Annealing-tabu PAES: a multi-objective hybrid meta-heuristic

Most real-life optimization problems require taking into account not one, but multiple objectives simultaneously. In most cases these objectives are in conflict, i.e. the improvement of some objectives implies the deterioration of others. In single-objective optimization there exists a global optimum, while in the multi-objective case no optimal solution is clearly defined, but rather a set of solutions. In the last decade most papers dealing with multi-objective optimization use the concept of Pareto-optimality. The goal of Pareto-based multi-objective strategies is to generate a front (set) of non-dominated solutions as an approximation to the true Pareto-optimal front. However, this front is unknown for problems with large and highly complex search spaces, which is why meta-heuristic methods have become important tools for solving this kind of problem. Hybridization in the multi-objective context is nowadays an open research area. This article presents a novel extension of the well-known Pareto archived evolution strategy (PAES) which combines simulated annealing and tabu search. Experiments on several mathematical problems show that this hybridization allows an improvement in the quality of the non-dominated solutions in comparison with PAES, and also with its extension M-PAES.     

Omni-optimizer: A generic evolutionary algorithm for single and multi-objective optimization

Due to the vagaries of optimization problems encountered in practice, users resort to different algorithms for solving different optimization problems. In this paper, we suggest and evaluate an optimization procedure which specializes in solving a wide variety of optimization problems. The proposed algorithm is designed as a generic multi-objective, multi-optima optimizer. Care has been taken while designing the algorithm such that it automatically degenerates to efficient algorithms for solving other simpler optimization problems, such as single-objective uni-optimal problems, single-objective multi-optima problems and multi-objective uni-optimal problems. The efficacy of the proposed algorithm in solving various problems is demonstrated on a number of test problems chosen from the literature. Because of its efficiency in handling different types of problems with equal ease, this algorithm should find increasing use in real-world optimization problems.     

Branch and probability bound methods in multi-objective optimization

An approach to non-convex multi-objective optimization problems is considered where only the values of objective functions are required by the algorithm. The proposed approach is a generalization of the probabilistic branch-and-bound approach well applicable to complicated problems of single-objective global optimization. In the present paper the concept of probabilistic branch-and-bound based multi-objective optimization algorithms is discussed, and some illustrations are presented.     

A hybrid method for solving multi-objective global optimization problems

Real optimization problems often involve not one, but multiple objectives, usually in conflict. In single-objective optimization there exists a global optimum, while in the multi-objective case no optimal solution is clearly defined but rather a set of optimums, which constitute the so called Pareto-optimal front. Thus, the goal of multi-objective strategies is to generate a set of non-dominated solutions as an approximation to this front. However, most problems of this kind cannot be solved exactly because they have very large and highly complex search spaces. The objective of this work is to compare the performance of a new hybrid method here proposed, with several well-known multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEA). The main attraction of these methods is the integration of selection and diversity maintenance. Since it is very difficult to describe exactly what a good approximation is in terms of a number of criteria, the performance is quantified with adequate metrics that evaluate the proximity to the global Pareto-front. In addition, this work is also one of the few empirical studies that solves three-objective optimization problems using the concept of global Pareto-optimality.     

Nonlinear goal programming using multi-objective genetic algorithms

Goal programming is a technique often used in engineering design activities primarily to find a compromised solution which will simultaneously satisfy a number of design goals. In solving goal programming problems, classical methods reduce the multiple goal-attainment problem into a single objective of minimizing a weighted sum of deviations from goals. This procedure has a number of known difficulties. First, the obtained solution to the goal programming problem is sensitive to the chosen weight vector. Second, the conversion to a single-objective optimization problem involves additional constraints. Third, since most real-world goal programming problems involve nonlinear criterion functions, the resulting single-objective optimization problem becomes a nonlinear programming problem, which is difficult to solve using classical optimization methods. In tackling nonlinear goal programming problems, although successive linearization techniques have been suggested, they are found to be sensitive to the chosen starting solution. In this paper, we pose the goal programming problem as a multi-objective optimization problem of minimizing deviations from individual goals and then suggest an evolutionary optimization algorithm to find multiple Pareto-optimal solutions of the resulting multi-objective optimization problem. The proposed approach alleviates all the above difficulties. It does not need any weight vector. It eliminates the need of having extra constraints needed with the classical formulations. The proposed approach is also suitable for solving goal programming problems having nonlinear criterion functions and having a non-convex trade-off region. The efficacy of the proposed approach is demonstrated by solving a number of nonlinear goal programming test problems and an engineering design problem. In all problems, multiple solutions (each corresponding to a different weight vector) to the goal programming problem are found in one single simulation run. The results suggest that the proposed approach is an effective and practical tool for solving real-world goal programming problems.     

