UV-Vis-草酸铁络合物-H2O2体系产生羟自由基的Fe(phen)23+光度法测定

UV－Vis－草酸铁络合物－H2O2法是一种新的高级氧化工艺，该工艺产生的羟自由基·OH具有极强的氧化能力，可与水中大多数有机物迅速反应而使其降解；用Fe(phen)23+光度法研究了该体系中羟自由基·OH产生的规律，·OH可将Fe(phen)23+(Fe2＋－菲咯啉络合物)氧化成Fe(phen)23+(Fe3＋－菲咯啉络合物),通过测定Fe(phen)23+在508nm处吸光度的变化可间接求出·OH的生成量；结果表明，在pH=4.0,=1∶5∶10（化学计量数）时，·OH的生成量最大;该分析方法具有简单、快速的优点。     

普利沙星与Co(phen)_3~(2+)及DNA间结合作用的电化学和光谱

利用电化学和紫外光谱法研究了邻菲咯啉合钴(Co(phen)32+)与普利沙星(PLFX)及DNA间在pH=7.4的三羟甲基氨基甲烷-盐酸缓冲溶液中的结合作用。紫外光谱测量结果表明,普利沙星与Co(phen)32+发生了结合作用形成二元络合物,结合常数为2.0×104L/mol。电化学测量表明,在Co(phen)32+-普利沙星络合物中加入DNA后,Co(phen)32+-普利沙星络合物的峰电流下降,峰电位差增大了17 mV,式电位负移了3.5 mV,推断络合物与DNA作用方式主要为静电作用。     

SDS-乙醇-水中［Fe（phen）3］2+介导双酚A的伏安检测

应用循环伏安法和微分脉冲伏安法研究了十二烷基硫酸钠(SDS)-乙醇-水体系中[Fe(phen)3]2+(phen=1,10-邻菲咯啉)介导双酚A(BPA)氧化的反应机理及其伏安检测。结果表明:在SDS-乙醇-水体系中,铟锡氧化物(ITO)电极上[Fe(phen)3]2+对BPA呈现出良好的电催化氧化活性,电催化效果受乙醇-水体积比、SDS及BPA浓度的影响。在乙醇-水(1∶5)体系中,0.25 mmol·L-1SDS的加入增强了ITO电极上[Fe(phen)3]2+对BPA的电催化氧化作用。在乙醇-水(1∶5)和0.25 mmol·L-1SDS体系中,BPA在微分脉冲伏安图上约0.731 V处有明显的电催化氧化峰,峰电流在0.2~20μmol·L-1内呈良好的线性关系(r=0.999 9),检出限为0.034μmol·L-1,相对标准偏差(n=3)为2.1%。将该体系用于水样中BPA的测定,回收率为96.9%~100.7%。该文还讨论了SDS-乙醇-水体系中[Fe(phen)3]2+介导BPA氧化的反应机理。该研究有助于更好地理解微乳体系中氧化还原媒介体对酚类污染物的电催化氧化机理,可为电化学传感器的构建提供新思路。     

以氯醌酸二价阴离子为桥联配体的Fe(Ⅲ)-Fe(Ⅲ)和Mn(Ⅱ)-Mn(Ⅱ)双核配合物的合成与磁性

基于铁和锰的双核配合物在生物氧化还原过程中的重要作用及在化学的氧化还原过程中可能做为催化剂的应用前景,本文合成了两个新的以氯醌酸二价阴离子为桥联配体的Fe(Ⅲ)双核和Mn(Ⅱ)双核配合物:[Fe_2(phen)_4(μ-CA)](ClO_4)_4·2H_2O(1)和[Mn_2(phen)_4(μ-CA)](ClO_4)_2·3H_2O(2)(phen=1,10菲咯啉;CA=氯醌酸二价阴离子)。经元素分析、IR、电子光谱及磁性等测定,对两配合物进行了表征。     

普利沙星与Co(phen)2+3及DNA间结合作用的电化学和光谱

利用电化学和紫外光谱法研究了邻菲咯啉合钴(Co(phen)2+3)与普利沙星(PLFX)及DNA间在pH=7.4的三羟甲基氨基甲烷-盐酸缓冲溶液中的结合作用. 紫外光谱测量结果表明,普利沙星与Co(phen)2+3发生了结合作用形成二元络合物,结合常数为2.0×104 L/mol. 电化学测量表明,在Co(phen)2+3-普利沙星络合物中加入DNA后,Co(phen)2+3-普利沙星络合物的峰电流下降,峰电位差增大了17 mV,式电位负移了3.5 mV,推断络合物与DNA作用方式主要为静电作用.     

