Zur Reaktivität von alkylthioverbrückten 44‐CVE‐triangularen Platinclustern: Umsetzungen mit bidentaten Phosphanliganden

On the Reactivity of Alkylthio Bridged 44 CVE Triangular Platinum Clusters: Reactions with Bidentate Phosphine Ligands The 44 cve (cluster valence electrons) triangular platinum clusters [{Pt(PR₃)}₃(μ‐SMe)₃]Cl (PR₃ = PPh₃, 2a ; P(4‐FC₆H₄)₃, 2b ; P(n‐Bu)₃, 2c ) were found to react with PPh₂CH₂PPh₂ (dppm) in a degradation reaction yielding dinuclear platinum(I) complexes [{Pt(PR₃)}₂(μ‐SMe)(μ‐dppm)]Cl (PR₃ = PPh₃, 3a ; P(4‐FC₆H₄)₃, 3b ; P(n‐Bu)₃; 3e ) and the platinum(II) complex [Pt(SMe)₂(dppm)] ( 4 ), whereas the addition of PPh₂CH₂CH₂PPh₂ (dppe) to cluster 2a afforded a mixture of degradation products, among others the complexes [Pt(dppe)₂] and [Pt(dppe)₂]Cl₂. On the other hand, the treatment of cluster 2a with PPh₂CH₂CH₂CH₂PPh₂ (dppp) ended up in the formation of the cationic complex [{Pt(dppp)}₂(μ‐SMe)₂]Cl₂ ( 5 ). Furthermore, the terminal PPh₃ ligands in complex 3a proved to be subject to substitution by the stronger donating monodentate phosphine ligands PMePh₂ and PMe₂Ph yielding the analogous complexes [{Pt(PR₃)}₂(μ‐SMe)(μ‐dppm)]Cl (PR₃ = PMePh₂, 3c ; PMe₂Ph, 3d ). NMR investigations on complexes 3 showed an inverse correlation of Tolmans electronic parameter ν with the coupling constants ¹J(Pt,P) and ¹J(Pt,Pt). All compounds were fully characterized by means of NMR and IR spectroscopy. X‐ray diffraction analyses were performed for the complexes [{Pt{P(4‐FC₆H₄)₃}}₂(μ‐SMe)(μ‐dppm)]Cl ( 3b ), [Pt(SMe)₂(dppm)] ( 4 ), and [{Pt(dppp)}₂(μ‐SMe)₂]Cl₂ ( 5 ).     

Metal catalysed Brooke rearrangement of 3-Halo-1-(trimethylsilyl) propan-2-one (Halo = Cl or Br)

The complexes [IrH(CO)(PPh₃)₃], trans-[IrCI(CO)- (PPh₃)₂], [RhH(PPh₃)₄], [Pd(PPh₃)₄], [Pt(trans-stilbene)(PPh₃)₂] and [Pt(η³-CH₂-COCH₂)-(PPh₃)₂] catalyse the rearrangement of Me₃SiCH₂C(O)CH₂Cl to CH₂?C(OSiMe₃)-CH₂Cl.     

Aromaten(phosphan)metall-komplexe: X. Protonierungsreaktionen der dimethylruthenium(II)-verbindungen C6Me6Ru(CH3)2PR3 und eine metallzentrierte bildung von 2-styryldiphenylphosphan

The compounds C₆Me₆Ru(CH₃)₂PR₃ (I, II) react with HBF₄/OEt₂ in the presence of CO or C₂H₄ to give the arene(methyl)ruthenium(II) complexes [C₆Me₆RuCH₃(CO)PRh₃]BF₄ (IV) and [C₆Me₆RuCH₃(C₂H₄)PP₃]BF₄ (V, VI), respectively. The hydrido(2-styryldiphenylphosphane) complex [C₆Me₆RuH(PPh₂C₆H₄CHCH₂)]BF₄ (VII) is formed from V (R = Ph) at room temperature by elimination of CH₄ and formation of a new CC bond. The reaction of I (R = Ph) with 50% HBF₄/H₂O in propionic anhydride gives the compound [C₆Me₆Ru(OCOEt)PPh₃]BF₄ (III) in which the propionate anion is coordinated as a chelate ligand.     

