化学计量一级站举办第十六期检定员培训班

1998年 10月 8日至 18日 ,根据国防科工委考核部的计划 ,化学计量一级站在济南培训中心举办了国防计量检定员培训班 ,对来自全国国防系统二级计量技术机构的 39名学习人员 ,分别进行了分光、酸度、电导、色谱四个项目的培训考核 ,取得了优异的成绩。化学计量一级站领导对优秀学员进行了表彰并颁发了荣誉证书。在结业式上 ,二炮化学计量站的学员代表培训班全体学员对化学计量一级站领导及教职工、对化学计量一级站多年来为国防系统二级单位提供的大量技术服务表示感谢。化学计量一级站举办第十六期检定员培训班@辛泉友…     

化学计量一级站量值传递工作及经验

介绍了国防科工委化学计量一级站为保证化学量值的准确与统一,在计量标准建立、标准物质研制、测量方法研究等方面所做的工作和经验。     

国防理化检测人员培训体系的建立

论述了建立国防理化检测人员培训体系的必要性.根据国防军工集团理化检测人员工作岗位的特点,提出了构建国防军工集团理化检测人员培训体系的方法.     

化学计量一级站量值传递工作及经验

介绍了国防科工委化学计量一级站为保证化学量值的准确与统一，在计量标准建立、标准物质研制、测定量方法研究等方面所做的工作和经验。     

化学计量的量值传递与溯源

简要叙述化学计量的特点 ,分析了化学计量的量值传递与溯源     

化学计量及其进展

扼要介绍了化学计量主要研究内容和量传方法。并从化学计量技术机构,基准、标准装置,标准物质,检定规程和化学计量学等方面,叙述了化学计量的进展概况。     

国防科技工业应用化学一级计量站全国化工标准物质委员会标准物质研究开发中心

<正>国防科技工业应用化学一级计量站(原国防科工委化学计量一级站)是1986年建于中国兵器工业第五三研究所的专业计量技术机构,同时也是兵器非金属材料理化检测中心、国家进出口商品非金属材料认可实验室、国防计量2501校准实验室、全国化工标准物质委员会标准物质研究开发中心。目前,专门从事化学计量的人员196人。其中研究员人、高级工程师32人。拥有各种分析测试仪器150余台,建有国防计量最高标准30余项。主要承担国防科工委化学计量乖研任务;国防系统化学量值传递,计量标准的考核、复查、人员培训;国防大型试验基地现场计量保证;标准物质的研制、定值、发放;进出口非金属材料检验:化学产品测试及未知样品的剖析等。先后完成计量科研课题40余项,有20余项达到巨     

国防科技工业应用化学一级计量站 全国化工标准物质委员会标准物质研究开发中心

<正>国防科技工业应用化学一级计量站(原国防科工委化学计量一级站)是1986年建于中国兵器工业第五三研究所的专业计量技术机构,同时也是兵器非金属材料理化检测中心、国家进出口商品非金属材料认可实验室、国防计量2501校准实验室、全国化工标准物质委员会标准物质研究开发中心。目前,专门从事化学计量的人员196人,其中研究员15人、高级工程师32人。拥有各种分析测试仪器150余台,建有国防计量最高标准30余项。主要承担国防科工委化学计量科研任务;国防系统化学量值传递,计量标准的考核、复查、人员培训;国防大型试验基地现场计量保证;标准物质的研制、定值、发放;进出口非金属材料检验;化学产品测试及未知样品的剖析等。先后完成计量科研课题40余项,有20余项达到国     

化学计量研究进展

叙述了化学计量的特点、作用和重要性及其研究内容,探讨了标准物质量值传递系统及实现标准物质量值溯源性的途径,阐述了建立化学测量溯源性的重要性、困难性、复杂性及基本设想和途径,并对化学计量中物质的量“摩尔”进行了简要论述。     

军民融合式军事计量发展现状及未来发展趋势

介绍了国内外军事计量技术的发展现状,以及新时期军事计量发展的方向——军民融合式军事计量。对军民融合式军事计量发展的背景和现阶段计量领域中存在的问题进行分析和讨论,阐述了推进军事计量军民融合式发展的重要意义。论述了在计量保障领域进行军民融合的益处和可行性,并在加强内部沟通、人才队伍建设、资源优化配置等几个方面就如何推进其发展提出了自己的观点和看法。     

Chemical measurement and the law: metrology and quality issues

To facilitate just and sound decisions legal measurements must be reliable. The aim of this paper is to explore how this is currently achieved and how it might be better done. It considers the different types of legal proceedings, the role of chemical measurement, level of proof, the different types of chemical measurement, measurement units, the role of government, the chemical measurement industry and its control, legal metrology and the development of a measurement system based on metrological principles. It is argued that recent developments provide the basis for a robust support system, that but more needs to be done. It is also argued that the conventional approach to legal metrology has little place in chemical measurement, but that some controls are needed in some areas. In particular, a harmonised approach to international measurement standards is advocated. Received: 29 December 2000 Accepted: 8 January 2001     

Measurement traceability and US IVD manufacturers: the impact of metrology

A goal of clinical laboratory science is to produce accurate and comparable patient test results for a specimen independent of analytical methodology. The In Vitro Diagnostics Directive in Europe has provided the impetus for the U.S. in vitro diagnostic (IVD) industry to adapt the concepts of Metrology, the science of measurement, including measurement traceability and measurement uncertainty. The joint committee for traceability in laboratory medicine has provided a valuable database of internationally recognized reference materials and methods and reference laboratories. Much of the responsibility for measurement traceability falls on IVD manufacturers, but all global stakeholders, including the clinical laboratory profession, government Regulatory bodies, metrology institutes, and the providers of EQA/PT surveys, must cooperate to progress toward this goal. The adaptation of the concepts of Metrology to the clinical laboratory is an appropriate and logical development and it will continue in the twenty-first century.     

