Understanding the Affects of Audience on Mathemtaical Writing

This study formally explored how high school students addressed audience when they wrote mathematically. Student explicated the solving of a mathematics problem to their mathematics teacher and their English teacher. This study showed that students did change the style and language of their mathematical writing as their audience changed. It adds knowledge and support to current ideas of teacher presentation during routine daily instruction. Also included are implications this information may have on mathematics education.     

The Effects of Non‐CAS Graphing Calculators on Student Achievement and Attitude Levels in Mathematics: A Meta‐Analysis

Forty‐two studies comparing students with access to graphing calculators during instruction to students who did not have access to graphing calculators during instruction are the subject of this meta‐analysis. The results on the achievement and attitude levels of students are presented. The studies evaluated cover middle and high school mathematics courses, as well as college courses through first semester calculus. When calculators were part of instruction but not testing, students' benefited from using calculators while developing the skills necessary to understand mathematics concepts. When calculators were included in testing and instruction, the procedural, conceptual, and overall achievement skills of students improved.     

How young students communicate their mathematical problem solving in writing

This study investigates young students’ writing in connection to mathematical problem solving. Students’ written communication has traditionally been used by mathematics teachers in the assessment of students’ mathematical knowledge. This study rests on the notion that this writing represents a particular activity which requires a complex set of resources. In order to help students develop their writing, teachers need to have a thorough knowledge of mathematical writing and its distinctive features. The study aims to add to the body of knowledge about writing in school mathematics by investigating young students’ mathematical writing from a communicational, rather than mathematical, perspective. A basic inventory of the communicational choices, that are identifiable across a sample of 519 mathematical texts, produced by 9–12 year old students, is created. The texts have been analysed with multimodal discourse analysis, and the findings suggest diversity in students’ use of images, words, numerals, symbols and layout to organize their texts and to represent their problem-solving process along with an answer to the problem. The inventory and the indication that students have different ideas on how, what, for whom and why they should be writing, can be used by teachers to initiate discussions of what may constitute good communication.     

Spatial visualization and measurement of area: A case study in spatialized mathematics instruction

The purpose of this study was to explore the influence of spatial visualization skills when students solve area tasks. Spatial visualization is closely related to mathematics achievement, but little is known about how these skills link to task success. We examined middle school students’ representations and solutions to area problems (both non-metric and metric) through qualitative and quantitative task analysis. Task solutions were analyzed as a function of spatial visualization skills and links were made between student solutions on tasks with different goals (i.e., non-metric and metric). Findings suggest that strong spatial visualizers solved the tasks with relative ease, with evidence for conceptual and procedural understanding. By contrast, Low and Average Spatial students more frequently produced errors due to failure to correctly determine linear measurements or apply appropriate formula, despite adequate procedural knowledge. A novel finding was the facilitating role of spatial skills in the link between metric task representation and success in determining a solution. From a teaching and learning perspective, these results highlight the need to connect emergent spatial skills with mathematical content and support students to develop conceptual understanding in parallel with procedural competence.     

The Value of Trade Books in Secondary Science and Mathematics Instruction: A Rationale

A rationale for the inclusion of trade books (i.e., fiction, nonfiction, biographies, autobiographies, reports of discoveries, poetry, science fiction) is offered to secondary science and mathematics instructors. The benefits of trade books include context for problem posing and solving while promoting constructivist-based instruction. Trade books provide students with vicarious experiences of the science and mathematics process, as they afford young people introductions to people and ideas which they may not know otherwise. Trade books promote positive attitudes toward science and mathematics instruction because they present a distinctive point of view and celebrate diversity of achievement. Trade books contain the ingredients necessary for emotional growth: romance, wonder and awe. In addition, trade books foster students' literacy development, since students are likely to conduct personalized inquiry, monitor their thinking and spend more time actively engaged in reading due to the variety and appeal of trade books. Importantly, teacher and student responses show reflection and ownership when trade books are used during instruction. Examples of books and quotes are included.     

