Dispersion‐Force‐Assisted Disproportionation: A Stable Two‐Coordinate Copper(II) Complex

The synthesis of the first linear coordinated Cu^II complex Cu{N(SiMe₃)Dipp}₂ ( 1 Dipp=C₆H₅‐2,6Prⁱ₂) and its Cu^I counterpart [Cu{N(SiMe₃)Dipp}₂]^? ( 2 ) is described. The formation of 1 proceeds through a dispersion force‐driven disproportionation, and is the reaction product of a Cu^I halide and LiN(SiMe₃)Dipp in a non‐donor solvent. The synthesis of 2 is accomplished by preventing the disproportionation into 1 by using the complexing agent 15‐crown‐5. EPR spectroscopy of 1 provides the first detailed study of a two‐coordinate transition‐metal complex indicating strong covalency in the Cu?N bonds.     

Katalysatordesaktivierungen bei der Acetylen-Polymerisation mit Titanocen- bzw. Zirconocen-Komplexen des Bis(trimethylsilyl)acetylens

Desactivation of Catalysts in the Polymerization of Acetylene by Bis(trimethylsilyl)acetylene Complexes of Titanocene or Zirconocene Unexpected inactive byproducts were observed in the catalytic polymerization of acetylene using metallocene alkyne complexes Cp₂M(L)(η²-Me₃SiC₂SiMe₃), 1 : M = Ti, without L; 2 : M = Zr, L = thf. The reaction of 1 was investigated in detail by NMR to give quantitatively at –20 °C the titanacyclopentadiene Cp₂Ti–CH=CH–C(SiMe₃)=C(SiMe₃) ( 3 ). Around 0 °C 3 starts to rearrange to yield the dihydroindenyl complex 4 via coupling of one Cp-ligand with the titanacyclopentadiene. In the reaction of 2 under analogous conditions a zirconacyclopentadiene Cp₂Zr–CH=CH–C(SiMe₃)=C(SiMe₃) ( 5 ) and the dimeric complex [Cp₂Zr(C(SiMe₃)=CH(SiMe₃)]₂[μ-σ(1,2)-C≡C] ( 6 ) were observed. Whereas 5 decomposes to a mixture of unidentified paramagnetic species, 6 was isolated and investigated by NMR spectroscopy and X-ray analysis. In the reaction of rac-(ebthi)Zr(η²-Me₃SiC₂SiMe₃) (ebthi = ethylenbistetrahydroindenyl) with 2-ethynyl-pyridine the complex rac-(ebthi)ZrC(SiMe₃)=CH(SiMe₃)](σ-C≡CPy) 7 was obtained, which was investigated by an X-ray analysis.     

Cyclic Polysilanes : XIII. Ring closure reactions of α,ω-dichloropermethylpolysilanes; The preparation of heterocyclic phenylphosphapermethylsilanes (PhP)m(SiMe2)n

The reactions of the dichloropermethylsilanes Cl(SiMe₂)_nCl (n = 1?6) with dilithium phenylphosphide yield a series of novel heterocyclic phosphasilanes. For n = 4, 5 and 6, the reaction leads to the corresponding 5-, 6- and 7-membered cyclic monophosphapolysilanes PhP(SiMe₂)_n, but when n = 3, a polymeric material of probable formula [PhP(SiMe₂)₃]_n is formed. For n = 2, ring closure again occurs, to yield the 6-membered P₂Si₄ ring compound [PhP(SiMe₂)₂]₂. With dimethyldichlorosilane, cyclization results in the dimeric phosphasilane (PhPSiMe₂)₂ at ?40°C, and the corresponding trimeric derivative (PhPSiMe₂)₃ at +40°C. These two ring sizes exist in an equilibrium (PhPSiMe₂)₂ ? (PhPSiMe₂)₃, the dimer being stable at room temperature, but being converted into the trimer above 150°C. The ¹H, ¹³C, ²⁹Si and ³¹P NMR parameters are reported for all the compounds, and the chemical shifts and coupling constants interpreted in terms of the molecular and electronic structures of the different ring sizes.     

