Sharp nonlogarithmic Kneser theorems for fourth-order elliptic equations

Let D(?) be the Doob's class containing all functions f(z) analytic in the unit disk Δ such that f(0) = 0 and lim $\text{inf}\text{¦f(z) ¦ ? 1}$ on an arc A of ?Δ with length $\text{¦A ¦? ?}$. It is first proved that if f?D(?) then the spherical norm ∥ f ∥ = sup_z?Δ$\text{(}\text{1 ? ¦z¦}{}^2\text{)¦f′(z)¦}\text{(1 + ¦f(z)¦}{}^2\text{) ? C}{}_1\text{sin}\text{(π ? (}\text{?}\text{2}\text{))/ (π ? (}\text{g9}\text{2}\text{))}$, where C₁ = lim_n→∞$\text{∥ z}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{∥}\text{and}\text{1}\text{2}\text{< C}{}_1\text{<}\text{2}\text{e}$. Next, U represents the Seidel's class containing all non-constant functions f(z) bounded analytic in Δ such that $\text{¦tf(e}{}^{\mathrm{i0}}\text{)¦ = 1}$ almost everywhere. It is proved that inf_f?U∥f∥ = 0, and if f has either no singularities or only isolated singularities on ?Δ, then ∥f∥ ? C₁. Finally, it is proved that if f is a function normal in Δ, namely, the norm ∥f∥< ∞, then we have the sharp estimate ∥f^p∥ ? p∥f∥, for any positive integer p.     

On Lp-spectrum of elliptic operators

For elliptic operators $\text{A = ∑}{}_{\mathrm{¦\alpha ¦\; ?\; m}}\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{(x) D}{}^{\mathrm{\alpha }}$ on Rⁿ and certain of their singular perturbations $\text{B = ∑}{}_{\mathrm{¦\alpha ¦\; ?\; m}}\text{b}{}_{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{(x)D}{}^{\mathrm{\alpha }}$ relative compactness of B with respect to A is established. This result applies to the study of L^p-spectra of elliptic operators for different p.     

On Lp estimates for the wave equation

New and more elementary proofs are given of two results due to W. Littman: (1) Let $\text{n ? 2, p ?}\text{2n}\text{(n ? 1)}$. The estimate $\text{∫∫ (¦▽u¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{+ ¦u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{) dx dt ? C ∫∫ ¦□u¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{dx dt}$ cannot hold for all u?C₀^∞(Q), Q a cube in $\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{<mi\; mathvariant="italic"\; is="true">n</mi>}}\text{× R}$, some constant C. (2) Let n ? 2, p ≠ 2. The estimate $\text{∫ (¦▽(t)¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{+ ¦u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(t)¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{) dx ? C(t) ∫ (¦▽u(0)¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{+ ¦u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(0)¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{) dx}$ cannot hold for all C^∞ solutions of the wave equation □u = 0 in $\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{x R}$; all t ?$\text{R}$; some function C: $\text{R}$ → $\text{R}$.     

Weak-1 generators for a class of subalgebras of l1

Let α ? 0 and let $\text{D(}\text{α}\text{) = {f(z) = ∑}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{α}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{z}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{¦ ∑}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(n + 1)}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>\alpha </mtext>}}\text{¦ a}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{¦ < ∞}}$. Then D(α) is a subalgebra of l¹. We discuss the weak-1 generators of D(α). We use some of our techniques to prove that if ? is a weak-1 generator of H^∞ and ∥ ? ∥_∞ ? 1, then the composition operator C_? on the Dirichlet space has dense range.     

The resolvent of a singularly perturbed elliptic operator

Let A and B be uniformly elliptic operators of orders 2m and 2n, respectively, m > n. We consider the Dirichlet problems for the equations (?^{2(m ? n)}A + B + λ²ⁿI)u_? = f and (B + λ²ⁿI)u = f in a bounded domain Ω in R^k with a smooth boundary ?Ω. The estimate is derived. This result extends the results of [7, 9, 10, 12, 14, 15, 18]by giving estimates up to the boundary, improving the rate of convergence in ?, using lower norms, and considering operators of higher order with variable coefficients. An application to a parabolic boundary value problem is given.     

