An extremal problem on potentially Kr,s-graphic sequences

We consider a variation of a classical Turán-type extremal problem (F. Chung, R. Graham, Erd s on Graphs: His Legacy of Unsolved Problems, AK Peters Ltd., Wellesley, 1998, Chapter 3) as follows: Determine the smallest even integer σ(K_r,s,n) such that every n-term graphic sequence π=(d₁,d₂,…,d_n) with term sum σ(π)=d₁+d₂++d_nσ(K_r,s,n) is potentially K_r,s-graphic, where K_r,s is a r×s complete bipartite graph, i.e., π has a realization G containing K_r,s as its subgraph. In this paper, we first give sufficient conditions for a graphic sequence being potentially K_r,s-graphic, and then we determine σ(K_r,r,n) for r=3,4.     

Harary's conjectures on integral sum graphs

Let N denote the set of positive integers and Z denote all integers. The (integral) sum graph of a finite subset S N(Z) is the graph (S, E) with uv ε E if and only if u + v ε S. A graph G is said to be an (integral) sum graph if it is isomorphic to the (integral) sum graph of some S N(Z). The (integral) sum number of a given graph G is the smallest number of isolated nodes which when added to G result in an (integral) sum graph.

We show that the integral sum number of a complete graph with n 4 nodes equals 2n − 3, which proves a conjecture of Harary. And we disprove another conjecture of Harary by showing that there are infinitely many trees which are not caterpillars but are integral sum graphs.     

All trees are 1-embeddable and all except stars are 2-embeddable

A graph G with n vertices is said to be embeddable (in its complement) if there is an automorphism φ of K_n such that E(G) ∩ E(φ(G))=. It is known that all trees T with n (≥2) vertices and T K_1,n−1 are embeddable. We say that G is 1-embeddable if, for every edge e, there is an automorphism φ of K_n such that E(G) ∩ E(φ(G))={e};and that it is 2-embeddable if,for every pair e₁, e₂ of edges, there is an automorphism φ of K_n such that E(G) ∩ E(φ(G))={e₁, e₂}. We prove here that all trees with n (3) vertices are 1-embeddable; and that all trees T with n (4) vertices and T K_1,n−1 are 2-embeddable. In a certain sense, this result is sharp.     

Asymptotic bounds for some bipartite graph: complete graph Ramsey numbers

The Ramsey number r(H,K_n) is the smallest integer N so that each graph on N vertices that fails to contain H as a subgraph has independence number at least n. It is shown that r(K_2,m,K_n)(m−1+o(1))(n/log n)² and r(C_2m,K_n)c(n/log n)^m/(m−1) for m fixed and n→∞. Also r(K_2,n,K_n)=Θ(n³/log² n) and .     

Maximal IM-unextendable graphs

A graph G is maximal IM-unextendable if G is not induced matching extendable and, for every two nonadjacent vertices x and y, G+xy is induced matching extendable. We show in this paper that a graph G is maximal IM-unextendable if and only if G is isomorphic to M_r(K_s(K_n1K_n2K_nt)), where M_r is an induced matching of size r, r1, t=s+2, and each n_i is odd.     

Sum coloring and interval graphs: a tight upper bound for the minimum number of colors

The SUM COLORING problem consists of assigning a color c(v_i)Z⁺ to each vertex v_iV of a graph G=(V,E) so that adjacent nodes have different colors and the sum of the c(v_i)'s over all vertices v_iV is minimized. In this note we prove that the number of colors required to attain a minimum valued sum on arbitrary interval graphs does not exceed min{n;2χ(G)−1}. Examples from the papers [Discrete Math. 174 (1999) 125; Algorithmica 23 (1999) 109] show that the bound is tight.     

Bounds on the number of isolates in sum graph labeling

A simple undirected graph H is called a sum graph if there is a labeling L of the vertices of H into distinct positive integers such that any two vertices u and v of H are adjacent if and only if there is a vertex w with label L(w)=L(u)+L(v). The sum number σ(G) of a graph G=(V,E) is the least integer r such that the graph H consisting of G and r isolated vertices is a sum graph. It is clear that σ(G)|E|. In this paper, we discuss general upper and lower bounds on the sum number. In particular, we prove that, over all graphs G=(V,E) with fixed |V|3 and |E|, the average of σ(G) is at least

Full-size image

. In other words, for most graphs, σ(G)Ω(|E|).     

