Supramolecular aspects of iron(II) crown-dipyridyl spin-crossover compounds

The synthesis, structures and magnetism of the complexes [Fe^II(3-bpp)₂][bpmdcK](SeCN)_1.7(ClO₄)_1.3·MeOH·H₂O (1), [Fe^II(3-bpp)₂]₄[bpmdcH₂(H₂O)₂](ClO₄)₁₀·7H₂O·3MeOH (2) and cis-[Fe^II₂(NCSe)₂((3,5-Me₂pz)₃CH)₂(μ-bpmdc)]·2MeCN (3) (where 3-bpp = 2,6-di(pyrazole-3yl)pyridine, bpmdc = N,N′-bis(4-pyridyl-methyl)diaza-18-crown-6) and (3,5-Me₂pz)₃CH = tris(3,5-dimethylpyrazole)methane, are presented. These compounds form a study of the supramolecular influence of host–guest/crown-ether interactions and cation-to-crown hydrogen-bonding effects upon d⁶ spin transitions, the latter occurring above, or near to, room temperature in 1 and 2. Desolvation effects also influence the T_1/2 values. The dinuclear compound 3 contains covalent pyridyl (crown) N to Fe bridge bonding and remains high spin.     

Magnetic and theoretical characterization of a ferromagnetic Mn(III) dimer

Reaction of 1,1,1-tris(hydroxymethyl)ethane (H₃thme) with the complex [Mn₂O₂(bpy)₄](ClO₄)₃ produces the dimeric species [Mn₂(Hthme)₂(bpy)₂](ClO₄)₂ in high yield. Magnetic measurements in the temperature range 1.8–300 K and in fields up to 7 T reveal weak ferromagnetic exchange between the metal centres with J = +2.13 cm⁻¹. A fit of the magnetization data, assuming only the ground state is populated, gives S = 4, g = 1.71 and D = −0.65 cm⁻¹. Low temperature single crystal measurements suggest the co-existence of SMM behaviour and strong intermolecular interactions. Density functional calculations also support a weak exchange interaction between the Mn ions.     

Complexes derived from the copper(II) perchlorate/maleamic acid/2,2′-bipyridine and copper(II) perchlorate/maleic acid/2,2′-bipyridine reaction systems: Synthetic,reactivity, structural and spectroscopic studies

A systematic investigation of the reactions of Cu(ClO₄)₂ · 6H₂O with maleamic acid (H₂L) in the presence of 2,2′-bipyridine (bpy) has been carried out. The chemical and structural identity of the products depends on the solvent, the absence or presence of external hydroxides in the reaction mixture and the molar ratio of the reactants. Various reaction schemes have led to the isolation of the complexes [Cu₂(HL)₂(bpy)₂(H₂O)₂](ClO₄)₂ (1), [Cu₂(HL)₂(bpy)₂(H₂O)₂](ClO₄)₂ · 2H₂O (1 · 2H₂O), [Cu(L′′)(bpy)]_n · 2nH₂O (2 · 2nH₂O), [Cu₂(L′′)(bpy)₂(H₂O)₂]_n(ClO₄)_2n · 0.5nH₂O (3 · 0.5nH₂O), [Cu₂(L′′)₂(bpy)₂] · 2MeOH (5 · 2MeOH), [Cu₂(L′)₂(bpy)₂(ClO₄)₂] (6) and [Cu(ClO₄)₂(bpy)(MeCN)₂] (7b), where L′′^2? and L′^? are the maleate(?2) and monomethyl maleate(?1) ligands, respectively. The HL^? ion has been transformed to L′′^2? and L′^? in the known compounds 2 · 2nH₂O and 6, respectively, via metal ion-assisted processes involving hydrolysis (2 · 2nH₂O) and methanolysis (6) of the primary amide group. The reaction that leads to 6 takes place through the formation of the mononuclear complex [Cu(ClO₄)₂(bpy)(MeOH)₂] (7a), whose structure was assigned on the basis of its spectral similarity with the structurally characterized complex 7b. The structures of the cations in 1 and 1 · 2H₂O consists of two Cu^II atoms bridged by the carboxylate groups of the two HL^? ligands, each exhibiting the less common η² coordination mode; a chelating bpy molecule and a H₂O ligand complete square pyramidal coordination at each metal centre. The structure of the dinuclear repeating unit in the 1D coordination polymer 3 · 0.5nH₂O consists of two Cu^II atoms bridged by two syn,syn η¹:η¹:μ₂ carboxylate groups belonging to two L′′^2? ions; each ligand bridged two neighboring [Cu^II,II₂] units thus promoting the formation of a helical chain. The structure of the dinuclear molecule of complex 5 · 2MeOH consists of two Cu^II atoms bridged by two η² carboxylate groups from two L′′^2? ligands; the second carboxylate group of each maleate(?2) ligand is monodentately coordinated to Cu^II, creating a remarkable seven-membered chelating ring. The L′^? ion behaves as a carboxylate-type ligand in 6, with the carboxylate group being in the familiar syn,syn η¹:η¹:μ₂ coordination mode; a chelating bpy molecule and a coordinated ClO₄^? complete five-coordination at each Cu^II centre. The crystal structures of the complexes are stabilized by various H-bonding patterns. Characteristic IR bands of the complexes are discussed in terms of the known structures and the coordination modes of the ligands.     

