Chemical databases evaluated by order theoretical tools |
| |
Authors: | Kristina Voigt Rainer Brüggemann Stefan Pudenz |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) GSF - National Research Center for Environment and Health, Institute of Biomathematics and Biometry, 85764 Neuherberg, Germany;(2) Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, 12587 Berlin, Germany;(3) Criterion Evaluation and Information Management, 10999 Berlin, Germany |
| |
Abstract: | Data on environmental chemicals are urgently needed to comply with the future chemicals policy in the European Union. The availability of data on parameters and chemicals can be evaluated by chemometrical and environmetrical methods. Different mathematical and statistical methods are taken into account in this paper. The emphasis is set on a new, discrete mathematical method called METEOR (method of evaluation by order theory). Application of the Hasse diagram technique (HDT) of the complete data-matrix comprising 12 objects (databases) × 27 attributes (parameters + chemicals) reveals that ECOTOX (ECO), environmental fate database (EFD) and extoxnet (EXT)—also called multi-database databases—are best. Most single databases which are specialised are found in a minimal position in the Hasse diagram; these are biocatalysis/biodegradation database (BID), pesticide database (PES) and UmweltInfo (UMW). The aggregation of environmental parameters and chemicals (equal weight) leads to a slimmer data-matrix on the attribute side. However, no significant differences are found in the best and worst objects. The whole approach indicates a rather bad situation in terms of the availability of data on existing chemicals and hence an alarming signal concerning the new and existing chemicals policies of the EEC.Electronic Supplementary Material Supplementary material is available for this article at |
| |
Keywords: | Chemometrics Environmetrics Hasse diagram technique (HDT) METEOR Environmental chemicals Environmental chemical databases |
本文献已被 PubMed SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|