Reactions of dimethyldivinylsilane,dimethyldivinyltin and allyltrimethyltin with diethylene (tertiary) phosphine)platinum complexes

The compounds [Pt(C₂H₄)₂(PR₃)] [PR₃ = P-tBu₂Me, P(C₆H₁₁)₃, PPh₃] react dimethyldivinylsilane or dimethyldivinyltin to give chelate complexes [Pt{(CH₂CH)₂MMe₂} (PR₃)] (M = Si or Sn). allyltrimethyltin reacts with various diethylene (tertiary phosphine)platinum compounds with cleavage of the allyl group to afford complexes [Pt(SnMe₃)(η³-C₃H₅)(PR₂)]. The NMR spectra (¹³C, ¹H and ³¹P) of the new compounds have been recorded, and the data are discussed in terms of the structures proposed.     

Synthesis of homo- and heterodinuclear metal complexes with dimethylsilylene bridged unsymmetrical bis(cyclopentadienyl) ligand

The reaction of the dilithium salt Li₂[Me₂Si(C₅H₄)(C₅Me₄)] (2) of Me₂Si(C₅H₅)(C₅HMe₄) (1) with [MCl(C₈H₁₂)]₂ (M=Rh, Ir) and [RhCl(CO)₂]₂ afforded homodinuclear metal complexes [{Me₂Si(η⁵-C₅H₄)(η⁵-C₅Me₄)}{M(C₈H₁₂)}₂] (M=Rh: 3; M=Ir: 4) and [{Me₂Si(η⁵-C₅H₄)(η⁵-C₅Me₄)}Rh₂(CO)₂(μ-CO)] (5), respectively. The reaction of 2 with RhCl(CO)(PPh₃)₂ afforded a mononuclear metal complex [{Me₂Si(C₅HMe₄)(η⁵-C₅H₄)}Rh(CO)PPh₃] (6) leaving the C₅HMe₄ moiety intact. Taking advantage of the difference in reactivity of the two cyclopentadienyl moieties of 2, heterodinuclear complexes were prepared in one pot. Thus, the reaction of 2 with RhCl(CO)(PPh₃)₂, followed by the treatment with [MCl(C₈H₁₂)]₂ (M=Rh, Ir) afforded a homodinuclear metal complex [Rh(CO)PPh₃{(η⁵-C₅H₄)SiMe₂(η⁵-C₅Me₄)}Rh(C₈H₁₂)] (7) consisting of two rhodium centers with different ligands and a heterodinuclear metal complex [Rh(CO)(PPh₃){(η⁵-C₅H₄)SiMe₂(η⁵-C₅Me₄)}Ir(C₈H₁₂)] (8). The successive treatment of 2 with [IrCl(C₈H₁₂)]₂ and [RhCl(C₈H₁₂)]₂ provided heterodinuclear metal complex [Ir(C₈H₁₂){(η⁵-C₅H₄)SiMe₂(η⁵-C₅Me₄)}Rh(C₈H₁₂)] (9). The reaction of 2 with CoCl(PPh₃)₃ and then with PhCCPh gave a mononuclear cobaltacyclopentadiene complex [{Me₂Si(C₅Me₄H)(η⁵-C₅H₄)}Co(CPhCPhCPhCPh)(PPh₃)] (10). However, successive treatment of 2 with CoCl(PPh₃)₃, PhCCPh and [MCl(C₈H₁₂)]₂ in this order afforded heterodinuclear metal complexes [M(C₈H₁₂){(η⁵-C₅H₄)SiMe₂(η⁵-C₅Me₄)}Co(η⁴-C₄Ph₄)] (M=Rh: 11; M=Ir: 12) in which the cobalt center was connected to the C₅Me₄ moiety. Although the heating of 10 afforded a tetraphenylcyclobutadiene complex [{Me₂Si(C₅Me₄H)(η⁵-C₅H₄)}Co(η⁴-C₄Ph₄)] (13), in which the cobalt center was connected to the C₅H₄ moiety, simple heating of the reaction mixture of 2, CoCl(PPh₃)₃ and PhCCPh resulted in the formation of a tetraphenylcyclobutadiene complex [{Me₂Si(C₅H₅)(η⁵-C₅Me₄)}Co(η⁴-C₄Ph₄)] (14), in which the cobalt center was connected to the C₅Me₄ moiety. The mechanism of the cobalt transfer was suggested based on the electrophilicity of the formal trivalent cobaltacyclopentadiene moiety. In the presence of 1,5-cyclooctadiene, the reaction of 2 with CoCl(PPh₃)₃ provided a mononuclear cobalt cyclooctadiene complex [{Me₂Si(C₅Me₄H)(η⁵-C₅H₄)}Co(C₈H₁₂)] (15). The reaction of 15 with n-BuLi followed by the treatment with [MCl(C₈H₁₂)]₂ (M=Rh, Ir) afforded the heterodinuclear metal complexes of [Co(C₈H₁₂){(η⁵-C₅H₄)SiMe₂(η⁵-C₅Me₄)}M(C₈H₁₂)] (M=Rh: 16; M=Ir: 17). Treatment of 6 with Fe₂(CO)₉ at room temperature afforded a heterodinuclear metal complex [{Me₂Si(C₅HMe₄)(η⁵-C₅H₄)}{Rh(PPh₃)(μ-CO)₂Fe(CO)₃}] (18) in which the C₅HMe₄ moiety was kept intact. Treatment of dinuclear metal complex 5 with Fe₂(CO)₉ afforded a heterotrinuclear metal complex [{(η⁵-C₅H₄)SiMe₂(η⁵-C₅Me₄)}{Rh(CO)Rh(μ-CO)₂Fe(CO)₃}] (19) having a triangular metal framework. The crystal and molecular structures of 3, 11, 12, 18 and 19 have been determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis.     