邻苯二甲酸根桥联镍配位聚合物的合成与晶体结构

合成了邻苯二甲酸根桥联镍配位聚合物{ [ Ni(phth) (phen) (H2O) ]·H2O}n(phth:邻苯二甲酸根二价阴离子;phen: 1, 10-邻菲咯啉),并得到了它的单晶.用X射线单晶衍射法测定了配合物的晶体结构.     

茜素红S催化动力学光度法测定痕量铁(Ⅲ)及反应机理探讨

在pH4.5的NaAc-HAc缓冲介质中,以邻菲咯啉(phen)作活化剂,痕量Fe(Ⅲ)对H2O2氧化茜素红S(ARS)的褪色反应存在明显的催化作用,由此建立了测定痕量铁(Ⅲ)的催化动力学光度法。采用固定时间法,在λmax=422nm处,对催化体系和非催化体系进行光度测定,应用了正交试验法确定最佳条件,测定了有关动力学参数。该方法的检出限为0.63μg/L;线性范围为0~20μg/L,应用于一次蒸馏水、分析纯盐酸中痕量铁的测定,结果令人满意。提出了Fe(Ⅲ)-ARS-phen三元络合物活性中间体的催化反应机理设想,并推测催化反应经历了羟自由基氧化反应的历程。     

[Mn(phen)3](ClO4)2(H2O)·0.5(azpy)的合成和晶体结构

锰在生物体系的新陈代谢过程中有重要作用。锰有机配合物的研究成为生物无机化学研究领域的一个热点[1]。本文报道用高氯酸锰、1,10 邻菲咯啉和4,4 偶氮联吡啶[2 4]合成的锰配合物[Mn(phen)3](ClO4)2(H2O)·0 5(azpy)的晶体结构。1　实验部分1 1　Mn(Ⅱ)配合物的合成将0 0724g(0 2mmol)Mn(ClO4)2·6H2O溶于8mL水,缓慢加入含有0 1190g(0 6mmol)1,10 邻菲咯啉(phen)和0 0277g(0 15mmol)4,4′ 偶氮联吡啶(azpy)的15mL甲醇溶液,搅拌0 5h,室温下静置,一周后得[Mn(phen)3](ClO4)2(H2O)·0 5(azpy)晶体。元素分析(计算值)/%:C54 19(54 …     

在线氧化还原流动注射分光光度法测定多贝斯

建立了在线氧化还原流动注射分光光度法测定多贝斯的新方法。研究了多贝斯与Fe3 + 的反应摩尔比和各种影响因素 ,发现Fe3 + 可以定量氧化多贝斯。产生的Fe2 + 与邻菲咯啉在弱酸性介质中生成稳定的红色络合物 ,该络合物在 5 12nm处的最大吸收与多贝斯浓度在 4 .2 4× 10 -6～ 4 .6 6× 10 -5mol/L范围内呈线性关系。回归系数为 0 .9987;方法的检出限为 5 .3× 10 -7mol/L ;相对标准偏差为 0 .5 % (n =8) ;采样率为 30次/h。     

超细粉体二硫纶·取代菲咯啉铁(Ⅱ)配合物的光敏性研究

报道了新近合成的二硫纶·取代菲咯啉铁 (Ⅱ )配合物FeLL′(L =mnt2 - ,1 ,2 二氰基乙烯 1 ,2 二硫醇离子 ,L′ =phen 5,6 dione,1 ,1 0 菲咯啉 5,6 二酮 ;5 NO2 phen ,5 硝基 1 ,1 0 菲咯啉 )的电子吸收光谱、电子发射光谱及对CdS的光敏性 ,研究了FeLL′对CdS的光敏化作用与其电子光谱间的关系     

