核心素养视角下“分子和原子”的教学实践与反思

通过对“分子和原子”教学实践的观察和分析,探讨了核心素养视角下化学概念教学的方法和策略。讨论认为,化学概念的诠释与演绎要基于学生的认知能力,要遵循“抽象→具象→抽象”的建构历程,而多维、深刻的参与性则有助于概念的高质量建构。     

国际科学教育视角下1-9年级学生“物质”核心概念进阶维度研究

概念转变理论、认知架构理论、概念形成理论都验证了核心概念建构的重要性。基于核心概念建构的进阶路径,介绍了学生理解“物质”概念进阶表征框架、“物质”和学生能力水平进阶表征框架、“物质”结构的学习进阶表征框架、“物质”核心概念区块理论表征框架和“物质”概念描述理论表征框架,并以“水的认识”为例分析了其构造图和结果空间。基于美国、英国、澳大利亚、爱尔兰、新加坡、加拿大阿尔伯塔省、加拿大安大略省、中国台湾、中国大陆9个国家或地区1至9年级科学课程文件,梳理了学生“物质”核心概念,并从“成分与辨识”“性质与应用”“变化与转化”3个视角划分了学生“物质”核心概念进阶维度,介绍了“物质”核心概念进阶测量方法,以期对我国科学教育有所启示。     

创建模型探讨化学概念本质的教学实践——以“饱和溶液”为例

中学化学“饱和溶液”概念的教学中,容易忽视学生已有的前概念,忽视概念建构的过程以及对概念背后本质原理的挖掘,常依托实验来建构概念,导致学生不能充分认识到概念的本质原理。尝试创建模型,采取将模型与实验相结合,用模型解释或预测实验的方式,帮助学生更好地建构并理解“饱和溶液”概念及其本质。     

化学实验“三三三”翻转教学模式的探索与实践*

针对当前化学实验翻转课堂教学模式中存在的不足,依托“云班课”,重构了以学生为中心的化学实验“三三三”翻转教学新模式,即将实验教学划分为“三个课堂”:自学课堂、理论课堂和实验课堂等;理论课堂里包含“三个环节”:个人汇报、小组活动和测试点评等;学习效果评判有“三个评价”:自学评价、参与评价和动手评价等。以有机化学实验中“环己烯的合成”为例,采用该新的教学模式开展了教学活动,整个教学过程不仅体现了“以学定教、学生为中心”的教学理念,而且也能发挥出线下传统课堂的优势,实现了将“知识内化”的时间拉长,达到对学生线上自学“知识传授”掌握度的有力检验的目的,更有时间和空间进行课程思政元素的挖掘与融入,完成在知识传播中实现对学生的价值引领。     

高中生“化学平衡”概念结构的研究

根据认知心理学关于概念结构的理论,对高中生“化学平衡”概念的自由分类进行多维标度和聚类分析,得出高中生的“化学平衡”概念由2个维度组成,学生的分类属于关联聚类,揭示了影响学生概念结构的因素,并对概念教学提出了建议。     

基于“虚拟化学实验室”的在线课堂深度学习*—以“价层电子对互斥模型(VSEPR)”在线教学设计为例

在线课堂作为一种远程教育方式,往往会导致学生缺乏学习社区感。面对抽象的理论性知识,学生易陷入一种“离身”的困境。基于此,借助虚拟化学实验室,设计一堂“身临其境”“做中学”的价层电子对互斥模型课,实现“抽象内容具身认知化”“在线学习互动现实化”的在线课堂深度学习。     

以“位构性”模型建构和学科能力发展的必修“原子结构 元素周期律”教学设计和实践*

在高中必修阶段“原子结构 元素周期律”主题已有研究的基础上,将“位构性”系统模型与学科能力活动任务相结合,提出了本研究的理论框架,进行了单元整体的教学设计并实施。通过预设学生的表现水平,设计各课时的评价任务,过程性地诊断学生在各个课时中“位构性”模型建构与学科能力的发展水平,描述学生在本章学习过程中的发展变化,促进了学生“证据推理与模型认知”等核心素养的发展。最后,归纳出以“位构性”模型建构和学科能力发展的“原子结构 元素周期律”在教学实践中的有效策略。以期能够对日后开展“原子结构 元素周期律”主题的教学设计与实践能够提供参考和建议。     