Synthesis,structures and magnetic properties of two hexanuclear complexes

The reaction of salicylaldoxime (H₂salox) with Mn(ClO₄)₂ · 6H₂O, NaN(CN)₂ and NEt₃ in MeOH affords a Mn^III₆ hexanuclear complex of [Mn₆O₂(salox)₆(MeOH)₆(NCNCONH₂)₂] (1), while reaction of H₂salox with MnCl₂ · 4H₂O and NEt₄OH in EtOH affords a Mn^III₆ hexanuclear complex of [Mn₆O₂(salox)₆(EtOH)₄(H₂O)₂Cl₂] (2). Both complexes 1 and 2 contain a [Mn^III₆(μ₃-O)₂]¹⁴⁺ core, which is a known structural type in the family of Mn₆ complexes. Variable temperature magnetic susceptibilities and magnetization measurement of complexes 1 and 2 have been carried out. Exchange interactions of metal centers for complexes 1 and 2 are fitted by a full diagonalization matrix method. The fitting results indicate that both complexes 1 and 2 have the ground-state spin value of S = 4, and the ground state of complex 1 has the much closer energy to low-lying spin states than that of complex 2. Magnetization measurements at 2.0–4.0 K and 10–70 kG confirm that the ground state is S = 4, with significant magnetoanisotropy as gauged by the D value of ?0.82 cm^?1 and ?1.18 cm^?1, for 1 and 2, respectively. The frequency dependence of the out-of-phase component in alternating current magnetic susceptibilities for both complexes 1 and 2 indicates the slow magnetic relaxation of superparamagnetic behaviour with a U_eff of 27.0(1) K and τ₀ = 3.8(2) × 10^?9 s for complex 1, and U_eff of 25.1(6) K and τ₀ = 4.6(1) × 10^?8 s for complex 2.     

Spectroscopy,thermal and structural studies of new ZnII coordination polymer, [Zn3(μ-bpa)4.5(AcO)3](ClO4)3·4.26H2O

Three Zn^II coordination polymers with acetate and perchlorate anions, [Zn₃(μ-bpa)_4.5(AcO)₃](ClO₄)₃·4.26H₂O (1), [Zn₂(μ-bpe)₃(AcO)₂](ClO₄)₂ (2) and [Zn₂(bpe)(AcO)₄] (3), bpa = 1,2-bis(4-pyridyl)ethane and bpe = 1,2-bis(4-pyridyl)ethene, have been synthesized and characterized by elemental analysis, IR, ¹H NMR, and ¹³C NMR spectroscopies, and the structure of compound 1 was determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. The thermal stabilities of compounds 1–3 were studied by thermal gravimetric (TG) and differential thermal analyses (DTA). The structural studies of compound 1 show that the structure may be considered as a three-dimensional coordination polymer of zinc(II) with large voids filled with disordered water molecules. The stability of the porous networks after removal of the guest water molecules is confirmed by X-ray powder diffraction.     

