Reactive Compatibilization of Poly(trimethylene terephthalate)/Polypropylene Blends by Polypropylene‐graft‐Maleic Anhydride. Part 2. Crystallization Behavior

The crystallization behavior of uncompatibilized and reactive compatibilized poly(trimethylene terephthalate)/polypropylene (PTT/PP) blends was investigated. In both blends, PTT and PP crystallization rates were accelerated by the presence of each other, especially at low concentrations. When PP content in the uncompatibilized blends was increased to 50–60 wt%, PTT showed fractionated crystallization; a small PTT crystallization exotherm appeared at ～135°C besides the normal ～175°C exotherm. Above 70 wt% PP, PTT crystallization exotherms disappeared. In contrast, PP in the blends showed crystallization exotherms at 113–121°C for all compositions. When a maleic anhydride‐grafted PP (PP‐g‐MAH) was added as a reactive compatibilizer, the crystallization temperatures (T _c ) of PTT and PP shifted significantly to lower temperatures. The shift of PTT's T _c was larger than that of the PP, suggesting that addition of the PP‐g‐MAH had a larger effect on PTT's crystallization than on PP due to reaction between maleic anhydride and PTT.

The nonisothermal crystallization kinetics was analyzed by a modified Avrami equation. The results confirmed that PTT's and PP's crystallization was accelerated by the presence of each other and the effect varied with blend compositions. When the PP content increased from 0 to 60 wt%, PTT's Avrami exponent n decreased from 4.35 to 3.01; nucleation changed from a thermal to an athermal mode with three‐dimensional growths. In contrast, when the PTT content increased from 0 to 90 wt% in the blends, changes in PP's n values indicated that nucleation changed from a thermal (0–50 wt% PTT) to athermal (60–70 wt% PTT) mode, and then back to a thermal (80–90 wt% PTT) mode. When PP‐g‐MAH was added as a compatibilizer, the crystallization process shifted considerably to lower temperatures and it took a longer crystallization time to reach a given crystallinity compared to the uncompatibilized blends.     

Crystallization Behavior of Poly(Trimethylene Terephthalate)/Polycarbonate Blends

The crystallization behavior of poly(trimethylene terephthalate (PTT) in compatibilized and uncompatibilized PTT/polycarbonate (PC) blends are investigated in the research reported in this paper. The differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) results showed that the crystallization behaviors of PTT/PC blends were very sensitive to PC content. The onset (T_ci) and the peak (T_c) crystallization temperatures shifted to lower temperatures whereas the area of the exotherm decreased quickly as the PC content was increased. The Avrami exponent, n, decreased from 4.32 to 3.61 as the PC content was increased from 0 to 20 wt %, and the growth rate constant, Z _c , decreased gradually as well. This suggests that the nucleation mechanism exhibits the tendency of changing gradually from a thermal nucleation to an athermal mode although the growth mechanism still remains three‐dimensional. When epoxy (2.7 phr) was added as a compatibilizer during melt blending, the T_ci and T_c shifted slightly to higher temperature (≤2°C), and the crystallization enthalpy, however, exhibited an increased crystallinity with the exception of the 90/10/2.7 phr PTT/PC/Epoxy. This suggests that the epoxy make a positive contribution to the PTT crystallization. Moreover, the influences of epoxy on the crystallization behaviors of PTT/PC blends are related to the epoxy content. By contrast, the compatibilizer of ethylene‐propylene‐diene copolymer graft glycidyl methacrylate (EPDM‐g‐GMA, ≤6.3 phr) had little effect on the crystallization behavior of PTT/PC blends. For PTT/PC/Epoxy (2.7 phr) blends, the Avrami exponent, n, decreased to near 3, while the growth rate constant, Z _c , increased slightly as PC content was increased from 0 to 20 wt %. It is suggested that epoxy accelerated the process of the nucleation mechanism changing from thermal nucleation to an athermal mode. The EPDM‐g‐GMA had little effect on the nucleation mode and spherical growth mechanism. The PTT spherulite morphologies in PTT/PC blends were very sensitive to blend composition. Completely different morphologies were observed in pure PTT, PTT/PC, PTT/PC/Epoxy, and PTT/PC/EPDM‐g‐GMA blends.     

