An explicit formula for |FM(1+1+n)|

We show that the number of elements in FM(1+1+n), the modular lattice freely generated by two single elements and an n-element chain, is 1 $$\frac{1}{{6\sqrt 2 }}\sum\limits_{k = 0}^{n + 1} {\left[ {2\left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {2k} \\ k \\ \end{array} } \right) - \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {2k} \\ {k - 2} \\ \end{array} } \right)} \right]} \left( {\lambda _1^{n - k + 2} - \lambda _2^{n - k + 2} } \right) - 2$$ , where \(\lambda _{1,2} = {{\left( {4 \pm 3\sqrt 2 } \right)} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\left( {4 \pm 3\sqrt 2 } \right)} 2}} \right. \kern-0em} 2}\) .     

On a relationship in the theory of Fourier series

In this paper we prove the validity of the inequality $$\begin{array}{*{20}c} {\sup } \\ n \\ \end{array} \int_{ - \pi }^\pi {\left| {\frac{{f(0)}}{2} + \sum\nolimits_{k = 1}^n f \left( {\frac{{k\pi }}{n}} \right)e^{ikt} } \right|} dt \leqslant C\sum\nolimits_{m = 0}^\infty {\left| {\int_0^\pi {f(t)e^{imt} dt} } \right|}$$ for an arbitrary continuous function (C is an absolute constant). An inequality in the opposite sense was obtained by one of us earlier.     

Some approximation theorems for modified Bernstein-Durrmeyer operators

The modified Bernstein-Durrmeyer operators discussed in this paper are given byM_nf≡M_n(f,x)=(n+2)P_(n,k)∫_0~1p_n+1.k(t)f(t)dt,whereWe will show,for 0<α<1 and 1≤p≤∞     

Optimal rate of integration and ɛ-entropy of a class of analytic functions

The author considers a class F of analytic functions real in the interval [-1, 1] and bounded in the unit circle. As an estimate of the optimal quadrature error R(n) over the class F it is shown that $$_e - \left( {2\sqrt 2 + \frac{1}{{\sqrt 2 }}} \right)\pi \sqrt n \leqslant R(n) \leqslant e^{ - \frac{\pi }{{\sqrt 2 }}n} .$$ With the additional condition that \(\mathop {max}\limits_{x \in [ - 1,1]}\) ¦f(x)¦?B, an estimate is obtained for the ?-entropy H_?(F): $$\frac{8}{{27}}\frac{{(1n2)^2 }}{{\pi ^2 }} \leqslant \mathop {\lim }\limits_{\varepsilon \to 0} \frac{{H_\varepsilon (F)}}{{\left( {\log \frac{1}{\varepsilon }} \right)^3 }} \leqslant \frac{2}{{\pi ^2 }}(1n2)^2 .$$      

Lipschitz-Nikolski\imath constants and asymptotic simultaneous approximation on theM n -operatorsconstants and asymptotic simultaneous approximation on theM n -operators

This note is a study of approximation of classes of functions and asymptotic simultaneous approximation of functions by theM _n -operators of Meyer-König and Zeller which are defined by $$(M_n f)(x) = (1 - x)^{n + 1} \sum\limits_{k = 0}^\infty {f\left( {\frac{k}{{n + k}}} \right)} \left( \begin{array}{l} n + k \\ k \\ \end{array} \right)x^k , n = 1,2,....$$ Among other results it is proved that for 0<α≤1 $$\mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } n^{\alpha /2} \mathop {\sup }\limits_{f \in Lip_1 \alpha } \left| {(M_n f)(x) - f(x)} \right| = \frac{{\Gamma \left( {\frac{{\alpha + 1}}{2}} \right)}}{{\pi ^{1/2} }}\left\{ {2x(1 - x)^2 } \right\}^{\alpha /2} $$ and if for a functionf, the derivativeD ^m+2 f exist at a pointx∈(0, 1), then $$\mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } 2n[D^m (M_n f) - D^m f] = \Omega f,$$ where Ω is the linear differential operator given by $$\Omega = x(1 - x)^2 D^{m + 2} + m(3x - 1)(x - 1)D^{m + 1} + m(m - 1)(3x - 2)D^m + m(m - 1)(m - 2)D^{m - 1} .$$      

THE BEST APPROXIMATION CONSTANT FOR THE JACKSON''''S TYPE OPERATOR J_(n,3) (f;x)