Parallelization of population-based multi-objective meta-heuristics: An empirical study

In single-objective optimization it is possible to find a global optimum, while in the multi-objective case no optimal solution is clearly defined, but several that simultaneously optimize all the objectives. However, the majority of this kind of problems cannot be solved exactly as they have very large and highly complex search spaces. Recently, meta-heuristic approaches have become important tools for solving multi-objective problems encountered in industry as well as in the theoretical field. Most of these meta-heuristics use a population of solutions, and hence the runtime increases when the population size grows. An interesting way to overcome this problem is to apply parallel processing. This paper analyzes the performance of several parallel paradigms in the context of population-based multi-objective meta-heuristics. In particular, we evaluate four alternative parallelizations of the Pareto simulated annealing algorithm, in terms of quality of the solutions, and speedup.     

A Hybrid Meta-Heuristic for Multi-Objective Optimization: MOSATS

Real optimization problems often involve not one, but multiple objectives, usually in conflict. In single-objective optimization there exists a global optimum, while in the multi-objective case no optimal solution is clearly defined but rather a set of solutions, called the Pareto-optimal front. Thus, the goal of multi-objective strategies is to generate a set of non-dominated solutions as an approximation to this front. However, the majority of problems of this kind cannot be solved exactly because they have very large and highly complex search spaces. In recent years, meta-heuristics have become important tools for solving multi-objective problems encountered in industry as well as in the theoretical field. This paper presents a novel approach based on hybridizing Simulated Annealing and Tabu Search. Experiments on the Graph Partitioning Problem show that this new method is a better tool for approximating the efficient set than other strategies also based on these meta-heuristics.     

Minmax robustness for multi-objective optimization problems

In real-world applications of optimization, optimal solutions are often of limited value, because disturbances of or changes to input data may diminish the quality of an optimal solution or even render it infeasible. One way to deal with uncertain input data is robust optimization, the aim of which is to find solutions which remain feasible and of good quality for all possible scenarios, i.e., realizations of the uncertain data. For single objective optimization, several definitions of robustness have been thoroughly analyzed and robust optimization methods have been developed. In this paper, we extend the concept of minmax robustness (Ben-Tal, Ghaoui, & Nemirovski, 2009) to multi-objective optimization and call this extension robust efficiency for uncertain multi-objective optimization problems. We use ingredients from robust (single objective) and (deterministic) multi-objective optimization to gain insight into the new area of robust multi-objective optimization. We analyze the new concept and discuss how robust solutions of multi-objective optimization problems may be computed. To this end, we use techniques from both robust (single objective) and (deterministic) multi-objective optimization. The new concepts are illustrated with some linear and quadratic programming instances.     

Utilizing expected improvement and generalized data envelopment analysis in multi-objective genetic algorithms

Meta-heuristic methods such as genetic algorithms (GA) and particle swarm optimization (PSO) have been extended to multi-objective optimization problems, and have been observed to be useful for finding good approximate Pareto optimal solutions. In order to improve the convergence and the diversity in the search of solutions using meta-heuristic methods, this paper suggests a new method to make offspring by utilizing the expected improvement (EI) and generalized data envelopment analysis (GDEA). In addition, the effectiveness of the proposed method will be investigated through several numerical examples in comparison with the conventional multi-objective GA and PSO methods.     

Assessing mutual funds’ corporate social responsibility: a multistakeholder-AHP based methodology

Currently, stochastic optimization on the one hand and multi-objective optimization on the other hand are rich and well-established special fields of Operations Research. Much less developed, however, is their intersection: the analysis of decision problems involving multiple objectives and stochastically represented uncertainty simultaneously. This is amazing, since in economic and managerial applications, the features of multiple decision criteria and uncertainty are very frequently co-occurring. Part of the existing quantitative approaches to deal with problems of this class apply scalarization techniques in order to reduce a given stochastic multi-objective problem to a stochastic single-objective one. The present article gives an overview over a second strand of the recent literature, namely methods that preserve the multi-objective nature of the problem during the computational analysis. We survey publications assuming a risk-neutral decision maker, but also articles addressing the situation where the decision maker is risk-averse. In the second case, modern risk measures play a prominent role, and generalizations of stochastic orders from the univariate to the multivariate case have recently turned out as a promising methodological tool. Modeling questions as well as issues of computational solution are discussed.     

