Synthesis and Characterization of Intramolecularly Stabilized Chiral Dimethylindium Alkoxides and their Use as Cross Coupling Reagents

The enantiomerically pure dimeric N, O‐5‐chelates [Me₂In(μ‐OCH₂CH(R)NMe₂)]₂ {R = Me (S) ( 2 ); R = ⁱPr (S) ( 3 ); R = ⁱBu (S) ( 4 ); R = Bz (S) ( 5 )}, and [Me₂In‐{μ‐(1R, 2S)‐OCH(Ph)CH(Me)NMe₂}]₂ ( 6 ), as well as the achiral dimeric N, O‐6‐chelate [Me₂In(μ‐O(CH₂)₃NMe₂)]₂ ( 7 ) have been synthesized from trimethylindium and equimolar amounts of the corresponding enantiomerically pure dimethylamino alcohols or of the achiral dimethylaminopropanol by elimination of methane. Their ¹H NMR, ¹³C NMR, and mass spectra as well as the X‐ray single crystal structure analyses of [Me₂In{μ‐O(CH₂)₂NMe₂}]₂ ( 1 ), 3, 5, 6 and 7 are described and discussed. The coordinative N→In bonds of the five‐coordinate indium complexes show dynamic dissociation/association processes. 1—6 were found to be useful reagents for the partial kinetic resolution of 2‐carbomethoxy‐1, 1′‐binaphthyl triflate.     

Gemischte Sandwichkomplexe der 4 f‐Elemente: Enantiomerenreine Cyclooctatetraenyl‐Cyclopentadienyl‐Komplexe des Samariums und Lutetiums mit donorfunktionalisierten Cyclopentadienylliganden

Organometallic Compounds of the Lanthanides. 139 Mixed Sandwich Complexes of the 4 f Elements: Enantiomerically Pure Cyclooctatetraenyl Cyclopentadienyl Complexes of Samarium and Lutetium with Donor‐Functionalized Cyclopentadienyl Ligands The reactions of [K{(S)‐C₅H₄CH₂CH(Me)OMe}], [K{(S)‐C₅H₄CH₂CH(Me)NMe₂}] and [K{(S)‐C₅H₄CH(Ph)CH₂NMe₂}] with the cyclooctatetraenyl lanthanide chlorides [(η⁸‐C₈H₈)Ln(μ‐Cl)(THF)]₂ (Ln = Sm, Lu) yield the mixed cyclooctatetraenyl cyclopentadienyl lanthanide complexes [(η⁸‐C₈H₈)Sm{(S)‐η⁵ : η¹‐C₅H₄CH₂CH(Me)OMe}] ( 1 a ), [(η⁸‐C₈H₈)Ln{(S)‐η⁵ : η¹‐C₅H₄CH₂CH(Me)NMe₂}] (Ln = Sm ( 2 a ), Lu ( 2 b )) and [(η⁸‐C₈H₈)Ln{(S)‐η⁵ : η¹‐C₅H₄CH(Ph)CH₂NMe₂}] (Ln = Sm ( 3 a ), Lu ( 3 b )). For comparison, the achiral compounds [(η⁸‐C₈H₈)Ln{η⁵ : η¹‐C₅H₄CH₂CH₂NMe₂}] (Ln = Sm ( 4 a ), Lu ( 4 b )) are synthesized in an analogous manner. ¹H‐, ¹³C‐NMR‐, and mass spectra of all new compounds as well as the X‐ray crystal structures of 3 b and 4 b are discussed.     

Hydrophilic Quaternary Ammonium‐Group‐Containing [FeFe]‐Hydrogenase Models: Synthesis,Structures, and Electrocatalytic Hydrogen Production

The first quaternary ammonium‐group‐containing [FeFe]‐hydrogenase models [(μ‐PDT)Fe₂(CO)₄{κ²‐(Ph₂P)₂N(CH₂)₂NMe₂BzBr}] ( 2 ; PDT=propanedithiolate) and [(μ‐PDT)Fe₂(CO)₄{μ‐(Ph₂P)₂N(CH₂)₂NMe₂BzBr}] ( 4 ) have been prepared by the quaternization of their precursors [(μ‐PDT)Fe₂(CO)₄{κ²‐(Ph₂P)₂N(CH₂)₂NMe₂}] ( 1 ) and [(μ‐PDT)Fe₂(CO)₄{μ‐(Ph₂P)₂N(CH₂)₂NMe₂}] ( 3 ) with benzyl bromide in high yields. Although new complexes 1 – 4 have been fully characterized by spectroscopic and X‐ray crystallographic studies, the chelated complexes 1 and 2 converted into their bridged isomers 3 and 4 at higher temperatures, thus demonstrating that these bridged isomers are thermodynamically favorable. An electrochemical study on hydrophilic models 2 and 4 in MeCN and MeCN/H₂O as solvents indicates that the reduction potentials are shifted to less‐negative potentials as the water content increases. This outcome implies that both 2 and 4 are more easily reduced in the mixed MeCN/H₂O solvent than in MeCN. In addition, hydrophilic models 2 and 4 act as electrocatalysts and achieve higher i_cat/i_p values and turnover numbers (TONs) in MeCN/H₂O as a solvent than in MeCN for the production of hydrogen from the weak acid HOAc.     

