Atomic‐Level Alloying and De‐alloying in Doped Gold Nanoparticles

Atomically precise alloying and de‐alloying processes for the formation of Ag–Au and Cu–Au nanoparticles of 25‐metal‐atom composition (referred to as Ag_xAu_25?x(SR)₁₈ and Cu_xAu_25?x(SR)₁₈, in which R=CH₂CH₂Ph) are reported. The identities of the particles were determined by matrix‐assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectroscopy (MALDI‐MS). Their structures were probed by fragmentation analysis in MALDI‐MS and comparison with the icosahedral structure of the homogold Au₂₅(SR)₁₈ nanoparticles (an icosahedral Au₁₃ core protected by a shell of Au₁₂(SR)₁₈). The Cu and Ag atoms were found to preferentially occupy the 13‐atom icosahedral sites, instead of the exterior shell. The number of Ag atoms in Ag_xAu_25?x(SR)₁₈ (x=0–8) was dependent on the molar ratio of Ag^I/Au^III precursors in the synthesis, whereas the number of Cu atoms in Cu_xAu_25?x(SR)₁₈ (x=0–4) was independent of the molar ratio of Cu^II/Au^III precursors applied. Interestingly, the Cu_xAu_25?x(SR)₁₈ nanoparticles show a spontaneous de‐alloying process over time, and the initially formed Cu_xAu_25?x(SR)₁₈ nanoparticles were converted to pure Au₂₅(SR)₁₈. This de‐alloying process was not observed in the case of alloyed Ag_xAu_25?x(SR)₁₈ nanoparticles. This contrast can be attributed to the stability difference between Cu_xAu_25?x(SR)₁₈ and Ag_xAu_25?x(SR)₁₈ nanoparticles. These alloyed nanoparticles are promising candidates for applications such as catalysis.     

Aurophilic Interactions in the Self‐Assembly of Gold Nanoclusters into Nanoribbons with Enhanced Luminescence

Aurophilic interactions (Au^I???Au^I) are crucial in directing the supramolecular self‐assembly of many gold(I) compounds; however, this intriguing chemistry has been rarely explored for the self‐assembly of nanoscale building blocks. Herein, we report on studies on aurophilic interactions in the structure‐directed self‐assembly of ultrasmall gold nanoparticles or nanoclusters (NCs, <2 nm) using [Au₂₅(SR)₁₈]^? (SR=thiolate ligand) as a model cluster. The self‐assembly of NCs is initiated by surface‐motif reconstruction of [Au₂₅(SR)₁₈]^? from short SR‐[Au^I‐SR]₂ units to long SR‐[Au^I‐SR]_x (x>2) staples accompanied by structure modification of the intrinsic Au₁₃ kernel. Such motif reconstruction increases the content of Au^I species in the protecting shell of Au NCs, providing the structural basis for directed aurophilic interactions, which promote the self‐assembly of Au NCs into well‐defined nanoribbons in solution. More interestingly, the compact structure and effective aurophilic interactions in the nanoribbons significantly enhance the luminescence intensity of Au NCs with an absolute quantum yield of 6.2 % at room temperature.     

Alternating Array Stacking of Ag26Au and Ag24Au Nanoclusters

An assembly strategy for metal nanoclusters using electrostatic interactions with weak interactions, such as C?H???π and π???π interactions in which cationic [Ag₂₆Au(2‐EBT)₁₈(PPh₃)₆]⁺ and anionic [Ag₂₄Au(2‐EBT)₁₈]^? nanoclusters gather and assemble in an unusual alternating array stacking structure is presented. [Ag₂₆Au(2‐EBT)₁₈(PPh₃)₆]⁺ [Ag₂₄Au(2‐EBT)₁₈]^? is a new compound type, a double nanocluster ion compound (DNIC). A single nanocluster ion compound (SNIC) [PPh₄]⁺ [Ag₂₄Au(2‐EBT)₁₈]^? was also synthesized, having a k‐vector‐differential crystallographic arrangement. [PPh₄]⁺ [Ag₂₄Au(2,4‐DMBT)₁₈]^? adopts a different assembly mode from both [Ag₂₆Au(2‐EBT)₁₈(PPh₃)₆]⁺ [Ag₂₄Au(2‐EBT)₁₈]^? and [PPh₄]⁺ [Ag₂₄Au(2‐EBT)₁₈]^?. Thus, the striking packing differences of [Ag₂₆Au(2‐EBT)₁₈(PPh₃)₆]⁺ [Ag₂₄Au(2‐EBT)₁₈]^?, [PPh₄]⁺ [Ag₂₄Au(2‐EBT)₁₈]^? and the existing [PPh₄]⁺ [Ag₂₄Au(2,4‐DMBT)₁₈]^? from each other indicate the notable influence of ligands and counterions on the self‐assembly of nanoclusters.     

