trans‐Di­chloro­tetrakis(4‐methylpyrimidine‐N1)­ruthenium(II)

The title compound, trans‐[Ru^IICl₂(N¹‐mepym)₄] (mepym is 4‐methylpyrimidine, C₅H₆N₂), obtained from the reaction of trans,cis,cis‐[Ru^IICl₂(N¹‐mepym)₂(SbPh₃)₂] (Ph is phenyl) with excess mepym in ethanol, has fourfold crystallographic symmetry and has the four pyrimidine bases coordinated through N¹ and arranged in a propeller‐like orientation. The Ru—N and Ru—Cl bond distances are 2.082 (2) and 2.400 (4) Å, respectively. The methyl group, and the N³ and Cl atoms are involved in intermolecular C—H?N and C—­H?Cl hydrogen‐bond interactions.     

Nitrosyltechnetium(I) Complexes with 2‐(Diphenylphosphanyl)aniline

[Tc^I(NO)Cl(H₂L1)₂]⁺ cations (H₂L1 = 2‐(diphenylphosphanyl)aniline) are formed during reactions of H₂L1 with (NBu₄)[Tc(NO)Cl₄(MeOH)] or (NH₄)TcO₄/HCl/NH₂OH mixtures. Different isomers were isolated depending on the counterions and solvents used. The technetium(I) complexes cis‐NO,Cl,trans‐P,P‐[Tc^I(NO)Cl(H₂L1)₂]Cl, trans‐NO,Cl,cis‐P,P‐[Tc^I(NO)Cl(H₂L1)₂]₂(TcCl₆), and trans‐NO,Cl,trans‐P,P‐[Tc^I(NO)Cl(H₂L1)₂](PF₆) were isolated in crystalline form and studied by spectroscopic methods and X‐ray crystallography. DFT calculations show that there are only minor energy differences between the three isomers and the formation of the individual compounds is most probably strongly influenced by interactions with solvents and counterions.     

Unidimensional Self‐assembling of {HgII[NNN(PhBr)2]2} through Metal‐η4‐arene π‐Interactions: Synthesis and X‐Ray Characterization of a Bis Diaryl Symmetric‐substituted Triazenide Complex Polymer of Mercury(II)

A solution of deprotonated 1,3‐bis(4‐bromophenyl)triazene reacts with Hg(CH₃COO)₂ in methanol / tetrahydrofurane to give yellow crystalline needles of {Hg^II[NNN(PhBr)₂]₂}_n, a triazenide complex polymer of Hg^II with metal‐η²,η²‐arene π‐interactions, performed by coordinated single triazenide chains. The crystal structure of the new polymeric complex of Hg^II belongs to the monoclinic space group P2₁/n. The lattice of [Hg^II(BrPhNNNPhBr)₂]_n can be viewed as a one‐dimensional assembling of planar tectons [Hg^II(BrPhNNNPhBr)₂] linked through metalocene alike Hg^II‐η²,η²‐arene π‐interactions along the crystallographic b axis.     

