Heterodinukleare Komplexe: Synthese und Kristallstrukturen von [RuRh(μ‐CO)(CO)4(μ‐PtBu2)(tBu2PH)], [RuRh(μ‐CO)(CO)3(μ‐PtBu2)(μ‐Ph2PCH2PPh2)] und [CoRh(CO)4(μ‐H)(μ‐PtBu2)(tBu2PH)]

Heterobinuclear Complexes: Synthesis and X‐ray Crystal Structures of [RuRh(μ‐CO)(CO)₄(μ‐P^tBu₂)(^tBu₂PH)], [RuRh(μ‐CO)(CO)₃(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂)], and [CoRh(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(^tBu₂PH)] [Ru₃Rh(CO)₇(μ₃‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)₂(^tBu₂PH)(μ‐Cl)₂] ( 2 ) yields by cluster degradation under CO pressure as main product the heterobinuclear complex [RuRh(μ‐CO)(CO)₄(μ‐P^tBu₂)(^tBu₂PH)] ( 4 ). The compound crystallizes in the orthorhombic space group Pcab with a = 15.6802(15), b = 28.953(3), c = 11.8419(19) Å and V = 5376.2(11) ų. The reaction of 4 with dppm (Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂) in THF at room temperature affords in good yields [RuRh(μ‐CO)(CO)₃(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 7 ). 7 crystallizes in the triclinic space group P 1 with a = 9.7503(19), b = 13.399(3), c = 15.823(3) Å and V = 1854.6 ų. Moreover single crystals of [CoRh(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(^tBu₂PH)] ( 9 ) could be obtained and the single‐crystal X‐ray structure analysis revealed that 9 crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2₁/a with a = 11.611(2), b = 13.333(2), c = 18.186(3) Å and V = 2693.0(8) ų.     

A Manganese(II) Coordination Polymer with Ditopic Bis(pyrazol‐1‐yl)borate Bridges

The synthesis and characterization of the ditopic bis(pyrazol‐1‐yl)borate ligand Li₂[p‐C₆H₄(B(C₆F₅)pz₂)₂] is reported (pz = pyrazol‐1‐yl). Compared to the corresponding t‐butyl derivative Li₂[p‐C₆H₄(B(t‐Bu)pz₂)₂], the C₆F₅‐substituted scorpionate is significantly more stable towards hydrolysis. Reaction of Li₂[p‐C₆H₄(B(C₆F₅)pz₂)₂] with two equivalents of MnCl₂ leads to the formation of coordination polymers {(MnCl₂)₂(Li(THF)₃)₂[p‐C₆H₄(B(C₆F₅)pz₂)₂]}_∞ featuring penta‐coordinate Mn^II ions chelated by one bis(pyrazol‐1‐yl)borate fragment and further bonded to three chloride ions. Two of the three chloride ions are also coordinated to a neighbouring Mn^II ion; the third chloro ligand is shared between the Mn^II centre and a Li(THF)₃ moiety.     

Reactions of tBu2P–PLi–PtBu2 with [(Et3P)2MCl2] (M = Ni,Pd, Pt). Synthesis and Properties of [(1,2‐η‐tBu2P=P–PtBu2)M(PEt3)Cl] (M=Ni,Pd)

^tBu₂P–PLi–P^tBu₂·2THF reacts with [cis‐(Et₃P)₂MCl₂] (M = Ni, Pd) yielding [(1,2‐η‐^tBu₂P=P–P^tBu₂)Ni(PEt₃)Cl] and [(1,2‐η‐^tBu₂P=P–P^tBu2)Pd(PEt₃)Cl], respectively. ^tBu₂P– PLi–P^tBu₂ undergoes an oxidation process and the ^tBu₂P–P–P^tBu₂ ligand adopts in the products the structure of a side‐on bonded 1,1‐di‐tert‐butyl‐2‐(di‐tert‐butylphosphino)diphosphenium cation with a short P–P bond. Surprisingly, the reaction of ^tBu₂P–PLi–P^tBu₂·2THF with [cis‐(Et₃P)₂PtCl₂] does not yield [(1,2‐η‐^tBu₂P=P–P^tBu₂)Pt(PEt₃)Cl].     