Double silyl migration converting ORe[N(SiMe(2)CH(2)PCy(2))(2)] to NRe[O(SiMe(2)CH(2)PCy(2))(2)] substructures

The reaction of (R(2)PCH(2)SiMe(2))(2)NM (PNP(R)M; R = Cy; M = Li, Na, MgHal, Ag) with L(2)ReOX(3) [L(2) = (Ph(3)P)(2) or (Ph(3)PO)(Me(2)S); X = Cl, Br] gives (PNP(Cy))ReOX(2) as two isomers, mer,trans and mer,cis. These compounds undergo a double Si migration from N to O at 90 degrees C to form (POP(Cy))ReNX(2) as a mixture of mer,trans and fac,cis isomers. Additional thermolysis effects migration of CH(3) from Si to Re, along with compensating migration of halide from Re to Si. DFT calculations on various structural isomers support the greater thermodynamic stability of the POP/ReN isomer vs PNP/ReO and highlight the influence of the template effect on the reactivities of these species.     

Transformation of organic molecules on the low-valent [M(Ph(2)PCH(2)CH(2)PPh(2))(2)] moiety derived from trans-[M(N(2))(2)(Ph(2)PCH(2)CH(2)PPh(2))(2)] or related complexes (M = Mo, W)

A zero-valent [M(Ph(2)PCH(2)CH(2)PPh(2))(2)] moiety (M = Mo, W) generated in situ by dissociation of the N(2) ligands in trans-[M(N(2))(2)(Ph(2)PCH(2)CH(2)PPh(2))(2)] can activate pi-accepting organic molecules including isocyanides and nitriles, which undergo the electrophilic attack caused by a strong pi-donation from a zero-valent metal center. Cleavage of a variety of C-X bonds (X = H, C, N, O, P, halogen) also occurs at their electron-rich sites through oxidative addition to form reactive intermediates, which subsequently degradate to yield smaller molecules either bound to or dissociated from the metal center. The mechanism is substantiated unambiguously by isolation of numerous intermediate stages.     

Diverse evolution of [[Ph(2)P(CH(2))(n)PPh(2)]Pt(mu-S)(2)Pt[Ph(2)P(CH(2))(n)PPh(2)]] (n = 2, 3) metalloligands in CH(2)Cl(2)

The nucleophilicity of the [Pt(2)S(2)] core in [[Ph(2)P(CH(2))(n)PPh(2)]Pt(mu-S)(2)Pt[Ph(2)P(CH(2))(n)PPh(2)]] (n = 3, dppp (1); n = 2, dppe (2)) metalloligands toward the CH(2)Cl(2) solvent has been thoroughly studied. Complex 1, which has been obtained and characterized by X-ray diffraction, is structurally related to 2 and consists of dinuclear molecules with a hinged [Pt(2)S(2)] central ring. The reaction of 1 and 2 with CH(2)Cl(2) has been followed by means of (31)P, (1)H, and (13)C NMR, electrospray ionization mass spectrometry, and X-ray data. Although both reactions proceed at different rates, the first steps are common and lead to a mixture of the corresponding mononuclear complexes [Pt[Ph(2)P(CH(2))(n)PPh(2)](S(2)CH(2))], n = 3 (7), 2 (8), and [Pt[Ph(2)P(CH(2))(n)PPh(2)]Cl(2)], n = 3 (9), 2 (10). Theoretical calculations give support to the proposed pathway for the disintegration process of the [Pt(2)S(2)] ring. Only in the case of 1, the reaction proceeds further yielding [Pt(2)(dppp)(2)[mu-(SCH(2)SCH(2)S)-S,S']]Cl(2) (11). To confirm the sequence of the reactions leading from 1 and 2 to the final products 9 and 11 or 8 and 10, respectively, complexes 7, 8, and 11 have been synthesized and structurally characterized. Additional experiments have allowed elucidation of the reaction mechanism involved from 7 to 11, and thus, the origin of the CH(2) groups that participate in the expansion of the (SCH(2)S)(2-) ligand in 7 to afford the bridging (SCH(2)SCH(2)S)(2-) ligand in 11 has been established. The X-ray structure of 11 is totally unprecedented and consists of a hinged [(dppp)Pt(mu-S)(2)Pt(dppp)] core capped by a CH(2)SCH(2) fragment.     

