Are beliefs believable? An investigation of college students’ epistemological beliefs and behavior in mathematics

College students’ epistemological belief in their academic performance of mathematics has been documented and is receiving increased attention. However, to what extent and in what ways problem solvers’ beliefs about the nature of mathematical knowledge and thinking impact their performances and behavior is not clear and deserves further investigation. The present study investigated how Taiwanese college students espousing unlike epistemological beliefs in mathematics performed differently within different contexts, and in what contexts these college students’ epistemological beliefs were consistent with their performances and behavior. Results yielded from the survey of students’ performances on standardized tests, semi-open problems, and their behaviors on pattern-finding tasks, suggest mixed consequences. It appears that beliefs played a more reliable role within the well-structured context but lost its credibility in non-standardized tasks.     

The mathematical beliefs and behavior of high school students: Insights from a longitudinal study

There is a documented need for more research on the mathematical beliefs of students below college. In particular, there is a need for more studies on how the mathematical beliefs of these students impact their mathematical behavior in challenging mathematical tasks. This study examines the beliefs on mathematical learning of five high school students and the students’ mathematical behavior in a challenging probability task. The students were participants in an after-school, classroom-based, longitudinal study on students’ development of mathematical ideas funded by the United States National Science Foundation. The results show that particular educational experiences can alter results from previous studies on the mathematical beliefs and behavior of students below college, some of which have been used to justify non-reform pedagogical approaches in mathematics classrooms. Implications for classroom practice and ideas for future research are discussed.     

Students’ reflections on their learning experiences: lessons from a longitudinal study on the development of mathematical ideas and reasoning

This paper characterizes the views on mathematical learning of five high school students based on the students’ reflections on their mathematical experiences in a longitudinal study that focused on the development of mathematical ideas and reasoning in particular research conditions. The students’ views are presented according to five themes about learning which describe the students’ views on the nature of knowledge and what it means to know, source of knowledge, motivation to engage in learning, certainty in knowing, and how the students’ views vary with particular areas of mathematical activity. The study addresses the need for more research on epistemological beliefs of students below college age. In particular, the results provide evidence that challenge the existing assumption that, prior to college, students exhibit naïve epistemological beliefs.     

Promoting productive mathematical classroom discourse with diverse students

Productive mathematical classroom discourse allows students to concentrate on sense making and reasoning; it allows teachers to reflect on students’ understanding and to stimulate mathematical thinking. The focus of the paper is to describe, through classroom vignettes of two teachers, the importance of including all students in classroom discourse and its influence on students’ mathematical thinking. Each classroom vignette illustrates one of four themes that emerged from the classroom discourse: (a) valuing students’ ideas, (b) exploring students’ answers, (c) incorporating students’ background knowledge, and (d) encouraging student-to-student communication. Recommendations for further research on classroom discourse in diverse settings are offered.     

Teachers’ mathematical activity in inquiry-oriented instruction

This work investigates the relationship between teachers’ mathematical activity and the mathematical activity of their students. By analyzing the classroom video data of mathematicians implementing an inquiry-oriented abstract algebra curriculum I was able to identify a variety of ways in which teachers engaged in mathematical activity in response to the mathematical activity of their students. Further, my analysis considered the interactions between teachers’ mathematical activity and the mathematical activity of their students. This analysis suggests that teachers’ mathematical activity can play a significant role in supporting students’ mathematical development, in that it has the potential to both support students’ mathematical activity and influence the mathematical discourse of the classroom community.     

Using interactive algebra software to support a discourse community

In this work we studied the impact of using NuCalc, an interactive computer algebra software, on the development of a discourse community in a college level mathematics class. Qualitative and quantitative data were collected over the course of 3 weeks of instruction. We examined the influence of the software on: group interactions; the mathematical investigations of learners; and the teacher’s interactions with students. Data points to four distinct ways in which the presence of NuCalc positively impacted the learning community we studied: (1) it served as a tool for extending students’ mathematical thinking, (2) it motivated students’ engagement in group discourse, (3) it became a tool for mediating discourse, (4) it became a catalyst for refining the culture of classroom, shifting the patterns of interactions between the teacher and learners.     

Privileges of First-Person Reference and of Third-Person Reference

It is a widely held view that persons have privileged knowledge about their own minds, although numerous different views on what this privilege exactly consists of exist. One possible way of interpreting it is to claim that persons can refer to their own mental states in a privileged way. I will argue that this view has to be extended. Our common-sense view about reference to mental states implies that besides privileges of first-person reference to one's own mental states, there also exist privileges of third-person reference to the mental states of others: Other persons can refer to all of the mental states of a person in a way that the person cannot. In a next step, I will explain that persons can take two perspectives towards their own mental states: a first-person perspective and a third-person perspective. I will conclude that the possibilities of first-person reference from a third-person perspective are limited.     

