Competition between Hetero‐Diels‐Alder and Cheletropic Additions of Sulfur Dioxide to 2‐Substituted Buta‐1,3‐dienes. Synthesis of 2‐(1‐Naphthyl)‐ and 2‐(2‐Naphthyl)buta‐1,3‐diene

Chloroprene (=2‐chlorobuta‐1,3‐diene; 4b ) and electron‐rich dienes such as 2‐methoxy‐( 4c ), 2‐acetoxy‐( 4d ), and 2‐(phenylseleno)buta‐1,3‐diene ( 4e ) refused to equilibrate with the corresponding sultines 5 or 6 between −80 and −10° in the presence of excess SO₂ and an acidic promoter. Isoprene ( 4a ) and 2‐(triethylsilyl)‐( 4f ), 2‐phenyl‐( 4g ), and 2‐(2‐naphthyl)buta‐1,3‐diene ( 4i ) underwent the hetero‐Diels‐Alder additions with SO₂ at low temperature. In contrast, 2‐(1‐naphthyl)buta‐1,2‐diene ( 4h ) did not. With dienes 4a, 4g , and 4i , the hetero‐Diels‐Alder additions with SO₂ gave the corresponding 4‐substituted sultine 5 with high regioselectivity. In the case of 4g +SO₂⇄ 5g , the energy barrier for isomerization of 5g to 5‐phenylsultine ( 6g ) was similar to that of the cheletropic addition of 4g to give 3‐phenylsulfolene ( 7g ). The hetero‐Diels‐Alder addition of 4f gave a 1 : 4 mixture of the 4‐(triethylsilyl)sultine ( 5f ) and 5‐(triethylsilyl)sultine ( 6f ). The preparation of the two new dienes 4h and 4i is reported.     

Substituent Effect on the Competition between Hetero‐Diels‐Alder and Cheletropic Additions of Sulfur Dioxide to 1‐Substituted Buta‐1,3‐dienes

The reactivity of sulfur dioxide toward variously substituted butadienes was explored in an effort to define the factors affecting the competition between the hetero‐Diels‐Alder and cheletropic additions. At low temperature (<−70°), 1‐alkyl‐substituted 1,3‐dienes 1 that can adopt s‐cis‐conformations add to SO₂ in the hetero‐Diels‐Alder mode in the presence of CF₃COOH as promoter. In the case of (E)‐1‐ethylidene‐2‐methylidenecyclohexane ((E)‐ 4a ), the [4+2] cycloaddition of SO₂ is fast at −90° without acid catalyst. (E)‐1‐(Acyloxy)buta‐1,3‐dienes (E)‐ 1c , (E)‐ 1y , and (E)‐ 1z with AcO, BzO, and naphthalene‐2‐(carbonyloxy) substituents, respectively also undergo the hetero‐Diels‐Alder addition with SO₂+CF₃COOH at low temperatures, giving a 1 : 10 mixture of the corresponding cis‐ and trans‐6‐(acyloxy)sultines c‐ 2c,y,z and t‐ 2c,y,z , respectively). Above −50°, the sultines undergo complete cycloreversion to the corresponding dienes and SO₂, which that add in the cheletropic mode at higher temperature to give the corresponding 2‐substituted sulfolenes (=2,5‐dihydrothiophene 1,1‐dioxides) 3 . The hetero‐Diels‐Alder additions of SO₂ follow the Alder endo rule, giving first the 6‐substituted cis‐sultines that equilibrate then with the more stable trans‐isomers. This statement is based on the assumption that the S=O group in the sultine prefers a pseudo‐axial rather than a pseudo‐equatorial position, as predicted by quantum calculations. The most striking observation is that electron‐rich dienes such as 1‐cyclopropyl‐, 1‐phenyl‐, 1‐(4‐methoxyphenyl)‐, 1‐(trimethylsilyl)‐, 1‐phenoxy‐, 1‐(4‐chlorophenoxy)‐, 1‐(4‐methoxyphenoxy)‐, 1‐(4‐nitrophenoxy)‐, 1‐(naphthalen‐2‐yloxy)‐, 1‐(methylthio)‐, 1‐(phenylthio)‐, 1‐[(4‐chlorophenyl)thio]‐, 1‐[(4‐methoxyphenyl)thio]‐, 1‐[(4‐nitrophenyl)thio]‐, and 1‐(phenylseleno)buta‐1,3‐diene, as well as 1‐(methoxymethylidene)‐2‐methylidenecyclohexane ( 4f ) do not equilibrate with the corresponding sultines between −100 and −10°, in the presence of a large excess of SO₂, with or without acidic promoter. The hetero‐Diels‐Alder additions of SO₂ to 1‐substituted (E)‐buta‐1,3‐dienes are highly regioselective, giving exclusively the corresponding 6‐substituted sultines. The 1‐substituted (Z)‐buta‐1,3‐dienes do not undergo the hetero‐Diels‐Alder additions with sulfur dioxide.     

