Bordeaux 3-color conjecture and 3-choosability

A graph G=(V,E) is list L-colorable if for a given list assignment L={L(v):v∈V}, there exists a proper coloring c of G such that c(v)∈L(v) for all v∈V. If G is list L-colorable for every list assignment with |L(v)|?k for all v∈V, then G is said to be k-choosable.In this paper, we prove that (1) every planar graph either without 4- and 5-cycles, and without triangles at distance less than 4, or without 4-, 5- and 6-cycles, and without triangles at distance less than 3 is 3-choosable; (2) there exists a non-3-choosable planar graph without 4-cycles, 5-cycles, and intersecting triangles. These results have some consequences on the Bordeaux 3-color conjecture by Borodin and Raspaud [A sufficient condition for planar graphs to be 3-colorable. J. Combin. Theory Ser. B 88 (2003) 17-27].     

Acyclic 5-choosability of planar graphs without 4-cycles

A proper vertex coloring of a graph G=(V,E) is acyclic if G contains no bicolored cycle. A graph G is acyclically L-list colorable if for a given list assignment L={L(v):v∈V}, there exists a proper acyclic coloring π of G such that π(v)∈L(v) for all v∈V. If G is acyclically L-list colorable for any list assignment with |L(v)|≥k for all v∈V, then G is acyclically k-choosable. In this paper we prove that every planar graph without 4-cycles and without two 3-cycles at distance less than 3 is acyclically 5-choosable. This improves a result in [M. Montassier, P. Ochem, A. Raspaud, On the acyclic choosability of graphs, J. Graph Theory 51 (2006) 281-300], which says that planar graphs of girth at least 5 are acyclically 5-choosable.     

Equitable list coloring of planar graphs without 4- and 6-cycles

A graph G is equitably k-choosable if for any k-uniform list assignment L, there exists an L-colorable of G such that each color appears on at most vertices. Kostochka, Pelsmajer and West introduced this notion and conjectured that G is equitably k-choosable for k>Δ(G). We prove this for planar graphs with Δ(G)≥6 and no 4- or 6-cycles.     

Acyclic 5-choosability of planar graphs with neither 4-cycles nor chordal 6-cycles

A proper vertex coloring of a graph G=(V,E) is acyclic if G contains no bicolored cycle. A graph G is acyclically L-list colorable if for a given list assignment L={L(v):v∈V}, there exists a proper acyclic coloring ? of G such that ?(v)∈L(v) for all v∈V(G). If G is acyclically L-list colorable for any list assignment with |L(v)|≥k for all v∈V, then G is acyclically k-choosable. In this paper it is proved that every planar graph with neither 4-cycles nor chordal 6-cycles is acyclically 5-choosable. This generalizes the results of [M. Montassier, A. Raspaud, W. Wang, Acyclic 5-choosability of planar graphs without small cycles, J. Graph Theory 54 (2007) 245-260], and a corollary of [M. Montassier, P. Ochem, A. Raspaud, On the acyclic choosability of graphs, J. Graph Theory 51 (4) (2006) 281-300].     

Linear choosability of graphs

A proper vertex coloring of a non-oriented graph G is linear if the graph induced by the vertices of any two color classes is a forest of paths. A graph G is linearly L-list colorable if for a given list assignment L={L(v):v∈V(G)}, there exists a linear coloring c of G such that c(v)∈L(v) for all v∈V(G). If G is linearly L-list colorable for any list assignment with |L(v)|?k for all v∈V(G), then G is said to be linearly k-choosable. In this paper, we investigate the linear choosability for some families of graphs: graphs with small maximum degree, with given maximum average degree, outerplanar and planar graphs. Moreover, we prove that deciding whether a bipartite subcubic planar graph is linearly 3-colorable is an NP-complete problem.     

A note on list improper coloring of plane graphs

A list-assignment L to the vertices of G is an assignment of a set L(v) of colors to vertex v for every v∈V(G). An (L,d)^∗-coloring is a mapping ? that assigns a color ?(v)∈L(v) to each vertex v∈V(G) such that at most d neighbors of v receive color ?(v). A graph is called (k,d)^∗-choosable, if G admits an (L,d)^∗-coloring for every list assignment L with |L(v)|≥k for all v∈V(G). In this note, it is proved that every plane graph, which contains no 4-cycles and l-cycles for some l∈{8,9}, is (3,1)^∗-choosable.     