Reduction of bis[(2-phosphinoethyl)tetramethyl-cyclopentadienyl]zirconium dichlorides: intramolecular C-H activation <Emphasis Type="Italic">vs.</Emphasis> stabilization of the low-valence metal center

Reduction of the R₂P-functionalized zirconocene dichlorides [C₅Me₄(CH₂)₂PR₂] (C₅Me₅)ZrCl₂ (R = Me (1) and Ph (2)) and [C₅Me₄(CH₂)₂PMe₂][C₅Me₄(CH₂)₂PR₂]ZrCl₂ (R = Me (3) and Ph (4)) with amalgamated magnesium was studied. In the reduction of compounds 1 and 2, intramolecular C-H activation highly selectively afforded the fulvene hydride complexes Zr(H)(η⁵−C₅Me₅)[η⁵:η²(C,P)−(CH₂)C₅Me₃CH₂CH₂PR₂] (R = Me (7), Ph (8)); in the case of compound 2, the aryl hydride Zr(H)(η₅:C₅Me₅)[η⁵:η¹(C)−C₅Me₄CH₂CH₂PPh(o−C₆H₄)] (9) was also formed. The reduction of complexes 3 and 4 gave the Zr^II derivatives Zr[η⁵:η¹(P)− C₅Me₄CH₂CH₂PMe₂]₂ (12) and Zr[η⁵:η₁(P)−C₅Me₄CH₂CH₂PMe₂][η⁵:η¹(P)−C₅Me₄CH₂ CH₂PPh₂] (14) stabilized by two phosphine groups. The second product in the reduction of compound 4 was the fulvene hydride complex Zr(H)(η⁵−C₅Me₄CH₂CH₂PPh₂)[η⁵:η²(C,P)−(CH₂)C₅Me₃CH₂CH₂PMe₂] (15). The reaction of compound 7 with an excess of MeI resulted selectively in replacement of the hydride ligand by iodide to give the complex ZrI(η⁵−C₅Me₅)[η⁵:η²(C,P)−(CH₂)C₅Me₃CH₂CH₂PMe₂] (10). In contrast, in the reaction of compound 7 with Me₂Si(H)Cl, the Zr-CH₂ bond underwent cleavage to give the chloride hydride complex Zr(H)Cl(η₅−C₅Me₅)[η⁵:η¹(P)−C₅Me₃(CH₂SiMe₂H)CH₂CH₂PMe₂] (11). In the reaction of complex 12 with CO, a phosphine group was replaced by CO to form the complex Zr(CO)(η5−C₅Me₄CH₂CH₂PMe₂)[η⁵:η¹(P)−C₅Me₄CH₂CH₂PMe₂] (13). The results obtained were compared with analogous reduction reactions of MeO-, MeS-, and Me₂N-functionalized zirconocene dichlorides. Published in Russian in Izvestiya Akademii Nauk. Seriya Khimicheskaya, No. 1, pp. 65–74, January, 2008.     