Hetero‐Diels‐Alder and Cheletropic Additions of Sulfur Dioxide to 1,2‐Dimethylidenecycloalkanes. Determination of Thermochemical and Kinetics Parameters for Reactions in Solution and Comparison with Estimates From Quantum Calculations

Below −60° and without catalyst, 1,2‐dimethylidenecyclopentane ( 16 ), 1,2‐dimethylidenecyclohexane ( 13 ), 1,2‐dimethylidenecycloheptane ( 17 ), and 1,2‐dimethylidenecyclooctane ( 18 ) add to sulfur dioxide in the hetero‐Diels‐Alder mode, giving the corresponding sultines 4,5,6,7‐tetrahydro‐1H‐cyclopent[d][1,2]oxathiin 3‐oxide ( 19 ), 1,4,5,6,7,8‐hexahydro‐2,3‐benzoxathiin 3‐oxide ( 14 ), 4,5,6,7,8,9‐hexahydro‐1H‐cyclohept[d][1,2]oxathiin 3‐oxide ( 20 ), and 1,4,5,6,7,8,9,10‐octahydrocyclooct[d][1,2]oxathiin 3‐oxide ( 21 ), respectively. Above −40°, the sultines are isomerized into the corresponding sulfolenes 3,4,5,6‐tetrahydro‐1H‐cyclopenta[c]thiophene 2,2‐dioxide ( 22 ), 1,3,4,5,6,7‐hexahydrobenzo[c]thiophene 2,2‐dioxide ( 15 ), 3,4,5,6,7,8‐hexahydro‐1H‐cyclohepta[c]thiophene 2,2‐dioxide ( 23 ), and 1,3,4,5,6,7,8,9‐octahydrocycloocta[c]thiophene 2,2‐dioxide ( 24 ). Kinetics and thermodynamics data were collected for these reactions. The sultines are ca. 10 kcal/mol Diels‐Alder additions (ΔH^≠( 16 −36±3 cal mol⁻¹ K⁻¹) in agreement with third‐order rate laws that imply that two molecules of SO₂ intervene in the transition states of these cycloadditions. Similar observations were made for the cheletropic additions of SO₂. Attempts to simulate the thermodynamics and kinetics parameters of the reactions of SO₂ with dienes 16 and 13 by density‐functional theory (DFT) suggest that the calculations require an appropriate number of polarization functions in the basis set employed. A satisfactory recipe to compute the SO₂ additions to large dienes can be: B3LYP/6‐31G(d) geometry optimizations followed by B3LYP/6‐31+G(2df,p) single‐point calculations or G2(MP2,SVP) estimates on the B3LYP/6‐31G(d) geometries.     

1,N6‐Etheno‐2′‐deoxytubercidin hemihydrate

The title compound [systematic name: 7‐(2‐deoxy‐β‐d ‐erythro‐pentofuranosyl)‐7H‐imidazo[1,2‐c]pyrrolo[2,3‐d]pyrimidine hemihydrate], 2C₁₃H₁₄N₄O₃·H₂O or (I)·0.5H₂O, shows two similar conformations in the asymmetric unit. These two conformers are connected through one water molecule by hydrogen bonds. The N‐glycosylic bonds of both conformers show an almost identical anti conformation with χ = −107.7 (2)° for conformer (I‐1) and −107.0 (2)° for conformer (I‐2). The sugar moiety adopts an unusual N‐type (C3′‐endo) sugar pucker for 2′‐deoxyribonucleosides, with P = 36.8 (2)° and τ_m = 40.6 (1)° for conformer (I‐1), and P = 34.5 (2)° and τ_m = 41.4 (1)° for conformer (I‐2). Both conformers and the solvent molecule participate in the formation of a three‐dimensional pattern with a `chain'‐like arrangement of the conformers. The structure is stabilized by intermolecular O—H...O and O—H...N hydrogen bonds, together with weak C—H...O contacts.     