Manganese(II) Silylamides

Mn[N(SiMe₃)₂]₂(THF) ( I ) (Me = methyl, THF = tetrahydrofuran) was obtained on large scale from “active” MnCl₂ and LiN(SiMe₃)₂ in THE in 85–93% yield. The novel, theoretically interesting tetra-coordinated Mn[N(SiMe₃)₂]₂L₂ series was derived from I , where L = THF, pyridine and t-butyleyanide. All these species are quite stable thermally and exhibit exteme oxygen sensitivity. Preparation, properties, and reactions of unsymmetrically substituted (“hemi”) X? Mn? Y type compounds are presented also, where X = ? Cl, ? NO₃ and n = butyl, and Y = ? N(SiMe₃)₂ and ? OR. From Cl? Mn? N(SiMe₃)₂, with or without coordinated THF being present, the unusual (Mn{SiMe₃)₂, was isolated as yellow crystals. The “hemi” Mn(II)-system exhibits only moderate thermal stability and tends to disproportionate. Many derivatives are photosensitive, especially with UV light.     

Untersuchungen zur Bildung silylierter iso-Tetraphosphane aus P2-chlorierten Triphosphanen und Li-Phosphiden

Investigations on the Formation of Silylated iso-Tetraphosphanes We investigated the formation of iso-tetraphosphanes by reacting [Me(Me₃Si)P]₂PCl 4 , Me(Me₃Si)P? P(Cl)? P(SiMe₃)₂ 8 , Me(Me₃Si)P? P(Cl)? P(SiMe₃)(CMe₃) 9 , [Me(Me₃Si)P]₂PCl 20 , Me₃C(Me₃Si)P? P(Cl)? P(SiMe₃)₂ 21 , and [MeC(Me₃Si)P]₂PCl 22 with LiP(SiMe₃)Me 1 , LiP(SiMe₃)₂ 2 , and LiP(SiMe₃)CMe₃ 3 , respectively, to elucidate possible paths of synthesis, the influence of substituents (Me, SiMe₃, CMe₃) on the course of the reaction, and the properties of the iso-tetraphosphanes. These products are formed via a substitution reaction at the P²Cl group of the iso-triphosphanes. However, with an increasing number of SiMe₃ groups in the triphosphane as well as in reactions with LiP(SiMe₃)Me, cleaving and transmetallation reactions become more and more important. The phosphides 1,2, and 3 attack the PC1 group of 4 yielding the iso-tetraphosphanes P[P(SiMe₃)Me]₃ 5, [Me(Me₃Si)P]₂P? P(SiMe₃)₂ 6 and [Me(Me₃Si)P]₂P? P(SiMe₃)CMe₃ 7. I n reactions With 8 and 9, LiP(SiMe₃)Me causes bond cleavage and mainly leads to Me(Me₃Si)P? P(Me)? P(SiMe₃)₂ 13 and Me(Me₃Si)P? (Me)? P(SiMe₃)CMe₃ 16, resp., and to monophosphanes; minor products are [Me(SiMe₃)P]₂P? P(SiMe₃)₂ 6 and [Me(Me₂Si)P]₂P? P(SiMe₃)CMe₂ 7. LiP(SiMe₃)₂ 2 and LiP(SiMe₃)CMe₂ 3 with 8 and 9 give Me(Me₃,Si)P? P[P(SiMe₃)₂]₂ 10, Me(Me₂Si)P? P[P(SiMe₃)CMe₂]? P(SiMe₃)₂ 11, and Me(Me₃Si)P? P[P(SiMe₃)CMe₃]₂ 12 as favoured products. With 20, LiP(SiMe₃)₂ 2 forms P[P(SiMe₃)₂]₃ 28. Bond cleavage products are obtained in reactions of 20 with 1 and 2, of 21 with 1, 2, and 3, and of 22 with 1 and 2. P[P(SiMe₃)CMe₃]₃ 23 is the main product in the reaction of 22 with LiP(SiMe₃)CRle₂ 3. In the reactions of 22 with 1, 2, and 3 the cyclophosphanes P₃(CMe₃)₂(SiMe₃)25, P₄[P(SiMe₃)CMe₃]₂(CMe₃)₂ 26, and P₅(CMe₃)₄(SiMe₃) 27 are produced. The formation of these rom- pounds begins with bond cleavage in a P- SiMe, group by means of the phosphides. The thermal stability of the iso-tetraphosphanes decreases with an increasing number of silyl groups in the molecule. At 20O°C compounds 5, 7, and 23 are crystals; also 6 is stable; however, 10, It, 12, and 28 decompose already.     