“电离与离子反应”的单元教学设计与实施*——食盐精制:从微观角度看粗盐中可溶性杂质的去除

在“食盐精制:从微观角度看粗盐中可溶性杂质的去除”的单元教学中,通过初识粗盐中的杂质、微观角度看氯化钠、微观角度看粗盐溶液、微观角度认识除杂方法、设计除杂方案并实施等活动,促进学生理解与应用电离、离子反应等核心概念,引领学生解决真实问题,形成解决除杂实验问题的基本思路,实现能力素养的发展。经过多轮次教学改进,结合教学实践及其教学效果抽提出“聚焦核心概念和学生必做实验,实现认识能力的进阶与实际问题解决过程高度融合”“通过学科实践及实验探究,建立宏观、微观、符号关联,突出证据推理,构建思维模型”“通过持续性评价活动,外显学生的前概念,促进概念转变,形成化学学科思维方式”等教学策略。     

模型素材差异对初中生“分子和原子”概念认知水平的影响

以“分子和原子”3堂同课异构课为载体,阐述了模型素材差异对学生概念认知水平的影响。通过控制变量法以及采用“前测问卷-课堂授课-课后测试-访谈问卷”的研究方法,得出以下结论:(1)教师采用教育的类比模型进行教学更有利于学生对“分子”“原子”概念的建构,采用图像和符号模型进行教学更有利于学生“从微观角度解释物理变化、化学变化”概念的建构。(2)从知识来看,使用图像和符号模型组织教学整体来说能帮助学生对“分子和原子”的概念建构到更高水平。从建模能力来看,使用图像与符号模型教学更能培养学生的图像识别与描述能力,使用教育的类比模型教学更能培养学生的动手能力和空间建模能力。(3)同时使用2种模型进行教学时学生对概念建构的程度最好,概念建构所达到的水平也更高。同时,研究对教材的编写、教师的教以及学生的学提出了一些建议。     

大学有机化学“五维度”教学新策略——以“芳烃的亲电取代和亲核取代反应”为例

介绍了大学有机化学“强理念、重思维、活课堂、共育人、乐钻研”五维度教学新策略的内涵与实践。以线下教学为主,腾讯会议和慕课为辅助,践行“有机化学是科学也是艺术”的教学理念;采用多循环“疑探式”教学方式,辨析亲电试剂和亲核试剂的多样性;注重培养学生多种科学思维的综合运用;强化“文献预习”“练习讲解”“综合作业”“师生互动”等多个教学环节,加深学生对知识的理解与应用,提升学生在课堂中的参与度,着重培养学生的科学思维和人文素养、自主学习与团队合作精神。     

Di­methyl­phenyl­sulfonium tri­fluoro­methane­sulfonate and methyl­di­phenyl­sulfonium tri­fluoro­methane­sulfonate

The bonding geometry of sulfur in the cations of the title compounds, C₈H₁₁S⁺·CF₃SO₃^? and C₁₃H₁₃S⁺·CF₃SO₃^?, respectively, is similar and is independent of the ratio of the Me/Ph substituents. As expected, in both cations, the S—Ph bonds are somewhat shorter than the S—Me bonds. In both crystal structures, the interaction between cations and anions is similar.     

