Transition‐Metal‐Mediated Cleavage of a SiSi Double Bond

Reaction of carbene‐stabilized disilicon ( 1 ) with Fe(CO)₅ gives the 1:1 adduct L:Si?Si[Fe(CO)₄]:L (L:=C{N(2,6‐Prⁱ₂C₆H₃)CH}₂) ( 2 ) at room temperature. At raised temperature, however, 2 may react with another equivalent of Fe(CO)₅ to give L:Si[μ‐Fe₂(CO)₆](μ‐CO)Si:L ( 3 ) through insertion of both CO and Fe₂(CO)₆ into the Si₂ core, which represents the first experimental realization of transition metal‐carbonyl‐mediated cleavage of a Si?Si double bond. The structures and bonding of both 2 and 3 have been investigated by spectroscopic, crystallographic, and computational methods.     

A Series of Isolable Silanoic Thio‐, Seleno‐, and Telluroesters (LSi(X)OR) with Donor‐Supported SiX Double Bonds (L=β‐Diketiminate; X=S,Se, Te)

The first silicon analogues of carbonic (carboxylic) esters, the silanoic thio‐, seleno‐, and tellurosilylesters 3 (Si?S), 4 (Si?Se), and 5 (Si?Te), were prepared and isolated in crystalline form in high yield. These thermally robust compounds are easily accessible by direct reaction of the stable siloxysilylene L(Si:)OSi(H)L′ 2 (L=HC(CMe)₂[N(aryl)₂], L′=CH[(C?CH₂)‐CMe][N(aryl)]₂; aryl=2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃) with the respective elemental chalcogen. The novel compounds were fully characterized by methods including multinuclear NMR spectroscopy and single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis. Owing to intramolecular N→Si donor–acceptor support of the Si?X moieties (X=S, Se, Te), these compounds have a classical valence‐bond N⁺–Si–X^? resonance betaine structure. At the same time, they also display a relatively strong nonclassical Si?X π‐bonding interaction between the chalcogen lone‐pair electrons (n_π donor orbitals) and two antibonding Si? N orbitals (σ*_π acceptor orbitals mainly located at silicon), which was shown by IR and UV/Vis spectroscopy. Accordingly, the Si?X bonds in the chalcogenoesters are 7.4 ( 3 ), 6.7 ( 4 ), and 6.9 % ( 5 ) shorter than the corresponding Si? X single bonds and, thus, only a little longer than those in electronically less disturbed Si?X systems (“heavier” ketones).     

SiSi Double Bonds: Synthesis of an NHC‐Stabilized Disilavinylidene

An efficient two‐step synthesis of the first NHC‐stabilized disilavinylidene (Z)‐(SIdipp)SiSi(Br)Tbb ( 2 ; SIdipp=C[N(C₆H₃‐2,6‐iPr₂)CH₂]₂, Tbb=C₆H₂‐2,6‐[CH(SiMe₃)₂]₂‐4‐tBu, NHC=N‐heterocyclic carbene) is reported. The first step of the procedure involved a 2:1 reaction of SiBr₂(SIdipp) with the 1,2‐dibromodisilene (E)‐Tbb(Br)SiSi(Br)Tbb at 100 °C, which afforded selectively an unprecedented NHC‐stabilized bromo(silyl)silylene, namely SiBr(SiBr₂Tbb)(SIdipp) ( 1 ). Alternatively, compound 1 could be obtained from the 2:1 reaction of SiBr₂(SIdipp) with LiTbb at low temperature. 1 was then selectively reduced with C₈K to give the NHC‐stabilized disilavinylidene 2 . Both low‐valent silicon compounds were comprehensively characterized by X‐ray diffraction analysis, multinuclear NMR spectroscopy, and elemental analyses. Additionally, the electronic structure of 2 was studied by various quantum‐chemical methods.     

