首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Determination of total arsenic and arsenic (III) in phosphate fertilizers and phosphate rocks by HG-AAS after multivariate optimization based on Box-Behnken design
Authors:Samuel M. Macedo  Raildo M. de Jesus  Karina S. Garcia  Antonio F. de S. Queiroz
Affiliation:a Instituto de Química, Universidade Federal da Bahia, CEP 40170-270, Salvador-BA, Brazil
b Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia, INCT, de Energia e Ambiente, Universidade Federal da Bahia, 40170-290 Salvador-BA, Brazil
c Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Departamento de Ciências Exatas e Tecnológicas, CEP 45650-000, Ilhéus-BA, Brazil
d Universidade Federal da Bahia, Instituto de Geociências, Núcleo de Estudos Ambientais, Brazil
Abstract:In the present paper, a procedure for the determination of total arsenic and arsenic (III) in phosphate fertilizers and phosphate rocks by slurry sampling (SS) with hydride generation atomic absorption spectrometry (HG-AAS) is proposed. Arsenic (III) is determinated directly and total arsenic is determinated after reduction reaction. The procedure was optimized for the flow rate of NaBH4, NaBH4 and hydrochloric acid concentrations using a full two-level factorial and also a Box-Behnken design. Slurry preparation with hydrochloric acid in an ultrasonic bath allowed the determination of arsenic (III) with limits of detection and quantification of 0.1 and 0.3 μg L−1, respectively. The precision of results, expressed as relative standard deviation (RSD), was always lower than 3%. The accuracy of this method was confirmed by analysis of certified sediment reference materials, while the procedure also allows for calibration using aqueous external standards. This method (SS/HG-AAS) was used to determine total arsenic and arsenic (III) in two phosphate rock samples and two phosphate fertilizer samples. In these samples, total arsenic concentrations varied from 5.2 to 20.0 mg kg−1, while As (III) concentrations varied from 2.1 to 5.5 mg kg−1, in agreement with published values. All samples were also analyzed using acid digestion/HG-AAS. Both, a paired t-test and a linear regression model demonstrated no significant difference (95% CL) between the results obtained using these two sample preparation procedures.
Keywords:Multivariate optimization   Slurry sampling   Phosphate rocks   Phosphate fertilizers   Arsenic   Hydride generation   Atomic absorption spectrometry
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号