Reactions of Lithium Salts of Triphosphanes tBu2P–PLi–PtBu2 and tBu2P–PLi–P(NEt2)2 with Metal Complexes [(R3P)2MCl2] (M = Ni,Pd, Pt,R3P = Et3P,pTol3P,Ph2EtP,iPr3P)

tBu₂P–PLi–PtBu₂ · 2THF reacts with [(R₃P)₂MCl₂] (M = Pt, Pd, Ni; R₃P = Et₃P, pTol₃P, Ph₂EtP, iPr₃P) to yield isomers of [(1,2‐η‐tBu₂P=P–PtBu₂)M(PR₃)Cl], in which the tBu₂P–P–PtBu₂ ligand adopts the arrangement of a side‐on bonded 1,1‐di‐tert‐butyl‐2‐(di‐tert‐butylphosphanyl)diphosphenium cation. tBu₂P–PLi–P(NEt₂)₂ · 2THF reacts with [(R₃P)₂MCl₂] but does not form complexes with a tBu₂P–P–P(NEt₂)₂ moiety, however, splitting of a P–P(NEt₂)₂ bond of the parent triphosphane takes place.     

Darstellung und Kristallstrukturen von tBu‐substituierten Disiloxanen des Typus tBu2SiX‐O‐SiYtBu2 (X = Y = OH,Br; X = OH,Y = H) und den Addukten tBu3SiOH·(HO3SCF3)0.5·H2O und tBu3SiOLi·(LiO3SCF3)2·(H2O)2

Syntheses and Crystal Structures of tBu‐substituted Disiloxanes tBu₂SiX‐O‐SiYtBu₂ (X = Y = OH, Br; X = OH, Y = H) and of the Adducts tBu₃SiOH·(HO₃SCF₃)_0.5·H₂O and tBu₃SiOLi·(LiO₃SCF₃)₂·(H₂O)₂ The disiloxanes tBu₂SiX‐O‐SiYtBu₂ (X = Y = H, OH) are accessible from the reaction of CF₃SO₂Cl with tBu₂SiHOH or tBu₂Si(OH)₂. By this reaction the disiloxane tBu₂SiH‐O‐SiHtBu₂ is formed together with tBu₂SiH‐O‐SiOHtBu₂. The disiloxanes tBu₂SiX‐O‐SiYtBu₂ (X = Y = Cl, Br) can be synthesized almost quantitatively from tBu₂SiH‐O‐SiHtBu₂ with Cl₂ and Br₂ in CH₂Cl₂. The structures of the disiloxanes tBu₂SiX‐O‐SiYtBu₂ (X = H, Y = OH; X = Y = OH, Br) show almost linear Si‐O‐Si units with short Si‐O bonds. Single crystals of the adducts tBu₃SiOH·(HO₃SCF₃)_0.5·H₂O and tBu₃SiOLi·(LiO₃SCF₃)₂·(H₂O)₂ have been obtained from the reaction of tBu₃SiOH with CF₃SO₃H and of tBu₃SiO₃SCF₃ with LiOH. According to the result of the X‐ray structural analysis (hexagonal, P‐62c), tBu₃SiOLi · (LiO₃SCF₃)₂·(H₂O)₂ features the ion pair [(tBu₃SiOLi)₂(LiO₃SCF₃)₃(H₂O)₃Li]⁺ [CF₃SO₃]^?. The central framework of the cation forms a trigonal Li₆ prism.     

Metal Derivatives of Heterocyclic Thioamides: Synthesis and Crystal Structures of Copper Complexes with 1‐Methyl‐1,3‐imidazoline‐2‐thione and 1,3‐Imidazoline‐2‐thione

