Eliminating the chlorite interference in US Environmental Protection Agency Method 317.0 permits analysis of trace bromate levels in all drinking water matrices

A post-column reagent (PCR) method for bromate analysis in drinking water with a method detection limit (MDL) and method reporting limit (MRL) of 0.1 and 0.5 microg/l, respectively, has been developed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for future publication as EPA Method 317.0. The PCR method provides comparable results to the EPA's Selective Anion Concentration (SAC) method used to support the laboratory analysis of Information Collection Rule (ICR) low-level bromate samples and offers a simple, rugged, direct injection method with potential to be utilized as a compliance monitoring technique for all inorganic Disinfectants/Disinfection By-Products (D/DBPs). It has superior sensitivity for bromate compared to EPA Method 300.1, which was promulgated as the compliance monitoring method for bromate under Stage 1 of the D/DBP rule. This paper addresses elimination of the chlorite interference that was previously reported in finished waters from public water systems (PWSs) that employ chlorine dioxide as the disinfectant. An evaluation of Method 317.0 for the analysis of bromate in commercial bottled waters is also reported.     

Collaborative study of EPA Method 317.0 for the determination of inorganic oxyhalide disinfection by-products in drinking water using ion chromatography with the addition of a postcolumn reagent for trace bromate analysis

The development of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 317.0 is initiated to provide a sufficiently sensitive and fundamental technique for the compliance monitoring of trace levels of bromate in drinking water. After a comparative evaluation of Method 317.0 and elimination of a chlorite interference, this method is tested by a collaborative study in order to determine the precision and bias of the method and evaluate its potential role as a future compliance-monitoring method for inorganic disinfection by-products (DBPs) and trace bromate. This technique provides a practical method for future compliance monitoring for all of the inorganic oxyhalide DBPs including trace concentrations of bromate.     

US Environmental Protection Agency Method 326.0, a new method for monitoring inorganic oxyhalides and optimization of the postcolumn derivatization for the selective determination of trace levels of bromate

The development of US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 317.0 provided a more sensitive, acceptable alternative to EPA Method 300.1 to be proposed as one of the recommended compliance monitoring methods for Stage II of the Disinfectants/Disinfection By-Products (DBP) Rule. This work was initiated to evaluate other postcolumn reagents (PCRs) that might be utilized to provide an additional, alternative method in order to augment compliance monitoring flexibility for inorganic oxyhalide DBP anions. Modifications of the method reported by Salhi and von Gunten, which included adjustment and optimization of flow-rates, reaction temperature, and delivery of the PCR, improved the method performance. Method 326.0 incorporates an acidic solution of potassium iodide containing catalytic amounts of molybdenum(VI) as the PCR and provides acceptable precision and accuracy for all analytes and a postcolumn bromate detection limit in reagent water of 0.17 microg/l.     

Determination of trace concentrations of bromate in municipal and bottled drinking waters using a hydroxide-selective column with ion chromatography

The International Agency for Research on Cancer determined that bromate is a potential human carcinogen, even at low micro/l levels in drinking water. Bromate is commonly produced from the ozonation of source water containing naturally occurring bromide. Traditionally, trace concentrations of bromate and other oxyhalides in environmental waters have been determined by anion exchange chromatography with an IonPac AS9-HC column using a carbonate eluent and suppressed conductivity detection, as described in EPA Method 300.1 B. However, a hydroxide eluent has lower suppressed background conductivity and lower noise compared to a carbonate eluent and this can reduce the detection limit and practical quantitation limit for bromate. In this paper, we examine the effect of using an electrolytically generated hydroxide eluent combined with a novel hydroxide-selective anion exchange column for the determination of disinfection byproduct anions and bromide in municipal and bottled drinking water samples. EPA Methods 300.1 B and 317.0 were used as test criteria to evaluate the new anion exchange column. The combination of a hydroxide eluent with a high capacity hydroxide-selective column allowed sub-microg/l detection limits for chlorite, bromate, chlorate, and bromide with a practical quantitation limit of 1 microg/l bromate using suppressed conductivity detection and 0.5 microg/l using postcolumn addition of o-dianisidine followed by visible detection. The linearity, method detection limits, robustness, and accuracy of the methods for spiked municipal and bottled water samples will be discussed.     

