首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Structure and bonding in solution of dioxouranium(VI) oxalate complexes: isomers and intramolecular ligand exchange
Authors:Vallet Valérie  Moll Henry  Wahlgren Ulf  Szabó Zoltán  Grenthe Ingmar
Institution:Institute of Physics, Stockholm University, P.O. Box 6730, S-11385 Stockholm, Sweden. valerie.vallet@ch.tum.de
Abstract:Structural isomers of UO(2)(oxalate)(3)](4-), UO(2)(oxalate)F(3)](3-), UO(2)(oxalate)(2)F](3-), and UO(2)(oxalate)(2)(H(2)O)](2-) have been studied by using EXAFS and quantum chemical ab initio methods. Theoretical structures and their relative energies were determined in the gas phase and in water using the CPCM model. The most stable isomers according to the quantum chemical calculations have geometries consistent with the EXAFS data, and the difference between measured and calculated bond distances is generally less than 0.05 A. The complex UO(2)(oxalate)(3)](4-) contains two oxalate ligands forming five-membered chelate rings, while the third is bonded end-on to a single carboxylate oxygen. The most stable isomer of the other two complexes also contains the same type of chelate-bonded oxalate ligands. The activation energy for ring opening in UO(2)(oxalate)F(3)](3-), deltaU++ = 63 kJ/mol, is in fair agreement with the experimental activation enthalpy, deltaH++ = 45 +/- 5 kJ/mol, for different UO(2)(picolinate)F(3)](2-) complexes, indicating similar ring-opening mechanisms. No direct experimental information is available on intramolecular exchange in UO(3)(oxalate)(3)](4-). The theoretical results indicate that it takes place via the tris-chelated intermediate with an activation energy of deltaU++ = 38 kJ/mol; the other pathways involve multiple steps and have much higher activation energies. The geometries and energies of dioxouranium(VI) complexes in the gas phase and solvent models differ slightly, with differences in bond distance and energy of typically less than 0.06 A and 10 kJ/mol, respectively. However, there might be a significant difference in the distance between uranium and the leaving/entering group in the transition state, resulting in a systematic error when the gas-phase geometry is used to estimate the activation energy in solution. This systematic error is about 10 kJ/mol and tends to cancel when comparing different pathways.
Keywords:
本文献已被 PubMed 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号