ in these alliances is a more complicated accounting problem than has been acknowledged by previous research. In this paper, burden-sharing is studied using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). This is a novel application of DEA. Instead of calculating relative ‘efficiencies’, the analysis produces a ‘net-burden index’ for each member nation of NATO. The results of the analysis indicate that whilst the USA shoulders a heavy burden, some other member nations, including Canada and Spain, may in fact shoulder a heavier burden.     

Using DEA as a tool for MCDM: some remarks

The purpose of this paper is to study proposals to use Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) as a tool for Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM). We first recall, using a simple model, the equivalence between the concept of ‘efficiency’ in DEA and that of ‘convex efficiency’ in MCDM. Examples are then used to show that various techniques that have been proposed in the DEA literature to deal with MCDM problems violate simple normative properties that are commonly accepted. We conclude with some remarks on the possible areas of interaction between DEA and MCDM.     

Using the bootstrap method to detect influential DMUs in data envelopment analysis

This paper proposes a statistical approach to handle the problem of detecting influential observations in deterministic nonparametric Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) models. We use the bootstrap method to estimate the underlying distribution for efficiency scores in order to avoid making unrealistic assumptions about the true distribution. To measure whether a specific DMU is truly influential, we employ relative entropy to detect the change in the distribution after the DMU in question is removed. A statistical test has been applied to determine the significance level. Two examples from the literature are discussed and comparisons to previous methods are provided.     

Measuring the relative efficiency of quality management practices in Turkish public and private universities

Using data envelopment analysis (DEA) in conjunction with stochastic frontier analysis (SFA), the aim of this study was to measure the relative efficiency of quality management (QM) practices in Turkish public and private universities. Based on the extant literature, a set of nine critical QM factors and seven performance indicators for Turkish universities were identified as input and output variables, respectively. SFA confirmed the existence of significant relationships between QM factors and performance indicators. DEA findings indicated that private universities with higher levels of QM efficiency on stakeholder-focus indicators achieved better performance in terms of fulfilling the expectations of their stakeholders. In contrast, public universities were more successful in managing QM practices for a superior teaching and research performance. Finally, after eliminating the managerial discrepancies, no significant structural efficiency difference was found between these two groups of universities through stakeholder-focus model, though some significant variation was noted in both factor-efficiency and total-efficiency models. As for total-efficiency model, we may infer that the structural differences found in favour of public universities for factor-efficiencies are counterbalanced by private universities which tend to focus more on their stakeholders in managing QM applications.     

Generalizing cross redundancy in data envelopment analysis

Lee and Choi (2010) proved that a cross redundant output in a CCR or BCC DEA study is unnecessary and can be eliminated from the model without affecting the results of the study. A cross redundant output, as characterized by Lee and Choi, can be expressed as a specially constrained linear combination of both some outputs and some inputs. This article extends the contributions of Lee and Choi (2010) in at least three ways: (i) by adding precision and clarity to some of their definitions; (ii) by introducing specific definitions that complement the ones in their paper; and (iii) by conducting some additional analysis on the impact of the presence of other types of linear dependencies among the inputs and outputs of a DEA model. One reason that it is important to identify and remove cross redundant inputs or outputs from DEA models is that the computational burden of the DEA study is decreased, especially in large applications.     

Calculating scale elasticity in DEA models

In the data envelopment analysis (DEA) efficiency literature, qualitative characterizations of returns to scale (increasing, constant, or decreasing) are most common. In economics it is standard to use the scale elasticity as a quantification of scale properties for a production function representing efficient operations. Our contributions are to review DEA practices, apply the concept of scale elasticity from economic multi-output production theory to DEA piecewise linear frontier production functions, and develop formulas for scale elasticity for radial projections of inefficient observations in the relative interior of fully dimensional facets. The formulas are applied to both constructed and real data and show the differences between scale elasticities for the two valid projections (input and output orientations). Instead of getting qualitative measures of returns to scale only as was done earlier in the DEA literature, we now get a quantitative range of scale elasticity values providing more information to policy-makers.     

Evaluation of Cost Efficiency in Finnish Electricity Distribution

This paper describes the process of developing an approach to evaluating the cost-efficiency of Finnish electricity distribution companies based on Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). The process consisted of three main stages (1) describing of the problem and exploring the key factors, (2) finding measurable quantities for the most essential factors, and (3) selecting the final model to be used in the regulation. Especially the selection of environmental variables, which allow the comparison of distribution companies operating in different environments, played a key role in the process. The selected model is used as a part of the regulation of distribution pricing.