From the Lithium‐2‐anilide‐2‐fluoro‐1,3‐diaza‐2‐sila‐cyclopentene‐GaCl3 Adduct to 1,4,6‐Triaza‐5‐gallium‐7‐sila‐cyclo‐3‐heptene ‐ Experimental and Quantum‐chemical Results

The lithium salt (HC–NCMe₃)₂SiFNLiR ( 1 ) R = C₆H₃(2,6‐CHMe₂)₂ reacts with trichlorogallium under displacement of the lithium ion by GaCl₃ to give the adduct [(HC–NCMe₃)₂SiFN]^– [(GaCl₃)R·Li(thf)₄]⁺ ( 1 ). Compound 1 thermally loses LiCl and forms the bicyclic ring intermediates V and VI . Compound  VI adds the aniline H₂NC₆H₃(2,6‐CHMe₂)₂ and the unsaturated, seven‐membered ring compound –NCMe₃–CH₂–CH=NCMe₃GaCl₂–NR–SiFNHR– ( 2 ) is obtained. The addition is accompanied by an enamine‐imine‐tautomerism and proves the Lewis acid character of the silicon atom in an unknown 3‐center‐2‐electron interaction of one nitrogen atom with the silicon and gallium atoms. Quantum chemical calculations of the thermal isomerisation process and crystal structures of 1 and 2 are reported.     

2,2‐Difluor‐1,3‐diaza‐2‐sila‐cyclopenten – Synthese und Reaktionen

2,2‐Difluor‐1,3‐diaza‐2‐sila‐cyclopentene – Synthesis and Reactions N,N′‐Di‐tert‐butyl‐1,4‐diaza‐1,3‐butadiene reacts with elemental lithium under reduction to give a dilithium salt, which forms with fluorosilanes the diazasilacyclopentenes 1 – 4 ; (HCNCMe₃)₂SiFR, R = F ( 1 ), Me ( 2 ), Me₃C ( 3 ), N(CMe₃)SiMe₃ ( 4 ). As by‐product in the synthesis of 1 , the tert‐butyl‐amino‐methylene‐tert‐butyliminomethine substituted compound 5 was isolated, R = N(CMe₃)‐CH₂‐CH = NCMe₃. 5 is formed in the reaction of 1 with the monolithium salt of the 1,4‐diaza‐1,3‐butadiene in an enamine‐imine‐tautomerism. 1 reacts with lithium amides to give (HCNCMe₃)₂SiFNHR, 6 – 12 , R = H ( 6 ), Me ( 7 ), Me₂CH ( 8 ), Me₃C ( 9 ), H₅C₆ ( 10 ), 2,6‐Me₂C₆H₃ ( 11 ), 2,6‐(Me₂CH)₂C₆H₃ ( 12 ). The reaction of 12 with LiNH‐2.6‐(Me₂CH)₂C₆H₃ leads to the formation of (HCNCMe₃)₂Si(NHR)₂, ( 13 ). In the presence of n‐BuLi, 12 forms a lithium salt which looses LiF in boiling toluene. Lithiated 12 adds this LiF and generates a spirocyclic tetramer with a central eight‐membered LiF‐ring ( 14 ), [(HCNCMe₃)₂Si(FLiFLiNR)]₄, R = 2,6‐(Me₂CH)₂C₆H₃. ClSiMe₃ reacts with lithiated 12 to yield the substitution product (HCNCMe₃)₂SiFN(SiMe₃) R, ( 15 ). The crystal structures of 1 , 5 , 6 , 9 , 11 , 13 , 14 are reported.     

Aluminiumhydrazide. Bildung eines dimeren Di(tert‐butyl)aluminiumhydrazids mit viergliedrigem Al2N2‐Heterozyklus und Umsetzung eines Dialkylaluminiumchlorids mit Dilithium‐bis(trimethylsilyl)hydrazid

