Synthesis,crystal structure and photophysical studies on a ruthenium(II) carbonyl hydrido compound based on 2,2′‐bipyridyl‐5,5′‐dicarboxylic acid (H2bpdc)

A novel complex, namely [Ru^II(PPh₃)(CO)(H)(Hbpdc)]·2MeOH ( 1 ) (H₂bpdc = 2,2′‐bipyridyl‐5,5′‐dicarboxylic acid), has been synthesized from the reaction of H₂bpdc with [Ru^II(PPh₃)₃(CO)(H)₂] in methanol under mild condition and characterized by elemental analysis, IR spectrum, ESI mass spectrometry, and single crystal X‐ray diffraction. The structure shows that the complex crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2₁/c with unit cell parameters a = 11.8984(13) Å, b = 16.5180(18) Å, c = 25.5322(19) Å, β = 115.302(4)°, V = 4536.6(8) ų, Z = 4. This compound features a 1‐D supramolecular chain constructed via hydrogen bonds. Its photophysical properties have been investigated in MeOH solution and in the solid state at room temperature.     

Three‐Dimensional Structure Constructed via Hydrogen Bonds and π‐π Stacking Interaction. Crystal Structure of [Cu(AFO)2(H2O)2](ClO4)2.2(AFO).2H2O (AFO = 4,5‐Diazafluoren‐9‐one)

The structure of the title complexes [Cu(AFO)₂(H₂O)₂](ClO₄)₂.2(AFO).2H₂O (AFO = 4,5‐Diazafluoren‐9‐one)has been established by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. The complex crystallizes in the triclinic space group P‐1 with cell constants a = 7.659(3) Å, b = 11.066(3) Å, c = 14.203(5) Å, alpha = 75.16(3)°, β = 79.87(3)°, gamma = 85.71(3)°, Z = 1. The structure was solved by direct methods and refined to R₁ = 0.0595 (wR₂ = 0.1164). The X‐ray analysis reveals that a pair of AFO ligands chelate to a Cu(II) atom in an asymmetric fashion with one Cu‐N bond being much longer than the other, the Cu(II) atom is further coordinated by a pair of aqua ligands to form an elongated octahedral geometry. In the crystal of the complex, the mononuclear complex cations [Cu(AFO)₂(H₂O)₂]²⁺, uncoordinated AFO molecules, lattice water molecules and perchlorate anions are assembled into 3‐D structure via hydrogen bonds and π‐π stacking interaction.     

Synthesis and structure of the three‐dimensional coordination polymer [Ag3hmt3(μ3 ‐btc)]·5H2O

A new coordination polymer, [Ag₃hmt₃(μ₃ ‐btc)]·5H₂O (1) (hmt = hexamethylenetetramine, btc=1,3,5‐benzenetricarboxlic), has been successfully synthesized. Crystal data: P2₁/a, a = 11.9906(2) Å, b = 17.3689(2) Å, c = 16.96100(10) Å, β = 101.9820(14)°, V = 3455.40(7) ų, Z = 4, Dc = 2.002 Mg/m³. In the hexagonal structure of Ag‐hmt unit, each Ag‐hmt unit comprises three Ag atoms and three hmt ligands. The μ₃ ‐btc ligands bridge adjacent two‐dimensional honeycomb‐like Ag‐hmt layers to form three‐dimensional networks. Structure analysis show that hydrogen bonds play a key role for the stable structure in the compounds. (© 2005 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)     

Crystal structure of Li2MgSiO4

The crystal structure of Li₂MgSiO₄ was established by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis. The crystals are monoclinic, a = 4.9924(7) Å, b = 10.681(2) Å, c = 6.2889(5) Å, β = 90.46(1)°, Z = 4, sp. gr. P2₁/n, V = 335.54 ų, R = 0.062. In a Li₂MgSiO₄ crystal, four types of independent T(1–4) tetrahedra share vertices to form a three-dimensional framework. Three of these tetrahedra are occupied simultaneously by Li and Mg cations, which corresponds to the crystallochemical formula (Li_0.98Mg_0.02)(Li_0.80Mg_0.20) · (Li_0.22Mg_0.78)SiO₄. In slightly distorted SiO₄ tetrahedra denoted as T(1), the average Si-O distance is 1.635(2) Å. The distortions of other tetrahedra and the average (Li _x Mg_{1 ? x} )-O distances increase with an increase in lithium content. These distances in the T(2), T(3), and T(4) tetrahedra are 1.955(2), 1.971(4), and 2.019(6) Å, respectively. The structure of the new compound is compared with the crystal structures of other Li₂ M ²⁺SiO₄ compounds and the luminescence spectra of Cr⁴⁺: Li₂MgSiO₄.     