Rare‐Earth‐Metal Alkylaluminates Supported by N‐Donor‐Functionalized Cyclopentadienyl Ligands: C?H Bond Activation and Performance in Isoprene Polymerization

Homoleptic tetramethylaluminate complexes [Ln(AlMe₄)₃] (Ln=La, Nd, Y) reacted with HCp^NMe2 (Cp^NMe2=1‐[2‐(N,N‐dimethylamino)‐ethyl]‐2,3,4,5‐tetramethyl‐cyclopentadienyl) in pentane at ?35 °C to yield half‐sandwich rare‐earth‐metal complexes, [{C₅Me₄CH₂CH₂NMe₂(AlMe₃)}Ln(AlMe₄)₂]. Removal of the N‐donor‐coordinated trimethylaluminum group through donor displacement by using an equimolar amount of Et₂O at ambient temperature only generated the methylene‐bridged complexes [{C₅Me₄CH₂CH₂NMe(μ‐CH₂)AlMe₃}Ln(AlMe₄)] with the larger rare‐earth‐metal ions lanthanum and neodymium. X‐ray diffraction analysis revealed the formation of isostructural complexes and the C? H bond activation of one aminomethyl group. The formation of Ln(μ‐CH₂)Al moieties was further corroborated by ¹³C and ¹H‐¹³C HSQC NMR spectroscopy. In the case of the largest metal center, lanthanum, this C? H bond activation could be suppressed at ?35 °C, thereby leading to the isolation of [(Cp^NMe2)La(AlMe₄)₂], which contains an intramolecularly coordinated amino group. The protonolysis reaction of [Ln(AlMe₄)₃] (Ln=La, Nd) with the anilinyl‐substituted cyclopentadiene HCp^AMe2 (Cp^AMe2=1‐[1‐(N,N‐dimethylanilinyl)]‐2,3,4,5‐tetramethylcyclopentadienyl) at ?35 °C generated the half‐sandwich complexes [(Cp^AMe2)Ln(AlMe₄)₂]. Heating these complexes at 75 °C resulted in the C? H bond activation of one of the anilinium methyl groups and the formation of [{C₅Me₄C₆H₄NMe(μ‐CH₂)AlMe₃}Ln(AlMe₄)] through the elimination of methane. In contrast, the smaller yttrium metal center already gave the aminomethyl‐activated complex at ?35 °C, which is isostructural to those of lanthanum and neodymium. The performance of complexes [{C₅Me₄CH₂CH₂NMe(μ‐CH₂)AlMe₃}‐ Ln(AlMe₄)], [(Cp^AMe2)Ln(AlMe₄)₂], and [{C₅Me₄C₆H₄NMe(μ‐CH₂)AlMe₃}Ln(AlMe₄)] in the polymerization of isoprene was investigated upon activation with [Ph₃C][B(C₆F₅)₄], [PhNMe₂H][B(C₆F₅)₄], and B(C₆F₅)₃. The highest stereoselectivities were observed with the lanthanum‐based pre‐catalysts, thereby producing polyisoprene with trans‐1,4 contents of up to 95.6 %. Narrow molecular‐weight distributions (M_w/M_n<1.1) and complete consumption of the monomer suggested a living‐polymerization mechanism.     