Writing as a Tool to Demonstrate Mathematical Understanding

In this study, I examine how using a writers' workshop model in mathematics creates a space for students to write about their mathematical thinking and problem solving and how their writing impacts instruction. This case study of one classroom with one teacher spanned 6 weeks and included 18 implementations of an adapted version of the Writers' Workshop (WW) in a fourth‐grade mathematics class. On a biweekly basis, the data were reviewed and changes made to the model. The analysis of the students' writing revealed (a) their understandings and misunderstandings of the mathematical content, (b) their readiness for more challenging tasks, and (c) their connections to prior knowledge. Students used writing to demonstrate their understanding of mathematics and show their mathematical processes. In some cases, examining only the numerical work failed to illuminate the students' understanding, their writing provided deeper insight. Students recognized writing as a tool for learning; this was evident in interview responses.     

Web‐Based Instruction on Preservice Teachers' Knowledge of Fraction Operations

This study determines whether web‐based instruction (WBI) represents an improved method for helping preservice teachers learn procedural and conceptual knowledge of fractions.. The purpose was to compare the effectiveness of web‐based instruction (WBI) with the traditional lecture in mathematics content and methods for the elementary school course. The results of this study suggest that the use of WBI in learning fractions is more effective. When compared with the traditional instruction, the WBI treatment results were significantly more effective for procedural and conceptual knowledge of fraction operations.     

Comparing German and Taiwanese secondary school students’ knowledge in solving mathematical modelling tasks requiring their assumptions

Mathematization is critical in providing students with challenges for solving modelling tasks. Inadequate assumptions in a modelling task lead to an inadequate situational model, and to an inadequate mathematical model for the problem situation. However, the role of assumptions in solving modelling problems has been investigated only rarely. In this study, we intentionally designed two types of assumptions in two modelling tasks, namely, one task that requires non-numerical assumptions only and another that requires both non-numerical and numerical assumptions. Moreover, conceptual knowledge and procedural knowledge are also two factors influencing students’ modelling performance. However, current studies comparing modelling performance between Western and non-Western students do not consider the differences in students’ knowledge. This gap in research intrigued us and prompted us to investigate whether Taiwanese students can still perform better than German students if students’ mathematical knowledge in solving modelling tasks is differentiated. The results of our study showed that the Taiwanese students had significantly higher mathematical knowledge than did the German students with regard to either conceptual knowledge or procedural knowledge. However, if students of both countries were on the same level of mathematical knowledge, the German students were found to have higher modelling performance compared to the Taiwanese students in solving the same modelling tasks, whether such tasks required non-numerical assumptions only, or both non-numerical and numerical assumptions. This study provides evidence that making assumptions is a strength of German students compared to Taiwanese students. Our findings imply that Western mathematics education may be more effective in improving students’ ability to solve holistic modelling problems.     

Parents’ Attitudes Toward Mathematics and the Influence on Their Students’ Attitudes toward Mathematics: A Quantitative Study

The purpose of this study was to investigate parents’ attitudes toward mathematics, their students' attitude toward mathematics, and the influence of the parents’ attitude on the students' attitude toward mathematics. Data analyses revealed statistically significant positive correlations between parents’ and students’ attitudes toward mathematics. Additionally, parents’ mathematics attitude significantly predicted students’ attitudes toward mathematics (n=146). By understanding the influence of parents’ attitudes on students’ attitudes toward mathematics, school efforts can be geared toward fostering favorable attitudes toward mathematics among parents.     