Structure of the Au23−xAgx(S‐Adm)15 Nanocluster and Its Application for Photocatalytic Degradation of Organic Pollutants

Ligands play an important role in determining the atomic arrangement within the metal nanoclusters. Here, we report a new nanocluster [Au_23?xAg_x(S‐Adm)₁₅] protected by bulky adamantanethiol ligands which was obtained through a one‐pot synthesis. The total structure of [Au_23?xAg_x(S‐Adm)₁₅] comprises an Au_13?xAg_x icosahedral core, three Au₃(SR)₄ units, and one AgS₃ staple motif in contrast to the 15‐atom bipyramidal core previously seen in [Au_23?xAg_x(SR)₁₆]. UV/Vis spectroscopy indicates that the HOMO–LUMO gap of [Au_23?xAg_x(S‐Adm)₁₅] is 1.5 eV. DFT calculations reveal that [Au₁₉Ag₄(S‐Adm)₁₅] is the most stable structure among all structural possibilities. Benefitting from Ag doping, [Au_23?xAg_x(S‐Adm)₁₅] exhibits drastically improved photocatalytic activity for the degradation of rhodamine B (RhB) and phenol under visible‐light irradiation compared to Au₂₃ nanoclusters.     

Synthesis of Two‐Electron Bimetallic Cu–Ag and Cu–Au Clusters by using [Cu13(S2CNnBu2)6(C≡CPh)4]+ as a Template

Atomically precise Cu‐rich bimetallic superatom clusters have been synthesized by adopting a galvanic exchange strategy. [Cu@Cu₁₂(S₂CNⁿBu₂)₆(C≡CPh)₄][CuCl₂] ( 1 ) was used as a template to generate compositionally uniform clusters [M@Cu₁₂(S₂CNⁿBu₂)₆ (C≡CPh)₄][CuCl₂], where M=Ag ( 2 ), Au ( 3 ). Structures of 1 , 2 and 3 were determined by single crystal X‐ray diffraction and the results were supported by ESI‐MS. The anatomies of clusters 1 – 3 are very similar, with a centred cuboctahedral cationic core that is surrounded by six di‐butyldithiocarbamate (dtc) and four phenylacetylide ligands. The doped Ag and Au atoms were found to preferentially occupy the centre of the 13‐atom cuboctahedral core. Experimental and theoretical analyses of the synthesized clusters revealed that both Ag and Au doping result in significant changes in cluster stability, optical characteristics and enhancement in luminescence properties.     

Elucidating the Doping Effect on the Electronic Structure of Thiolate‐Protected Silver Superatoms by Photoelectron Spectroscopy

Gas‐phase photoelectron spectroscopy (PES) was conducted on [XAg₂₄(SPhMe₂)₁₈]^? (X=Ag, Au) and [YAg₂₄(SPhMe₂)₁₈]^2? (Y=Pd, Pt), which have a formal superatomic core (X@Ag₁₂)⁵⁺ or (Y@Ag₁₂)⁴⁺ with icosahedral symmetry. PES results show that superatomic orbitals in the (Au@Ag₁₂)⁵⁺ core remain unshifted with respect to those in the (Ag@Ag₁₂)⁵⁺ core, whereas the orbitals in the (Y@Ag₁₂)⁴⁺ (Y = Pd, Pt) core shift up in energy by about 1.4 eV. The remarkable doping effect of a single Y atom (Y=Pd, Pt) on the electronic structure of the chemically modified (Ag@Ag₁₂)⁵⁺ superatom was reproduced by theoretical calculations on simplified model systems and was ascribed to 1) the weaker binding of valence electrons in Y@(Ag⁺)₁₂ compared to Ag⁺@(Ag⁺)₁₂ due to the reduction in formal charge of the core potential, and 2) the upward shift of the apparent vacuum level due to the presence of a repulsive Coulomb barrier between [YAg₂₄(SPhMe₂)₁₈]^? and electron.     