Syntheses and characterization of some new 2-picolylpalladium(II) complexes

The 2-picolylpalladium(II) complex [{Pd(CH₂Py)Cl(PPh₃)}₂] (CH₂Py=2-picolyl) (I), prepared from 2-picolyl chloride and [Pd(PPh₃)₄], was treated with lithium bromide, silver acetate, 4-picoline (pic) and silver perchlorate, thallium acetylacetonate{Tl(acac)}, sodium dimenthyldithiocarbamate-water-(1/2) {Na(dmdc). 2 H₂O}, and 1,2-bis(diphenylphospino)ethane (dppe) to yield [{PdBr(CH₂Py)(PPh₃)}₂] (II), [{Pd(CH₂Py)OAc(PPh₃)}₂] (III), [{Pd(Ch₂Py)(pic)(PPh₃)}₂](ClO₄)₂ (IV), [Pd(CH₂Py)(acac)(PPh₃)] (V), [Pd(CH₂Py)(dmdc)(PPh₃)] (VI), and [Pd(Ch₂Py)Cl(dppe)] (VII), respectively. Halogen abstraction from VII using silver perchlorate afforded an ionic complex [{Pd(CH₂Py)(dppe)}₂](ClO₄)₂ (VIII). It was concluded that the 2-picolyl groups in these eight complexes are σ-bonded to palladium, and that in the dinuclear complexes I, II, III, IV, and VIII, they serve as bridging ligands.     

Reaction of η-enone and enal-platinum(0) complexes with Lewis acidic compounds

Reaction of η²-enone and enal-platinum(0) complexes Pt(CH₂CHCOR)(PPh₃)₂ (R=H, Me) with Lewis acidic compounds BX₃ (X=F, C₆F₅) afforded adducts formed by coordination of boron to oxygen of the carbonyl group. The X-ray structure determination of the adduct formed from B(C₆F₅)₃ and η²-methylvinylketone complex showed no strong interaction between Pt and carbonyl carbon. In contrast to the inability of the palladium(0) η²-enone complexes to form any Me₃Al adduct, η²-cyclohexenoneplatinum(0) complex formed an isolable adduct with Me₃Al, the structure of which was also confirmed by X-ray analysis. The NMR spectral parameters (Pt-C, Pt-P and P-P coupling constants) of these adducts were compared with those of the original η²-enone or enal-platinum(0) complexes as well as the ordinary η³-allylplatinum cation [Pt(PPh₃)₂(MeCHCHCH₂)]⁺.     

Tridentate chelate π-bonded complexes of rhodium(I), iridium(I), and iridium(III) and chelate σ-bonded complexes of nickel(II), palladium(II), and platinum(II) formed by intramolecular hydrogen abstraction reactions

2,2′-Bis(o-diphenylphosphino)bibenzyl, o-Ph₂PC₆H₄CH₂CH₂C₆H₄PPh₂-o (bdpbz), is dehydrogenated by various rhodium complexes to give the planar rhodium(I) complex

Full-size image

, from which the ligand, 2,2′-bis(o-diphenylphosphino)-trans-stilbene (bdpps) can be displaced by treatment with sodium cyanide. The stilbene forms stable chelate olefin complexes with planar rhodium(I) and iridium(I) and with octahedral iridium(III). On reaction with halide complexes of nickel(II), palladium(II) or platinum(II), the stilbene ligands

Full-size image

(R = Ph or o-CH₃C₆H₄) lose a vinyl proton in the form of hydrogen chloride to give chelate, planar σ-vinyls of general formula =CHC₆H₄PR₂-o) (M = Ni, Pd, Pt; X = Cl, Br, I) of high thermal stability; analogous methyl derivatives =CHC₆H₄PR₂-o) are obtained from Pt(CH₃)₂(COD) (COD = 1,5-cyclooctadiene) and the stilbene ligands. The bibenzyl also forms chelate σ-benzyls HCH₂C₆H₄PPh₂-o) (M = Pd, Pt; X = Cl, Br, I). The ¹H NMR spectra of the o-tolyl methyl groups in the compounds =CHC₆H₄PR₂-o) (M = Ni, Pd, Pt; R = o-CH₃C₆H₄) vary with temperature, probably as a consequence of interconversion of enantiomers arising from restricted rotation about the M---P and M---C bonds. Possible mechanisms for the dehydrogenation reactions are briefly discussed.     