Direct and outer-sphere coordination of the magnesium ions in the crystal structures of complexes with 2-furancarboxylic acid (I) and 3-furancarboxylic acid (II)

(I) Mg₂C₂₀H₂₄O₁₈ monoclinic,PT,a=10.760(2) Å,b=11.052(2) Å,c=12.822(3) Å, α=105.31(3)^o, β=98.18(3)^o, γ=91.59(3)^o,Z=2. (II) MgC₁₀H₁₄O₁₀, monoclinic,C2/c,a=30.817(6)Å,b=10.499(2)Å,c=9.000(2)Å, β=91.31(3)^o,Z=8. Magnesium in complexes with furoic acids reveals two ways of coordination: direct, when furoic anions are bonded to Mg²⁺ in an ionic fashion and outer-sphere, when cations bind water in the first coordination sphere and furancarboxylic ligands are hydrogen bonded to the water molecules. This results in the formation of three bridging systems: ?Mg?O_carboxyl?C?O_carboxyl?Mg?, ?Mg?O_water ?O_carboxyl?C?O_carboxyl?C?O_carboxyl?Mg?, and ?Mg?O_water?O_carboxyl?C?O_carboxyl?O_water?Mg?. Magnesium 2-furancarboxylate (I) is dimeric, while magnesium 3-furancarboxylate (II) exhibits a polymeric structure.     

Synthesis,Crystal and Molecular Structure of Cd2(sacch)4(Im)4

The title compound has been synthesized and its crystal structure determined at room temperature. Cd₂(Sacch)₄(Im)₄ F.W. = 1225.83, monoclinic. Space group: C2/c, Z = 4, a = 20.065(3) Å, b = 11.164(4) Å, c = 20.697(6) Å, β = 94.69(5)°, The coordination polyhedron of Cd(II) correspond to a five-coordinate trigonal-bipyramid. In the title complex, two of the saccharin groups act as monodentate ligands. The other two act as bidentate ligands. The two Cd(II) ions are bridged by the two bidentate saccharin groups and the distance is 4.75 Å.     

Crystal structure of an ammonium thiocyanate complex of 18–crown–6

The title compound (C₁₃H₃₀N₂O₇S) has been determined from three‐dimensional X‐ray diffraction data. The crystals are monoclinic, a = 22.654(8) Å, b = 8.652(4) Å, c = 23.925(9) Å, β = 123.880(9)°, V = 3893(3) ų, Z = 8, D_calc = 1.192 g/cm³, space group C2/c. The structure was solved by direct methods and refined by full‐matrix least squares method (R = 0.051). The ammonium cation is displaced by 1.08 Å from the mean plane of the ligand causing hydrogen bonding with the macrocyclic O atoms in a perching arrangement. The thiocyanate anion forms an extended hydrogen bonded chain with the cation via the occluded water molecule. (© 2004 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)     

Mild hydrothermal synthesis and structures of mixed‐valence iron phosphates: SrFe3(PO4)3 and the interesting Mg2+‐doped AFe3 (PO4)3 (A = Ba,Pb) in Fe2+ site

Series of mixed valence monophosphates AFe_3‐xMg_x(PO₄)₃ [A = Sr(x = 0), Ba(x = 0.6), Pb(x = 0.6)] were synthesized by mild hydrothermal treatment at 210 °C. Refinements of single crystal X‐ray diffraction datas show all these compounds are isostructural. The attempts to make AFe₃(PO₄)₃ (A = Ba, Pb) hydrothermally in the experiment were unsuccessful. However, the Mg‐doped homologues AFe_2.4Mg_0.6(PO₄)₃ (A = Ba, Pb) were synthesized with the addition of MgCO₃ in the reactants as mineralizer. EDS and single crystal X‐ray data refinement indicated that the Mg²⁺ cations were doped in the Fe²⁺ sites of AFe_2.4Mg_0.6(PO₄)₃ (A = Ba, Pb). The influence of the Mg‐doping on the structure and the reason why the Mg doped in the Fe(II) site instead of A site was discussed from the point of view of the bond valence model.     