Ligand‐Modification Effects on the Reactivity,Solubility, and Stability of Organometallic Tantalum Complexes in Water

Tantalum complexes [TaCp*Me{κ⁴‐C,N,O,O‐(OCH₂)(OCHC(CH₂NMe₂)?CH)py}] ( 4 ) and [TaCp*Me{κ⁴‐C,N,O,O‐(OCH₂)(OCHC(CH₂NH₂)?CH)py}] ( 5 ), which contain modified alkoxide pincer ligands, were synthesized from the reactions of [TaCp*Me{κ³‐N,O,O‐(OCH₂)(OCH)py}] (Cp*=η⁵‐C₅Me₅) with HC?CCH₂NMe₂ and HC?CCH₂NH₂, respectively. The reactions of [TaCp*Me{κ⁴‐C,N,O,O‐(OCH₂)(OCHC(Ph)?CH)py}] ( 2 ) and [TaCp*Me{κ⁴‐C,N,O,O‐(OCH₂)(OCHC(SiMe₃)?CH)py}] ( 3 ) with triflic acid (1:2 molar ratio) rendered the corresponding bis‐triflate derivatives [TaCp*(OTf)₂{κ³‐N,O,O‐(OCH₂)(OCHC(Ph)?CH₂)py}] ( 6 ) and [TaCp*(OTf)₂{κ³‐N,O,O‐(OCH₂)(OCHC(SiMe₃)?CH₂)py}] ( 7 ), respectively. Complex 4 reacted with triflic acid in a 1:2 molar ratio to selectively yield the water‐soluble cationic complex [TaCp*(OTf){κ⁴‐C,N,O,O‐(OCH₂)(OCHC(CH₂NHMe₂)?CH)py}]OTf ( 8 ). Compound 8 reacted with water to afford the hydrolyzed complex [TaCp*(OH)(H₂O){κ³‐N,O,O‐(OCH₂)(OCHC(CH₂NHMe₂)?CH₂)py}](OTf)₂ ( 9 ). Protonation of compound 8 with triflic acid gave the new tantalum compound [TaCp*(OTf){κ⁴‐C,N,O,O‐(OCH₂)(HOCHC(CH₂NHMe₂)?CH)py}](OTf)₂ ( 10 ), which afforded the corresponding protonolysis derivative [TaCp*(OTf)₂{κ³‐N,O,O‐(OCH₂)(HOCHC(CH₂NHMe₂)?CH₂)py}](OTf) ( 11 ) in solution. Complex 8 reacted with CNtBu and potassium 2‐isocyanoacetate to give the corresponding iminoacyl derivatives 12 and 13 , respectively. The molecular structures of complexes 5 , 7 , and 10 were established by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction studies.     

Unterscheidung enantiotoper/diastereotoper Protonen und regioselektive Spinentkopplung in metallorganischen Komplexen mit Hilfe von Shiftreagenzien

Dimethylphosphonate HP(O)(OCH₃)₂ and the dimethylphosphonate complexes [(C₅H₅)MX{P(O) (OCH₃)₂}{P(OCH₃)₃}] (M=Co, Rh; X=I, CH₃), [(C₅H₅)Co{P(O)(OCH₃)₂}₂ {P(OH)(OCH₃)₂}] and [(C₅H₅)Ni{P(O)(OCH₃)₂}{P(OCH₃)₃}] have been studied by ¹H n.m.r. spectroscopy. The chiral shift reagent Eu(tfc)₃ has been used to resolve the spectra of the enantiomeric mixtures of [(C₅H₅)MX {P(O)(OCH₃)₂}{P(OCH₃)₃}]. The substituent X in [(C₅H₅)MX{P(O)(OCH₃)₂}{P(OCH₃)₃}] has a strong influence on the anischrony of the diastereotopic phosphonate methyls in the presence of Eu(tfc)₃. The same shift reagent also resolves the enantiotopic protons in HP(O)(OCH₃)₂ but not in [(C₅H₅)Ni {P(O)(OCH₃)₂}{P(OCH₃)₃}]. The addition of Eu(tfc)₃ to [(C₅H₅)Ni{P(O)(OCH₃)₂}{P(OCH₃)₃}] eliminates the ³J(POCH) coupling in the coordinated dimethylphosphonate. The cobalt complex [(C₅H₅)Co{P(O)(OCH₃)₂}₂{P(OH)(OCH₃)₂}] reacts as a chelating ligand with Eu(tfc)₃ to give one tfcH per Eu(tfc)₃.     