Novel P‐Stereogenic PCP Pincer‐Aryl Ruthenium(II) Complexes and Their Use in the Asymmetric Hydrogen Transfer Reaction of Acetophenone

Achiral P‐donor pincer‐aryl ruthenium complexes ([RuCl(PCP)(PPh₃)]) 4c , d were synthesized via transcyclometalation reactions by mixing equivalent amounts of [1,3‐phenylenebis(methylene)]bis[diisopropylphosphine] ( 2c ) or [1,3‐phenylenebis(methylene)]bis[diphenylphosphine] ( 2d ) and the N‐donor pincer‐aryl complex [RuCl{2,6‐(Me₂NCH₂)₂C₆H₃}(PPh₃)], ( 3 ; Scheme 2). The same synthetic procedure was successfully applied for the preparation of novel chiral P‐donor pincer‐aryl ruthenium complexes [RuCl(P*CP*)(PPh₃)] 4a , b by reacting P‐stereogenic pincer‐arenes (S,S)‐[1,3‐phenylenebis(methylene)]bis[(alkyl)(phenyl)phosphines] 2a , b (alkyl=ⁱPr or ^tBu, P*CHP*) and the complex [RuCl{2,6‐(Me₂NCH₂)₂C₆H₃}(PPh₃)], ( 3 ; Scheme 3). The crystal structures of achiral [RuCl(equation/tex2gif-sup-3.gifPCP)(PPh₃)] 4c and of chiral (S,S)‐[RuCl(equation/tex2gif-sup-6.gifPCP)(PPh₃)] 4a were determined by X‐ray diffraction (Fig. 3). Achiral [RuCl(PCP)(PPh₃)] complexes and chiral [RuCl(P*CP*)(PPh₃)] complexes were tested as catalyst in the H‐transfer reduction of acetophenone with propan‐2‐ol. With the chiral complexes, a modest enantioselectivity was obtained.     

Tantalocene complexes as bidentate métalloligands: (C5Me5)(C5H4X)Ta(H2)(PPh2) (C5Me5) (C5H4X)Ta(CO) (PPh2) (X = PPh2, CH2CH2NMe2)

The synthesis of new bidentate métalloligands derived from tantalocene(C₅Me₅)(C₅H₄X)Ta(H₂)(PPh₂) (X = PPh₂, 2P; X = CH₂CH₂NMe₂2N) and (C₅Me₅)(C₅H₄X)Ta(CO)(PPh₂) 4(P,N) is described. When opposed to chromium unsaturated fragments the phosphino functionalised complexes 2P and 4P act as chelating bidentate ligands affording Ta(V) (C₅Me₅)(C₅H₄PPh₂)Ta(CH₂) (μ-PPh₂)Cr(CO)₄ or Ta(III) (C₅Me₅)(C₅H₄PPh₂)Ta(CO)(μ-PPh₂)Cr(CO)₄ bimetallic complexes. The same reaction carried out starting from 2N gives rise to a μ-phosphido, μ-hydrido dibridged complex Cp*(C₅H₄CH₂CH₂NMe₂)TaH(μ-H)(μ-PPh₂)Cr(CO)₄.     

Impact of Group 10 Metals on the Solvent-Induced Disproportionation of o-Semiquinonato Complexes

The oxidation of [M^II(3,5-DTBCat)(DTBbpy)] (M=Ni ( [Ni] ), Pd ( [Pd] ), and Pt ( [Pt] ); 3,5-DTBCat=3,5-di-tert-butylcatecholato; DTBbpy=4,4′-di-tert-butyl-2,2′-bipyridine) afforded the dimeric {[Ni^II(3,5-DTBSQ)(DTBbpy)](PF₆)}₂ ( {[Ni](PF₆)}₂ ; 3,5-DTBSQ=3,5-di-tert-butylsemiquinonato) and monomeric semiquinonato (SQ) complexes [M^II(3,5-DTBSQ)(DTBbpy)](PF₆) (M=Pd ( [Pd](PF₆) ) and Pt ( [Pt](PF₆) )). The negative solvatochromic properties of the SQ complexes allowed us to estimate the relative order of their dipole moments: [Pd](PF₆) > [Pt](PF₆) > {[Ni](PF₆)}₂ . The complexes [Pd](PF₆) and [Pt](PF₆) adopt monomeric structures and are stable in CH₂Cl₂ and toluene, whereas they gradually disproportionate at room temperature to [M] and 3,5-di-tert-butylbenzoquinone (3,5-DTBBQ) in polar solvents such as THF, MeOH, EtOH, DMF, or DMSO. The results of spectroscopic studies suggested that the oxidized nickel complex adopts a monomeric structure ( [Ni](PF₆) ) in CH₂Cl₂, but a dimeric structure ( {[Ni](PF₆)}₂ ) in the other investigated solvents. In polar solvents, {[Ni](PF₆)}₂ may disproportionate to [Ni] and 3,5-DTBBQ at 323 K, thereby demonstrating a significant solvent- and metal-dependence in temperature. The relative activities of {[Ni](PF₆)}₂ and [M](PF₆) toward disproportionation are related to the electrochemically estimated K_dis values in CH₂Cl₂ and DMF. The present work demonstrates that solvent polarity and the dipole moments of the SQ complexes promote disproportionation, which can be controlled by a judicious choice of the metal ion, solvent, and temperature.     