Synthesis and structure of a new one‐dimensional cobalt complex with dicyanamide and 4‐picolyl choride bridges

The synthesis and structure of the 1D cobalt (II) complex, [Co( L )₂(dca)₂] ( 1 ) (dca = dicyanamide, C₂N₃^–, L = 4‐picolyl choride) is reported. Complex 1 crystallized in triclinic system, space group P ‐1, with cell dimensions of a = 7.291(2) Å, b = 7.481(2) Å, c = 9.007(3) Å, α =104.444(4)°, β = 96.971(4)°, γ =102.618(4)°, V = 456.1(2) ų, Z = 1, Dc = 1.624 Mg/m³. In complex 1 , Co (II) is 6‐coordinated by N atoms of four dca ligands and two L ligands. The centrosymmetric CoN6 chromophore is an axially elongated octahedron that has Co‐N distances ranging from 2.122(3) to 2.154(3) Å. (© 2006 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)     

Crystallization and structural studies of n‐benzyloxycarbonyl‐L‐tyrosine‐L‐glycine‐ethyl ester (Z‐Tyr‐Gly‐OEt)

It is axiomatic that efficient crystal production reflects upon the quality of structure. An empirical relation for mass proportions of two solvents in crystallization of Z‐Tyr‐Gly‐OEt shows a linear relationship. The dipeptide crystallizes in orthorhombic space group P2₁2₁2_1, with cell parameters a = 5.0680(1) Å, b = 13.8650(1) Å and c = 28.2630(1) Å, Z = 4, D_calc= 1.339Mg/m³, μ=0.820mm^‐1, F₀₀₀=848, CuKα = 1.5418 Å. The structure was solved by direct methods and final R1 and wR2 are 0.444 and 0.1276, respectively. The structure analysis reveals the trans conformation of the peptide unit with ω = ‐178.2(5)°, implying only a slight deviation from planarity. The torsion angles at glycine [ϕ, ψ = ‐84.4(7)°, 179.9(5)°] are characteristic of left‐handed poly glycine II helices. A number of N‐H…O, O‐H…O and C‐H…O hydrogen bondings play a role in stabilizing the molecules within unit cell. (© 2004 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)     

Crystal structure and phase transition in the compound [C6H5CH2NH(CH3)2]TlCl4

The N‐N dimethyl benzylammonium tetrachlorothallate (III) [C₆H₅CH₂NH(CH₃)₂]TlCl₄ crystallizes in the monoclinic system P2₁/n at room temperature with the following unit cell dimensions: a = 7.725(3) Å, b = 14.080(5) Å, c = 13.697(4) Å, β = 91.2(2)° with Z = 4. The structure shows a layer arrangement perpendicular to the b axis: planes of [TlCl₄]^‐ tetrahedra alternate with planes of [C₆H₅CH₂NH(CH₃)₂]⁺ cations. The cohesion of the atomic arrangement is ensured by hydrogen bonds N‐H…Cl. Differential scanning calorimetric and optical birefringence measurements reveals a phase transition at T = 339K. Raman spectroscopic study and dielectric measurements were performed to discuss the mechanism of the phase transition. (© 2007 WILEY ‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)     

Synthesis,Characterization and Crystal Structure of Ethyl 2-amino-4-(4-fluorophenyl)-6-phenylcyclohexa-1,3-diene-1-carboxylate

Ethyl 2-amino-4-(4-fluorophenyl)-6-phenylcyclohexa-1,3-diene-1-carboxylate was synthesized from ethyl 6-(4-bromophenyl)-4-(4-fluorophenyl)-2-oxocyclohex-3-ene-1-carboxylate and ammonium acetate in glacial acetic acid. The synthesized compound was characterized by elemental analysis, FT-IR, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), differential thermal analysis (DTA), UV-Visible, and single-crystal X-ray diffraction. The title compound, ethyl 2-amino-4-(4-fluorophenyl)-6-phenylcyclohexa-1,3-diene-1-carboxylate, C₂₁H₂OFNO₂, crystallizes in the orthorhombic space group Pbca with the following unit-cell parameters: a = 17.417(2), b = 9.7287(9), c = 21.014(2) Å, and Z = 8. The crystal structure was solved by direct methods using single-crystal X-ray diffraction data collected at room temperature and refined by full-matrix least-squares procedures to a final R-value of 0.0644 for 1616 observed reflections. An intramolecular N–H…O hydrogen bond generates an S(6) graph-set motif. In the crystal, molecules are linked by N–H…O hydrogen bonds, forming a two-dimensional network.     