In this paper we obtain the best approximation constant of function f(x)(∈C_(2π))by theJackson's type operator J_(π3)(f;x),i.e.‖J_(n,3)(f,x)-f(x)‖_c≤(4-6/π)ω(f,1/n),‖J_(n,3)(f,x)-f(x)‖_c≤(8-17/π)ω_2(f,1/n)     

Fourier coefficients of Siegel cusp forms of genus n

Let F(Z) be a cusp form of integral weight k relative to the Siegel modular group Sp_n(Z) and let f(N) be its Fourier coefficient with index N. Making use of Rankin's convolution, one proves the estimate (1) $$f(\mathcal{N}) = O(\left| \mathcal{N} \right|^{\tfrac{k}{2} - \tfrac{1}{2}\delta (n)} ),$$ where $$\delta (n) = \frac{{n + 1}}{{\left( {n + 1} \right)\left( {2n + \tfrac{{1 + ( - 1)^n }}{2}} \right) + 1}}.$$ Previously, for n ≥ 2 one has known Raghavan's estimate $$f(\mathcal{N}) = O(\left| \mathcal{N} \right|^{\tfrac{k}{2}} )$$ In the case n=2, Kitaoka has obtained a result, sharper than (1), namely: (2) $$f(\mathcal{N}) = O(\left| \mathcal{N} \right|^{\tfrac{k}{2} - \tfrac{1}{4} + \varepsilon } ).$$ At the end of the paper one investigates specially the case n=2. It is shown that in some cases the result (2) can be improved to, apparently, unimprovable estimates if one assumes some analogues of the Petersson conjecture. These results lead to a conjecture regarding the optimal estimates of f(N), n=2.     

On the order of the error function of the square-full integers

LetL(x) denote the number of square full integers ≤x. By a square-full integer, we mean a positive integer all of whose prime factors have multiplicity at least two. It is well known that $$\left. {L(x)} \right| \sim \frac{{\zeta ({3 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {3 2}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 2})}}{{\zeta (3)}}x^{{1 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {1 2}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 2}} + \frac{{\zeta ({2 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {2 3}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 3})}}{{\zeta (2)}}x^{{1 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {1 3}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 3}} ,$$ where ζ(s) denotes the Riemann Zeta function. Let Δ(x) denote the error function in the asymptotic formula forL(x). On the basis of the Riemann hypothesis (R.H.), it is known that \(\Delta (x) = O(x^{\tfrac{{13}}{{81}} + \varepsilon } )\) for every ε>0. In this paper, we prove the following results on the assumption of R.H.: (1) $$\frac{1}{x}\int\limits_1^x {\Delta (t)dt} = O(x^{\tfrac{1}{{12}} + \varepsilon } ),$$ (2) $$\int\limits_1^x {\frac{{\Delta (t)}}{t}\log } ^{v - 1} \left( {\frac{x}{t}} \right) = O(x^{\tfrac{1}{{12}} + \varepsilon } )$$ for any integer ν≥1. In fact, we prove some general results and deduce the above from them. On the basis of (1) and (2) above, we conjecture that \(\Delta (x) = O(x^{{1 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {1 {12}}} \right. \kern-0em} {12}} + \varepsilon } )\) under the assumption of R.H.     

On the divergence of de la Vallée Poussin means of Fourier series

Пусть {λ _{n 1} ^t8 — монотонн ая последовательнос ть натуральных чисел. Дл я каждой функции fεL(0, 2π) с рядом Фурье строятся обобщенные средние Bалле Пуссена $$V_n^{(\lambda )} (f;x) = \frac{{a_0 }}{2} + \mathop \sum \limits_{k = 1}^n (a_k \cos kx + b_k \sin kx) + \mathop \sum \limits_{k = n + 1}^{n + \lambda _n } \left( {1 - \frac{{k - n}}{{\lambda _n + 1}}} \right)\left( {a_k \cos kx + b_k \sin kx} \right).$$ Доказываются следую щие теоремы.

1. Если λ_n=o(n), то существуе т функция fεL(0, 2π), для кот орой последовательность {V_n ^(λ)(?;x)} расходится почти вс юду.
2. Если λ_n=o(n), то существуе т функция fεL(0, 2π), для кот орой последовательность $$\left\{ {\frac{1}{\pi }\mathop \smallint \limits_{ - \pi /\lambda _n }^{\pi /\lambda _n } f(x + t)\frac{{\sin (n + \tfrac{1}{2})t}}{{2\sin \tfrac{1}{2}t}}dt} \right\}$$ расходится почти всю ду

.     