Analysis of 500-ng/l levels of bromate in drinking water by direct-injection suppressed ion chromatography coupled with a single, pneumatically delivered post-column reagent

In July 1997, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) began sampling and analyzing drinking water matrices from US municipalities serving populations greater than 100 000 for low-level bromate (>0.20 μg/l) in support of the Information Collection Rule (ICR) using the selective anion concentration (SAC) method. In September 1997, EPA published Method 300.1 which lowered the Method 300.0 bromate method detection limit (MDL) from 20.0 to 1.4 μg/l. This paper describes the research conducted at the EPA’s Technical Support Center laboratory investigating a single post-column reagent, o-dianisidine (ODA), which has been successfully coupled to EPA Method 300.1 to extend the MDL for bromate. Initial studies indicate that this method offers a MDL which approaches the EPA’s SAC method with the added benefit of increased specificity, shortened analysis time and reduced sample preparation. The method provides excellent ruggedness and acceptable precision and accuracy with a bromate MDL in reagent water of 0.1 μg/l, and a method reporting limit of 0.50 μg/l.     

Comparison of three post-column reaction methods for the analysis of bromate and nitrite in drinking water

Three post-column ion chromatographic methods (i.e., a sodium bromide–sodium nitrite method, an o-dianisidine method, and a potassium iodide–ammonium heptamolybdate method) were compared for bromate and nitrite analysis. Also, the effect of direct mixing of the reagents without ion suppressors for the sodium bromide–sodium nitrite method and the potassium iodide–ammonium heptamolybdate method was investigated. For the analysis of bromate, the three methods showed similar method detection limits (0.17–0.24 μg/l) with pneumatic reagent delivery systems. Direct reagent mixing achieved comparable detection limits to the suppressor configuration. The three methods are also compatible with conductivity detection. When used in combination with conductivity detection, this compatibility allows simultaneous analysis of bromate, nitrite, and other common ions in drinking water, such as bromide. It was found that the o-dianisidine method achieves μg/l-level detection of nitrite and bromate with a simpler configuration than the potassium iodide–ammonium heptamolybdate method, while the sodium bromide–sodium nitrite method was not sufficiently sensitive for nitrite analysis at the μg/l level.     

Bromide/bromate speciation by NTI-IDMS and ICP-MS coupled with ion exchange chromatography

 Two different mass spectrometric methods, negative thermal ionization isotope dilution mass spectrometry (NTI-IDMS) and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), off-line and on-line coupled with anion exchange chromatography, have been developed for simultaneous bromide and bromate determinations in water samples. The detection limits of these methods are in the range of 0.03–0.09 μg/L using a 50 mL sample.The results are independent of the content of other anions, which could be demonstrated by the analyses of six mineral waters containing chloride and sulfate of up to 160 mg/L and 1500 mg/L, respectively. Bromide has been analyzed by the NTI-IDMS method in the range of 10–500 μg/L and bromate in the range of 1–50 μg/L with relative standard deviations of 0.3–1.2% and 0.4–6%. Quantification for the ICP-MS method was carried out by the standard addition technique, which resulted in relative standard deviations of 5.5% for bromide at the 500 μg/L level and of 13% for bromate at the level of about 3 μg/L. These results are compared with those described in the literature for ion chromatographic (IC) and other methods and those obtained in this work by IC using UV detection, which allows high concentrations of chloride in the bromate fraction. The detection limits of this IC method are 6 μg/L for bromide and 30 μg/L for bromate. NTI-IDMS and ICP-MS therefore fit the recommendations of the European Union (detection limit<2.5 μg/L; precision and accuracy better than 25% at the 10 μg/L level) for methods analyzing the carcinogenic bromate much better than IC and other methods applied up to now. As a definitive but time consuming method, NTI-IDMS is preferably applicable as a calibration technique, whereas ICP-MS, with relatively short analysis times, due to on-line coupling with chromatography, can be used as a sensitive and powerful routine method for trace bromide and bromate species in water samples. Received: 5 July 1996/Accepted: 7 August 1996     