Two‐Coordinate Magnesium(I) Dimers Stabilized by Super Bulky Amido Ligands

A variety of very bulky amido magnesium iodide complexes, LMgI(solvent)_0/1 and [LMg(μ‐I)(solvent)_0/1]₂ (L=‐N(Ar)(SiR₃); Ar=C₆H₂{C(H)Ph₂}₂R′‐2,6,4; R=Me, Prⁱ, Ph, or OBu^t; R′=Prⁱ or Me) have been prepared by three synthetic routes. Structurally characterized examples of these materials include the first unsolvated amido magnesium halide complexes, such as [LMg(μ‐I)]₂ (R=Me, R′=Prⁱ). Reductions of several such complexes with KC₈ in the absence of coordinating solvents have afforded the first two‐coordinate magnesium(I) dimers, LMg?MgL (R=Me, Prⁱ or Ph; R′=Prⁱ, or Me), in low to good yields. Reductions of two of the precursor complexes in the presence of THF have given the related THF adduct complexes, L(THF)Mg?Mg(THF)L (R=Me; R′=Prⁱ) and LMg?Mg(THF)L (R=Prⁱ; R′=Me) in trace yields. The X‐ray crystal structures of all magnesium(I) complexes were obtained. DFT calculations on the unsolvated examples reveal their Mg?Mg bonds to be covalent and of high s‐character, while Ph???Mg bonding interactions in the compounds were found to be weak at best.     

1,1‐Ethylboration of alkyn‐1‐yl‐chloro(methyl)silanes: alkenes with chloro(methyl)silyl and diethylboryl groups in cis positions

The 1,1‐ethylboration of alkyn‐1‐yl‐chloro(methyl)silanes, Me₂Si(Cl)? C?C? R ( 1 ) and Me(H)Si(Cl)? C?C? R ( 2 ) [R = Bu ( 2a ), CH₂NMe₂ ( 2b )] requires harsh reaction conditions (up to 20 days in boiling triethylborane), and leads to alkenes in which the boryl and silyl groups occupy cis ((E)‐isomers: 3a , 3b , 5a , 5b ) or trans positions ((Z)‐isomers in smaller quantities: 4b and 6b ). The alkenes are destabilized in the presence of SiH(Cl) and CH₂NMe₂ units ( 5b , 6b ). NMR data indicate hyper‐coordinated silicon by intramolecular N? Si coordination in 3b and 5b , by which, at the same time, weak Si? Cl? B bridges are favoured. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

二（胍基）锆配合物的合成和表征

Addition of one equivalent of LiN（i-Pr）2 or LiN（CH2）5 to carbodiimides, RN=C=NR [R=cyclohexyl （Cy）, isopropyl （i-Pr）], generated the corresponding lithium of tetrasubstituted guanidinates {Li[RNC（N R^′2）NR]（THF）}2 [R=i-Pr, N R^′2=N（i-Pr）2 （1）, N（CH2）5 （2）; R=Cy, N R^′2=N（i-Pr）2 （3）, N（CH2）5 （4）]. Treatment of ZrCl4 with freshly prepared solutions of their lithium guanidinates provided a series of bis（guanidinate） complexes of Zr with the general formula Zr[RNC（N R^′2）NR]2Cl2 [R=i-Pr, N R^′2=N（i-Pr）2 （5）, N（CH2）5 （6）; R=Cy, N R^′2=N（i-Pr）2 （7）, N（CH2）5 （8）]. Complexes 1, 2, 5-8 were characterized by elemental analysis, IR and ^1H NMR spectra. The molecular structures of complexes 1, 7 and 8 were further determined by X-ray diffraction studies.     

Synthesis and characterization of aluminum(III) and tin(II) complexes supported by diiminophosphinate ligands and their application in ring‐opening polymerization catalysis of ε‐caprolactone