3‐(Pyridin‐4‐yl)acetylacetone: CdII and HgII compete for nitrogen coordination

3‐(Pyridin‐4‐yl)acetylacetone (HacacPy) acts as a pyridine‐type ligand towards Cd^II and Hg^II halides. With CdBr₂, the one‐dimensional polymer [Cd(μ‐Br)₂(HacacPy)Cd(μ‐Br)₂(HacacPy)₂]_∞ is obtained in which five‐ and six‐coordinated Cd^II cations alternate in the chain direction. Reaction of HacacPy with HgBr₂ results in [Hg(μ‐Br)Br(HacacPy)]_∞, a polymer in which each Hg^II centre is tetracoordinated. In both compounds, each metal(II) cation is N‐coordinated by at least one HacacPy ligand. Equimolar reaction between these Cd^II and Hg^II derivatives, either conducted in ethanol as solvent or via grinding in the solid state, leads to ligand redistribution and the formation of the well‐ordered bimetallic polymer catena‐poly[[bromidomercury(II)]‐μ‐bromido‐[aquabis[4‐hydroxy‐3‐(pyridin‐4‐yl)pent‐3‐en‐2‐one]cadmium(II)]‐di‐μ‐bromido], [CdHgBr₄(C₁₀H₁₁NO₂)₂(H₂O)]_n or [{HgBr}(μ‐Br){(HacacPy)₂Cd(H₂O)}(μ‐Br)₂]_∞. Hg^II and Cd^II cations alternate in the [100] direction. The HacacPy ligands do not bind to the Hg^II cations, which are tetracoordinated by three bridging and one terminal bromide ligand. The Cd^II centres adopt an only slightly distorted octahedral coordination. Three bromide ligands link them in a (2 + 1) pattern to neighbouring Hg^II atoms; two HacacPy ligands in a cis configuration, acting as N‐atom donors, and a terminal aqua ligand complete the coordination sphere. Classical O—H…Br hydrogen bonds stabilize the polymeric chain. O—H…O hydrogen bonds between aqua H atoms and the uncoordinated carbonyl group of an HacacPy ligand in a neighbouring strand in the c direction link the chains into layers in the (010) plane.     

Zweikernige Palladium(II)‐, Platin(II)‐ und Iridium(III)‐Komplexe von Bis[imidazol‐4‐yl]alkanen

Dinuclear Palladium(II), Platinum(II), and Iridium(III) Complexes of Bis[imidazol‐4‐yl]alkanes The reaction of bis(1,1′‐triphenylmethyl‐imidazol‐4‐yl) alkanes ((CH₂)_n bridged imidazoles L(CH₂)_nL, n = 3–6) with chloro bridged complexes [R₃P(Cl)M(μ‐Cl)M(Cl)PR₃] (M = Pd, Pt; R = Et, Pr, Bu) affords the dinuclear compounds [Cl₂(R₃P)M–L(CH₂)_nL–M(PR₃)Cl₂] 1 – 17 . The structures of [Cl₂(Et₃P)Pd–L(CH₂)₃L–Pd(PEt₃)Cl₂] ( 1 ), [Cl₂(Bu₃P)Pd–L(CH₂)₄L–Pd(PBu₃)Cl₂] ( 10 ), [Cl₂(Et₃P)Pd–L(CH₂)₅L–Pd(PEt₃)Cl₂] ( 3 ), [Cl₂(Et₃P)Pt–L(CH₂)₃L–Pt(PEt₃)Cl₂] ( 13 ) with trans Cl–M–Cl groups were determined by X‐ray diffraction. Similarly the complexes [Cl₂(Cp*)Ir–L(CH₂)_nL–Ir(Cp*)Cl₂] (n = 4–6) are obtained from [Cp*(Cl)Ir(μ‐Cl)₂Ir(Cl)Cp*] and the methylene bridged bis(imidazoles).     

Chemical Conversion of Hg‐Clusters: Synthesis and Crystal Structure of $ {\rm [(DMSO)_2 Co(NC \overline{S)_4(Hg}-TePh)_2]_{\rm n} }$, the First Compound Containing a Polymeric Hg—Te Chain

The six‐membered ring Hg₃Te₃ of [Hg₃Cl₃(μ‐TePh)₃]·2 DMSO {(Ph = C₆H₅; DMSO = (CH₃)₂SO} was opened by redissolution with DMSO, reacting with Co[Hg(SCN)₄] and affording polymeric . The monoclinic novel compound belong to the space group P2₁/n and assembles in a bidimensional lattice tetrahedral Hg^II(SCN)₂Te₂‐ and octahedral Co^II(NCS)₄(DMSO)₂‐chains linked trough SCN bridges along the crystallographic axis b and diagonally to the ac axes. The structure of [(DMSO)₂Co(NCS)₄(Hg—TePh)₂]_n is limited by the DMSO ligands in the axial positions of the Co‐octahedrons.     