2′‐De­oxy‐2‐fluoro­tubercidin

In the title compound [systematic name: 7‐(2‐de­oxy‐β‐d ‐erythro‐pentofuranos­yl)‐2‐fluoro‐7H‐pyrrolo[2,3‐d]pyrimidin‐2‐amine], C₁₁H₁₃FN₄O₃, the conformation of the N‐glycosylic bond is between anti and high‐anti [χ = −110.2 (3)°]. The 2′‐deoxy­ribofuranosyl unit adopts the N‐type sugar pucker (₄T³), with P = 40.3° and τ_m = 39.2°. The orientation of the exocyclic C4′—C5′ bond is −ap (trans), with a torsion angle γ = −168.39 (18)°. The nucleobases are arranged head‐to‐head. The crystal structure is stabilized by four inter­molecular hydrogen bonds of types N—H⋯N, N—H⋯O and O—H⋯O.     

Synthesis of New Pyrano[2′,3′: 5,6]chromeno[4,3‐b]quinolin‐4‐ones via Aza‐DielsAlder Reaction

New pyrano[2′,3′: 5,6]chromeno[4,3‐b]quinolin‐4‐ones have been synthesized by intramolecular aza‐Diels? Alder reaction of the azadienes generated in situ from aryl amines and 8‐formyl‐7‐(prop‐2‐ynyl)2,3‐disubstituted chromones using CuFe₂O₄ nanoparticles as a catalyst in DMSO at 80–90° in good‐to‐excellent yields. Particularly valuable features of this methodology include simple implementation, inexpensive and reusable catalyst, and good yields. The structures were established by spectroscopic data and further confirmed by X‐ray diffraction analysis of one of the products.     

Novel Synthesis of 2‐Alkylquinolizinium‐1‐olates and Their 1,3‐Dipolar Cycloaddition Reactions with Acetylenes

Several 2‐alkylquinolizinium‐1‐olates 9 , i.e., heterobetaines, were prepared from ketone 11 , the latter being readily available either from pyridine‐2‐carbaldehyde via a Grignard reaction, followed by oxidation with MnO₂, or from 2‐picolinic acid (=pyridine‐2‐carboxylic acid) via the corresponding Weinreb amide and subsequent Grignard reaction. Mesoionic heterobetaines such as quinolizinium derivatives have the potential to undergo cycloaddition reactions with double and triple bonds, e.g., 1,3‐dipolar cycloadditions or Diels? Alder reactions. We here report on the scope and limitations of cycloaddition reactions of 2‐alkylquinolizinium‐1‐olates 9 with electron‐poor acetylene derivatives. As main products of the reaction, 5‐oxopyrrolo[2,1,5‐de]quinolizines (=‘[2.3.3]cyclazin‐5‐ones’) 19 were formed via a regioselective [2+3] cycloaddition, and cyclohexadienone derivatives, formed via a Diels? Alder reaction, were obtained as side products. The structures of 2‐benzylquinolizinium‐1‐olate ( 9a ) and two ‘[2.3.3]cyclazin‐5‐ones’ 19i and 19l were established by X‐ray crystallography.     

Methyl β‐d‐galactopyranosyl‐(1→4)‐β‐d‐allopyranoside tetrahydrate

The title compound, C₁₃H₂₄O₁₁·4H₂O, (I), crystallized from water, has an internal glycosidic linkage conformation having ϕ′ (O5_Gal—C1_Gal—O1_Gal—C4_All) = −96.40 (12)° and ψ′ (C1_Gal—O1_Gal—C4_All—C5_All) = −160.93 (10)°, where ring‐atom numbering conforms to the convention in which C1 denotes the anomeric C atom, C5 the ring atom bearing the exocyclic hydroxymethyl group, and C6 the exocyclic hydroxymethyl (CH₂OH) C atom in the βGalp and βAllp residues. Internal linkage conformations in the crystal structures of the structurally related disaccharides methyl β‐lactoside [methyl β‐d ‐galactopyranosyl‐(1→4)‐β‐d ‐glucopyranoside] methanol solvate [Stenutz, Shang & Serianni (1999). Acta Cryst. C 55 , 1719–1721], (II), and methyl β‐cellobioside [methyl β‐d ‐glucopyranosyl‐(1→4)‐β‐d ‐glucopyranoside] methanol solvate [Ham & Williams (1970). Acta Cryst. B 26 , 1373–1383], (III), are characterized by ϕ′ = −88.4 (2)° and ψ′ = −161.3 (2)°, and ϕ′ = −91.1° and ψ′ = −160.7°, respectively. Inter‐residue hydrogen bonding is observed between O3_Glc and O5_Gal/Glc in the crystal structures of (II) and (III), suggesting a role in determining their preferred linkage conformations. An analogous inter‐residue hydrogen bond does not exist in (I) due to the axial orientation of O3_All, yet its internal linkage conformation is very similar to those of (II) and (III).     