Lp estimates for the wave equation

Let u(x, t) be the solution of u_tt ? Δ_xu = 0 with initial conditions $\text{u(x, 0) = g(x)}\text{and}\text{u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(x, 0) = ?;(x)}$. Consider the linear operator $\text{T: ?; → u(x, t)}$. (Here g = 0.) We prove for t fixed the following result. Theorem 1: T is bounded in L^p if and only if . Theorem 2: If the coefficients are variables in C and constant outside of some compact set we get: (a) If n = 2k the result holds for $\text{¦ p}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{? 2}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{¦ < (n ? 1)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}$. (b) If n = 2k ? 1, the result is valid for $\text{¦ p}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{? 2}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{¦ ? (n ? 1)}$. This result are sharp in the sense that for p such that $\text{¦ p}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{? 2}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{¦ > (n ? 1)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}$ we prove the existence of $\text{?; ? L}{}^{\mathrm{P}}$ in such a way that $\text{T?; ? L}{}^{\mathrm{P}}$. Several applications are given, one of them is to the study of the Klein-Gordon equation, the other to the completion of the study of the family of multipliers $\text{m(ξ) = ψ(ξ) e}{}^{\mathrm{i¦\xi ¦}}\text{¦ ξ ¦}{}^{\mathrm{?b}}$ and finally we get that the convolution against the kernel $\text{K(x) = ?(x)(1 ? ¦ x ¦)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}$ is bounded in H¹.     

On an estimate for Bloch and Doob norm and covering problem in Doob's class

For any fixed 0 < π ? 2π, let D(π) be the family of all holomorphic functions in the unit disk Δ which satisfy (i)f(0) = 0 and (ii) $\text{lim inf}{}_{\mathrm{z\; \to \; \pi ¦f(z)¦\; ?\; 1}}$, for all π lying on some arc A_f ? ?Δ with arclength $\text{¦A}{}_{\mathrm{f}}\text{¦ ? π}$. We show that for each 0 < ε < 1, there is a π₀ > 0 such that for any f?D(π) with π < π₀, the Bloch and Doob norm respectively satisfy

$\text{6f6}{}_{\mathrm{B}}\text{=}\text{sup}\text{z?Δ}\text{|f′(z)| (1?|z|}{}^2\text{) > 2(1 ? ε)}\text{log}\text{1+}\text{cos}\text{(}\text{p}\text{2}\text{1?}\text{cos}\text{(}\text{p}\text{2}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}$

$\text{6f6}{}_{\mathrm{D}}\text{=}\text{sup}\text{z?Δ}\text{|f′(z)| (1?|z|) > (1 ? ε)}\text{log}\text{1}\text{1?}\text{cos}\text{(}\text{p}\text{2}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}$

These two estimates do not hold with ε = 0.     

Extensions of unbounded 1-derivations in UHF C1-algebras

We consider unbounded ¹-derivations δ in UHF-C¹-algebras A=(∪^∞_n=1A_n)^?) with dense domain. If ?_n:A→A_n denotes the conditional expectations onto the finite type I factors $\text{A}$_n, then we introduce a weak-commutativity condition for δ and the sequence (?_n). As a consequence of this condition on δ we establish the existence of an extension derivation δ′ which is the infinitesimal generator of a strongly continuous one-parameter group, α: $\text{R}$ → Aut($\text{A}$), of ¹-automorphisms, i.e., $\text{δ′(x) =}\text{(d}\text{dt)}\text{α}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(x)¦}{}_{\mathrm{t\; =\; 0}}$ for x?D(δ′). Special properties of α (alias δ′) are considered. We show that AF-algebras are associated to proper restrictions δ of derivations δ′ of product type. We then turn to the extendability problem for quasifree derivations in the CAR-algebra. There, extensions δ′ are calculated which generate strongly continuous semigroups of ¹-homomorphisms. These semigroups do not extend to one-parameter groups unless the implementing symmetric operator in one-particle space is already self-adjoint.     