Neue Komplexe des Titans mit Bis(trimethylsilyl)amido-Liganden

New Complexes of Titanium with Bis(trimethylsilyl)amido Ligands The reaction of cp′TiCl₃ with LiN(SiMe₃)₂ · Et₂O 1 yield the compounds cp′TiCl₂N(SiMe₃)₂ (cp′ = C₅H₅ 2 , C₅H₄SiMe₃ 3 , C₅H₃(SiMe₃)₂ 4 , C₅Me₅ 5 ) and cp′TiCl[N(SiMe₃)₂]₂ (cp′ = C₅H₅ 6 ). Compound 2 was characterized by an X-ray structural analysis with space group P2₁/n and unit cell dimensions of a = 1 660.9(7), b = 688.6(3), c = 1 739.1(8) pm and β = 117.18(3)°.     

Synthese und Insertionsreaktionen von Cp2′HfCl{As(SiMe3)2} (Cp′ = C5H4Me)

Synthesis and Insertion Reactions of Cp₂′HfCl{As(SiMe₃)₂} (Cp′ = C₅H₄Me) The reaction of Cp₂′HfCl₂ (Cp′ = C₅H₄Me) with Li(THF)_2,5As(SiMe₃)₂ (1 : 1) at room temperature gives the terminal hafnocene arsenido complex Cp₂′HfCl{As(SiMe₃)₂} ( 1 ) in high yield. 1 inserts CS₂ and PhNC into the Hf? As bond yielding Cp₂′HfCl{η²-S₂CAs(SiMe₃)₂} ( 2 ) and Cp₂′HfCl{η²-N(Ph)CAs(SiMe₃)₂} ( 3 ). The thermally sensitive complexes 1–3 were characterised spectroscopically and crystal structure determinations were carried out on 1 and 3 which shows the η² bonding mode of the N(Ph)CAs(SiMe₃)₂ ligand in the latter.     

[Ge9{Si(SiMe3)3}2{Ge(SiMe3)3}]–: The Mixed Substituted Metalloid Germanium Cluster and the Intermetalloid Cluster [ZnGe18{Si(SiMe3)3}4{Ge(SiMe3)3}2]

The novel metalloid germanium cluster [Ge₉(Hyp)₂Hyp^Ge]^– ( 1 ) was synthesized, exhibiting two different bulky groups [Hyp = Si(SiMe₃)₃; Hyp^Ge = Ge(SiMe₃)₃]. Further reaction of 1 with ZnCl₂ gives the derivative [ZnGe₁₈(Hyp)₄(Hyp^Ge)₂] ( 2 ) in good yield, showing that the substitution of Si(SiMe₃)₃ by Ge(SiMe₃)₃ within a metalloid Ge₉R₃^– compound leads to a comparable reactivity. 1 and 2 are characterized by NMR spectroscopy, mass spectrometry ( 1 ) and single crystal structure analyses ( 2 ). 1 and 2 are the first metalloid germanium clusters bearing germyl groups.     