A series of Al(III) and Sn(II) diiminophosphinate complexes have been synthesized. Reaction of Ph(ArCH₂)P(?NBu^t)NHBu^t (Ar = Ph, 3 ; Ar = 8‐quinolyl, 4 ) with AlR₃ (R = Me, Et) gave aluminum complexes [R₂Al{(NBu^t)₂P(Ph)(CH₂Ar)}] (R = Me, Ar = Ph, 5 ; R = Me, Ar = 8‐quinolyl, 6 ; R = Et, Ar = Ph, 7 ; R = Et, Ar = quinolyl, 8 ). Lithiated 3 and 4 were treated with SnCl₂ to afford tin(II) complexes [ClSn{(NBu^t)₂P(Ph)(CH₂Ar)}] (Ar = Ph, 9 ; Ar = 8‐quinolyl, 10 ). Complex 9 was converted to [(Me₃Si)₂NSn{(NBu^t)₂P(Ph)(CH₂Ph)}] ( 11 ) by treatment with LiN(SiMe₃)₂. Complex 11 was also obtained by reaction of 3 with [Sn{N(SiMe₃)₂}₂]. Complex 9 reacted with [LiOC₆H₄Bu^t‐4] to yield [4‐Bu^tC₆H₄OSn{(NBu^t)₂P(Ph)(CH₂Ph)}] ( 12 ). Compounds 3–12 were characterized by NMR spectroscopy and elemental analysis. The structures of complexes 6 , 10 , and 11 were further characterized by single crystal X‐ray diffraction techniques. The catalytic activity of complexes 5–8 , 11 , and 12 toward the ring‐opening polymerization of ε‐caprolactone (CL) was studied. In the presence of BzOH, the complexes catalyzed the ring‐opening polymerization of ε‐CL in the activity order of 5 > 7 ≈ 8 > 6 ? 11 > 12 , giving polymers with narrow molecular weight distributions. The kinetic studies showed a first‐order dependency on the monomer concentration in each case. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 44: 4621–4631, 2006     

Zur Bildung und Struktur der Phosphinophosphiniden-phosphorane tBu2P?PP(Me)tBu2 1, tBu(Me3Si)P?PP(Me)tBu2 2 und tBu2P?PP(Br)tBu2 3

Synthesis and Structure of Phosphinophosphinidene-phosphoranes tBu₂P? P?P(Me)tBu₂ 1, tBu(Me₃Si)P? P?P(Me)tBu₂ 2, and tBu₂P? P?P(Br)tBu₂ 3 A new method for the synthesis of 1 and 2 (Formulae see ?Inhaltsübersicht”?) is reported based on the reaction of 5 with substitution reagents (Me₂SO₄ or CH₃Cl). The results of the X-ray structure determination of 1 and 2 are given and compared with those of 3 . While in 3 one P? P distance corresponds to a double bond and the other P? P distance to a single bond (difference 12.5 pm) the differences of the P? P distances in 1 and 2 are much smaller: 5.28 pm in 1 , 4.68 pm in 2 . Both 1 and 2 crystallize monoclinic in the space group P2₁/n (Z = 4). 2 additionally contains two disordered molecules of the solvent pentane in the unit cell. Parameters of 1 : a = 884.32(8) pm, b = 1 924.67(25) pm, c = 1 277.07(13) pm, β = 100.816(8)°, and of 2 : a = 1 101.93(12) pm, b = 1 712.46(18) pm, c = 1 395.81(12) pm, β = 111.159(7)°, all data collected at 143 K. The skeleton of the three P atoms is bent (PPP angle 100.95° for 1 , 100.29° for 2 and 105.77° for 3 ). Ab initio SCF calculations are used to discuss the bonding situation in the molecular skeleton of the three P atoms of 1 and 3 . The results show a significant contribution of the ionic structure R₂P? P(^?)? P(⁺)(X)R₂. The structure with (partially) charged P atoms is stabilized by bulky polarizable groups R (as tBu) as compared to the fully covalent structure R₂P? P(X)? PR₂.     

SiP Double Bonds: Experimental and Theoretical Study of an NHC‐Stabilized Phosphasilenylidene

An experimental and theoretical study of the first compound featuring a Si?P bond to a two‐coordinate silicon atom is reported. The NHC‐stabilized phosphasilenylidene (IDipp)Si?PMes* (IDipp=1,3‐bis(2,6‐diisopropylphenyl)imidazolin‐2‐ylidene, Mes*=2,4,6‐tBu₃C₆H₂) was prepared by SiMe₃Cl elimination from SiCl₂(IDipp) and LiP(Mes*)SiMe₃ and characterized by X‐ray crystallography, NMR spectroscopy, cyclic voltammetry, and UV/Vis spectroscopy. It has a planar trans‐bent geometry with a short Si? P distance of 2.1188(7) Å and acute bonding angles at Si (96.90(6)°) and P (95.38(6)°). The bonding parameters indicate the presence of a Si?P bond with a lone electron pair of high s‐character at Si and P, in agreement with natural bond orbital (NBO) analysis. Comparative cyclic voltammetric and UV/Vis spectroscopic experiments of this compound, the disilicon(0) compound (IDipp)Si?Si(IDipp), and the diphosphene Mes*P?PMes* reveal, in combination with quantum chemical calculations, the isolobal relationship of the three double‐bond systems.     

