首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 921 毫秒
1.
Let W ì \Bbb Rn\Omega \subset {\Bbb R}^n be a smooth domain and let u ? C0(W).u \in C^0(\Omega ). A classical result of potential theory states that¶¶-òSr([`(x)]) u(x)ds(x)=u([`(x)])-\kern-5mm\int\limits _{S_{r}(\bar x)} u(x)d\sigma (x)=u(\bar x)¶¶for every [`(x)] ? W\bar x\in \Omega and r > 0r>0 if and only if¶¶Du=0 in W.\Delta u=0 \hbox { in } \Omega.¶¶Here -òSr([`(x)]) u(x)ds(x)-\kern-5mm\int\limits _{S_{r}(\bar x)} u(x)d\sigma (x) denotes the average of u on the sphere Sr([`(x)])S_r(\bar x) of center [`(x)]\bar x and radius r. Our main result, which is a "localized" version of the above result, states:¶¶Theorem. Let u ? W2,1(W)u\in W^{2,1}(\Omega ) and let x ? Wx\in \Omega be a Lebesgue point of Du\Delta u such that¶¶-òSr([`(x)]) u d s- a = o(r2)-\kern-5mm\int\limits _{S_{r}(\bar x)} u d \sigma - \alpha =o(r^2)¶¶for some a ? \Bbb R\alpha \in \Bbb R and all sufficiently small r > 0.r>0. Then¶¶Du(x)=0.\Delta u(x)=0.  相似文献   

2.
Let W ì \BbbR2\Omega \subset \Bbb{R}^2 denote a bounded domain whose boundary ?W\partial \Omega is Lipschitz and contains a segment G0\Gamma_0 representing the austenite-twinned martensite interface. We prove infu ? W(W) òW j(?u(x,y))dxdy=0\displaystyle{\inf_{{u\in \cal W}(\Omega)} \int_\Omega \varphi(\nabla u(x,y))dxdy=0}  相似文献   

3.
We prove an analog of the Girsanov theorem for the stochastic differential equations with interaction
dz( u,t ) = a( z( u,t ),mt )dt + ò\mathbbR f( z( u,t ) - p )W( dp,dt ), dz\left( {u,t} \right) = a\left( {z\left( {u,t} \right),{\mu_t}} \right)dt + \int\limits_\mathbb{R} {f\left( {z\left( {u,t} \right) - p} \right)W\left( {dp,dt} \right)},  相似文献   

4.
Let W ì \mathbbRn \Omega \subset \mathbb{R}^n be an open set and l(x) | u |p,l = ( òW lp (x)| u(x) |p dx )1/p \text (1 \leqslant p < + ¥\text),\left| u \right|_{p,l} = \left( {\int\limits_\Omega {l^p (x)\left| {u(x)} \right|^p dx} } \right)^{1/p} {\text{ (1}} \leqslant p < + \infty {\text{),}}  相似文献   

5.
We study sufficient conditions for exponential decay at infinity for eigenfunctions of a class of integral equations in unbounded domains in ℝ n . We consider integral operators K whose kernels have the form
k( x,y ) = c( x,y )\frace - a| x - y || x - y |b , ( x,y ) ? W×W, k\left( {x,y} \right) = c\left( {x,y} \right)\frac{{{e^{ - \alpha \left| {x - y} \right|}}}}{{{{\left| {x - y} \right|}^\beta }}},\,\left( {x,y} \right) \in \Omega \times \Omega,  相似文献   

6.
In this paper, we will give some optimal estimates on the rotation number of the linear equation $\ifmmode\expandafter\ddot\else\expandafter\"\fi{x} + p(t)x = 0,$\ifmmode\expandafter\ddot\else\expandafter\"\fi{x} + p(t)x = 0, and that of the asymmetric equation: $\ifmmode\expandafter\ddot\else\expandafter\"\fi{x} + p(t)x_{ + } + q(t)x_{ - } = 0,$\ifmmode\expandafter\ddot\else\expandafter\"\fi{x} + p(t)x_{ + } + q(t)x_{ - } = 0, where p(t) and q(t) are almost periodic functions and x + = max{ x,0} ,  x - = min{ x,0} .x_{ + } = \max \{ x,0\} ,\;x_{ - } = \min \{ x,0\} . These estimates are obtained by introducing some kind of new norms in the spaces of almost periodic functions.  相似文献   