An Investigation of Relationships between Seventh-Grade Students' Beliefs and Their Participation during Mathematics Discussions in Two Classrooms

As mathematics teachers attempt to promote classroom discourse that emphasizes reasoning about mathematical concepts and supports students' development of mathematical autonomy, not all students will participate similarly. For the purposes of this research report, I examined how 15 seventh-grade students participated during whole-class discussions in two mathematics classrooms. Additionally, I interpreted the nature of students' participation in relation to their beliefs about participating in whole-class discussions, extending results reported previously (Jansen, 2006) about a wider range of students' beliefs and goals in discussion-oriented mathematics classrooms. Students who believed mathematics discussions were threatening avoided talking about mathematics conceptually across both classrooms, yet these students participated by talking about mathematics procedurally. In addition, students' beliefs about appropriate behavior during mathematics class appeared to constrain whether they critiqued solutions of their classmates in both classrooms. Results suggest that coordinating analyses of students' beliefs and participation, particularly focusing on students who participate outside of typical interaction patterns in a classroom, can provide insights for engaging more students in mathematics classroom discussions.     

An “inverse” relationship between mathematics identities and classroom practices among early career elementary teachers: The impact of accountability

This qualitative case study guided by portraiture examines the relationships between three early career elementary teachers’ beliefs about themselves in relation to mathematics (mathematics identities) and their classroom practices. Through autobiographical inquiry, reflective practice, classroom observations, interviews, and artifacts, findings show that all three second grade teachers appeared to have an “inverse” relationship between their mathematics identities and their classroom practices. In this relationship, as negative as they felt about themselves with regards to mathematics, they expended that much more effort to ensure that their students would have positive experiences with it and not be stigmatized by it as they had been. Accountability to schools, students, and parents, to increase student achievement appeared to play an important role in this relationship. Implications for preservice teacher education, inservice professional development, and research on beliefs and practices are discussed.     

Why do U.S. and Chinese students think differently in mathematical problem solving?: Impact of early algebra learning and teachers’ beliefs

This paper reports two studies that examined the impact of early algebra learning and teachers’ beliefs on U.S. and Chinese students’ thinking. The first study examined the extent to which U.S. and Chinese students’ selection of solution strategies and representations is related to their opportunity to learn algebra. The second study examined the impact of teachers’ beliefs on their students’ thinking through analyzing U.S. and Chinese teachers’ scoring of student responses. The results of the first study showed that, for the U.S. sample, students who have formally learned algebraic concepts are as likely to use visual representations as those who have not formally learned algebraic concepts in their problem solving. For the Chinese sample, students rarely used visual representations whether or not they had formally learned algebraic concepts. The findings of the second study clearly showed that U.S. and Chinese teachers view students’ responses involving concrete strategies and visual representations differently. Moreover, although both U.S. and Chinese teachers value responses involving more generalized strategies and symbolic representations equally high, Chinese teachers expect 6th graders to use the generalized strategies to solve problems while U.S. teachers do not. The research reported in this paper contributed to our understanding of the differences between U.S. and Chinese students’ mathematical thinking. This research also established the feasibility of using teachers’ scoring of student responses as an alternative and effective way of examining teachers’ beliefs.     

Traditional instruction in advanced mathematics courses: a case study of one professor’s lectures and proofs in an introductory real analysis course

It is widely accepted by mathematics educators and mathematicians that most proof-oriented university mathematics courses are taught in a “definition-theorem-proof” format. However, there are relatively few empirical studies on what takes place during this instruction, why this instruction is used, and how it affects students’ learning. In this paper, I investigate these issues by examining a case study of one professor using this type of instruction in an introductory real analysis course. I first describe the professor’s actions in the classroom and argue that these actions are the result of the professor’s beliefs about mathematics, students, and education, as well as his knowledge of the material being covered. I then illustrate how the professor’s teaching style influenced the way that his students attempted to learn the material. Finally, I discuss the implications that the reported data have on mathematics education research.     

The discursive footprint of learning across mathematical domains: The case of the tangent line

This paper employs the commognitive frame (Sfard, 2008) to investigate how experiences with tangents across mathematical domains leave their marks on students’ subsequent work with tangents. To this aim, I introduce the notion of the discursive footprint of tangents and its characteristics by reviewing how tangents are used across mathematical domains in school textbooks. Manifestations of this footprint were sought in 182 undergraduate mathematics students’ responses to a questionnaire about tangents by labelling their responses and by identifying patterns in the endorsed narratives. Manifestations include the identification of characteristics of sole (and combination of) discourses (geometry, algebra, calculus, mathematical analysis) in student responses. Five themes emerged from the analysis: apparent replication of word use in different narratives; geometry-local hybrid discourse; endorsement of conflicting narratives; enrichment of familiar narratives with new words; and, mathematical analysis as a subsuming discourse. Finally, I discuss the potency of the discursive footprint in research and teaching.     

