Constrained Ramsey numbers for rainbow matching

The Ramsey number R_k(G) of a graph G is the minimum number N, such that any edge coloring of K_N with k colors contains a monochromatic copy of G. The constrained Ramsey number f(G, T) of the graphs G and T is the minimum number N, such that any edge coloring of K_N with any number of colors contains a monochromatic copy of G or a rainbow copy of T. We show that these two quantities are closely related when T is a matching. Namely, for almost all graphs G, f(G, tK₂) = R_{t ? 1}(G) for t≥2. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 67:91‐95, 2011     

Star-critical Ramsey numbers

The graph Ramsey numberR(G,H) is the smallest integer r such that every 2-coloring of the edges of K_r contains either a red copy of G or a blue copy of H. We find the largest star that can be removed from K_r such that the underlying graph is still forced to have a red G or a blue H. Thus, we introduce the star-critical Ramsey numberr_∗(G,H) as the smallest integer k such that every 2-coloring of the edges of K_r−K_1,r−1−k contains either a red copy of G or a blue copy of H. We find the star-critical Ramsey number for trees versus complete graphs, multiple copies of K₂ and K₃, and paths versus a 4-cycle. In addition to finding the star-critical Ramsey numbers, the critical graphs are classified for R(T_n,K_m), R(nK₂,mK₂) and R(P_n,C₄).     

Two remarks on the Burr–Erdős conjecture

The Ramsey number r(H) of a graph H is the minimum positive integer N such that every two-coloring of the edges of the complete graph K_N on N vertices contains a monochromatic copy of H. A graph H is d-degenerate if every subgraph of H has minimum degree at most d. Burr and Erdős in 1975 conjectured that for each positive integer d there is a constant c_d such that r(H)≤c_dn for every d-degenerate graph H on n vertices. We show that for such graphs , improving on an earlier bound of Kostochka and Sudakov. We also study Ramsey numbers of random graphs, showing that for d fixed, almost surely the random graph G(n,d/n) has Ramsey number linear in n. For random bipartite graphs, our proof gives nearly tight bounds.     

Planar Ramsey numbers for cycles

For two given graphs G and H the planar Ramsey number PR(G,H) is the smallest integer n such that every planar graph F on n vertices either contains a copy of G or its complement contains a copy H. By studying the existence of subhamiltonian cycles in complements of sparse graphs, we determine all planar Ramsey numbers for pairs of cycles.     

Longest Paths and Longest Cycles in Graphs with Large Degree Sums

 Let p(G) and c(G) denote the number of vertices in a longest path and a longest cycle, respectively, of a finite, simple graph G. Define σ₄(G)=min{d(x ₁)+d(x ₂)+ d(x ₃)+d(x ₄) | {x ₁,…,x ₄} is independent in G}. In this paper, the difference p(G)−c(G) is considered for 2-connected graphs G with σ₄(G)≥|V(G)|+3. Among others, we show that p(G)−c(G)≤2 or every longest path in G is a dominating path. Received: August 28, 2000 Final version received: May 23, 2002     

Finding a monochromatic subgraph or a rainbow path

For simple graphs G and H, let f(G,H) denote the least integer N such that every coloring of the edges of K_N contains either a monochromatic copy of G or a rainbow copy of H. Here we investigate f(G,H) when H = P_k. We show that even if the number of colors is unrestricted when defining f(G,H), the function f(G,P_k), for k = 4 and 5, equals the (k ? 2)‐ coloring diagonal Ramsey number of G. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory     

A note on Ramsey multiplicity

If G₁ and G₂ are graphs and the Ramsey number r(G₁, G₂) = p, then the fewest number of G₁ in G and G₂ in ? (G complement) that occur in a graph G on p points is called the Ramsey multiplicity and denoted R(G₁, G₂). In [2, 3] the diagonal (i.e. G₁ = G₂) Ramsey multiplicities are derived for graphs on 3 and 4 points, with the exception of K₄. In this note an upper bound is established for R(K_s, K₁). Specifically, we show that R(K₄, K₄) ? 12.     

Search algorithm for Ramsey graphs by union of group orbits

An algorithm for the construction of Ramsey graphs with a given automorphism group G is presented. To find a graph on n vertices with no clique of k vertices, K_k, and no independent set of l vertices, ¯K_l, k, l ≤ n, with an automorphism group G, a Boolean formula α based on the G-orbits of k-subsets and l-subsets of vertices is constructed from incidence matrices belonging to G. This Boolean formula is satisfiable if and only if the desired graph exists, and each satisfying assignment to α specifies a set of orbits of pairs of vertices whose union gives the edges of such a graph. Finding these assignments is basically equivalent to the conversion of α from CNF to DNF (conjunctive to disjunctive normal form). Though the latter problem is NP-hard, we present an “efficient” method to do the conversion for the formulas that appear in this particular problem. When G is taken to be the dihedral group D_n for n ≤ 101, this method matches all of the previously known cyclic Ramsey graphs, as reported by F. R. K. Chung and C. M. Grinstead [“A Survey of Bounds for Classical Ramsey Numbers,” Journal of Graph Theory, 7 (1983), 25–38], in dramatically smaller computer time when compared to the time required by an exhaustive search. Five new lower bounds for the classical Ramsey numbers are established: R(4, 7) ? 47, R(4, 8) ? 52, R(4, 9) ? 69, R(5,7) ? 76, and R(5, 8) ? 94. Also, some previously known cyclic graphs are shown to be unique up to isomorphism.     

