Tin(II) Halide Insertion or Halogen Exchange in the Reactions of Dihaloplatinum(II) Complexes with Tin(II) Halide

Reactions of SnCl₂ with the complexes cis‐[PtCl₂(P₂)] (P₂=dppf (1,1′‐bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene), dppp (1,3‐bis(diphenylphosphino)propane=1,1′‐(propane‐1,3‐diyl)bis[1,1‐diphenylphosphine]), dppb (1,4‐bis(diphenylphosphino)butane=1,1′‐(butane‐1,4‐diyl)bis[1,1‐diphenylphosphine]), and dpppe (1,5‐bis(diphenylphosphino)pentane=1,1′‐(pentane‐1,5‐diyl)bis[1,1‐diphenylphosphine])) resulted in the insertion of SnCl₂ into the Pt? Cl bond to afford the cis‐[PtCl(SnCl₃)(P₂)] complexes. However, the reaction of the complexes cis‐[PtCl₂(P₂)] (P₂=dppf, dppm (bis(diphenylphosphino)methane=1,1′‐methylenebis[1,1‐diphenylphosphine]), dppe (1,2‐bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane=1,1′‐(ethane‐1,2‐diyl)bis[1,1‐diphenylphosphine]), dppp, dppb, and dpppe; P=Ph₃P and (MeO)₃P) with SnX₂ (X=Br or I) resulted in the halogen exchange to yield the complexes [PtX₂(P₂)]. In contrast, treatment of cis‐[PtBr₂(dppm)] with SnBr₂ resulted in the insertion of SnBr₂ into the Pt? Br bond to form cis‐[Pt(SnBr₃)₂(dppm)], and this product was in equilibrium with the starting complex cis‐[PtBr₂(dppm)]. Moreover, the reaction of cis‐[PtCl₂(dppb)] with a mixture SnCl₂/SnI₂ in a 2 : 1 mol ratio resulted in the formation of cis‐[PtI₂(dppb)] as a consequence of the selective halogen‐exchange reaction. ³¹P‐NMR Data for all complexes are reported, and a correlation between the chemical shifts and the coupling constants was established for mono‐ and bis(trichlorostannyl)platinum complexes. The effect of the alkane chain length of the ligand and Sn^II halide is described.     

N‐(2‐Hydroxyethyl)‐N‐methyldithiocarbamato Complexes of Nickel(II) with Phosphorus Donor Ligands

Planar nickel(II) complexes involving N‐(2‐Hydroxyethyl)‐N‐methyldithiocarbamate, such as [NiX(nmedtc)(PPh₃)] (X = Cl, NCS; PPh₃ = triphenylphosphine), and [Ni(nmedtc)(P‐P)]ClO₄(P‐P = 1,1‐bis(diphenylphosphino)methane(dppm); 1,3‐bis(diphenylphosphino)propane (1,3‐dppp); 1,4‐bis(diphenylphosphino)butane(1,4‐dppb) have been synthesized. The complexes have been characterized by elemental analyses, IR and electronic spectroscopies. The increased νC–N value in all the complexes is due to the mesomeric drift of electrons from the dithiocarbamate ligands to the metal atom. Single crystal X‐ray structure of [Ni(nmedtc)(1,3‐dppp)]ClO₄·H₂O is reported. In the present 1,3‐dppp chelate, the P–Ni–P angle is higher than that found in 1,2‐bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane‐nickel chelates and lower than 1,4‐bis(diphenylphosphino)butane‐nickel chelates, as a result of presence of the flexible propyl back bone connecting the two phosphorus atoms of the complex.     