Aluminium Hydrazides – Formation of a Dimeric Di( tert ‐butyl)aluminium Hydrazide Containing a Four‐Membered Al₂N₂ Heterocycle and Reaction of Dialkylaluminium Chloride with Dilithium Bis(trimethylsilyl)hydrazide The reaction of di(tert‐butyl)aluminium chloride with tert‐butylhydrazine yielded an adduct ( 1 ) which was isolated in a pure form and characterized by crystal structure determination. 1 reacted with n‐butyllithium by deprotonation and salt elimination to give the corresponding di(tert‐butyl)aluminium hydrazide ( 2 ), which is a dimer in solution and in the solid state and possesses a four‐membered Al₂N₂ heterocycle with two exocyclic N–N bonds. The structure of 2 differs from that of other di(tert‐butyl)aluminium hydrazides which have four‐ or five‐membered heterocycles. Treatment of impure samples of 1 with n‐butyllithium yielded by the cleavage of the N–N bonds a mixture of several unknown products, from which the dimeric, centrosymmetric aluminium amide [(Me₃C)₂AlN(H)CMe₃]₂ ( 3 ) was isolated. A similar product ( 4 ) was obtained in a low yield by the reaction of (Me₃SiCH₂)₂AlCl with the dilithium hydrazide Li₂N₂(SiMe₃)₂. An intact N–N bond was neither found in the second product isolated from this reaction. Instead a tricyclic compound was formed by C–H activation which has two five‐membered AlNSiC₂ heterocycles bridged by Al–N bonds.     

1,4‐Di(isopropyl)‐1,4‐diazabutadien als Abfangreagenz für monomere Bruchstücke des Tetragalliumclusters Ga4[C(SiMe3)3]4 – Bildung eines ungesättigten GaN2C2‐Heterocyclus und eines Oxidationsprodukts mit Ga‐O‐O‐Ga‐Gruppe

1,4‐Di(isopropyl)‐1,4‐diazabutadiene as a Reagent for the Trapping of Monomeric Fragments of the Tetragalliumcluster Ga₄[C(SiMe₃)₃]₄ – Formation of an Unsaturated GaN₂C₂ Heterocycle and an Oxidation Product Containing a Ga‐O‐O‐Ga Group The tetrahedral tetragallium cluster Ga₄[C(SiMe₃)₃]₄ ( 1 ) dissociates upon dissolution to yield the monomeric fragments Ga‐R [R = C(SiMe₃)₃]. These monomers could be trapped now by the treatment of their solutions with 1,4‐di(isopropyl)‐1,4‐diazabutadiene. The product of the cycloaddition reaction ( 2 ) possesses a five‐membered GaN₂C₂ heterocycle with a coordinatively unsaturated gallium atom and an endocyclic C=C double bond. 2 is rather sensitive towards oxidation by traces of air. The contact with oxygen yielded a digallium peroxide [(C₂N₂iPr₂)RGa‐O‐O‐GaR(C₂N₂iPr₂)] ( 3 ) which was isolated in a very low yield only and which has a gallium atom attached to each oxygen atom of the inner peroxo group. Both chelating ligands of 3 possess an unpaired electron.     

CH Bond Activation during and after the Reactions of a Metallacyclic Amide with Silanes: Formation of a μ‐Alkylidene Hydride Complex,Its H–D Exchange,and β‐H Abstraction by a Hydride Ligand

Metallacyclic complex [(Me₂N)₃Ta(η²‐CH₂SiMe₂NSiMe₃)] ( 3 ) undergoes C?H activation in its reaction with H₃SiPh to afford a Ta/μ‐alkylidene/hydride complex, [(Me₂N)₂{(Me₃Si)₂N}Ta(μ‐H)₂(μ‐C‐η²‐CHSiMe₂NSiMe₃)Ta(NMe₂)₂] ( 4 ). Deuterium‐labeling studies with [D₃]SiPh show H–D exchange between the Ta?D ?Ta unit and all methyl groups in [(Me₂N)₂{(Me₃Si)₂N}Ta(μ‐D)₂(μ‐C‐η²‐CHSiMe₂NSiMe₃)Ta(NMe₂)₂] ([D₂]‐ 4 ) to give the partially deuterated complex [D_n]‐ 4 . In addition, 4 undergoes β‐H abstraction between a hydride and an NMe₂ ligand and forms a new complex [(Me₂N){(Me₃Si)₂N}Ta(μ‐H)(μ‐N‐η²‐C,N‐CH₂NMe)(μ‐C‐η²‐C,N‐CHSiMe₂NSiMe₃)Ta(NMe₂)₂] ( 5 ) with a cyclometalated, η²‐imine ligand. These results indicate that there are two simultaneous processes in [D_n]‐ 4 : 1) H–D exchange through σ‐bond metathesis, and 2) H?D elimination through β‐H abstraction (to give [D_n]‐ 5 ). Both 4 and 5 have been characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction studies.     