CH Bond Activation during and after the Reactions of a Metallacyclic Amide with Silanes: Formation of a μ‐Alkylidene Hydride Complex,Its H–D Exchange,and β‐H Abstraction by a Hydride Ligand

Metallacyclic complex [(Me₂N)₃Ta(η²‐CH₂SiMe₂NSiMe₃)] ( 3 ) undergoes C?H activation in its reaction with H₃SiPh to afford a Ta/μ‐alkylidene/hydride complex, [(Me₂N)₂{(Me₃Si)₂N}Ta(μ‐H)₂(μ‐C‐η²‐CHSiMe₂NSiMe₃)Ta(NMe₂)₂] ( 4 ). Deuterium‐labeling studies with [D₃]SiPh show H–D exchange between the Ta?D ?Ta unit and all methyl groups in [(Me₂N)₂{(Me₃Si)₂N}Ta(μ‐D)₂(μ‐C‐η²‐CHSiMe₂NSiMe₃)Ta(NMe₂)₂] ([D₂]‐ 4 ) to give the partially deuterated complex [D_n]‐ 4 . In addition, 4 undergoes β‐H abstraction between a hydride and an NMe₂ ligand and forms a new complex [(Me₂N){(Me₃Si)₂N}Ta(μ‐H)(μ‐N‐η²‐C,N‐CH₂NMe)(μ‐C‐η²‐C,N‐CHSiMe₂NSiMe₃)Ta(NMe₂)₂] ( 5 ) with a cyclometalated, η²‐imine ligand. These results indicate that there are two simultaneous processes in [D_n]‐ 4 : 1) H–D exchange through σ‐bond metathesis, and 2) H?D elimination through β‐H abstraction (to give [D_n]‐ 5 ). Both 4 and 5 have been characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction studies.     

Heterobi‐ and ‐trimetallic Ion Pairs of Zirconocene‐Based Isoselective Olefin Polymerization Catalysts with AlMe3

The reactivity towards AlMe₃ of discrete cationic ansa‐zirconocenes 2 a,b that are ubiquitously used in isoselective propylene polymerization and based on [{Ph(H)C(3,6‐tBu₂‐Flu)(3‐tBu‐5‐Et‐Cp)}ZrMe₂)] {Cp‐Flu} and rac‐[{Me₂Si‐(2‐Me‐4‐Ph‐Ind)₂}ZrMe₂] {SBI} was scrutinized. The first example of a structurally characterized Group 4 metallocene AlMe₃ adduct ( 3 b ) is reported. In the presence of excess AlMe₃, the {SBI}‐based AlMe₃ adduct 3 b undergoes a slow decomposition via C? H activation in a bridging methyl unit to yield a new species ( 4 b ) with a trimetallic {Zr(μ‐CH₂)(μ‐Me)AlMe(μ‐Me)AlMe₂} core. EXSY NMR data for the process 2 b ? 3 b → 4 b suggest very rapid and reversible binding of an additional AlMe₃ molecule onto AlMe₃ adduct 3 b . The resulting heterotrimetallic species intermediates exchange of methyl groups between different metal centers and slowly undergoes the C? H activation reaction towards 4 b .     

Formation and Reactivity of an Aluminabenzene Ligand at Pentadienyl‐Supported Rare‐Earth Metals

The half‐open rare‐earth‐metal aluminabenzene complexes [(1‐Me‐3,5‐tBu₂‐C₅H₃Al)(μ‐Me)Ln(2,4‐dtbp)] (Ln=Y, Lu) are accessible via a salt metathesis reaction employing Ln(AlMe₄)₃ and K(2,4‐dtbp). Treatment of the yttrium complex with B(C₆F₅)₃ and tBuCCH gives access to the pentafluorophenylalane complex [{1‐(C₆F₅)‐3,5‐tBu₂‐C₅H₃Al}{μ‐C₆F₅}Y{2,4‐dtbp}] and the mixed vinyl acetylide complex [(2,4‐dtbp)Y(μ‐η¹:η³‐2,4‐tBu₂‐C₅H₄)(μ‐CCtBu)AlMe₂], respectively.     

Reactivity of Yttrium Carboxylates Toward Alkylaluminum Hydrides

Yttrocene‐carboxylate complex [Cp*₂Y(OOCAr^Me)] (Cp*=C₅Me₅, Ar^Me=C₆H₂Me₃‐2,4,6) was synthesized as a spectroscopically versatile model system for investigating the reactivity of alkylaluminum hydrides towards rare‐earth‐metal carboxylates. Equimolar reactions with bis‐neosilylaluminum hydride and dimethylaluminum hydride gave adduct complexes of the general formula [Cp*₂Y(μ‐OOCAr^Me)(μ‐H)AlR₂] (R=CH₂SiMe₃, Me). The use of an excess of the respective aluminum hydride led to the formation of product mixtures, from which the yttrium‐aluminum‐hydride complex [{Cp*₂Y(μ‐H)AlMe₂(μ‐H)AlMe₂(μ‐CH₃)}₂] could be isolated, which features a 12‐membered‐ring structure. The adduct complexes [Cp*₂Y(μ‐OOCAr^Me)(μ‐H)AlR₂] display identical ¹J(Y,H) coupling constants of 24.5 Hz for the bridging hydrido ligands and similar ⁸⁹Y NMR shifts of δ=?88.1 ppm (R=CH₂SiMe₃) and δ=?86.3 ppm (R=Me) in the ⁸⁹Y DEPT45 NMR experiments.     