On the strong summation of Fourier series with variable exponents

Пустьf 2π-периодическ ая суммируемая функц ия, as _k (x) еë сумма Фурье порядк аk. В связи с известным ре зультатом Зигмунда о сильной суммируемости мы уст анавливаем, что если λn→∞, то сущес твует такая функцияf, что почти всюду $$\mathop {\lim \sup }\limits_{n \to \infty } \left\{ {\frac{1}{n}\mathop \sum \limits_{k = n + 1}^{2n} |s_k (x) - f(x)|^{\lambda _{2n} } } \right\}^{1/\lambda _{2n} } = \infty .$$ Отсюда, в частности, вы текает, что если λn?∞, т о существует такая фун кцияf, что почти всюду $$\mathop {\lim \sup }\limits_{n \to \infty } \left\{ {\frac{1}{n}\mathop \sum \limits_{k = 0}^n |s_k (x) - f(x)|^{\lambda _k } } \right\}^{1/\lambda _n } = \infty .$$ Пусть, далее, ω-модуль н епрерывности и $$H^\omega = \{ f:\parallel f(x + h) - f(x)\parallel _c \leqq K_f \omega (h)\} .$$ . Мы доказываем, что есл и λ _n ?∞, то необходимым и достаточным условие м для того, чтобы для всехf∈H ^ω выполнялос ь соотношение $$\mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } \left\{ {\frac{1}{n}\mathop \sum \limits_{k = n + 1}^{2n} |s_k (x) - f(x)|^{\lambda _n } } \right\}^{1/\lambda _n } = 0(x \in [0;2\pi ])$$ является условие $$\omega \left( {\frac{1}{n}} \right) = o\left( {\frac{1}{{\log n}} + \frac{1}{{\lambda _n }}} \right).$$ Это же условие необхо димо и достаточно для того, чтобы выполнялось соотнош ение $$\mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } \frac{1}{{n + 1}}\mathop \sum \limits_{k = 0}^n |s_k (x) - f(x)|^{\lambda _k } = 0(f \in H^\omega ,x \in [0;2\pi ]).$$      

On a system of second order differential equations with periodic impulse coefficients

A thorough investigation of the systemd~2y(x):dx~2 p(x)y(x)=0with periodic impulse coefficientsp(x)={1,0≤xx_0>0) -η, x_0≤x<2π(η>0)p(x)=p(x 2π),-∞相似文献   

Approximation of the function sign x in the uniform and integral metrics by means of rational functions

Estimates are obtained for the nonsymmetric deviations R_n [sign x] and R_n [sign x]_L of the function sign x from rational functions of degree ≤n, respectively, in the metric $$c([ - 1, - \delta ] \cup [\delta ,1]), 0< \delta< exp( - \alpha \surd \overline n ), \alpha > 0,$$ and in the metric L[?1, 1]: $$\begin{gathered} R_n [sign x] _{\frown }^\smile exp \{ - \pi ^2 n/(2 ln 1/\delta )\} , n \to \infty , \hfill \\ 10^{ - 3} n^{ - 2} \exp ( - 2\pi \surd \overline n )< R_n [sign x_{|L}< \exp ( - \pi \surd \overline {n/2} + 150). \hfill \\ \end{gathered} $$ Let 0 < δ < 1, Δ (δ)=[?1, ? δ] ∪ [δ, 1]; $$\begin{gathered} R_n [f;\Delta (\delta )] = R_n [f] = inf max |f(x) - R(x)|, \hfill \\ R_n [f;[ - 1,1] ]_L = R_n [f]_L = \mathop {inf}\limits_{R(x)} \smallint _{ - 1}^1 |f(x) - R(x)|dx, \hfill \\ \end{gathered} $$ where R(x) is a rational function of order at most n. Bulanov [1] proved that for δ ε [e^?n, e^?1] the inequality $$\exp \left( {\frac{{\pi ^2 n}}{{2\ln (1/\delta }}} \right) \leqslant R_n [sign x] \leqslant 30 exp\left( {\frac{{\pi ^2 n}}{{2\ln (1/\delta + 4 ln ln (e/\delta ) + 4}}} \right)$$ is valid. The lower estimate in this inequality was previously obtained by Gonchar ([2], cf. also [1]).     