Bromide/bromate speciation by NTI-IDMS and ICP-MS coupled with ion exchange chromatography

 Two different mass spectrometric methods, negative thermal ionization isotope dilution mass spectrometry (NTI-IDMS) and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), off-line and on-line coupled with anion exchange chromatography, have been developed for simultaneous bromide and bromate determinations in water samples. The detection limits of these methods are in the range of 0.03–0.09 μg/L using a 50 mL sample.The results are independent of the content of other anions, which could be demonstrated by the analyses of six mineral waters containing chloride and sulfate of up to 160 mg/L and 1500 mg/L, respectively. Bromide has been analyzed by the NTI-IDMS method in the range of 10–500 μg/L and bromate in the range of 1–50 μg/L with relative standard deviations of 0.3–1.2% and 0.4–6%. Quantification for the ICP-MS method was carried out by the standard addition technique, which resulted in relative standard deviations of 5.5% for bromide at the 500 μg/L level and of 13% for bromate at the level of about 3 μg/L. These results are compared with those described in the literature for ion chromatographic (IC) and other methods and those obtained in this work by IC using UV detection, which allows high concentrations of chloride in the bromate fraction. The detection limits of this IC method are 6 μg/L for bromide and 30 μg/L for bromate. NTI-IDMS and ICP-MS therefore fit the recommendations of the European Union (detection limit<2.5 μg/L; precision and accuracy better than 25% at the 10 μg/L level) for methods analyzing the carcinogenic bromate much better than IC and other methods applied up to now. As a definitive but time consuming method, NTI-IDMS is preferably applicable as a calibration technique, whereas ICP-MS, with relatively short analysis times, due to on-line coupling with chromatography, can be used as a sensitive and powerful routine method for trace bromide and bromate species in water samples. Received: 5 July 1996/Accepted: 7 August 1996     

Use of ion chromatography with post-column reaction for the measurement of tribromide to evaluate bromate levels in drinking water

A user-friendly ion chromatography method in conjunction with a post-column reaction (PCR) achieves practical quantitation limits for the oxyhalides bromate and chlorite of 0.05 μg/l and 0.10 μg/l, respectively. This level of measurement allows for the accurate assessment of bromate contributed to finished drinking waters that have been chlorinated using sodium hypochlorite. The target sensitivity of oxyhalides in the presence of other major ion species typically found in drinking water is achieved by PCR using excess bromide under acidic conditions to form a tribromide species that is detected by ultraviolet spectrometry. The method setup involves non-hazardous materials, as opposed to other recently developed methods that employ somewhat hazardous chemicals for generating the reaction necessary for the detection of bromate at sub-μg/l levels. No pretreatment of the samples is required, other than filtration and quenching of oxidant residual.     

Comparison of ion chromatographic methods based on conductivity detection, post-column-reaction and on-line-coupling IC-ICP-MS for the determination of bromate

An established method for the determination of the disinfection by-product bromate is ion chromatography (IC). This paper presents a comparison of three IC methods based on either conductivity detection (IC-CD), a post-column-reaction (IC-PCR-VIS) or the on-line-coupling with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (IC-ICP-MS). Main characteristics of the methods such as method detection limits (MDL), time of analysis and sample pretreatment are compared and applicability for routine analysis is critically discussed. The most sensitive and rugged method is IC-ICP-MS, followed by IC-PCR-VIS. The photometric detection is subject to a minor interference in real world samples, presumably caused by carbonate. The lowest sensitivity is shown by the IC-CD method as slowest method compared, which, in addition, requires a sample pretreatment. The highest amount of information is delivered by IC-PCR-VIS, which allows the simultaneous determination of the seven standard anions and bromate.     

