首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Comparative ballistic efficiency of solid composite propellants: which plasticizer/polymer combination is the energetically preferred binder?
Institution:1. Institute of Problems of Chemical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 142432 Chernogolovka Moscow Region, Russian Federation;2. N. D. Zelinsky Institute of Organic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russian Federation
Abstract:The relative efficacy of real energetic plasticizers and polymers for model solid composite propellants comprising 25% aluminum hydride, 50% dinitramide ammonium salt and 25% binder (20% a plasticizer and 5% a polymer) has been estimated. The quantitative dependence of the efficiency of plasticizers on the value of their enthalpy of formation ΔHt0, the oxygen coefficient α, percentage of hydrogen %H and density d has been revealed. 3,4-Dinitrofurazan tested as a plasticizer for the binder provides effective impulse values at the 3rd stage up to ~2 s higher than those for other plasticizers.
Keywords:solid composite propellant  binder  polymer  plasticizer  specific impulse  effective impulse
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号