2‐Amino‐5‐(2‐pyridyl)‐thiadiazole as Bidentate Ligand

The amino substituted bidentate chelating ligand 2‐amino‐5‐(2‐pyridyl)‐1,3,4‐thiadiazole (H₂ L ) was used to prepare 3:1‐type coordination compounds of iron(II), cobalt(II) and nickel(II). In the iron(II) perchlorate complex [Fe^II(H₂ L )₃](ClO₄)₂·0.6MeOH·0.9H₂O a 1:1 mixture of mer and fac isomers is present whereas [Fe^II(H₂ L )₃](BF₄)₂·MeOH·H₂O, [Co^II(H₂ L )₃](ClO₄)₂·2H₂O and [Ni^II(H₂ L )₃](ClO₄)₂·MeOH·H₂O feature merely mer derivatives. Moessbauer spectroscopy and variable temperature magnetic measurements revealed the [Fe^II(H₂ L )₃]²⁺ complex core to exist in the low‐spin state, whereas the [Co^II(H₂ L )₃]²⁺ complex core resides in its high‐spin state, even at very low temperatures.     

A one‐dimensional chloride‐bridged PtII/PtIV mixed‐valence complex with a 4‐[(4‐hydroxyphenyl)diazenyl]benzenesulfonate counter‐ion

The title compound, catena‐poly[[[bis(ethylenediamine‐κ²N,N′)platinum(II)]‐ μ‐chlorido‐[bis(ethylenediamine)platinum(IV)]‐μ‐chlorido] tetrakis{4‐[(4‐hydroxyphenyl)diazenyl]benzenesulfonate} dihydrate], {[Pt^IIPt^IVCl₂(C₂H₈N₂)₄](HOC₆H₄N=NC₆H₄SO₃)₄·2H₂O}_n, has a linear chain structure composed of square‐planar [Pt(en)₂]²⁺ (en is ethylenediamine) and elongated octahedral trans‐[PtCl₂(en)₂]²⁺ cations stacked alternately, bridged by Cl atoms, along the b axis. The Pt atoms are located on an inversion centre, while the Cl atoms are disordered over two sites and form a zigzag ...Cl—Pt^IV—Cl...Pt^II... chain, with a Pt^IV—Cl bond length of 2.3140 (14) Å, an interatomic Pt^II...Cl distance of 3.5969 (15) Å and a Pt^IV—Cl...Pt^II angle of 170.66 (6)°. The structural parameter indicating the mixed‐valence state of the Pt atom, expressed by δ = (Pt^IV—Cl)/(Pt^II...Cl), is 0.643.     

Structural characterization of the derivatives of bis{[2,6‐(dimethylamino)methyl]phenyl} selenide with palladium(II) and mercury(II)

The intramolecularly coordinated homoleptic diorgano selenide bis{2,6‐bis[(dimethylamino)methyl]phenyl} selenide, C₂₄H₃₈N₄Se or R₂Se, where R is 2,6‐(Me₂NCH₂)₂C₆H₃, 14 , was synthesized and its ligation reactions with Pd^II and Hg^II precursors were explored. The reaction of 14 with SO₂Cl₂ and K₂PdCl₄ resulted in the formation of the meta C—H‐activated dipalladated complex {μ‐2,2′‐bis[(dimethylamino)methyl]‐4,4′‐bis[(dimethylazaniumyl)methyl]‐3,3′‐selanediyldiphenyl‐κ⁴C¹,N²:C^1′,N^2′}bis[dichloridopalladium(II)], [Pd₂Cl₄(C₂₄H₃₈N₄Se)] or [{R(H)PdCl₂}₂Se], 15 . On the other hand, when ligand 14 was reacted with HgCl₂, the reaction afforded a dimercurated selenolate complex, {μ‐bis{2,6‐bis[(dimethylamino)methyl]benzeneselanolato‐κ⁴N²,Se:Se,N⁶}‐μ‐chlorido‐bis[chloridomercury(II)], [Hg₂(C₁₂H₁₉N₂Se)Cl₃] or RSeHg₂Cl₃, 16 , where two Hg^II ions are bridged by selenolate and chloride ligands. In palladium complex 15 , there are two molecules located on crystallographic twofold axes and within each molecule the Pd moieties are related by symmetry, but there are still two independent Pd centers. Mercury complex 16 results from the cleavage of one of the Se—C bonds to form a bifurcated SeHg₂ moiety with the formal charge on the Se atom being ?1. In addition, one of the Cl ligands bridges the two Hg atoms and there are two terminal Hg—Cl bonds. Each Hg atom is in a distorted environment which can be best described as a T‐shaped base with the bridging Cl atom in an apical position, with several angles close to 90° and with one angle much larger and closer to 180°.     