Pincer and diamine Ru and Os diphosphane complexes as efficient catalysts for the dehydrogenation of alcohols to ketones

The ruthenium and osmium complexes [MCl₂(diphosphane)(L)] (M=Ru, Os; L=bidentate amino ligand) and [MCl(CNN)(dppb)] (CNN=pincer ligand; dppb=1,4‐bis‐ (diphenylphosphino)butane), containing the N–H moiety, have been found to catalyze the acceptorless dehydrogenation of alcohols in tBuOH and in the presence of KOtBu. The compounds trans‐[MCl₂(dppf)(en)] (M=Ru 7 , Os 13 ; dppf=1,1′‐bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene; en=ethylenediamine) display very high activity and different substrates, including cyclic and linear alcohols, are efficiently oxidized to ketones by using 0.8–0.04 mol % of catalyst. The effect of the base and the comparison of the catalytic activity of the Ru versus Os complexes are reported. The ruthenium complex 7 generally leads to a faster conversion into ketones with respect to the osmium complex 13 , which displays better activity in the dehydrogenation of 5‐en‐3β‐hydroxy steroids. The synthesis of new Ru and Os complexes [MCl₂(PP)(L)] (PP=dppb, dppf; L=(±)‐trans‐1,2‐diaminocyclohexane, 2‐(aminomethyl)pyridine, and 2‐aminoethanol) of trans and cis configuration is also reported.     

Hexanuclear Gold(I) Phosphide Complexes as Platforms for Multiple Redox‐Active Ferrocenyl Units

The synthesis, X‐ray crystal structures, electrochemical, and spectroscopic studies of a series of hexanuclear gold(I) μ₃‐ferrocenylmethylphosphido complexes stabilized by bridging phosphine ligands, [Au₆(P?P)_n(Fc‐CH₂‐P)₂][PF₆]₂ (n=3, P?P=dppm (bis(diphenylphosphino)methane) ( 1 ), dppe (1,2‐bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane) ( 2 ), dppp (1,3‐bis(diphenylphosphino)propane) ( 3 ), Ph₂PN(C₃H₇)‐PPh₂ ( 4 ), Ph₂PN(Ph‐CH₃‐p)PPh₂ ( 5 ), dppf (1,1′‐bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene) ( 6 ); n=2, P?P=dpepp (bis(2‐diphenylphosphinoethyl)phenylphosphine) ( 7 )), as platforms for multiple redox‐active ferrocenyl units, are reported. The investigation of the structural changes of the clusters has been probed by introducing different bridging phosphine ligands. This class of gold(I) μ₃‐ferrocenylmethylphosphido complexes has been found to exhibit one reversible oxidation couple, suggestive of the absence of electronic communication between the ferrocene units through the Au₆P₂ cluster core, providing an understanding of the electronic properties of the hexanuclear Au^I cluster linkage. The present complexes also serve as an ideal system for the design of multi‐electron reservoir and molecular battery systems.     

Bis(alkoxycarbonyl) complexes of platinum: preparation,reactivity and their role in carbonylation reactions

bis(alkoxycarbonyl) complexes of platinum of the type [Pt(COOR)₂L] [L = 1,2-bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane (dppe), 1,3-bis(diphenylphosphino)propane (dppp), l,4-bis(diphenylphosphino)butane (dppb), 1,1'-bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene (dppf) or 1,2-bis-(diphenylphosphino)benzene (dpb); R = CH₃, C₆H₅ or C₂H₅] were obtained by reaction of [PtCl₂L] with carbon monoxide and alkoxides. Palladium and nickel complexes gave only carbonyl complexes of the type [M(CO)L] or [M(CO)₂L]. The new complexes were characterized by chemical and spectroscopic means. The X-ray structure of [Pt(COOCH₃)₂(dppf] · CH₃OH is also reported. The reactivity of some alkoxycarbonyl complexes was also investigated.     

Regioselective cyclotrimerization of phenylacetylenes to 1,2,4-triarylbenzenes catalyzed by iridium-diphosphine complexes

The organoiridium derivatives HIr(cod)(P-P) (cod=1,5-cyclooctadiene; P-P=dppm (bis(diphenylphosphino)methane), dppe (1,2-bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane), dppp (1,3-bis(diphenylphosphino)propane), dppb (1,4-bis(diphenylphosphino)butane)) catalyze the regioselective cyclotrimerization of phenylacetylene as well as of its derivatives p-CH₃OC₆H₄CCH and p-CF₃C₆H₄CCH. The catalytic activity of the precursors as well as the selectivity towards formation of the 1,2,4-triarylbenzenes (up to 100%) are influenced by the diphosphine, and both increase by decreasing the size of the phosphine-iridium chelate ring.     

