VARIATION IN THE PHOTOCHEMICAL REACTIVITY OF THYMINE IN THE DNA OF B. SUBTILIS SPORES, VEGETATIVE CELLS AND SPORES GERMINATED IN CHLORAMPHENICOL*,†

Abstract— The chief photoproduct of thymine produced in u.v. irradiated (2537Å) vegetative cells of B. subtilis is the cyclobutane-type dimer while in spores very little of this dimer is produced (maximum yield 2·6 per cent of thymine) but a new photoproduct is produced in high yield (maximum of 28·4 per cent of thymine). This difference in photochemical response appears to be due, at least in part, to a difference in uydration of the DNA. The photochemistry of thymine in isolated DNA irradiated in solution is similar to that of DNA in irradiated vegetative cells, but differs markedly from that of isolated DNA irradiated dry. The yield of cyclobutane-type thymine dimer is much reduced in isolated DNA irradiated dry but a new photoproduct of thymine. is produced which is chromatographically similar to the spore photoproduct. The yield of this photoproduct, however, is never as great as that obtained in irradiated spores. The photochemistry of the DNA thymine of spores germinated in the presence of chloramphenicol is very similar to that of normal vegetative cells. Except for hydration, the physical state of the DNA is probably not otherwise altered by germination in the presence of chloramphenicol since DNA replication is prevented by the presence of chloramphenicol. These results are also consistent with the hypothesis that the unique photochemistry of spores is due, at least in part, to the hydration state of the DNA. The acid stability of the spore photoproduct is indicated by the fact that it is isolated from irradiated spores after hydrolysis in trifluoroacetic acid at 155°C for 60 min. It still contains the methyl group of thymine as judged by the fact that for a given dose of u.v. the same yield of photoproduct was obtained whether the spores were labeled with thymine-2–C-14 or -methyl-C-14. This photoproduct is stable to reirradiation (2537Å) in solution under condiditions where thymine dimers of the cyclobutane-type are completely converted back to monomeric thymine. On a column of molecular sieve material (Sephadex-G10), the spore photoproduct elutes in a region intermediate between the cyclobutanetype thymine dimers and monomeric thymine. Of the numerous compounds tested by paper chromatography, the spore photoproduct is most similar (but not identical) in several solvents to 5–hydroxyuracil and 5–hydroxymethyluracil. Our data do not allow us to decide if the product is a monomer or a dimer. Although the photochemistry of thymine in the DNA of spores differs markedly from that for vegetative cells, several lines of evidence make it seem doubtful that the enhanced resistance of spores to u.v. relative to that of vegetative cells can be explained solely on the basis of this difference in the photochemistry of DNA thymine.