Synthesis,crystal and molecular structure of trans‐bis(2‐pyridinepropanol)bis(saccharinato)nickel(II)

Trans‐bis(2‐pyridinepropanol)bis(saccharinato)nickel(II), [Ni(sac)₂(pypr)₂], where sac and pypr are the saccharinate anion and the 2‐pyridinepropanol molecule, respectively, crystallizes in the triclinic space group P (No. 2) with a = 8.1981(8), b = 9.9680(10), c = 10.4956(10) Å, α = 90.740(3)° β = 108.142(3)°, γ = 111.025(3)°, Z = 1, V = 1.537 ų. The structure of the nickel(II) complex consists of neutral molecules in which the nickel(II) ion sits on a center of symmetry and is octahedrally coordinated by two sac ligands, and two neutral pypr ligands. The pypr acts as a bidentate N‐ and O‐donor ligand forming a seven‐membered chelate ring, while sac behaves as a monodentate O‐donor ligand via the carbonyl O atom. The Ni‐N bond distance is 2.1016(15) Å, whereas the Ni‐O_pypr and Ni‐O_sac bond distances are 2.1280(12) and 2.0792(11) Å, respectively. The individual molecules are held together with a strong hydrogen bond between the hydroxyl O atom of pypr and N atom of sac and the C‐H…O type weak hydrogen bonds between some ring hydrogen atoms of pypr and sac, and the carbonyl and sulfonyl O atoms of sac in the neighbouring molecules. (© 2003 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)     

Synthesis and Structure of Trans‐bis(ethanolamine)bis(saccharinato)mercury(II)

Trans‐bis(ethanolamine)bis(saccharinato)mercury(II), [Hg(ea)₂(sac)₂], where ea and sac denote the ethanolamine molecule and the saccharinate anion, respectively, crystallizes in the triclinic space group P (No. 2) with a = 9.4651 (5), b = 10.4365 (5), c = 11.9314 (6) Å, α = 84.402 (1)° β = 78.313 (1)°, γ = 75.307 (1)°, Z = 2, V = 1115.11 (10) ų. The structure consists of isolated [Hg(ea)₂(sac)₂] units in which the Hg(II) ion is octahedrally coordinated by two nitrogen and two oxygen atoms of two neutral ea ligands, and two nitrogen atoms of two sac ligands. The ea acts as a bidentate N‐ and O‐donor ligand and occupies the trans positions of the equatorial plane of the coordination octahedron forming a fivemembered chelate ring, while sac behaves as a monodentate N‐donor ligand occupying the axial positions. The average Hg‐N_sac and Hg‐N_ea bond distances are 2.739 (3) and 2.114 (7) Å, respectively. The crystal exhibits extensive hydrogen bonds between the hydroxyl and amine hydrogen atoms of the ea ligands and the sulfonyl, carbonyl and amine groups of the sac ligands.     

Synthesis and crystal structure of novel complex phosphate Li5Cu2Al(PO4)4

A new complex phosphate Li₅Cu₂Al(PO₄)₄ has been obtained by the flux method in the Cs-Li-Cu-V-P-O system. Its crystal structure has been determined by X-ray diffraction (R ₁ = 2.74%) to be as follows: sp. gr. $P\bar 1$ , a = 4.860(5) Å, b = 7.788(5) Å, c = 8.324(5) Å, α = 69.542(5)°, β = 90.016(5)°, γ = 75.318(5)°, Z = 1, and V = 284.2(4) ų. The compound under study has a dense structure and a three-dimensional framework build up of [LiO₅], [AlO₆], [Cu/LiO₅], and [CuO₄] polyhedra and [PO₄] tetrahedra. A comparative crystal-chemical analysis of two isotypic compounds with a general formula Li₅Cu₂ M(PO₄)₄ (M = Fe, Al) has been performed. Topological relations between the Na₂Mg₅(PO₄)₄ and Li₅Cu₂ M(PO₄)₄ crystal structures, which are characterized by different cationic compositions, are revealed.     