Counter‐anion role in the formation of two supramolecular complexes: [Ag2(DPP)2](ClO4)2·CH3CN and [Ag2(DPP)2(NO3)2] {DPP is N‐[(diphenylphosphanyl)methyl]pyridin‐4‐amine}

The title compounds, bis{μ‐N‐[(diphenylphosphanyl)methyl]pyridin‐4‐amine‐κ²N¹:P}disilver bis(perchlorate) acetonitrile monosolvate, [Ag₂(C₁₈H₁₇N₂P)₂](ClO₄)₂·CH₃CN, (1), and bis{μ‐N‐[(diphenylphosphanyl)methyl]pyridin‐4‐amine‐κ²N¹:P}bis[(nitrato‐κ²O,O)silver], [Ag₂(C₁₈H₁₇N₂P)₂(NO₃)₂], (2), each contain disilver macrocyclic [Ag₂(C₁₈H₁₇N₂P)₂]²⁺ cations lying about inversion centres. The cations are constructed by two N‐[(diphenylphosphanyl)methyl]pyridin‐4‐amine (DPP) ligands linking two Ag⁺ cations in a head‐to‐tail fashion. In (1), the unique Ag⁺ cation has a near‐linear coordination geometry consisting of one pyridine N atom and one P atom from two different DPP ligands. Two ClO₄⁻ anions doubly bridge two metallomacrocycles through Ag...O and N—H...O weak interactions to form a chain extending in the c direction. The half‐occupancy acetonitrile molecule lies with its methyl C atom on a twofold axis and makes a weak N...Ag contact. In (2), there are two independent [Ag(C₁₈H₁₇N₂P)]⁺ cations. The nitrate anions weakly chelate to each Ag⁺ cation, leading to each Ag⁺ cation having a distorted tetrahedral coordination geometry consisting of one pyridine N atom and one P atom from two different DPP ligands, and two chelating nitrate O atoms. Each dinuclear [Ag₂(C₁₈H₁₇N₂P)₂(NO₃)₂] molecule acts as a four‐node to bridge four adjacent equivalent molecules through N—H...O interactions, forming a two‐dimensional sheet parallel to the bc plane. Each sheet contains dinuclear molecules involving just Ag1 or Ag2 and these two types of sheet are stacked in an alternating fashion. The sheets containing Ag1 all lie near x = , , etc, while those containing Ag2 all lie near x = 0, 1, 2 etc. Thus, the two independent sheets are arranged in an alternating sequence at x = 0, , 1, etc. These two different supramolecular structures result from the different geometric conformations of the templating anions which direct the self‐assembly of the cations and anions.     

An All‐Alkynyl Protected 74‐Nuclei Silver(I)–Copper(I)‐Oxo Nanocluster: Oxo‐Induced Hierarchical Bimetal Aggregation and Anisotropic Surface Ligand Orientation

The hardness of oxo ions (O^2?) means that coinage‐metal (Cu, Ag, Au) clusters supported by oxo ions (O^2?) are rare. Herein, a novel μ₄‐oxo supported all‐alkynyl‐protected silver(I)–copper(I) nanocluster [Ag_74?xCu_xO₁₂(PhC≡C)₅₀] ( NC‐1 , avg. x=37.9) is characterized. NC‐1 is the highest nuclearity silver–copper heterometallic cluster and contains an unprecedented twelve interstitial μ₄‐oxo ions. The oxo ions originate from the reduction of nitrate ions by NaBH₄. The oxo ions induce the hierarchical aggregation of Cu^I and Ag^I ions in the cluster, forming the unique regioselective distribution of two different metal ions. The anisotropic ligand coverage on the surface is caused by the jigsaw‐puzzle‐like cluster packing incorporating rare intermolecular C?H???metal agostic interactions and solvent molecules. This work not only reveals a new category of high‐nuclearity coinage‐metal clusters but shows the special clustering effect of oxo ions in the assembly of coinage‐metal clusters.     