Ga2Br2R2 und Ga3I2R3 [R = C(SiMe3)3] — zwei neue elementorganische Galliumsubhalogenide mit einer bzw. zwei Ga‐Ga‐Bindungen

Ga₂Br₂R₂ and Ga₃I₂R₃ [R = C(SiMe₃)₃] — Two New Organoelement Subhalides of Gallium Containing One or Two Ga‐Ga Single Bonds The oxidation of the tetrahedral tetragallium cluster Ga₄[C(SiMe₃)₃]₄ ( 1 ) with elemental bromine in the presence of AlBr₃ yielded the corresponding gallium subhalide Ga₂Br₂R₂ [ 4 , R = C(SiMe₃)₃], which remains monomer even in the solid state and in which the Ga^II atoms are connected by a short Ga‐Ga single bond [243.2(2) pm]. The analogous diiodide Ga₂I₂R₂ ( 3 ), which was obtained on a similar route by our group only recently, did not react with lithium tert‐butanolate by substitution as originally expected. Instead, partial disproportionation occurred with the formation of the trigallium diiodide Ga₃I₂R₃ ( 6 ), in which three Ga atoms are connected by two Ga‐Ga single bonds (255.1 pm on average). Both terminal Ga atoms have a coordination number of four owing to the bridging function of both iodine atoms, while the inner one which has an oxidation number of +1 remains coordinatively unsaturated. An average oxidation state of 1.66 resulted for all atoms of the chain. The Ga^III compound {[GaI(R)(OCMe₃)(OH)]Li}₂ ( 7 ) was isolated as the second product of the disproportionation. It is a dimer in the solid state via Li‐O bridges and shows a hindered rotation of its tert‐butyl group.     

Chemo‐ and Regioselective C(sp3)H Arylation of Unactivated Allylarenes by Deprotonative Cross‐Coupling

The combination of aryl bromides, allylbenzene, base and a palladium catalyst usually results in a Heck reaction. Herein we combine these same reagents, but override the Heck pathway by employing a strong base. In the presence of LiN(SiMe₃)₂, allylbenzene derivatives undergo reversible deprotonation. Transmetalation of the resulting allyllithium intermediate to LPdAr(Br) and reductive elimination provide the 1,1‐diarylprop‐2‐enes, which are not accessible by the Heck reaction. The regioselectivity in this deprotonative cross‐coupling process is catalyst‐controlled and very high.     

Reaktionen silylierter Cyclotetraphosphane mit Lithiumalkylen

Reactions of Silylated Cyclotetraphosphanes with Lithium Alkyles While the cyclotetraphosphanes P₄(CMe₃)₃SiMe₃ 1 and trans-P₄(CMe₃)₂(SiMe₃)₂ 2 in reaction with LiR (R = Me, n-Bu) in THF yield the cyclic phosphides LiP₄(CMe₃)₃ 3 and trans-LiP₄(CMe₃)₂SiMe₃ 4 , respectively, the compounds P₄(SiMe₃)₄ 5 , P₄(SiMe₃)₃ CMe₃ 6 and cis-P₄(CMe₃)₂(SiMe₃)₂ 7 by cleavage of a P? P bond produce primary n-tetraphosphides, which rearrange (1,3-shift of Li/SiMe₃) in THF even at low temperature to form the corresponding secondary n-tetraphosphides. Warming these solutions to room temperature initiates consecutive reactions including elimination of LiP(SiMe₃)₂, (Me₃Si)₃P, RP(SiMe₃)₂ and producing P-rich compounds. In this way Li₃P₇ is obtained as main-product from compound 5 , and LiP₅(CMe₃)₄, LiP₃(CMe₃)₂, P₄(CMe₃)₄ from compound 7 . However, the reaction of 6 and LiR gives raise only to traces of Li₃P₇ and Li₂P₇CMe₃. The above mentioned primary as well as the secondary n-tetraphosphides generate stable n-tetraphosphane derivatives by reaction with Me₃SiCl, or MeCl, respectively.     

Chemo‐ and Regioselective C(sp3)?H Arylation of Unactivated Allylarenes by Deprotonative Cross‐Coupling

The combination of aryl bromides, allylbenzene, base and a palladium catalyst usually results in a Heck reaction. Herein we combine these same reagents, but override the Heck pathway by employing a strong base. In the presence of LiN(SiMe₃)₂, allylbenzene derivatives undergo reversible deprotonation. Transmetalation of the resulting allyllithium intermediate to LPdAr(Br) and reductive elimination provide the 1,1‐diarylprop‐2‐enes, which are not accessible by the Heck reaction. The regioselectivity in this deprotonative cross‐coupling process is catalyst‐controlled and very high.     