Yttrium Siloxide Complexes Bearing Terminal Methyl Ligands: Molecular Models for Ln−CH3 Terminated Silica Surfaces

Surface organometallic chemistry (SOMC) on silica materials is a prominent approach for the generation of highly active heterogenized polymerization catalysts. Despite advanced methods of characterization, the elucidation of the catalytically active surface species remains a challenging task. Alkylated rare‐earth metal siloxide complexes can be regarded as molecular models of respective covalently bonded alkylated surface species, primarily used for 1,3‐diene polymerization. Here, we performed both salt metathesis reactions of [Y(MMe₄)₃] (M = Al, Ga) with [K{OSi(OtBu)₃}] and alkylation reactions of [Y{OSi(OtBu)₃}₃]₂ with AlMe₃. The obtained complexes [Y(CH₃)[(AlMe₂){OSi(OtBu)₃}₂](AlMe₄)]₂, [Y(CH₃)[(AlMe₂){OSi(OtBu)₃}₂]‐{OSi(OtBu)₃}], [Y{OSi(OtBu)₃}₃(μ‐Me)Y(μ‐Me)₂Y{OSi(OtBu)₃}₂(AlMe₄)], and [Y(CH₃)(GaMe₄){OSi(OtBu)₃}]₂ represent rare examples of organoyttrium species with terminal methyl groups. The formation and purity of the mixed methyl/siloxy yttrium complexes could be enhanced by treating [Y(MMe₄)₃] with [K(MMe₂){OSi(OtBu)₃}₂]_n (M=Al: n=2; M=Ga: n=∞). Complexes [K(MMe₂){OSi(OtBu)₃}₂]_n were obtained by addition of [K{OSi(OtBu)₃}] to [Me₂M{OSi(OtBu)₃}]₂. Deeper insight into the fluxional behavior of the mixed methyl/siloxy yttrium complexes in solution was gained by ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectroscopic studies at variable temperature and ¹H–⁸⁹Y HSQC NMR spectroscopy.     

Synthese,Struktur und Reaktivität von η3‐1,2‐Diphosphaallylkomplexen sowie von [{(η5‐C5H5)(CO)2W–Co(CO)3}{μ‐AsCH(SiMe3)2}(μ‐CO)]

Syntheses, Structure and Reactivity of η³‐1,2‐Diphosphaallyl Complexes and [{(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂W–Co(CO)₃}{μ‐AsCH(SiMe₃)₂}(μ‐CO)] Reaction of ClP=C(SiMe₂iPr)₂ ( 3 ) with Na[Mo(CO)₃(η⁵‐C₅H₅)] afforded the phosphavinylidene complex [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂Mo=P=C(SiMe₂iPr)₂] ( 4 ) which in situ was converted into the η¹‐1,2‐diphosphaallyl complex [η⁵‐(C₅H₅)(CO)₂Mo{η³‐tBuPPC(SiMe₂iPr)₂] ( 6 ) by treatment with the phosphaalkene tBuP=C(NMe₂)₂. The chloroarsanyl complexes [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₃M–As(Cl)CH(SiMe₃)₂] [where M = Mo ( 9 ); M = W ( 10 )] resulted from the reaction of Na[M(CO)₃(η⁵‐C₅H₅)] (M = Mo, W) with Cl₂AsCH(SiMe₃)₂. The tungsten derivative 10 and Na[Co(CO)₄] underwent reaction to give the dinuclear μ‐arsinidene complex [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂W–Co(CO)₃{μ‐AsCH(SiMe₃)₂}(μ‐CO)] ( 11 ). Treatment of [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂Mo{η³‐tBuPPC(SiMe₃)₂}] ( 1 ) with an equimolar amount of ethereal HBF₄ gave rise to a 85/15 mixture of the saline complexes [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂Mo{η²‐tBu(H)P–P(F)CH(SiMe₃)₂}]BF₄ ( 18 ) and [Cp(CO)₂Mo{F₂PCH(SiMe₃)₂}(tBuPH₂)]BF₄ ( 19 ) by HF‐addition to the PC bond of the η³‐diphosphaallyl ligand and subsequent protonation ( 18 ) and/or scission of the PP bond by the acid ( 19 ). Consistently 19 was the sole product when 1 was allowed to react with an excess of ethereal HBF₄. The products 6 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 18 and 19 were characterized by means of spectroscopy (IR, ¹H‐, ¹³C{¹H}‐, ³¹P{¹H}‐NMR, MS). Moreover, the molecular structures of 6 , 11 and 18 were determined by X‐ray diffraction analysis.     