Bis(μ‐hexa­methyl­enetetr­amine)­bis(aqua­di­bromo­cadmium)­di­aqua­di­bromo­cadmium dihydrate

The title compound, poly­[[di­aqua­di­bromo­cadmium‐μ‐(1,3,5,7‐tetra­aza­tri­cyclo[3.3.1.1^3,7]decane‐N¹:N⁵)‐aqua­cad­mium‐di‐μ‐bromo‐aqua­cadmium‐μ‐(1,3,5,7‐tetra­aza­tri­cyclo[3.3.1.1^3,7]decane‐N¹:N⁵)‐di‐μ‐bromo] dihydrate], [Cd₃­Br₆­(C₆­H₁₂­N₄)₂­(H₂O)₄]·­2H₂O, is made up of two‐dimensional neutral rectangular coordination layers. Each rectangular subunit is enclosed by a pair of Cd₃(μ₂‐Br)₆(H₂O)₃ fragments and a pair of (μ₂‐hmt)Cd(H₂O)₂Br₂(μ₂‐hmt) fragments as sides (hmt is hexa­methyl­enetetr­amine). The unique Cd^II atom in the Cd₂Br₂ ring in the Cd₃(μ₂‐Br)₆(H₂O)₃ fragment is in a slightly distorted octahedral CdNOBr₄ geometry, surrounded by one hmt ligand [2.433 (5) Å], one aqua ligand [2.273 (4) Å] and four Br atoms [2.6409 (11)–3.0270 (14) Å]. The Cd^II atom in the (μ₂‐hmt)Cd(H₂O)₂Br₂(μ₂‐hmt) fragment lies on an inversion center and is in a highly distorted octahedral CdN₂O₂Br₂ geometry, surrounded by two trans‐related N atoms of two hmt ligands [2.479 (5) Å], two trans‐related aqua ligands [2.294 (4) Å] and two trans‐related Br atoms [2.6755 (12) Å]. Adjacent two‐dimensional coordination sheets are connected into a three‐dimensional network by hydrogen bonds involving lattice water mol­ecules, and the aqua, bromo and hmt ligands belonging to different layers.     

Specific heat on Sr<Subscript>2</Subscript>Nb<Subscript>2</Subscript>O<Subscript>7</Subscript> and Sr<Subscript>2</Subscript>Ta<Subscript>2</Subscript>O<Subscript>7</Subscript>

Summary Specific heats on the single crystals of Sr₂Nb₂O₇, Sr₂Ta₂O₇ and (Sr_1-xBa_x)₂Nb₂O₇ were measured in a wide temperature range of 2-600 K. Heat anomalies of a λ-type were observed at the incommensurate phase transition of T_INC (=495 K) on Sr₂Nb₂O₇ and at the super-lattice phase transition of T_SL (=443 K) on Sr₂Ta₂O₇; the transition enthalpies and the transition entropies were estimated. Furthermore, a small heat anomaly was observed at the low temperature ferroelectric phase transition of T_LOW (=95 K) on Sr₂Nb₂O₇. The transition temperature T_LOW decreases with increasing Ba content x and it vanishes for samples of x>2%.     

Methyl­tri­phenyl­stibonium tetra­fluoro­borate

In the title compound, [Sb(CH₃)(C₆H₅)₃]BF₄, there are four independent cations and anions in the asymmetric unit. The geometry around the Sb atom is distorted tetrahedral, with Sb—C distances in the range 2.077 (4)–2.099 (10) Å and angles at the Sb atom in the range 103.3 (3)–119.0 (4)°.     

2,4,6‐Tri­chloro­phenyl­iso­nitrile and 2,4,6‐tri­chloro­benzo­nitrile

The molecular structures of the title compounds, 2,4,6‐tri­chloro­phenyl­iso­nitrile (IUPAC name: 2,4,6‐tri­chloro­phenyl isocyanide), C₇H₂Cl₃N, and 2,4,6‐tri­chloro­benzo­nitrile, C₇H₂Cl₃N, are normal. The two structures are not isomorphous, but do contain similar two‐dimensional layers in which pairs of mol­ecules are held together by pairs of Cl?CN [3.245 (3) Å] or Cl?NC [3.153 (2) Å] interactions. The two‐dimensional isomorphism is lost through different layer‐stacking modes.     