Synthesis,Characterization, and X‐ray Crystal Structures of (Diphosphine)Ni(dmit) and (Diphosphine)Ni(dmio) (Diphosphine = dppv,dppb) Complexes

Four complexes with the ligands dmit and dmio were synthesized. Reaction of (PhCO)₂(dmit) and (PhCO)₂(dmio) with MeONa afforded the intermediates 2‐thioxo‐1,3‐dithiole‐4,5‐dithiolate dianion and 2‐oxo‐1,3‐dithiole‐4,5‐dithiolate dianion, respectively. Reaction of the two dianions with (diphosphine)NiCl₂ [diphosphine = (Z)‐1, 2‐bis(diphenylphosphanyl)ethane (dppv), 1,2‐bis(diphenylphosphanyl)benzene (dppb)] gave (dppv)Ni(dmit) ( 1 ), (dppb)Ni(dmit) ( 2 ), (dppv)Ni(dmio) ( 3 ), and (dppb)Ni(dmio) ( 4 ). This synthesis route was found to be an efficient pathway to prepare dmit and dmio ligand complexes. Complexes, 1 – 4 were fully characterized by elemental analysis and IR, ¹H NMR, ¹³C NMR, and ³¹P NMR spectroscopy. In addition, the molecular structures of 1 , 3 and 4 were established by X‐ray diffraction.     

Metal Derivatives of Heterocyclic‐2‐thiones: Crystal Structures of [Bis(diphenylphosphanyl)propane][bis(pyrimidine‐2‐thiolato)]ruthenium(II) and [Bis(diphenylphosphanyl)methane][bis(pyridine‐2‐thiolato)]ruthenium(II)

Ruthenium(II) Complexes containing pyrimidine‐2‐thiolate (pymS^–) and bis(diphenylphosphanyl)alkanes [Ph₂P–(CH₂)_m–PPh₂, m = 1, dppm; m = 2, dppe; m = 3, dppp; m = 4, dppb] are described. Reactions of [RuCl₂L₂] (L = dppm, dppp) and [Ru₂Cl₄L₃] (L = dppb) with pyrimidine‐2‐thione (pymSH) in 1:2 molar ratio in dry benzene in the presence of Et₃N base yielded the [Ru(pymS)₂L] complexes (pymS^– = pyrimidine‐2‐thiolate; L = dppm ( 1 ); dppp ( 3 ); dppb ( 4 )). The complex [Ru(pymS)₂(dppe)] ( 2 ) was indirectly prepared by the reaction of [Ru(pymS)₂(PPh₃)₂] with dppe. These complexes were characterized using analytical data, IR, ¹H, ¹³C, ³¹P NMR spectroscopy, and X‐ray crystallography (complex 3 ). The crystal structure of the analogous complex [Ru(pyS)₂(dppm)] ( 5 ) with the ligand pyridine‐2‐thiolate (pyS^–) was also described. X‐ray crystallographic investigation of complex 3 has shown two four‐membered chelate rings (N, S donors) and one six‐membered ring (P, P donors) around the metal atom. Compound 5 provides the first example in which Ru^II has three four‐membered chelate rings: two made up by N, S donor ligands and one made up by P, P donor ligand. The arrangement around the metal atoms in each complex is distorted octahedral with cis:cis:trans:P, P:N, N:S, S dispositions of the donor atoms. The ³¹P NMR spectroscopic data revealed that the complexes are static in solution, except 2 , which showed the presence of more than one species.     

The Synthesis by Decarboxylation Reactions and Crystal Structures of 1, n–Bis(diphenylphosphino)alkane(pentafluorophenyl)‐platinum(II) Complexes

Decarboxylation reactions between the complexes cis–[PtCl₂L] (L = 1, n–bis(diphenylphosphino)–ethane (n = 2, dppe), –propane (n = 3, dppp) or –butane (n = 4, dppb)) and thallium(I) pentafluorobenzoate in pyridine give cis–[PtCl(C₆F₅)L] and cis–[Pt(C₆F₅)₂L] complexes in high yields with short reaction times. X–ray crystal structures of cis–[PtCl(C₆F₅)(dppe)] · 0.5 C₅H₅N, cis–[PtCl(C₆F₅)(dppp)], cis–[PtCl(C₆F₅)(dppb)] · C₃H₆O, cis–[Pt(C₆F₅)₂L] (L = dppe, dppp and dppb) and the reactants cis–[PtCl₂(dppp)] (as a CH₂Cl₂ solvate) and cis–[PtCl₂(dppb)] show monomeric structures with chelating diphosphine ligands in all cases rather than dimers with bridging diphosphines. ³¹P NMR data are consistent with these structures in solution.     