Reactions of copper(I) halides (Cl, Br, I) with 1‐methyl‐1, 3‐imidazoline‐2‐thione (mimzSH) in 1 : 2 molar ratio yielded sulfur‐bridged dinuclear [Cu₂X₂(μ‐S‐mimzSH)₂(η¹‐S‐mimzSH)₂] (X = I, 1 , Br, 2 ; Cl, 3 ) complexes. Copper(I) iodide with 1,3‐imidazoline‐2‐thione (imzSH₂) and Ph₃P in 1 : 1 : 1 molar ratio has also formed a sulfur‐bridged dinuclear [Cu₂I₂(μ‐S‐imzSH₂)₂(PPh₃)₂] ( 4 ) complex. The central Cu(μ‐S)₂Cu cores form parallelograms with unequal Cu–S bond distances {2.324(2), 2.454(3) Å} ( 1 ); {2.3118(6), 2.5098(6) Å} ( 2 ); {2.3075(4), 2.5218(4) Å} ( 3 ); {2.3711(8), 2.4473(8) Å} ( 4 ). The Cu···Cu separations, 2.759–2.877Å in complexes 1 – 3 are much shorter than 3.3446Å in complex 4 . The weak intermolecular interactions {H₂CH···S^# ( 2 ); CH···Cl^# ( 3 ); NH···I^# ( 4 )} between dimeric units in complexes 2 – 4 lead to the formation of linear 1D polymers.     

Darstellung,Kristallstrukturen, Schwingungsspektren und Normalkoordinatenanalysen der Tetrahalogeno‐bis‐Pyridin‐Osmium(III)‐Komplexe cis‐(n‐Bu4N)[OsCl4Py2] und trans‐(n‐Bu4N)[OsX4Py2], X = Cl,Br

Synthesis, Crystal Structures, Vibrational Spectra, and Normal Coordinate Analyses of the Tetrahalogeno‐bis‐Pyridine‐Osmium(III) Complexes cis ‐( n ‐Bu₄N)[OsCl₄Py₂] and trans ‐( n ‐Bu₄N)[OsX₄Py₂], X = Cl, Br By reaction of (n‐Bu₄N)₂[OsX₆], X = Cl, Br, with pyridine and (n‐Bu₄N)[BH₄] tetrahalogeno‐bis‐pyridine‐osmium(III) complexes are formed and purified by chromatography. X‐ray structure determinations on single crystals have been performed of cis‐(n‐Bu₄N)[OsCl₄Py₂] ( 1 ) (triclinic, space group P1, a = 9.4047(9), b = 10.8424(18), c = 17.007(2) Å, α = 71.833(2), β = 81.249(10), γ = 67.209(12)°, Z = 2), trans‐(n‐Bu₄N)[OsCl₄Py₂] ( 2 ) (orthorhombic, space group P2₁2₁2₁, a = 8.7709(12), b = 20.551(4), c = 17.174(4) Å, Z = 4) and trans‐(n‐Bu₄N)[OsBr₄Py₂] ( 3 ) (triclinic, space group P1, a = 9.132(3), b = 12.053(3), c = 15.398(2) Å, α = 95.551(18), β = 94.12(2), γ = 106.529(19)°, Z = 2). Based on the molecular parameters of the X‐ray structure determinations and assuming C₂ point symmetry for the anion of 1 and D_2h point symmetry for the anions of 2 and 3 the IR and Raman spectra are assigned by normal coordinate analysis. The valence force constants of 1 are in the Cl–Os–Cl axis f_d(OsCl) = 1.58, in the asymmetrically coordinated N′–Os–Cl ^· axes f_d(OsCl ^· ) = 1.45, f_d(OsN′) = 2.48, of 2 f_d(OsCl) = 1.62, f_d(OsN) = 2.42 and of 3 f_d(OsBr) = 1.39 and f_d(OsN) = 2.34 mdyn/Å.     

Alkali‐Metal Pyrazolate Complexes with Unusual Pyrazolate Coordination Modes and Pseudocubane Motifs