The high‐anti conformation of 8‐aza‐1,3‐dide­aza‐2′‐deoxy­adenosine

In the title compound, 4‐amino‐1‐(2‐deoxy‐β‐d ‐erythro‐pento­furan­osyl)‐1H‐benzotriazole, C₁₁H₁₄N₄O₃, the conformation of the N‐glycosidic bond is in the high‐anti range [χ = ?77.1 (4)°] and the 2′‐deoxy­ribo­furan­ose moiety adopts a 2′‐­endo (²E) sugar puckering. The 5′‐hydroxyl group is disordered and has conformations ap with γ = 171.1 (3)° [occupation of 61.4 (3)%] and +sc with γ = 52.4 (6)° [occupation of 38.6 (3)%]. The nucleobases are stacked in the crystal state.     

Diversity‐Oriented Synthesis of Novel 2′‐Aminospiro[11H‐indeno[1,2‐b]quinoxaline‐11,4′‐[4H]pyran] Derivatives via a One‐Pot Four‐Component Reaction

A sequential one‐pot four‐component reaction for the efficient synthesis of novel 2′‐aminospiro[11H‐indeno[1,2‐b]quinoxaline‐11,4′‐[4H]pyran] derivatives 5 in the presence of AcONH₄ as a neutral, inexpensive, and dually activating catalyst is described (Scheme 1). The syntheses are achieved by reacting ninhydrin ( 1 ) with benzene‐1,2‐diamines 2 to give indenoquinoxalines, which are trapped in situ by malono derivatives 2 and various α‐methylenecarbonyl compounds 4 through cyclization, providing the multifunctionalized 2′‐aminospiro[11H‐indeno[1,2‐b]quinoxaline‐11,4′‐[4H]pyran] analogs 5 . This chemistry provides an efficient and promising synthetic way of proceeding for the diversity‐oriented construction of the spiro[indenoquinoxalino‐pyran] skeleton.     

2‐Amino‐7‐chloro‐2′‐deoxy­tubercidin

In 4‐chloro‐7‐(2‐de­oxy‐β‐d ‐erythro‐pento­furanos­yl)‐7H‐pyr­rolo­[2,3‐d]­pyrimidine‐2,4‐diamine, C₁₁H₁₄ClN₅O₃, the conformation of the N‐glycosylic bond is between anti and high‐anti [χ = −102.5 (6)°]. The 2′‐deoxy­ribofuranosyl unit adopts the C3′‐endo‐C4′‐exo (³T₄) sugar pucker (N‐type) with P = 19.6° and τ_m = 32.9° [terminology: Saenger (1989). Landolt‐Börnstein New Series, Vol. 1, Nucleic Acids, Subvol. a, edited by O. Madelung, pp. 1–21. Berlin: Springer‐Verlag]. The orientation of the exocyclic C4′—C5′ bond is +ap (trans) with a torsion angle γ = 171.5 (4)°. The compound forms a three‐dimensional network that is stabilized by four inter­molecular hydrogen bonds (N—H⋯O and O—H⋯N) and one intra­molecular hydrogen bond (N—H⋯Cl).     

The 7‐bromo derivative of 2‐amino‐2′‐deoxytubercidin fluorinated at the sugar moiety

The title compound, 2,4‐diamino‐5‐bromo‐7‐(2‐deoxy‐2‐fluoro‐β‐d ‐arabinofuranosyl)‐7H‐pyrrolo[2,3‐d]pyrimidine, C₁₁H₁₃BrFN₅O₃, shows two conformations of the exocyclic C4′—C5′ bond, with the torsion angle γ (O5′—C5′—C4′—C3′) being 170.1 (3)° for conformer 1 (occupancy 0.69) and 60.7 (7)° for conformer 2 (occupancy 0.31). The N‐glycosylic bond exhibits an anti conformation, with χ = −114.8 (4)°. The sugar pucker is N‐type (C3′‐endo; ³T₄), with P = 23.3 (4)° and τ_m = 36.5 (2)°. The compound forms a three‐dimensional network that is stabilized by several intermolecular hydrogen bonds (N—H...O, O—H...N and N—H...Br).     

