Benchmark optimization and attribute identification for improvement of container terminals

The aim of this paper is to optimize the benchmarks and prioritize the variables of decision-making units (DMUs) in data envelopment analysis (DEA) model. In DEA, there is no scope to differentiate and identify threats for efficient DMUs from the inefficient set. Although benchmarks in DEA allow for identification of targets for improvement, it does not prioritize targets or prescribe level-wise improvement path for inefficient units. This paper presents a decision tree based DEA model to enhance the capability and flexibility of classical DEA. The approach is illustrated through its application to container port industry. The method proceeds by construction of multiple efficient frontiers to identify threats for efficient/inefficient DMUs, provide level-wise reference set for inefficient terminals and diagnose the factors that differentiate the performance of inefficient DMUs. It is followed by identification of significant attributes crucial for improvement in different performance levels. The application of this approach will enable decision makers to identify threats and opportunities facing their business and to improve inefficient units relative to their maximum capacity. In addition, it will help them to make intelligent investment on target factors that can improve their firms’ productivity.     

Improving discrimination in data envelopment analysis: PCA–DEA or variable reduction

Within the data envelopment analysis context, problems of discrimination between efficient and inefficient decision-making units often arise, particularly if there are a relatively large number of variables with respect to observations. This paper applies Monte Carlo simulation to generalize and compare two discrimination improving methods; principal component analysis applied to data envelopment analysis (PCA–DEA) and variable reduction based on partial covariance (VR). Performance criteria are based on the percentage of observations incorrectly classified; efficient decision-making units mistakenly defined as inefficient and inefficient units defined as efficient. A trade-off was observed with both methods improving discrimination by reducing the probability of the latter error at the expense of a small increase in the probability of the former error. A comparison of the methodologies demonstrates that PCA–DEA provides a more powerful tool than VR with consistently more accurate results. PCA–DEA is applied to all basic DEA models and guidelines for its application are presented in order to minimize misclassification and prove particularly useful when analyzing relatively small datasets, removing the need for additional preference information.     

Gradual technical and scale efficiency improvement in DEA

In data envelopment analysis (DEA) an inefficient unit can be projected onto an efficient target that is far away, i.e. reaching the target may demand large reductions in inputs and increases in outputs. When the inputs and outputs modifications planned are large, it may be troublesome to carry them out all at once. In order to help an inefficient unit reach a distant target, a strategy of gradual improvements with successive, intermediate targets has been proposed. This paper extends such approach to the variable returns to scale (VRS) case. In the VRS scenario we distinguish between units that are technical efficient and those that are not. On the one hand, for those units that are not technical efficient the proposed approach determines successive intermediate targets leading to the technical efficiency frontier, i.e. the priority for those units is to attain technical efficiency. On the other hand, for those units that are technical efficient but not scale efficient the proposed approach computes a sequence of targets ending in the global efficiency frontier, i.e. when technical efficiency is guaranteed the goal is then to attain global efficiency. In both cases, the successive targets are obtained by iteratively solving specific DEA models that take into account given bounds on the rates of change in inputs and outputs that the unit can implement in each step.     

Computation of efficient targets in DEA models with production trade-offs and weight restrictions

Recently new models of data envelopment analysis (DEA) were introduced that incorporate production trade-offs between inputs and outputs or based on them weight restrictions. In this paper, we develop a computational procedure suitable for the practical application of such models. We show that the standard two-stage optimisation procedure used in DEA to test the full efficiency of units and identify their efficient targets may work incorrectly in the new models. The modified procedure consists of three stages: the first evaluates the radial efficiency of the unit, the second identifies its efficient target, and the third its reference set of efficient peers. Each stage requires solving one linear program for each unit.     

Radii of Classification Preservation in Data Envelopment Analysis: a Case Study of ‘Program Follow-Through’

Sensitivity and robustness of efficiency classifications for the additive model and its geometric equivalents in Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) are addressed. The minimum distance (measured by a Tchebycheff norm) separating an organization from reclassification is computed via linear programming formulations and shown to constitute a generalized ‘residual’ for each organization. Without this sensitivity information, findings can be distorted when marginally efficient or inefficient units are distinguished solely on the basis of their classification. Analysis of these residuals from an earlier (inconclusive) DEA study further reveals how substantive differences in a sample's underlying groups can be detected. Properties of group efficiency and group proximity to the efficient frontier are investigated using these new indicators.     

Data envelopment analysis with imprecise data

In original data envelopment analysis (DEA) models, inputs and outputs are measured by exact values on a ratio scale. Cooper et al. [Management Science, 45 (1999) 597–607] recently addressed the problem of imprecise data in DEA, in its general form. We develop in this paper an alternative approach for dealing with imprecise data in DEA. Our approach is to transform a non-linear DEA model to a linear programming equivalent, on the basis of the original data set, by applying transformations only on the variables. Upper and lower bounds for the efficiency scores of the units are then defined as natural outcomes of our formulations. It is our specific formulation that enables us to proceed further in discriminating among the efficient units by means of a post-DEA model and the endurance indices. We then proceed still further in formulating another post-DEA model for determining input thresholds that turn an inefficient unit to an efficient one.     