On graphs with small Ramsey numbers*

Let R(G) denote the minimum integer N such that for every bicoloring of the edges of K_N, at least one of the monochromatic subgraphs contains G as a subgraph. We show that for every positive integer d and each γ,0 < γ < 1, there exists k = k(d,γ) such that for every bipartite graph G = (W,U;E) with the maximum degree of vertices in W at most d and , . This answers a question of Trotter. We give also a weaker bound on the Ramsey numbers of graphs whose set of vertices of degree at least d + 1 is independent. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Graph Theory 37: 198–204, 2001     

The size Ramsey number of trees with bounded degree

The size Ramsey number r?(G, H) of graphs G and H is the smallest integer r? such that there is a graph F with r? edges and if the edge set of F is red-blue colored, there exists either a red copy of G or a blue copy of H in F. This article shows that r?(T_nd, T_nd) ? c · d² · n and c · n³ ? r?(K_n, T_nd) ? c(d)·n³ log n for every tree T_nd on n vertices. and maximal degree at most d and a complete graph K_n on n vertices. A generalization will be given. Probabilistic method is used throught this paper. © 1993 John Wiley Sons, Inc.     

P. Hall's covering group and embeddings of countable cc-groups

Let A be an elementary abelian group of order at least p ³ acting on a finite p′-group G that is soluble with derived length d. Assume that γ _c (C _G (a)) has exponent dividing m for any a ∈ A ^#. It is proved that there exist {p, d, c, m}-bounded numbers c ₁ and m ₁ such that γ _{c 1} (G) has exponent dividing m ₁.     

Merging percolation on Zd and classical random graphs: Phase transition

We study a random graph model which is a superposition of bond percolation on Z^d with parameter p, and a classical random graph G(n,c/n). We show that this model, being a homogeneous random graph, has a natural relation to the so‐called “rank 1 case” of inhomogeneous random graphs. This allows us to use the newly developed theory of inhomogeneous random graphs to describe the phase diagram on the set of parameters c ≥ 0 and 0 ≤ p < p_c, where p_c = p_c(d) is the critical probability for the bond percolation on Z^d. The phase transition is of second order as in the classical random graph. We find the scaled size of the largest connected component in the supercritical regime. We also provide a sharp upper bound for the largest connected component in the subcritical regime. The latter is a new result for inhomogeneous random graphs with unbounded kernels. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Random Struct. Alg., 2010     

Properly colored subgraphs and rainbow subgraphs in edge‐colorings with local constraints

We consider a canonical Ramsey type problem. An edge‐coloring of a graph is called m‐good if each color appears at most m times at each vertex. Fixing a graph G and a positive integer m, let f(m, G) denote the smallest n such that every m‐good edge‐coloring of K_n yields a properly edge‐colored copy of G, and let g(m, G) denote the smallest n such that every m‐good edge‐coloring of K_n yields a rainbow copy of G. We give bounds on f(m, G) and g(m, G). For complete graphs G = K_t, we have c₁mt²/ln t ≤ f(m, K_t) ≤ c₂mt², and cmt³/ln t ≤ g(m, K_t) ≤ cmt³/ln t, where c₁, c₂, c, c are absolute constants. We also give bounds on f(m, G) and g(m, G) for general graphs G in terms of degrees in G. In particular, we show that for fixed m and d, and all sufficiently large n compared to m and d, f(m, G) = n for all graphs G with n vertices and maximum degree at most d. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Random Struct. Alg., 2003     

Large Kr‐free subgraphs in Ks‐free graphs and some other Ramsey‐type problems

In this paper we present three Ramsey‐type results, which we derive from a simple and yet powerful lemma, proved using probabilistic arguments. Let 3 ≤ r < s be fixed integers and let G be a graph on n vertices not containing a complete graph K_s on s vertices. More than 40 years ago Erd?s and Rogers posed the problem of estimating the maximum size of a subset of G without a copy of the complete graph K_r. Our first result provides a new lower bound for this problem, which improves previous results of various researchers. It also allows us to solve some special cases of a closely related question posed by Erd?s. For two graphs G and H, the Ramsey number R(G, H) is the minimum integer N such that any red‐blue coloring of the edges of the complete graph K_N, contains either a red copy of G or a blue copy of H. The book with n pages is the graph B_n consisting of n triangles sharing one edge. Here we study the book‐complete graph Ramsey numbers and show that R(B_n, K_n) ≤ O(n³/log^3/2n), improving the bound of Li and Rousseau. Finally, motivated by a question of Erd?s, Hajnal, Simonovits, Sós, and Szemerédi, we obtain for all 0 < δ < 2/3 an estimate on the number of edges in a K₄‐free graph of order n which has no independent set of size n^1‐δ. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Random Struct. Alg., 2005     