Reactive Compatibilization of Poly(trimethylene terephthalate)/Polypropylene Blends by Polypropylene‐graft‐Maleic Anhydride. Part 1. Rheology,Morphology, Melting,and Mechanical Properties

Poly(trimethylene terephthalate)/polypropylene (PTT/PP) blends were prepared by melt blending. The rheology, morphology, melting, and mechanical properties of PTT/PP blends were investigated with and without the addition of polypropylene‐graft‐maleic anhydride (PP‐g‐MAH). The melt viscosity results showed that the fluid behavior of PTT/PP blends exhibited great disparity to that of PTT but similar to that of PP; the dispersed flexible PP phase in the blends served as a “ball bearing effect” under shear stress, which made the fluid resistance markedly reduced; by contrast, the relatively rigid PTT dispersed phase made only a small contribution to the viscosity. With 5 wt.% PP‐g‐MAH addition during melt processing, both the shear viscosity and the non‐Newtonian index of 70/30 PTT/PP blend were increased over that of the corresponding uncompatibilized one, whereas the shear viscosity of the 30/70 PTT/PP melt decreased slightly indicating that a considerable amount of PP‐g‐MAH did not act as compatibilizer but probably served as plasticizer.

With the increasing of the other component, the melting temperature of the PTT phase showed a slight decrease while the melting temperature of the PP phase showed a slight increase. 5 wt.% PP‐g‐MAH addition had little influence on the melting temperatures of the two components. When PP≤20 wt.%, the cold crystallization temperature of the PTT phase (T_cc (PTT‐phase)) showed little change with the composition; however, it shifted to higher temperature when PP≥30 wt.%. The variations of the T_cc (PTT‐phase), with and without PP‐g‐MAH, suggested that, when PTT was a minor component, the excess PP‐g‐MAH which did not act as compatibilizer might serve as a plasticizer that made the PTT's cold crystallization process to be easier. The SEM results indicated that, for the uncompatibilized blends, the interfaces from particles pulling‐out are clear and smooth, while, for compatibilized blends, the reactive products are at the interfaces. The mechanical properties suggested that PP‐g‐MAH did not result in significant improvement of the toughness of the blend, but the tensile strength increased markedly.     

Microstructures and Mechanical Properties of Poly(Trimethylene Terephthalate)/Maleic Anhydride Grafted Poly(Ethylene-octene)/Polypropylene Blends

A range of blends based on 70 wt% of poly(trimethylene terephthalate) PTT with 30 wt% dispersed phase were produced via melt blending. The dispersed phase composition was varied from pure maleic anhydride grafted poly(ethylene-octene) (POE-g-MA) over a range of POE-g-MA:polypropylene (PP) ratios. The micromorphology and mechanical properties of the ternary blends were investigated. The results indicated that the domains of the POE-g-MA are dispersed in the PTT matrix, and at the same time the POE-g-MA encapsulate the PP domains. The interfacial reaction between the hydroxyl-end group of PTT and maleic anhydride (MA) during melt blending changes the formation from “isolated formation” to “capsule formation,” where the PP domains are encapsulated by POE-g-MA. Compared to the PTT/POE-g-MA blends, mechanical properties of ternary blends, such as tensile strength and Young's modulus, were improved significantly.     

Isothermal Melt Crystallization Kinetics for Poly(Trimethylene Terephthalate)/Poly(Butylene Terephthalate) Blends

The kinetics of isothermal melt crystallization of poly(trimethylene terephthalate) (PTT)/poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT) blends were investigated using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) over the crystallization temperature range of 184–192°C. Analysis of the data was carried out based on the Avrami equation. The values of the exponent found for all samples were between 2.0 and 3.0. The results indicated that the crystallization process tends to be two‐dimensional growth, which was consistent with the result of polarizing light microscopy (PLM). The activation energies were also determined by the Arrhenius equation for isothermal crystallization. The values of ΔE of PTT/PBT blends were greater than those for PTT and PBT. Lastly, using values of transport parameters common to many polymers (U*=6280 J/mol, T _∞=T _g – 30), together with experimentally determined values of T _m ⁰ and T _g, the nucleation parameter, K _g, for PTT, PBT, and PTT/PBT blends was estimated based on the Lauritzen–Hoffman theory.     