Reaktionen von Lithiumhydridosilylamiden RR′(H)Si–N(Li)R″ mit Chlortrimethylsilan in Tetrahydrofuran und unpolaren Lösungsmitteln: N‐Silylierung und/oder Cyclodisilazanbildung

Reactions of Lithium Hydridosilylamides RR′(H)Si–N(Li)R″ with Chlorotrimethylsilane in Tetrahydrofuran and Nonpolar Solvents: N‐Silylation and/or Formation of Cyclodisilazanes The lithiumhydridosilylamides RR′(H)Si–N(Li)R″ ( 2 a : R = R′ = CHMe₂, R″ = SiMe₃; 2 b : R = R′ = Ph, R″ = SiMe₃; 2 c : R = R′ = CMe₃, R″ = SiMe₃; 2 d : R = R′ = R″ = CMe₃; 2 e : R = Me, R′ = Si(SiMe₃)₃, R″ = CMe₃; 2 f – 2 h : R = R′ = Me, f : R″ = 2,4,6‐Me₃C₆H₂, g : R″ = SiH(CHMe₂)₂, h : R″ = SiH(CMe₃)₂; 2 i : R = R′ = CMe₃, R″ = SiH(CMe₃)₂) were prepared by reaction of the corresponding hydridosilylamines RR′(H)Si–NHR″ 2 a – 2 i with n‐butyllithium in equimolar ratio in n‐hexane. The unknown amines 1 e – 1 i and amides 2 f – 2 i have been characterized spectroscopically. The wave numbers of the Si–H stretching vibrations and ²⁹Si–¹H coupling constants of the amides are less than of the analogous amines. This indicates a higher hydride character for the hydrogen atom of the Si–H group in the amide in comparison to the amines. The ²⁹Si‐NMR chemical shifts lie in the amides at higher field than in the amines. The amides 2 a – 2 c and 2 e – 2 g react with chlorotrimethylsilane in THF to give the corresponding N‐silylation products RR′(H)Si–N(SiMe₃)R″ ( 3 a – 3 c , 3 e – 3 g ) in good yields. In the reaction of 2 i with chlorotrimethylsilane in molar ratio 1 : 2,33 in THF hydrogen‐chlorine exchange takes place and after hydrolytic work up of the reaction mixture [(Me₃C)₂(Cl)Si]₂NH ( 5 a ) is obtained. The reaction of the amides 2 a – 2 c , 2 f and 2 g with chlorotrimethylsilane in m(p)‐xylene and/or n‐hexane affords mixtures of N‐substitution products RR′(H)Si–N(SiMe₃)R″ ( 3 a – 3 c , 3 f , 3 g ) and cyclodisilazanes [RR′Si–NR″]₂ ( 6 a – 6 c , 6 f , 6 g ) as the main products. In case of the reaction of 2 h the cyclodisilazane 6 h was obtained only. 2 c – 2 e show a very low reactivity toward chlorotrimetyhlsilane in m‐xylene and toluene resp.. In contrast to Me₃SiCl the reactivity of 2 d toward Me₃SiOSO₂CF₃ and Me₂(H)SiCl is significant higher. 2 d react with Me₃SiOSO₂CF₃ and Me₂(H)SiCl in n‐hexane under N‐silylation to give RR′(H)Si–N(SiMe₃)R″ ( 3 d ) and RR′(H)Si–N(SiHMe₂)R″ ( 3 d ′) resp. The crystal structures of [Me₂Si–NSiMe₃]₂ ( I ) ( 6 f , 6 g and 6 h ) have been determined.     

Hydroboration of the Amino(imino)borane [Me3C(Me3Si)N]B[N(CMe3)]

The formation of four products of the type Me₃C(Me₃Si)N=BH–N(CMe₃)=BR'₂ [BR'₂ = B(CHMeiPr)₂ ( 1 ), B(c‐C₆H₁₁)₂ ( 2 ), B(C₈H₁₄) ( 3 ), B(O₂C₆H₄) ( 4 )] from the iminoborane Me₃C(Me₃Si)N–···B=···N(CMe₃) and the hydroboranes (R'₂BH)₂ is described. Crystal structure analysis reveals the molecule 1 to have an N=B–N=B backbone with two orthogonal N=B bond planes and, hence, no conjugation between the two B–N double bonds.     