Reaction of CO2 with a Vanadium(II) Aryl Oxide: Synergistic Activation of CO2/Oxo Groups towards H‐Atom Radical Abstraction

Treatment of divalent (ONNO)V(TMEDA) ( 1 ; ONNO=[2,4‐Me₂‐2‐(OH)C₆H₂CH₂]₂N(CH₂)₂NMe₂) with CO₂ afforded [(ONNO)V]₂(μ‐OH)(μ‐formate) ( 2 ). Whereas the bridging hydroxo and formate groups both originated from CO₂, the H atoms present on the two residues were obtained through H‐atom radical abstraction from the solvent. DFT calculations revealed an initially linear CO₂ bonding mode, followed by deoxygenation, and highlighted a synergistic effect between the so‐formed oxo group and an additional bridging CO₂ residue in promoting radical behavior.     

Palladium(II) and Platinum(II) Complexes with Bisphosphanes, [S2C=C(CN)2]2– and [Se2C=C(CN)2]2– as Chelating Ligands

The palladium(II) and platin(II) 1, 1‐dicyanoethylene‐2, 2‐dithiolates [(L–L)M{S₂C=C(CN)₂}] (M = Pd: L–L = dppm, dppe, dcpe, dpmb; M = Pt: dppe, dcpe, dpmb) were prepared either from[(L–L)MCl₂] and K₂[S₂C=C(CN)₂] or from [(PPh₃)₂M{S₂C=C(CN)₂}] and the bisphosphane. Moreover, [(dppe)Pt{S₂C=C(CN)₂}]was obtained from [(1, 5‐C₈H₁₂)Pt{S₂C=C(CN)₂}] and dppeby ligand exchange. The 1, 1‐dicyanoethylene‐2, 2‐diselenolates[(dppe)M{Se₂C=C(CN)₂}] (M = Pd, Pt) were prepared from[(dppe)MCl₂] and K₂[Se₂C=C(CN)₂]. The oxidation potentials of the square‐planar palladium and platinum complexes were determined by cyclic voltammetry. The reaction of [(dcpe)Pd(S₂C=O)] with TCNE led to a ligand fragment exchange and gave the 1, 1‐dicyanoethylene‐2, 2‐dithiolate [(dcpe)Pd{S₂C=C(CN)₂}] in good yield.     

Neue Kupferkomplexe mit Phosphaalkenliganden. Molekülstruktur von [Cu{P(Mes*)C(NMe2)2}2]BF4 (Mes* = 2,4,6‐tBu3C6H2)

New Copper Complexes Containing Phosphaalkene Ligands. Molecular Structure of [Cu{P(Mes*)C(NMe₂)₂}₂]BF₄ (Mes* = 2,4,6‐tBu₃C₆H₂) Reaction of equimolar amounts of the inversely polarized phosphaalkene tBuP=C(NMe₂)₂ ( 1a ) and copper(I) bromide or copper(I) iodide, respectively, affords complexes [Cu₃X₃{μ‐P(tBu)C(NMe₂)₂}₃] ( 2 ) (X =Br) and ( 3 ) (X = I) as the formal result of the cyclotrimerization of a 1:1‐adduct. Treatment of 1a with [Cu(L)Cl] (L = PiPr₃; SbiPr₃) leads to the formation of compounds [CuCl(L){P(tBu)C(NMe₂)₂}] ( 4a ) (L = PiPr₃) and ( 4b ) (L = SbiPr₃), respectively. Reaction of [(MeCN)₄Cu]BF₄ with two equivalents of PhP=C(NMe₂)₂ ( 1b ) yields complex [Cu{P(Ph)C(NMe₂)₂}₂]BF₄ ( 5b ). Similarly, compounds [Cu{P(Aryl)C(NMe₂)₂}₂]BF₄ ( 5c (Aryl = Mes and 5d (Aryl = Mes*)) are obtained from ArylP=C(NMe₂)₂ ( 1c : Aryl = Mes; 1d : Mes*) and [(MeCN)₄Cu]BF₄ in the presence of SbiPr₃. Complexes 2 , 3 , 4a , 4b , and 5b‐5d are characterized by means of elemental analyses and spectroscopy (¹H‐, ¹³C{¹H}‐, ³¹P{¹H}‐NMR). The molecular structure of 5d is determined by X‐ray diffraction analysis.     