Determination of bromate in drinking water by ultraperformance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

Bromate is a byproduct formed as a result of disinfection of bromide-containing source water with ozone or hypochlorite. The International Agency for Research on Cancer has recognized bromate as a possible human carcinogen, thus it is essential to determine in drinking water. Present work highlights a development of sensitive and fast analytical method for bromate determination in drinking water by using ultraperformance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The quality parameters of the developed method were established, obtaining very low limit of detection (0.01 ng/mL), repeatability and reproducibility have been found to be less than 3% in terms of relative standard deviation when analyzing a bromate standard at 0.05 μg/mL with 0.4 min analysis time. Developed method was applied for the analysis of metropolitan and bottled water from Saudi Arabia; 22 samples have been analyzed. Bromate was detected in the metropolitan water samples (from desalinization source) at concentrations ranging between 3.43 and 75.04 ng/mL and in the bottled water samples at concentrations ranging between 2.07 and 21.90 ng/mL. Moreover, in comparison to established analytical methods such as liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, the proposed method was found to be very sensitive, selective and rapid for the routine analysis of bromate at low level in drinking water.     

Comparison of ion chromatographic methods based on conductivity detection, post-column-reaction and on-line-coupling IC-ICP-MS for the determination of bromate

An established method for the determination of the disinfection by-product bromate is ion chromatography (IC). This paper presents a comparison of three IC methods based on either conductivity detection (IC-CD), a post-column-reaction (IC-PCR-VIS) or the on-line-coupling with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (IC-ICP-MS). Main characteristics of the methods such as method detection limits (MDL), time of analysis and sample pretreatment are compared and applicability for routine analysis is critically discussed. The most sensitive and rugged method is IC-ICP-MS, followed by IC-PCR-VIS. The photometric detection is subject to a minor interference in real world samples, presumably caused by carbonate. The lowest sensitivity is shown by the IC-CD method as slowest method compared, which, in addition, requires a sample pretreatment. The highest amount of information is delivered by IC-PCR-VIS, which allows the simultaneous determination of the seven standard anions and bromate.     

Comparison of on-line coupling of ion-chromatography with atmospheric pressure ionization mass spectrometry and with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry as tools for the ultra-trace analysis of bromate in surface water samples

Ion chromatography in combination with atmospheric pressure ionization mass spectrometry (API-MS) as well as with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) had been compared for trace analysis of bromate. The results indicate that both techniques yield comparable results, which are in excellent agreement with standard methods for bromate determination. Furthermore, both techniques showed almost equal absolute detection limits (approximately 50 pg bromate injected). Contrary to IC-API-MS, IC-ICP-MS can tolerate a higher salt concentration in the mobile phase. This allows the use of high-capacity columns combined with large sample volumes. This lowered the concentration based detection limits by one order of magnitude for IC-ICP-MS compared to IC-API-MS (0.06 microg/l vs. 0.5 microg/l). On the other hand, IC-API-MS is able to allow a positive identification of bromate even in cases when IC does not fully separate bromate from other bromine-containing species. The performance data of both IC-MS techniques have been established by participation in an international round robin test.     

Fluorimetric determination of bromate by ion-exchange separation and post-column derivatization

For the determination of bromate in drinking water a stopped-flow post-column reaction was developed following the separation of bromate from the matrix by an anion-exchange column. In the post-column reaction the analyte was used to oxidize the azo dye sulfonaphtholazoresorcinol, SNAR, and the residual amount was converted into a fluorescent binuclear complex by an excess of gallium ions. The fluorescence was monitored at 585 nm, with a maximum excitation wavelength at 521 nm. The determination of bromate is based on the decrease of the fluorescence intensity with increasing bromate concentration. The given hydrodynamic parameters and the condition of equal flow rates of the two branch streams at each T-piece have to be considered as an important criterion for the experimental set-up. The volume flows and the concentrations required for the reagent solutions in the influent of each T-piece were determined as a result of batch experiments and theoretical considerations. The limit of detection was 0.28 g L^–1bromate for the flow method, which shows linearity up to 15 gL^–1 bromate.     