On tensor products of certain group C1-algebras

If A and B are C¹-algebras there is, in general, a multiplicity of C¹-norms on their algebraic tensor product A ⊙ B, including maximal and minimal norms ν and α, respectively. A is said to be nuclear if α and ν coincide, for arbitrary B. The earliest example, due to Takesaki [11], of a nonnuclear C¹-algebra was $\text{C}{}_{\mathrm{l}}{}^1\text{(F}{}_2\text{)}$, the C¹-algebra generated by the left regular representation of the free group on two generators F₂. It is shown here that W¹-algebras, with the exception of certain finite type I's, are nonnuclear.If $\text{C}{}^1\text{(F}{}_2\text{)}$ is the group C¹-algebra of F₂, there is a canonical homomorphism λ_l of $\text{C}{}^1\text{(F}{}_2\text{)}$ onto $\text{C}{}_{\mathrm{l}}{}^1\text{(F}{}_2\text{)}$. The principal result of this paper is that there is a norm ζ on $\text{C}{}_{\mathrm{l}}{}^1\text{(F}{}_2\text{) ⊙ C}{}_{\mathrm{l}}{}^1\text{(F}{}_2\text{)}$, distinct from α, relative to which the homomorphism $\text{λ ⊙ λ}{}_{\mathrm{l}}\text{: C}{}^1\text{(F}{}_2\text{) ⊙ C}{}^1\text{(F}{}_2\text{) → C}{}_{\mathrm{l}}{}^1\text{(F}{}_2\text{) ⊙ C}{}_{\mathrm{l}}{}^1\text{(F}{}_2\text{)}$ is bounded ($\text{C}{}^1\text{(F}{}_2\text{) ⊙ C}{}^1\text{(F}{}_2\text{)}$ being endowed with the norm α). Thus quotients do not, in general, respect the norm α; a consequence of this is that the set of ideals of the α-tensor product of C¹-algebras A and B may properly contain the set of product ideals {$\text{I ? B + A ? J: I ? A, J ? B}$}.Let A and B be C¹-algebras. If A or B is a W¹-algebra there are on A ⊙ B certain C¹-norms, defined recently by Effros and Lance [3], the definitions of which take account of normality. In the final section of the paper it is shown by example that these norms, with α and ν, can be mutually distinct.     

Compositions of singular integral operators

The composition of two Calderón-Zygmund singular integral operators is given explicitly in terms of the kernels of the operators. For φ?L¹(Rⁿ) and ε = 0 or 1 and ∝ φ = 0 if ε = 0, let Ker(φ) be the unique function on R^{n + 1} homogeneous of degree ?n ? 1 of parity ε that equals φ on the hypersurface x₀ = 1. Let Sing(φ, ε) denote the singular integral operator , which exists under suitable growth conditions on ? and φ. Then Sing(φ, ε₁) Sing(ψ, ε₂)f = ?2π²(∝ φ)(∝ ψ)f + Sing(A, ε₁, + ε₂)f, where

(with notation $\text{¦t¦}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{a}}\text{= ¦t¦}{}^{\mathrm{a}}\text{and}\text{¦t¦}{}_1{}^{\mathrm{a}}\text{= ¦t¦}{}^{\mathrm{a}}\text{sgn}\text{t}$). This result is used to show that the mapping ψ → A is a classical pseudo-differential operator of order zero if φ is smooth, with top-order symbol

$\text{ω}{}_0\text{(x,?)=?πiθ(?)∫θ(x?y)}\text{sgn}\text{y·?dy}\text{if}\text{?}{}_1\text{=1}$

,

$\text{=?2θ(?)∫θ(x?y)}\text{log}\text{|y·?|dy}\text{if}\text{?}{}_1\text{=0}$

where θ(ξ) is a cut-off function. These results are generalized to singular integrals with mixed homogeneity.     