On the convergence rate of the partial sums of positive entire Dirichlet series

Пусть Λ=(λ_n) — возрастаю щая к+∞ последователь ность неотрицательных чис ел, λ₀=0, а S₊(Λ) — класс абсолют но сходящихся в С рядо в Дирихле вида $$F\left( z \right) = \mathop \sum \limits_{k = 0}^\infty a_k \exp \left\{ {z\lambda _k } \right\},$$ где a₀=1 и a_k>0 (k∈N). Положим $$\begin{gathered} S_n \left( z \right) = \mathop \sum \limits_{k = 1}^\infty a_k \exp \left\{ {z\lambda _k } \right\}, \hfill \\ \sigma _n \left( F \right) = \max \left\{ {\frac{1}{{S_n \left( x \right)}} - \frac{1}{{F\left( x \right)}}:x \in R} \right\}. \hfill \\ \end{gathered} $$ Доказано, что для того, чтобы для любой функц ии F∈S₊(Λ) выполнялось равенст во $$\mathop {\lim \sup }\limits_{n \to \infty } \frac{1}{{\ln n}}\ln \frac{1}{{\sigma _n \left( F \right)}} = + \infty ,$$ необходимо и достато чно, чтобы $$\mathop \sum \limits_{n = 1}^\infty \frac{1}{{n\lambda _n }}< + \infty .$$ Аналогичные результ ы получены для различ ных подклассов классаS ₊ (Λ), определяемых условиями на убывани е коэффициентова _n.     

On the strong approximation by the (C, α)-means of Fourier series. II

стАтьь ьВльЕтсь пРОД ОлжЕНИЕМ пРЕДыДУЩЕИ ОДНОИМЕННОИ РАБОты АВтОРА, гДЕ ИжУ ЧАлсь пОРьДОк ВЕлИЧИН пРИ УслОВИьх, ЧтО α>-1/2, Рα >- 1 И ЧтО МАтРИцАt _nk УДОВлЕтВОРьЕт НЕкОт ОРОМУ УслОВИУ РЕгУльРНОстИ. жДЕсь ДОкАжыВАЕтсь, Ч тО ЕслИf∈H ^Ω, тО ВыпОлНь Етсь ОцЕНкА $$\left\{ {\frac{1}{{\lambda _n }}\mathop \Sigma \limits_{k = n - \lambda _n + 1}^n \left| {\sigma _k^\alpha \left( x \right) - f\left( x \right)} \right|^p } \right\}^{{1 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {1 p}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} p}} = O\left( {\left\{ {\frac{1}{{\lambda _n }}\mathop \Sigma \limits_{k = n - \lambda _n + 1}^n \left( {\frac{1}{k}\mathop \smallint \limits_{{1 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {1 k}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} k}}^{2\pi } \frac{{\omega \left( t \right)}}{{t^2 }}dt} \right)^p } \right\}^{{1 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {1 p}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} p}} + \left( {\frac{{\lambda _n }}{n}} \right)^\alpha \omega \left( {\frac{1}{n}} \right)} \right)$$ (λ₁=1, λ_n+1-λ_n≦1), А тАкжЕ ЧтО Ёт А ОцЕНкА ОкОНЧАтЕльН А В сВОИх тЕРМИНАх; пОДОБ НыИ РЕжУль-тАт спРАВЕДлИВ тАкжЕ И Дль сОпРьжЕННОИ ФУНкцИИ . ДОкАжыВАЕтсь, ЧтО Усл ОВИьα>?1/2 Иpα>?1, кОтОРыЕ Б ылИ НАлОжЕНы В УпОМьНУтО И ВышЕ ЧАстИ I, сУЩЕстВЕН Ны.     

Mean value of weyl sums

We give a simple proof of a mean value theorem of I. M. Vinogradov in the following form. Suppose P, n, k, τ are integers, P≥1, n≥2, k≥n (τ+1), τ≥0. Put $$J_{k,n} (P) = \int_0^1 \cdots \int_0^1 {\left| {\sum\nolimits_{x = 1}^P {e^{2\pi i(a_1 x + \cdots + a_n x^n )} } } \right|^{2k} da_1 \ldots da_n .} $$ Then $$J_{k,n} \leqslant n!k^{2n\tau } n^{\sigma n^2 u} \cdot 2^{2n^2 \tau } P^{2k - \Delta } ,$$ where $$\begin{gathered} u = u_\tau = min(n + 1,\tau ), \hfill \\ \Delta = \Delta _\tau = n(n + 1)/2 - (1 - 1/n)^{\tau + 1} n^2 /2. \hfill \\ \end{gathered} $$      

The Euler-Maclaurin formula for functions with singularities

Asymptotic formulas of the Euler-Maclaurin type are proved for the sum $$\frac{1}{n}\sum\limits_{k = 1}^{n - 1} {\Phi \left( {\tfrac{k}{n}} \right) as n \to \infty .} $$ Here Φ(χ) is a sufficiently smooth function on the interval (0,1) and has singularities at the end points χ=0 and χ=1.     

