共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 140 毫秒
1.
Laura Paladino 《Annali di Matematica Pura ed Applicata》2010,189(1):17-23
Let ${\mathcal{E}}Let E{\mathcal{E}} be an elliptic curve defined over
\mathbbQ{\mathbb{Q}} . Let
P ? E(\mathbb Q){P\in {\mathcal{E}}(\mathbb {Q})} and let q be a positive integer. Assume that for almost all valuations
v ? \mathbbQ{v\in \mathbb{Q}} , there exist points
Dv ? E(\mathbb Qv){D_v\in {\mathcal{E}}(\mathbb {Q}_v)} such that P = qD
v
. Is it possible to conclude that there exists a point
D ? E(\mathbb Q){D\in {\mathcal{E}}(\mathbb {Q})} such that P = qD? A full answer to this question is known when q is a power of almost all primes
p ? \mathbbN{p\in \mathbb{N}} , but some cases remain open when p ? S={2,3,5,7,11,13,17,19,37,43,67,163}{p\in S=\{2,3,5,7,11,13,17,19,37,43,67,163\}} . We now give a complete answer in the case when q = 4. 相似文献
2.
Milo? S. Kurili? 《Order》2012,29(1):119-129
A family P ì [w]w{\mathcal P} \subset [\omega]^\omega is called positive iff it is the union of some infinite upper set in the Boolean algebra P(ω)/Fin. For example, if I ì P(w){\mathcal I} \subset P(\omega) is an ideal containing the ideal Fin of finite subsets of ω, then P(w) \IP(\omega) \setminus {\mathcal I} is a positive family and the set
Dense(\mathbb Q)\mbox{Dense}({\mathbb Q}) of dense subsets of the rational line is a positive family which is not the complement of some ideal on
P(\mathbb Q)P({\mathbb Q}). We prove that, for a positive family P{\mathcal P}, the order types of maximal chains in the complete lattice áP è{?}, ì ?\langle {\mathcal P} \cup \{\emptyset\}, \subset \rangle are exactly the order types of compact nowhere dense subsets of the real line having the minimum non-isolated. Also we compare
this result with the corresponding results concerning maximal chains in the Boolean algebras P(ω) and
Intalg[0,1)\mathbb R\mbox{Intalg}[0,1)_{{\mathbb R}} and the poset
E(\mathbb Q)E({\mathbb Q}), where
E(\mathbb Q)E({\mathbb Q}) is the set of elementary submodels of the rational line. 相似文献
3.
Wolfgang M. Ruppert 《Archiv der Mathematik》1999,72(4):278-281
We give an elementary argument for the well known fact that the endomorphism algebra
End(A)?\Bbb Q {\rm {End}}(A)\otimes {\Bbb Q } of a simple complex abelian surface A can neither be an imaginary quadratic field nor a definite quaternion algebra. Another consequence of our argument is that a two-dimensional complex torus T with
\Bbb Q (?d)\hookrightarrow End\Bbb Q (T){\Bbb Q }(\sqrt {d})\hookrightarrow {\rm{End_{{\Bbb Q }}}}(T) where
\Bbb Q (?d){\Bbb Q }(\sqrt {d}) is real quadratic, is algebraic. 相似文献
4.
Hideyo Sasaki 《The Ramanujan Journal》2009,18(1):73-80
Let
be a real quadratic field over Q with m a square-free positive rational integer and
be the integer ring in F. A totally positive definite integral n-ary quadratic form f=f(x
1,…,x
n
)=∑1≤i,j≤n
α
ij
x
i
x
j
(
) is called universal if f represents all totally positive integers in
. Chan, Kim and Raghavan proved that ternary universal forms over F exist if and only if m=2,3,5 and determined all such forms. There exists no ternary universal form over real quadratic fields whose discriminants
are greater than 12.
In this paper we prove that there are only two quaternary universal forms (up to equivalence) over
. For the proof of universality we apply the theory of quadratic lattices.
相似文献
5.
S. B. Damelin F. J. Hickernell D. L. Ragozin X. Zeng 《Journal of Fourier Analysis and Applications》2010,16(6):813-839
Given $\mathcal{X}Given X\mathcal{X}, some measurable subset of Euclidean space, one sometimes wants to construct a finite set of points, P ì X\mathcal{P}\subset\mathcal {X}, called a design, with a small energy or discrepancy. Here it is shown that these two measures of design quality are equivalent
when they are defined via positive definite kernels
K:X2(=X×X)?\mathbbRK:\mathcal{X}^{2}(=\mathcal{X}\times\mathcal {X})\to\mathbb{R}. The error of approximating the integral òXf(x) dm(x)\int_{\mathcal{X}}f(\boldsymbol{x})\,\mathrm{d}\mu(\boldsymbol{x}) by the sample average of f over P\mathcal{P} has a tight upper bound in terms of the energy or discrepancy of P\mathcal{P}. The tightness of this error bound follows by requiring f to lie in the Hilbert space with reproducing kernel K. The theory presented here provides an interpretation of the best design for numerical integration as one with minimum energy,
provided that the measure μ defining the integration problem is the equilibrium measure or charge distribution corresponding to the energy kernel, K. 相似文献
6.