Thermal Behavior of Polypropylene-g-glycidyl Methacrylate Prepared by Melt Grafting

The thermal behaviors of glycidyl methacrylate (GMA)-grafted polypropylene (PP) (PP-g-GMA) with two different grafting degrees, namely, GPP1 and GPP2, were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), polarized optical microscopy (POM), wide-angle X-ray diffraction (WAXD), dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA), and thermogravimetrical analysis (TGA). DSC results suggested that the GMA grafted PP exhibited higher crystallization temperature T_c, higher melting temperature T_m, and higher crystallinity compared with the neat PP. The isothermal crystallization kinetics was analyzed with the Avrami equation and the total crystallization activation energy was calculated. It was concluded that the crystallization processes of PP and the grafted PP were controlled by nucleation and the values of the crystallization activation energy of PP and the grafted PP were almost identical. POM results suggested that the GMA grafted PP exhibited smaller spherulites size compared with the neat PP. WAXD patterns indicated that the neat PP encouraged the formation of γ phase, compared with the grafted PP, during the crystallization process. DMA results showed that melt grafting did not induce a clear effect on the γ-transition and β-transition of the amorphous phase but resulted in a decrease in mobility of the PP chains in the crystals. TGA curves suggested that the melt grafting slightly improved the thermal stability of PP.     

Miscibility,Morphology, and Thermal Properties of Poly(Trimethylene Terephthalate)/Polycarbonate

Abstract

Poly(trimethylene terephthalate)/polycarbonate (PTT/PC) blends were prepared by melt blending and rapid quenching in ice water. The miscibility and thermal properties were investigated using differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) and dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA). The blend's morphologies were investigated using scanning and transmission electron microscopies. Both DSC and DMA results suggested that PTT and PC were very limited, partially miscible pairs. The melting point, melt crystallization, and cold crystallization exotherms in the blends of PTT were depressed by the presence and amount of PC. When the PC content was <50 wt%, PC spherical particles were found to distribute evenly in the PTT matrix; at 50–60 wt%, the two‐phase structures were close to being bicontinuous. At higher PC content, PTT formed a string‐like texture in the PC matrix. The PTT spherulitic morphologies in PTT/PC blends were found to be very sensitive to PC and PC content. When the PC content was ≥60 wt%, the blends crystallized as an agglomeration of tiny PTT crystals.     

Compatibilization of Poly(Trimethylene Terephthalate)/Polycarbonate Blends by Epoxy. Part 2. Melting Behavior and Spherulite Morphology

The melting behaviors of poly(trimethylene terephthalate)/polycarbonate (PTT/PC) blends, compatibilized by epoxy, and PTT spherulite morphology in the blends were investigated. When epoxy was present during blending, the melting behaviors of PTT/PC blends changed substantially; glass transition temperatures (T_g's) and cold crystallization temperature (T_cc's) of the PTT‐rich phase shifted to higher temperatures, while T_m's shifted slightly to lower temperatures, indicating that epoxy suppressed considerably all processes of dynamic movements pertinent to molecular (or segmental) movements. The cold crystallization process responded sensitively to thermal history. Changes of T_cc's with composition suggested that the epoxy's compatibilization effect was pronounced when PTT and PC were in near equal content.

Recrystallization or reorganization exotherms appeared before melting for isothermally crystallized PTT/PC and PTT/PC epoxy (E) blends. A wide angle X‐ray diffraction (WAXD) analysis showed that, although the perfection of PTT crystallites was influenced either by PC content and the presence of compatibilizer or by the crystallization temperature and crystallization time, PTT's crystal structure was independent of these variables.

The polarized light microscopy (PLM) observations showed that PTT spherulite morphology was very sensitive to blend composition. Epoxy addition interfered severely with the growth of PTT spherulites, causing them to be much less developed. When the spherulites grew under a condition of varied composition, they would exhibit diversified spherulite morphology, though in one spherulite.     