Integrating algebra and proof in high school mathematics: An exploratory study

Frequently, in the US students’ work with proofs is largely concentrated to the domain of high school geometry, thus providing students with a distorted image of what proof entails, which is at odds with the central role that proof plays in mathematics. Despite the centrality of proof in mathematics, there is a lack of studies addressing how to integrate proof into other mathematical domains. In this paper, we discuss a teaching experiment designed to integrate algebra and proof in the high school curriculum. Algebraic proof was envisioned as the vehicle that would provide high school students the opportunity to learn not only about proof in a context other than geometry, but also about aspects of algebra. Results from the experiment indicate that students meaningfully learned about aspects of both algebra and proof in that they produced algebraic proofs involving multiple variables, based on conjectures they themselves generated.     

The role of operating premises and reasoning paths in upper elementary students’ problem solving

The validity of students’ reasoning is central to problem solving. However, equally important are the operating premises from which students’ reason about problems. These premises are based on students’ interpretations of the problem information. This paper describes various premises that 11- and 12-year-old students derived from the information in a particular problem, and the way in which these premises formed part of their reasoning during a lesson. The teacher’s identification of differences in students’ premises for reasoning in this problem shifted the emphasis in a class discussion from the reconciliation of the various problem solutions and a focus on a sole correct reasoning path, to the identification of the students’ premises and the appropriateness of their various reasoning paths. Problem information that can be interpreted ambiguously creates rich mathematical opportunities because students are required to articulate their assumptions, and, thereby identify the origin of their reasoning, and to evaluate the assumptions and reasoning of their peers.     

A changing trajectory of proof learning in the geometry inquiry classroom

The purpose of this study is to explore how students changes through learning to construct mathematical proofs in an inquiry-based middle school geometry class in Korea. Although proof has long been considered as one of the most important aspects of mathematics education, it is well-known that it is one of the most difficult areas of school mathematics for students. The geometry inquiry classroom (GIC) is an experimental class designed to teach geometry, especially focusing on teaching proof, based on students’ own inquiry. Based on a 2-year participant observation in the GIC, this study was conducted to address the following research question: how has students’ practice of mathematical proof been changed through their participation in the GIC? The in-depth analysis of the classroom discourse identified three stages through which the students’ practice of mathematical proof was transformed in the GIC: ‘emergent understanding of proof’, ‘proof learning as a goal-oriented activity’, ‘experiencing proof as the practice of mathematics’. The study found that as learning evolved through these stages, so the mathematics teacher’s role shifted from being an instructor to a mediator of communication. Most importantly, this research showed that the GIC has created a learning environment where students develop their competence in constructing meaningful mathematical proof and grow to be ‘a human who proves’, ultimately ‘a person who playfully engages with mathematics’.     

Teacher listening: The role of knowledge of content and students

In this research report we consider the kinds of knowledge needed by a mathematician as she implemented an inquiry-oriented abstract algebra curriculum. Specifically, we will explore instances in which the teacher was unable to make sense of students’ mathematical struggles in the moment. After describing each episode we will examine the instructor's efforts to listen to the students and the way that these efforts were supported or constrained by her mathematical knowledge for teaching. In particular, we will argue that in each case the instructor was ultimately constrained by her knowledge of how students were thinking about the mathematics.     

Preservice Secondary Mathematics Teachers' Conceptualizations of Equity: Access and Power as Seen Through Vignette Responses

Attention to equity in the mathematics education field has been growing in recent years. We have evidence that many novice secondary mathematics teachers do not feel prepared to teach in regards to diverse populations. We need to know more about how secondary preservice mathematics teachers (PSMTs) conceptualize equitable environments. This study investigates 30 secondary PSMTs' proposed responses to two hypothetical vignettes from mathematics department conversations regarding calculator usage and mathematical discourse, respectively, utilizing two of Gutiérrez's four dimensions of equity: Access and Power. Results suggest these PSMTs considered equity, equality, and creating a classroom that invites participation among other factors when thinking of an equitable approach with respect to calculator usage. When considering mathematical discourse, PSMTs cited the need to “model” proper use of mathematical language as well as to allow students to themselves verbalize it. Implications mathematics education and teacher education more broadly are to integrate equity and equality discussions in methods courses and to include strategies to facilitate productive discourse.     

Images of mathematicians: a new perspective on the shortage of women in mathematical careers

Though women earn nearly half of the mathematics baccalaureate degrees in the United States, they make up a much smaller percentage of those pursuing advanced degrees in mathematics and those entering mathematics-related careers. Through semi-structured interviews, this study took a qualitative look at the beliefs held by five undergraduate women mathematics students about themselves and about mathematicians. The findings of this study suggest that these women held stereotypical beliefs about mathematicians, describing them to be exceptionally intelligent, obsessed with mathematics, and socially inept. Furthermore, each of these women held the firm belief that they do not exhibit at least one of these traits, the first one being unattainable and the latter two being undesirable. The results of this study suggest that although many women are earning undergraduate degrees in mathematics, their beliefs about mathematicians may be preventing them from identifying as one and choosing to pursue mathematical careers.