Zur Reaktion von Diphenoxyphosphorylchlorid mit N,N-disubstituierten Harnstoffen – Bildung von phosphorylierten Biuret-Verbindungen

Reaction of Diphenoxyphosphorylchloride with N,N-disubstituted Ureas – Formation of Phosphorylated Biuret Compounds N′,N′-disubstituted N-diphenoxyphosphorylureas, (PhO)₂P(O)? NH? CO? NR¹R² (R¹ = R² = Et, 1 ; n-Pr, 2 ; n-Bu, 3 ; i-Bu, 4 ; R¹ = Me and R² = Ph, 5 ) as well as phosphorylated biuret compounds, (PhO)₂P(O)? NH? CO? NH? CO? NR¹R² are obtained in the reaction of diphenoxyphosphorylchloride with N,N-disubstituted ureas and triethylamine. The biuret derivatives are formed via (PhO)₂P(O)NCO. Their yield rises if the reaction is carried out without amine. The X-ray crystal structure analysis of (PhO)₂P(O)? NH? CO? NH? CO? NPr₂, 8 , shows that dimers exist in the crystal with intermolecular as well as intramolecular hydrogen bonds. The framework formed by atoms P? N1? C1(O4)? N2? C2(O5)? N3(C3)C6 is planar. The existence of a rotation barrier along the bond C2–N3 was detected by NMR spectroscopy.     

Nitro‐substituted iron(II) tridentate bis(imino)pyridine complexes as high‐temperature catalysts for the production of α‐olefins

A new series of nitro‐substituted bis(imino)pyridine ligands {2,6‐bis[1‐(2‐methyl‐4‐nitrophenylimino)ethyl]pyridine, 2,6‐bis[1‐(4‐nitrophenylimino)ethyl]pyridine, (1‐{6‐[1‐(4‐nitro‐phenylimino)‐ethyl]‐pyridin‐2‐yl}‐ethylidene)‐(2,4,6‐trimethyl‐phenyl)‐amine, and 2,6‐bis[1‐(2‐methyl‐3‐nitrophenylimino)ethyl]pyridine} and their corresponding Fe(II) complexes [{p‐NO₂? o‐Me? Ph? N?C(Me)? Py? C(Me)?N? Ph? o‐ Me? p‐NO₂}FeCl₂ ( 10 ), L₂FeCl₂ ( 11 ), {m‐NO₂? o‐Me? Ph? N?C(Me)? Py? C(Me)?N? Ph? o‐Me? m‐NO₂}FeCl₂ ( 12 ), and {p‐NO₂? Ph? N?C(Me)? Py? C(Me)?N? Mes}FeCl₂ ( 14 )] were synthesized. According to X‐ray analysis, there were shortenings of the axial Fe? N bond lengths (up to 0.014 Å) in para‐nitro‐substituted complex 10 and (up to 0.015 Å) in meta‐nitro‐substituted complex 12 versus the Fe(II) complex without nitro groups [{o‐Me? Ph? N?C(Me)? Py? C(Me)?N? Ph? o‐Me}FeCl₂ ( 1 )]. Complexes 10 , 12 , and 14 afforded very active catalysts for the production of α‐olefins and were more temperature‐stable and had longer lifetimes than parent non‐nitro‐substituted Fe(II) complex 1 . The reaction between FeCl₂ and a sterically less hindered ligand [p‐NO₂? Ph? N?C(Me)? Py? C(Me)?N? Ph? p‐NO₂] resulted in the formation of octahedral complex 11 . A para‐dialkylamino‐substituted bis(imino)pyridine ligand [p‐NEt₂? o‐Me? Ph? N?C(Me)? Py? C(Me)?N? Ph? o‐Me? p‐NEt₂] and the corresponding Fe(II) complex [{p‐NEt₂? o‐Me? Ph? N?C(Me)? Py? C(Me)?N? Ph? o‐Me? p‐NEt₂}FeCl₂ ( 16 )] were synthesized to evaluate the effect of enhanced electron donation of the ligand on the catalytic performance. According to X‐ray analysis, there was a shortening (up to 0.043 Å) of the axial Fe? N bond lengths in para‐diethylamino‐substituted complex 16 in comparison with parent Fe(II) complex 1 . © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 44: 2615–2635, 2006     