Synthesis and Structural Characterization of Cu（pic）2[CO（NH2）2]2 and （picH2）2[Cu（pic）2（SCN）2]

1 INTRODUCTION The picolinic acid (picH), also called pyridine- 2-carboxylic acid, has a broad spectrum of physio- logical effects on the activity functions of both ani- mal and plant organisms. It is attributed increasing interest due to its ability to …     

New layered materials: syntheses, structures, and optical properties of K(2)TiCu(2)S(4), Rb(2)TiCu(2)S(4), Rb(2)TiaAg(2)S(4), Cs(2)TiAg(2)sS(4), and Cs(2)TiCu(2)Se(4)

The new compounds K(2)TiCu(2)S(4), Rb(2)TiCu(2)S(4), Rb(2)TiAg(2)S(4), Cs(2)TiAg(2)S(4), and Cs(2)TiCu(2)Se(4) have been synthesized by the reactions of A(2)Q(3) (A = K, Rb, Cs; Q = S, Se) with Ti, M (M = Cu or Ag), and Q at 823 K. The compounds Rb(2)TiCu(2)S(4), Cs(2)TiAg(2)S(4), and Cs(2)TiCu(2)Se(4) are isostructural. They crystallize with two formula units in space group P4(2)/mcm of the tetragonal system in cells of dimensions a = 5.6046(4) A, c = 13.154(1) A for Rb(2)TiCu(2)S(4), a =6.024(1) A, c = 13.566(4) A for Cs(2)TiAg(2)S(4), and a =5.852(2) A, c =14.234(5) A for Cs(2)TiCu(2)Se(4) at 153 K. Their structure is closely related to that of Cs(2)ZrAg(2)Te(4) and comprises [TiM(2)Q(4)(2)(-)] layers, which are separated by alkali metal atoms. The [TiM(2)Q(4)(2)(-)] layer is anti-fluorite-like with both Ti and M atoms tetrahedrally coordinated to Q atoms. Tetrahedral coordination of Ti(4+) is rare in the solid state. On the basis of unit cell and space group determinations, the compounds K(2)TiCu(2)S(4) and Rb(2)TiAg(2)S(4) are isostructural with the above compounds. The band gaps of K(2)TiCu(2)S(4), Rb(2)TiCu(2)S(4), Rb(2)TiAg(2)S(4), and Cs(2)TiAg(2)S(4) are 2.04, 2.19, 2.33, and 2.44 eV, respectively, as derived from optical measurements. From band-structure calculations, the optical absorption for an A(2)TiM(2)Q(4) compound is assigned to a transition from an M d and Q p valence band (HOMO) to a Ti 3d conduction band.     

Gas-phase coordination complexes of U(VI)O2(2+), Np(VI)O2(2+), and Pu(VI)O2(2+) with dimethylformamide

Electrospray ionization of actinyl perchlorate solutions in H₂O with 5% by volume of dimethylformamide (DMF) produced the isolatable gas-phase complexes, [An^VIO₂(DMF)₃(H₂O)]²⁺ and [An^VIO₂(DMF)₄]²⁺, where An = U, Np, and Pu. Collision-induced dissociation confirmed the composition of the dipositive coordination complexes, and produced doubly- and singly-charged fragment ions. The fragmentation products reveal differences in underlying chemistries of uranyl, neptunyl, and plutonyl, including the lower stability of Np(VI) and Pu(VI) compared with U(VI).     