Formation and chemical behaviour of silylated phosphanes

Abstract

Our investigations to be presented here have their origin in a number of former results: The formation of [(Me₃Si)₂P]₂SiMe₂ [1] and its rearrangement to P₄(SiMe₂)₆ (a molecule with adamantane structure) and P(SiMe₃)₃, the formation of P₇(SiMe₃)₃ and of some cyclic phosphanes by the thermally induced rearrangement of [(Me₃Si)₂)P]₂SiMe₂ [3], and the formation of P₇(SiMe₃)₃ by reacting P₄ with Na/K-alloy and Me₃SiCl. After finding LiP(SiMe₃)₂ to be such a versatile reagent we turned to elucidate synthesis and chemical behaviour of LiP[P(SiMe₃)₂]₂.     

Structural and Magnetic Diversity in Alkali‐Metal Manganate Chemistry: Evaluating Donor and Alkali‐Metal Effects in Co‐complexation Processes

By exploring co‐complexation reactions between the manganese alkyl Mn(CH₂SiMe₃)₂ and the heavier alkali‐metal alkyls M(CH₂SiMe₃) (M=Na, K) in a benzene/hexane solvent mixture and in some cases adding Lewis donors (bidentate TMEDA, 1,4‐dioxane, and 1,4‐diazabicyclo[2,2,2] octane (DABCO)) has produced a new family of alkali‐metal tris(alkyl) manganates. The influences that the alkali metal and the donor solvent impose on the structures and magnetic properties of these ates have been assessed by a combination of X‐ray, SQUID magnetization measurements, and EPR spectroscopy. These studies uncover a diverse structural chemistry ranging from discrete monomers [(TMEDA)₂MMn(CH₂SiMe₃)₃] (M=Na, 3 ; M=K, 4 ) to dimers [{KMn(CH₂SiMe₃)₃?C₆H₆}₂] ( 2 ) and [{NaMn(CH₂SiMe₃)₃}₂(dioxane)₇] ( 5 ); and to more complex supramolecular networks [{NaMn(CH₂SiMe₃)₃}_∞] ( 1 ) and [{Na₂Mn₂(CH₂SiMe₃)₆(DABCO)₂}_∞] ( 7 )). Interestingly, the identity of the alkali metal exerts a significant effect in the reactions of 1 and 2 with 1,4‐dioxane, as 1 produces coordination adduct 5 , while 2 forms heteroleptic [{(dioxane)₆K₂Mn₂(CH₂SiMe₃)₄(O(CH₂)₂OCH=CH₂)₂}_∞] ( 6 ) containing two alkoxide–vinyl anions resulting from α‐metalation and ring opening of dioxane. Compounds 6 and 7 , containing two spin carriers, exhibit antiferromagnetic coupling of their S=5/2 moments with varying intensity depending on the nature of the exchange pathways.     

Studien zur Reaktion von [Me2AlP(SiMe3)2]2 mit basenstabilisierten Organogalliumchloriden und ‐hydriden

Investigations on the Reactivity of [Me₂AlP(SiMe₃)₂]₂ with Base‐stabilized Organogalliumhalides and ‐hydrides [Me₂AlP(SiMe₃)₂]₂ ( 1 ) reacts with dmap?Ga(Cl)Me₂, dmap?Ga(Me)Cl₂, dmap?GaCl₃ and dmap?Ga(H)Me₂ with Al‐P bond cleavage and subsequent formation of heterocyclic [Me₂GaP(SiMe₃)₂]₂ ( 2 ) as well as dmap?AlMe_xCl_3?x (x = 3 8 ; 2 3 ; 1 4 ; 0 5 ). The reaction between equimolar amounts of dmap?Al(Me₂)P(SiMe₃)₂ and dmap?Ga(t‐Bu₂)Cl yield dmap?Ga(t‐Bu₂)P(SiMe₃)₂ ( 6 ) and dmap?AlMe₂Cl ( 3 ). 2 – 8 were characterized by NMR spectroscopy, 2 and 6 also by single crystal X‐ray diffraction.     