On upper domination Ramsey numbers for graphs

The classical Ramsey number r(m,n) can be defined as the smallest integer p such that in every two-coloring (R,B) of the edges of K_p, β(B)⩾m or β(R)⩾n, where β(G) denotes the independence number of a graph G. We define the upper domination Ramsey number u(m,n) as the smallest integer p such that in every two-coloring (R,B) of the edges of K_p, Γ(B)⩾m or Γ(R)⩾n, where Γ(G) is the maximum cardinality of a minimal dominating set of a graph G. The mixed domination Ramsey number v(m,n) is defined to be the smallest integer p such that in every two-coloring (R,B) of the edges of K_p, Γ(B)⩾m or β(R)⩾n. Since β(G)⩽Γ(G) for every graph G, u(m,n)⩽v(m,n)⩽r(m,n). We develop techniques to obtain upper bounds for upper domination Ramsey numbers of the form u(3,n) and mixed domination Ramsey numbers of the form v(3,n). We show that u(3,3)=v(3,3)=6, u(3,4)=8, v(3,4)=9, u(3,5)=v(3,5)=12 and u(3,6)=v(3,6)=15.     

Some connected ramsey numbers

A graph G is co-connected if both G and its complement ? are connected and nontrivial. For two graphs A and B, the connected Ramsey number r_c(A, B) is the smallest integer n such that there exists a co-connected graph of order n, and if G is a co-connected graph on at least n vertices, then A ? G or B ? ?. If neither A or B contains a bridge, then it is known that r_c(A, B) = r(A, B), where r(A, B) denotes the usual Ramsey number of A and B. In this paper r_c(A, B) is calculated for some pairs (A, B) when r(A, B) is known and at least one of the graphs A or B has a bridge. In particular, r_c(A, B) is calculated for A a path and B either a cycle, star, or complete graph, and for A a star and B a complete graph.     

On the Size‐Ramsey Number of Hypergraphs

The size‐Ramsey number of a graph G is the minimum number of edges in a graph H such that every 2‐edge‐coloring of H yields a monochromatic copy of G. Size‐Ramsey numbers of graphs have been studied for almost 40 years with particular focus on the case of trees and bounded degree graphs. We initiate the study of size‐Ramsey numbers for k‐uniform hypergraphs. Analogous to the graph case, we consider the size‐Ramsey number of cliques, paths, trees, and bounded degree hypergraphs. Our results suggest that size‐Ramsey numbers for hypergraphs are extremely difficult to determine, and many open problems remain.     

Generalized Ramsey theory for multiple colors

In this paper, we study the generalized Ramsey number r(G₁,…, G_k) where the graphs G₁,…, G_k consist of complete graphs, complete bipartite graphs, paths, and cycles. Our main theorem gives the Ramsey number for the case where G₂,…, G_k are fixed and G₁ C_n or P_n with n sufficiently large. If among G₂,…, G_k there are both complete graphs and odd cycles, the main theorem requires an additional hypothesis concerning the size of the odd cycles relative to their number. If among G₂,…, G_k there are odd cycles but no complete graphs, then no additional hypothesis is necessary and complete results can be expressed in terms of a new type of Ramsey number which is introduced in this paper. For k = 3 and k = 4 we determine all necessary values of the new Ramsey number and so obtain, in particular, explicit and complete results for the cycle Ramsey numbers r(C_n, C_l, C_k) and r(C_n, C_l, C_k, C_m) when n is large.     

The Ramsey numbers for cycles versus wheels of odd order

For two given graphs G₁ and G₂, the Ramsey number R(G₁,G₂) is the smallest integer n such that for any graph G of order n, either G contains G₁ or the complement of G contains G₂. Let C_n denote a cycle of order n and W_m a wheel of order m+1. It is conjectured by Surahmat, E.T. Baskoro and I. Tomescu that R(C_n,W_m)=2n−1 for even m≥4, n≥m and (n,m)≠(4,4). In this paper, we confirm the conjecture for n≥3m/2+1.     

On Ramsey Numbers for Trees Versus Wheels of Five or Six Vertices

 For given two graphs G dan H, the Ramsey number R(G,H) is the smallest positive integer n such that every graph F of order n must contain G or the complement of F must contain H. In [12], the Ramsey numbers for the combination between a star S _n and a wheel W _m for m=4,5 were shown, namely, R(S _n ,W ₄)=2n−1 for odd n and n≥3, otherwise R(S _n ,W ₄)=2n+1, and R(S _n ,W ₅)=3n−2 for n≥3. In this paper, we shall study the Ramsey number R(G,W _m ) for G any tree T _n . We show that if T _n is not a star then the Ramsey number R(T _n ,W ₄)=2n−1 for n≥4 and R(T _n ,W ₅)=3n−2 for n≥3. We also list some open problems. Received: October, 2001 Final version received: July 11, 2002 RID="*" ID="*" This work was supported by the QUE Project, Department of Mathematics ITB Indonesia Acknowledgments. We would like to thank the referees for several helpful comments.