Versatile binding properties of di-pyridyl ligands with Cu(II) complexes: The syntheses,structural characterization and thermal analysis of six new species

A novel series of 4,4′-bipyridine- and 1,2-bis(4-pyridyl)ethane-Cu(II) complexes were synthesized using a variety of amine ligands (DPA = di(2-pyridylmethyl)amine, Medpt = 3,3′-diamino-N-methyldipropylamine, Hbpca = bis(2-pyridylcarbonyl)amine, TPA = tris(2-pyridylmethyl)amine) and cyclen = 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane). Different complexes were obtained including mononuclear [Cu(cyclen)(4,4′-bipy)](ClO₄)₂ (1), dinuclear {[Cu(μ₂-bpca)(4,4′-bipy)(H₂O)]ClO₄}₂ (2), [Cu₂(DPA)₂(μ₂-4,4′-bipy)(ClO₄)₄)]·H₂O (3), [Cu₂(cyclen)₂(μ₂-bpe)](ClO₄)₄ (4) and [Cu₂(TPA)₂(μ₂-bpe)](ClO₄)₄ (5) and the 1-D polymer, {[Cu(Medpt)(μ₂-4,4′-bipy)](ClO₄)₂}_n (6). In the 1–6 samples, cooling up to 100 K produces only the expected, minor, changes in cell constants given no space group changes. Therefore, data for the 100 K structures are reported only. Single-crystal X-ray crystallography reveals the monodentate coordination of the 4,4′-bipy in 1 and 2, and the bridged nature of the di-pyridyl ligands in the dinuclear complexes 2–5 and in the polymeric complex 6. In this series, structures 3–6 consist of the 4,4′-bipy or bpe bridging the two Cu(II) centers, the coordination by the tri- or the tetra-N donors of the amine, and the ClO₄^? groups as counter ions in 4–6 complexes. In the complexes 3–6, the Cu···Cu distances across the bridged di-pyridyl ligands were found to be greater than 11 Å. The magnetic properties of complex 3 reveal no evidence for magnetic coupling between the two Cu(II) centers (J = ?0.58 cm^?1).     

[Mn18]2+ and [Mn21]4+ single-molecule magnets

The synthesis and structural characterization of the two new Mn complexes [Mn₁₈O₁₄(O₂CMe)₁₈(hep)₄(hepH)₂(H₂O)₂](ClO₄)₂ (1) and [Mn₂₁O₁₆(O₂CMe)₁₆(hmp)₆(hmpH)₂(pic)₂(py)(H₂O)](ClO₄)₄ (3) are presented, together with a detailed study of their magnetic properties. Complex 1 possesses a ground-state spin of S=13, and the ground-state spin for 3 is estimated to be S=17/2 or 19/2. Both complexes 1 and 3 are new examples of single-molecule magnets (SMMs), displaying frequency-dependent out-of-phase AC signals, as well as magnetization vs. DC field hysteresis at temperatures below 1 K. Complex 1 straddles the classical/quantum interface by also displaying quantum tunneling of the magnetization (QTM).     

Four novel linear trinuclear assemblies containing bridging triazole ligands. Crystal structure,magnetic, semiconducting and fluorescent properties

Four homotrinuclear linear coordination compounds with bridging ligand of (m-phenol)-1,2,4-triazole, [Mn₃(L)₆(H₂O)₆](ClO₄)₆ (1), [Ni₃(L)₆(H₂O)₆](BF₄)₆·4DMF (2), [Cd₃(L)₆(H₂O)₆](ClO₄)₆· 2H₂O·2DMF·2EtOH (3), [Zn₃(L)₈(H₂O)₄](BF₄)₄(SiF₆)·2EtOH·12H₂O (4), have been synthesized and structurally determined. The structures consist of three metal ions in linear arrangements, linked to each other by two pairs of three N1, N2 bridging triazole ligands. The negative value of J suggests that antiferromagnetic interaction exists in 1. Green fluorescence of 2 and 4 with emissions at 518 nm for 2 and 524 for 4 is possibly assigned to LMCT. The energy gaps of the compounds 2 and 4 are 1.82 and 1.97 eV, respectively, which suggests that the two materials behave as semiconductors.     