ContributionsChromatic Ramsey numbers

Suppose G is a graph. The chromatic Ramsey number r_c(G) of G is the least integer m such that there exists a graph F of chromatic number m for which the following is true: for any 2-colouring of the edges of F there is a monochromatic subgraph isomorphic to G. Let M_n = min[r_c(G): χ(G) = n]. It was conjectured by Burr et al. (1976) that M_n = (n − 1)² + 1. This conjecture has been confirmed previously for n 4. In this paper, we shall prove that the conjecture is true for n = 5. We shall also improve the upper bounds for M₆ and M₇.     

Split and balanced colorings of complete graphs

An (r, n)-split coloring of a complete graph is an edge coloring with r colors under which the vertex set is partitionable into r parts so that for each i, part i does not contain K_n in color i. This generalizes the notion of split graphs which correspond to (2, 2)-split colorings. The smallest N for which the complete graph K_N has a coloring which is not (r, n)-split is denoted by ƒ_r(n). Balanced (r,n)-colorings are defined as edge r-colorings of KN such that every subset of [N/r] vertices contains a monochromatic K_n in all colors. Then g_r(n) is defined as the smallest N such that K_N has a balanced (r, n)-coloring. The definitions imply that f_r(n) g_r(n). The paper gives estimates and exact values of these functions for various choices of parameters.     

Generalization of two results of Hilton on total-colourings of a graph

We generalize two results of Hilton on total-colourings of a graph. The first generalized result unifies several previous results/proof techniques of Bermond, Chen, Chew, Fu, Hilton, Wang, and Yap. Applying the second generalized result, we prove that if G K_{n, n} is such that Δ(G) = n − 1 and the complement of G with respect to K_{n, n} contains a 1-factor, then its total chromatic number is Δ(G) + 1.     

Multicolored forests in complete bipartite graphs

If the edges of a graph G are colored using k colors, we consider the color distribution for this coloring a=(a₁,a₂,…,a_k), in which a_i denotes the number of edges of color i for i=1,2,…,k. We find inequalities and majorization conditions on color distributions of the complete bipartite graph K_n,n which guarantee the existence of multicolored subgraphs: in particular, multicolored forests and trees. We end with a conjecture on partitions of K_n,n into multicolored trees.     

The coordinate representation of a graph and n-universal graph of radius 1

Every graph can be represented as the intersection graph on a family of closed unit cubes in Euclidean space Eⁿ. Cube vertices have integer coordinates. The coordinate matrix, A(G)={v_nk} of a graph G is defined by the set of cube coordinates. The imbedded dimension of a graph, Bp(G), is a number of columns in matrix A(G) such that each of them has at least two distinct elements v_nk≠v_pk. We show that Bp(G)=cub(G) for some graphs, and Bp(G)n−2 for any graph G on n vertices. The coordinate matrix uses to obtain the graph U of radius 1 with 3ⁿ⁻² vertices that contains as an induced subgraph a copy of any graph on n vertices.     

Bipartite dimensions and bipartite degrees of graphs

A cover (bipartite) of a graph G is a family of complete bipartite subgraphs of G whose edges cover G's edges. G'sbipartite dimension d(G) is the minimum cardinality of a cover, and its bipartite degree η(G) is the minimum over all covers of the maximum number of covering members incident to a vertex. We prove that d(G) equals the Boolean interval dimension of the irreflexive complement of G, identify the 21 minimal forbidden induced subgraphs for d 2, and investigate the forbidden graphs for d n that have the fewest vertices. We note that for complete graphs, d(K_n) = [log₂n], η(K_n) = d(K_n) for n 16, and η(K_n) is unbounded. The list of minimal forbidden induced subgraphs for η 2 is infinite. We identify two infinite families in this list along with all members that have fewer than seven vertices.     