Hollow Versus Hydrogen-Occupied Icosahedral Cages of Coinage–Metal Clusters

It is suggested that the hollow coinage–metal icosahedral cage of the [Ag₄₄(SR)₃₀]^4? tetraanion (1a) may be occupied by two hydrogen atoms, giving rise to a dihydridic cluster [H₂Ag₄₄(SR)₃₀]^4? tetraanion (2b). As a consequence, two series of clusters, with different electron counts, can be formed by chemical means: the 18-electron series [H _x Ag₄₄(SR)₃₀]^(4?x)? via stepwise protonation of 1a and the 20-electron series [H _x Ag₄₄(SR)₃₀]^(6?x)? via stepwise deprotonation of 2b (here x = 0, 1, 2). Both series are closed-shell Jelliumatic clusters and expected to be stable. The corresponding members of these two series (for a given x value) are related by a two-electron reduction. These pairs raise the possibility of the hollow icosahedral metal cages in housing a number of hydrogen atoms, either via stepwise protonations or by absorption of hydrogen molecules.     

Au130−xAgx Nanoclusters with Non‐Metallicity: A Drum of Silver‐Rich Sites Enclosed in a Marks‐Decahedral Cage of Gold‐Rich Sites

The synthesis and structure of atomically precise Au_130?xAg_x (average x=98) alloy nanoclusters protected by 55 ligands of 4‐tert‐butylbenzenethiolate are reported. This large alloy structure has a decahedral M₅₄ (M=Au/Ag) core. The Au atoms are localized in the truncated Marks decahedron. In the core, a drum of Ag‐rich sites is found, which is enclosed by a Marks decahedral cage of Au‐rich sites. The surface is exclusively Ag?SR; X‐ray absorption fine structure analysis supports the absence of Au?S bonds. The optical absorption spectrum shows a strong peak at 523 nm, seemingly a plasmon peak, but fs spectroscopic analysis indicates its non‐plasmon nature. The non‐metallicity of the Au_130?xAg_x nanocluster has set up a benchmark to study the transition to metallic state in the size evolution of bimetallic nanoclusters. The localized Au/Ag binary architecture in such a large alloy nanocluster provides atomic‐level insights into the Au?Ag bonds in bimetallic nanoclusters.     

Front Cover: Safe Entry to Ag(I)/Ag(III) Mixed Valence Salts Containing the Homoleptic Ag(III) Anion [Ag(CF3)4]− (Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 19/2023)

The synthesis of Naumann's Ag^I/Ag^III mixed valence salt [Ag^I]⁺[Ag^III(CF₃)₄]⁻ ( Ag-1 ) is revisited. Ag-1 is now safely available in half gram scale upon 2e⁻ oxidation of AgF in presence of CF₃SiMe₃ and ambient air. In addition to its unprecedented crystallographic characterization, the use of Ag-1 to build the novel Ag^I/Ag^III salts [ Ag (bpy)₂] -1 , [ Ag (18-crown-6)₂] -1 , [ Ag -crypt-222] -1 and [ Ag (PCy₃)₂] -1 is herein reported, alongside their characterization by NMR, single crystal X-ray diffraction (Sc-XRD) and elemental analysis (EA). The utility of the currently affordable Ag-1 in gold(I) catalysis was demonstrated by the excellent catalytic activity displayed by [{ Au (PPh₃)}₂(μ-Cl)] -1 and [ Au (PPh₃)] -1 in the 5-exo-dig cyclization of N-propargylbenzamide ( 2 ). These cationic Au^I catalysts are accessible from (PPh₃)AuCl and Ag-1 , and outperform the activity of the well-known benchmark catalyst (PPh₃)AuNTf₂.     

Unraveling the Impact of Gold(I)–Thiolate Motifs on the Aggregation‐Induced Emission of Gold Nanoclusters

Aggregation‐induced emission (AIE) provides an efficient strategy to synthesize highly luminescent metal nanoclusters (NCs), however, rational control of emission energy and intensity of metal NCs is still challenging. This communication reveals the impact of surface Au^I‐thiolate motifs on the AIE properties of Au NCs, by employing a series of water‐soluble glutathione (GSH)‐coordinated Au complexes and NCs as a model ([Au₁₀SR₁₀], [Au₁₅SR₁₃], [Au₁₈SR₁₄], and [Au₂₅SR₁₈]^?, SR=thiolate ligand). Spectroscopic investigations show that the emission wavelength of Au NCs is adjustable from visible to the near‐infrared II (NIR‐II) region by controlling the length of the Au^I‐SR motifs on the NC surface. Decreasing the length of Au^I‐SR motifs also changes the origin of cluster luminescence from AIE‐type phosphorescence to Au⁰‐core‐dictated fluorescence. This effect becomes more prominent when the degree of aggregation of Au NCs increases in solution.     