The dimeric complex [Li(Ph₂pz)(OEt₂)]₂ ( 1 ) and tetrameric cluster [Na(Ph₂pz)(thf)]₄ ( 2 ) were prepared by treatment of alkali‐metal reagents (nBuLi and Na{N(SiMe₃)₂}, respectively) with 3,5‐diphenylpyrazole (Ph₂pzH) in Et₂O ( 1 ) or THF ( 2 ). The polymer [Na(tBu₂pz)]_n ( 3 ) was obtained from reaction at elevated temperature in a sealed tube between Na metal and 3,5‐di‐tert‐butylpyrazole (tBu₂pzH). The complex [Na₄(tBu₂pz)₂(thf)₃(obds)]₂ ( 4 ; obds=(OSiMe₂)₂O) was obtained as a minor product from prolonged treatment of tBu₂pzH with elemental sodium in a silicone‐greased flask. All four alkali‐metal pyrazolato complexes were characterized by IR and ¹H NMR spectroscopy and X‐ray crystallography.The Li dimer 1 displays μ‐η²:η¹ lithium–pyrazolato binding, in which both lithium atoms are four‐coordinate. Room‐ and variable‐temperature NMR studies (¹H, ¹³C, and ⁷Li) of 1 suggest similar behavior in solution, with peaks coalescing at low temperatures. Complexes 2 and 4 display distorted cubane structures. In 2 , all the sodium atoms are five‐coordinate, whereas 4 contains two sodium/pyrazolate/thf clusters (4:2:3 ratio) bridged by two obds^2? units, as well as two four‐coordinate and two five‐coordinate sodium atoms. Compound 3 is composed of two independent chains with the unusual coordination modes μ₃‐η⁵:η²:η², μ₃‐η⁵:η²:η¹, and μ₃‐η⁴:η²:η¹, with five‐, six‐, and seven‐coordinate sodium atoms. Two oxo‐centered M₈ cage complexes [(tBu₂pz)₆Li₈O] ( 5 ) and [(tBu₂pz)₆Na₈O] ( 6 ) were obtained as by‐products from attempted preparation of [Li(tBu₂pz)] and [Na(tBu₂pz)], respectively, and their structures were determined.     

Lanthanide(II) Complexes of the Dihydrotriazinido Ligand [N{C(Ph)=N}2C(tBu)Ph]−

The potassium dihydrotriazinide K(L^Ph,tBu) ( 1 ) was obtained by a metal exchange route from [Li(L^Ph,tBu)(THF)₃] and KOtBu (L^Ph,tBu = [N{C(Ph)=N}₂C(tBu)Ph]). Reaction of 1 with 1 or 0.5 equivalents of SmI₂(thf)₂ yielded the monosubstituted Sm^II complex [Sm(L^Ph,tBu)I(THF)₄] ( 2 ) or the disubstituted [Sm(L^Ph,tBu)₂(THF)₂] ( 3 ), respectively. Attempted synthesis of a heteroleptic Sm^II amido‐alkyl complex by the reaction of 2 with KCH₂Ph produced compound 3 due to ligand redistribution. The Yb^II bis(dihydrotriazinide) [Yb(L^Ph,tBu)₂(THF)₂] ( 4 ) was isolated from the 1:1 reaction of YbI₂(THF)₂ and 1 . Molecular structures of the crystalline compounds 2 , 3· 2C₆H₆ and 4· PhMe were determined by X‐ray crystallography.     

Synthesis of ferrocene‐containing N‐aryloxo β‐ketoiminate lanthanide complexes and polymerization of ε‐caprolactone

The synthesis, characterization and ε‐caprolactone polymerization behavior of lanthanide amido complexes stabilized by ferrocene‐containing N‐aryloxo functionalized β‐ketoiminate ligand FcCOCH₂C(Me)N(2‐HO‐5‐Bu^t‐C₆H₃) (LH₂, Fc = ferrocenyl) are described. The lanthanide amido complexes [LLnN(SiMe₃)₂(THF)]₂ [Ln = Nd ( 1 ), Sm ( 2 ), Yb ( 3 ), Y ( 4 )] were synthesized in good yields by the amine elimination reactions of LH₂ with Ln[N(SiMe₃)₂]₃(µ‐Cl)Li(THF)₃ in a 1:1 molar ratio in THF. These complexes were characterized by IR spectroscopy and elemental analysis, and ¹H NMR spectroscopy was added for the analysis of complex 4 . The definitive molecular structures of complexes 1 and 3 were determined by X‐ray diffraction studies. Complexes 1 – 4 can initiate the ring‐opening polymerization of ε‐caprolactone with moderate activity. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Synthesen und Reaktionen von Aluminiumalkoxid‐Verbindungen