Formation of out of plane oxime metallacycles in [Cu2] and [Cu4] complexes

The reaction of Cu(ClO₄)₂·6H₂O with dimethylglyoxime (H₂dmg) in a 1:1 mole ratio in aqueous methanol at room temperature affords the dinuclear complex [Cu₂(μ-Hdmg)₄] (1). Reaction of 1 with [Cu(bpy)(H₂O)₂](ClO₄)₂ (bpy = 2,2′-bipyridine) in a 1:1 mole ratio in aqueous methanol at room temperature yields the tetranuclear complex [Cu₄(μ-Hdmg)₂(μ-dmg)₂(bpy)₂(H₂O)₂](ClO₄)₂ (2). The direct reaction of Cu(ClO₄)₂·6H₂O with H₂dmg and bpy in a 2:2:1 mole ratio in aqueous methanol at room temperature also yields 2 quantitatively. The complexes 1 and 2 were structurally characterized by X-ray crystallography. Unlike the binding in Ni/Co-dmg, two different types of N?O bridging modes during the oxime based metallacycle formation and stacking of square planar units have been identified in these complexes. The neutral dinuclear complex 1 has CuN₄O coordination spheres and complex 2 consists of a dicationic [Cu₄(μ-Hdmg)₂(μ-dmg)₂(bpy)₂(H₂O)₂]²⁺ unit and two uncoordinated ClO₄^? anions having CuN₄O and CuN₂O₃ coordination spheres. The two copper(II) ions are at a distance of 3.846(8) Å in 1 for the trans out of plane link and at 3.419(10) and 3.684(10) Å in 2 for the trans out of plane and cis in plane arrangements, respectively. The average Cu–N_oxime distances are 1.953 and 1.935 Å, respectively. The average basal and apical Cu?O_oxime distances are 1.945, 2.295 and 2.429 Å. The UV–Vis spectra of 2 is similar to the spectrum of the reaction mixture of 1 and [Cu(bpy)(H₂O)₂]²⁺. Variable temperature magnetic properties measurement shows that the interaction between the paramagnetic copper centers in complex 1 is antiferromagnetic in nature. The EPR spectra of frozen solution of the complexes at 77 K consist of axially symmetric fine-structure transitions (ΔM_S = 1) and half-field signals (ΔM_S = 2) at ca. 1600 G, suggesting the presence of appreciable Cu–Cu interactions.     

Structures and spin states of mono- and dinuclear iron(II) complexes of imidazole-4-carbaldehyde azine and its derivatives

Mononuclear [Fe(H₂L^R)₂]X₂ (R = H, 2-Me, 5-Me, 2-Et-5-Me; X = ClO₄, BF₄) and dinuclear [Fe₂(H₂L^R)₃]X₄ complexes containing imidazole-4-carbaldehyde azine (H₂L^H) and its derivatives prepared by condensation of 4-formylimidazole, 2-methyl- or 5-methyl-4-formylimidazole, or 2-ethyl-4-methyl-5-formylimidazole, with hydrazine in a 2:1 mole ratio in methanol, were prepared and their magnetostructural relationships were studied. In the mononuclear complexes, H₂L^R acts as an unsymmetrical tridentate ligand with two imidazole nitrogen atoms and one azine nitrogen atom, while in the dinuclear complexes, H₂L^R acts as a dinucleating ligand employing four nitrogen atoms to form a triple helicate structure. At room temperature, [Fe₂(H₂L^H)₃](ClO₄)₄ and [Fe₂(H₂L^2-Me)₃](ClO₄)₄ were in the high-spin (HS) and low-spin (LS) states, respectively. The results are in accordance with the ligand field strength of H₂L^2-Me with electron-donating methyl groups being stronger than H₂L^H, with the order of the ligand field strengths being H₂L^2-Me > H₂L^H. However, in the mononuclear [Fe(H₂L^H)₂](ClO₄)₂ and [Fe(H₂L^2-Me)₂](ClO₄)₂ complexes, a different order of ligand field strengths, H₂L^H > H₂L^2-Me, was observed because [Fe(H₂L^H)₂](ClO₄)₂ was in the LS state while [Fe(H₂L^2-Me)₂](ClO₄)₂ was in the HS state at room temperature. X-ray structural studies revealed that the interligand steric repulsion between a methyl group of an H₂L^2-Me ligand and the other ligand in [Fe(H₂L^2-Me)₂](ClO₄)₂ is responsible for the observed change in the spin state. The same is true for [Fe(H₂L^2-Et-5-Me)₂](ClO₄)₂, while [Fe(H₂L^5-Me)₂](ClO₄)₂ does not involve such a steric congestion and stays in the LS state over the temperature range 5–300 K. Two kinds of crystals (polymorphs) were isolated for [Fe₂(H₂L^H)₃](BF₄)₄ and [Fe₂(H₂L^2-Et-5-Me)₃](ClO₄)₄, and they exhibited different magnetic behaviors.     