Tetra­phenyl­phos­phonium 4‐hydroxy‐2,2,6,6‐tetra­methyl­piperidinyl­oxy‐4‐sulfonate

The title compound, C₂₄H₂₀P⁺·C₉H₁₇NO₅S⁻, consists of an organic monovalent cation and an organic monovalent anion, the latter being derived from the TEMPO radical (TEMPO is 2,2,6,6‐tetra­methyl­piperidin‐1‐oxyl). Two inversion‐related anions interact via two –O—H⃛O—S– hydrogen bonds, forming a dimer in which there are no short contacts between the spin centres (–N—O) of the TEMPO(OH)SO₃⁻ anions. Furthermore, no significant magnetic interaction is observed between the dimers because the dimer is surrounded by cations. These results are consistent with the paramagnetic behaviour of the title salt.     

2,4‐Di­nitro­phenyl­hydrazones of 2,4‐di­hydroxy­benz­aldehyde, 2,4‐di­hydroxy­aceto­phenone and 2,4‐di­hydroxy­benzo­phenone

In 2,4‐di­hydroxy­benz­aldehyde 2,4‐di­nitro­phenyl­hydrazone N,N‐di­methyl­form­amide solvate {or 4‐[(2,4‐di­nitro­phenyl)­hydrazono­methyl]­benzene‐1,3‐diol N,N‐di­methyl­form­amide solvate}, C₁₃H₁₀N₄O₆·C₃H₇NO, (X), 2,4‐di­hydroxy­aceto­phenone 2,4‐di­nitro­phenyl­hydrazone N,N‐di­methyl­form­am­ide solvate (or 4‐{1‐[(2,4‐di­nitro­phenyl)hydrazono]ethyl}benzene‐1,3‐diol N,N‐di­methyl­form­amide solvate), C₁₄H₁₂N₄O₆·C₃H₇NO, (XI), and 2,4‐di­hydroxy­benzo­phenone 2,4‐di­nitro­phenyl­hydrazone N,N‐di­methyl­acet­amide solvate (or 4‐­{[(2,4‐di­nitro­phenyl)hydrazono]phenyl­methyl}benzene‐1,3‐diol N,N‐di­methyl­acet­amide solvate), C₁₉H₁₄N₄O₆·C₄H₉NO, (XII), the molecules all lack a center of symmetry, crystallize in centrosymmetric space groups and have been observed to exhibit non‐linear optical activity. In each case, the hydrazone skeleton is fairly planar, facilitated by the presence of two intramolecular hydrogen bonds and some partial N—N double‐bond character. Each molecule is hydrogen bonded to one solvent mol­ecule.     

9,10‐Di­phenyl‐9,10‐epi­dioxy­anthra­cene and 9,10‐di­hydro‐10,10‐di­methoxy‐9‐phenyl­anthracen‐9‐ol

9,10‐Di­phenyl‐9,10‐epi­dioxy­anthracene, C₂₆H₁₈O₂, (I), was accidentally used in a photo­oxy­genation reaction that produced 9,10‐di­hydro‐10,10‐di­methoxy‐9‐phenyl­anthracen‐9‐ol, C₂₂H₂₀O₃, (II). In both compounds, the phenyl rings are approximately orthogonal to the anthracene moiety. The conformation of the anthracene moiety differs as a result of substitution. Intramolecular C—H⃛O interactions in (I) form two approximately planar S(5) rings in each of the two crystallographically independent mol­ecules. The packing of (I) and (II) consists of molecular dimers stabilized by C—H⃛O interactions and of molecular chains stabilized by O—H⃛O interactions, respectively.     

{[(N‐Methyl‐p‐toluidino)­di­phenyl­phospho­ranyl­idene]­methyl}(N‐methyl‐p‐toluidino)­di­phenyl­phospho­nium iodide

The cationic part of the homodifunctional amino­phospho­ranyl ligand, C₄₁H₄₁N₂P₂⁺·I^?, shows interesting features associated with the N—P—C—P—N skeleton. The P—C(H) bond distances [1.696 (3) and 1.697 (3) Å] possess partial double‐bond characteristics. The nature of the P—C(H) and P—N bonds suggests that the positive charge is only distributed around the P—C—P atoms. The structure has near twofold symmetry through the central methyl­ide‐C atom.