Luminescent mononuclear and dinuclear cycloplatinated (II) complexes comprising azide and phosphine ancillary ligands

A new series of cycloplatinated (II) complexes with general formulas of [Pt (bhq)(N₃)(P)] [bhq = deprotonated 7,8‐benzo[h]quinoline, P = triphenyl phosphine (PPh₃) and methyldiphenyl phosphine], [Pt (bhq)(P^P)]N₃ [P^P = 1,1‐bis (diphenylphosphino)methane (dppm) and 1,2‐bis (diphenylphosphino)ethane] and [Pt₂(bhq)₂(μ‐P^P)(N₃)₂] [P^P = dppm and 1,2‐bis (diphenylphosphino)acetylene] is reported in this investigation. A combination of azide (N₃^?) and phosphine (monodentate and bidentate) was used as ancillary ligands to study their influences on the chromophoric cyclometalated ligand. All complexes were characterized by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. To confirm the presence of the N₃^? ligand directly connected to the platinum center, complex [Pt (bhq)(N₃)(PPh₃)] was further characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray crystallography. The photophysical properties of the new products were studied by UV–Vis spectroscopy in CH₂Cl₂ and photoluminescence spectroscopy in solid state (298 or 77 K) and in solution (77 K). Using density functional theory calculations, it was proved that, in addition to intraligand charge‐transfer (ILCT) and metal‐to‐ligand charge‐transfer (MLCT) transitions, the L′LCT (L′ = N₃, L = C^N) electronic transition has a remarkable contribution in low energy bands of the absorption spectra (for complexes [Pt (bhq)(N₃)(P)] and [Pt₂(bhq)₂(μ‐P^P)(N₃)₂]). It is indicative of the determining role of the N₃^? ligand in electronic transitions of these complexes, specifically in the low energy region. In this regard, the photoluminescence studies indicated that the emissions in such complexes originate from a mixed ³ILCT/³MLCT (intramolecular) and also from aggregations (intermolecular).     

Reactivity of olefin an acetylene complexes of platinum(0) towards tetrachloro-o-benzoquinone

Tetracloro-o-benzoquinone reacts with (diphenylacetylene)bis(tirphenylphosphine)platinum(0) to give the novel platinum(II) diphenylacetylene complex, Pt(C₆Cl₄O₂)PhCCPh)(PPh₃), (I), which reacts with hydrogen halides to give the compelexes cis-PtX₂(PhCCPh((PPh₃), (X = Cl or Br). Hydrogen chloride also readily removes the tetrachloro-o-benzoquinoneligand from the adducts Ni(C₆Cl₄O₂)(Ph₂PCH₂CH₂PPh₂) and M(C₆Cl₄O₂)(PPh₃)₂, (M = Pd or Pt) but it has no reaction upon Ir(Cl)(C₆Cl₄O₂)(CO)(PPh₃)₂ at room temperature. The acetylene in (1) is susceptible to nucleophilic attact and reaction with diethylamine gives the vinyl adduct Pt(C₆Cl₄O₂)(CPhCPh)NHEt₂)(PPh₃). Other reactions of (I) have also been studied. Attemps to prepare other olefin or acetylene complexes of platinum(II) by the action of tetrachlor-o-benzoquinone on the complexes Pt(L)(PPh₃)₂, (L = PhCCH,(Et)(Me)(HO)CCCC(OH)(Me)(Et), HOCH₂OH, CF₃CCCF₃, CF₂CF₂, CF₂CH₂ or trans-PhCHCHPh) are also described.     

