首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Gap detection for similar and dissimilar gap markers
Authors:Grose J H  Hall J W  Buss E  Hatch D
Institution:Division of Otolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 27599-7070, USA.
Abstract:Detection thresholds for temporal gaps between markers of dissimilar frequency are usually elevated with respect to thresholds for gaps between markers of similar frequency. Because gaps between markers of dissimilar frequency represent both a spectrally based perceptual discontinuity as well as a temporal discontinuity, it is not clear what factors underlie the threshold elevation. This study sought to examine the effects of perceptual dissimilarities on gap detection. The first experiment measured gap detection for configurations of narrow-band gap markers comprised of pure tones, frequency-modulated tones, and amplitude-modulated tones. The results showed that gap thresholds for frequency-disparate pure-tone markers were elevated with respect to isofrequency tonal markers, but that perceptual discontinuities between markers restricted to the same frequency region did not uniformly elevate threshold. The second experiment measured gap detection for configurations of markers where the leading and trailing markers could differ along the dimensions of bandwidth, duration, and pitch. The results showed that, in most cases, gap detection deteriorated when the bandwidth of the two markers differed, even when the spectral content of the narrower-band marker was completely subsumed by the spectral content of the wider-band marker. This finding suggests that gap detection is sensitive to spectral dissimilarity between markers in addition to spectral discontinuity. The effects of marker duration depended on the marker bandwidth. Pitch differences across spectrally similar markers had no effect.
Keywords:
本文献已被 PubMed 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号