A counterexample to a hadamard matrix pivot conjecture

In the study of the growth factor of completely pivoted Hadamard matrices, it becomes natural to study the possible pivots. Very little is known or provable about these pivots other than a few cases at the beginning and end. For example it is known that the first four pivots must be 1,2,2 and 4 and the last three pivots in backwards order must be n/2, and n/2. Based on computational experiments, it was conjectured by Day and Peterson, that the n—3rd pivot must always be n/4. This conjecture would have suggested a kind of symmetry with the first four pivots. In this note we demonstrate a matrix whose n-3rd pivot is n/2 showing that the conjecture is false.