共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 468 毫秒
1.
If P(z) is a polynomial of degree n which does not vanish in |z| 1,then it is recently proved by Rather [Jour.Ineq.Pure and Appl.Math.,9 (2008),Issue 4,Art.103] that for every γ 0 and every real or complex number α with |α|≥ 1,{∫02π |D α P(e iθ)| γ dθ}1/γ≤ n(|α| + 1)C γ{∫02π|P(eiθ)| γ dθ}1/γ,C γ ={1/2π∫0 2π|1+eiβ|γdβ}-1/γ,where D α P(z) denotes the polar derivative of P(z) with respect to α.In this paper we prove a result which not only provides a refinement of the above inequality but also gives a result of Aziz and Dawood [J.Approx.Theory,54 (1988),306-313] as a special case. 相似文献
2.
In this paper we prove the validity of the inequality $$\begin{array}{*{20}c} {\sup } \\ n \\ \end{array} \int_{ - \pi }^\pi {\left| {\frac{{f(0)}}{2} + \sum\nolimits_{k = 1}^n f \left( {\frac{{k\pi }}{n}} \right)e^{ikt} } \right|} dt \leqslant C\sum\nolimits_{m = 0}^\infty {\left| {\int_0^\pi {f(t)e^{imt} dt} } \right|}$$ for an arbitrary continuous function (C is an absolute constant). An inequality in the opposite sense was obtained by one of us earlier. 相似文献
3.
H. G. Ghazaryan V. N. Margaryan 《Journal of Contemporary Mathematical Analysis (Armenian Academy of Sciences)》2010,45(4):239-249
It is proved that if P(D) is a regular, almost hypoelliptic operator and
$
L_{2,\delta } = \left\{ {u:\left\| u \right\|_{2,\delta } = \left[ {\int {\left( {|u(x)|e^{ - \delta |x|} } \right)^2 dx} } \right]^{1/2} < \infty } \right\},\delta > 0,
$
L_{2,\delta } = \left\{ {u:\left\| u \right\|_{2,\delta } = \left[ {\int {\left( {|u(x)|e^{ - \delta |x|} } \right)^2 dx} } \right]^{1/2} < \infty } \right\},\delta > 0,
相似文献
4.
LetP(z) be a polynomial of degreen which does not vanish in the disk |z|<k. It has been proved that for eachp>0 andk≥1, $$\begin{gathered} \left\{ {\frac{1}{{2\pi }}\int_0^{2\pi } {\left| {P^{(s)} (e^{i\theta } )} \right|^p d\theta } } \right\}^{1/p} \leqslant n(n - 1) \cdots (n - s + 1) B_p \hfill \\ \times \left\{ {\frac{1}{{2\pi }}\int_0^{2\pi } {\left| {P(e^{i\theta } )} \right|^p d\theta } } \right\}^{1/p} , \hfill \\ \end{gathered} $$ where $B_p = \left\{ {\frac{1}{{2\pi }}\int_0^{2\pi } {\left| {k^s + e^{i\alpha } } \right|^p d\alpha } } \right\}^{ - 1/p} $ andP (s)(z) is thesth derivative ofP(z). This result generalizes well-known inequality due to De Bruijn. Asp→∞, it gives an inequality due to Govil and Rahman which as a special case gives a result conjectured by Erdös and first proved by Lax. 相似文献
5.
Qingfeng Sun 《Central European Journal of Mathematics》2011,9(2):328-337
Let λ(n) be the Liouville function. We find a nontrivial upper bound for the sum
|