Driving forces in substitution reactions of octahedral complexes: The influence of the competitive effect

The reaction of cis-[RuCl₂(P–P)(N–N)] type complexes (P–P = 1,4-bis(diphenylphosphino)butane or (1,1′-diphenylphosphino)ferrocene; N–N = 2,2′-bipyridine or 1,10-phenantroline) with monodentate ligands (L), such as 4-methylpyridine, 4-phenylpyridine and benzonitrile forms [RuCl(L)(P–P)(N–N)]⁺ species. Upon characterization of the isolated compounds by elemental analysis, ³¹P{¹H} NMR and X-ray crystallography it was found out that the type of the L ligand determines its position in relation to the phosphorus atom. While pyridine derivatives like 4-methylpyridine and 4-phenylpyridine coordinate trans to the phosphorus atom, the benzonitrile ligand (bzCN), a good π acceptor, coordinates trans to the nitrogen atom. A ³¹P{¹H} NMR experiment following the reaction of the precursor cis-[RuCl₂(dppb)(phen)] with the benzonitrile ligand shows that the final position of the entering ligand in the complex is better defined as a consequence of the competitive effect between the phosphorus atom and the cyano-group from the benzonitrile moiety and not by the trans effect. In this case, the benzonitrile group is stabilized trans to one of the nitrogen atoms of the N–N ligand. A differential pulse voltammetry experiment confirms this statement. In both experiments the [RuCl(bzCN)(dppb)(phen)]PF₆ species with the bzCN ligand positioned trans to a phosphorus atom of the dppb ligand was detected as an intermediate complex.     

[1,3‐Bis(di­phenyl­phosphino)prop­ane]­tri­chloro­oxorhenium(V)

Tri­chloro­oxo­[1,3‐prop­ane­diyl­bis­(di­phenyl­phosphine)‐P,P′]rhen­ium(V), [Re­Cl₃­O­(C₂₇­H₂₆P₂)], crystallizes with four formula units per unit cell. The crystal structure consists of neutral complexes of [ReOCl₃(dppp)] [dppp is 1,3‐bis(diphenylphosphino)propane] packed by H?π‐ring interactions. The Re atom is octahedrally coordinated to the oxo anion, three Cl atoms and two P atoms from the dppp ligand. The six‐membered ring formed by the bidentate dppp ligand and the rhenium metal centre is in a chair conformation. The title compound is an intermediate in the synthesis of bis(dppp) complexes of rhenium.     

Chiral and Nonchiral [OsX2(diphosphane)(diamine)] (X: Cl,OCH2CF3) Complexes for Fast Hydrogenation of Carbonyl Compounds

The osmium complexes trans‐[OsCl₂(dppf)(diamine)] (dppf: 1,1′‐bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene; diamine: ethylenediamine in 3 , propylenediamine in 4 ) were prepared by the reaction of [OsCl₂(PPh₃)₃] ( 1 ) with the ferrocenyl diphosphane, dppf and the corresponding diamine in dichloromethane. The reaction of derivative 3 with NaOCH₂CF₃ in toluene afforded the alkoxide cis‐[Os(OCH₂CF₃)₂(dppf)(ethylenediamine)] ( 5 ). The novel precursor [Os₂Cl₄(P(m‐tolyl)₃)₅] ( 2 ) allows the synthesis of the chiral complexes trans‐[OsCl₂(diphosphane)(1,2‐diamine)] ( 6 – 9 ; diphosphane: (R)‐[6,6′‐dimethoxy(1,1′‐biphenyl)‐2,2′‐diyl]bis[1,1‐bis(3,5‐dimethylphenyl)phosphane] (xylMeObiphep) or (R)‐(1,1′‐binaphthalene)‐2,2′‐diylbis[1,1‐bis(3,5‐dimethylphenyl)phosphane] (xylbinap); diamine=(R,R)‐1,2‐diphenylethylenediamine (dpen) or (R,R)‐1,2‐diaminocyclohexane (dach)), obtained by the treatment of 2 with the diphosphane and the 1,2‐diamine in toluene at reflux temperature. Compounds 3 – 5 in ethanol and in the presence of NaOEt catalyze the reduction of methyl aryl, dialkyl, and diaryl ketones and aldehydes with H₂ at low pressure (5 atm), with substrate/catalyst (S/C) ratios of 10 000–200 000 and achieving turnover frequencies (TOFs) of up to 3.0×10⁵ h^?1 at 70 °C. By employment of the chiral compounds 6 – 9 , different ketones, including alkyl aryl, bulky tert‐butyl, and cyclic ketones, have successfully been hydrogenated with enantioselectivities up to 99 % and with S/C ratios of 5000–100 000 and TOFs of up to 4.1×10⁴ h^?1 at 60 °C.     