2‐Amino‐8‐(2‐deoxy‐2‐fluoro‐β‐d‐arabinofuranosyl)imidazo[1,2‐a][1,3,5]triazin‐4(8H)‐one monohydrate,a 2′‐deoxyguanosine analogue with an altered Watson–Crick recognition site

The title compound, C₁₀H₁₂FN₅O₄·H₂O, shows an anti glycosyl orientation [χ = −123.1 (2)°]. The 2‐deoxy‐2‐fluoroarabinofuranosyl moiety exhibits a major C2′‐endo sugar puckering (S‐type, C2′‐endo–C1′‐exo, ²T₁), with P = 156.9 (2)° and τ_m = 36.8 (1)°, while in solution a predominantly N conformation of the sugar moiety is observed. The conformation around the exocyclic C4′—C5′ bond is −sc (trans, gauche), with γ = −78.3 (2)°. Both nucleoside and solvent molecules participate in the formation of a three‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonding pattern via intermolecular N—H...O and O—H...O hydrogen bonds; the N atoms of the heterocyclic moiety and the F substituent do not take part in hydrogen bonding.     

7‐Cyclopropyl‐2′‐deoxytubercidin: a carbocyclic side‐chain derivative of 7‐deaza‐2′‐deoxyadenosine

The title compound {systematic name: 4‐amino‐5‐cyclopropyl‐7‐(2‐deoxy‐β‐D‐erythro‐pentofuranosyl)‐7H‐pyrrolo[2,3‐d]pyrimidine}, C₁₄H₁₈N₄O₃, exhibits an anti glycosylic bond conformation, with the torsion angle χ = −108.7 (2)°. The furanose group shows a twisted C1′‐exo sugar pucker (S‐type), with P = 120.0 (2)° and τ_m = 40.4 (1)°. The orientation of the exocyclic C4′—C5′ bond is ‐ap (trans), with the torsion angle γ = −167.1 (2)°. The cyclopropyl substituent points away from the nucleobase (anti orientation). Within the three‐dimensional extended crystal structure, the individual molecules are stacked and arranged into layers, which are highly ordered and stabilized by hydrogen bonding. The O atom of the exocyclic 5′‐hydroxy group of the sugar residue acts as an acceptor, forming a bifurcated hydrogen bond to the amino groups of two different neighbouring molecules. By this means, four neighbouring molecules form a rhomboidal arrangement of two bifurcated hydrogen bonds involving two amino groups and two O5′ atoms of the sugar residues.     

6‐Aza‐2′‐deoxy­uridine and N3‐anisoyl‐6‐aza‐2′‐deoxy­uridine

In 2‐(2‐deoxy‐β‐d ‐erythro‐pentofuranosyl)‐1,2,4‐triazine‐3,5(2H,4H)‐dione (6‐aza‐2′‐deoxy­uridine), C₈H₁₁N₃O₅, (I), the conformation of the glycosylic bond is between anti and high‐anti [χ = −94.0 (3)°], whereas the derivative 2‐(2‐deoxy‐β‐d ‐erythro‐pentofuranosyl)‐N⁴‐(2‐methoxy­benzoyl)‐1,2,4‐triazine‐3,5(2H,4H)‐dione (N³‐anisoyl‐6‐aza‐2′‐deoxy­uridine), C₁₆H₁₇N₃O₇, (II), displays a high‐anti conformation [χ = −86.4 (3)°]. The furanosyl moiety in (I) adopts the S‐type sugar pucker (²T₃), with P = 188.1 (2)° and τ_m = 40.3 (2)°, while the sugar pucker in (II) is N (³T₄), with P = 36.1 (3)° and τ_m = 33.5 (2)°. The crystal structures of (I) and (II) are stabilized by inter­molecular N—H⋯O and O—H⋯O inter­actions.     