Acyclic 6-choosability of planar graphs without adjacent short cycles

A proper vertex coloring of a graph G is acyclic if G contains no bicolored cycles.Given a list assignment L={L(v)|v∈V}of G,we say that G is acyclically L-colorable if there exists a proper acyclic coloringπof G such thatπ(v)∈L(v)for all v∈V.If G is acyclically L-colorable for any list assignment L with|L(v)|k for all v∈V(G),then G is acyclically k-choosable.In this paper,we prove that every planar graph G is acyclically 6-choosable if G does not contain 4-cycles adjacent to i-cycles for each i∈{3,4,5,6}.This improves the result by Wang and Chen(2009).     

A note on the acyclic 3-choosability of some planar graphs

An acyclic coloring of a graph G is a coloring of its vertices such that: (i) no two adjacent vertices in G receive the same color and (ii) no bicolored cycles exist in G. A list assignment of G is a function L that assigns to each vertex v∈V(G) a list L(v) of available colors. Let G be a graph and L be a list assignment of G. The graph G is acyclically L-list colorable if there exists an acyclic coloring ? of G such that ?(v)∈L(v) for all v∈V(G). If G is acyclically L-list colorable for any list assignment L with |L(v)|≥k for all v∈V(G), then G is said to be acyclically k-choosable. Borodin et al. proved that every planar graph with girth at least 7 is acyclically 3-choosable (Borodin et al., submitted for publication [4]). More recently, Borodin and Ivanova showed that every planar graph without cycles of length 4 to 11 is acyclically 3-choosable (Borodin and Ivanova, submitted for publication [7]). In this note, we connect these two results by a sequence of intermediate sufficient conditions that involve the minimum distance between 3-cycles: we prove that every planar graph with neither cycles of lengths 4 to 7 (resp. to 8, to 9, to 10) nor triangles at distance less than 7 (resp. 5, 3, 2) is acyclically 3-choosable.     

Acyclic 4-choosability of planar graphs

A proper vertex coloring of a graph G=(V,E) is acyclic if G contains no bicolored cycle. Given a list assignment L={L(v)∣v∈V} of G, we say G is acyclically L-list colorable if there exists a proper acyclic coloring π of G such that π(v)∈L(v) for all v∈V. If G is acyclically L-list colorable for any list assignment with |L(v)|≥k for all v∈V, then G is acyclically k-choosable. In this paper we prove that planar graphs without 4, 7, and 8-cycles are acyclically 4-choosable.     

Planar graphs without 5-cycles or without 6-cycles

Let G be a planar graph without 5-cycles or without 6-cycles. In this paper, we prove that if G is connected and δ(G)≥2, then there exists an edge xy∈E(G) such that d(x)+d(y)≤9, or there is a 2-alternating cycle. By using the above result, we obtain that (1) its linear 2-arboricity , (2) its list total chromatic number is Δ(G)+1 if Δ(G)≥8, and (3) its list edge chromatic number is Δ(G) if Δ(G)≥8.     

Planar graphs without 3-, 7-, and 8-cycles are 3-choosable

A graph G is k-choosable if every vertex of G can be properly colored whenever every vertex has a list of at least k available colors. Grötzsch’s theorem [4] states that every planar triangle-free graph is 3-colorable. However, Voigt [M. Voigt, A not 3-choosable planar graph without 3-cycles, Discrete Math. 146 (1995) 325-328] gave an example of such a graph that is not 3-choosable, thus Grötzsch’s theorem does not generalize naturally to choosability. We prove that every planar triangle-free graph without 7- and 8-cycles is 3-choosable.     

(3, 1)*-Choosability of graphs of nonnegative characteristic without intersecting short cycles

A graph G is called (k,d)^?-choosable if for every list assignment L satisfying ∣L(v)∣ ≥k for all v∈V(G), there is an L-coloring of G such that each vertex of G has at most d neighbors colored with the same color as itself. In this paper, it is proved that every graph of nonnegative characteristic without intersecting i-cycles for all i=3,4,5 is (3,1)^?-choosable.     

A note on list improper coloring planar graphs

A graph G is called (k, d)^*-choosable if, for every list assignment L satisfying |L(v)| = k for all v ϵ V(G), there is an L-coloring of G such that each vertex of G has at most d neighbors colored with the same color as itself. In this note, we prove that every planar graph without 4-cycles and l-cycles for some l ϵ {5, 6, 7} is (3, 1)^*-choosable.     