Syntheses and Reactions of Aluminium Alkoxide Compounds Al(O^cHex)₃ ( 1 ) can be synthesized by the reaction of Al with cyclohexanol under evolving of H₂ in boiling xylene. [Li{Al(OCH₂Ph)₄}] ( 2 ) was obtained by treatment of PhCH₂OH with a 1 M solution of LiAlH₄ in THF. [{(THF)Li}₂{Al(O^tBu)₄}Cl] ( 3 ) is the result of the reaction of four equivalents of LiO^tBu on AlCl₃ in THF. 3 is the educt for the reactions with the Lewis‐acids InCl₃ and FeCl₃ in THF leading to the metalates [{(THF)₂Li}₂{Al(O^tBu)₄}] · [MCl₄] [M = In ( 4 ), Fe ( 5 )]. The attempt to react InCl₃ with four equivalents of LiO^tBu leads to only one isolated and characterized product, the complex [Li₄(O^tBu)₃(THF)₃Cl]₂ · THF ( 6 · THF), which can also be synthesized by the treatment of LiCl with three equivalents of LiO^tBu in THF. 1–6 · THF were characterized by NMR, IR and MS techniques as well as by X‐ray structure determinations. According to them, 1 , which is tetrameric in solution, is the first structurally characterized example of the proposed trimer form of aluminium alkoxides [ROAl{Al(OR)₄}₂] with a central trigonal bipyramidal coordinated Al atom. 2 forms a coordination polymer with a distorted tetrahedral coordination sphere of Li and Al, running along [100]. The trinuclear structure skeleton [{(THF)₂Li}₂{Al(O^tBu)₄}]⁺ is still present in the isotypical metalates 4 and 5 . The counter ions [MCl₄]^– possess nearly T_d symmetry. The remarkable structural motif of 6 · THF are two heterocubanes [Li₄(O^tBu)₃(THF)₃Cl] dimerized by Li–Cl bonds.     

Polypropylene and poly(ethylene‐co‐1‐octene) effective synthesis with diamine‐bis(phenolate) complexes: Effect of complex structure on catalyst activity and product microstructure

A series of group 4 metal complexes bearing amine‐bis(phenolate) ligands with the amino side‐arm donor: (μ‐O)[Me₂N(CH₂)₂N(CH₂‐2‐O‐3,5‐tBu₂‐C₆H₂)₂ZrCl]₂ ( 1a ), R₂N(CH₂)₂N(CH₂‐2‐O‐3‐R¹‐5‐R²‐C₆H₂)₂TiCl₂ (R = Me, R¹, R² = tBu ( 2a ), R = iPr, R¹, R² = tBu ( 2b ), R = iPr, R¹ = tBu, R² = OMe ( 2c )), and Me₂N(CH₂)₂N(CH₂‐2‐O‐3,5‐tBu₂‐C₆H₂)(CH₂‐2‐O‐C₆H₄)TiCl₂ ( 2d ) are used in ethylene and propylene homopolymerization, and ethylene/1‐octene copolymerization. All complexes, upon their activation with Al(iBu)₃/Ph₃CB(C₆F₅)₄, exhibit reasonable catalytic activity for ethylene homo‐ and copolymerization giving linear polyethylene with high to ultra‐high molecular weight (600·× 10³–3600·× 10³ g/mol). The activity of 1a /Al(iBu)₃/Ph₃CB(C₆F₅)₄ shows a positive comonomer effect, leading to over 400% increase of the polymer yield, while the addition of 1‐octene causes a slight reduction of the activity of the complexes 2a‐2d . The complexes with the NMe₂ donor group ( 2a , 2d , 1a ) display a high ability to incorporate a comonomer (up to 9–22 mol%), and the use of a bulkier donor group, N(iPr)₂ ( 2b , 2c ), results in a lower 1‐octene incorporation. All the produced copolymers reveal a broad chemical composition distribution. In addition, the investigated complexes polymerized propylene with the moderate ( 1a , 2a ) to low ( 2b‐2d ) activity, giving polymers with different microstructures, from purely atactic to isotactically enriched (mmmm = 28%). © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Polym. Sci., Part A: Polym. Chem. 2017 , 55, 2467–2476     