Ein Beitrag zu Rhenium(II)‐, Osmium(II)‐ und Technetium(II)‐Thionitrosylkomplexen vom Typ [M(NS)Cl4py]—: Darstellung,Strukturen und EPR‐Spektren

A Contribution to Rhenium(II)‐, Osmium(II)‐, and Technetium(II)‐Thionitrosyl‐Complexes: Preparation, Structures, and EPR‐Spectra The reaction of [Re^VINCl₄]^— and [Os^VINCl₄]^— with S₂Cl₂ leads to the formation of the thionitrosyl complexes [M^II(NS)Cl₄]^— (M = Re, Os) which could not be isolated as pure compounds. Addition of pyridine to the reaction mixture results in the formation of the stable compounds trans‐(Ph₄P)[Os^II(NS)Cl₄py], trans‐(Hpy)[Os^II(NS)Cl₄py], trans‐(Ph₄P)[Re^II(NS)Cl₄py], and cis‐(Ph₄P)[Re^II(NS)Cl₄py]. The crystal structure analyses show for trans‐(Ph₄P)[Os^II(NS)Cl₄py] (monoclinic, P2₁/n, a = 12.430(3)Å, b = 18.320(4)Å, c = 15.000(3)Å, β = 114.20(3)°, Z = 4), trans‐(Hpy)[Os^II(NS)Cl₄py] (monoclinic, P2₁/n, a = 7.689(1)Å, b = 10.202(2)Å, c = 20.485(5)Å, β = 92.878(4)°, Z = 4), trans‐(Ph₄P)[Re^II(NS)Cl₄py] (triclinic, P1¯, a = 9.331(5)Å, b = 12.068(5)Å, c = 15.411(5)Å, α = 105.25(1)°, β = 90.23(1)°, γ = 91.62(1)°, Z = 2), and cis‐(Ph₄P)[Re^II(NS)Cl₄py] (monoclinic, P2₁/c, a = 10.361(1)Å, b = 16.091(2)Å, c = 17.835(2)Å, β = 90.524(2)°, Z = 4) M‐N‐S angles in the range 168‐175°. This indicates a nearly linear coordination of the NS ligand. The metal atom is octahedrally coordinated in all cases. The rhenium(II) thionitrosyl complexes (5d⁵ “low‐spin” configuration, S = 1/2) are studied by EPR in the temperature range 295 > T > 130 K. In addition to the detection of the complexes formed during the reaction of [Re^VINCl₄]^— with S₂Cl₂ EPR investigations on diamagnetically diluted powders and single crystals of the system (Ph₄P)[Re^II/Os^II(NS)Cl₄py] are reported. The ^{185, 187}Re hyperfine parameters are used to get information about the spin‐density distribution of the unpaired electron in the complexes under study. [Tc^VINCl₄]^— reacts with S₂Cl₂ under formation of [Tc^II(NS)Cl₄]^— which is not stable and decomposes under S₈ elimination and rebuilding of [Tc^VINCl₄]^— as found by EPR monitoring of the reaction.     