Synthese und Struktur von η1‐Phosphaallyl‐, η1‐Arsaallylund η1‐Stibaallyleisen‐Komplexen [(η5‐C5Me5)(CO)2Fe–E(SiMe3)C(OSiMe3)=CPh2] (E = P,As, Sb)

Syntheses and Structures of η¹‐Phosphaallyl, η¹‐Arsaallyl, and η¹‐Stibaallyl Iron Complexes [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)(CO)₂Fe–E(SiMe₃)C(OSiMe₃)=CPh₂] (E = P, As, Sb) The reaction of equimolar amounts of [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)(CO)₂Fe–E(SiMe₃)₂] ( 1 a : E = P; 1 b : As; 1 c : Sb) and diphenylketene afforded the η¹‐phosphaallyl‐, η¹‐arsaallyl‐, and η¹‐stibaallyl complexes [(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)(CO)₂Fe–E(SiMe₃)C(OSiMe₃)=CPh₂] ( 2 a : E = P; 2 b : As; 2 c : Sb). The molecular structures of 2 b and 2 c were elucidated by single crystal X‐ray analyses.     

Darstellung,Charakterisierung und Reaktionsverhalten von Natrium‐ und Kaliumhydridosilylamiden R2(H)Si—N(M)R′ (M = Na,K) — Kristallstruktur von [(Me3C)2(H)Si—N(K)SiMe3]2·THF

Preparation, Characterization and Reaction Behaviour of Sodium and Potassium Hydridosilylamides R₂(H)Si—N(M)R′ (M = Na, K) — Crystal Structure of [(Me₃C)₂(H)Si—N(K)SiMe₃]₂ · THF The alkali metal hydridosilylamides R₂(H)Si—N(M)R′ 1a‐Na — 1d—Na and 1a‐K — 1d‐K ( a : R = Me, R′ = CMe₃; b : R = Me, R′ = SiMe₃; c : R = Me, R′ = Si(H)Me₂; d : R = CMe₃, R′= SiMe₃) have been prepared by reaction of the corresponding hydridosilylamines 1a — 1d with alkali metal M (M = Na, K) in presence of styrene or with alkali metal hydrides MH (M = Na, K). With NaNH₂ in toluene Me₂(H)Si—NHCMe₃ ( 1a ) reacted not under metalation but under nucleophilic substitution of the H(Si) atom to give Me₂(NaNH)Si—NHCMe₃ ( 5 ). In the reaction of Me₂(H)Si—NHSiMe₃ ( 1b ) with NaNH₂ intoluene a mixture of Me₂(NaNH)Si—NHSiMe₃ and Me₂(H)Si—N(Na)SiMe₃ ( 1b‐Na ) was obtained. The hydridosilylamides have been characterized spectroscopically. The spectroscopic data of these amides and of the corresponding lithium derivatives are discussed. The ²⁹Si‐NMR‐chemical shifts and the ²⁹Si—¹H coupling constants of homologous alkali metal hydridosilylamides R₂(H)Si—N(M)R′ (M = Li, Na, K) are depending on the alkali metal. With increasing of the ionic character of the M—N bond M = K > Na > Li the ²⁹Si‐NMR‐signals are shifted upfield and the ²⁹Si—¹H coupling constants except for compounds (Me₃C)(H)Si—N(M)SiMe₃ are decreased. The reaction behaviour of the amides 1a‐Na — 1c‐Na and 1a‐K — 1c‐K was investigated toward chlorotrimethylsilane in tetrahydrofuran (THF) and in n‐pentane. In THF the amides produced just like the analogous lithium amides the corresponding N‐silylation products Me₂(H)Si—N(SiMe₃)R′ ( 2a — 2c ) in high yields. The reaction of the sodium amides with chlorotrimethylsilane in nonpolar solvent n‐pentane produced from 1a‐Na the cyclodisilazane [Me₂Si—NCMe₃]₂ ( 8a ), from 1b‐Na and 1‐Na mixtures of cyclodisilazane [Me₂Si—NR′]₂ ( 8b , 8c ) and N‐silylation product 2b , 2c . In contrast to 1b‐Na and 1c‐Na and to the analogous lithium amides the reaction of 1b‐K and 1c‐K with chlorotrimethylsilane afforded the N‐silylation products Me₂(H)Si—N(SiMe₃)R′ ( 2b , 2c ) in high yields. The amide [(Me₃C)₂(H)Si—N(K)SiMe₃]₂·THF ( 9 ) crystallizes in the space group C2/c with Z = 4. The central part of the molecule is a planar four‐membered K₂N₂ ring. One potassium atom is coordinated by two nitrogen atoms and the other one by two nitrogen atoms and one oxygen atom. Furthermore K···H(Si) and K···CH₃ contacts exist in 9 . The K—N distances in the K₂N₂ ring differ marginally.     