Syntheses,crystal structures and properties of dinuclear copper(I) complexes

Two dinuclear molecule-bridged Cu(I) complexes, (μ-bpym)[Cu(PPh₃)Cl]₂ (1), [(μ-bpym)(CuL)₂](ClO₄)₂·(CH₃CN)₂(H₂O) (2) (bpym = 2,2′-bipyrimidine, L = (R)-(+)-2,2′-bis(diphenylphospho)-1,1′-dinaphthalene) have been synthesized and characterized. The molecular structures of the two new dinuclear compounds exhibit bridging of two copper(I) centers by the symmetrically bis-chelating bpym ligand. Intriguingly, compound 1 features a remarkable “intramolecular organic sandwich” configuration where the central 2,2′-bipyrimidine bridging ligand interacts in π/π/π fashion with two phenyl rings from the coligands above and below the central plane, while chiral compound 2 exhibits second-order nonlinear optical effect and temperature-dependent luminescence. Upon decreasing the temperature from 298 to 10 K, compound 2 shows a red light emission.     

Syntheses,structures and single-molecule magnetic behaviors of two dicubane Mn4 complexes

The reaction of MnX₂ · 4H₂O (X = Cl or Br) with 2,6-bis(hydroxymethyl)-4-methylphenol (H₃L) and NaOH in methanol solution yielded two tetranuclear manganese complexes, [Mn₄(HL)₄(MeOH)₄Cl₂] (1) and [Mn₄(HL)₄(MeOH)₄Br₂] (2). Both compounds crystallize in the monoclinic space group C₂/c with cell parameters: a = 26.0945(19) Å, b = 11.4999(8) Å, c = 21.2188(16) Å, β = 121.050(1)° and z = 4 for 1 · 2Et₂O; a = 25.8145(3) Å, b = 11.6734(2) Å, c = 21.3956(3) Å, β = 120.1277(6)° and z = 4 for 2 · 2Et₂O. Both complexes consist of a mixed-valence dicubane structure, which comprises two Mn^II and two Mn^III ions. Magnetic susceptibilities and magnetization of complexes 1 and 2 in the solid state indicate that two clusters have an S = 9 ground state. Frequency-dependent out-of-phase signals of alternating current magnetic susceptibilities were observed in the low temperature range (<3 K) for both complexes indicating a slow magnetic relaxation.     

Strategies towards the purposeful design of long-range ferromagnetic ordering due to spin canting

The magnetic properties of three octahedral iron(II) complexes with Schiff-base like equatorial N₂O₂ coordinating ligands and methanol (MeOH) or 4,4′-bipyridyl (bipy) as axial ligands are reported. The methanol adduct 1(MeOH) ([FeL1(MeOH)](MeOH); with L1 = [3,3′]-[3,4-pyridinebis(iminomethylidyne)bis(2,4-pentanedionato)(2-)-N,N′,O²,O²′] shows a strong spontaneous magnetization at low temperatures. The complexes 2(MeOH)_0.5 ([FeL1(bipy)](MeOH)_0.5) and 3(MeOH) ([FeL2(MeOH)₂](MeOH); with L2 = [3,3′]-[1,2-phenylenebis(iminomethylidyne)bis(2,4-dioxo-4-phenylbutane)(2-)-N,N′,O²,O²′] show no indication for some long-range magnetic ordering. Results from X-ray structure analysis of all three complexes indicate that the strong spontaneous magnetization of 1(MeOH) is due to spin canting with a canting angle near 90°.     

Synthesis,structures and magnetic properties of two novel tetranuclear iron(III) single-molecule magnets: Enhanced energy barriers in solution

[Fe^III₄(acac)₆(Br-mp)₂] (1) and [Fe^III₄(acac)₆(tmp)₂] (2) were obtained from the reaction of Fe(acac)₂ with the appropriate tripodal alcohol. Both magnetic clusters show clear signatures for ferrimagnetic super exchange coupling. A fit of the DC susceptibility of 1 with the Kambe model gives J = ?8.2 ± 0.2 cm^?1, with g = 1.96 ± 0.02. Powder AC susceptibility data display significant frequency dependence for both compounds. The observation of an out-of-phase component demonstrates that these molecules may be single-molecule magnets (SMMs). AC susceptibility data for frozen solutions of 1 and 2 in toluene also show an out-of-phase signal proving these molecules are SMMs in solution. Going from powder to solution, the χ″ signals shift to higher temperatures which points towards an increase in energy barrier for the magnetization relaxation.     