catena‐Poly­[[(di‐2‐pyridyl­amine)­silver(I)]‐μ‐nicotinato] and catena‐poly­[[(di‐2‐pyridyl­amine)silver(I)]‐μ‐2,6‐di­hydroxy­benzoato]

In catena‐poly­[[(di‐2‐pyridyl­amine‐κ²N,N′)silver(I)]‐μ‐nico­tinato‐κ²N:O], [Ag(C₆H₄NO₂)(C₁₀H₉N₃)]_n, the Ag^I atom is tetracoordinated by two N atoms from the di‐2‐pyridyl­amine (BPA) ligand [Ag—N = 2.3785 (18) and 2.3298 (18) Å] and by one N atom and one carboxyl­ate O atom from nicotinate ligands [Ag—N = 2.2827 (15) Å and Ag—O = 2.3636 (14) Å]. Bridging by nicotinate N and O atoms generates a polymeric chain structure, which extends along [100]. The carboxyl O atom not bonded to the Ag atom takes part in an intrachain C—H⋯O hydrogen bond, further stabilizing the chain. Pairs of chains are linked by N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds to generate ribbons. There are no π–π interactions in this complex. In catena‐poly­[[(di‐2‐pyridyl­amine‐κ²N,N′)silver(I)]‐μ‐2,6‐di­hydroxy­benzoato‐κ²O¹:O²], [Ag(C₇H₅O₄)(C₁₀H₉N₃)]_n, the Ag^I atom has a distorted tetrahedral coordination, with three strong bonds to two pyridine N atoms from the BPA ligand [Ag—N = 2.286 (5) and 2.320 (5) Å] and to one carboxyl­ate O atom from the 2,6‐di­hydroxy­benzoate ligand [Ag—O = 2.222 (4) Å]; the fourth, weaker, Ag‐atom coordination is to one of the phenol O atoms [Ag⋯O = 2.703 (4) Å] of an adjacent moiety, and this interaction generates a polymeric chain along [100]. Pairs of chains are linked about inversion centers by N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds to form ribbons, within which there are π–π interactions. The ribbons are linked about inversion centers by pairs of C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds and additional π–π interactions between inversion‐related pairs of 2,6‐di­hydroxy­benzoate ligands to generate a three‐dimensional network.     

Same Magic Number but Different Arrangement: Alkynyl‐Protected Au25 with D3 Symmetry

Two homoleptic alkynyl‐protected gold clusters with compositions of Na[Au₂₅(C≡CAr)₁₈] and (Ph₄P)[Au₂₅(C≡CAr)₁₈] (Na? 1 and Ph₄P? 1 , Ar=3,5‐bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl) were synthesized via a direct reduction method. 1 is a magic cluster analogous to [Au₂₅(SR)₁₈]^? in terms of electron counts and metal‐to‐ligand ratio. Single‐crystal structure analysis reveals that 1 has an identical Au₁₃ kernel to [Au₂₅(SR)₁₈]^?, but adopts a distinctly different arrangement of the six peripheral dimer staple motifs. The steric hindrance of alkynyl ligands is responsible for the D₃ arrangement of Au₂₅. The introduction of alkynyl also significantly changes the optical absorption features of the nanocluster as supported by DFT calculations. This magic cluster confirms that there is a similar but quite different parallel alkynyl‐protected metal cluster universe in comparison to the thiolated one.     