Halogenid‐Ionen als Katalysator: Metallzentrierte C–C‐Bindungsknüpfung ausgehend von Acetontril

Halide Ions as Catalyst: Metalcentered C–C Bond Formation Proceeded from Acetonitril AlMe₃ reacts at 20 ?C in acetonitrile to the complex [Me₃Al(NCMe)] ( 1 ). By addition of cesium halides (X^– = F^–, Cl^–, Br^–) a trimerisation to the heterocycle [Me₂Al{HNC(Me)}₂C(CN)] ( 2 ) has been observed. The reaction might be carried out under catalytic conditions (1–2 mol% CsX). The gallium complex [Me₂Ga{HNC(Me)}₂ · C(CN)] ( 3 ), generated under similar reaction conditions, can be converted to the silylated compound [Me₂Ga{Me₃SiNC(Me)}₂C(CN)] ( 4 ) by successive treatment with two equivalents n‐butyllithium and Me₃SiCl. 3 reacts under hydrolysis conditions (1 M hydrochloric acid) to the iminium salt [{H₂NC(Me)}₂C(CN)]Cl ( 5 ). A mixture of H₂O, Ph₂PCl and 3 in THF/toluene leads in a unusual conversion to the diphospane derivative [Ph₂P–P(O)(Me₂GaCl)] ( 6 ). 1 , 2 , 4 , 5 and 6 have been characterized by NMR, IR and MS techniques. X‐ray structure analyses were performed with 1 , 2 , 4 and 6 · 0.5 toluene. According this 1 possesses an almost linear axis AlNCC [Al1–N1–C3: 179,5(2)?; N1–C3–C4: 179,7(4)?]. 2 is an AlN₂C₃ six‐membered heterocycle with two iminium fuctions. One N–H group is responsible for a intermolecular chain‐formation through hydrogen bridges to an adjacent nitrile group along the direction [010]. The basic structural motif of the heterocycle 3 has been maintained after silylation to 4 . In 6 · 0.5 toluene an unit Me₂GaCl, originated from 3 , is coordinated to the oxygen atom of the diphosphane oxide Ph₂P–P(O)Ph₂.     

Einfache Synthese von Alkylaluminium‐ und Alkylgalliumhydriden – Kristallstrukturen von [(Me3C)2GaH]3 und den neuartigen Sesquihydriden [(Me3C)2EH]2[EH2CMe3]2 (E = Al,Ga)

Facile Syntheses of Alkylaluminium and Alkylgallium Hydrides – Crystal Structures of [(Me₃C)₂GaH]₃ and the Novel Sesquihydrides [(Me₃C)₂EH]₂[EH₂CMe₃]₂ (E = Al, Ga) The facile syntheses of some important, sterically highly shielded dialkylaluminium hydrides R₂AlH [R = CMe₃, CH(SiMe₃)₂] succeeded by the reaction of the corresponding trialkylaluminium compounds with the alane adduct AlH₃ × NMe₂Et in a 2 to 1 molar ratio. This route is not suitable for the synthesis of monoalkylaluminium dihydrides. An excess of AlH₃ yielded the novel sesquihydride [(Me₃C)₂AlH]₂[AlH₂CMe₃]₂ ( 3 ) as the hydride richest compound which possesses an unprecedented heterocycle comprising four aluminium and four hydrogen atoms in the solid state. The dialkylgallium hydride (Me₃C)₂GaH ( 4 ) was formed on a similar route by the treatment of tri(tert‐butyl)gallane with the adduct GaH₃ · NMe₂Et. As shown by a crystal structure determination, compound 4 is a trimer in the solid state possessing a Ga₃H₃ heterocycle. A gallium sesquihydride analogous to compound 3 , [(Me₃C)₂GaH]₂[GaH₂CMe₃]₂ ( 5 ), was formed on employing an excess of GaH₃.     

Die Umsetzung von Dialkylaluminiumchloriden mit Bis(trimethylsilyl)hydrazin: Bildung von Addukten R2AlCl · NH2NHSiMe3 mit dem thermisch unbeständigen Trimethylsilylhydrazin

The Reaction of Dialkylaluminium Chlorides with Bis(trimethylsilyl)hydrazine: Formation of the Adducts R₂AlCl · NH₂NHSiMe₃ Containing the Unstable Monotrimethylsilylhydrazine Bis(trimethylsilyl)hydrazine did not react with dialkylaluminium chlorides R₂AlCl [R = CH₂CMe₃, CMe₃ and CH(SiMe₃)₂] by the formation of trimethylchlorosilane, but by dismutation to yield tris(trimethylsilyl)hydrazine and trimethylsilylhydrazine. The unstable, sterically less shielded NH₂NHSiMe₃ was stabilized by the coordination to the coordinatively unsaturated aluminium compounds. The adducts R₂AlCl · NH₂NHSiMe₃ were formed, which were characterized by crystal structure determinations with R = CMe₃ and CH(SiMe₃)₂. In all cases, the hydrazine derivative binds to the aluminium atoms via the more basic NH₂ nitrogen atom. The adduct Me₃CAlCl₂ · NH₂N(SiMe₃)₂ containing intact 1,1‐bis(trimethylsilyl)hydrazine as a ligand was isolated in a trace amount and also characterized by a crystal structure determination.     