7.
Let r\mathbbR \rho_{\mathbb{R}} be the classical Schrödinger representation of the Heisenberg group and let L \Lambda be a finite subset of \mathbbR ×\mathbbR \mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R} . The question of when the set of functions {t ? e2 pi y t f(t + x) = (r\mathbbR(x, y, 1) f)(t) : (x, y) ? L} \{t \mapsto e^{2 \pi i y t} f(t + x) = (\rho_{\mathbb{R}}(x, y, 1) f)(t) : (x, y) \in \Lambda\} is linearly independent for all f ? L2(\mathbbR), f 1 0 f \in L^2(\mathbb{R}), f \neq 0 , arises from Gabor analysis. We investigate an analogous problem for locally compact abelian groups G. For a finite subset L \Lambda of G ×[^(G)] G \times \widehat{G} and rG \rho_G the Schrödinger representation of the Heisenberg group associated with G, we give a necessary and in many situations also sufficient condition for the set {rG (x, w, 1)f : (x, w) ? L} \{\rho_G (x, w, 1)f : (x, w) \in \Lambda\} to be linearly independent for all f ? L2(G), f 1 0 f \in L^2(G), f \neq 0 .  相似文献   

8.
This paper is concerned with the following periodic Hamiltonian elliptic system
{l-Du+V(x)u=g(x,v) in  \mathbbRN,-Dv+V(x)v=f(x,u) in  \mathbbRN,u(x)? 0 and v(x)?0 as  |x|?¥,\left \{\begin{array}{l}-\Delta u+V(x)u=g(x,v)\, {\rm in }\,\mathbb{R}^N,\\-\Delta v+V(x)v=f(x,u)\, {\rm in }\, \mathbb{R}^N,\\ u(x)\to 0\, {\rm and}\,v(x)\to0\, {\rm as }\,|x|\to\infty,\end{array}\right.  相似文献   

9.
In this paper we consider existence, asymptotic behavior near the boundary and uniqueness of positive solutions to the problem ${\rm div}_x (|\nabla_x u|^{p-2}\nabla_xu)(x,y) + {\rm div}_y (|\nabla_y u|^{q-2}\nabla_y u) (x, y) = u^r(x, y)$ in a bounded domain ${\Omega \subset \mathbb{R}^N \times \mathbb{R}^M}In this paper we consider existence, asymptotic behavior near the boundary and uniqueness of positive solutions to the problem
divx (|?x u|p-2?xu)(x,y) + divy (|?y u|q-2?y u) (x, y) = ur(x, y){\rm div}_x (|\nabla_x u|^{p-2}\nabla_xu)(x,y) + {\rm div}_y (|\nabla_y u|^{q-2}\nabla_y u) (x, y) = u^r(x, y)  相似文献   

10.
Let X be a normed space and V be a convex subset of X. Let a\colon \mathbbR+ ? \mathbbR+{\alpha \colon \mathbb{R}_+ \to \mathbb{R}_+}. A function f \colon V ? \mathbbR{f \colon V \to \mathbb{R}} is called α-midconvex if
f (\fracx + y2)-\fracf(x) + f(y)2 £ a(||x - y||)    for  x, y ? V.f \left(\frac{x + y}{2}\right)-\frac{f(x) + f(y)}{2}\leq \alpha(\|x - y\|)\quad {\rm for} \, x, y \in V.  相似文献   

11.
We prove global, up to the boundary of a domain ${{\it \Omega}\subset\mathbb {R}^n}We prove global, up to the boundary of a domain W ì \mathbb Rn{{\it \Omega}\subset\mathbb {R}^n}, Lipschitz regularity results for almost minimizers of functionals of the form
u ? òW g(x, u(x), ?u(x)) dx.u \mapsto \int \limits_{\Omega} g(x, u(x), \nabla u(x))\,dx.  相似文献   

