Subcompactness and domain representability in GO-spaces on sets of real numbers

In this paper we explore a family of strong completeness properties in GO-spaces defined on sets of real numbers with the usual linear ordering. We show that if τ is any GO-topology on the real line R, then (R,τ) is subcompact, and so is any Gδ-subspace of (R,τ). We also show that if (X,τ) is a subcompact GO-space constructed on a subset X⊆R, then X is a Gδ-subset of any space (R,σ) where σ is any GO-topology on R with τ=σX_|. It follows that, for GO-spaces constructed on sets of real numbers, subcompactness is hereditary to Gδ-subsets. In addition, it follows that if (X,τ) is a subcompact GO-space constructed on any set of real numbers and if τS is the topology obtained from τ by isolating all points of a set S⊆X, then (X,τS) is also subcompact. Whether these two assertions hold for arbitrary subcompact spaces is not known.We use our results on subcompactness to begin the study of other strong completeness properties in GO-spaces constructed on subsets of R. For example, examples show that there are subcompact GO-spaces constructed on subsets X⊆R where X is not a Gδ-subset of the usual real line. However, if (X,τ) is a dense-in-itself GO-space constructed on some X⊆R and if (X,τ) is subcompact (or more generally domain-representable), then (X,τ) contains a dense subspace Y that is a Gδ-subspace of the usual real line. It follows that (Y,τY_|) is a dense subcompact subspace of (X,τ). Furthermore, for a dense-in-itself GO-space constructed on a set of real numbers, the existence of such a dense subspace Y of X is equivalent to pseudo-completeness of (X,τ) (in the sense of Oxtoby). These results eliminate many pathological sets of real numbers as potential counterexamples to the still-open question: “Is there a domain-representable GO-space constructed on a subset of R that is not subcompact”? Finally, we use our subcompactness results to show that any co-compact GO-space constructed on a subset of R must be subcompact.     

On some questions about KC and related spaces

Answering questions raised by O.T. Alas and R.G. Wilson, or by these two authors together with M.G. Tkachenko and V.V. Tkachuk, we show that every minimal SC space must be sequentially compact, and we produce the following examples:

-

a KC space which cannot be embedded in any compact KC space;

-

a countable KC space which does not admit any coarser compact KC topology;

-

a minimal Hausdorff space which is not a k-space.

We also give an example of a compact KC space such that every nonempty open subset of it is dense, even if, as pointed out to us by the referee, a completely different construction carried out by E.K. van Douwen in 1993 leads to a space with the same properties.     

The compact-open topology: A new perspective

This paper studies the compact-open topology on the set KC(X) of all real-valued functions defined on a Tychonoff space, which are continuous on compact subsets of X. In addition to metrizability, separability and second countability of this topology on KC(X), various kinds of topological properties of this topology are studied in detail. Actually the motivation for studying the compact-open topology on KC(X) lies in the attempt of having a simpler proof for the characterization of a completeness property of the compact-open topology on C(X), the set of all real-valued continuous functions on X.     

Tychonoff expansions with prescribed resolvability properties

The recent literature offers examples, specific and hand-crafted, of Tychonoff spaces (in ZFC) which respond negatively to these questions, due respectively to Ceder and Pearson (1967) [3] and to Comfort and García-Ferreira (2001) [5]: (1) Is every ω-resolvable space maximally resolvable? (2) Is every maximally resolvable space extraresolvable? Now using the method of KID expansion, the authors show that every suitably restricted Tychonoff topological space (X,T) admits a larger Tychonoff topology (that is, an “expansion”) witnessing such failure. Specifically the authors show in ZFC that if (X,T) is a maximally resolvable Tychonoff space with S(X,T)?Δ(X,T)=κ, then (X,T) has Tychonoff expansions U=Ui (1?i?5), with Δ(X,Ui)=Δ(X,T) and S(X,Ui)?Δ(X,Ui), such that (X,Ui) is: (i=1) ω-resolvable but not maximally resolvable; (i=2) [if κ^′ is regular, with S(X,T)?κ^′?κ] τ-resolvable for all τ<κ^′, but not κ^′-resolvable; (i=3) maximally resolvable, but not extraresolvable; (i=4) extraresolvable, but not maximally resolvable; (i=5) maximally resolvable and extraresolvable, but not strongly extraresolvable.     

On the tychonoff functor and w-compactness

The main purpose of this paper is to settle the following problem concerning a product formula for the Tychonoff functor τ, by introducing the notion of w-compact spaces: Characterize a topological space X such that τ(X×Y)=τ(X)×τ(Y) for any topological space Y. We also study the properties of w-compact spaces, and it is proved that, for any family {X_α} of w-compact spaces, the product ΠX_α is also w-compact and τ(ΠX_α)=Πτ(X_α).     