Chirale Gallium‐ und Indium‐Alkoxometallate

Chiral Gallium and Indium Alkoxometalates Li₂(S)‐BINOLate ((S)‐BINOL = (S)‐(–)‐2,2′‐Dihydroxy‐1,1′‐binaphthyl) generated by dilithiation of (S)BINOL with two equivalents ⁿBuLi was reacted with GaCl₃ und InCl₃ in THF to the alkoxometalates [{Li(THF)₂}{Li(THF)}₂{Ga((S)‐BINOLate)₃}] ( 1 ) and [{Li(THF)₂}₂{Li(THF)}{In((S)‐BINOLate)₃}] · [{Li(THF)₂}{Li(THF)}₂{In((S)‐ BINOLate)₃}]₂ ( 3 ), respectively. 1 and 3 crystallize from THF/toluene mixtures as 1 · 2 toluene and 3 · 8 toluene. The treatment of PhCH₂GaCl₂ with Li₂(S)‐BINOLate in THF under reflux, followed by recrystallization of the product from DME gives the gallate [{Li(DME)}₃{Ga((S)BINOLate)₃}] · 1.5 THF ( 2 · 1.5 THF). 1 – 3 were characterized by NMR, IR and MS techniques. In addition, 1 · 2 toluene, 2 · 1.5 THF and 3 · 8 toluene were investigated by X‐ray structure analyses. According to them, a distorted octahedral coordination sphere around the group 13 metal was formed, built‐up by three BINOLate ligands. The three Li⁺ counter ions act as bridging units by metal‐oxygen coordination. The coordination sphere of the Li⁺ ions was completed, depending on the available space, by one or two THF ligands ( 1 · 2 toluene, 3 · 8 toluene) and one DME ligand ( 2 · 1.5 THF), respectively. The sterical dominance of the BINOLate ligands can be shown by the almost square‐planar coordination of the Li⁺ ions in 2 · 1.5 THF giving a small twisting angle of only 17°.     

Synthesis,Structures and DFT Studies of Imido‐bridged and (Bis)ligand‐coordinated Titanium Complexes

Syntheses and structures of five imido‐bridged dinuclear titanium complexes and two (bis)ligand‐coordinated mononuclear titanium complexes are reported. Addition of 1 or 2 equiv. of Schiff base ligand (((1H‐pyrrol‐2‐yl)methylene)amino)‐2,3‐dihydro‐1H‐inden‐2‐ol (H₂L) to Ti(NMe₂)₄ resulted in transamination with 4 equiv. of dimethylamides generating a (bis)ligand‐coordinated complex Ti(L)₂ ( 1 ). Treatment of Ti(NMe₂)₄ with 1 equiv. of ^tBuNH₂ followed by addition of 1 equiv. of H₂L afforded an imido‐bridged complex [Ti(L)(N^tBu)]₂ ( 2 ). 1:1:1:1 reaction of Ti(NMe₂)₄/RNH₂/H₂L/py(or phen) produced imido‐bridgedcomplexes [Ti(L)(NPh)(py)]₂ ( 3 ), [Ti(L)(4‐F‐PhN)(py)]₂·Tol ( 4 ·Tol), [Ti(L)(4‐Cl‐PhN)(py)]₂·Tol·THF ( 5 ·Tol·THF), [Ti(L)(4‐Br‐PhN)(py)]₂·Tol ( 6 ·Tol) and a (bis)ligand‐coordinated complex Ti(L)₂·phen ( 7 ) (py = pyridine, phen = 1,10‐phenanthroline). Attempts to prepare the monomeric titianium imido complexes were unsuccessful. DFT studies show that the assumed compound which contains Ti = N species is less stable than imido‐bridged Ti‐N(R)‐Ti complexes, providing the better understanding of the experimental results.     

Isolation and Characterization,Including by X‐ray Crystallography,of Contact and Solvent‐Separated Ion Pairs of Silenyl Lithium Species

Reaction of bromoacylsilane 1 (pink solution) with tBu₂MeSiLi (3.5 equiv) in a 4:1 hexane:THF solvent mixture at ?78 °C to room temperature yields the solvent separated ion pair (SSIP) of silenyl lithium E‐[(tBuMe₂Si)(tBu₂MeSi)C=Si(SiMetBu₂)]^? [Li?4THF]⁺ 2 a (green–blue solution). Removal of the solvent and addition of benzene converts 2 a into the corresponding contact ion pair (CIP) 2 b (violet–red solution) with two THF molecules bonded to the lithium atom. The 2 a ? 2 b interconversion is reversible upon THF? benzene solvent change. Both 2 a and 2 b were characterized by X‐ray crystallography, NMR and UV/Vis spectroscopy, and theoretical calculations. The degree of dissociation of the Si?Li bond has a large effect on the visible spectrum (and thus color) and on the silenylic ²⁹Si NMR chemical shift, but a small effect on the molecular structure. This is the first report of the X‐ray molecular structure of both the SSIP and the CIP of any R₂E=E′RM species (E=C, Si; E′=C, Si; M=metal).     