Synthese,Röntgenstrukturanalyse und Multikern‐NMR‐spektroskopische Untersuchung einiger intramolekular stickstoffstabilisierter Bor‐, Aluminium‐ und Galliumorganyle

Synthesis, X‐Ray Structure, and Multinuclear NMR Investigation of some intramolecularly Nitrogen stabilized Organoboron, ‐aluminum, and ‐gallium Compounds The intramolecularly nitrogen stabilized organoaluminum‐ and organoboron compounds Me₂Al(CH₂)₃NMe₂ ( 1 ), Me₂AlC₁₀H₆‐8‐NMe₂ ( 2 ), ⁱPr₂Al(CH₂)₃NEt₂ ( 3 ), (CH₂)₅Al(CH₂)₃NMe₂ ( 4 ), and (CH₂)₅B(CH₂)₃NMe₂ ( 5 ) are synthesized from Me₂AlCl and the corresponding organolithium compounds and from AlCl₃ or BCl₃, the lithium alkyl and ⁱPrMgCl or BrMg(CH₂)₅MgBr, respectively. AlCl₃ and GaCl₃ react with Li(CH₂)₃NMe₂ or LiCH₂CHMeCH₂NMe₂ forming Cl₂AlCH₂CHMeCH₂NMe₂ ( 6 ), Cl₂Al(CH₂)₃NMe₂ ( 8 ), and Cl₂Ga(CH₂)₃NMe₂ ( 9 ). The reaction of 6 and of 8 or 9 with BrMg(CH₂)₅MgBr and BrMg(CH₂)₆MgBr, respectively, yields (CH₂)₅AlCH₂CHMeCH₂NMe₂ ( 7 ), (CH₂)₆Al(CH₂)₃NMe₂ ( 10 ), and (CH₂)₆Ga(CH₂)₃NMe₂ ( 11 ). MeAlCl₂, made by the redistribution reaction of AlCl₃ with Me₂AlCl, reacts with 2 equivalents of Li(CH₂)₃NMe₂ yielding MeAl[(CH₂)₃NMe₂]₂ ( 12 ) and with MeN[(CH₂)₃MgCl]₂ under formation of MeAl[(CH₂)₃]₂NMe ( 13 ). MeAlCl₂, MeGaCl₂, or GaCl₃ accordingly react with one equivalent of organolithium reagent to give the intramolecularly nitrogen stabilized organoaluminum and organogallium chlorides MeClAl(CH₂)₃NMe₂ ( 14 ), MeClGa(CH₂)₃NMe₂ ( 15 ), MeClGaC₆H₄‐2‐CH₂NMe₂ ( 16 ) as well as Cl₂GaC₆H₄‐2‐CHMeNMe₂ ( 17 ). The compounds were characterized by elemental analyses, mass spectroscopy, ¹H, ¹¹B, ¹³C and ²⁷Al NMR investigations. Single crystal X‐ray structure analyses of 1 , 2 , 4 , 5 and 17 reveal the monomeric molecular structures with intramolecular nitrogen coordination.     

Gallium Methylene

Despite the eminent importance of metal alkylidene species for organic synthesis and industrial catalytic processes, molecular homoleptic metal methylene compounds [M(CH₂)_n] as the simplest representatives, have remained elusive. Reports on this topic date back to 1955 when polymeric [Li₂(CH₂)]_n and [Mg(CH₂)]_n were accessed by pyrolysis of methyllithium and dimethylmagnesium, respectively. However, the insoluble salt‐like composition of these compounds has impeded their application as valuable reagents. We report that rare‐earth metallocene methyl complexes [(C₅Me₅)₂Ln{(μ‐Me)₂GaMe₂}] (Ln=Lu, Y) trigger the formation of homoleptic gallium methylene [Ga₈(μ‐CH₂)₁₂] from trimethylgallium [GaMe₃] (Me=methyl) via a cascade C?H bond activation involving the dodecametallic clusters [(C₅Me₅)₆Ln₃(μ₃‐CH₂)₆Ga₉(μ‐CH₂)₉] as crucial intermediates. Such gallium methylene compounds feature a reversible [Ga₈(μ‐CH₂)₁₂]/[Ga₆(μ‐CH₂)₉] oligomer switch in donor solvents and act as Schrock‐type methylene‐transfer reagents.     