Self‐Assembly of Five 8‐Hydroxyquinolinate‐Based Complexes: Tunable Core,Supramolecular Structure,and Photoluminescence Properties

Five new Zn^II complexes, namely [Zn₃(L)₆] ( 1 ), [Zn₂(Cl)₂(L)₂(py)₂] ( 2 ), [Zn₂(Br)₂(L)₂(py)₂] ( 3 ), [Zn(L)₂(py)] ( 4 ), and [Zn₂(OAc)₂(L)₂(py)₂] ( 5 ), were prepared by the solvothermal reaction of ZnX₂ (X^?=Cl^?, Br^?, F^?, and OAc^?) salts with a 8‐hydroxyquinolinate ligand (HL) that contained a trifluorophenyl group. All of the complexes were characterized by elemental analysis, IR spectroscopy, and powder and single‐crystal X‐ray crystallography. The building blocks exhibited unprecedented structural diversification and their self‐assembly afforded one mononuclear, three binuclear, and one trinuclear Zn^II structures in response to different anions and solvent systems. Complexes 1 – 5 featured four types of supramolecular network controlled by non‐covalent interactions, such as π???π‐stacking, C? H???π, hydrogen‐bonding, and halogen‐related interactions. Investigation of their photoluminescence properties exhibited disparate emission wavelengths, lifetimes, and quantum yields in the solid state.     

Ruthenium(II/III)‐Based Compounds with Encouraging Antiproliferative Activity against Non‐small‐Cell Lung Cancer

Hereby we present the synthesis of several ruthenium(II) and ruthenium(III) dithiocarbamato complexes. Proceeding from the Na[trans‐Ru^III(dmso)₂Cl₄] ( 2 ) and cis‐[Ru^II(dmso)₄Cl₂] ( 3 ) precursors, the diamagnetic, mixed‐ligand [Ru^IIL₂(dmso)₂] complexes 4 and 5 , the paramagnetic, neutral [Ru^IIIL₃] monomers 6 and 7 , the antiferromagnetically coupled ionic α‐[Ru^III₂L₅]Cl complexes 8 and 9 as well as the β‐[Ru^III₂L₅]Cl dinuclear species 10 and 11 (L=dimethyl‐ (DMDT) and pyrrolidinedithiocarbamate (PDT)) were obtained. All the compounds were fully characterised by elemental analysis as well as ¹H NMR and FTIR spectroscopy. Moreover, for the first time the crystal structures of the dinuclear β‐[Ru^III₂(dmdt)₅]BF₄ ? CHCl₃ ? CH₃CN and of the novel [Ru^IIL₂(dmso)₂] complexes were also determined and discussed. For both the mono‐ and dinuclear Ru^II and Ru^III complexes the central metal atoms assume a distorted octahedral geometry. Furthermore, in vitro cytotoxicity of the complexes has been evaluated on non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC) NCI‐H1975 cells. All the mono‐ and dinuclear Ru^III dithiocarbamato compounds (i.e., complexes 6 – 10 ) show interesting cytotoxic activity, up to one order of magnitude higher with respect to cisplatin. Otherwise, no significant antiproliferative effect for either the precursors 2 and 3 or the Ru^II complexes 4 and 5 has been observed.     

Complexes of Group 12 Metal Dihalides with 2‐Acetylpyridine‐N‐oxide 4N‐methylthiosemicarbazone (H4MLO). The Crystal Structures and Organization of [Zn(H4MLO)X2] (X = Br,I)

Reaction of group 12 metal dihalides with 2‐acetylpyridine‐N‐oxide ⁴N‐methylthiosemicarbazone (H4MLO) in ethanol afforded compounds [M(H4MLO)X₂] (M = Zn^II, Cd^II, Hg^II; X = Cl, Br, I), the structures of which were characterized by elemental analysis and by IR and ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectroscopy. In addition, the complexes of ZnBr₂ and ZnI₂ were analysed structurally by X‐ray diffractometry. In [Zn(H4MLO)Br₂] the ligand is O,N,S‐tridentate and the metal is pentacoordinated, while in [Zn(H4MLO)I₂] the thiosemicarbazone is S,O‐bis‐monodentate and the Zn^II cation has a distorted tetrahedral coordination polyhedron. In assays of antifungal activity against Aspergillus niger and Paecilomyces variotii, only the mercury compounds showed any activity, and only [Hg(H4MLO)Cl₂] and [Hg(H4MLO)I₂] were competitive with nystatin against A. niger.     