Crystallographic report: Crystal structure of bis(2,4,6‐tri‐tert‐butylphenolato‐O) bis(tetrahydrofuran‐O) samarium (N,N‐η2‐azobenzene) diethyl ether solvate

Reaction of divalent Sm(OAr)₂(THF)₃ (Ar = C₆H₂‐tert‐Bu₃‐2,4,6; THF = tetrahydrofuran) with one equivalent of azobenzene in THF and crystallization of the product in diethyl ether afforded the title complex (ArO)₂(THF)₂Sm(η²‐N₂Ph₂)·Et₂O in good yield. In the complex, the N? N bond length for the azobenzene species is lengthened. The two Sm? N bonds are equivalent, and their bond lengths are intermediate between the donor bond and the single bond. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Isolation and Characterization,Including by X‐ray Crystallography,of Contact and Solvent‐Separated Ion Pairs of Silenyl Lithium Species

Reaction of bromoacylsilane 1 (pink solution) with tBu₂MeSiLi (3.5 equiv) in a 4:1 hexane:THF solvent mixture at −78 °C to room temperature yields the solvent separated ion pair (SSIP) of silenyl lithium E‐[(tBuMe₂Si)(tBu₂MeSi)C=Si(SiMetBu₂)]⁻ [Li⋅4THF]⁺ 2 a (green–blue solution). Removal of the solvent and addition of benzene converts 2 a into the corresponding contact ion pair (CIP) 2 b (violet–red solution) with two THF molecules bonded to the lithium atom. The 2 a ⇌ 2 b interconversion is reversible upon THF⇌ benzene solvent change. Both 2 a and 2 b were characterized by X‐ray crystallography, NMR and UV/Vis spectroscopy, and theoretical calculations. The degree of dissociation of the Si−Li bond has a large effect on the visible spectrum (and thus color) and on the silenylic ²⁹Si NMR chemical shift, but a small effect on the molecular structure. This is the first report of the X‐ray molecular structure of both the SSIP and the CIP of any R₂E=E′RM species (E=C, Si; E′=C, Si; M=metal).     

Self‐Assembly,Spectroscopic and Electrochemical Studies of Nickel(II)‐4,8‐Diazaundecanediamide Complex

The self‐assembly of NiCl₂·6H₂O with a diaminodiamide ligand 4,8‐diazaundecanediamide (L‐2,3,2) gave a [Ni(C₉H₂₀N₄O₂)(Cl)(H₂O)] Cl·2H₂O ( 1 ). The structure of 1 was characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis. Structural data for 1 indicate that the Ni(II) is coordinated to two tertiary N atoms, two O atoms, one water and one chloride in a distorted octahedral geometry. Crystal data for 1: orthorhombic, space group P 21nb, a = 9.5796(3) Å, b = 12.3463(4) Å, c = 14.6305(5) Å, Z = 4. Through NH···Cl–Ni (H···Cl 2.42 Å, N···Cl 3.24 Å, NH···Cl 158°) and OH···Cl–Ni contacts (H···Cl 2.36 Å, O···Cl 3.08 Å, OH···Cl 143°), each cationic moiety [Ni(C₉H₂₀N₄O₂) (Cl)(H₂O)]⁺ in 1 is linked to neighboring ones, producing a charged hydrogen‐bonded 1D chainlike structure. Thermogrametric analysis of compound 1 is consistent with the crystallographic observations. The electronic absorption spectrum of Ni(L‐2,3,2)²⁺ in aqueous solution shows four absorption bands, which are assigned to the ³A_2g → ³T_2g, ³T_2g → ¹Eg, ³T_2g → ³T_1g, and ³A_2g → ³T_1g transitions of triplet‐ground state, distorted octahedral nickel(II) complex. The cyclic volammetric measurement shows that Ni²⁺ is more easily reduced than Ni(L‐2,3,2)²⁺ in aqueous solution.     