X‐Ray Photoelectron Spectral Studies on Planar NiS4 and NiS2P2 Chromophores. Single Crystal X‐Ray Structural Study on [1, 4‐Bis(diphenylphosphino‐k,P, P')butane](piperidinecarbodithioato‐S,S')‐Nickel(II) Perchlorate

X‐ray photoelectron spectral study was made on the complexes Ni(nmedtc)₂( 1 ), [Ni(nmedtc)(PPh₃)₂]ClO₄( 2 ), [Ni‐(nmedtc)(dppe)]BPh₄( 3 ) (where nmedtc = N‐methyl, N‐ethanoldithiocarbamate, dppe = 1, 2‐bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane). The nickel 2p_3/2 binding energy values for chelated and free phosphine complexes are 854.0 and 854.1 eV which are significantly different from Ni2p_3/2 BE value of NiS₄ chromophore, indicating the relative dearth of electron density on Ni in NiS₂P₂ chromophores. The presence of two phosphine groups in NiS₂P₂ chromophore alleviates the electron density on the metal atom. More electron density is being pulled away from the metal atom in chelates than in the PPh₃ analogue. This observation is in line with solution studies by cyclic voltammetry. A one‐electron reduction potential was observed to be the minimum for NiS₂P₂ chromophores compared to the others. Also the crystal structure of the complex [Ni(pipdtc)(1, 4‐dppb)]ClO₄ (pipdtc^‐ = piperidinecarbodithioato anion, 1, 4‐dppb = bis(diphenylphosphino)butane) prepared by the reaction between Ni(pipdtc)₂, NiCl₂�6₂2O, and 1, 4‐dppb in CH₃CN‐CH₃OH is reported.     

Synthesis and characterization of new HgS nanoparticles prepared by Hg(II)-triazole-3-thiol as precursor

Nine Hg(II) complexes, [Hg(DiphtS)₂(L-L)](2–7) {where, HDiphtS = 4,5-diphenyl-1,2,4-triazole-3-thiol; L-L = bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane (dppe) (2); 1,3-bis(diphenylphosphino)propane (dppp)(3); 1,4-bis(diphenylphosphino)butane (dppb)(4); 1,1′-bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene (dppf)(5); 2,2′-bipyridine (Bipy)(6) and 1,10-phenanthroline (Phen)(7) } or [Hg(DiphtS)₂(L)₂] (8–9) {where L = triphenylphosphine (Ph₃P) (8) and triphenylphosphine sulphide (Ph₃PS) (9)}, have been prepared form the reaction of [Hg(DiphtS)₂](1) with phosphine or amine as co-ligands. Then characterized by the IR, NMR (¹H and ³¹P) spectroscopy, elemental analysis, molar conductivity. The results supported the monodentate behaviour of HDiphtS ligand in all complexes (1–9) in anion form through the sulfur atom. Complexes 1, 2 and 6 have been used as single source precursors for the preparation of ethylene-diamine capped HgS-nanoparticles. Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), have been used to characterize the HgS nanoparticles.     