A one‐dimensional ladder‐like six‐coordinate cadmium polymer: catena‐poly[bis[(S)‐2‐methylpiperazine‐1,4‐diium] [bis[trichloridocadmium(II)]‐di‐μ3‐chlorido]]

The crystal structure of the title compound {(C₅H₁₄N₂)₂[Cd₂Cl₈]}_n, (I), consists of hydrogen‐bonded 2‐methylpiperazinediium (H₂MPPA²⁺) cations in the presence of one‐dimensional polymeric {[CdCl₃(μ₃‐Cl)]²⁻}_n anions. The Cd^II centres are hexacoordinated by three terminal chlorides and three bridging chlorides and have a slightly distorted octahedral CdCl₃(μ₃‐Cl)₃ arrangement. The alternating CdCl₆ octahedra form four‐membered Cd₂Cl₂ rings by the sharing of neighbouring Cd–Cl edges to give rise to extended one‐dimensional ladder‐like chains parallel to the b axis, with a Cd...Cd distance of 4.094 (2) Å and a Cd...Cd...Cd angle of 91.264 (8)°. The H₂MPPA²⁺ cations crosslink the [CdCl₃(μ₃‐Cl)]_n chains by the formation of two N—H...Cl hydrogen bonds to each chain, giving rise to one‐dimensional ladder‐like H₂MPPA²⁺–Cl₂ hydrogen‐bonded chains [graph set R₄²(14)]. The [CdCl₃(μ₃‐Cl)]_n chains are interwoven with the H₂MPPA²⁺–Cl₂ hydrogen‐bonded chains, giving rise to a three‐dimensional supramolecular network.     

Poly[bis(4‐chloropyridinium) tetra‐μ2‐chlorido‐tetrachloridotrimercurate(II)]

The structure of the title compound, {(C₅H₅ClN)₂[Hg₃Cl₈]}_n, consists of 4‐chloropyridinium cations and one‐dimensional [Hg₃Cl₈]²⁻ anion chains. There are two coordination environments for Hg^II in the inorganic chain. The first is a distorted tetrahedral geometry made up of an HgCl₂ unit with two Cl⁻ anion bridges, while the second is an octahedral coordination geometry consisting of an HgCl₂ unit and four chloride‐anion bridges. This gives rise to a novel three‐layer centrosymmetric polymer. Finally, the three‐dimensional network comes about through the many C—H...Cl and N—H...Cl hydrogen bonds that link the organic and inorganic layers.     

Synthesis and Structural Characterization of Metal Complexes of 2‐Formylpyrrole‐4N‐ethylthiosemicarbazone (4 EL1) and 2‐Acetylpyrrole‐4N‐ethylthiosemicarbazone (4 EL2)

The reactions of ⁴N‐ethyl‐2‐[1‐(pyrrol‐2‐yl)methylidene(hydrazine carbothioamide ( 4 EL₁ ) and ⁴N‐ethyl‐2[1‐(pyrrol‐2‐yl)ethylidene(hydrazine carbothioamide ( 4 EL₂ ) with Group 12 metal halides afforded complexes of types [M(L)₂X₂] (M = Zn, Cd; L = 4 EL₁, 4 EL₂; X = Cl, Br, I; 1 – 6 , 14 – 19 ) and [M(L)X₂] (M = Hg; L = 4 EL₁, 4 EL₂; X = Cl, Br, I; 7 – 9 , 20 – 22 ). In addition, reaction of 4 EL₁ with salts of Cu^II, Ni^II, Pd^II and Pt^II afforded compounds of type [M(4 EL₁–H)₂] ( 10 – 13 ). The new compounds were characterized by elemental analysis, FAB mass spectrometry, IR and electronic spectroscopy and, for sufficiently soluble compounds, ¹H, ¹³C and, when appropriate, ¹¹³Cd or ¹⁹⁹Hg NMR spectrometry. The spectral data suggest that in their complexes with Group 12 metal cations, both thiosemicarbazones are neutral and S‐monodentate; and for [Zn(4 EL₁)₂I₂] ( 3 ), [Cd(4 EL₁)₂Br₂] ( 5 ) and [Hg(4 EL₁)Cl₂]₂ ( 7 ) this was confirmed by X‐ray diffractometry. By contrast, in its complexes with Cu^II and Group 10 metal cations, 4 EL₁ is monodeprotonated and S,N‐bidentate, as was confirmed by X‐ray diffractometry for [Ni(4 EL₁–H)₂] ( 11 ) and [Pd(4 EL₁–H)₂] ( 12 ).     