Local compactness and Hewitt realcompactifications of products II

We generalize and refine results from the author's paper [18]. For a completely regular Hausdorff space X, υX denotes the Hewitt realcompactification of X. It is proved that if υ(X×Y)=υX×υY for any metacompact subparacompact (or m-paracompact) space Y, then X is locally compact. A P(n)-space is a space in which every intersection of less than n open sets is open. A characterization of those spaces X such that υ (X×Y = υX×υY for any (metacompact) P(n)-space Y is also obtained.     

Lebesgue and co-Lebesgue di-uniform texture spaces

The author introduces the notions of Lebesgue di-uniformity and co Lebesgue di-uniformity and investigates the relationship between a Lebesgue quasi uniformity on X and the corresponding Lebesgue di-uniformity on the discrete texture (X,P(X)). Finally a notion of a dual dicovering Lebesgue quasi di-uniform texture space is introduced and several properties are discussed.     

On the product of homogeneous spaces

Within the class of Tychonoff spaces, and within the class of topological groups, most of the natural questions concerning ‘productive closure’ of the subclasses of countably compact and pseudocompact spaces are answered by the following three well-known results: (1) [ZFC] There is a countably compact Tychonoff space X such that X × X is not pseudocompact; (2) [ZFC] The product of any set of pseudocompact topological groups is pseudocompact; and (3) [ZFC+ MA] There are countably compact topological groups G₀, G₁ such that G₀ × G₁ is not countably compact.In this paper we consider the question of ‘productive closure” in the intermediate class of homogeneous spaces. Our principal result, whose proof leans heavily on a simple, elegant result of V.V. Uspenski?, is this: In ZFC there are pseudocompact, homogeneous spaces X₀, X₁ such that X₀ × X₁ is not pseudocompact; if in addition MA is assumed, the spaces X_i may be chosen countably compact.Our construction yields an unexpected corollary in a different direction: Every compact space embeds as a retract in a countably compact, homogeneous space. Thus for every cardinal number α there is a countably compact, homogeneous space whose Souslin number exceeds α.     

An asymmetric Ellis theorem

In 1957 Robert Ellis proved that a group with a locally compact Hausdorff topology T making all translations continuous also has jointly continuous multiplication and continuous inversion, and is thus a topological group. The theorem does not apply to locally compact asymmetric spaces such as the reals with addition and the topology of upper open rays. We first show a bitopological Ellis theorem, and then introduce a generalization of locally compact Hausdorff, called locally skew compact, and a topological dual, Tk, to obtain the following asymmetric Ellis theorem which applies to the example above:Whenever (X,⋅,T) is a group with a locally skew compact topology making all translations continuous, then multiplication is jointly continuous in both (X,⋅,T) and (X,⋅,Tk), and inversion is a homeomorphism between (X,T) and (X,Tk).This generalizes the classical Ellis theorem, because T=Tk when (X,T) is locally compact Hausdorff.     

Realcompactness of hyperspaces and extensions of open-closed maps

In response to questions of Ginsburg [9, 10], we prove that if cf(c)>ω₁, then there exists an open-closed, continuous map f from a normal, realcompact space X onto a space Y which is not realcompact. By his result the hyperspace 2^x of closed subsets of X is then not realcompact, and the extension μf(vf) of f to the topological completion (the Hewitt realcompactification) of X is not onto. The latter fact solves problems raised by Morita [16] and by Isiwata [12] both negatively. We also consider the problem whether or not the hyperspace of a hereditarily Lindelöf space is hereditarily realcompact.     

The notion of o-tightness and C-embedded subspaces of products

We consider the question: when is a dense subset of a space XC-embedded in X? We introduce the notion of o-tightness and prove that if each finite subproduct of a product X = Π_α?AX_α has a countable o-tightness and Y is a subset of X such that π_B(Y) = Π_α?BX_α for every countable B ? A, then Y is C-embedded in X. This result generalizes some of Noble and Ulmer's results on C-embedding.     

Countably compact hyperspaces and Frolík sums

Let H⁰(X) (H(X)) denote the set of all (nonempty) closed subsets of X endowed with the Vietoris topology. A basic problem concerning H(X) is to characterize those X for which H(X) is countably compact. We conjecture that u-compactness of X for some u∈ω^∗ (or equivalently: all powers of X are countably compact) may be such a characterization. We give some results that point into this direction.We define the property R(κ): for every family of closed subsets of X separated by pairwise disjoint open sets and any family of natural numbers, the product is countably compact, and prove that if H(X) is countably compact for a T₂-space X then X satisfies R(κ) for all κ. A space has R(1) iff all its finite powers are countably compact, so this generalizes a theorem of J. Ginsburg: if X is T₂ and H(X) is countably compact, then so is Xn for all n<ω. We also prove that, for κ<t, if the T₃ space X satisfies a weak form of R(κ), the orbit of every point in X is dense, and X contains κ pairwise disjoint open sets, then Xκ is countably compact. This generalizes the following theorem of J. Cao, T. Nogura, and A. Tomita: if X is T₃, homogeneous, and H(X) is countably compact, then so is Xω.Then we study the Frolík sum (also called “one-point countable-compactification”) of a family . We use the Frolík sum to produce countably compact spaces with additional properties (like first countability) whose hyperspaces are not countably compact. We also prove that any product _∏α<κH⁰(Xα) embeds into .     