Polymer imprinting with iron-oxo-hydroxo clusters: [Fe6O2(OH)2(O2CC(Cl)=CH2)12(H2O)2], [Fe6O2(OH)2(O2C-Ph-(CH)=CH2)12(H2O)2] and [{Fe(O2CC(Cl)=CH2)(OMe)2}10

We report the syntheses of imprinted polymers using iron-oxo-hydroxo clusters as templates. Three new iron clusters, [Fe(6)O(2)(OH)(2)(O(2)CC(Cl)=CH(2))(12)(H(2)O)(2)] (1), [{Fe(O(2)CC(Cl)=CH(2))(OMe)(2)}(10)] (2) and [Fe(6)O(2)(OH)(2)(O(2)C-Ph-(CH)=CH(2))(12)(H(2)O)(2)] (3) have been prepared from commercially-available carboxylic acids. Cluster-imprinted-polymers (CIPs) of 1, 2 and 3 were prepared with ethylene glycol dimethacrylate monomer, and of 1 with methyl methacrylate monomer. The imprinted sites within the CIPs were examined using EXAFS and diffuse reflectance UV/vis spectroscopy, demonstrating that the clusters 1, 2 and 3 were incorporated intact within the polymers. Extraction of the clusters from the CIPs imprinted with 1 and 3 gave new polymers that showed evidence of an imprinting effect.     

Expanding the remarkable structural diversity of uranyl tellurites: hydrothermal preparation and structures of K[UO(2)Te(2)O(5)(OH)], Tl(3)[(UO(2))(2)[Te(2)O(5)(OH)](Te(2)O(6))].2H(2)O,beta-Tl(2)[UO(2)(TeO(3))(2)], and Sr(3)[UO(2)(TeO(3))(2)](TeO(3))(2)

The reactions of UO(2)(C(2)H(3)O(2))(2).2H(2)O with K(2)TeO(3).H(2)O, Na(2)TeO(3) and TlCl, or Na(2)TeO(3) and Sr(OH)(2).8H(2)O under mild hydrothermal conditions yield K[UO(2)Te(2)O(5)(OH)] (1), Tl(3)[(UO(2))(2)[Te(2)O(5)(OH)](Te(2)O(6))].2H(2)O (2) and beta-Tl(2)[UO(2)(TeO(3))(2)] (3), or Sr(3)[UO(2)(TeO(3))(2)](TeO(3))(2) (4), respectively. The structure of 1 consists of tetragonal bipyramidal U(VI) centers that are bound by terminal oxo groups and tellurite anions. These UO(6) units span between one-dimensional chains of corner-sharing, square pyramidal TeO(4) polyhedra to create two-dimensional layers. Alternating corner-shared oxygen atoms in the tellurium oxide chains are protonated to create short/long bonding patterns. The one-dimensional chains of corner-sharing TeO(4) units found in 1 are also present in 2. However, in 2 there are two distinct chains present, one where alternating corner-shared oxygen atoms are protonated, and one where the chains are unprotonated. The uranyl moieties in 2 are bound by five oxygen atoms from the tellurite chains to create seven-coordinate pentagonal bipyramidal U(VI). The structures of 3 and 4 both contain one-dimensional [UO(2)(TeO(3))(2)](2-) chains constructed from tetragonal bipyramidal U(VI) centers that are bridged by tellurite anions. The chains differ between 3 and 4 in that all of the pyramidal tellurite anions in 3 have the same orientation, whereas the tellurite anions in 4 have opposite orientations on each side of the chain. In 4, there are also additional isolated TeO(3)(2-) anions present. Crystallographic data: 1, orthorhombic, space group Cmcm, a = 7.9993(5) A, b = 8.7416(6) A, c = 11.4413(8) A, Z = 4; 2, orthorhombic, space group Pbam, a = 10.0623(8) A, b = 23.024(2) A, c = 7.9389(6) A, Z = 4; 3, monoclinic, space group P2(1)/n, a = 5.4766(4) A, b = 8.2348(6) A, c = 20.849(3) A, beta = 92.329(1) degrees, Z = 4; 4, monoclinic, space group C2/c, a = 20.546(1) A, b = 5.6571(3) A, c = 13.0979(8) A, beta = 94.416(1) degrees, Z = 4.