DEA and the discriminant analysis of ratios for ranking units

The purpose of this study is to develop a new method which provides for given inputs and outputs the best common weights for all the units that discriminate optimally between the efficient and inefficient units as pregiven by the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), in order to rank all the units on the same scale. This new method, Discriminant Data Envelopment Analysis of Ratios (DR/DEA), presents a further post-optimality analysis of DEA for organizational units when their multiple inputs and outputs are given. We construct the ratio between the composite output and the composite input, where their common weights are computed by a new non-linear optimization of goodness of separation between the two pregiven groups. A practical use of DR/DEA is that the common weights may be utilized for ranking the units on a unified scale. DR/DEA is a new use of a two-group discriminant criterion that has been presented here for ratios, rather than the traditional discriminant analysis which applies to a linear function. Moreover, non-parametric statistical tests are employed to verify the consistency between the classification from DEA (efficient and inefficient units) and the post-classification as generated by DR/DEA.     

Random effects logistic regression model for data envelopment analysis with correlated decision making units

This study attempts to exploit information from environmental variables together with data envelopment analysis (DEA) efficiency scores for efficiency predictions of groups with more limited information. Based on DEA efficiency scores, decision-making units (DMUs) are sorted into two sets containing efficient and inefficient units, respectively. Then they are reshuffled into homogeneous groups with respect to environmental factors. We assume that the efficiency of DMUs in such a homogeneous group would be correlated. However, efficiency of different groups would vary. A beta binomial logistic model is proposed to fit such phenomena and is applied to predict the performance of a new group of commercialization projects for given environmental characteristics.     

链式网络DEA模型

数据包络分析(DEA)是评价决策单元(DMU)相对有效性的一种工具,现已得到广泛的应用.传统的DEA不考虑系统内部结构,而是将系统作为一个"黑箱"来度量效率.针对多阶段网络结构提出一个新的网络DEA模型—链式网络DEA模型.研究网络决策单元的网络DEA有效性及各个阶段的弱DEA有效性之间的关系,给出了网络DEA有效的充分必要条件.若网络决策单元不是网络DEA有效的,根据模型可以指出系统在哪些阶段是无效的.     

The interval efficiency based on the optimistic and pessimistic points of view

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a data-oriented approach for evaluating the performances of a set of peer entities called decision-making units (DMUs), whose performance is determined based on multiple measures. The traditional DEA, which is based on the concept of efficiency frontier (output frontier), determines the best efficiency score that can be assigned to each DMU. Based on these scores, DMUs are classified into DEA-efficient (optimistic efficient) or DEA-non-efficient (optimistic non-efficient) units, and the DEA-efficient DMUs determine the efficiency frontier. There is a comparable approach which uses the concept of inefficiency frontier (input frontier) for determining the worst relative efficiency score that can be assigned to each DMU. DMUs on the inefficiency frontier are specified as DEA-inefficient or pessimistic inefficient, and those that do not lie on the inefficient frontier, are declared to be DEA-non-inefficient or pessimistic non-inefficient. In this paper, we argue that both relative efficiencies should be considered simultaneously, and any approach that considers only one of them will be biased. For measuring the overall performance of the DMUs, we propose to integrate both efficiencies in the form of an interval, and we call the proposed DEA models for efficiency measurement the bounded DEA models. In this way, the efficiency interval provides the decision maker with all the possible values of efficiency, which reflect various perspectives. A numerical example is presented to illustrate the application of the proposed DEA models.     

测算具有方向技术效率的DEA方法

本文总结了现有技术效率的主要测算方法，借鉴定向技术距离函数思想，结合DEA思路，提出了一种新的用于技术效率指数测算的模型，并进一步探讨了如何识别决策单元的技术有效性和如何改进非技术有效决策单元的问题．着重分析了该技术效率指数模型与L型技术效率指数的关系，指出该模型是L型技术效率指数模型的一般形式．     

The Potential for Endogeneity Bias in Data Envelopment Analysis

Data envelopment analysis has become an important technique for modelling the relationship between inputs and outputs in the production process, particularly in the public sector. However, whenever measures of the output of public sector activity receive public attention, there is a strong possibility that there will be a feedback from the achieved output to the resources devoted to the activity. In other words, the level of resources is endogenous. The implications of such endogeneity for standard econometric estimation techniques are well known, and methods exist to deal with the problem. Most commentators have assumed that endogeneity poses no analogous problems for DEA because the technique merely places an envelope around feasible production possibilities. Using Monte Carlo simulation techniques, however, this paper shows that the efficiency estimates generated by DEA in the presence of endogeneity can be subject to bias, in the sense that inefficient units using low levels of the endogenous resource may be set tougher efficiency targets than equally inefficient units using more of the resource, particularly when sample sizes are small. The paper concludes that, in such circumstances, great caution should be exercised when comparing efficiency measures for units using different levels of the endogenous input.     