Synthesis and Reactivity towards DIBAL‐H of Cyclo‐Siloxanes cyclo‐[R2SiOSi(Ot‐Bu)2O]2, cyclo‐(t‐BuO)2Si(OSiR2)2O,and cyclo‐R2Si[OSi(Ot‐Bu)2]2O (R = Me,Ph)

The six‐, eight‐ and twelve‐membered cyclo‐siloxanes, cyclo‐[R₂SiOSi(Ot‐Bu)₂O]₂ (R = Me ( 1 ), Ph ( 2 )), cyclo‐(t‐BuO)₂Si(OSiR₂)₂O (R = Me ( 3 ), Ph ( 4 )), cyclo‐R₂Si[OSi(Ot‐Bu)₂]₂O (R = Me ( 5 ), Ph ( 6 )) and cyclo‐[(t‐BuO)₂Si(OSiMe₂)₂O]₂ ( 3a ) were synthesized in high yields by the reaction of (t‐BuO)₂Si(OH)₂ and [(t‐BuO)₂SiOH]₂O with R₂SiCl₂ and (R₂SiCl)₂O (R = Me, Ph). Compounds 1 — 6 were characterized by solution and solid‐state ²⁹Si NMR spectroscopy, electrospray mass spectrometry and osmometric molecular weight determination. The molecular structure of 4 has been determined by single crystal X‐ray diffraction and features a six‐membered cyclo‐siloxane ring that is essentially planar. The reduction of 1 — 6 with i‐Bu₂AlH (DIBAL‐H) led to the formation of the metastable aluminosiloxane (t‐BuO)₂Si(OAli‐Bu₂)₂ ( 7 ) along with Me₂SiH₂ and Ph₂SiH₂.     

P‐Aminophosphaalkenes with C‐Isopropyldimethylsilyl Groups

Amination of the C‐isopropyldimethylsilyl P‐chlorophosphaalkene (iPrMe₂Si)₂C=PCl ( 1 ) leads to the P‐aminophosphaalkenes (iPrMe₂Si)₂C=PN(R)R′ (R, R′ = Me ( 2 ), R = H, R′ = nPr ( 3 ), R = H, R′ = iPr ( 4 ), R = H, R′ = tBu ( 5 ), R = H, R′ = 1‐Ada ( 6 ), R = H, R′ = CPh₃ ( 7 ), R = H, R′ = Ph ( 8 ), R = H, RR′ = 2,6‐iPr₂Ph (= DIP) ( 10 ), R = H, R′ = 2,4,6‐Me₃Ph (= Mes) ( 11 ), R = H, R′ = 2,4,6‐tBu₃Ph (= Mes*)] ( 12 ), R = H, R′ = SiMe₃ ( 13 ), and R, R′ = SiMe₂Ph (1 4 ). ³¹P‐NMR spectra confirm that phosphaalkenes 2 – 7 and 10 – 14 are monomeric in solution; the structures of 7 , 10 , and 12 were determined by X‐ray crystallography. Freshly prepared (iPrMe₂Si)₂C=PN(H)Ph ( 8 ) is a monomer that dimerizes with (N→C) proton migration within several hours to the stable diazadiphosphetidine [(iPrMe₂Si)₂CHPNPh]₂ ( 9 ). NMR‐scale reactions of deprotonated 5 and 13 with tBuiPrPCl provide by P–P bond formation the P‐phosphanyl iminophosphoranes [(iPrMe₂Si)₂C=](RN=)PPtBu(iPr) [R = tBu ( 15 ), R = Me₃Si ( 17 )]. Deprotonated 5 and Me₃GeCl deliver by N–Ge bond formation the aminophosphaalkene (iPrMe₂Si)₂C=PN(tBu)GeMe₃ ( 20 ), which with elemental selenium 5 undergoes (N→C) proton migration to form the alkyl(imino)(seleno)phosphorane [(iPrMe₂Si)₂CH](tBuN=)P=Se ( 21 ), which is a selenium‐bridged cyclic dimer in the solid state.     