Transfer weight functions for injecting problem information in the multi-objective CMA-ES

The covariance matrix adaptation evolution strategy (CMA-ES) is one of the state-of-the-art evolutionary algorithms for optimization problems with continuous representation. It has been extensively applied to single-objective optimization problems, and different variants of CMA-ES have also been proposed for multi-objective optimization problems (MOPs). When applied to MOPs, the traditional steps of CMA-ES have to be modified to accommodate for multiple objectives. This fact is particularly evident when the number of objectives is higher than 3 and, with a high probability, all the solutions produced become non-dominated. An open question is to what extent information about the objective values of the non-dominated solutions can be injected in the CMA-ES model for a more effective search. In this paper, we investigate this general question using several metrics that describe the quality of the solutions already evaluated, different transfer weight functions, and a set of difficult benchmark instances including many-objective problems. We introduce a number of new strategies that modify how the probabilistic model is learned in CMA-ES. By conducting an exhaustive empirical analysis on two difficult benchmarks of many-objective functions we show that the proposed strategies to infuse information about the quality indicators into the learned models can achieve consistent improvements in the quality of the Pareto fronts obtained and enhance the convergence rate of the algorithm. Moreover, we conducted a comparison with a state-of-the-art algorithm from the literature, and achieved competitive results in problems with irregular Pareto fronts.     

Multiobjective GRASP with Path Relinking

In this paper we review and propose different adaptations of the GRASP metaheuristic to solve multiobjective combinatorial optimization problems. In particular, we describe several alternatives to specialize the construction and improvement components of GRASP when two or more objectives are considered. GRASP has been successfully coupled with Path Relinking for single-objective optimization. Moreover, we propose different hybridizations of GRASP and Path Relinking for multiobjective optimization. We apply the proposed GRASP with Path Relinking variants to two combinatorial optimization problems, the biobjective orienteering problem and the biobjective path dissimilarity problem. We report on empirical tests with 70 instances and 30 algorithms, that show that the proposed heuristics are competitive with the state-of-the-art methods for these problems.     

Single- and Multi-Objective Cooperation for the Flexible Docking Problem

In this article, the impact of single-objective methods as intensification factors in a multi-objective approach is presented for the flexible docking problem. Based on a novel tri-objective model, a parallel multi-objective genetic algorithm has been designed. However, due to the high variability of the energy objective, intensification methods focused on this objective have been also included in order to improve the convergence speed of the genetic algorithm and the quality of the results. The corresponding approach, combining single- and multi-objective methods, has been proved efficient according to the tested instances and the quality criterion used.     

Generation of efficient frontiers in multi-objective optimization problems by generalized data envelopment analysis

In many practical problems such as engineering design problems, criteria functions cannot be given explicitly in terms of design variables. Under this circumstance, values of criteria functions for given values of design variables are usually obtained by some analyses such as structural analysis, thermodynamical analysis or fluid mechanical analysis. These analyses require considerably much computation time. Therefore, it is not unrealistic to apply existing interactive optimization methods to those problems. On the other hand, there have been many trials using genetic algorithms (GA) for generating efficient frontiers in multi-objective optimization problems. This approach is effective in problems with two or three objective functions. However, these methods cannot usually provide a good approximation to the exact efficient frontiers within a small number of generations in spite of our time limitation. The present paper proposes a method combining generalized data envelopment analysis (GDEA) and GA for generating efficient frontiers in multi-objective optimization problems. GDEA removes dominated design alternatives faster than methods based on only GA. The proposed method can yield desirable efficient frontiers even in non-convex problems as well as convex problems. The effectiveness of the proposed method will be shown through several numerical examples.     

A hybrid approach combining interior-point and branch-and-bound methods applied to the problem of sugar cane waste

This paper proposes a hybrid approach for solving the multi-objective model related to the minimisation of sugar cane waste collection costs and/or the maximisation of produced energy by this waste, with the aid of strategies for solving multi-objective problems, which transform the problem into a set of single-objective problems. This approach combines the predictor-corrector primal-dual interior-point and branch-and-bound methods in order to solve these single-objective problems. The model consists in identifying the sugar cane varieties with the lowest waste collection costs, while simultaneously it aims to obtain the greatest amount of produced energy by this waste. The hybrid methods are implemented in C++ programming language, and tests are performed to determine the efficient solutions in Pareto optimal sense of the multi-objective model and compare the performance of the hybrid method using the integrality test and without considering it. The mathematical results confirm that the proposed hybrid method for solving the aforementioned models presents good computational performance and reliable solutions.     