化学计量体系的特点及实现有效化学测量的途径

叙述了有效化学测量的意义、化学计量体系的组成和特点,介绍了实现有效化学测量的途径以及标准物质在化学测量中的作用。     

21世纪化学计量事业展望

科学技术的迅猛发展,使化学计量已成为高度的数字化测量和高可信度测量的结合,化学计量对人身安全与健康、环境保护、农业发展、产品质量以及国家经济贸易的影响越来越大。因此,拓宽研究领域,增强市场意识,建立与国际协调一致的国家化学测量溯源体系已成为我国化学计量发展所面临的迫切任务。     

Stoichiometry and chemical metrology: Karl Fischer reaction

 Stoichiometry of analytical reactions is discussed as an important element of many primary methods (gravimetry, volumetry, spectrophotometry, etc.) and therefore, of chemical metrology as a whole. Variations in stoichiometry caused by non-equilibrium conditions, by changes in the reaction medium or by other factors can be a source of the dominant uncertainty component in the analytical measurement. Such a situation is illustrated with the Karl Fischer (KF) reaction which is widely used in aquametry. Two kinds of solvents used as a part of the reaction medium – alcohols and amides – are compared. The influence of the media on the stoichiometry of the reaction and, correspondingly, on the titre of the KF reagent is evaluated. Received: 4 November 1998 · Accepted: 22 December 1998     

On practical metrology and chemical analysis: etalons and traceability systems

 National measurement systems are infrastructures to ensure, for each nation, a consistent and internationally recognised basis for measurement. Such complex systems have historical, technical, legal, organisational and institutional aspects to connect scientific metrology with practical measurements. Underlying any valid measurement is a chain of comparisons linking the measurement to an accepted standard. The ways the links are forged and the etalons (measurement standards) to which they connect are defining characteristics of all measurement systems. This is often referred to as traceability which aims at basing measurements in common measurement units – a key issue for the integration of quantitative chemical analysis with the evolving physical and engineering measurement systems. Adequate traceability and metrological control make possible new technical capabilities and new levels of quality assurance and confidence by users in the accuracy and integrity of quantitative analytical results. Traceability for chemical measurements is difficult to achieve and harder to demonstrate. The supply of appropriate etalons is critical to the development of metrology systems for chemical analysis. An approach is suggested that involves the development of networks of specialised reference laboratories able to make matrix-independent reference measurements on submitted samples, which may then be used as reference materials by an originating laboratory using its practical measurement procedures. Received: 31 July 1995 Accepted: 19 August 1995     

Quality and the development of reference materials, including the role of traceability and comparability

The global recognition that quality is an economic issue is requiring analytical chemists to look at the chemical measurement process in a way that has not been done before. Much work has been done in certifying reference materials, writing measurement protocols, creating measurement networks, developing analytical measurement techniques and other efforts to make good measurements. This article explores the meaning of quality in chemical measurements and discusses quality in terms of credibility, reliability, traceability and comparability. The importance of understanding the contribution of comparability and traceability to quality in chemical measurements and chemical metrology is emphasized.     

Traceability and uncertainty – A comparison of their application in chemical and physical measurement

 Establishment of the traceability and the evaluation of the uncertainty of the result of a measurement are essential in order to establish its comparability and fitness for purpose. There are both similarities and differences in the way that the concepts of traceability and uncertainty have been utilised in physical and chemical measurement. The International Committee of Weights and Measures (CIPM) have only in the last decade set up programmes in chemical metrology similar to those that have been in existence for physical metrology for over a century. However, analytical chemists over that same period have also developed techniques, based on the concepts of traceability and uncertainty, to ensure that their results are comparable and fit for purpose. This paper contrasts these developments in physical and chemical metrology and identifies areas where these two disciplines can learn from each other.     

Comparability and recognition of chemical measurement results – an international goal

As a consequence of the globalisation of trade and industry and other human activities, reliability of and confidence in measurement results is increasingly required, also in the field of chemical analysis, so that measurements made in one country will be accepted in other countries without the necessity to repeat them. The prerequisite for confidence is comparability on the basis of known uncertainties which in turn are based on traceability to recognised references. Traceability structures for chemical measurements are required which, by providing calibration means traceable to national standards, allow uncertainty statements to be made at field level, thus establishing comparability. Such traceability structures are now being developed in all industrialised countries. To ensure international comparability, mutual recognition of the national activities in metrology in chemistry is required in addition. The Mutual Recognition Agreement (MRA) for national measurement standards and calibration certificates issued by national metrology institutes, which is currently under way within the framework of the Metre Convention, aimes at providing the necessary international confidence for all kinds of measurements. The field of chemical analysis is included in the international metrological infrastructure through the new Consultative Committee for Amount of Substance (CCQM). Carefully selected key comparison measurements, which cover the most important areas where traceability is required, and which are carried out by national metrology institutes in cooperation with other national institutes entrusted with the provision of part of the national references for chemical measurements, form the basis for declarations of equivalence under the MRA. The results of the first key comparisons and studies carried out so far clearly show that the group of laboratories involved in the key comparisons is capable of establishing the international references (key comparison reference values) for chemical measurements with sufficient accuracy, also in complicated matrices.