Structure and conformation of n‐ (t‐butoxycarbonyl)‐l‐valine‐l‐phenylalanine‐methyl ester (Boc‐Val‐Phe‐OMe)

The crystal structure of N‐ (t‐butoxycarbonyl) ‐ L‐valine‐L‐phenylalanine‐methyl ester (Boc‐Val‐Phe‐OMe), C₂₀H₃₀N₂O₅ was determined by X‐ray diffraction methods. The dipeptide crystallizes in orthorhombic space group P2₁2₁2₁, with cell parameters a = 5.0680(1) Å, b = 13.8650(1) Å and c = 28.2630(1) Å, V = 2143.8(5) ų, F.W. = 378.46, Z = 4, D_calc = 1.173 Mg/m³, μ = 0.687 mm^‐1, F₀₀₀ = 816, CuKα = 1.5418 Å. The structure was solved by direct methods and final R1 and wR2 are 0.0659 and 0.1654, respectively. The peptide unit is in trans conformation [ω = 177.4(9)°]. The conformation angles ϕ₁, ψ₁, ϕ₂ and ψ₂ for the peptide backbone are: ‐96.5(13)°, 101.2(13)°, ‐123.9(12)° and 34.0(15)°. The N‐H…O and C‐H…O hydrogen bondings influence the packing of the molecules in the dipeptide crystal. (© 2004 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)     

X-ray and neutron diffraction studies of the hydridotriruthenium cluster complex (μ-H)Ru3(CO)7(μ-As(C6H5)CH2As(C6H5)2) ((C6H5 2AsCH2As(C6H5)·CH2Cl2: an example of dibridged metal-metal bond M(μ-H)(μ-X)M,involving a heavy bridgehead atom

The title compound is (μ-H)Ru₃(CO)₇(μ-As(C₆H₅)CH₂As(C₆H₅)₂)((C₆H₅)₂ AsCH₂As(C₆H₅)₂)·CH₂C1₂. Crystal data: monoclinic,P2₁/n, cell parameters (X-ray)a=12.82(2) Å,b=22.91(2) Å,c=17.83(2) Å, β=99.1(3)°; (neutron)a=12.94(1) Å, β=22.95(2)Å,c=17.93(3)Å,β=99.55(5)°. The structure was solved from X-ray data. FinalR indices areR(F)=0.051,R _w (F)=0.049 (X-ray);R(F)=0.064,R _w (F)=0.048,R(F ²)=0.072,R _w (F²)=0.088 (neutron). The complex is derived from Ru₃(CO)₈(dpam)₂ through reaction with hydrogen. The structure consists of a triangular array of metal atoms involving three metal-metal bonds[Ru(1)?Ru(2)=2.912(7)Å;Ru(1)?Ru(3)=2.829(3) A; Ru(2)?Ru(3)=2.845(6) Å]. The metal-metal edge Ru(1)?Ru(2) is supported by a bridging bis(diphenylarsino)methane ligand which lies in the equatorial plane. Activation of the second dpam ligand has generated the new face-bridging ligand unit μ-As(C₆H₅)CH₂As(C₆H₅)₂. In this unit, the bridgehead As atom spans over the Ru(1)?Ru(2) bond, while the second As atom is only bonded to Ru(3). The metal environment is achieved by CO ligands. The hydride ligand is bridging the Ru(1)?Ru(2) vector [Ru(1)?H=1.791(10) Å; Ru(2)?H=1.818(8) Å]. Geometric features of the dibridged Ru(μ-H)(μ-As)Ru bond are discussed.     