Subset simulation for multi-objective optimization

Subset simulation is an efficient Monte Carlo technique originally developed for structural reliability problems, and further modified to solve single-objective optimization problems based on the idea that an extreme event (optimization problem) can be considered as a rare event (reliability problem). In this paper subset simulation is extended to solve multi-objective optimization problems by taking advantages of Markov Chain Monte Carlo and a simple evolutionary strategy. In the optimization process, a non-dominated sorting algorithm is introduced to judge the priority of each sample and handle the constraints. To improve the diversification of samples, a reordering strategy is proposed. A Pareto set can be generated after limited iterations by combining the two sorting algorithms together. Eight numerical multi-objective optimization benchmark problems are solved to demonstrate the efficiency and robustness of the proposed algorithm. A parametric study on the sample size in a simulation level and the proportion of seed samples is performed to investigate the performance of the proposed algorithm. Comparisons are made with three existing algorithms. Finally, the proposed algorithm is applied to the conceptual design optimization of a civil jet.     

多目标决策问题及其求解方法研究

针对多目标决策问题的多目标最优化问题化为单目标最优化问题进行了研究.其主要方法有:理想点法、等级权重法、加权算术平均法、加权几何平均法、风险偏好系数法、乘除法、模糊规划法等.此外,还对多目标最大最小和多目标最小最大决策问题进行了处理.     

Barzilai and Borwein’s method for multiobjective optimization problems

The present study is an attempt to extend Barzilai and Borwein’s method for dealing with unconstrained single objective optimization problems to multiobjective ones. As compared with Newton, Quasi-Newton and steepest descent multi-objective optimization methods, Barzilai and Borwein multiobjective optimization (BBMO) method requires simple and quick calculations in that it makes no use of the line search methods like the Armijo rule that necessitates function evaluations at each iteration. It goes without saying that the innovative aspect of the current study is due to the use of no function evaluations in comparison with other multi-objective optimization non-parametric methods (e.g. Newton, Quasi-Newton and steepest descent methods, to name a few) that have been investigated so far. Also, the convergence of the BBMO method for the objective functions assumed to be twice continuously differentiable has been proved. MATLAB software was utilized to implement the BBMO method, and the results were compared with the other methods mentioned earlier. Using some performance assessment, the quality of nondominated frontier of BBMO was analogized to above mentioned methods. In addition, the approximate nondominated frontiers gained from the methods were compared with the exact nondominated frontier for some problems. Also, performance profiles are considered to visualize numerical results presented in tables.     

Multi-strategy ensemble evolutionary algorithm for dynamic multi-objective optimization

Dynamic optimization and multi-objective optimization have separately gained increasing attention from the research community during the last decade. However, few studies have been reported on dynamic multi-objective optimization (dMO) and scarce effective dMO methods have been proposed. In this paper, we fulfill these gabs by developing new dMO test problems and new effective dMO algorithm. In the newly designed dMO problems, Pareto-optimal decision values (i.e., Pareto-optimal solutions: POS) or both POS and Pareto-optimal objective values (i.e., Pareto-optimal front: POF) change with time. A new multi-strategy ensemble multi-objective evolutionary algorithm (MS-MOEA) is proposed to tackle the challenges of dMO. In MS-MOEA, the convergence speed is accelerated by the new offspring creating mechanism powered by adaptive genetic and differential operators (GDM); a Gaussian mutation operator is employed to cope with premature convergence; a memory like strategy is proposed to achieve better starting population when a change takes place. In order to show the advantages of the proposed algorithm, we experimentally compare MS-MOEA with several algorithms equipped with traditional restart strategy. It is suggested that such a multi-strategy ensemble approach is promising for dealing with dMO problems.     

The development of a multi-objective Tabu Search algorithm for continuous optimisation problems

While there have been many adaptations of some of the more popular meta-heuristics for continuous multi-objective optimisation problems, Tabu Search has received relatively little attention, despite its suitability and effectiveness on a number of real-world design optimisation problems. In this paper we present an adaptation of a single-objective Tabu Search algorithm for multiple objectives. Further, inspired by path relinking strategies common in discrete optimisation problems, we enhance our algorithm to allow it to handle problems with large numbers of design variables. This is achieved by a novel parameter selection strategy that, unlike a full parametric analysis, avoids the use of objective function evaluations, thus keeping the overall computational cost of the procedure to a minimum. We assess the performance of our two Tabu Search variants on a range of standard test functions and compare it to a leading multi-objective Genetic Algorithm, NSGA-II. The path relinking-inspired parameter selection scheme gives a clear performance improvement over the basic multi-objective Tabu Search adaptation and both variants perform comparably with the NSGA-II.