共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
For x = (x 1, x 2, ..., x n ) ∈ ℝ+ n , the symmetric function ψ n (x, r) is defined by $\psi _n (x,r) = \psi _n \left( {x_1 ,x_2 , \cdots ,x_n ;r} \right) = \sum\limits_{1 \leqslant i_1 < i_2 \cdots < i_r \leqslant n} {\prod\limits_{j = 1}^r {\frac{{1 + x_{i_j } }}
{{x_{i_j } }}} } ,$\psi _n (x,r) = \psi _n \left( {x_1 ,x_2 , \cdots ,x_n ;r} \right) = \sum\limits_{1 \leqslant i_1 < i_2 \cdots < i_r \leqslant n} {\prod\limits_{j = 1}^r {\frac{{1 + x_{i_j } }}
{{x_{i_j } }}} } , 相似文献
2.
L. Losonczi 《Aequationes Mathematicae》1999,58(3):223-241
Summary. Let F, Y \Phi, \Psi be strictly monotonic continuous functions, F,G be positive functions on an interval I and let n ? \Bbb N \{1} n \in {\Bbb N} \setminus \{1\} . The functional equation¶¶F-1 ([(?i=1nF(xi)F(xi))/(?i=1n F(xi)]) Y-1 ([(?i=1nY(xi)G(xi))/(?i=1n G(xi))]) (x1,?,xn ? I) \Phi^{-1}\,\left({\sum\limits_{i=1}^{n}\Phi(x_{i})F(x_{i})\over\sum\limits_{i=1}^{n} F(x_{i}}\right) \Psi^{-1}\,\left({\sum\limits_{i=1}^{n}\Psi(x_{i})G(x_{i})\over\sum\limits_{i=1}^{n} G(x_{i})}\right)\,\,(x_{1},\ldots,x_{n} \in I) ¶was solved by Bajraktarevi' [3] for a fixed n 3 3 n\ge 3 . Assuming that the functions involved are twice differentiable he proved that the above functional equation holds if and only if¶¶Y(x) = [(aF(x) + b)/(cF(x) + d)], G(x) = kF(x)(cF(x) + d) \Psi(x) = {a\Phi(x)\,+\,b\over c\Phi(x)\,+\,d},\qquad G(x) = kF(x)(c\Phi(x) + d) ¶where a,b,c,d,k are arbitrary constants with k(c2+d2)(ad-bc) 1 0 k(c^2+d^2)(ad-bc)\ne 0 . Supposing the functional equation for all n = 2,3,... n = 2,3,\dots Aczél and Daróczy [2] obtained the same result without differentiability conditions.¶The case of fixed n = 2 is, as in many similar problems, much more difficult and allows considerably more solutions. Here we assume only that the same functional equation is satisfied for n = 2 and solve it under the supposition that the functions involved are six times differentiable. Our main tool is the deduction of a sixth order differential equation for the function j = F°Y-1 \varphi = \Phi\circ\Psi^{-1} . We get 32 new families of solutions. 相似文献
3.
M. A. Taylor 《Aequationes Mathematicae》2000,60(3):283-290
Summary. It is shown that provided F and G are injective in every argument, the functional equation of generalized m ×n m \times n bisymmetry (m,n 3 2) (m,n \ge 2) ,¶¶ G(F1(x11, \hdots , x1n),\hdots , Fm(xm1,\hdots, xmn)) G(F_1(x_{11}, \hdots , x_{1n}),\hdots , F_m(x_{m1},\hdots, x_{mn})) ¶ = F(G1(x11,\hdots , xm1),\hdots , Gn(x1n,\hdots , xmn)) = F(G_1(x_{11},\hdots , x_{m1}),\hdots , G_n(x_{1n},\hdots , x_{mn})) ¶may be reduced to ¶¶ G([`(F)]1(u11, \hdots , u1n),\hdots ,[`(F)]m(um1,\hdots, umn)) G(\overline{F}_1(u_{11}, \hdots , u_{1n}),\hdots , \overline{F}_m(u_{m1},\hdots, u_{mn})) ¶ = F([`(G)]1(u11,\hdots , um1),\hdots ,[`(G)]n(u1n,\hdots , umn)) = F(\overline{G}_1(u_{11},\hdots , u_{m1}),\hdots ,\overline{G}_n(u_{1n},\hdots , u_{mn})) ¶where¶¶ Fi(xi1,\hdots , xin) = [`(F)]i (ji1(xi1),\hdots , jin(xin)), Gj(x1j, \hdots , xmj) = [`(G)]j(j1j (x1j),\hdots, jmj(xmj)) F_i(x_{i1},\hdots , x_{in}) = \overline{F}_i (\varphi_{i1}(x_{i1}),\hdots , \varphi_{in}(x_{in})), G_j(x_{1j}, \hdots , x_{mj}) = \overline{G}_j(\varphi_{1j} (x_{1j}),\hdots, \varphi_{mj}(x_{mj})) ,¶¶jij < /FORMULA > are surjections and < FORMULA > \varphi_{ij} are surjections and \overline{F}_i, \overline{G}_j < /FORMULA > are injective in every argument for all < FORMULA > are injective in every argument for all 1\le i \le m,\ 1\le j\le n $. The result is also shown to hold for a wider class of functional equations. 相似文献
4.