12.
We prove that the solution operators et (f, y){\cal e}_t (\phi , \psi ) for the nonlinear wave equations with supercritical nonlinearities are not Lipschitz mappings from a subset of the finite-energy space ([(H)\dot]1 ?Lr+1) ×L2(\dot {H}^1 \cap L_{\rho +1}) \times L_2 to [(H)\dot]sq\dot {H}^s_{q'} for t 1 0t\neq 0, and 0 £ s £ 1,0\leq s\leq 1, (n+1)/(1/2-1/q¢) = 1(n+1)/(1/2-1/q')= 1. This is in contrast to the subcritical case, where the corresponding operators are Lipschitz mappings ([3], [6]). Here et(f, y)=u(·, t){\cal e}_t(\phi , \psi )=u(\cdot , t), where u is a solution of {
?2tu-Dxu+ m2u+|u|r-1u=0,  t > 0,  x ? \Bbb Rn,
u|t=0(x)=f(x),
?tu|t=0(x)=y(x).
\left\{\matrix {\partial ^2_tu-\Delta _xu+ m^2u+|u|^{\rho -1}u=0, \, t>0, \, x \in {\Bbb R}^n,\cr u\vert _{t=0}(x)=\phi (x),\hfill\cr \partial _tu\vert _{t=0}(x)=\psi (x). \hfill}\right. where n 3 4, m 3 0n \geq 4, m\geq 0 and r > r* = (n+2)/(n-2)\rho >\rho ^\ast =(n+2)/(n-2) in the supercritical case.  相似文献   

13.
The paper describes the general form of an ordinary differential equation of the second order which allows a nontrivial global transformation consisting of the change of the independent variable and of a nonvanishing factor. A result given by J. Aczél is generalized. A functional equation of the form
f( t,uy,wy + uuz ) = f( x,y,z )u2 u+ g( t,x,u,u,w )uz + h( t,x,u,u,w )y + 2uwzf\left( {t,\upsilon y,wy + u\upsilon z} \right) = f\left( {x,y,z} \right)u^2 \upsilon + g\left( {t,x,u,\upsilon ,w} \right)\upsilon z + h\left( {t,x,u,\upsilon ,w} \right)y + 2uwz  相似文献   

14.
We study the first vanishing time for solutions of the Cauchy–Dirichlet problem for the 2m-order (m ≥ 1) semilinear parabolic equation ${u_t + Lu + a(x) |u|^{q-1}u=0,\,0 < q < 1}We study the first vanishing time for solutions of the Cauchy–Dirichlet problem for the 2m-order (m ≥ 1) semilinear parabolic equation ut + Lu + a(x) |u|q-1u=0, 0 < q < 1{u_t + Lu + a(x) |u|^{q-1}u=0,\,0 < q < 1} with a(x) ≥ 0 bounded in the bounded domain W ì \mathbb RN{\Omega \subset \mathbb R^N}. We prove that if N 1 2m{N \ne 2m} and ò01 s-1 (meas\nolimits {x ? W: |a(x)| £ s })q ds < ¥, q = min(\frac2mN,1){\int_0^1 s^{-1} (\mathop{\rm meas}\nolimits \{x \in \Omega : |a(x)| \leq s \})^\theta {\rm d}s < \infty,\ \theta=\min\left(\frac{2m}N,1\right)}, then the solution u vanishes in a finite time. When N = 2m, the same property holds if ${\int_0^1 s^{-1} \left( \mathop{\rm meas}\nolimits \{x \in \Omega : |a(x)| \leq s \} \right) \ln \left( \mathop{\rm meas}\nolimits \{x \in \Omega : |a(x)| \leq s \} \right) {\rm d}s > - \infty}${\int_0^1 s^{-1} \left( \mathop{\rm meas}\nolimits \{x \in \Omega : |a(x)| \leq s \} \right) \ln \left( \mathop{\rm meas}\nolimits \{x \in \Omega : |a(x)| \leq s \} \right) {\rm d}s > - \infty}.  相似文献   

15.
For the damped-driven KdV equation $ \dot{u}-{\nu}u_{xx} + u_{xxx} - 6uu_{x} = \sqrt{\nu}\,\eta(t, x), x \in S^1, \int udx \equiv \int \eta dx \equiv 0, $ with 0 < ν ≤ 1 and smooth in x white in t random force η, we study the limiting long-time behaviour of the KdV integrals of motions (I 1, I 2, . . . ), evaluated along a solution u ν (t, x), as ν → 0. We prove that for ${0 \leq \tau := {\nu}t \lesssim 1}For the damped-driven KdV equation
[(u)\dot]-nuxx + uxxx - 6uux = ?{n} h(t, x), x ? S1, òudx o òhdx o 0, \dot{u}-{\nu}u_{xx} + u_{xxx} - 6uu_{x} = \sqrt{\nu}\,\eta(t, x), x \in S^1, \int udx \equiv \int \eta dx \equiv 0,  相似文献   