Silbermercaptide und -mercaptokomplexe

The complex formation of silver(I) has been studied with the anions of simple mercaptans RSH which have been rendered soluble by replacing some H in the substituent R by OH. All equilibria constants refer to a solvent of ionic strength μ = 0,1 and 20°C. Monothioglycol HO? CH₂? CH₂? SH (pK = 9.48) forms an amorphous insoluble mercaptide {AgSR} (s), ionic product [Ag⁺] [SR^?] = 10^?19.7. The solution in equilibrium with the solid contains the molecule AgSR at a constant concentration of 10^?6.7 M which furnishes the formation constant of the 1:1-complex: K₁ = 10^{13. 0}. The solid is soluble in excess of mercaptide (AgSR+SR^? → Ag(SR)₂^?: K₂ = 10^{4. 8}) as well as in an excess of silver ion (AgSR + Ag⁺ → Ag₂SR⁺K ≈? 10⁶). With the bulky monothiopentaerythrite (HO? CH₂? )₃C? CH₂? SH (pK = 9.89) no precipitation occurs with silver when the mercaptan concentration is below 10^{?3. 2}M. A single polynuclear Ag₁₀(SR)₉⁺ (β_10.9 = 10¹⁷⁵) is formed in acidic solutions which breaks up with the formation of Ag₂SR⁺ (β_2.1 = 10^19.0) when an excess of silver ion is added. Below the mononuclear wall ([RS]_total < 10^?6) Ag₂SR⁺ is formed via the mononuclear AgSR (K₁ = 10¹³). At higher mercaptan concentrations ([RS]_tot > 10^?3.2) an amorphous precipitate is formed which has almost the same solubility product as silver thioglycolate ([Ag⁺] [SR^?] = 10^?19.1). Apparently silver(I) forms with mercaptans always the complexes Ag₂SR⁺, AgSR and Ag(SR)₂^?. Above the mononuclear wall, these species condense to chain-like polynuclears which are cations Ag(SRAg)_n⁺ in presence of an excess of Ag⁺, and anions SR (AgSR)_n^? when the concentration [RS^?] is larger than [Ag⁺]. Usually n becomes rapidly very large as soon as the condensation starts (n → ∞: precipitate). The decanuclear Ag(SRAg)₉⁺ formed with thiopentaerythrit is somewhat more stable than the shorter chains (n < 9) and larger chains (n > 9), because it can tangle up to a ball by coordination of bridging mercapto-sulfur to the terminal silver ions (figure 12, page 2179). This ball seems to be further stabilized by hydrogen bonds between the many alcoholic OH groups of the substituent R = (HO? CH₂)₃C? CH₂? . The stability of the bonds Ag? S, however, is little influenced by the substituent R which carries the mercaptide sulfure.     

Central Doping of a Foreign Atom into the Silver Cluster for Catalytic Conversion of CO2 toward C−C Bond Formation

Clusters with an exact number of atoms are of particular interest in catalysis. Their catalytic behaviors can be potentially altered with the addition or removal of a single atom. Now the effects of doping with a single foreign atom (Au, Pd, and Pt) into the core of an Ag cluster with 25 atoms on the catalytic properties are explored, where the foreign atom is protected by 24 Ag atoms (Au@Ag₂₄, Pd@Ag₂₄, and Pt@Ag₂₄). The central doping of a single atom into the Ag₂₅ cluster has a substantial influence on the catalytic performance in the carboxylation reaction of CO₂ with terminal alkyne through C?C bond formation to produce propiolic acid. These studies reveal that the catalytic properties of the cluster catalysts can be dramatically changed with the subtle alteration by a single atom away from the active sites.     

catena‐Poly[[silver(I)‐μ‐[9,10‐bis(1H‐benzimidazol‐1‐ylmethyl)anthracene]‐κ2N3:N3′] bis(nitrato‐κO)silver(I)]

Yellow needle‐shaped crystals of the title compound, {[Ag(C₃₀H₂₂N₄)][Ag(NO₃)₂]}_n, were obtained by the reaction of AgNO₃ and 9,10‐bis(benzimidazol‐1‐ylmethyl)anthracene (L) in a 2:1 ratio. The asymmetric unit consists of two Ag^I cations, one half L ligand and one nitrate anion. One Ag^I cation occupies a crystallographic inversion centre and links two N‐atom donors of two distinct L ligands to form an infinite one‐dimensional coordination polymer. The second Ag^I cation lies on a crystallographic twofold axis and is coordinated by two O‐atom donors of two nitrate anions to form an [Ag(NO₃)₂]⁻ counter‐ion. The polymeric chains are linked into a supramolecular framework via weak Ag...O [3.124 (5) Å] and Ag...π (2.982 Å) interactions (π is the centroid of an outer anthracene benzene ring). The π interactions contain two short Ag...C contacts [2.727 (6) and 2.765 (6) Å], which can be considered to define Ag–η²‐anthracene bonding interactions. In comparison with a previously reported binuclear Ag^I complex [Du, Hu, Zhang, Zeng & Bu (2008). CrystEngComm, 10 , 1866–1874], this new one‐dimensional coordination polymer was obtained by changing the metal–ligand ratio during the synthesis.     