Synthese eines funktionalen Aluminiumalkinids,Me3C‐C≡C‐AlBr2, und dessen Reaktionen mit der sperrigen Lithiumverbindung LiCH(SiMe3)2

Synthesis of a Functional Aluminium Alkynide, Me₃C‐C≡C‐AlBr₂, and its Reactions with the Bulky Lithium Compound LiCH(SiMe₃)₂ Treatment of aluminium tribromide with the lithium alkynide (Li)C≡C‐CMe₃ afforded the aluminium alkynide Me₃C‐C≡C‐AlBr₂ ( 1 ) in an almost quantitative yield. 1 crystallizes with trimeric formula units possessing Al₃C₃ heterocycles and the anionic carbon atoms of the alkynido groups in the bridging positions. A dynamic equilibrium was determined in solution which probably comprises trimeric and dimeric formula units. Reaction of 1 with one equivalent of LiCH(SiMe₃)₂ yielded the compound [Me₃C‐C≡C‐Al(Br)‐CH(SiMe₃)₂]₂ ( 2 ), which is a dimer via Al‐C‐Al bridges. Two equivalents of the lithium compound gave a mixture of four main‐products, which could be identified as 2 , Li[Me₃C‐C≡C‐Al{CH(SiMe₃)₂}₃] ( 3 ), Me₃C‐C≡C‐Al[CH(SiMe₃)₂]₂ ( 4 ), and Al[CH(SiMe₃)₂]₃. The lithium atom of 3 is coordinated by the C≡C triple bond and an inner carbon atom of one bis(trimethylsilyl)methyl group. Further interactions were observed to C‐H bonds of methyl groups.     

Synthesis and characterization of [(Me3SiCH2)2GaP(SiMe3)2]2, an example of a gallium-phosphorus dimer obtainable only through an indirect reaction pathway

The dimeric gallium-phosphorus compound [(Me₃Si-CH₂)₂GaP(SiMe₃)₂]₂ ( 1 ) was prepared from the 1:1 mole ratio lithium-halide elimination reaction of (Me₃SiCH₂)₂GaP(SiMe₃)₂Ga(CH₂SiMe₃)₂Cl with LiP-(SiMe₃)₂ in benzene solution and has been characterized through multinuclear solution NMR, partial elemental analysis, and single-crystal X-ray analysis. Compound 1 could not be obtained from the direct reactions of (Me₃SiCH₂)₂GaCl with P(SiMe₃)₃ or LiP(SiMe₃)₂. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Heteroatom Chem 9:147–150, 1998     

Simple Access to the Heaviest Alkaline Earth Metal Hydride: A Strongly Reducing Hydrocarbon‐Soluble Barium Hydride Cluster

Reaction of Ba[N(SiMe₃)₂]₂ with PhSiH₃ in toluene gave simple access to the unique Ba hydride cluster Ba₇H₇[N(SiMe₃)₂]₇ that can be described as a square pyramid spanned by five Ba²⁺ ions with two flanking BaH[N(SiMe₃)₂] units. This heptanuclear cluster is well soluble in aromatic solvents, and the hydride ¹H NMR signals and coupling pattern suggests that the structure is stable in solution. At 95 °C, no coalescence of hydride signals is observed but the cluster slowly decomposes to undefined barium hydride species. The complex Ba₇H₇[N(SiMe₃)₂]₇ is a very strong reducing agent that already at room temperature reacts with Me₃SiCH=CH₂, norbornadiene, and ethylene. The highly reactive alkyl barium intermediates cannot be observed and deprotonate the (Me₃Si)₂N⁻ ion, as confirmed by the crystal structure of Ba₁₄H₁₂[N(SiMe₃)₂]₁₂[(Me₃Si)(Me₂SiCH₂)N]₄.     