The trans-Influence in Platinum (II) Complexes. 1H- and 13C-NMR. and X-ray structural studies of tridentate Schiff's base complexes of platinum (II)

¹H- and ¹³C-NMR. data are reported for the complexes [Pt (1) L] and [Pt (2) L]; 1 = OC₆H₄CH ? NCH₂CH₂O, 2 = OC₆H₄CH ? NC₆H₄O; L = PR₃, AsR₃, C ? N (cyclohexyl), DMSO, pyridine, secondary amine. The molecular structures of [Pt (2) (NHEt₂)] (I) and [Pt (2) (PPh₃)] (II) have been determined by X-ray analysis. Relevant bond distances for I: Pt-N (amine) = 2.076 Å, Pt-N (imine) = 2.017 Å, Pt-O = 1.992 Å and 2.002 Å; for II: Pt-P = 2.248 Å, Pt-N = 2.064 Å, Pt-O = 1.964 and 2.005 Å. Both the solid and solution state data are interpreted in terms of differences in the trans influence of the ligand L. The question of metal-ligand d-p π back bonding to the imine is discussed.     

The Synthesis of Mono- and Bi-Metallic Platinum(II) and/or (IV) Complexes Containing the Ligand Bis(diphenylphosphino) Methylamine

Complexes of the type [Pt R₂ (dppma-PP′)] (R─Me, Et, Ph, CH₂Ph, C₆H₄ Me-p, C₆H₄OMe-2, CH₂CMe₃, 1-naphthyl, C₆H₄Me-o, dppma = Ph₂PNMe PPh₂) have been prepared from [PtCl₂, (dppma-PP′)] and the corresponding alkyl-lithium or Grignard reagents. Equilibrium constants, k, for the conversion of [PtR₂ (dppma-PP′)] into cis-[PtR₂(dppma-P)₂] with dppma were studied using ³¹P NMR spectroscopy at room temperature. Equilibrium is rapidly established for R─C₆H₄-Me-o, at 20°C. Complex of the type cis-[PtR₂ (dppma-P)₂] was isolated R─C₆H₄ Me-o. The complexes [PtMe₂(dppma-P)₂] and [Pt(o-methoxyphenyl)₂(dppma-P)₂] were prepared, but unfortunately decomposed once isolated, the only evidence for its formation being from ³¹P-{¹H} NMZR spectroscopy. The o-tolyl or 1-naphthyl complexes exist as syn-anti mixtures in solution, due to restricted rotation around the platinum aryl bonds. Treatment of several complexes of the type [PtR₂(dppma-PP′)] with MeI gives [PtR₂Me(I)(dppma-PP′)] with trans addition of MeI. Treatment of [PtR₂(dppma-PP′)] with HCl gives [Pt Cl (R) (dppma-PP′)] for R─C₆H₂Me₃-2,4,6, C₆H₄-CH₃-2, C₆H₄-Me-4, Me, 1-naphthyl. The ¹H, ³¹P NMR parameters for these complexes are discussed. Attempted preparation of complexes of the type [PtR₂ (dppma-P)₂M] (R─C₆H₄-Me-2, Me CN-C₆H₄-Me-4); M─Pd, Pt, Au,) are reported.     

Preparation and Characterization of Trimethylsilylpyridylacetylene Bridged,Dicobalt Carbonyl Complexes Containing Bis(diphenylphosphino)methylene or Bis(diphenylphosphino)ethylene Ligand

Reaction of an alkyne‐bridged dicobalt complex, [Co₂(CO)₆(μ‐Me₃SiC=Cpy)] 4 , with bis(diphenylphosphino)methylene (DPPM) or bis(diphenylphosphino)ethylene (DPPE) in THF at 55 °C yielded a DPPM or DPPE doubly bridged dicobalt compound, [{μ‐P,P‐PPh₂CH₂PPh₂}Co₂(CO)₄(μ‐Me₃SiC=Cpy)] 5 or [{μ‐P,P‐PPh₂CH₂CH₂PPh₂}Co₂(CO)₄(μ‐Me₃SiC≡Cpy)] 6 . Compound 5 and 6 were characterized by spectroscopic means as well as X‐ray crystal structure determination.     