企业信息化建设投入产出的相对有效性分析

本利用数据包络分析方法,讨论了企业信息化建设投入产出的相对有效性问题,并且对非DEA有效性的决策单元在投入产出方面进行了调整,使之达到相对有效。     

A Complete Efficiency Ranking of Decision Making Units in Data Envelopment Analysis

The efficiency measures provided by DEA can be used for ranking Decision Making Units (DMUs), however, this ranking procedure does not yield relative rankings for those units with 100% efficiency. Andersen and Petersen have proposed a modified efficiency measure for efficient units which can be used for ranking, but this ranking breaks down in some cases, and can be unstable when one of the DMUs has a relatively small value for some of its inputs. This paper proposes an alternative efficiency measure, based on a different optimization problem that removes the difficulties.     

Sensitivity and stability analysis on the first and second levels of efficiency score relative to data error

In data envelopment analysis (DEA), efficient decision making units (DMUs) are of primary importance as they define the efficient frontier. The current paper develops a new sensitivity analysis approach for a category DMUs and finds the stability radius for all efficient DMUs. By means of combining some classic DEA models and with the condition that the efficiency scores of efficient DMUs remain unchanged, we are able to determine what perturbations of the data can be tolerated before efficient DMUs become inefficient. Our approach generalizes the conventional sensitivity analysis approach in which the inputs of efficient DMUs increase and their outputs decrease, while the inputs of inefficient DMUs decrease and their outputs increase. We find the maximum quantity of perturbations of data so that all first level efficient DMUs remain at the same level.     

An application of DEA for comparative analysis and ranking of regions in Serbia with regards to social-economic development

In this paper, we use data envelopment analysis (DEA) to estimate how well regions in Serbia utilize their resources. Based on data for four inputs and four outputs we applied an output-oriented CCR DEA model and it appears that 17 out of 30 regions are efficient. For each inefficient unit, DEA identifies the sources and level of inefficiency for each input and output. An output-oriented set of targets is determined for 13 inefficient regions. In addition, the possibilities of combining DEA and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) in evaluating performance are explored. The efficient regions are ranked using a cross efficiency matrix and an output-oriented version of Andersen–Petersen’s DEA model and the results are analyzed and compared.     

Multicriteria approaches for ranking of efficient units in DEA models

Data envelopment analysis models usually split decision making units into two basic groups, efficient and inefficient. Efficiency score of inefficient units allows their ranking but efficient units cannot be ranked directly because of their maximum efficiency. That is why there are formulated several models for ranking of efficient units. The paper presents two original models for ranking of efficient units in data envelopment analysis—they are based on multiple criteria decision making techniques—goal programming and analytic hierarchy process. The first model uses goal programming methodology and minimizes either the sum of undesirable deviations or maximal undesirable deviation from the efficient frontier. The second approach is analytic hierarchy process model for ranking of efficient units. The two presented models are compared with several super-efficiency models and other approaches for ranking decision making units in DEA models including definitions based on distances from optimistic and pessimistic envelopes and cross efficiency evaluation models. The results of the analysis by all presented models are illustrated on a real data set—evaluation of 194 bank branches of one of the Czech commercial banks.     

Reducing Weight Flexibility in Data Envelopment Analysis

This paper explores the consequences of total weight flexibility in data envelopment analysis (DEA) assessments of the efficiency of decision-making units, and it suggests one possible way of limiting such flexibility. It is suggested that total weight flexibility can lead to some decision-making units being assessed, in effect, on only a small subset of their inputs and outputs, while the rest of their inputs and outputs are all but ignored. Constraining the weights in DEA assessments overcomes this problem. The paper suggests one way in which constraints can be placed for the case where the decision-making units to be assessed use only a single input. The method is illustrated using data on local-authority rates departments. Finally, the paper discusses the interpretation and usefulness of the information obtained from DEA assessments involving weights constraints.     

A distance-based measure of super efficiency in data envelopment analysis: an application to gas companies

Conventional data envelopment analysis (DEA) assists decision makers in distinguishing between efficient and inefficient decision making units (DMUs) in a homogeneous group. Standard DEA models can not provide more information about efficient units. Super-efficiency DEA models can be used in ranking the performance of efficient DMUs and overcome this obstacle. Because of the possible infeasibility, the use of super efficiency models has been restricted. This research proposes a methodology to determine a distance-based measure of super-efficiency. The proposed methodology overcomes the infeasibility problem of the existing ranking methodologies. The applicability of the proposed model is illustrated in the context of the analysis of gas companies?? performance.