Komplexchemie P-reicher Phosphane und Silylphosphane. XI [1]. Bildung,Reaktionen und Strukturen von Chromcarbonylkomplexen aus Reaktionen von Li(THF)2[η2-(tBu2P)2P] mit Cr(CO)5 · THF und Cr(CO)4 · NBD

Transition Metal Complexes of P-rich Phosphanes and Silylphosphanes. XI. Formation, Reactions, and Structures of Chromium Carbonyl Complexes from Reactions of Li(THF)₂[η₂-(^tBu₂P)₂P] with Cr(CO)₅ · THF and Cr(CO)₄ · NBD Reactions of Li(THF)₂[η²-(^tBu₂P)₂P] 1 with Cr(CO)₅ · THF yield Li(THF)₂Et₂O[Cr(CO)₄{η²-(^tBu₂P)₂P}η¹-Cr(CO)₅] 2 and the compounds [Cr(CO)₄{η²-(^tBu₂P)₂PH}] 3 , [Cr(CO)₅{η¹-(^tBu₂P)₂PH}] 4 , (^tBu₂P)₂PH 5 and ^tBu₂PH · Cr(CO)₅ 6 . The formation of 3, 4, 5 and 6 is due to byproducts coming from the synthesis of 1. 2 reacts with CH₃COOH under formation of 3 . After addition of 12-crown-4 1 with NBD · Cr(CO)₄ in THF forms Li(12-crown-4)₂[Cr(CO)₄-{η²-(^tBu₂P)₂P}] 7 (yellow crystals). 7 reacts with CH₃COOH to 3 – which regenerates 7 with LiBu – with Cr(CO)₅THF to compound 2 , with NBD · Cr(CO)₄ in THF to 2 and 3 (ratio 1 : 1). With EtBr, 7 forms [Cr(CO)₄{η²-(^tBu₂P)₂PEt}] 8 , and [Cr(CO)₄{η²-(^tBu₂P)₂PBr}] 9 with BrCH₂? CH₂Br. The compounds were characterized by means of ¹H, ¹³C, ³¹P, ⁷Li NMR spectroscopy, IR spectroscopy, elementary analysis, mass spectra, and 2, 3 and 4 additionally by means of X-ray diffraction analysis. 2 crystallizes in the space group P1 with 2 formula units in the elementary cell; a = 10.137(9), b = 15.295(12), c = 15.897(14) Å; α = 101.82(7), β = 91.65(7), γ = 98.99(7)°; 3 crystallizes in the space group P2_t/n with 4 molecules in the elementary unit; a = 11.914(6), b = 15.217(10), c = 14.534(10) Å; α = 90, β = 103.56(5), γ = 90°. 4 : space group P1 with 2 molecules in the elementary unit; a = 8.844(4), b = 12.291(6), c = 14.411(7) Å, α = 66.55(2), β = 89.27(2), γ = 71.44(2)°.     

Reaktionen von tBuPLi2 mit Carbodiimiden

Reaction of ^tBuPLi₂ with Carbodiimides The reaction of bis(cyclohexyl)carbodiimide with ^tBuPLi₂ in THF at 20 °C leads to the tetranuclear Li‐complex [Li₄(THF)₂{^tBuP([^cHexN]₂C)₂}₂] ( 1 ). No addition on the carbodiimide but a silyl transfer was observed under similar conditions during the treatment of bis(trimethylsilyl)carbodiimide with ^tBuPLi₂ to give the lithium salts ^tBuP(SiMe₃)Li and [Li(THF)(Me₃SiN‐C≡N)]_n ( 2 ). 1 was characterized by NMR, IR and RE spectroscopy, mass spectrometry and X‐ray analyses. Theoretical calculations were performed for 1 . According to the structural investigations 1 consists ofa central centrosymmetrical twelve‐membered Li₂N₄C₄P₂ ring adjacent by two six‐membered LiN₂C₂P rings. The peripheric Li⁺ cations posssess coordination number (cn) 3 buildt‐up by two N atoms and a THF ligand, while the two central Li⁺ cations possess only cn 2. However, the theoretical calculations have shown no relevant bonding Li···Li or Li···P interaction.