Daniela Roşu 《NoDEA : Nonlinear Differential Equations and Applications》2010,17(4):479-496
In this paper we consider a nonlinear evolution reaction–diffusion system governed by multi-valued perturbations of m-dissipative operators, generators of nonlinear semigroups of contractions. Let X and Y be real Banach spaces, ${\mathcal{K}}In this paper we consider a nonlinear evolution reaction–diffusion system governed by multi-valued perturbations of m-dissipative operators, generators of nonlinear semigroups of contractions. Let X and Y be real Banach spaces, K{\mathcal{K}} be a nonempty and locally closed subset in
\mathbbR ×X×Y, A:D(A) í X\rightsquigarrow X, B:D(B) í Y\rightsquigarrow Y{\mathbb{R} \times X\times Y,\, A:D(A)\subseteq X\rightsquigarrow X, B:D(B)\subseteq Y\rightsquigarrow Y} two m-dissipative operators, F:K ? X{F:\mathcal{K} \rightarrow X} a continuous function and
G:K \rightsquigarrow Y{G:\mathcal{K} \rightsquigarrow Y} a nonempty, convex and closed valued, strongly-weakly upper semi-continuous (u.s.c.) multi-function. We prove a necessary
and a sufficient condition in order that for each (t,x,h) ? K{(\tau,\xi,\eta)\in \mathcal{K}}, the next system
{ lc u¢(t) ? Au(t)+F(t,u(t),v(t)) t 3 tv¢(t) ? Bv(t)+G(t,u(t),v(t)) t 3 tu(t)=x, v(t)=h, \left\{ \begin{array}{lc} u'(t)\in Au(t)+F(t,u(t),v(t))\quad t\geq\tau \\ v'(t)\in Bv(t)+G(t,u(t),v(t))\quad t\geq\tau \\ u(\tau)=\xi,\quad v(\tau)=\eta, \end{array} \right. 相似文献
7.
Let L\cal{L} be a positive definite bilinear functional, then the Uvarov transformation of L\cal{L} is given by U(p,q) = L(p,q) + m p(a)[`(q)](a-1) +[`(m)] p([`(a)]-1)\,\mathcal{U}(p,q) = \mathcal{L}(p,q) + m\,p(\alpha)\overline{q}(\alpha^{-1}) + \overline{m}\,p(\overline{\alpha}^{-1})
[`(q)]([`(a)])\overline{q}(\overline{\alpha}) where $|\alpha| > 1, m \in \mathbb{C}$|\alpha| > 1, m \in \mathbb{C}. In this paper we analyze conditions on m for U\cal{U} to be positive definite in the linear space of polynomials of degree less than or equal to n. In particular, we show that m has to lie inside a circle in the complex plane defined by α, n and the moments associated with L\cal{L}. We also give an upper bound for the radius of this circle that depends only on α and n. This and other conditions on m are visualized for some examples. 相似文献
8.
In this paper, we mainly study polynomial generalized Vekua-type equation _boxclose)w=0{p(\mathcal{D})w=0} and polynomial generalized Bers–Vekua equation p(D)w=0{p(\mathcal{\underline{D}})w=0} defined in
W ì \mathbbRn+1{\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^{n+1}} where D{\mathcal{D}} and D{\mathcal{\underline{D}}} mean generalized Vekua-type operator and generalized Bers–Vekua operator, respectively. Using Clifford algebra, we obtain
the Fischer-type decomposition theorems for the solutions to these equations including
(D-l)kw=0,(D-l)kw=0(k ? \mathbbN){\left(\mathcal{D}-\lambda\right)^{k}w=0,\left(\mathcal {\underline{D}}-\lambda\right)^{k}w=0\left(k\in\mathbb{N}\right)} with complex parameter λ as special cases, which derive the Almansi-type decomposition theorems for iterated generalized
Bers–Vekua equation and polynomial generalized Cauchy–Riemann equation defined in
W ì \mathbbRn+1{\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^{n+1}}. Making use of the decomposition theorems we give the solutions to polynomial generalized Bers–Vekua equation defined in
W ì \mathbbRn+1{\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^{n+1}} under some conditions. Furthermore we discuss inhomogeneous polynomial generalized Bers–Vekua equation p(D)w=v{p(\mathcal{\underline{D}})w=v} defined in
W ì \mathbbRn+1{\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^{n+1}}, and develop the structure of the solutions to inhomogeneous polynomial generalized Bers–Vekua equation p(D)w=v{p(\mathcal{\underline{D}})w=v} defined in
W ì \mathbbRn+1{\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^{n+1}}. 相似文献
9.
Let ${\mathcal{P}_{d,n}}
|