Strong approximation of Riesz means at critical index on Hp(T) (0<p≤1)

This paper is a continuation of [3]. Suppose f∈H^p(T), 0σ _r ^σ f,σ=1/p?1. When p=1, it is just the partial Fourier sums S_kf. In this paper we establish the sharp estimations on the degree of approximation: $$\left\{ { - \frac{1}{{logR}}\int\limits_1^R {\left\| {\sigma _r^\delta f - f} \right\|_{H^p (T)}^p \frac{{dr}}{r}} } \right\}^{1/p} \leqq C{\mathbf{ }}{}_p\omega \left( {f,{\mathbf{ }}( - \frac{1}{{logR}})^{1/p} } \right)_{H^p (T)} ,0< p< 1,$$ and \(\frac{1}{{\log L}}\sum\limits_{k - 1}^L {\frac{{\left\| {S_k f - f} \right\|_H 1_{(T)} }}{k} \leqq Cp\omega (f; - \frac{1}{{\log L}})_H 1_{(T)} } \) Where $$\omega (f,{\mathbf{ }}h)_{H^p (T)} \begin{array}{*{20}c} { = Sup} \\ {0 \leqq \left| u \right| \leqq h} \\ \end{array} \left\| {f( \cdot + u) - f( \cdot )} \right\|_{H^p (T).} $$ .     

Sharp weak-type inequalities for Hilbert transform and Riesz projection

The paper is devoted to the study of the weak norms of the classical operators in the vector-valued setting.

1. Let S, H denote the singular integral involution operator and the Hilbert transform on $L^p \left( {\mathbb{T}, \ell _\mathbb{C}^2 } \right)$ , respectively. Then for 1 ≤ p ≤ 2 and any f, $$\left\| {\mathcal{S}f} \right\|_{p,\infty } \leqslant \left( {\frac{1} {\pi }\int_{ - \infty }^\infty {\frac{{\left| {\tfrac{2} {\pi }\log \left| t \right|} \right|^p }} {{t^2 + 1}}dt} } \right)^{ - 1/p} \left\| f \right\|p,$$ $$\left\| {\mathcal{H}f} \right\|_{p,\infty } \leqslant \left( {\frac{1} {\pi }\int_{ - \infty }^\infty {\frac{{\left| {\tfrac{2} {\pi }\log \left| t \right|} \right|^p }} {{t^2 + 1}}dt} } \right)^{ - 1/p} \left\| f \right\|p.$$ Both inequalities are sharp.
2. Let P ₊ and P _? stand for the Riesz projection and the co-analytic projection on $L^p \left( {\mathbb{T}, \ell _\mathbb{C}^2 } \right)$ , respectively. Then for 1 ≤ p ≤ 2 and any f, $$\left\| {P + f} \right\|_{p,\infty } \leqslant \left\| f \right\|_p ,$$ $$\left\| {P - f} \right\|_{p,\infty } \leqslant \left\| f \right\|_p .$$ Both inequalities are sharp.
3. We establish the sharp versions of the estimates above in the nonperiodic case.

The results are new even if the operators act on complex-valued functions. The proof rests on the construction of an appropriate plurisubharmonic function and probabilistic techniques.     

On some new identities for the Fibonomial coefficients

Let F _n be the nth Fibonacci number. The Fibonomial coefficients \(\left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} n \\ k \\ \end{array} } \right]_F\) are defined for n ≥ k > 0 as follows $$\left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} n \\ k \\ \end{array} } \right]_F = \frac{{F_n F_{n - 1} \cdots F_{n - k + 1} }} {{F_1 F_2 \cdots F_k }},$$ with \(\left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} n \\ 0 \\ \end{array} } \right]_F = 1\) and \(\left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} n \\ k \\ \end{array} } \right]_F = 0\) . In this paper, we shall provide several identities among Fibonomial coefficients. In particular, we prove that $$\sum\limits_{j = 0}^{4l + 1} {\operatorname{sgn} (2l - j)\left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {4l + 1} \\ j \\ \end{array} } \right]_F F_{n - j} = \frac{{F_{2l - 1} }} {{F_{4l + 1} }}\left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {4l + 1} \\ {2l} \\ \end{array} } \right]_F F_{n - 4l - 1} ,}$$ holds for all non-negative integers n and l.