Imino‐Bridged Bisphosphaalkenes (2,4‐Diphospha‐3‐azapentadienes)

Deprotonation of aminophosphaalkenes (RMe₂Si)₂C?PN(H)(R′) (R=Me, iPr; R′=tBu, 1‐adamantyl (1‐Ada), 2,4,6‐tBu₃C₆H₂ (Mes*)) followed by reactions of the corresponding Li salts Li[(RMe₂Si)₂C?P(M)(R′)] with one equivalent of the corresponding P‐chlorophosphaalkenes (RMe₂Si)₂C?PCl provides bisphosphaalkenes (2,4‐diphospha‐3‐azapentadienes) [(RMe₂Si)₂C?P]₂NR′. The thermally unstable tert‐butyliminobisphosphaalkene [(Me₃Si)₂C?P]₂NtBu ( 4 a ) undergoes isomerisation reactions by Me₃Si‐group migration that lead to mixtures of four‐membered heterocyles, but in the presence of an excess amount of (Me₃Si)₂C?PCl, 4 a furnishes an azatriphosphabicyclohexene C₃(SiMe₃)₅P₃NtBu ( 5 ) that gave red single crystals. Compound 5 contains a diphosphirane ring condensed with an azatriphospholene system that exhibits an endocylic P?C double bond and an exocyclic ylidic P⁽⁺⁾? C^(?)(SiMe₃)₂ unit. Using the bulkier iPrMe₂Si substituents at three‐coordinated carbon leads to slightly enhanced thermal stability of 2,4‐diphospha‐3‐azapentadienes [(iPrMe₂Si)₂C?P]₂NR′ (R′=tBu: 4 b ; R′=1‐Ada: 8 ). According to a low‐temperature crystal‐structure determination, 8 adopts a non‐planar structure with two distinctly differently oriented P?C sites, but ³¹P NMR spectra in solution exhibit singlet signals. ³¹P NMR spectra also reveal that bulky Mes* groups (Mes*=2,4,6‐tBu₃C₆H₂) at the central imino function lead to mixtures of symmetric and unsymmetric rotamers, thus implying hindered rotation around the P? N bonds in persistent compounds [(RMe₂Si)₂C?P]₂NMes* ( 11 a , 11 b ). DFT calculations for the parent molecule [(H₃Si)₂C?P]₂NCH₃ suggest that the non‐planar distortion of compound 8 will have steric grounds.     

Methyl 2‐benzamido‐4‐(3,4‐dimethoxyphenyl)‐5‐methylbenzoate and N‐{5‐benzoyl‐2‐[(Z)‐2‐methoxyethenyl]‐4‐methylphenyl}benzamide

Methyl 2‐benzamido‐4‐(3,4‐dimethoxyphenyl)‐5‐methylbenzoate, C₂₄H₂₃NO₅, (Ia), and N‐{5‐benzoyl‐2‐[(Z)‐2‐methoxyethenyl]‐4‐methylphenyl}benzamide, C₂₄H₂₁NO₃, (IIa), were formed via a Diels–Alder reaction of appropriately substituted 2H‐pyran‐2‐ones and methyl propiolate or (Z)‐1‐methoxybut‐1‐en‐3‐yne, respectively. Each of these cycloadditions might yield two different regioisomers, but just one was obtained in each case. In (Ia), an intramolecular N—H...O hydrogen bond closes a six‐membered ring. A chain is formed due to aromatic π–π interactions, and a three‐dimensional framework structure is formed by a combination of C—H...O and C—H...π(arene) hydrogen bonds. Compound (IIa) was formed not only regioselectively but also chemoselectively, with just the triple bond reacting and the double bond remaining unchanged. Compound (IIa) crystallizes as N—H...O hydrogen‐bonded dimers stabilized by aromatic π–π interactions. Dimers of (IIa) are connected into a chain by weak C—H...π(arene) interactions.     