Influence of Polycarbonate on the Crystallization Behavior of Poly(Trimethylene Terephthalate)/Polycarbonate Blends

To determine the factors influencing the retardation of the crystallization of poly(trimethylene terephthalate) (PTT) when PTT is blended with polycarbonate (PC), different PTT/PC blends were prepared via the melt mixing method. The relationships between the crystallization behavior and blend composition, as well as the phase morphology, were investigated. The results showed that the predominant reason for the retardation in crystallization is due to the PC content and phase morphology. The PC influences the crystallization of PTT via two methods. First, it retards PTT crystallization. Secondly, the PC exhibits a nucleation effect on the PTT crystallization which is, however, much weaker compared to the negative effect PC exerts with regards to PTT crystallization. When the processing temperature and shear rate remains unchanged, the two effects of PC determine the crystallization behavior of the blend. The phase morphology, which is strongly dependent on the mixing temperature and the shear rate, and which is also related to mixing time, had an appreciable impact on PTT crystallization. In the case of similar adhesion with the interface, a finer PC phase domain would show a slightly stronger nucleation effect on PTT crystallization.     

Nonisothermal Crystallization Kinetics of Nylon 66/Montmorillonite Nanocomposites

Polyamide 66(PA66)/montmorillonite nanocomposites were prepared via direct melt compounding. The nonisothermal crystallization of PA66 and PA66/MMT nanocomposites were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry. The results show that MMT platelets play a competing role in the crystallization process of nylon 66. On the one hand, they can act as a nucleator for the PA66 matrix, accelerating the crystallization rate; on the other hand, they retard the crystal/spherulite growth, especially for nanocomposites with higher MMT content. The analysis results using Jeziorny and Mo equations verify the dual actions of the nucleation and the obstruction of crystallization of MMT in the PA66 matrix. Kissinger's method was used to obtain the activation energy of the crystallization process; the results confirm that the incorporation of MMT causes the above actions.     

Nonisothermal Crystallization of the Polypropylene/Organosilica Nanocomposite

Abstract

Nonisothermal crystallization of the neat isotactic polypropylene homopolymer (PP‐0) and of the nanocomposite containing 4.68 wt.% of organosilica (PP‐4.68) was studied in the standard differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) mode during constant‐rate cooling from the melt state. Analysis of the nucleation parameters derived from cooling rate dependencies of the temperatures for the onset of crystallization exotherms suggested a slight increase of the nucleation barrier for lamellar crystallization of PP within a confined space between neighboring nanoparticles of an infinite cluster of the nanocomposite, concomitant to stronger restrictions to transport of PP segments across the melt/lamellar crystal interface. The overall crystallization rate data for PP‐4.68 were consistent with the assumption of two separate contributions from the initial (unconstrained) and the subsequent (constrained) nucleation mechanisms, respectively. The obtained results were considered as evidence for a coexistence in an undercooled PP melt of the nanocomposite of initial nucleation sites characteristic for the neat PP‐0, and the basically different nucleation sites (presumably, PP chains anchored by both ends to the surfaces of two adjacent nanoparticles).     

Study on the Non-isothermal Melt Crystallization Kinetics of PTT/PBT Blends

Macro-kinetic models, namely the modified Avrami, Ozawa, Mo, and Kissinger models, were applied to investigate the non-isothermal melt crystallization process of PTT/PBT blends by DSC measurements. It was found that the modified Avrami model can describe the non-isothermal melt crystallization processes of PTT/PBT blends fairly well. When the cooling rates range from 5 to 20°C/min, the Ozawa model could be used to satisfactorily describe the early stage of crystallization. However, the Ozawa model didn't fit the polymer blends in the late stage of crystallization, because it ignored the influence of secondary crystallization. Under the conditions of the non-isothermal melt crystallization, it was found that the cooling rates and the blend composition affect the crystallization for blends according to Kissinger crystallization kinetics parameters. The crystallization kinetics constant K_a increases with increasing cooling rate, indicating the crystallization rates of PTT, PBT, and PTT/PBT blends were improved. The crystallization kinetic activation energy parameters are good agreement with the results from isothermal crystallization processes of the polymer blends. The crystallization activation energy of PTT/PBT blends is higher than the activation energy of PTT and PBT.     