Syntheses,structures and magnetic studies of three heterometallic Fe2Ln 1D coordination polymers

Three new heterometallic 1D coordination polymers [Fe^III₂Pr(4-Me-sal)₄(2,2′-bipy)₂(H₂O)₆](NO₃) · 2MeOH · 1.5H₂O (1), [Fe^III₂Gd(4-Me-sal)₄(2,2′-bipy)₂(H₂O)₅]Cl_1/2(NO₃)_1/2 · 5H₂O (2) and [Fe^III₂Dy(4-Me-sal)₄(2,2′-bipy)₂(H₂O)₅]Cl_1/2(NO₃)_1/2 · 5H₂O (3) have been synthesized. 1 and 2 were characterized by single-crystal X-ray crystallography, and 3 was shown to be isomorphous to 2 by X-ray powder diffraction. Magnetic studies show that the three compounds show a similar temperature dependence of their magnetic susceptibilities over the range 1.8–300 K. The observed decrease of χT with decreasing temperature for all three compounds could be the result of antiferromagnetic interactions between Fe–Ln centres and/or the depopulation of the Stark sublevels in the case of the anisotropic Ln ions (Pr^III and Dy^III).     

Fast tunneling Jahn–Teller isomer of the [Mn12O12(O2CC6H4-2-CH3)16(H2O)4] · S single-molecule magnet

The single-crystal X-ray structure of the single-molecule magnet [Mn₁₂O₁₂(O₂CC₆H₄-2-CH₃)₁₆(H₂O)₄] · CH₂Cl₂ · 2H₂O (complex 1) is reported. Complex 1 is a new example of a “Jahn–Teller isomer”, since it has two Mn(III) ions with abnormally oriented Jahn–Teller elongation axes. Complex 1 has a lower activation energy (U_eff = 29 K) for magnetization reversal relative to other reported [Mn₁₂O₁₂] type molecules (e.g., U_eff = 70 K for Mn₁₂Ac). Single-crystal low temperature magnetization measurements are reported that confirm that complex 1 is a single-molecule magnet. High-field electron paramagnetic resonance measurements were performed on a single crystal to give the spin Hamiltonian parameters.     

Ruthenium(II) and iron(II) complexes of N-pyridyl substituted imidazolin-2-ylidenes

N-mesityl-N′-pyridyl-imidazolium chloride 1a and the corresponding bromide salt 1b have been deprotonated with NaH in THF giving the free N-heterocyclic carbene N-mesityl-N′-pyridyl-imidazolin-2-ylidene 2 in 80% yield (starting from 1a). Imidazolium salt 1a reacts with RuCl₃ · xH₂O to give a racemic mixture of dinuclear di-μ-chloro bridged ruthenium complexes [(κ²-2)₂Ru(μ-Cl)₂Ru(κ²-2)₂]²⁺ [3a]²⁺. The carbene carbon atoms as well as the halides are arranged in cis-positions to each other whereas the nitrogen atoms adopt a trans-configuration. The di-μ-bromo bridged derivative [(κ²-2)₂Ru(μ-Br)₂Ru(κ²-2)₂]²⁺ [3b]²⁺ was obtained from RuCl₃ · xH₂O and 1b. The bridging halide ligands can be removed by the reaction with silver or sodium salts of bidentate Lewis acids. Complex [3a]²⁺ reacts with silver pyridylcarboxylate to give a racemic mixture of the mononuclear complex [4]⁺. Reaction of [3a]²⁺ with the sodium salt of l-proline resulted in a diastereomeric mixture of complexes [5]⁺. The free N-heterocyclic carbene 2 reacts with [FeCl₂(PPh₃)₂] to give after anion exchange with NaBPh₄ cis/cis/trans coordinated [Fe(κ²-2)₂(MeCN)₂](BPh₄)₂ [6](BPh₄)₂. The molecular structures of [3b](PF₆)₂, [4]PF₆ and [6](BPh₄)₂ · H₂O are reported.     