H. Crauel 《Archiv der Mathematik》2000,75(6):472-480
Let x1,..., xn be points in the d-dimensional Euclidean space Ed with || xi-xj|| £ 1\| x_{i}-x_{j}\| \le 1 for all 1 \leqq i,j \leqq n1 \leqq i,j \leqq n, where || .||\| .\| denotes the Euclidean norm. We ask for the maximum M(d,n) of \mathop?i, j=1n|| xi-xj|| 2\textstyle\mathop\sum\limits _{i,\,j=1}^{n}\| x_{i}-x_{j}\| ^{2} (see [4]). This paper deals with the case d = 2. We calculate M(2, n) and show that the value M(2, n) is attained if and only if the points are distributed as evenly as possible among the vertices of a regular triangle of edge-length 1. Moreover we give an upper bound for the value \mathop?i, j=1n|| xi-xj|| \textstyle\mathop\sum\limits _{i,\,j=1}^{n}\| x_{i}-x_{j}\| , where the points x1,...,xn are chosen under the same constraints as above. 相似文献
5.
6.
Let K be a convex body in
\mathbbRn \mathbb{R}^n with volume |K| = 1 |K| = 1 . We choose N 3 n+1 N \geq n+1 points x1,?, xN x_1,\ldots, x_N independently and uniformly from K, and write C(x1,?, xN) C(x_1,\ldots, x_N) for their convex hull. Let
f : \mathbbR+ ? \mathbbR+ f : \mathbb{R^+} \rightarrow \mathbb{R^+} be a continuous strictly increasing function and 0 £ i £ n-1 0 \leq i \leq n-1 . Then, the quantity¶¶E (K, N, f °Wi) = òK ?òK f[Wi(C(x1, ?, xN))]dxN ?dx1 E (K, N, f \circ W_{i}) = \int\limits_{K} \ldots \int\limits_{K} f[W_{i}(C(x_1, \ldots, x_N))]dx_{N} \ldots dx_1 ¶¶is minimal if K is a ball (Wi is the i-th quermassintegral of a compact convex set). If f is convex and strictly increasing and 1 £ i £ n-1 1 \leq i \leq n-1 , then the ball is the only extremal body. These two facts generalize a result of H. Groemer on moments of the volume of C(x1,?, xN) C(x_1,\ldots, x_N) . 相似文献
7.
Let F ì PG \mathcal{F} \subset {\mathcal{P}_G} be a left-invariant lower family of subsets of a group G. A subset A ⊂ G is called F \mathcal{F} -thin if xA ?yA ? F xA \cap yA \in \mathcal{F} for any distinct elements x, y ∈ G. The family of all F \mathcal{F} -thin subsets of G is denoted by t( F ) \tau \left( \mathcal{F} \right) . If t( F ) = F \tau \left( \mathcal{F} \right) = \mathcal{F} , then F \mathcal{F} is called thin-complete. The thin-completion t*( F ) {\tau^*}\left( \mathcal{F} \right) of F \mathcal{F} is the smallest thin-complete subfamily of PG {\mathcal{P}_G} that contains F \mathcal{F} . Answering questions of Lutsenko and Protasov, we prove that a set A ⊂ G belongs to τ*(G) if and only if, for any sequence (g
n
)
n∈ω
of nonzero elements of G, there is n ∈ ω such that
?i0, ?, in ? { 0, 1 } g0i0 ?gninA ? F . \bigcap\limits_{{i_0}, \ldots, {i_n} \in \left\{ {0,\;1} \right\}} {g_0^{{i_0}} \ldots g_n^{{i_n}}A \in \mathcal{F}} . 相似文献
8.
Marco Bramanti Giovanni Cupini Ermanno Lanconelli Enrico Priola 《Mathematische Zeitschrift》2010,266(4):789-816
We consider a class of degenerate Ornstein–Uhlenbeck operators in ${\mathbb{R}^{N}}
|