Content Knowledge,Attitudes, and Self‐Efficacy in the Mathematics New York City Teaching Fellows (NYCTF) Program

The purpose of this study was to understand the mathematical content knowledge new teachers have both before and after taking a mathematics methods course in the NYCTF program. Further, the purpose was to understand the attitudes toward mathematics and concepts of self‐efficacy that Teaching Fellows had over the course of the semester. The sample included 42 new Teaching Fellows who were given a mathematics content test, attitudes toward mathematics questionnaire, and teaching self‐efficacy questionnaire at the beginning and end of the semester. Further, the teachers kept teaching and learning journals. Findings revealed a significant increase in both mathematical content knowledge and positive attitudes toward mathematics. Additionally, Teaching Fellows were found to have positive attitudes and high self‐efficacy at the end of the semester, and relationships were found between attitudes and self‐efficacy. Finally, Teaching Fellows generally found that classroom management was the biggest issue in their teaching, and that problem solving and numeracy were the most important topics addressed in their learning. Future studies should address self‐efficacy differences between preservice and in‐service teachers and the effects of alternative certification teacher knowledge, attitudes toward mathematics, and self‐efficacy on students in the classroom.     

Promoting Equity in Secondary Science and Mathematics Classrooms With Biography Projects

Teachers have been called upon to give their students the opportunity to consider the perspectives of diverse individuals across the science and mathematics curriculum. This is because inclusion enhances motivation and achievement. Biographies provide context for construction of knowledge, vicarious experiences, positive attitudes toward instruction, and literacy enhancement. The purpose of this paper is to provide a rationale for including biography projects representing diverse contributors to science and mathematics, describe a biography project assignment used in a methods course for secondary teacher preparation, provide preservice teachers' comments about the assignment, and make connections to current research about equitable instruction.     

Analogies and Reconstruction of Probability Knowledge

The effectiveness of utilizing analogies to effect conceptual change in students' alternative probability concepts was investigated. Forty-one senior high school mathematics students were engaged in a knowledge reconstruction process regarding their beliefs about common everyday probability situations, such as sports events or lotteries. The students were given situations similar to those shown in previous research to reveal alternative mathematical conceptions. They were also given analogous researcher-generated anchoring situations that had been pretested and found to elicit mathematically acceptable responses. The cognitive dissonance produced by the conflicting responses motivated students to reconstruct their knowledge. The results of the investigation showed that analogies can be effective in producing a desired conceptual change in high school students' probability concepts.     

High school students’ understanding of the function concept

This paper is a study of part of the Algebra Project's program for underrepresented high school students from the lowest quartile of academic achievement, social and economic status. The study focuses on students’ learning the concept of function. The curriculum and pedagogy are part of an innovative, experimental approach designed and implemented by the Algebra Project. The instructional treatment took place over 7 weeks during the Junior Year of 15 students from our target population. Immediately after instruction, a written instrument was administered followed, several weeks later, by in-depth interviews. The results are that many of our participants achieved a level of knowledge and understanding of functions on a par with beginning college students, including preservice teachers, as reported in the literature. Many conceptual difficulties that have been reported in the research literature were not as prevalent for our participants and some of them were capable of solving difficult problems involving composition of functions. We conclude that, with appropriate pedagogy, it is possible for students in the Algebra Project's target population to learn substantial and non-trivial mathematics at the high school level, and that the Algebra Project approach is one example of such a pedagogy.     

Enhancing pre-service teachers’ fraction knowledge through open approach instruction

This study explores whether using the open approach instruction in teaching mathematics has a positive effect for enhancing pre-service teachers’ fraction knowledge. The test consisted of 32 items that were designed to examine pre-service teachers’ procedural and conceptual knowledge of fractions before and after receiving open approach instruction. The study was undertaken among students in four mathematics content and methods courses for the Elementary School Education program in a mid-western public university. The findings show that most of the teachers achieved improved learning outcomes through the open approach instruction.     