An Lp bound for the Riesz and Bessel potentials of orthonormal functions

Let ψ₁, …,ψ_N be orthonormal functions in $\text{R}$^d and let $\text{u}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{= (?Δ)}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>?</mtext><mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{ψ}{}_{\mathrm{i}}$, or $\text{u}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{= (?Δ + 1)}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>?</mtext><mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{ψ}{}_{\mathrm{i}}$, and let $\text{p(x) = ∑¦u}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(x)¦}{}^2$. L^p bounds are proved for p, an example being $\text{∥p∥}{}_{\mathrm{p}}\text{? A}{}_{\mathrm{d}}\text{N}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>p</mtext>}}\text{for}\text{d ? 3}$, with p = d(d ? 2)^?1. The unusual feature of these bounds is that the orthogonality of the ψ_i, yields a factor $\text{N}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>p</mtext>}}$ instead of N, as would be the case without orthogonality. These bounds prove some conjectures of Battle and Federbush (a Phase Cell Cluster Expansion for Euclidean Field Theories, I, 1982, preprint) and of Conlon (Comm. Math. Phys., in press).     

The spectra of composition operators on Hp

For H^p, 1 ? p < ∞, composition operators C_?, defined by $\text{C}{}_{\mathrm{?}}\text{(?) = ? ° ?}$ for $\text{? ? H}{}^{\mathrm{p}}$, ? analytic on $\text{D = {z ¦ ¦ z ¦ < 1}}$ are considered, and their spectra determined in the case where ? is analytic on an open region containing D?.     

On the continuity of the map ϑ → ¦ϑ¦ from the predual of a W1-algebra

Let ?, ψ be elements in the predual of a W¹-algebra. For their absolute value parts ¦?¦, ¦ψ¦, the estimate $\text{∥¦?¦ ? ¦ψ¦∥ ? (2 ∥? + ψ∥ ∥? ? ψ∥)}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}$ is obtained.     

Equations du type de Monge-Ampère sur les variétés Riemanniennes compactes,III

Let (V_n, g) be a C^∞ compact Riemannian manifold without boundary. Given the following changes of metric: $\text{g′}{}_{\mathrm{?}}{}^{\mathrm{\pm }}\text{= g +}\text{Hess}\text{? ±}\text{l}\text{α}{}^2\text{(▽ ? ? ▽?),}\text{g}\text{?}{}^{\mathrm{\pm }}\text{= ±?g + α}{}^2\text{Hess}\text{?}$, where a is a fixed constant, we study the corresponding Monge-Ampère equations (1)^±$\text{Log}\text{(¦g′}{}_{\mathrm{?}}{}^{\mathrm{\pm }}\text{¦ ¦g¦}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{) = F(P,▽?;?)}$, (2)^±$\text{Log}\text{(¦}\text{g}\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{?}}{}^{\mathrm{\pm }}\text{¦ ¦g¦}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{) = F(P, ▽?; ?)}$. We first solve Eq. (2)^?, under some simple assumptions on F?C^∞. Then, using an appropriate change of functions that enables us to take advantage of the estimates just carried out for Eq. (2)^?, we extend to Eq.(1)^? all the results proved in our previous articles [5, 6] for the usual Monge-Ampère equation. Although equation (2)⁺ is not locally invertible, and does not even admit a solution for all $\text{F = λ? + ?, λ > 0, f ? C}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(V}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{)}$, a similar change of functions leads to partial results about Eq. (1)⁺, via C² and C³ estimates for Eq. (2)⁺. Eventually we give some comments and errata of our previous article (P. Delanoë, J. Funct. Anal.41 (1981), 341–353).     

Integral inequalities for generalized concave or convex functions

Let ψ be convex with respect to ?, B a convex body in Rⁿ and f a positive concave function on B. A well-known result by Berwald states that $\text{1}\text{¦B¦}\text{∝}{}_{\mathrm{B}}\text{ψ(f(x)) dx ? n ∝}{}_0{}^1\text{ψ(ξt)(1 ? t)}{}^{\mathrm{n\; ?\; 1)}}\text{dt}$ (1) if ξ is chosen such that $\text{1}\text{¦B¦}\text{∝}{}_{\mathrm{B}}\text{?(f(x)) dx = n ∝}{}_0{}^1\text{?(ξt)(1 ? t)}{}^{\mathrm{n\; ?\; 1)}}\text{dt}$.The main purpose in this paper is to characterize those functions f : B → R₊ such that (1) holds.     