Bis(arylimido) Molybdenum(VI) Amidinate and Guanidinate Complexes; Molecular Structures of [(ArN)2MoMe{N(Cy)C[N(i‐Pr)2]N(Cy)}] (Ar = 2,6‐i‐Pr2C6H3; Cy = Cyclohexyl) and [(2,6‐i‐Pr2C6H3N)2MoCl2] · [NH=C(C6H5)CH(SiMe3)2]

The reaction of [(ArN)₂MoCl₂] · DME (Ar = 2,6‐i‐Pr₂C₆H₃) ( 1 ) with lithium amidinates or guanidinates resulted in molybdenum(VI) complexes [(ArN)₂MoCl{N(R¹)C(R²)N(R¹)}] (R¹ = Cy (cyclohexyl), R² = Me ( 2 ); R¹ = Cy, R² = N(i‐Pr)₂ ( 3 ); R¹ = Cy, R² = N(SiMe₃)₂ ( 4 ); R¹ = SiMe₃, R² = C₆H₅ ( 5 )) with five coordinated molybdenum atoms. Methylation of these compounds was exemplified by the reactions of 2 and 3 with MeLi affording the corresponding methylates [(ArN)₂MoMe{N(R¹)C(R²)N(R¹)}] (R¹ = Cy, R² = Me ( 6 ); R¹ = Cy, R² = N(i‐Pr)₂ ( 7 )). The analogous reaction of 1 with bulky [N(SiMe₃)C(C₆H₅)C(SiMe₃)₂]Li · THF did not give the corresponding metathesis product, but a Schiff base adduct [(ArN)₂MoCl₂] · [NH=C(C₆H₅)CH(SiMe₃)₂] ( 8 ) in low yield. The molecular structures of 7 and 8 are established by the X‐ray single crystal structural analysis.     

Hydroalumination and Hydrogallation Reactions with Tri(ethynyl)silanes – Generation of Compounds with up to Three Coordinatively Unsaturated Aluminium Atoms

Hydroalumination or hydrogallation of tri(ethynyl)silanes, RSi(C≡C‐Ar)₃ ( 1a , R = Ph, Ar = Ph; 1b , R = Me, Ar = Ph; 1c , R = Me, Ar = C₆H₄Me), with the element hydrides H‐EtBu₂ (E = Al, Ga) in stoichiometric ratios of 1:1 to 1:3 at ambient temperature yielded the addition products (PhC≡C)₂(R)Si[(tBu₂E)C=C(H)Ph] ( 2 , R = Ph, E = Ga; 3a , R = Me, E = Al; 3b , R = Me, E = Ga), (PhC≡C)(Me)Si[(tBu₂E)C=C(H)Ph]₂ ( 4a , E = Al, 4b , E = Ga) and (Me)Si[(tBu₂Al)C=C(H)Ar]₃ ( 5 , Ar = Ph; 6 , Ar = C₆H₄Me). Compounds 2 – 4 show a relatively close interaction between the coordinatively unsaturated aluminium or gallium atoms and one of the C_α(≡C) atoms of unreacted alkyne substituents [245 (E = Al) and 266 pm (E = Ga)] that stabilises the kinetically favoured cis addition products with E and hydrogen on the same side of the resulting C=C double bonds. In the absence of these stabilising effects the compounds were found to isomerise to the thermodynamically favoured trans isomers.     

Experimental and Computational Studies of the Molybdenum‐Flanking Arene Interaction in Quadruply Bonded Dimolybdenum Complexes with Terphenyl Ligands

To clarify the nature of the Mo?C_arene interaction in terphenyl complexes with quadruple Mo?Mo bonds, ether adducts of composition [Mo₂(Ar′)(I)(O₂CR)₂(OEt₂)] have been prepared and characterized (Ar′=Ar^Xyl₂, R=Me; Ar′=ArMes₂, R=Me; Ar′=Ar^Xyl2, R=CF₃) (Mes=mesityl; Xyl=2,6‐Me₂C₆H₃, from now on xylyl) and their reactivity toward different neutral Lewis bases investigated. PMe₃, P(OMe)₃ and PiPr₃ were chosen as P‐donors and the reactivity studies complemented with the use of the C‐donors CNXyl and CN₂C₂Me₄ (1,3,4,5‐tetramethylimidazol‐2‐ylidene). New compounds of general formula [Mo₂(Ar′)(I)(O₂CR)₂( L )] were obtained, except for the imidazol‐2‐ylidene ligand that yielded a salt‐like compound of composition [Mo₂(Ar^Xyl2)(O₂CMe)₂(CN₂C₂Me₄)₂]I. The Mo?C_arene interaction in these complexes has been analyzed with the aid of X‐ray data and computational studies. This interaction compensates the coordinative and electronic unsaturation of one of the Mo atoms in the above complexes, but it seems to be weak in terms of sharing of electron density between the Mo and C_arene atoms and appears to have no appreciable effect in the length of the Mo?Mo, Mo?X, and Mo? L bonds present in these molecules.     