2,2′‐Anhydro‐1‐(3′,5′‐di‐O‐acetyl‐β‐D‐arabinofuranosyl)uracil,a cyclouridine nucleoside with a C4′‐endo furanosyl conformation

2,2′‐Anhydro‐1‐(3′,5′‐di‐O‐acetyl‐β‐D‐arabinofuranosyl)uracil, C₁₃H₁₄N₂O₇, was obtained by refluxing 2′,3′‐O‐(methoxymethylene)uridine in acetic anhydride. The structure exhibits a nearly perfect C4′‐endo (⁴E) conformation. The best four‐atom plane of the five‐membered furanose ring is O—C—C—C, involving the C atoms of the fused five‐membered oxazolidine ring, and the torsion angle is only −0.4 (2)°. The oxazolidine ring is essentially coplanar with the six‐membered uracil ring [r.m.s. deviation = 0.012 (5) Å and dihedral angle = −3.2 (3)°]. The conformation at the exocyclic C—C bond is gauche–trans which is stabilized by various C—H...π and C—O...π interactions.     

N8‐(2′‐O‐Methyl­ribofuranos­yl)‐8‐aza‐7‐deaza­adenine monohydrate

In the title compound, 4‐amino‐2‐(2‐O‐methyl‐β‐d ‐ribofuranos­yl)‐2H‐pyrazolo[3,4‐d]pyrimidine monohydrate, C₁₁H₁₅N₅O₄·H₂O, the conformation of the N‐glycosylic bond is syn [χ = 20.1 (2)°]. The ribofuran­ose moiety shows a C3′‐endo (³T₂) sugar puckering (N‐type sugar), and the conformation at the exocyclic C4′—C5′ bond is −ap (trans). The nucleobases are stacked head‐to‐head. The three‐dimensional packing of the crystal structure is stabilized by hydrogen bonds between the 2′‐O‐methyl­ribonucleosides and the solvent mol­ecules.     

7‐Deaza‐2,8‐diaza­adenosine

In the title compound [systematic name: 4‐amino‐7‐(β‐d ‐ribofuranos­yl)‐7H‐pyrazolo[3,4‐d][1,2,3]triazine], C₉H₁₂N₆O₄, the torsion angle of the N‐glycosylic bond is high anti [χ = −83.2 (3)°]. The ribofuran­ose moiety adopts the C2′‐endo–C1′‐exo (²T₁) sugar conformation (S‐type sugar pucker), with P = 152.4° and τ_m = 35.0°. The conformation at the C4′—C5′ bond is +sc (gauche,gauche), with the torsion angle γ = 52.0 (3)°. The compound forms a three‐dimensional network that is stabilized by several hydrogen bonds (N—H⋯O, O—H⋯N and O—H⋯O).     

2′‐Deoxy‐7‐propynyl‐7‐deaza­adenosine: a DNA duplex‐stabilizing nucleoside

In the title compound, 2′‐deoxy‐7‐propynyl‐7‐deaza­adenosine, C₁₄H₁₆N₄O₃, the torsion angle of the N‐glycosylic bond is anti [χ = −130.7 (2)°]. The sugar pucker of the 2′‐deoxy­ribo­furanosyl moiety is C2′‐endo–C3′‐exo, ²T₃ (S‐type), with P = 185.9 (2)° and τ_m = 39.1 (1)°, and the orientation of the exocyclic C4′—C5′ bond is −ap (trans). The 7‐substituted propynyl group is nearly coplanar with the heterocyclic base moiety. Mol­ecules of the nucleoside form a layered network in which the heterocyclic bases are stacked head‐to‐tail with a closest distance of 3.197 (1) Å. The crystal structure of the nucleoside is stabilized by three inter­molecular hydrogen bonds of types N—H⋯ O, O—H⋯ N and O—H⋯ O.     

Catalyzed Asymmetric Diels?Alder Reactions of Benzoquinone. Total Synthesis of (−)‐Ibogamine

The Diels? Alder reaction of 1,4‐benzoquinone with 1,3‐dienes catalyzed by Mikami's [Ti{(S)‐binol(2?)}Cl₂] complex (binol=[1,1′‐binaphthalene]‐2,2′‐diol) gives cycloadducts in good yield and in high enantiomer excess. A model is proposed to explain the observed absolute configuration of cycloadducts, and the reaction is used as the key step in an asymmetric synthesis leading to the alkaloid (?)‐ibogamine.