Positive definite distributions on K\GK

Let G be a semisimple noncompact Lie group with finite center and let K be a maximal compact subgroup. Then W. H. Barker has shown that if T is a positive definite distribution on G, then T extends to Harish-Chandra's Schwartz space $\text{C}$¹(G). We show that the corresponding property is no longer true for the space of double cosets $\text{K}\text{G}\text{K}$. If G is of real-rank 1, we construct liner functionals $\text{T}{}_{\mathrm{p}}\text{? (C}{}_{\mathrm{c}}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(K}\text{G}\text{K}\text{))′}$ for each p, 0 < p ? 2, such that $\text{T}{}_{\mathrm{p}}\text{(f 1 f}{}^1\text{) ? 0, ?f ? C}{}_{\mathrm{c}}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(K}\text{G}\text{K}\text{)}$ but T_p does not extend to a continuous functional on $\text{C}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{(K}\text{G}\text{K}\text{)}$. In particular, if p ? 1, T_v does not extend to a continuous functional on $\text{C}{}^1\text{(K}\text{G}\text{K}\text{)}$. We use this to answer a question (in the negative) raised by Barker whether for a K-bi-invariant distribution T on G to be positive definite it is enough to verify that $\text{T(f 1 f}{}^1\text{) ? 0, ?f ? C}{}_{\mathrm{c}}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(K}\text{G}\text{K}\text{)}$. The main tool used is a theorem of Trombi-Varadarajan.     

Radial bounds for perturbations of elliptic operators

Elliptic operators $\text{A = ∑}{}_{\mathrm{¦\alpha ¦\; ?\; m}}\text{b}{}_{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{(x) D}{}^{\mathrm{\alpha }}$, α a multi-index, with leading term positive and constant coefficient, and with lower order coefficients defined on $\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{<mi\; mathvariant="italic"\; is="true">n</mi>}}$ or a quotient space $\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{U}{}_{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{, U}{}_{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{? R}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$ are considered. It is shown that the L^p-spectrum of A is contained in a “parabolic region” Ω of the complex plane enclosing the positive real axis, uniformly in p. Outside Ω, the kernel of the resolvent of A is shown to be uniformly bounded by an L¹ radial convolution kernel. Some consequences are: A can be closed in all L^p (1 ? p ? ∞), and is essentially self-adjoint in L² if it is symmetric; A generates an analytic semigroup e^?tA in the right half plane, strongly L^p and pointwise continuous at t = 0. A priori estimates relating the leading term and remainder are obtained, and summability $\text{φ(εA)?→}{}_{\mathrm{\epsilon \; \to \; 0}}\text{φ(0) ?}$, with φ analytic, is proved for $\text{? ? L}{}^{\mathrm{p}}$, with convergence in L^p and on the Lebesgue set of ?. More comprehensive summability results are obtained when A has constant coefficients.     

Étude d'une équation de Monge-Ampère sur les variétés kählériennes compactes

On a compact Kähler manifold of complex dimension m ? 2, let us consider the change of Kähler metric $\text{g′}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>\lambda </mtext><mtext>\backslash </mtext><mtext>?</mtext><mtext>gm</mtext>}}\text{= g}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>\lambda </mtext><mtext>\backslash </mtext><mtext>?</mtext><mtext>gm</mtext>}}\text{+ ?}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>\lambda </mtext><mtext>\backslash </mtext><mtext>?</mtext><mtext>gm</mtext>}}\text{φ}$. Let F?C^∞(V × R) be a function everywhere > 0 and v a real number ≠ 0. When $\text{0 < C}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{? F(x, t) ? C(¦t¦}{}^{\mathrm{a}}\text{+ 1)}$ for all (x, t) ?V × ] ?∞, t₀], where C and t₀ are constants and $\text{1 ? a <}\text{m}\text{(m ? 1)}$, one exhibits a function φ?C^∞ (V) such that $\text{¦g′∥g¦}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{= e}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>\nu </mtext><mtext>\backslash </mtext><mtext>?</mtext><mtext>gf</mtext>}}\text{F(x, φ ?}\text{}\text{?}\text{gf) (¦g¦}\text{and}\text{¦g′¦}$ the determinants of the metrics g and $\text{g′,}\text{}\text{?}\text{gf = (}\text{mes}\text{V)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{∝ φ dV)}$.