Copper(II) Halide Complexes with 1‐tert‐Butyl‐1H‐1,2,4‐triazole and 1‐tert‐Butyl‐1H‐tetrazole

1‐tert‐Butyl‐1H‐1,2,4‐triazole (tbtr) was found to react with copper(II) chloride or bromide to give the complexes [Cu(tbtr)₂X₂]_n and [Cu(tbtr)₄X₂] (X = Cl, Br). 1‐tert‐Butyl‐1H‐tetrazole (tbtt) reacts with copper(II) bromide resulting in the formation of the complex [Cu₃(tbtt)₆Br₆]. The obtained crystalline complexes as well as free ligand tbtr were characterized by elemental analysis, IR spectroscopy, thermal and X‐ray analyses. For free ligand tbtr, ¹H NMR and ¹³C NMR spectra were also recorded. In all the complexes, tbtr and tbtt act as monodentate ligands coordinated by Cu^II cations via the heteroring N⁴ atoms. The triazole complexes [Cu(tbtr)₂Cl₂]_n and [Cu(tbtr)₂Br₂]_n are isotypic, being 1D coordination polymers, formed at the expense of single halide bridges between neighboring copper(II) cations. The isotypic complexes [Cu(tbtr)₄Cl₂] and [Cu(tbtr)₄Br₂] reveal mononuclear centrosymmetric structure, with octahedral coordination of Cu^II cations. The tetrazole compound [Cu₃(tbtt)₆Br₆] is a linear trinuclear complex, in which neighboring copper(II) cations are linked by single bromide bridges.     

Two different one‐dimensional supramolecular chains formed from the reaction of 2‐[1‐(pyridin‐4‐ylmethyl)‐1H‐benzimidazol‐2‐yl]quinoline with two different precursors,Co(NO3)2 and CoCl2

Two different one‐dimensional supramolecular chains with Co^II cations have been synthesized based on the semi‐rigid ligand 2‐[1‐(pyridin‐4‐ylmethyl)‐1H‐benzimidazol‐2‐yl]quinoline (L), obtained by condensation of 2‐(1H‐benzimidazol‐2‐yl)quinoline and 4‐(chloromethyl)pyridine hydrochloride. Starting from different Co^II salts, two new compounds have been obtained, viz. catena‐poly[[[dinitratocobalt(II)]‐μ‐2‐[1‐(pyridin‐4‐ylmethyl)‐1H‐benzimidazol‐2‐yl]quinoline] dichloromethane monosolvate acetonitrile monosolvate], {[Co(NO₃)₂(C₂₂H₁₆N₄)]·CH₂Cl₂·CH₃CN}_n, (I) and catena‐poly[[[dichloridocobalt(II)]‐μ‐2‐[1‐(pyridin‐4‐ylmethyl)‐1H‐benzimidazol‐2‐yl]quinoline] methanol disolvate], {[CoCl₂(C₂₂H₁₆N₄)]·2CH₃OH}_n, (II). In (I), the Co^II centres lie in a distorted octahedral [CoN₃O₃] coordination environment. {Co(NO₃)₂L}_n units form one‐dimensional helical chains, where the L ligand has different directions of twist. The helical chains stack together via interchain π–π interactions to form a two‐dimensional sheet, and another type of π–π interaction further connects neighbouring sheets into a three‐dimensional framework with hexagonal channels, in which the acetonitrile molecules and disordered dichloromethane molecules are located. In (II), the Co^II centres lie in a distorted trigonal–bipyramidal [CoCl₂N₃] coordination environment. {CoCl₂L}_n units form one‐dimensional chains. The chains interact via C—H...π and C—H...Cl interactions. The result is that two‐dimensional sheets are generated, which are further linked into a three‐dimensional framework via interlayer C—H...Cl interactions. When viewed down the crystallographic b axis, the methanol solvent molecules are located in an orderly manner in wave‐like channels.     