Synthesis,X-ray structural and DFT studies of n-membered ring P,C-chelated complexes of Pd(II) and Pt(II) derived from unsymmetrical phosphorus ylides and application of Pd(II) complexes as catalyst in Suzuki reaction

The phosphonium salts [Ph₂P(CH₂)_nPPh₂CH₂C(O)C₆H₄-m-OMe]Br (n = 1 (S₁) and n = 2 (S₂)) were synthesized in the reaction of bis(diphenylphosphino)methane (dppm) and bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane (dppe) with 2-bromo-3?-methoxy acetophenone, respectively. Further treatment with NEt₃ gave the phosphorus ylides Ph₂P(CH₂)_nPPh₂C(H)C(O)C₆H₄-m-OMe (n = 1 (Y₁) and n = 2 (Y₂)). These ligands were treated with [MCl₂(cod)] (M = Pd or Pt; cod = 1,5-cyclooctadiene) to give the P, C-chelated complexes, [MCl₂(Ph₂P(CH₂)_nPPh₂C(H)C(O)C₆H₄-m-OMe)] (n = 1, M = Pd (3), Pt (4), and n = 2, M = Pd (5), Pt (6)). These compounds were characterized by elemental analysis, spectroscopic methods, UV–visible, and fluorescence emission spectra. Further, the structures of complexes 3 and 6 were characterized crystallographically. The palladium complexes 3 and 5 proved to be excellent catalysts for the Suzuki reactions of various aryl chlorides. Also, a theoretical study on the structure of complexes 3–6 has been investigated at the BP86/def2-SVP level of theory. The strength and nature of donor?acceptor bonds between the phosphorus ylides (L) and MCl₂ fragment in the [LMCl₂] (M = Pd, Pt, L = Y₁, Y₂) were studied by NBO and energy decomposition analysis (EDA), as well as their natural orbitals for chemical valence variation (EDA-NOCV).     

Hydridocyanoalkyl complexes of platinum(II). Insertion of olefins into the PtH bond

The preparation and spectroscopic properties are described of some platinum(II) complexes having a hydride ligand cis or trans to an sp³ carbon, viz. trans-PtH(YCN)(PPh₃)₂ and cis-PtH(YCN)(LL) with YCN = C₂H₄CN, n-C₃H₆CN, o-CH₂C₆H₄CN and LL = bis(diphenylphosphino)-ethene or -ethane. The complexes trans-PtH(YCN)(PPh₃)₂ can add a fifth ligand in solution; the resulting five-coordinate complex was observed by ³¹P NMR in the case of PtH(C₃H₆CN)(PPh₃)₃. Insertion of olefin (ethen, 1-cyanoethene, norbornadiene, allen) into the PtH bond of the trans-hydrido complexes occurs to give cis-dialkyl complexes, but the cis-hydrido complexes are unreactive. The mechanism of insertion is discussed in terms of the kinetics and the geometries of reactants and products.     

Variable Bonding Modes of Pyrimidine‐2‐thione in PdII/PtII Complexes [M(η2‐N,S‐pymS)(η1‐S‐pymS)(PPh3)] and [M(η1‐S‐pymS)2(L‐L)] (L‐L = dppm,dppe)

Reactions of pyrimidine‐2‐thione (HpymS) with Pd^II/Pt^IV salts in the presence of triphenyl phosphine and bis(diphenylphosphino)alkanes, Ph₂P‐(CH₂)_m‐PPh₂ (m = 1, 2) have yielded two types of complexes, viz. a) [M(η²‐N, S‐ pymS)(η¹‐S‐ pymS)(PPh₃)] (M = Pd, 1 ; Pt, 2 ), and (b) [M(η¹‐S‐pymS)₂(L‐L)] {L‐L, M = dppm (m = 1) Pd, 3 ; Pt, 4 ; dppe (m = 2), Pd, 5 ; Pt, 6 }. Complexes have been characterized by elemental analysis (C, H, N), NMR spectroscopy (¹H, ¹³C, ³¹P), and single crystal X‐ray crystallography ( 1 , 2 , 4 , and 5 ). Complexes 1 and 2 have terminal η¹‐S and chelating η²‐N, S‐modes of pymS⁻, while other Pd/Pt complexes have only terminal η¹‐S modes. The solution state ³¹P NMR spectral data reveal dynamic equilibrium for the complexes 3 , 5 and 6 , whereas the complexes 1 , 2 and 4 are static in solution state.