Toughened Poly(Trimethylene Terephthalate) by Blending with a Functionalized Metallocenic Poly(Ethylene-Octene) Copolymer

New toughened poly(trimethylene terephthalate) (PTT) materials were obtained by melt blending with maleic anhydride grafted poly(ethylene-octene) (POEg). Rheological properties, mechanical properties, and morphological characteristics of PTT/POEg blends at four different compositions—95/5, 90/10, 80/20, and 70/30—were studied. The melt viscosity of the blends shows a linear decrease on increasing the POEg content. The addition of rubbery POEg to the PTT matrix increases the impact strength, while tensile properties decrease. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) displayed a very good dispersion of POEg particles in the PTT matrix. Differential scanning colorimetry (DSC) experiments showed that for all samples the melting point was almost constant and the crystallinity did not show obvious differences. SEM results showed shear yielding of the PTT matrix was the major toughening mechanism.     

Effect of Organoclay Platelets on Crystallization of PTT/EPDM-g-MA Blends: Nonisothermal Melt Crystallization Kinetics

PTT/EPDM-g-MA (80/20 w/w) nanocomposites were prepared by melt mixing of poly(trimethylene terephthalate) (PTT), ethylene-propylene-diene copolymer grafted with maleic anhydride (EPDM-g-MA), and organoclay. The blend nanocomposites show typical sea-island morphologies. The nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of pure PTT and 80/20 (w/w) PTT/EPDM-g-MA blends with various amounts of the clay were extensively studied by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The Avrami, Ozawa, and Mo methods were used to describe the nonisothermal crystallization process of pure PTT and 80/20 (w/w) PTT/EPDM-g-MA blends with various amounts of the clay. Avrami analysis results show that the crystallization rates of 80/20 (w/w) PTT/EPDM-g-MA blends with the clay were faster than those of pure PTT or PTT/EPDM-g-MA blends without clay, which indicates that the clay particles promote crystallization effectively, in agreement with the Mo analysis results. Ozawa analysis can describe the nonisothermal crystallization of pure PTT very well but was rather inapplicable to the 80/20 (w/w) PTT/EPDM-g-MA blends with various amounts of the clay.     

Crystallization Behavior of PEO in Nano‐Structured PEO‐b‐PS/PPO Blends

Blends of poly (ethylene oxide)‐b‐polystyrene (PEO‐b‐PS) diblock copolymer and poly (2,6‐dimethyl‐1,4‐phenylene oxide) (PPO) homopolymer were obtained by solution blending, and the morphologies of PEO dispersed nanoparticles in PPO/PS matrix were observed by atomic force microscopy (AFM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The isothermal crystallization kinetics was studied using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and polarized optical microscopy (POM). Nonisothermal crystallization kinetics was studied using DSC. The results showed that PEO segments were easier to crystallize in the blend than in the copolymer probably due to the interfaces of PPO acting as nucleation sites to promote the crystallization of PEO. The crystallization of PEO blocks destroyed the pre‐existing microdomain structure even though the glass transition temperature of the matrix was much higher than the crystallization temperature.     

Miscibility and Isothermal Crystallization Behavior of Poly (Butylene Succinate-co-Adipate) (PBSA)/Poly (Trimethylene Carbonate) (PTMC) Blends

Poly(butylene succinate-co-adipate) (PBSA)/poly (trimethylene carbonate) (PTMC) blend samples with different weight ratios were prepared by solution blending. The morphologies after isothermal crystallization and in the melt were observed by optical microscopy (OM). Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was used to characterize the isothermal crystallization kinetics and melting behaviors. According to the OM image before and after melting, it was found that the blends formed heterogenous morphologies. When the PTMC content was low (20%), PBSA formed the continuous phase, while when the PTMC contents was high (40%), PBSA formed the dispersed phase. The glass transition temperatures (T_g) of the blends were determined by DSC and the differences of the T_g values were smaller than the difference between those of pure PBSA and PTMC. In addition, the equilibrium melting points were depressed in the blends. According to these results, the PBSA/PTMC blends were determined as being partially miscible blends. The crystallization kinetics was investigated according to the Avrami equation. It was found that the incorporation of PTMC did not change the crystallization mechanism of PBSA. However, the crystallization rate decreased with the increase of PTMC contents. The change of crystallization kinetics is related with the existences of amorphous PTMC, the partial miscibility between PLLA and PTMC, and the changes of phase structures.     