Edge choosability of planar graphs without 5-cycles with a chord

Let G be a plane graph having no 5-cycles with a chord. If either Δ≥6, or Δ=5 and G contains no 4-cycles with a chord or no 6-cycles with a chord, then G is edge-(Δ+1)-choosable, where Δ denotes the maximum degree of G.     

Adaptable choosability of planar graphs with sparse short cycles

Given a (possibly improper) edge colouring F of a graph G, a vertex colouring of G is adapted toF if no colour appears at the same time on an edge and on its two endpoints. A graph G is called (for some positive integer k) if for any list assignment L to the vertices of G, with |L(v)|≥k for all v, and any edge colouring F of G, G admits a colouring c adapted to F where c(v)∈L(v) for all v. This paper proves that a planar graph G is adaptably 3-choosable if any two triangles in G have distance at least 2 and no triangle is adjacent to a 4-cycle.     

On 3-colorable non-4-choosable planar graphs

An L-list coloring of a graph G is a proper vertex coloring in which every vertex v gets a color from a list L(v) of allowed colors. G is called k-choosable if all lists L(v) have exactly k elements and if G is L-list colorable for all possible assignments of such lists. Verifying conjectures of Erdos, Rubin and Taylor it was shown during the last years that every planar graph is 5-choosable and that there are planar graphs which are not 4-choosable. The question whether there are 3-colorable planar graphs which are not 4-choosable remained unsolved. The smallest known example far a non-4-choosable planar graph has 75 vertices and is described by Gutner. In fact, this graph is also 3 colorable and answers the above question. In addition, we give a list assignment for this graph using 5 colors only in all of the lists together such that the graph is not List-colorable. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Acyclic chromatic indices of planar graphs with large girth

An acyclic edge coloring of a graph G is a proper edge coloring such that no bichromatic cycles are produced. The acyclic chromatic index a^′(G) of G is the smallest k such that G has an acyclic edge coloring using k colors.In this paper, we prove that every planar graph G with girth g(G) and maximum degree Δ has a^′(G)=Δ if there exists a pair (k,m)∈{(3,11),(4,8),(5,7),(8,6)} such that G satisfies Δ≥k and g(G)≥m.     

Vertex pancyclicity in quasi claw-free graphs

This paper generalizes the concept of locally connected graphs. A graph G is triangularly connected if for every pair of edges e₁,e₂∈E(G), G has a sequence of 3-cycles C₁,C₂,…,C_l such that e₁∈C₁,e₂∈C_l and E(C_i)∩E(C_i+1)≠∅ for 1?i?l-1. In this paper, we show that every triangularly connected quasi claw-free graph on at least three vertices is vertex pancyclic. Therefore, the conjecture proposed by Ainouche is solved.     

A characterization of maximal non-k-factor-critical graphs

A graph G of order p is k-factor-critical,where p and k are positive integers with the same parity, if the deletion of any set of k vertices results in a graph with a perfect matching. G is called maximal non-k-factor-critical if G is not k-factor-critical but G+e is k-factor-critical for every missing edge e∉E(G). A connected graph G with a perfect matching on 2n vertices is k-extendable, for 1?k?n-1, if for every matching M of size k in G there is a perfect matching in G containing all edges of M. G is called maximal non-k-extendable if G is not k-extendable but G+e is k-extendable for every missing edge e∉E(G) . A connected bipartite graph G with a bipartitioning set (X,Y) such that |X|=|Y|=n is maximal non-k-extendable bipartite if G is not k-extendable but G+xy is k-extendable for any edge xy∉E(G) with x∈X and y∈Y. A complete characterization of maximal non-k-factor-critical graphs, maximal non-k-extendable graphs and maximal non-k-extendable bipartite graphs is given.     

Every toroidal graph is acyclically 8-choosable

A proper coloring of a graphG is acyclic if G contains no 2-colored cycle.A graph G is acyclically L-list colorable if for a given list assignment L={L(v):v∈V(G)},there exists a proper acyclic coloringφof G such thatφ(v)∈L(v)for all v∈V(G).If G is acyclically L-list colorable for any list assignment L with|L(v)|≥k for all v∈V(G),then G is acyclically k-choosable.In this article,we prove that every toroidal graph is acyclically 8-choosable.