Two Heterometallic–Organic Frameworks Composed of Iron(III)‐Salen‐Based Ligands and d10 Metals: Gas Sorption and Visible‐Light Photocatalytic Degradation of 2‐Chlorophenol

Two examples of heterometallic–organic frameworks (HMOFs) composed of dicarboxyl‐functionalized Fe^III‐salen complexes and d¹⁰ metals (Zn, Cd), [Zn₂(Fe‐L)₂(μ₂‐O)(H₂O)₂] ? 4 DMF ? 4 H₂O ( 1 ) and [Cd₂(Fe‐L)₂(μ₂‐O)(H₂O)₂] ? 2 DMF ? H₂O ( 2 ) (H₄L=1,2‐cyclohexanediamino‐N,N′‐bis(3‐methyl‐5‐carboxysalicylidene), have been synthesized and structurally characterized. In 1 and 2 , each square‐pyramidal Fe^III atom is embedded in the [N₂O₂] pocket of an L^4? anion, and these units are further bridged by a μ₂‐O anion to give an (Fe‐L)₂(μ₂‐O) dimer. The two carboxylate groups of each L^4? anion bridge Zn^II or Cd^II atoms to afford a 3D porous HMOF. The gas sorption and magnetic properties of 1 and 2 have been studied. Remarkably, 1 and 2 show activity for the photocatalytic degradation of 2‐chlorophenol (2‐CP) under visible‐light irradiation, which, to the best of our knowledge, is the first time that this has been observed for Fe^III‐salen‐based HMOFs.     

Crystal Structure of the Mixed‐Valent Basic Mercury Nitrate HgI2(NO3)2·HgII(OH)(NO3)·HgII(NO3)2·4HgIIO [= Hg8O4(OH)(NO3)5]

Light‐yellow single crystals of the mixed‐valent mercury‐rich basic nitrate Hg₈O₄(OH)(NO₃)₅ were obtained as a by‐product at 85 °C from a melt consisting of stoichiometric amounts of (Hg^I₂)(NO₃)₂·2H₂O and Hg^II(OH)(NO₃). The title compound, represented by the more detailed formula Hg^I₂(NO₃)₂·Hg^II(OH)(NO₃)·Hg^II(NO₃)₂·4Hg^IIO, exhibits a new structure type (monoclinic, C2/c, Z = 4, a = 6.7708(7), b = 11.6692(11), c = 24.492(2) Å, β = 96.851(2)°, 2920 structure factors, 178 parameters, R1[F² > 2σ(F²)] = 0.0316) and is made up of almost linear [O‐Hg^II‐O] and [O‐Hg^I‐Hg^I‐O] building blocks with typical Hg^II‐O distances around 2.06Å and a Hg^I‐O distance of 2.13Å. The Hg₂²⁺ dumbbell exhibits a characteristic Hg‐Hg distance of 2.5079(7) Å. The different types of mercury‐oxygen units form a complex three‐dimensional network exhibiting large cavities which are occupied by the nitrate groups. The NO₃^? anions show only weak interactions between the nitrate oxygen atoms and the mercury atoms which are at distances > 2.6Å from one another. One of the three crystallographically independent nitrate groups is disordered.