From an Isolable Acyclic Phosphinosilylene Adduct to Donor‐Stabilized SiE Compounds (E=O,S, Se)

Reaction of the arylchlorosilylene‐NHC adduct ArSi(NHC)Cl [Ar=2,6‐Trip₂C₆H₃; NHC=(MeC)₂(NMe)₂C:] 1 with one molar equiv of lithium diphenylphosphanide affords the first stable NHC‐stabilized acyclic phosphinosilylene adduct 2 (ArSi(NHC)PPh₂), which could be structurally characterized. Compound 2 , when reacted with one molar equiv selenium and sulfur, affords the silanechalcogenones 4 a and 4 b (ArSi(NHC)(?E)PPh₂, 4 a : E=Se, 4 b : E=S), respectively. Conversion of 2 with an excess of Se and S, through additional insertion of one chalcogen atom into the Si?P bond, leads to 3 a and 3 b (ArSi(NHC)(?E)‐E‐P(?E)Ph₂, 3 a : E=Se, 3 b : E=S), respectively. Additionally, the exposure of 2 to N₂O or CO₂ yielded the isolable NHC‐stabilized silanone 4 c , Ar(NHC)(Ph₂P)Si?O.     

Imino‐Bridged Bisphosphaalkenes (2,4‐Diphospha‐3‐azapentadienes)

Deprotonation of aminophosphaalkenes (RMe₂Si)₂C?PN(H)(R′) (R=Me, iPr; R′=tBu, 1‐adamantyl (1‐Ada), 2,4,6‐tBu₃C₆H₂ (Mes*)) followed by reactions of the corresponding Li salts Li[(RMe₂Si)₂C?P(M)(R′)] with one equivalent of the corresponding P‐chlorophosphaalkenes (RMe₂Si)₂C?PCl provides bisphosphaalkenes (2,4‐diphospha‐3‐azapentadienes) [(RMe₂Si)₂C?P]₂NR′. The thermally unstable tert‐butyliminobisphosphaalkene [(Me₃Si)₂C?P]₂NtBu ( 4 a ) undergoes isomerisation reactions by Me₃Si‐group migration that lead to mixtures of four‐membered heterocyles, but in the presence of an excess amount of (Me₃Si)₂C?PCl, 4 a furnishes an azatriphosphabicyclohexene C₃(SiMe₃)₅P₃NtBu ( 5 ) that gave red single crystals. Compound 5 contains a diphosphirane ring condensed with an azatriphospholene system that exhibits an endocylic P?C double bond and an exocyclic ylidic P⁽⁺⁾? C^(?)(SiMe₃)₂ unit. Using the bulkier iPrMe₂Si substituents at three‐coordinated carbon leads to slightly enhanced thermal stability of 2,4‐diphospha‐3‐azapentadienes [(iPrMe₂Si)₂C?P]₂NR′ (R′=tBu: 4 b ; R′=1‐Ada: 8 ). According to a low‐temperature crystal‐structure determination, 8 adopts a non‐planar structure with two distinctly differently oriented P?C sites, but ³¹P NMR spectra in solution exhibit singlet signals. ³¹P NMR spectra also reveal that bulky Mes* groups (Mes*=2,4,6‐tBu₃C₆H₂) at the central imino function lead to mixtures of symmetric and unsymmetric rotamers, thus implying hindered rotation around the P? N bonds in persistent compounds [(RMe₂Si)₂C?P]₂NMes* ( 11 a , 11 b ). DFT calculations for the parent molecule [(H₃Si)₂C?P]₂NCH₃ suggest that the non‐planar distortion of compound 8 will have steric grounds.     