Synthese und Eigenschaften teilsilylierter Tri- und Tetraphosphane. Reaktionen lithiierter Diphosphane mit Chlorphosphanen

Synthesis and Properties of Partially Silylated Tri- and Tetraphosphanes. Reaction of Lithiated Diphosphanes with Chlorophosphanes The reactions of Li(Me₃Si)P? P(SiMe₃)(CMe₃) 1 , Li(Me₃Si)P? P(CMe₃)₂ 2 , and Li(Me₃C)P? P(SiMe₃)(CMe₃) 3 with the chlorophosphanes P(SiMe₃)(CMe₃)Cl, P(CMe₃)₂Cl, or P(CMe₃)Cl₂ generate the triphosphanes [(Me₃C)(Me₃Si)P]₂P(SiMe₃) 4 , (Me₃C)(Me₃Si)P? P(SiMe₃)? P(CMe₃)₂ 6 , [(Me₃C)₂P]₂P(SiMe₃) 7 , and (Me₃C)(Me₃Si)P? P(SiMe₃)? P(CMe₃)Cl 8 . The triphosphane (Me₃C)₂P? P(SiMe₃)? P(SiMe₃)₂ 5 is not obtainable as easily. The access to 5 starts by reacting PCl₃ with P(SiMe₃)(CMe₃)₂, forming (Me₃C)₂ P? PCl₂, which then with LiP(SiMe₃)₂ gives (Me₃C)₂ P? P(Cl)? P(SiMe₃)₂ 11 . Treating 11 with LiCMe₃ generates (Me₃C)₂P? P(H)? P(SiMe₃)₂ 16 , which can be lithiated by LiBu to give (Me₃C)₂P? P(Li)? P(SiMe₃)₂ 13 and after reacting with Me₃SiCl, finally yields 5 . 8 is stable at ?70°C and undergoes cyclization to P₃(SiMe₃)(CMe₃)₂ in the course of warming to ambient temperature, while Me₃SiCl is split off. 7 , reacting with MeOH, forms [(Me₃C)₂P]₂PH. (Me₃C)₂P? P(Li)? P(SiMe₃)₂ 18 , which can be obtained by the reaction of 5 with LiBu, decomposes forming (Me₃C)₂P? P(Li)(SiMe₃), P(SiMe₃)₃, and LiP(SiMe₃)₂, in contrast to either (Me₃C)₂P? P(Li)? P(SiMe₃)(CMe₃) 19 or [(Me₃C)₂P]₂PLi, which are stable in ether solutions. The Li phosphides 1 , 2 , and 3 with BrH₂C? CH₂Br form the n-tetraphosphanes (Me₃C)(Me₃Si)P? [P(SiMe₃)]₂? P(SiMe₃)(CMe₃) 23 , (Me₃C)₂P? [P(SiMe₃)]₂? P(CMe₃)₂ 24 , and (Me₃C)(Me₃Si)P? [P(CMe₃)]₂? P(SiMe₃)(CMe₃) 25 , respectively. Li(Me₃Si)P? P(SiMe₃)₂, likewise, generates (Me₃Si)₂P? [P(SiMe₃)]₂? P(SiMe₃)₂ 26 . Just as the n-triphosphanes 4 , 5 , 6 , and 7 , the n-tetraphosphanes 23 , 24 , and 25 can be isolated as crystalline compounds. 23 , treated with LiBu, does nor form any stable n-tetraphosphides, whereas 24 yields (Me₃C)₂P? P(Li)? P(SiMe₃)? P(CMe₃)₂, that is stable in ethers. With MeOH, 24 , forms crystals of (Me₃C)₂P? P(H)? P(SiMe₃)? P(CMe₃)₂.     

Tris(tris(trimethylsilyl)silyl)gallium,Ga{Si(Si(CH3)3)3}3

The title compound has been prepared in good yield by the reaction of gallium trichloride with base‐free hypersilyl lithium (Li–Si(SiMe₃)₃, Me = CH₃) in a 1 : 3 molar ratio. Ga(Si(SiMe₃)₃)₃ is monomeric in solution and in the solid state. The compound has been characterized with NMR, IR and Raman techniques as well as by an X‐ray structure determination (planar GaSi₃‐skeleton, monoclinic space group P2₁/c, Z = 4, d(Ga–Si) = 249,8 ± 0,2 pm).