Determination of trace level bromate and perchlorate in drinking water by ion chromatography with an evaporative preconcentration technique

A simple sample preconcentration technique employing microwave-based evaporation for the determination of trace level bromate and perchlorate in drinking water with ion chromatography is presented. With a hydrophilic anion-exchange column and a sodium hydroxide eluent in linear gradient, bromate and perchlorate can be determined in one injection within 35 min. Prior to ion chromatographic analysis, the drinking water sample was treated with an OnGuard-Ag cartridge to remove the superfluous chloride and concentrated 20-fold using a PTFE beaker in a domestic microwave oven for 15 min.The recoveries of the anions ranged from 94.6% for NO2- to 105.2% for F-. The detection limits for bromate, perchlorate, iodate and chlorate were 0.1, 0.2, 0.1 and 0.2 microg/l, respectively. The developed method is applicable for the quantitation of bromate and perchlorate in drinking water samples.     

孔雀石绿共振光散射法测定饮用水中痕量BrO3-

在pH3.8的HAc-NaAc缓冲液中,BrO3-氧化I-生成I2,I2与过量的I-反应生成I3-,I3-与孔雀石绿(MG)反应形成缔合微粒,导致体系的共振光散射强度急剧增强,最大共振光散射波长位于465nm处,BrO3-浓度在0～120μg/L范围内有较好线性关系,检出限以3σ计算为3.4ng/mL,据此建立了一种测定微量BrO3-的共振光谱新方法.该法用于饮用水中BrO3-的测定,得到了满意的结果.     

Determination of bromate in sea water using multi-dimensional matrix-elimination ion chromatography

A multi-dimensional matrix-elimination ion chromatography approach has been applied to the determination of bromate in seawater samples. Two-dimensional and three-dimensional configurations were evaluated for their efficacy to eliminate the interference caused by the high concentration of ubiquitous ions present in seawater, such as chloride and sulfate. A two-dimensional approach utilising a high capacity second dimension separation comprising two Dionex AS24 columns connected in series was applied successfully and permitted the determination of bromate in undiluted seawater samples injected directly onto the ion chromatography system. Using this approach the limit of detection (LOD) for bromate based on a signal to noise ratio of 3 was 1050 μg/L using a 500 μL injection loop. Good linearity was obtained for bromate with correlation coefficients for the calibration curves of 0.9981 and 0.9996 based on peak height and area, respectively. A three-dimensional method utilising two 10-port switching valves to allow sharing of the second suppressor and detector between the second and third dimension separations showed better resolution and detection for bromate and reduced the LOD to 60 μg/L for spiked seawater samples. Good linearity was maintained with correlation coefficients of 0.9991 for both peak height and area. Ozonated seawater samples were also analysed and exhibited a non-linear increase in bromate level on increasing ozonation time. A bromate concentration in excess of 1770 μg/L was observed following ozonation of the seawater sample for 120 min. Recoveries for the three-dimensional system were 92% and 89% based on peak height and area, respectively, taken over 5 ozonated samples with 3 replicates per sample.     

Spectrophotometric determination of bromate by sequential injection analysis

A simple and rapid on-line spectrophotometric method for the determination of bromate is proposed. The method is based on the reaction of bromate and 2-(5-bromo-2-pyridylazo)-5-diethylaminophenol (5-bromo-PADAP) with SCN⁻, a red complex is formed and monitored at 550 nm. The linear range found is between 0.18 and 3.00 mg l⁻¹ with a detection limit of 0.15 mg l⁻¹. The sampling rate was calculated to be 45 samples per hour. The proposed method has a precision of less than 0.8%.