Synthesis and characterization of single crystals of the layered copper hydroxide acetate Cu2(OH)3(CH3COO)·H2O

Single‐crystals of the layered copper hydroxide acetate Cu₂(OH)₃(CH₃COO)·H₂O were synthesized by heating copper acetate solution at 60 °C. The standard synthesis of the title compound based on slow titration of copper acetate solution with NaOH yielded materials with worse morphology and an additional phase present. The obtained products were characterized with powder X‐ray diffraction, high temperature powder X‐ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy and infrared spectroscopy. The crystal structure was determined from single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction data, collected both at 120 K and at 293 K. The title compound crystallizes in the monoclinic botallackite‐type layered structure, space group P 2₁, with the lattice parameters a = 5.5776(3) Å, b = 6.0733(2) Å, c = 18.5134(8) Å, β = 91.802(4)° and a = 5.5875(4)Å, b = 6.0987(4) Å, c = 18.6801(10)Å, β = 91.934(5)° for 120 K and for 293 K, respectively. Acetate groups and water molecules are interlayered between corrugated sheets of edge‐sharing CuO6 octahedra exhibiting strong distortion resulted from the Jahn‐Teller effect. (© 2011 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)     

Carbonyl Displacement Reaction in Diiron Propane-Dithiolate Complex by Triphenylstibine: Crystal Structure of [Fe2(CO)6-n(SbPh3)n(μ-S2C3H6)] (n = 1 and 2)

Treatment of [Fe₂(CO)₆(μ-S₂C₃H₆)] (1) with triphenylstibine in a 1:1 molar ratio at room temperature in presence of Me₃NO resulted compound [Fe₂(CO)₅(SbPh₃)(μ-S₂C₃H₆)] (2) in 88% yield as red crystals. When the reaction was carried out under a 1:5 molar ratio in presence of Me₃NO, it resulted a monosubstituted compound [Fe₂(CO)₅(SbPh₃)(μ-S₂C₃H₆)] (2) in 63% yield along with a disubstituted compound [Fe₂(CO)₄(SbPh₃)₂(μ-S₂C₃H₆)] (3) in low yield (8%) as red crystals. Reaction of 2 with triphenylstibine in a 1:5 molar ratio under same condition resulted 3 in moderate yield (46%). Compounds 2 and 3 were characterized by elemental analyses, IR, ¹H NMR and ¹³C NMR spectroscopic data. Crystal structures of the compounds were unambiguously determined by single crystal X-Ray diffraction studies. Compound 2 crystalized as monoclinic crystal system with the space group P2₁/c, a?=?9.464(4) Å, b?=?16.902(7) Å, c?=?17.081(7) Å, β?=?101.216(13)° and Z?=?4. Compound 3 was triclinic, space group P-1, a?=?9.552(3) Å, b?=?13.985(5) Å, c?=?16.487(6) Å, α?=?78.372(16)°, β?=?89.976(14)°, γ?=?71.638(11)° and Z?=?2.

Graphic Abstract

Two new diiron propane-1,3-dithiolate complexes, [Fe₂(CO)₅(SbPh₃)(μ-S₂C₃H₆)] (2) and [Fe₂(CO)₄(SbPh₃)₂(μ-S₂C₃H₆)] (3), were synthesized by the displacement of carbonyl groups from [Fe₂(CO)₆(μ-S2C₃H₆)] (1) with triphenylstibine, and the resulting complexes were structurally characterized.

Solid state molecular structure of compound 2 (left) and compound 3 (right)

     

Crystal structure of 2‐(2'‐hydroxyphenyl)‐6‐tributylstannyl‐4‐(3H )‐quinazolinone and 2‐(2'‐hydroxyphenyl)‐6‐iodo‐4‐(3H)‐quinazolinone

The structures of the title compounds C₂₆H₃₇N₂O₂Sn ( I ) and C₁₄H₉IN₂O₂ ( II ) were determined by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction technique. Compound I crystallizes in the triclinic space group P1 with a = 9.560(3) Å, b = 16.899(6) Å, c = 17.872(5) Å, α = 65.957(7)°, β = 83.603(5)°, γ ( = 75.242(5)°, V = 2549.8(13) ų, Z = 4, and D =1.374 g/cm³. The compound consists of a quinazolinone ring with phenol and tributylstannyl moieties. Compound II crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2₁/c with a = 7.6454(12) Å, b = 5.9270(9) Å, c = 27.975(4) Å; α = 90°, β = 95.081(3)°, γ = 90°, V = 1262.7(3) ų, Z = 4, and D = 1.915 g/cm³. The compound consists of a quinazolinone ring with phenol and iodine substituents. For both I and II , the short intramolecular O–H…N and two long intermolecular N–H…O hydrogen bonds are highly effective in holding the molecular system in a stable state. (© 2006 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)