BLENDS OF THERMOTROPIC LIQUID CRYSTALLINE POLYESTER AND POLY(ETHYLENE TEREPHTHALATE)

Two kinds of blends of thermotropic liquid crystalline polymers (LCPs) and poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) were prepared by solution and melt blending, respectively. Crystallization behavior of the blends was observed by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The LCP in both blends considerably decreased the cold crystallization temperature of PET and increased the crystallization rate in the low-temperature region, but did not show any significant effect on crystallization in the high-temperature region. Phase behavior of samples prepared by melt blending was investigated with the scanning electronic microscope (SEM). It was found that LCP/PET blends display a biphasic structure with an aromatic unit-rich phase as a dispersed domain, and a highly oriented fibrous structure was formed on the fracture surface of the blends. During the melt blending process, PET reacted with LCP through transesterification, as indicated by both DSC and SEM measurements.     

Preparation,Morphology and Properties of Poly(Trimethylene Terephthalate)/Thermoplastic Polyester Elastomer Blends

Poly(trimethylene terephthalate)(PTT)/thermoplastic polyester elastomer (TPEE) blends were prepared and their miscibility, crystallization and melting behaviors, phase morphology, dynamic mechanical behavior, rheology behavior, spherulites morphology, and mechanical properties were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA), parallel-plate rotational rheometry, polarized optical microscopy (POM), wide angle X-ray diffraction (WAXD), universal tensile tester and impact tester, respectively. The results suggested that PTT and TPEE were partially miscible in the amorphous state, the TPEE rich phase was dispersed uniformly in the solid matrix with a size smaller than 2 μm, and the glass transition temperatures of the blends decreased with increasing TPEE content. The TPEE component had a good effect on toughening the PTT without depressing the tensile strength. The blends had improved melt viscosities for processing. When the blends crystallized from the melt state, the onset crystallization temperature decreased, but they had a faster crystallization rate at low temperatures. All the blends’ melts exhibited a predominantly viscous behavior rather than an elastic behavior, but the melt elasticity increased with increasing TPEE content. When the blends crystallized from the melt, the PTT component could form spherulites but their morphology was imperfect with a small size. The blends had larger storage moduli at low temperatures than that of pure PTT.     

Effect of Interfacial Structure on Crystallization Behavior of Polypropylene/Polyolefin Elastomer/Barium Sulfate Ternary Composites

In this paper, interfacial structure induced development of crystallization behavior of polypropylene (PP)/polyolefin elastomer (POE)/barium sulfate (BaSO₄) ternary composites was studied by DSC. Two kinds of PP (copolymer and homopolymer) were used. The compatibility between PP and POE had a distinct influence on nucleation and crystal growth of PP in PP/POE binary composites. The crystallization rate of PP homopolymer increased because of the heterogeneous nucleation by POE, while the crystallinity of PP homopolymer decreased because of an inhibition effect of the hexane side chains in POE. BaSO₄ particles acted as heterogeneous nucleating agents of PP in ternary composites. The dispersion of BaSO₄, controlled by interfacial design, had a distinct influence on the nucleation activity of BaSO₄ in ternary composites. Interfacial structure had the same effect on nucleation activity of BaSO₄ particles and crystallization rate of PP matrix in PP copolymer ternary composites as those in PP homopolymer ternary composites.     

Melting and Crystallization Behaviors of Poly(Lactic Acid) Modified with Graphene Acting as a Nucleating Agent

Graphene (GN)-filled polylactic acid (PLA) nanocomposites were prepared through a solution blending method with GN weight percent ranging from 0.5 to 2?wt%. Rheological, melting and crystallization behaviors of the prepared PLA/GN nanocomposites were investigated by means of dynamic rheological measurements and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The shear viscosities of the PLA/GN nanocomposites decreased with increasing GN content, which was remarkably different from previous reports on the modifications using traditional nanofillers (e.g., clay, carbon nanotubes, etc.). The nonisothermal melt crystallization kinetic analysis suggested that GN served as a nucleating agent and could considerably promote the PLA’s crystallization through heterogeneous nucleation. Our findings suggested that at relatively low cooling rates (??≤?10?°C/min) even a small amount of GN promoted the nucleation and considerably increased the crystallization rate. However, the crystallinity began to decrease at higher cooling rates (e.g., ??≥?20?°C/min), especially when the GN content was high (e.g., 2?wt%), possibly owing to the GN aggregation effect considering PLA is a slowly crystallizing polymer.