Students’ and Teachers’ Conceptual Metaphors for Mathematical Problem Solving

Metaphors are regularly used by mathematics teachers to relate difficult or complex concepts in classrooms. A complex topic of concern in mathematics education, and most STEM‐based education classes, is problem solving. This study identified how students and teachers contextualize mathematical problem solving through their choice of metaphors. Twenty‐two high‐school student and six teacher interviews demonstrated a rich foundation for these shared experiences by identifying the conceptual metaphors. This mixed‐methods approach qualitatively identified conceptual metaphors via interpretive phenomenology and then quantitatively analyzed the frequency and popularity of the metaphors to explore whether a coherent metaphorical system exists with teachers and students. This study identified the existence of a set of metaphors that describe how multiple classrooms of geometry students and teachers make sense of mathematical problem solving. Moreover, this study determined that the most popular metaphors for problem solving were shared by both students and teachers. The existence of a coherent set of metaphors for problem solving creates a discursive space for teachers to converse with students about problem solving concretely. Moreover, the methodology provides a means to address other complex concepts in STEM education fields that revolve around experiential understanding.     

Special Issue Article: Preparing for the 21st Century: The Status of Quantitative Literacy in the United States

This article articulates and operationalizes a framework for investigating the level of quantitative literacy in the United States. Quantitative literacy is defined in terms of mathematical content knowledge, mathematical reasoning, understanding of the social impact and utility of mathematics, understanding the nature and historical development of mathematics, and mathematical disposition‐Data from the Third International Mathematics and Science Study are used to document the level of quantitative literacy in the US. Results suggest that, although students in the US seem to possess an awareness of the usefulness of mathematics and have positive dispositions toward mathematics, they fall short in their understanding of the nature of mathematics and an ability to apply their content knowledge to everyday situations. Suggestions for curriculum and instruction that align with the framework for promoting quantitative literacy are offered.     

Are beginning calculus and engineering students adequately prepared for higher education? An assessment of students’ basic mathematical knowledge

Are students transitioning from the secondary level to university studies in mathematics and engineering adequately prepared for education at the tertiary level? In this study, we discuss the prior mathematical knowledge and skills demonstrated by Norwegian engineering (N?=?1537) and calculus (N?=?626) university students by using data from a mathematics assessment administered by the Norwegian Mathematical Council. The assessment examines students’ conceptual understanding, computation skills and problem solving skills on the basis of the mathematics curriculum of lower secondary education. We found that calculus students significantly outperformed engineering students, but both student groups struggled to solve the test, with the calculus and engineering groups scoring an average of 60% and 46%, respectively. Beginning students who fail to master basic skills, such as solving arithmetic and algebra problems, will most likely face difficulties in their further courses. Although few female students enrol in calculus and engineering programmes compared with male ones and are thus underrepresented, male and female students at the same ability level achieved comparable test scores. Furthermore, students reported high levels of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, and a positive relationship was observed between intrinsic motivation and achievement.     

Korean and American Elementary School Teachers' Beliefs about Mathematics Problem Solving

Elementary school teachers in South Korea and the United States completed a beliefs and practices questionnaire pertaining to mathematical problem-solving instruction. Although both groups of teachers shared a general approach to teaching with a focus on problem-solving strategies, many differences were apparent. Korean teachers rated themselves and their students higher in problem-solving ability than American teachers. Korean teachers perceived their mathematics textbook as a more valuable source for problem-solving instruction and word problems. Korean teachers more strongly agreed that students should know the key-word approach for solving problems. American teachers reported more frequent use of calculators, manipulatives, and small group instruction. The results indicate that American teachers may more often use instructional techniques that are aligned with current recommendations for mathematics instruction.     

Identifying authority structures in mathematics classroom discourse: a case of a teacher’s early experience in a new context

We explore a conceptual frame for analyzing mathematics classroom discourse to understand the way authority is at work. This case study of a teacher moving from a school where he is known to a new setting offers us the opportunity to explore the use of the conceptual frame as a tool for understanding how language practice and authority relate in a mathematics classroom. This case study illuminates the challenges of establishing disciplinary authority in a new context while also developing the students’ sense of authority within the discipline. To analyze the communication in the teacher’s grade 12 class in the first school and grade 9 class early in the year at the new school, we use the four categories of positioning drawn from our earlier analysis of pervasive language patterns in mathematics classrooms—personal authority, discourse as authority, discursive inevitability, and personal latitude.