Intramolecularly Coordinated Gallium Sulfides: Suitable Single Source Precursors for GaS Thin Films

Our studies have been focused on the synthesis of N→Ga coordinated organogallium sulfides [L¹Ga(μ‐S)]₃ ( 1 ) and [L²Ga(μ‐S)]₂ ( 2 ) containing either N,C,N‐ or C,N‐chelating ligands L¹ or L² (L¹ is {2,6‐(Me₂NCH₂)₂C₆H₃}^? and L² is {2‐(Et₂NCH₂)‐4,6‐tBu₂‐C₆H₂}^?). As the result of the different ligands, compounds 1 and 2 differ mutually in their structure. To change the Ga/S ratio, unusually N→Ga coordinated organogallium tetrasulfide L¹Ga(κ²‐S₄) ( 3 ) was prepared and the unprecedented complex [{2‐[CH{(CH₂)₃CH₃}(μ‐OH)]‐6‐CH₂NMe₂}C₆H₃]GaS ( 4 ) was also isolated as the minor by‐product of the reaction. Compounds 1 – 3 were further studied as potential single‐source precursors for amorphous GaS thin film deposition by spin‐coating.     

Hydrido(hydrosilylene)tungsten Complexes: Dynamic Behavior and Reactivity Toward Acetone

Reaction of a labile tungsten nitrile complex, [(Cp*)W(CO)₂(NCMe)Me] (Cp*=η⁵‐C₅Me₅), with H₃SiC(SiMe₃)₃ gave the hydrido(hydrosilylene) complex [(Cp*)(CO)₂(H)W?Si(H){C(SiMe₃)₃}] ( 1a ). The hydrido(silylene) complex [(η⁵‐C₅Me₄Et)(CO)₂(H)W?SiMes₂] ( 2 ) (Mes=2,4,6‐Me‐C₆H₂) was synthesized by a similar reaction with H₂SiMes₂. There is a strong interligand interaction between the hydrido and silylene ligands of these complexes; this was confirmed by a neutron diffraction study of [D₂] 1b , that is, the deuterido and η⁵‐C₅Me₄Et derivative of 1a . The exchange between the W? H and the Si? D groups was observed in the deuterido complex [D] 1a . This H/D exchange proceeded slowly at room temperature, but very rapidly under UV irradiation. Variable‐temperature NMR spectroscopy measurements show the dynamic behavior of carbonyl ligands in 1a . Complex 1a reacted with acetone at room temperature to give mainly a hydrosilylation product, [(Cp*)(CO)₂(H)W?Si(OiPr){C(SiMe₃)₃}] ( 3a ), along with a siloxy complex, [(Cp*)(CO)₂WO(Si(H)iPr{C(SiMe₃)₃})] ( 4a ). At low temperature, a different reaction, namely, α‐H abstraction, proceeded to give an equilibrium mixture of 1a and a dihydrido(silyl) complex, [(Cp*)(CO)₂(H)₂W(Si(H){OC(?CH₂)Me}{C(SiMe₃)₃})] ( 5 ).     

Stabilization of a Silaaldehyde by its η2 Coordination to Tungsten

Treatment of pyridine‐stabilized silylene complexes [(η⁵‐C₅Me₄R)(CO)₂(H)W?SiH(py)(Tsi)] (R=Me, Et; py=pyridine; Tsi=C(SiMe₃)₃) with an N‐heterocyclic carbene ^MeIⁱPr (1,3‐diisopropyl‐4,5‐dimethylimidazol‐2‐ylidene) caused deprotonation to afford anionic silylene complexes [(η⁵‐C₅Me₄R)(CO)₂W?SiH(Tsi)][H^MeIⁱPr] (R=Me ( 1‐Me ); R=Et ( 1‐Et )). Subsequent oxidation of 1‐Me and 1‐Et with pyridine‐N‐oxide (1 equiv) gave anionic η²‐silaaldehydetungsten complexes [(η⁵‐C₅Me₄R)(CO)₂W{η²‐O?SiH(Tsi)}][H^MeIⁱPr] (R=Me ( 2‐Me ); R=Et ( 2‐Et )). The formation of an unprecedented W‐Si‐O three‐membered ring was confirmed by X‐ray crystal structure analysis.