The diastereoisomers 2‐[(S/R)‐2‐chloro‐3‐quinolyl]‐2‐[(R)‐1‐(4‐methoxyphenyl)ethylamino]acetonitrile at 100 K

In the structures of the two enantiopure diastereoisomers of the title compound, C₂₀H₁₈ClN₃O, which crystallize in different space groups, the molecules are very similar as far as bond distances and angles are concerned, but more substantial differences are observed in some torsion angles. The crystal structures of both molecules can be described as zigzag layers along the c axis. The packing is stabilized by hydrogen‐bond interactions of N—H...O, C—H...Cl and C—H...π types for 2‐[(R)‐2‐chloro‐3‐quinolyl]‐2‐[(R)‐1‐(4‐methoxyphenyl)ethylamino]acetonitrile, and of N—H...N, C—H...O and C—H...π types for 2‐[(S)‐2‐chloro‐3‐quinolyl]‐2‐[(R)‐1‐(4‐methoxyphenyl)ethylamino]acetonitrile, resulting in the formation of two‐ and three‐dimensional networks.     

tert‐Butyldiphenylsilylhydrazin – ein Baustein für Tetrakis‐silylhydrazine,Silylhydrazone und O‐Silylpyrazolone

tert ‐Butyldiphenylsilylhydrazine – Precursors for Tetra(silyl)hydrazines, Silylhydrazones, and O‐Silylpyrazolones tert‐Butylchlorodiphenylsilane reacts with hydrazine in presence of triethylamine to give the mono(silyl)hydrazine Me₃CSiPh₂NHNH₂ ( 1 ). The lithium derivative of 1 ( 1 a ) forms the N,N′‐bis(silyl)hydrazines 2 and 3 in the reaction with chlorosilanes. ( 2 : Me₃CSiPh₂NHNHSiPh₂CMe₃; 3 : Me₃CSiPh₂NHNHSiMe₂CMe₃). The monomeric dilithiumhydrazide 4 , (Me₃CSiPh₂)₂N₂Li₂(THF)₃, is obtained from 2 and the bimolar amount of C₄H₉Li in THF. 4 reacts with an excess of SiF₄ to give the tetra(silyl)hydrazine 5 , Me₃CSiPh₂(SiF₃)N–N(SiF₃)SiPh₂CMe₃. 1 and ketones undergo condensation to silylhydrazones, Me₃CSiPh₂NHN=C(Me)R ( 6 : R = Me; 7 : R = CMe₃), with elimination of H₂O. Only one of the two possible isomers of 7 is formed. Cis/trans isomers ( 8 a , b ) are obtained in the analogous reaction of 1 and ethyl acetoacetate, Me₃CSiPh₂NH–N=CMe–CH₂–COOEt ( 8 a , b ). 8 condenses thermally with elimination of EtOH and formation of the O‐silylpyrazolone 9 , Me₃CSiPh₂O–(C=N–NH–CMe=CH–). The results of the crystal structure analysis of the compounds 2 , 4 , and 7 are reported.     

Syntheses and crystal structures of triorganotin (IV) derivatives with 2,2′‐bipyridine‐4,4′‐dicarboxylic acid

Four organotin complexes with 2,2′‐bipyridine‐4,4′‐dicarboxylic acid, H₂dcbp: (Ph₃n)₂(dcbp) 1 , [(PhCH₂)₃n]₂(dcbp) ⋅ 2CH₃OH 2 , [(Me₃Sn)₂(dcbp)]_n 3 , [(Bu₃Sn)₂(dcbp)]_n 4 have been synthesized. The complexes 1–4 were characterized by elemental, IR, ¹H, ¹³C, ¹¹⁹n NMR, and X‐ray crystallographic analyses. Crystal structures show that complex 1 is a monomer with one ligand coordinated to two triorganotin moieties, and a 1D infinite polymeric chain generates via intermolecular C H⋅⋅⋅N hydrogen bond; complex 2 is also a monomer and forms a 2D network by intermolecular O–H⋅⋅⋅O weak interaction; both of complexes 3 and 4 form 2D network structures where 2,2′‐bipyridine‐4,4′‐dicarboxylate acts as a tetradentate ligand coordinated to trimethyltin and tri‐n‐butyltin ions, respectively. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Heteroatom Chem 20:19–28, 2009; Published online in Wiley InterScience ( www.interscience.wiley.com ). DOI 10.1002/hc.20506     

New Ga/N‐based Active Lewis Pairs,Trifunctional Ga–Ga Compounds,Reactions with Cyanamide and Dual Insertion of Isocyanate