Multimetallic complexes of group 10 and 11 metals based on polydentate dithiocarbamate ligands

The ligands KS(2)CN(Bz)CH(2)CH(2)N(Bz)CS(2)K (K(2)L(1)), N(CH(2)CH(2)N(Me)CS(2)Na)(3) (Na(3)L(2)), and the new chelates {(CH(2)CH(2))NCS(2)Na}(3) (Na(3)L(3)) and {CH(2)CH(2)N(CS(2)Na)CH(2)CH(2)CH(2)NCS(2)Na}(2) (Na(4)L(4)), react with the gold(I) complexes [ClAu(PR(3))] (R = Me, Ph, Cy) and [ClAu(IDip)] to yield di-, tri-and tetragold compounds. Larger metal units can also be coordinated by the longer, flexible linker, K(2)L(1). Thus two equivalents of cis-[PtCl(2)(PEt(3))(2)] react with K(2)L(1) in the presence of NH(4)PF(6) to yield the bimetallic complex [L(1){Pt(PEt(3))(2)}(2)](PF(6))(2). The compounds [NiCl(2)(dppp)] and [MCl(2)(dppf)] (M = Ni, Pd, Pt; dppp = 1,3-bis(diphenylphosphino)propane, dppf = 1,1'-bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene) also yield the dications, [L(1){Ni(dppp)}(2)](2+) and [L(1){Ni(dppf)}(2)](2+) in an analogous fashion. In the same manner, reaction between [(L'(2))(AuCl)(2)] (L'(2) = dppm, dppf; dppm = bis(diphenylphosphino)methane) and KS(2)CN(Bz)CH(2)CH(2)N(Bz)CS(2)K yield [L(1){Au(2)(L'(2))}(2)]. The molecular structures of [L(1){M(dppf)}(2)](PF(6))(2) (M = Ni, Pd) and [L(1){Au(PR(3))}(2)] (R = Me, Ph) are reported.     

Synthese und Strukturen neuer selenido‐ und selenolatoverbrückter Kupfercluster: [Cu38Se13(SePh)12(dppb)6] (1), [Cu(dppp)2][Cu25Se4(SePh)18(dppp)2] (2), [Cu36Se5(SePh)26(dppa)4] (3), [Cu58Se16(SePh)24(dppa)6] (4) und [Cu3(SeMes)3(dppm)] (5)

Syntheses and Crystal Structures of new Selenido‐ and Selenolato‐bridged Copper Clusters: [Cu₃₈Se₁₃(SePh)₁₂(dppb)₆] (1), [Cu(dppp)₂][Cu₂₅Se₄(SePh)₁₈(dppp)₂] (2), [Cu₃₆Se₅(SePh)₂₆(dppa)₄] (3), [Cu₅₈Se₁₆(SePh)₂₄(dppa)₆] (4), and [Cu₃(SeMes)₃(dppm)] (5) The reactions of copper(I) chloride or copper(I) acetate with monodentate phosphine ligands (PR₃; R = organic group) and Se(SiMe₃)₂ have already lead to the formation of CuSe clusters with up to 146 copper and 73 selenium atoms. If the starting materials and the bidentate phosphine ligands (Ph₂P–(CH₂)_n–PPh₂, n = 1: dppm, n = 3: dppp, n = 4: dppb; Ph₂P–C≡C–PPh₂: dppa) and silylated chalcogen derivates are changed (RSeSiMe₃; R = Ph, Mes) a series of new CuSe clusters can be synthesized. From single crystal X‐ray structure analysis one can characterise [Cu₃₈Se₁₃(SePh)₁₂(dppb)₆] ( 1 ), [Cu(dppp)₂] · [Cu₂₅Se₄(SePh)₁₈(dppp)₂] ( 2 ), [Cu₃₆Se₅(SePh)₂₆(dppa)₄] ( 3 ), [Cu₅₈Se₁₆(SePh)₂₄(dppa)₆] ( 4 ) and [Cu₃(SeMes)₃(dppm)] ( 5 ). In this new class of CuSe clusters, compounds 1 and 4 possess a spherical cluster skeleton, wheras 2 and 3 have a layered cluster core.     