16.
Let (M,g) be a connected compact manifold, C3 smooth and without boundary, equipped with a Riemannian distance d(x,y). If s : M ? M s : M \to M is merely Borel and never maps positive volume into zero volume, we show s = t °u s = t \circ u factors uniquely a.e. into the composition of a map t(x) = expx[-?y(x)] t(x) = {\rm exp}_x[-\nabla\psi(x)] and a volume-preserving map u : M ? M u : M \to M , where y: M ? \bold R \psi : M \to {\bold R} satisfies the additional property that (yc)c = y (\psi^c)^c = \psi with yc(y) :=inf{c(x,y) - y(x) | x ? M} \psi^c(y) :={\rm inf}\{c(x,y) - \psi(x)\,\vert\,x \in M\} and c(x,y) = d2(x,y)/2. Like the factorization it generalizes from Euclidean space, this non-linear decomposition can be linearized around the identity to yield the Hodge decomposition of vector fields.¶The results are obtained by solving a Riemannian version of the Monge--Kantorovich problem, which means minimizing the expected value of the cost c(x,y) for transporting one distribution f 3 0 f \ge 0 of mass in L1(M) onto another. Parallel results for other strictly convex cost functions c(x,y) 3 0 c(x,y) \ge 0 of the Riemannian distance on non-compact manifolds are briefly discussed.  相似文献   

17.
We generalize a Hilbert space result by Auscher, McIntosh and Nahmod to arbitrary Banach spaces X and to not densely defined injective sectorial operators A. A convenient tool proves to be a certain universal extrapolation space associated with A. We characterize the real interpolation space ( X,D( Aa ) ?R( Aa ) )q,p{\left( {X,\mathcal{D}{\left( {A^{\alpha } } \right)} \cap \mathcal{R}{\left( {A^{\alpha } } \right)}} \right)}_{{\theta ,p}} as
{ x  ?  X|t - q\textRea y1 ( tA )xt - q\textRea y2 ( tA )x ? L*p ( ( 0,¥ );X ) } {\left\{ {x\, \in \,X|t^{{ - \theta {\text{Re}}\alpha }} \psi _{1} {\left( {tA} \right)}x,\,t^{{ - \theta {\text{Re}}\alpha }} \psi _{2} {\left( {tA} \right)}x \in L_{*}^{p} {\left( {{\left( {0,\infty } \right)};X} \right)}} \right\}}  相似文献   

18.
Given a bounded open regular set W ì \mathbbR2{\Omega \subset \mathbb{R}^2} and x1, x2, ?, xm ? W{x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_m \in \Omega}, we give a sufficient condition for the problem
-div(a(u)?u) = r2 f(u) -{\rm div}(a(u)\nabla u)= \rho^{2} f(u)  相似文献   

19.
We talk about the following minimization problem:
minF( S): = òW d( x,S )\textdm(x), \min F\left( \Sigma \right): = \int\limits_\Omega {d\left( {x,\Sigma } \right){\text{d}}\mu (x),}  相似文献   

20.
On the assumption of the truth of the Riemann hypothesis for the Riemann zeta function we construct a class of modified von-Mangoldt functions with slightly better mean value properties than the well known function L\Lambda . For every e ? (0,1/2)\varepsilon \in (0,1/2) there is a [(L)\tilde] : \Bbb N ? \Bbb C\tilde {\Lambda} : \Bbb N \to \Bbb C such that¶ i) [(L)\tilde] (n) = L (n) (1 + O(n-1/4  logn))\tilde {\Lambda} (n) = \Lambda (n) (1 + O(n^{-1/4\,} \log n)) and¶ii) ?n \leqq x [(L)\tilde] (n) (1- [(n)/(x)]) = [(x)/2] + O(x1/4+e) (x \geqq 2).\sum \limits_{n \leqq x} \tilde {\Lambda} (n) \left(1- {{n}\over{x}}\right) = {{x}\over{2}} + O(x^{1/4+\varepsilon }) (x \geqq 2).¶Unfortunately, this does not lead to an improved error term estimation for the unweighted sum ?n \leqq x [(L)\tilde] (n)\sum \limits_{n \leqq x} \tilde {\Lambda} (n), which would be of importance for the distance between consecutive primes.  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号