Two highly unsymmetrical tetradentate (N3O) Schiff base copper(II) complexes: Template synthesis,structural characterization,magnetic and computational studies

Two new copper(II) complexes, [Cu₂(L¹)₂](ClO₄)₂ (1) and [Cu(L²)(ClO₄)] (2), of the highly unsymmetrical tetradentate (N₃O) Schiff base ligands HL¹ and HL² (where HL¹ = N-(2-hydroxyacetophenone)-bis-3-aminopropylamine and HL² = N-(salicyldehydine)-bis-3-aminopropylamine) have been synthesised using a template method. Their single crystal X-ray structures show that in complex 1 two independent copper(II) centers are doubly bridged through phenoxo-O atoms (O1A and O1B) of the two ligands and each copper atom is five-coordinated with a distorted square pyramidal geometry. The asymmetric unit of complex 2 consists of two crystallographically independent N-(salicylidene)-bis(aminopropyl)amine-copper(II) molecules, A and B, with similar square pyramidal geometries. Cryomagnetic susceptibility measurements (5–300 K) on complex 1 reveal a distinct antiferromagnetic interaction with J = ?23.6 cm^?1, which is substantiated by a DFT calculation (J = ?27.6 cm^?1) using the B3LYP functional. Complex 1, immobilized over highly ordered hexagonal mesoporous silica, shows moderate catalytic activity for the epoxidation of cyclohexene and styrene in the presence of TBHP as an oxidant.     

Synthesis,characterization and fluorescence properties of hexanuclear zinc(II) complexes

Two hexanuclear zinc(II) complexes, [Zn₆(L¹)₂(μ₂-OH)₂(μ₂-CH₃COO)₈] · CH₃CN (1 · CH₃CN) and [Zn₆(L²)₂(μ₂-OH)₂(μ₂-CH₃COO)₈] · 4CH₃CN (2 · 4CH₃CN), where HL¹ = 4-methyl-2,6-bis(cyclohexylmethyliminomethyl)-phenol and HL² = 4-methyl-2,6-bis(1-naphthalylmethyliminomethyl)-phenol, have been synthesized and characterized by elemental analysis, FT-IR and fluorescence spectroscopic methods, and by X-ray diffraction analysis. In the asymmetric unit of complex 1, two of the three zinc atoms have pentacoordinate geometries and the other is tetrahedrally coordinated, whereas the three distinct Zn atoms in complex 2 adopt three different coordination environments, namely distorted octahedral, trigonal bipyramidal and tetrahedral. The fluorescence properties of the ligands and complexes have been investigated.     

Two distinct manganese molybdenum(V) phosphates directed by different organic amines

By employing different organic amines as structure-directing agents, two new distinct 3D porous inorganic frameworks based on molybdenum(V) phosphates and Mn^II, (H₂en)₂{[Mn(H₂O)]₂[MnMo₁₂O₂₄(OH)₆(H₂PO₄)₂(HPO₄)₄(PO₄)₂]}·7H₂O (en = ethylenediamine) (1) and (H₃dien)₂{[Mn(H₃O)₂][Mn₃Mo₁₂O₂₄(OH)₆(HPO₄)₂(PO₄)₆]}·5H₂O (dien = diethylenetriamine) (2), have been hydrothermally synthesized, and characterized by routine physical methods. In compound 1, Mn^II all adopt octahedral coordination mode and each sandwich cluster Mn[Mo₆P₄O₃₁]₂ (abbreviated as Mn[Mo₆P₄]₂) acts as an octa-dentate ligand linking eight Mn^II, which result in a 3D inorganic (4, 8)-connected framework with the (4⁶)(4¹⁰·6¹²·8⁶) topology. Compound 2 shows a 3D (4, 10)-connected framework with the (3¹·4⁴·6¹)(3⁴·4⁹·5⁷·6¹⁷·7⁴·8⁴) topology, in which Mn^II ions exhibit both tetrahedral and octahedral coordination modes, and each Mn[Mo₆P₄]₂ links ten Mn^II. Interestingly, there exist channels along the a and b axes in 1, while along the a and c axes in 2. The differences between the two compounds should be ascribed to the distinctions of the organic amines. Primary de-/rehydration behaviors and electrochemistry properties have also been studied for the two compounds.