On order structure of the set of one-point Tychonoff extensions of a locally compact space

If a Tychonoff space X is dense in a Tychonoff space Y, then Y is called a Tychonoff extension of X. Two Tychonoff extensions Y₁ and Y₂ of X are said to be equivalent, if there exists a homeomorphism which keeps X pointwise fixed. This defines an equivalence relation on the class of all Tychonoff extensions of X. We identify those extensions of X which belong to the same equivalence classes. For two Tychonoff extensions Y₁ and Y₂ of X, we write Y₂?Y₁, if there exists a continuous function which keeps X pointwise fixed. This is a partial order on the set of all (equivalence classes of) Tychonoff extensions of X. If a Tychonoff extension Y of X is such that Y\X is a singleton, then Y is called a one-point extension of X. Let T(X) denote the set of all one-point extensions of X. Our purpose is to study the order structure of the partially ordered set (T(X),?). For a locally compact space X, we define an order-anti-isomorphism from T(X) onto the set of all nonempty closed subsets of βX\X. We consider various sets of one-point extensions, including the set of all one-point locally compact extensions of X, the set of all one-point Lindelöf extensions of X, the set of all one-point pseudocompact extensions of X, and the set of all one-point ?ech-complete extensions of X, among others. We study how these sets of one-point extensions are related, and investigate the relation between their order structure, and the topology of subspaces of βX\X. We find some lower bounds for cardinalities of some of these sets of one-point extensions, and in a concluding section, we show how some of our results may be applied to obtain relations between the order structure of certain subfamilies of ideals of C^∗(X), partially ordered with inclusion, and the topology of subspaces of βX\X. We leave some problems open.     

Continuous mappings on subspaces of products with the κ-box topology

Much of General Topology addresses this issue: Given a function f∈C(Y,Z) with Y⊆Y^′ and Z⊆Z^′, find , or at least , such that ; sometimes Z=Z^′ is demanded. In this spirit the authors prove several quite general theorems in the context Y^′=κ(XI)=_∏i∈IXi in the κ-box topology (that is, with basic open sets of the form _∏i∈IUi with Ui open in Xi and with Ui≠Xi for <κ-many i∈I). A representative sample result, extending to the κ-box topology some results of Comfort and Negrepontis, of Noble and Ulmer, and of Hušek, is this.

Theorem. Letω?κ?α (that means: κ<α, and[β<αandλ<κ]⇒βλ<α) with α regular,be a set of non-empty spaces with eachd(Xi)<α,π[Y]=XJfor each non-emptyJ⊆Isuch that|J|<α, and the diagonal in Z be the intersection of <α-many regular-closed subsets ofZ×Z. Then (a) Y is pseudo-(α,α)-compact, (b) for everyf∈C(Y,Z)there isJ∈[I]^<αsuch thatf(x)=f(y)wheneverxJ=yJ, and (c) every such f extends to.     

The orderability of nonarchimedean spaces

Let X be a nonarchimedean space and C be the union of all compact open subsets of X. The following conditions are listed in increasing order of generality. (Conditions 2 and 3 are equivalent.) 1. X is perfect; 2. C is an F_σ in X; 3. C? is metrizable; 4. X is orderable. It is also shown that X is orderable if $\text{C}\text{?}\text{?C}$ is scattered or X is a GO space with countably many pseudogaps. An example is given of a non-orderable, totally disconnected, GO space with just one pseudogap.     

Real dicompactifications of ditopological texture spaces

Real dicompactifications and dicompactifications of a ditopological texture space are defined and studied.Section 2 considers nearly plain extensions of a ditopological texture space (S,S,τ,κ). Spaces that possess a nearly plain extension are shown to have a property, called here almost plainness, that is weaker than that of near plainness, but which shares with near plainness the existence of an associated plain space (Sp,Sp,τp,κp). Some properties of the class of almost plain ditopological texture spaces are established, a notion of canonical nearly plain extension of an almost plain ditopological texture space, projective and injective pre-orderings and the concept of isomorphism on such canonical nearly plain extensions are defined.In Section 3 the notion of nearly plain extension is specialized to that of real dicompactification and dicompactification, and the spaces that have such extensions are characterized. Working in terms of a specific representation of the canonical real dicompactifications and dicompactifications of a completely biregular bi-T₂ almost plain ditopological space, the interrelation between sub-T-lattices of the T-lattice of ω-preserving bicontinuous real mappings on the associated plain space and the real dicompactifications and dicompactifications are investigated. In particular generalizations of the Hewitt realcompactification and Stone-?ech compactification are obtained, and shown to be reflectors for the appropriate categories.     

On sieve-complete and compact-like spaces

It is shown that a completely regular space X is sieve-complete (or, equivalenty, X is the open image of a paracompact ?ech-complete space) iff βX?X is compact-like, i.e., Player I has a winning strategy in the topological game G(C, βX?X) of [13].