Circulant graphs with det(−A(G))=−deg(G): codeterminants with Kn

Circulant graphs satisfying det(−A(G))=−deg(G) are used to construct arbitrarily large families of graphs with determinant equal to that of the complete graph K_n.     

Decomposition of some planar graphs into trees

We prove that each simple planar graph G whose all faces are quadrilaterals can be decomposed into two disjoint trees T_r and T_b such that V(T_r) = V(G − u) and V(T_b) = V(G − v) for any two non-adjacent vertices u and v of G.     

Solution to an extremal problem on bigraphic pairs with a <Emphasis Type="Italic">Z</Emphasis><Subscript>3</Subscript>-connected realization

Let S=(a₁,...,a_m; b₁,...,b_n), where a₁,...,a_m and b₁,...,b_n are two nonincreasing sequences of nonnegative integers. The pair S=(a₁,...,a_m; b₁,...,b_n) is said to be a bigraphic pair if there is a simple bipartite graph G=(X ∪ Y, E) such that a₁,...,a_m and b₁,...,b_n are the degrees of the vertices in X and Y, respectively. Let Z₃ be the cyclic group of order 3. Define σ(Z₃, m, n) to be the minimum integer k such that every bigraphic pair S=(a₁,...,a_m; b₁,...,b_n) with a_m, b_n ≥ 2 and σ(S)=a₁ +... + a_m ≥ k has a Z₃-connected realization. For n=m, Yin[Discrete Math., 339, 2018-2026 (2016)] recently determined the values of σ(Z₃, m, m) for m ≥ 4. In this paper, we completely determine the values of σ(Z₃, m, n) for m ≥ n ≥ 4.     

Some results on characterizing the edges of connected graphs with a given domination number

A dominating set for a graph G = (V, E) is a subset of vertices V′ V such that for all v ε V − V′ there exists some u ε V′ for which {v, u} ε E. The domination number of G is the size of its smallest dominating set(s). For a given graph G with minimum size dominating set D, let m₁ (G, D) denote the number of edges that have neither endpoint in D, and let m₂ (G, D) denote the number of edges that have at least one endpoint in D. We characterize the possible values that the pair (m₁ (G, D), m₂ (G, D)) can attain for connected graphs having a given domination number.     

k-Subdomination in graphs

For a positive integer k, a k-subdominating function of a graph G=(V,E) is a function f : V→{−1,1} such that ∑_uNG[v]f(u)1 for at least k vertices v of G. The k-subdomination number of G, denoted by γ_ks(G), is the minimum of ∑_vVf(v) taken over all k-subdominating functions f of G. In this article, we prove a conjecture for k-subdomination on trees proposed by Cockayne and Mynhardt. We also give a lower bound for γ_ks(G) in terms of the degree sequence of G. This generalizes some known results on the k-subdomination number γ_ks(G), the signed domination number γ_s(G) and the majority domination number γ_maj(G).     

Primitive graphs with given exponents and minimum number of edges

A graph G = (V, E) on n vertices is primitive if there is a positive integer k such that for each pair of vertices u, v of G, there is a walk of length k from u to v. The minimum value of such an integer, k, is the exponent, exp(G), of G. In this paper, we find the minimum number, h(n, k), of edges of a simple graph G on n vertices with exponent k, and we characterize all graphs which have h(n, k) edges when k is 3 or even.     

On the planarity of jump graphs

For a graph G of size m1 and edge-induced subgraphs F and H of size k (1km), the subgraph H is said to be obtained from F by an edge jump if there exist four distinct vertices u,v,w, and x in G such that uvE(F), wxE(G)−E(F), and H=F−uv+wx. The minimum number of edge jumps required to transform F into H is the k-jump distance from F to H. For a graph G of size m1 and an integer k with 1km, the k-jump graph J_k(G) is that graph whose vertices correspond to the edge-induced subgraphs of size k of G and where two vertices of J_k(G) are adjacent if and only if the k-jump distance between the corresponding subgraphs is 1. All connected graphs G for which J₂(G) is planar are determined.