Preparation and solid-state characterization of mixed-ligand coordination/organometallic oligomers and polymers of copper(I) and silver(I) using diphosphine and mono- and diisocyanide ligands

The dimers [Cu(2)(dppm)(2)(CN-t-Bu)(3)](BF(4))(2) and [Ag(2)(dppm)(2)(CN-t-Bu)(2)](X)(2) (X(-) = BF(4)(-), ClO(4)(-)) and the coordination polymers [[M(diphos)(CN-t-Bu)(2)]BF(4)](n) (M = Cu, Ag; diphos = bis(diphenylphosphino)butane (dppb), bis(diphenylphosphino)pentane (dpppen), bis(diphenylphosphino)hexane (dpph)), [[Ag(2)(dppb)(3)(CN-t-Bu)(2)](BF(4))(2)](n), and [[Ag(dpppen)(CN-t-Bu)]BF(4)](n) have been synthesized and fully characterized as model materials for the mixed bridging ligand polymers which exhibit the general formula [[M(diphos)(dmb)]BF(4)](n) (M = Cu, Ag; dmb = 1,8-diisocyano-p-menthane) and [[Ag(dppm)(dmb)]ClO(4)](n). The identity of four polymers ([[Ag(dppb)(CN-t-Bu)(x)]BF(4)](n) (x = 1, 2), [[Ag(2)(dppb)(3)(CN-t-Bu)(2)](BF(4))(2)](n), [[Ag(dppm)(dmb)]ClO(4)](n)) and the two dimers has been confirmed by X-ray crystallography. The structure of [[Ag(dppm)(dmb)]ClO(4)](n) exhibits an unprecedented 1-D chain of the type "[Ag(dmb)(2)Ag(dppm)(2)(2+)](n)", where d(Ag(.)Ag) values between tetrahedral Ag atoms are 4.028(1) and 9.609(1) A for the dppm and dmb bridged units, respectively. The [[Ag(dppb)(CN-t-Bu)(x)]BF(4)](n) polymers (x = 1, 2) form zigzag chains in which the Ag atoms are tri- and tetracoordinated, respectively. The [[Ag(2)(dppb)(3)(CN-t-Bu)(2)](BF(4))(2)](n) polymer, which is produced from the rearrangement of [[Ag(dppb)(CN-t-Bu)(2)]BF(4)](n), forms a 2-D structure described as a "honeycomb" pattern, where large [Ag(dppb)(+)](6) macrocycles each hosting two counterions and two acetonitrile guest molecules are observed. Properties such as glass transition temperature, morphology, thermal decomposition, and luminescence in the solid state at 293 K are reported. The luminescence bands exhibit maxima between 475 and 500 nm with emission lifetimes ranging between 6 and 55 micros. These emissions are assigned to a metal-to-ligand charge transfer (MLCT) of the type M(I) --> pi(NC)/pi(PPh(2)).     

Sterically‐Directed Consecutive and Size‐Selective Self‐Assembly of Palladium Diphosphane Complexes with an Ar‐BIAN Ligand: Unexpected Formation of Pentameric and Hexameric Aggregates

The coordination properties of N,N′‐bis[4‐(4‐pyridyl)phenyl]acenaphthenequinonediimine (L¹) and N,N′‐bis[4‐(2‐pyridyl)phenyl]acenaphthenequinonediimine (L²) were investigated in self‐assembly with palladium diphosphane complexes [Pd(P^P)(H₂O)₂](OTf)₂ (OTf=triflate) by using various analytical techniques, including multinuclear (¹H, ¹⁵N, and ³¹P) NMR spectroscopy and mass spectrometry (P^P=dppp, dppf, dppe; dppp=bis(diphenylphosphanyl)propane, dppf= bis(diphenylphosphanyl)ferrocene, and dppe=bis(diphenylphosphanyl)ethane). Beside the expected trimeric and tetrameric species, the interaction of an equimolar mixture of [Pd(dppp)]²⁺ ions and L¹ also generates pentameric aggregates. Due to the E/Z isomerism of L¹, a dimeric product was also observed. In all of these species, which correspond to the general formula [Pd(dppp)L¹]_n(OTf)_2n (n=2–5), the L¹ ligand is coordinated to the Pd center only through the terminal pyridyl groups. Introduction of a second equivalent of the [Pd(dppp)]²⁺ tecton results in coordination to the internal, sterically more encumbered chelating site and induces enhancement of the higher nuclearity components. The presence of higher‐order aggregates (n=5, 6), which were unexpected for the interaction of cis‐protected palladium corners with linear ditopic bridging ligands, has been demonstrated both by mass‐spectrometric and DOSY NMR spectroscopic analysis. The sequential coordination of the [Pd(dppp)]²⁺ ion is attributed to the dissimilar steric properties of the two coordination sites. In the self‐assembled species formed in a 1:1:1 mixture of [Pd(dppp)]²⁺/[Pd(dppe)]²⁺/L¹, the sterically more demanding [Pd(dppp)]²⁺ tectons are attached selectively to the pyridyl groups, whereas the more hindered imino nitrogen atoms coordinate the less bulky dppe complexes, thus resulting in a sterically directed, size‐selective sorting of the metal tectons. The propensity of the new ligands to incorporate hydrogen‐bonded solvent molecules at the chelating site was confirmed by X‐ray diffraction studies.     