Hydrogallation of Me₃Si–C≡C–NR'₂ with R₂Ga–H (R = tBu, CH₂tBu, iBu) yielded Ga/N‐based active Lewis pairs, R₂Ga–C(SiMe₃)=C(H)–NR'₂ ( 7 ). The Ga and N atoms adopt cis‐positions at the C=C bonds and show weak Ga–N interactions. tBu₂GaH and Me₃Si–C≡C–N(C₂H₄)₂NMe afforded under exposure of daylight the trifunctional digallium(II) compound [MeN(C₂H₄)₂N](H)C=C(SiMe₃)Ga(tBu)–Ga(tBu)C(SiMe₃)=C(H)[N(C₂H₄)₂NMe] ( 8 ), which results from elimination of isobutene and H₂ and Ga–Ga bond formation. 8 was selectively obtained from the ynamine and [tBu(H)Ga–Ga(H)tBu]₂[HGatBu₂]₂. 7a (R = tBu; NR'₂ = 2,6‐Me₂NC₅H₈) and H₈C₄N–C≡N afforded the adduct tBu₂Ga‐C(SiMe₃)=C(H)(2,6‐Me₂NC₅H₈) · N≡C–NC₄H₈ ( 11 ) with the nitrile bound to gallium. The analogous ALP with harder Al atoms yielded an adduct of the nitrile dimer or oligomers of the nitrile at room temperature. The reaction of 7a with Ph–N=C=O led to the insertion of two NCO groups into the Ga–C_vinyl bond to yield a GaOCNCN heterocycle with Ga bound to O and N atoms ( 12 ).     

Calcium‐Catalyzed Arene C−H Bond Activation by Low‐Valent AlI

The low‐valent ß‐diketiminate complex (^DIPPBDI)Al is stable in benzene but addition of catalytic quantities of [(^DIPPBDI)CaH]₂ at 20 °C led to (^DIPPBDI)Al(Ph)H (^DIPPBDI=CH[C(CH₃)N‐DIPP]₂, DIPP=2,6‐diisopropylphenyl). Similar Ca‐catalyzed C?H bond activation is demonstrated for toluene or p‐xylene. For toluene a remarkable selectivity for meta‐functionalization has been observed. Reaction of (^DIPPBDI)Al(m‐tolyl)H with I₂ gave m‐tolyl iodide, H₂ and (^DIPPBDI)AlI₂ which was recycled to (^DIPPBDI)Al. Attempts to catalyze this reaction with Mg or Zn hydride catalysts failed. Instead, the highly stable complexes (^DIPPBDI)Al(H)M(^DIPPBDI) (M=Mg, Zn) were formed. DFT calculations on the Ca hydride catalyzed arene alumination suggest that a similar but more loosely bound complex is formed: (^DIPPBDI)Al(H)Ca(^DIPPBDI). This is in equilibrium with the hydride bridged complex (^DIPPBDI)Al(μ‐H)Ca(^DIPPBDI) which shows strongly increased electron density at Al. The combination of Ca‐arene bonding and a highly nucleophilic Al center are key to facile C?H bond activation.     

The Unexpected Mechanism Underlying the High‐Valent Mono‐Oxo‐Rhenium(V) Hydride Catalyzed Hydrosilylation of CN Functionalities: Insights from a DFT Study

In this study, we theoretically investigated the mechanism underlying the high‐valent mono‐oxo‐rhenium(V) hydride Re(O)HCl₂(PPh₃)₂ ( 1 ) catalyzed hydrosilylation of C?N functionalities. Our results suggest that an ionic S_N2‐Si outer‐sphere pathway involving the heterolytic cleavage of the Si?H bond competes with the hydride pathway involving the C?N bond inserted into the Re?H bond for the rhenium hydride ( 1 ) catalyzed hydrosilylation of the less steric C?N functionalities (phenylmethanimine, PhCH=NH, and N‐phenylbenzylideneimine, PhCH=NPh). The rate‐determining free‐energy barriers for the ionic outer‐sphere pathway are calculated to be ～28.1 and 27.6 kcal mol^?1, respectively. These values are slightly more favorable than those obtained for the hydride pathway (by ～1–3 kcal mol^?1), whereas for the large steric C?N functionality of N,1,1‐tri(phenyl)methanimine (PhCPh=NPh), the ionic outer‐sphere pathway (33.1 kcal mol^?1) is more favorable than the hydride pathway by as much as 11.5 kcal mol^?1. Along the ionic outer‐sphere pathway, neither the multiply bonded oxo ligand nor the inherent hydride moiety participate in the activation of the Si?H bond.