Synthesis,Bonding and Reactivity of a Terminal Titanium Alkylidene Hydrazido Compound

We report a detailed study of the reactions of the Ti?NNCPh₂ alkylidene hydrazide functional group in [Cp*Ti{MeC(NiPr)₂}(NNCPh₂)] ( 8 ) with a variety of unsaturated and saturated substrates. Compound 8 was prepared from [Cp*Ti{MeC(NiPr)₂}(NtBu)] and Ph₂CNNH₂. DFT calculations were used to determine the nature of the bonding for the Ti?NNCPh₂ moiety in 8 and in the previously reported [Cp₂Ti(NNCPh₂)(PMe₃)]. Reaction of 8 with CO₂ gave dimeric [(Cp*Ti{MeC(NiPr)₂}{μ‐OC(NNCPh₂)O})₂] and the “double‐insertion” dicarboxylate species [Cp*Ti‐{MeC(NiPr)₂}{OC(O)N(NCPh₂)C(O)O}] through an initial [2+2] cycloaddition product [Cp*Ti{MeC(NiPr)₂}{N(NCPh₂)C(O)O}], the congener of which could be isolated in the corresponding reaction with CS₂. The reaction with isocyanates or isothiocyanates tBuNCO or ArNCE (Ar=Tol or 2,6‐C₆H₃iPr₂; E=O, S) gave either complete NNCPh₂ transfer, [2+2] cycloaddition to Ti?N_α or single‐ or double‐substrate insertion into the Ti?N_α bond. The treatment of 8 with isonitriles RNC (R=tBu or Xyl) formed σ‐adducts [Cp*Ti{MeC(NiPr)₂}(NNCPh₂)(CNR)]. With Ar^F5CCH (Ar^F5=C₆F₅) the [2+2] cycloaddition product [Cp*Ti{MeC(NiPr)₂}{N(NCPh₂)C(Ar^F5)C(H)}] was formed, whereas with benzonitriles ArCN (Ar=Ph or Ar^F5) two equivalents of substrate were coupled in a head‐to‐tail manner across the Ti?N_α bond to form [Cp*Ti{MeC(NiPr)₂}{N(NCPh₂)C(Ar)NC(Ar)N}]. Treatment of 8 with RSiH₃ (R=aryl or Bu) or Ph₂SiH₂ gave [Cp*Ti{MeC(NiPr)₂}{N(SiHRR′)N(CHPh₂)}] (R′=H or Ph) through net 1,3‐addition of Si? H to the N? N?CPh₂ linkage of 8 , whereas reaction with PhSiH₂X (X=Cl, Br) led to the Ti?N_α 1,2‐addition products [Cp*Ti{MeC(NiPr)₂}(X){N(NCPh₂)SiH₂Ph}].     

Oxo(trisyl)boran (Me3Si)3C?BO als Zwischenstufe

Oxo(trisyl)borane (Me₃Si)₃C? B?O as an Intermediate The acyclic trisylboranes R? B(OSiMe₃)? Cl ( 4 a ) and R? B(OH)? H ( 5 a ) and the cyclic boranes (? RB? O? CO? CO? O? ) ( 1 a ) and (? RB? O? RB? O? SO₂? O? ) ( 6 a ) [R = (Me₃Si)₃C, “Trisyl”] are thermolyzed in the gasphase to give well-defined products. The tris(trisyl)boroxine (? RB? O? )₃ ( 2 a ) is formed from 4 a and 5 a at 140 and 160°C, respectively, besides Me₃SiCl and H₂, respectively, whereas the six-membered ring [? BMe? CH(SiMe₃)? SiMe₂? O? SiMe₂? CH₂? ] ( 8 ) is the product from 1 a and 6 a at 600 and 700°C, respectively, besides CO/CO₂ and SO₃, respectively. The oxoborane R? B?O is presumably a common intermediate. It is stabilized at the lower temperature by cyclotrimerization to give 2 and at the higher temperature by a sequence of several intramolecular steps: a 1,3-silyl shift along the chain C? B? O, an exchange of Me and Me₃SiO along the chain Si? C? B, and a C? H addition to the B?C double bond; the steps can be rationalized by analogous known reactions. The gas-phase thermolysis at 600°C of the dioxaboracyclohexenes (? BR? O? CR′ = CH? CRR′? O? ) ( 7 b? d ; R = Me, iPr, tBu; R′ = Me) yields the boroxines (RBO)₃ and the enones Me? CO? CH?CHR? Me; the cyclohexene 7 e (R = Me; R′ = CF₃) is not decomposed at 600°C.