Combining Topological and Steric Constraints for the Preparation of Heteroleptic Copper(I) Complexes

Heteroleptic copper(I) complexes have been prepared from a macrocyclic ligand incorporating a 2,9‐diphenyl‐1,10‐phenanthroline subunit ( M30 ) and two bis‐phosphines, namely bis[(2‐diphenylphosphino)phenyl] ether (POP) and 1,3‐bis(diphenylphosphino)propane (dppp). In both cases, the diphenylphosphino moieties of the PP ligand are too bulky to pass through the 30‐membered ring of M30 during the coordination process, hence the formation of C_2v‐symmetrical pseudo‐rotaxanes is prevented. When POP is used, X‐ray crystal structure analysis shows the formation of a highly distorted [Cu( M30 )(POP)]⁺ complex in which the POP ligand is only partially threaded through the M30 unit. This compound is poorly stable as the Cu^I cation is not in a favorable coordination environment due to steric constraints. By contrast, in the case of dppp, the bis‐phosphine ligand undergoes both steric and topological constraints and adopts a nonchelating coordination mode to generate [Cu₂( M30 )₂(μ‐dppp)](BF₄)₂. This compound exhibits metal‐to‐ligand charge transfer (MLCT) emission characterized by a very large Stokes’ shift (≈200 nm) that is not attributed to a dramatic structural distortion between the ground and the emitting states but to very weak MLCT absorption transitions at longer wavelengths. Accordingly, [Cu₂( M30 )₂(μ‐dppp)](BF₄)₂ shows unusually high luminescence quantum yields for Cu^I complexes, both in solution and in the solid state (0.5 and 7 %, respectively).     

Ab initio and DFT study of the electronic structures and spectroscopic properties of pyrene ligands and their cyclometalated complexes

Two ligands 1‐diphenylphosphinopyrene (1‐PyP) ( L ₁ ), 1,6‐bis(diphenylphosphino)‐pyrene (1,6‐PyP) ( L ₂ ) and their cyclometalated complexes [Pt(dppm)(1‐PyP‐H)]⁺ ( 1 ), [Pt₂(dppm)₂(1,6‐PyP‐H₂)]²⁺ (dppm = bis(diphenylphosphino)methane ( 2 ), and [Pd(dppe)(1‐PyP‐H)⁺ (dppe = bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane) ( 3 ) are investigated theoretically to explore their electronic structures and spectroscopic properties. The ground‐ and excited‐state structures are optimized by the density functional theory (DFT) and single‐excitation configuration interaction method, respectively. At the time‐dependent DFT (TDDFT) and B3LYP level, the absorption and emission spectra in solution are obtained. As revealed from the calculations, the lowest‐energy absorptions of 1 and 3 are attributed to the mixing ligand‐to‐metal charge transfer (CT)/intraligand (IL)/ligand‐to‐ligand CT transitions, while that of 2 is attributed to the IL transition. The lowest‐energy phosphorescent emissions of the cyclometalated complexes are attributed to coming from the ³ILCT transitions. With the increase of the spin‐orbit coupling effect, the phosphorescence intensities and the emissions wavelength are correspondingly increased. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem, 2011