A 200‐fold Quantum Yield Boost in the Photoluminescence of Silver‐Doped AgxAu25−x Nanoclusters: The 13 th Silver Atom Matters

The rod‐shaped Au₂₅ nanocluster possesses a low photoluminescence quantum yield (QY=0.1 %) and hence is not of practical use in bioimaging and related applications. Herein, we show that substituting silver atoms for gold in the 25‐atom matrix can drastically enhance the photoluminescence. The obtained Ag_xAu_25?x (x=1–13) nanoclusters exhibit high quantum yield (QY=40.1 %), which is in striking contrast with the normally weakly luminescent Ag_xAu_25?x species (x=1–12, QY=0.21 %). X‐ray crystallography further determines the substitution sites of Ag atoms in the Ag_xAu_25?x cluster through partial occupancy analysis, which provides further insight into the mechanism of photoluminescence enhancement.     

Low-dimensional Compounds Containing Cyano Groups. XIII. Structural–spectral Correlation of Copper Dicyanoargentates

The new mixed-valence mixed-metal complex Cu(py)₆Cu₂Ag₂(CN)₆ (py = pyridine) possesses a three dimensional polymeric crystal structure. The Cu(I) atom is tetrahedrally coordinated by two nitrogen atoms of pyridine molecules, by one nitrogen atom of the dicyanoargentate anion and by one carbon atom of the cyano group. Both the dicyanoargentate anion and the cyano group bridge the Cu(I) atom with neighboring Cu(II) atoms. These are hexacoordinated in the form of an elongated tetragonal bipyramid. The equatorial plane is formed by two nitrogen atoms from two pyridine molecules and two nitrogen atoms from bridging cyano groups. Axial positions are occupied by nitrogen atoms of the bridging [Ag(CN₂]⁻ anions. Correlation between structures of the title compound and seven other dicyanoargentates with their i.r. spectra has been studied. The coordination mode of [Ag(CN₂]⁻ anions in compounds Cu_8-xAg_x(tn)₃(CN)₁₀ x = 0.25, Cu(3-Mepy)₂Ag₂(CN)₄, Cu(py)₂Ag₂(CN)₄ and Cu(py)₄Ag₂(CN)₄ (tn is 1,3-diaminopropane, 3-Mepy is 3-methylpyridine) is predicted based on this correlation.     

EPR‐spektroskopische Charakterisierung (X‐, Q‐Band) monomerer AgII‐ und AuII‐Komplexe der Thiakronenether [12]anS4, [16]anS4, [18]anS6 und [27]anS9

EPR Spectroscopic Characterization (X‐, Q‐Band) of Monomeric Ag^II‐ and Au^II‐Complexes of the Thiacrownethers [12]aneS₄, [16]aneS₄, [18]aneS₆ and [27]aneS₉ The reaction of the prepared Ag^I complexes of the thiacrownethers [12]aneS₄, [16]aneS₄, [18]aneS₆ and [27]aneS₉ with c. H₂SO₄ as well as the reaction of [Au^IIICl₄]^‐ with [18]aneS₆ and [27]aneS₉ leads to labile Ag^II‐ (4d⁹, ^{107, 109}Ag: I=1/2) and Au^II‐ (5d⁹, ¹⁹⁷Au: I=3/2) thiacrownether complexes, respectively, which were characterized by X‐ and Q‐band EPR. The EPR spectra of [Ag^II([12]anS₄)]²⁺ and [Ag^II([18]anS₆)]²⁺ were reinvestigated. According to an analysis of the spin‐density distribution only 20 ‐ 25 % is located on the Ag or Au atoms. Most of the spin‐density was found to be on the S donor atoms of the thiacrownethers. The high delocalization of the spin‐density leads certainly to a noticeable reduction of the Ag^I/Ag^II redox potential and is considered as being mainly responsible for the easy accessibility of the Ag^II compounds.